Struktura osídlení v období popelnicových polí na střední Moravé:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | Czech |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Olomouc
Archeologické Centrum Olomouc
2013
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Archaeologiae regionalis fontes
12 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Abstract Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | Zsfassung in engl. Sprache |
| Beschreibung: | 128 S. zahlr. Ill., graph. Darst., Kt. |
| ISBN: | 9788086989259 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV042040891 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20160211 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 140825s2013 abd| |||| 00||| cze d | ||
| 020 | |a 9788086989259 |9 978-80-86989-25-9 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)894775063 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV042040891 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a cze | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-188 |a DE-M515 | ||
| 084 | |a 7,41 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Vránová, Vendula |d 1977- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1059382067 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Struktura osídlení v období popelnicových polí na střední Moravé |c Vendula Vránová |
| 264 | 1 | |a Olomouc |b Archeologické Centrum Olomouc |c 2013 | |
| 300 | |a 128 S. |b zahlr. Ill., graph. Darst., Kt. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Archaeologiae regionalis fontes |v 12 | |
| 500 | |a Zsfassung in engl. Sprache | ||
| 648 | 7 | |a Geschichte 1300 v. Chr.-800 v. Chr. |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Urnenfelderkultur |0 (DE-588)4062146-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Siedlung |0 (DE-588)4054858-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Mittelmähren |0 (DE-588)4282109-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Mittelmähren |0 (DE-588)4282109-5 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Urnenfelderkultur |0 (DE-588)4062146-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Siedlung |0 (DE-588)4054858-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Geschichte 1300 v. Chr.-800 v. Chr. |A z |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 830 | 0 | |a Archaeologiae regionalis fontes |v 12 |w (DE-604)BV021626903 |9 12 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027482150&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Abstract |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027482150&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027482150 | ||
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 307.09 |e 22/bsb |f 09013 |g 4371 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 307.09 |e 22/bsb |f 09014 |g 4371 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804152467563216896 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | Prameny | Seznam zkratek | Summary
PRAMENY
archiv AÚ AVČR Brno, NZ č.j. 1296/46
archiv AÚ AVČR Brho, NZ č.j. 98/48
archiv AÚ AV ČR Brno, NZ č.j. 147/52
archiv AÚ AVČR Brno, NZ č.j. 1437/55
archiv AÚ AVČR Brno, NZ č.j. 1205/70
Horka (pohřebiště) 1151/48, 119/82,1622/46,1941/46, 2628/56, 2641/56, 267/71, 839/50, 840/50
archiv AÚ AVČR Brno, NZ č.j. 455/48
archiv AÚ AVČR Brno, NZ č.j. 149/48
SEZNAM ZKRATEK
AR - Archeologické rozhledy
ACO ֊ Archeologické centrum Olomouc, p.o.
AÚ AV ČR - Archeologický ustav Akademie věd České republiky
ČVSMO - Časopis Vlasteneckého spolku muzejního v Olomouci
FAP - Fontes Archaelogiae Pragenses
GIS - geografické informační systémy
KVMO - Krajské vlastivědné muzeum v Olomouci
MKP ֊ Muzeum Komenského v Přerově
MPP - Muzeum Prostějovská v Prostějově
NPÚ ֊ Národní památkový ústav, územní odborné pracoviště v Olomouci
NZ ֊ nálezová zpráva
OSSPPOP - Okresní středisko státní památkové péče a ochrany přírody
PA ֊ Památky archeologické
PV - Přehled výzkumů
ÚAPP - Ústav archeologické památkové péče
VMO - Vlastivědné muzeum v Olomouci
VVM - Vlastivědný věstník moravský
VÚ - Vlastivědný ústav
Zprávy VÚ - Zprávy vlastivědného ústavu
ZVMO - Zprávy Vlastivědného muzea v Olomouci
Zprávy SLUKO - Zprávy Studijního a lidovýchovného ústavu kraje Olomouckého
SUMMARY
Introduction
The region of central Moravia, or the Upper Moravian Graben, represents one of the major prehistoric settlement
regions in the Czech Republic, which was continuously inhabited throughout the entire prehistoric period. Among
its stages which yielded most archaeological finds belongs the Urnfield Period, represented by the cultural complex
of Lusatian urnfields. Owing to the intensity and long tradition of archaeological research in central Moravia,
reaching back to the mid-1800 s, extensive source basis is available and a dense network of Urnfield sites of the Late
Bronze to Hallstatt Iron Age was documented. Nevertheless, acquired information has not yet been summarized
with the use of GIS methods and tools. The aim of this book is to at least partially complete archaeological knowledge
in this field, and, on the basis of conducted analyses, to define factors influencing the character of a settlement
between the Late Bronze and Hallstatt Iron Age; further, to define the general arrangement of a settlement of
a single community together with its economic background which, subsequently, provides basis for the assessment
of the stability of settlements and identification of a settlement structure on the entire territory under examination
during the Urnfield Period.
