The stubborn system of moral responsibility:
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge, Massachusetts [u.a.]
<<The>> MIT Press
2015
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Beschreibung: | Includes bibliographical references and index The philosophical commitment to moral responsibility seems unshakable. But, argues Bruce Waller, the philosophical belief in moral responsibility is much stronger than the philosophical arguments in favor of it. Philosophers have tried to make sense of moral responsibility for centuries, with mixed results. Most contemporary philosophers insist that even conclusive proof of determinism would not and should not result in doubts about moral responsibility. Many embrace compatibilist views, and propose an amazing variety of competing compatibilist arguments for saving moral responsibility. In this provocative book, Waller examines the stubborn philosophical belief in moral responsibility, surveying the philosophical arguments for it but focusing on the system that supports these arguments: powerful social and psychological factors that hold the belief in moral responsibility firmly in place. Waller argues that belief in moral responsibility is not isolated but rather is a central element of a larger belief system; doubting or rejecting moral responsibility will involve major adjustments elsewhere in a wide range of beliefs and values. Belief in moral responsibility is one strand of a complex and closely woven fabric of belief, comprising threads from biology, psychology, social institutions, criminal justice, religion, and philosophy. These dense interconnections, Waller contends, make it very difficult to challenge the belief in moral responsibility at the center. They not only influence the philosophical arguments in favor of moral responsibility but also add powerful extraphilosophical support for it. |
Beschreibung: | X, 294 S. |
ISBN: | 9780262028165 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV042200679 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20151105 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 141120s2015 xxu |||| 00||| eng d | ||
010 | |a 014013243 | ||
020 | |a 9780262028165 |c hbk. |9 978-0-262-02816-5 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)904124665 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV042200679 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
044 | |a xxu |c US | ||
049 | |a DE-19 |a DE-12 |a DE-M468 |a DE-355 | ||
050 | 0 | |a BJ1451 | |
082 | 0 | |a 170 |2 23 | |
084 | |a CC 7200 |0 (DE-625)17672: |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a Waller, Bruce N. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a The stubborn system of moral responsibility |c Bruce N. Waller |
264 | 1 | |a Cambridge, Massachusetts [u.a.] |b <<The>> MIT Press |c 2015 | |
300 | |a X, 294 S. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index | ||
500 | |a The philosophical commitment to moral responsibility seems unshakable. But, argues Bruce Waller, the philosophical belief in moral responsibility is much stronger than the philosophical arguments in favor of it. Philosophers have tried to make sense of moral responsibility for centuries, with mixed results. Most contemporary philosophers insist that even conclusive proof of determinism would not and should not result in doubts about moral responsibility. Many embrace compatibilist views, and propose an amazing variety of competing compatibilist arguments for saving moral responsibility. In this provocative book, Waller examines the stubborn philosophical belief in moral responsibility, surveying the philosophical arguments for it but focusing on the system that supports these arguments: powerful social and psychological factors that hold the belief in moral responsibility firmly in place. Waller argues that belief in moral responsibility is not isolated but rather is a central element of a larger belief system; doubting or rejecting moral responsibility will involve major adjustments elsewhere in a wide range of beliefs and values. Belief in moral responsibility is one strand of a complex and closely woven fabric of belief, comprising threads from biology, psychology, social institutions, criminal justice, religion, and philosophy. These dense interconnections, Waller contends, make it very difficult to challenge the belief in moral responsibility at the center. They not only influence the philosophical arguments in favor of moral responsibility but also add powerful extraphilosophical support for it. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Responsibility | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Verantwortungsethik |0 (DE-588)4236475-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Verantwortungsethik |0 (DE-588)4236475-9 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Regensburg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027639564&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027639564 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1811004070677184512 |
---|---|
adam_text |
Contents
Preface vii
1 The Powerful Belief in Moral Responsibility 1
2 Redefining Moral Responsibility 9
3 The Strike-Back Roots of Moral Responsibility 39
4 Belief in a Just World 53
5 Emotions without Moral Responsibility 79
6 The Power of the Moral Responsibility System 99
7 Sublime Reason 117
8 Free Will Flourishes in the Absence of Mora! Responsibility 145
9 The Boojum of Creeping Exculpation 173
10 Punishment without Moral Responsibility 189
11 The Culture of Moral Responsibility 207
12 Myopic Moral Responsibility 233
13 Conclusion: How Stubborn Is Moral Responsibility? 253
Notes 265
References 269
index 289 |
any_adam_object | 1 |
author | Waller, Bruce N. |
author_facet | Waller, Bruce N. |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Waller, Bruce N. |
author_variant | b n w bn bnw |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV042200679 |
callnumber-first | B - Philosophy, Psychology, Religion |
callnumber-label | BJ1451 |
callnumber-raw | BJ1451 |
callnumber-search | BJ1451 |
callnumber-sort | BJ 41451 |
callnumber-subject | BJ - Ethics |
classification_rvk | CC 7200 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)904124665 (DE-599)BVBBV042200679 |
dewey-full | 170 |
dewey-hundreds | 100 - Philosophy & psychology |
dewey-ones | 170 - Ethics (Moral philosophy) |
dewey-raw | 170 |
dewey-search | 170 |
dewey-sort | 3170 |
dewey-tens | 170 - Ethics (Moral philosophy) |
