Equal scrutiny: privatization and accountability in digital education
"In the current rush to adopt and expand digital learning, many important considerations are being overlooked that will have major consequences for the future of American public education. As private education technology contractors and vendors move deeper into the work of public education, que...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge, Mass.
Harvard Education Press
2014
|
Schlagworte: | |
Zusammenfassung: | "In the current rush to adopt and expand digital learning, many important considerations are being overlooked that will have major consequences for the future of American public education. As private education technology contractors and vendors move deeper into the work of public education, questions concerning the quality of the services, who is served, and who benefits need to be answered. Based on participatory research and other studies of three types of digital education--digital courses, blended learning, and online tutoring--Equal Scrutiny offers readers an inside view of what is really going on in the world of digital education and the uneven experiences of students, their parents, and teachers. The authors also offer critical questions that need to be asked in order to--in the authors' words--'ensure that technology adds value to the learning and lives of students and staff in public school communities.'"-- |
Beschreibung: | Includes bibliographical references (pages 197-211) and index The storm surge in digital education and privatization -- Faulty assumptions : how market models of accountability undercut the potential of digital education -- The promises and challenges of instructor-driven digital courses -- Commercial spaces and opportunities to learn in a digital school -- Policy context and commercial decisions in digital tutoring -- Changing the dialogue : tools for building transparency and accountability in digital education for students in low-income settings -- Equal scrutiny : digital education and the struggle for equity, quality, and accountability -- Appendix : research notes on the digital education cases |
Beschreibung: | VI, 225 S. graph. Darst. |
ISBN: | 9781612506852 1612506852 9781612506845 1612506844 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV042260460 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20150309 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 150108s2014 d||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 9781612506852 |9 978-1-61250-685-2 | ||
020 | |a 1612506852 |9 1-61250-685-2 | ||
020 | |a 9781612506845 |9 978-1-61250-684-5 | ||
020 | |a 1612506844 |9 1-61250-684-4 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)915549176 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV042260460 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-188 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Burch, Patricia |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Equal scrutiny |b privatization and accountability in digital education |c Patricia Burch ; Annalee G. Good |
264 | 1 | |a Cambridge, Mass. |b Harvard Education Press |c 2014 | |
300 | |a VI, 225 S. |b graph. Darst. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 197-211) and index | ||
500 | |a The storm surge in digital education and privatization -- Faulty assumptions : how market models of accountability undercut the potential of digital education -- The promises and challenges of instructor-driven digital courses -- Commercial spaces and opportunities to learn in a digital school -- Policy context and commercial decisions in digital tutoring -- Changing the dialogue : tools for building transparency and accountability in digital education for students in low-income settings -- Equal scrutiny : digital education and the struggle for equity, quality, and accountability -- Appendix : research notes on the digital education cases | ||
520 | |a "In the current rush to adopt and expand digital learning, many important considerations are being overlooked that will have major consequences for the future of American public education. As private education technology contractors and vendors move deeper into the work of public education, questions concerning the quality of the services, who is served, and who benefits need to be answered. Based on participatory research and other studies of three types of digital education--digital courses, blended learning, and online tutoring--Equal Scrutiny offers readers an inside view of what is really going on in the world of digital education and the uneven experiences of students, their parents, and teachers. The authors also offer critical questions that need to be asked in order to--in the authors' words--'ensure that technology adds value to the learning and lives of students and staff in public school communities.'"-- | ||
650 | 4 | |a Privatization in education / United States | |
650 | 4 | |a Educational accountability / United States | |
650 | 4 | |a Computer-assisted instruction / United States | |
650 | 4 | |a Computer-assisted instruction / United States / Evaluation | |
650 | 7 | |a Computer-assisted instruction |2 fast | |
650 | 7 | |a Computer-assisted instruction / Evaluation |2 fast | |
650 | 7 | |a Educational accountability |2 fast | |
650 | 7 | |a Privatization in education |2 fast | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a E-Learning |0 (DE-588)4727098-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
651 | 7 | |a United States |2 fast | |
651 | 4 | |a USA | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a E-Learning |0 (DE-588)4727098-6 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
700 | 1 | |a Good, Annalee G. |e Sonstige |0 (DE-588)1065894929 |4 oth | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027698244 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804152812857196545 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
author | Burch, Patricia |
author_GND | (DE-588)1065894929 |
author_facet | Burch, Patricia |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Burch, Patricia |
author_variant | p b pb |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV042260460 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)915549176 (DE-599)BVBBV042260460 |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03330nam a2200493 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV042260460</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20150309 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">150108s2014 d||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781612506852</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-61250-685-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1612506852</subfield><subfield code="9">1-61250-685-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781612506845</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-61250-684-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1612506844</subfield><subfield code="9">1-61250-684-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)915549176</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV042260460</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Burch, Patricia</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Equal scrutiny</subfield><subfield code="b">privatization and accountability in digital education</subfield><subfield code="c">Patricia Burch ; Annalee G. Good</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge, Mass.</subfield><subfield code="b">Harvard Education Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">VI, 225 S.</subfield><subfield code="b">graph. Darst.