Definition and Characteristics of the Examined Territory
In the region of central Moravia, it is difficult to specify a geographically clearly defined territory. Therefore,
to examine the structure of Urnfield settlements, a landscape transect of 20 km x 20 km was artificially selected,
the north-south axis of which is formed by the Morava River and which has the city of Olomouc in its centre
(Fig.3). This transect includes several different landscapes with various géomorphologie, climatic and hydrological
conditions. Although the major part of the examined territory is formed by fertile soils of the Upper Moravia
Graben, the transect also reaches floodplain forests in the valley of the Morava River both to the north and south of
Olomouc and borders the foothills of the Lower Jeseniky Mountains in the northeast of Olomouc.
Bayerische
Staatsbibliothek
München
97
Summary
Definition of the Examined Period and Sources
The region of central Moravia between the Late Bronze and Hallstatt Iron Age belongs to the Lusatian cultural
area, here represented by the Lusatian Culture of the Late Bronze Age (BD-HA) and Silesian-Platënice Culture
of the Final Bronze (HB) and Hallstatt Iron Age (HC-HD/LTA). On a smaller part of the transect, formed by the
cadastre of the city of Olomouc, the continuity and stability of Urnfield settlement was examined in relation to the
previous period of the Middle Danube Tumulus Culture and subsequent (La Tène) Lusatian cultural complex.
Basic entry data for the settlement structure analysis was provided by 114 sites dated to the culture of Lusatian
and Silesian-Platënice urnfields, of which 64 were Late Bronze settlements, 44 were Final Bronze settlements and
46 were Hallstatt settlements (Figs. 5 and 13). The major part of the source basis was formed by lowland settlements
and burial grounds together with finds of five hoards of bronze tools and settlements on two higher locations.
Additional data was provided by 10 Middle Danube Tumulus sites and 15 La Tène sites.
Theoretical Background
The theoretical background of this work is based on methods and principles of settlement and spatial archaeology
and, in particular, the theory of settlement areas formulated by Evžen Neústupný (1986; 1991; 1994; 1998; 2001;
2010,141-182). A settlement area comprises all areas of activities of individual prehistoric communities, reflecting
a certain purpose or function (living, burying, storing, production, hunting, etc.) Settlement areas also include the
natural as well as human dimension; the latter including the practical, social and symbolic level (NEÚSTUPNÝ
1994, 251-252). The structure of settlement areas and areas of individual activities was based on the structure of
respective communities. Through the analysis and search for regularities (structures) in these areas, the settlement
area theory thus reveals also regularities ֊ structures of past human societies (NEÚSTUPNÝ 2010,154).
Methodology
The first step was to compile a list of Urnfield sites on the selected transect and Middle Bronze and La Tène sites
on the smaller area of the Olomouc cadastre, thus acquiring information necessary for subsequent analyses within
the GIS environment. Following necessary revision of rather diverse data and their unification (e.g. transferring
locations of earlier finds into the S-JTSK coordinate system), all sites were entered in digital maps.