discipline | Philosophie |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV042200679</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20151105</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">141120s2015 xxu |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">014013243</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780262028165</subfield><subfield code="c">hbk.</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-262-02816-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)904124665</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV042200679</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxu</subfield><subfield code="c">US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-M468</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">BJ1451</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">170</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CC 7200</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)17672:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Waller, Bruce N.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The stubborn system of moral responsibility</subfield><subfield code="c">Bruce N. Waller</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge, Massachusetts [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b"><<The>> MIT Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">X, 294 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The philosophical commitment to moral responsibility seems unshakable. But, argues Bruce Waller, the philosophical belief in moral responsibility is much stronger than the philosophical arguments in favor of it. Philosophers have tried to make sense of moral responsibility for centuries, with mixed results. Most contemporary philosophers insist that even conclusive proof of determinism would not and should not result in doubts about moral responsibility. Many embrace compatibilist views, and propose an amazing variety of competing compatibilist arguments for saving moral responsibility. In this provocative book, Waller examines the stubborn philosophical belief in moral responsibility, surveying the philosophical arguments for it but focusing on the system that supports these arguments: powerful social and psychological factors that hold the belief in moral responsibility firmly in place. Waller argues that belief in moral responsibility is not isolated but rather is a central element of a larger belief system; doubting or rejecting moral responsibility will involve major adjustments elsewhere in a wide range of beliefs and values. Belief in moral responsibility is one strand of a complex and closely woven fabric of belief, comprising threads from biology, psychology, social institutions, criminal justice, religion, and philosophy. These dense interconnections, Waller contends, make it very difficult to challenge the belief in moral responsibility at the center. They not only influence the philosophical arguments in favor of moral responsibility but also add powerful extraphilosophical support for it.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Responsibility</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Verantwortungsethik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4236475-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Verantwortungsethik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4236475-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Regensburg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027639564&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027639564</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV042200679 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-09-23T16:14:29Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9780262028165 |
language | English |
lccn | 014013243 |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027639564 |
oclc_num | 904124665 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-12 DE-M468 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR |
owner_facet | DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-12 DE-M468 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR |
physical | X, 294 S. |
publishDate | 2015 |
publishDateSearch | 2015 |
publishDateSort | 2015 |
publisher | <<The>> MIT Press |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Waller, Bruce N. Verfasser aut The stubborn system of moral responsibility Bruce N. Waller Cambridge, Massachusetts [u.a.] <<The>> MIT Press 2015 X, 294 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Includes bibliographical references and index The philosophical commitment to moral responsibility seems unshakable. But, argues Bruce Waller, the philosophical belief in moral responsibility is much stronger than the philosophical arguments in favor of it. Philosophers have tried to make sense of moral responsibility for centuries, with mixed results. Most contemporary philosophers insist that even conclusive proof of determinism would not and should not result in doubts about moral responsibility. Many embrace compatibilist views, and propose an amazing variety of competing compatibilist arguments for saving moral responsibility. In this provocative book, Waller examines the stubborn philosophical belief in moral responsibility, surveying the philosophical arguments for it but focusing on the system that supports these arguments: powerful social and psychological factors that hold the belief in moral responsibility firmly in place. Waller argues that belief in moral responsibility is not isolated but rather is a central element of a larger belief system; doubting or rejecting moral responsibility will involve major adjustments elsewhere in a wide range of beliefs and values. Belief in moral responsibility is one strand of a complex and closely woven fabric of belief, comprising threads from biology, psychology, social institutions, criminal justice, religion, and philosophy. These dense interconnections, Waller contends, make it very difficult to challenge the belief in moral responsibility at the center. They not only influence the philosophical arguments in favor of moral responsibility but also add powerful extraphilosophical support for it. Responsibility Verantwortungsethik (DE-588)4236475-9 gnd rswk-swf Verantwortungsethik (DE-588)4236475-9 s DE-604 Digitalisierung UB Regensburg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027639564&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
spellingShingle | Waller, Bruce N. The stubborn system of moral responsibility Responsibility Verantwortungsethik (DE-588)4236475-9 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4236475-9 |
title | The stubborn system of moral responsibility |
title_auth | The stubborn system of moral responsibility |
title_exact_search | The stubborn system of moral responsibility |
title_full | The stubborn system of moral responsibility Bruce N. Waller |
title_fullStr | The stubborn system of moral responsibility Bruce N. Waller |
title_full_unstemmed | The stubborn system of moral responsibility Bruce N. Waller |
title_short | The stubborn system of moral responsibility |
title_sort | the stubborn system of moral responsibility |
topic | Responsibility Verantwortungsethik (DE-588)4236475-9 gnd |
topic_facet | Responsibility Verantwortungsethik |
url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027639564&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wallerbrucen thestubbornsystemofmoralresponsibility |