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references (pages 197-211) and index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The storm surge in digital education and privatization -- Faulty assumptions : how market models of accountability undercut the potential of digital education -- The promises and challenges of instructor-driven digital courses -- Commercial spaces and opportunities to learn in a digital school -- Policy context and commercial decisions in digital tutoring -- Changing the dialogue : tools for building transparency and accountability in digital education for students in low-income settings -- Equal scrutiny : digital education and the struggle for equity, quality, and accountability -- Appendix : research notes on the digital education cases</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"In the current rush to adopt and expand digital learning, many important considerations are being overlooked that will have major consequences for the future of American public education. As private education technology contractors and vendors move deeper into the work of public education, questions concerning the quality of the services, who is served, and who benefits need to be answered. Based on participatory research and other studies of three types of digital education--digital courses, blended learning, and online tutoring--Equal Scrutiny offers readers an inside view of what is really going on in the world of digital education and the uneven experiences of students, their parents, and teachers. The authors also offer critical questions that need to be asked in order to--in the authors' words--'ensure that technology adds value to the learning and lives of students and staff in public school communities.'"--</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Privatization in education / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Educational accountability / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Computer-assisted instruction / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Computer-assisted instruction / United States / Evaluation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Computer-assisted instruction</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Computer-assisted instruction / Evaluation</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Educational accountability</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Privatization in education</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">E-Learning</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4727098-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">E-Learning</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4727098-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Good, Annalee G.</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1065894929</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027698244</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | United States fast USA |
geographic_facet | United States USA |
id | DE-604.BV042260460 |
illustrated | Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T01:16:40Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9781612506852 1612506852 9781612506845 1612506844 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027698244 |
oclc_num | 915549176 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-188 |
owner_facet | DE-188 |
physical | VI, 225 S. graph. Darst. |
publishDate | 2014 |
publishDateSearch | 2014 |
publishDateSort | 2014 |
publisher | Harvard Education Press |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Burch, Patricia Verfasser aut Equal scrutiny privatization and accountability in digital education Patricia Burch ; Annalee G. Good Cambridge, Mass. Harvard Education Press 2014 VI, 225 S. graph. Darst. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Includes bibliographical references (pages 197-211) and index The storm surge in digital education and privatization -- Faulty assumptions : how market models of accountability undercut the potential of digital education -- The promises and challenges of instructor-driven digital courses -- Commercial spaces and opportunities to learn in a digital school -- Policy context and commercial decisions in digital tutoring -- Changing the dialogue : tools for building transparency and accountability in digital education for students in low-income settings -- Equal scrutiny : digital education and the struggle for equity, quality, and accountability -- Appendix : research notes on the digital education cases "In the current rush to adopt and expand digital learning, many important considerations are being overlooked that will have major consequences for the future of American public education. As private education technology contractors and vendors move deeper into the work of public education, questions concerning the quality of the services, who is served, and who benefits need to be answered. Based on participatory research and other studies of three types of digital education--digital courses, blended learning, and online tutoring--Equal Scrutiny offers readers an inside view of what is really going on in the world of digital education and the uneven experiences of students, their parents, and teachers. The authors also offer critical questions that need to be asked in order to--in the authors' words--'ensure that technology adds value to the learning and lives of students and staff in public school communities.'"-- Privatization in education / United States Educational accountability / United States Computer-assisted instruction / United States Computer-assisted instruction / United States / Evaluation Computer-assisted instruction fast Computer-assisted instruction / Evaluation fast Educational accountability fast Privatization in education fast E-Learning (DE-588)4727098-6 gnd rswk-swf United States fast USA E-Learning (DE-588)4727098-6 s DE-604 Good, Annalee G. Sonstige (DE-588)1065894929 oth |
spellingShingle | Burch, Patricia Equal scrutiny privatization and accountability in digital education Privatization in education / United States Educational accountability / United States Computer-assisted instruction / United States Computer-assisted instruction / United States / Evaluation Computer-assisted instruction fast Computer-assisted instruction / Evaluation fast Educational accountability fast Privatization in education fast E-Learning (DE-588)4727098-6 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4727098-6 |
title | Equal scrutiny privatization and accountability in digital education |
title_auth | Equal scrutiny privatization and accountability in digital education |
title_exact_search | Equal scrutiny privatization and accountability in digital education |
title_full | Equal scrutiny privatization and accountability in digital education Patricia Burch ; Annalee G. Good |
title_fullStr | Equal scrutiny privatization and accountability in digital education Patricia Burch ; Annalee G. Good |
title_full_unstemmed | Equal scrutiny privatization and accountability in digital education Patricia Burch ; Annalee G. Good |
title_short | Equal scrutiny |
title_sort | equal scrutiny privatization and accountability in digital education |
title_sub | privatization and accountability in digital education |
topic | Privatization in education / United States Educational accountability / United States Computer-assisted instruction / United States Computer-assisted instruction / United States / Evaluation Computer-assisted instruction fast Computer-assisted instruction / Evaluation fast Educational accountability fast Privatization in education fast E-Learning (DE-588)4727098-6 gnd |
topic_facet | Privatization in education / United States Educational accountability / United States Computer-assisted instruction / United States Computer-assisted instruction / United States / Evaluation Computer-assisted instruction Computer-assisted instruction / Evaluation Educational accountability Privatization in education E-Learning United States USA |
work_keys_str_mv | AT burchpatricia equalscrutinyprivatizationandaccountabilityindigitaleducation AT goodannaleeg equalscrutinyprivatizationandaccountabilityindigitaleducation |