GIS IDRISI Kilimanjaro software was used for the processing of spatial data. The starting point for visualisation
and subsequent analysis was the creation of a digital elevation model with the addition of the point layer of sites, to
whose attribute table were added collected values of monitored environmental elements. To monitor the relation
between the settlement and its external environment, digital maps of various environmental elements were also
created within the GIS. These included elevation, soil types, inclination and orientations of slopes or climatic areas
from which data was collected for the actual analysis. The layer of watercourses was created by means of editing the
current watercourse map in accordance with maps of the second military mapping (1836-1852); in several cases
data was specified also on the basis of maps from the first military mapping (1764-1768; http://oldmaps.geolab.
cl). The values of monitored elements were collected for site centres in order to balance the handicap of different
accuracy of site surveys.
Data Analysis and Synthesis
During the analysis, three major factors were examined: relation between the settlement and its natural
environment, arrangement of settlement areas and extent of the economic background of the settlement (modelling)
and settlement density and continuity.
The Relation between the Settlement and its Natural Environment
As regards the natural environment of Urnfield sites, the main objective of the analysis was to identify such
factors of natural environment affecting the location and structure of settlement areas within the landscape. The
following environmental elements were analysed: elevation, distance from water sources, terrain inclination, slope
orientation, climate, and pedology.
Several IDRISI software analytical tools were used (Spatial Analyst Tools, Proximity/Near, Extract Multi Values
to Points, Zonal Histogram and Zonal Statistics as Table), the data was subsequently entered into Microsoft Excel
tables and transferred into charts.
As environmental elements strongly affecting the arrangement of a settlement structure during the entire period
of the Lusatian cultural complex, as well as the Middle Bronze Age and La Téne Period, were identified: elevation,
distance from water sources, terrain inclination, and soil conditions. It is most likely that slope orientation was of
no importance. The influence of climatic conditions on the settlement can be seen only at the supra-regional level.
It may be also stated that Late and Final Bronze as well as Hallstatt communities had, in principal, same
requirements as regards the natural character of settlement areas. Most of the areas were established on agricultural
soils of good quality, in the altitude between 200 m and 250 m, within the distance of 500 m from a water source
and with slope inclination not exceeding 5°. Similar landscape character for settlement areas was also required by
people of the Middle Bronze Age and the La Tène Period.
The analysis of the relation between sites and their natural conditions also provided interesting results as
regards possible interpretation of reasons for depositing bronze hoards. The natural character of sites with such
98
Summary
hoards indicates their religious purpose ֊ on the one hand, striking proximity of all hoards to watercourses, or
marshes, and, on the other hand, two hoards outside the marshy ground yet in slopes and in the altitude of two
highest Urnfield sites within the examined transect. Deposition of the hoards had, most probably, a symbolic
ritualized significance.
The Arrangement of Settlement Areas and Extent of their Economic Background
The arrangement of settlement areas and extent of their economic background were analysed using the method
of settlement areas modelling (with the use of Distance/Path Distance and Surface/Contour tools).
Modelling enables archaeologists to obtain at least rudimentary knowledge of those aspects of life of prehistoric
communities where archaeological sources are otherwise lacking. Settlement areas of individual communities
were modelled on the basis of a qualified estimate of the size of one agricultural community and its economic
needs, while assuming its self-sufficiency and thus the necessity of accessibility of sources and effectiveness of their
movement within the landscape while addressing their daily needs (NEÚSTUPNÝ 1986, 231; 2010, 167, 247;
OSTOJA-ZAGÓRSKI 1987; SMRŽ 1994a, 383-384, 388; DRESLEROVÁ 1995; 1998, 123-124; KUNA 1997, 185;
2007, 121; DANIELISOVÁ 2010, 127-128; DRESLEROVÁ - VENCLOVÁ - DANIELISOVÁ 2010, 56).
As the economic distance, and thus the model size of a settlement area, a circle with a radius of 2 km was
established, which is a distance accessible within a 30-minute walk. Greater watercourses were considered ineffective
as regards daily crossing. On the basis of the previous analysis, it was thus concluded that the close neighbourhood
of settlements included sufficient space with convenient conditions for prehistoric economic activities. These
areas were transferred into polygons and depicted on the map where they were shown as territories of individual
settlement areas, thus forming an Urnfield settlement pattern within the examined territory (Figs. 20, 21, and 22).
A point layer of burial grounds was also added to these polygons. Such visualisation of space belonging to settlement
areas together with the location of individual burial grounds made it possible to widen the scope of the analysis
of the Urnfield settlement pattern and analyse locations of burial grounds in relation to the settlement areas of
individual communities.
As the Upper Moravian Graben provides favourable natural conditions, the established extent of a settlement
area within the general distance of 2 km from the kernel of the residential component proved sufficient as regards
its economic background that included activities necessary for self-sufficient communities such as production
areas, fields, pastures, and economically used woods. Areas of the highest settlement concentration could have
moved into a certain deficit as regards the required substantial forested space; nevertheless, this could have been
tackled via forest management on larger areas beyond settlement areas. Also, it is most likely that some settlements
within the areas of the highest settlement concentration were not inhabited at the same time. If it had been so, they
would have competed in their economic strategies and the means available for meeting their living needs would
not have been sufficient.
The analysis of locations of burial grounds indicated a considerable influence of factors at the social-symbolic
level. The examined structure of settlement areas clearly showed two preferred locations of burial grounds: at the
kernel of a settlement area and at the edge or at the borderline between two or more settlement areas. As regards
the former, it may have represented “family” burials within a single community; the latter indicates burial grounds
common for several communities and thus a certain kind of a supra-community area.
Based on the settlement area modelling method, the settlement structure of the entire Urnfield period appears
as a dense network of settlement areas which formed more or less continuous settlement belts - kernel areas along
larger watercourses and in the valleys of streams on gentle slopes of the territory between the Lower Jeseniky
Mountains and the Upper Moravian Graben. Territories of individual settlement areas were closely connected
in the major part of the inhabited area. The landscape potential was used to its maximum where the settlement
concentration was highest, i.e. where settlement areas continuously bordered one another. The settlement structure
did not change remarkably between the Late Bronze and the Hallstatt Iron Age, which indicates long-term stability
of its economic system and resembling structure of the society.
Continuity and Settlement Density
In connection with the Urnfield settlement structure, the density and continuity of settlement areas were also
examined.
For these analyses, the environment of GIS IDRISI Kilimanjaro was used again, in particular the Kernel
Density tool for calculation and mapping of the kernel density of the sites. The entry data was the point layer of
settlements and the most important parameter for the tool setting was the Search radius, i.e. the radius defining
a certain zone around the settlement, in this case the extent of a settlement area of a single community. Based on
a qualified estimate, for the purposes of the analysis the radius of 2,000 m was selected, which corresponds with
the average distance reached after a 30-minute walk. This method led to creation of two types of maps. The first
showed the intensity of the settlement density separately for individual periods of the Lusatian cultural complex,
and the intensity of settlement incidence per one square kilometre which is marked on a coloured scale (Figs. 23,
24, and 25). As regards the second, resulting values of the kernel density of settlement areas from all monitored time
periods were drawn in layers within one map (Fig.26). This map took into account only two kernel density intervals
- territories with no influence and the remaining territories, i.e. a certain catchment area of the settlement. This
map indicates the continuity of settlement areas, even continuity of the Urnfield settlement in its entirety.
99
Summary
This method demonstrated the continuity of Urnfield settlement at the level of settlement areas as well as
within the entire territory under examination. The analysis of both selected issues confirmed existence of several
settlement kernels with a dense network of settlement areas. These kernels were settled continuously during the
entire Lusatian cultural complex period and practically showed no difference in settlement density during all three
of its development phases. None of the areas under examination indicated any hiatus in the settlement during the
said time period.
On a smaller territory of the Olomouc cadastre, the continuity and settlement area structure was analysed within
a longer time span of the Middle Bronze Age until the La Tene Period. A similar trend in the settlement structure
could be seen during the entire period under examination, showing a dense network of settlement areas and
maximum use of landscape on the monitored territory which was a part of one of the kernel Urnfield territories.
The majority of settlement areas were also used continually during the entire period.
CONCLUSIONS
The selected methodology helped define, at least partially, ecologic, economic and social-symbolic factors
affecting the arrangement of Urnfield settlements.
It was verified that economic together with ecologic factors had substantial influence on the location of
a settlement area and thus on the overall settlement structure. To secure living needs in the agricultural prehistory,
sufficient extent of fields and economically used woods were essential to reach self-sufficiency of a community. To
a certain extent, the arrangement of settlement areas reflected the necessity of an adequately large background so
that the community living on the area could reach self-sufficiency, which, subsequently, eliminated competition
between individual settlement areas.
The location of burial grounds within the settlement structure was influenced by, more than anything else, factors
at the social-symbolic level. Obviously, their position was determined by the fact whether it was a burial ground
for one or more communities. Symbolic factors also influenced location of bronze hoards. It was ascertained that it
was Prflohyclosely related to the existence of a water source in the landscape and thus points indirectly at its ritual
character.
Generally, the basic arrangement and extent of an Urnfield settlement area was defined. A typical settlement
area between the Late Bronze and Hallstatt Iron Age was established on a territory with quality agricultural soil in
the altitude between 200 - 250 m, within a-few-minute walk from a water source, where a certain limit was set to
be 500 m, and in a terrain with no or minor inclination not exceeding 5°. The economic background necessary for
a self-sufficient community lied within an irregular circle of approx. 2 km from its kernel represented by a residential
area. Individual settlement areas were bordering one another where kernel areas were situated. Not all communities
included a burial ground within their settlement area. It is likely that some communities used burial grounds
common for more communities and these lied at the borderline between two or more settlement areas. If it was not
the case, the burial ground lied not far from the residential area.
It may be also stated that, to a certain extent, the general settlement region and its structure, with several kernel
areas of high density and continuity of settlement areas, was identified within the selected transect for the Urnfield
Period
The Urnfield settlement territory was thus formed by a rather compact cultural landscape with a mosaic of
residential and production areas, fields, pastures and meadows, sometimes passing into economically used woods,
with the addition of burial grounds and, certainly, other places of ritual character.
The settlement structure on this territory showed a significant stability during the entire Lusatian cultural
complex period. This points at a stable and sustainable economic system with no greater changes during the entire
period and at the similarity of the social system with no greater modifications in its organisational principles during
the Late and Final Bronze and Hallstatt Iron Age. This basically confirms conclusions reached by archaeologists
on the basis of the material culture and funeral rite, i.e. that verifiable changes within the Hallstatt society of the
Lusatian Urnfield cultural complex were not as distinctive as, for instance, on the neighbouring territories of the
Bylany or Horakov Culture and their character had no formative influence on the change of the overall settlement
structure.
100
OBSAH
1. ÚVOD ...........................................................................................5
2. DĚJINY BÁDÁNÍ
2.1. Dějiny archeologického bádání v regionu střední Moravy..........................................6
2.2. Stručný přehled dosavadního bádání řešené problematiky struktury pravěkého osídlení
a využití metod GIS v archeologii .............................................................8
3. METODIKA PRÁCE
3.1. Vymezení a charakteristika vybraného území.................................................... 10
3.1.1. Geomorfologie..................................................................................10
3.1.2. Geologická charakteristika ................................................................... 11
3.1.3. Pedologická charakteristika....................................................................11
3.1.4. Vodní toky ....................................................................................11
3.1.5. Klimatické poměry .............................................................................12
3.1.6. Vegetace.......................................................................................13
3.2. Vymezení studovaného období ...................................................................13
3.3. Metodický postup.............................................................................. 14
3.4. Teoretické základy práce.......................................................................15
4. CHARAKTERISTIKA LOKALIT
4.1. Mladší (BC/BD - HA2) a pozdní (HB) doba bronzová.............................................. 16
4.1.1. Pohřebiště ................................................................................... 16
4.1.2. Sídliště ..................................................................................... 20
4.1.3. Nálezy lidských skeletů a jejich částí v sídlištních objektech................................ 22
4.1.4. Depoty ....................................................................................... 23
4.2. Halštat (HC - HD/LTA) ........................................................................ 26
4.2.1. Pohřebiště ................................................................................... 27
4.2.2. Sídliště ..................................................................................... 29
4.2.3. Hradiska, výšinná sídliště.................................................................... 31
4.2.4. Depoty ....................................................................................... 31
4.3. Střední doba bronzová (BB1 - BC2)............................................................. 32
4.4. Latén (LTA - LTD) ............................................................................ 32
5. SOUPIS LOKALIT
5.1. Lokality mladší a pozdní doby bronzové ....................................................... 33
5.2. Lokality doby halštatské ..................................................................... 37
5.3. Lokality střední doby bronzové ............................................................... 40
5.4. Lokality doby laténské ....................................................................... 41
6. ANALÝZA A SYNTÉZA PROSTOROVÝCH DAT POMOCÍ NÁSTROJŮ GIS
6.1. Vztah sídelních areálů popelnicových polí к přírodnímu prostředí ............................. 42
6.1.1. Vztah к nadmořské výšce ...................................................................... 42
6.1.2. Vzdálenost od vodního zdroje...................................................................45
6.1.3. Svažitost terénu ..............................................................................48
6.1.4. Orientace svahu............................................................................... 50
6.1.5. Klima ........................................................................................ 51
6.1.6. Pedologické poměry.............................................................................52
6.1.7. Výsledky analýzy vztahu sídelních areálů к přírodnímu prostředí .............................. 54
6.2. Modelování sídelních areálů .................................................................. 55
6.2.1. Vytváření modelů v archeologii - teorie a předpoklady......................................... 55
6.2.2. Popis zvolené metody ..........................................................................56
6.2.3. Rozsah a dostupnost využívané plochy sídelních areálů - analýza a vyhodnocení................. 57
6.2.4. Shrnutí výsledků modelování sídelních areálů ..................................................62
6.3. Kontinuita a hustota osídlení................................................................. 62
6.3.1. Popis zvolené metody.......................................................................... 62
6.3.2. Hustota sídelních areálů ..................................................................... 66
6.3.3. Kontinuita osídlení........................................................................... 66
6.3.4. Shrnutí výsledků analýzy kontinuity osídlení.................................................. 68
6.4. Analýza stability osídlení od strední doby bronzové po dobu laténskou na Olomouckú . 68
6.4.1. Vztah sídelních areálu k přírodnímu prostředí....................................... 69
6.4.1.1. Vztah k nadmorské výšce........................................................... 69
6.4.1.2. Vzdálenost od vodního zdroje...................................................... 69
6.4.1.3. Svažitost terénu.................................................................. 70
6.4.1.4. Orientace svahu .................................................................. 71
6.4.1.5. Pedologické pomery................................................................ 72
6.4.1.6. Klima............................................................................. 72
6.4.1.7. Výsledky komparativní analýzy vlivu přírodních faktoru ........................... 72
6.4.2. Modelovaní a kontinuita sídelních areálu............................................ 73
6.4.3. Shrnutí výsledku analýzy stability osídlení střední doby bronzové až doby laténské . 74
7. Lukáš Marek: HODNOCENÍ STRUKTURY OSÍDLENÍ
POMOCI METOD PROSTOROVÉ STATISTIKY
7.1. Popis metod......................................................................... 75
7.2. Analýza prostorového uspořádání osídlení a jeho vývoj .............................. 76
7.3. Analýza vztahu mezi prostorovým uspořádáním osídlení a přírodními faktory.... 79
7.4. Summary ............................................................................ 84
8. ZÁVĚR............................................................................... 85
LITERATURA ................................................................................ 87
PRAMENY.................................................................................... 97
SEZNAM ZKRATEK ............................................................................ 97
SUMMARY ................................................................................... 97
PŘÍLOHY .................................................................................. 101
Příloha 1: Tabulka naměřených hodnot zkoumaných environmentálních faktorů pro lokality mladší a pozdní doby
bronzové a doby halštatské na střední Moravě.
Příloha 2: Tabulka naměřených hodnot zkoumaných environmentálních faktorů pro lokality střední doby bronzové
a doby laténské na katastru města Olomouce.
Příloha 3: Tabulka naměřených hodnot zkoumaných environmentálních faktorů pro lokality mladší a pozdní doby
bronzové a doby halštatské na katastru města Olomouce.
Mapa 1: Lokality na Olomouckú z období mladšího a mladšího/pozdního bronzu ve vztahu k nadmořské výšce.
Mapa 2: Lokality na Olomouckú z období pozdního bronzu ve vztahu k nadmořské výšce.
Mapa 3: Lokality na Olomouckú z období halštatu ve vztahu k nadmořské výšce.
Mapa 4: Lokality v Olomouci z období středního bronzu ve vztahu k nadmořské výšce.
Mapa 5: Lokality v Olomouci z období laténu ve vztahu k nadmořské výšce.
Mapa 6: Lokality na Olomouckú z období mladšího a mladšího/pozdního bronzu ve vztahu ke sklonu svahů.
Mapa 7: Lokality na Olomouckú z období pozdního bronzu ve vztahu ke sklonu svahů.
Mapa 8: Lokality na Olomouckú z období halštatu ve vztahu ke sklonu svahů.
Mapa 9: Lokality v Olomouci z období středního bronzu ve vztahu ke sklonu svahů.
Mapa 10: Lokality v Olomouci z období laténu ve vztahu ke sklonu svahů.
Mapa 11: Lokality na Olomouckú z období mladšího a mladšího/pozdního bronzu ve vztahu k orientaci svahů.
Mapa 12: Lokality na Olomouckú z období pozdního bronzu ve vztahu k orientaci svahů.
Mapa 13: Lokality na Olomouckú z období halštatu ve vztahu k orientaci svahů.
Mapa 14: Lokality v Olomouci z období středního bronzu ve vztahu k orientaci svahů.
Mapa 15: Lokality v Olomouci z období laténu ve vztahu k orientaci svahů.
Mapa 16: Lokality na Olomouckú z období mladšího a mladšího/pozdního bronzu ve vztahu k typům půd.
Mapa 17: Lokality na Olomouckú z období pozdního bronzu ve vztahu k typům půd.
Mapa 18: Lokality na Olomouckú z období halštatu ve vztahu k typům půd.
Mapa 19: Lokality v Olomouci z období středního bronzu ve vztahu k typům půd.
Mapa 20: Lokality v Olomouci z období laténu ve vztahu k typům půd.
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Vránová, Vendula 1977- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1059382067 |
| author_facet | Vránová, Vendula 1977- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Vránová, Vendula 1977- |
| author_variant | v v vv |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV042040891 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)894775063 (DE-599)BVBBV042040891 |
| era | Geschichte 1300 v. Chr.-800 v. Chr. gnd |
| era_facet | Geschichte 1300 v. Chr.-800 v. Chr. |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02187nam a2200469 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV042040891</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20160211 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">140825s2013 abd| |||| 00||| cze d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9788086989259</subfield><subfield code="9">978-80-86989-25-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)894775063</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV042040891</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">cze</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-M515</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">7,41</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vránová, Vendula</subfield><subfield code="d">1977-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1059382067</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Struktura osídlení v období popelnicových polí na střední Moravé</subfield><subfield code="c">Vendula Vránová</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Olomouc</subfield><subfield code="b">Archeologické Centrum Olomouc</subfield><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">128 S.</subfield><subfield code="b">zahlr. Ill., graph. Darst., Kt.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Archaeologiae regionalis fontes</subfield><subfield code="v">12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zsfassung in engl. Sprache</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1300 v. Chr.-800 v. Chr.</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Urnenfelderkultur</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4062146-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Siedlung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4054858-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Mittelmähren</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4282109-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Mittelmähren</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4282109-5</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Urnenfelderkultur</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4062146-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Siedlung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4054858-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1300 v. Chr.-800 v. Chr.</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Archaeologiae regionalis fontes</subfield><subfield code="v">12</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV021626903</subfield><subfield code="9">12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027482150&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027482150&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027482150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">307.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09013</subfield><subfield code="g">4371</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">307.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09014</subfield><subfield code="g">4371</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Mittelmähren (DE-588)4282109-5 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Mittelmähren |
| id | DE-604.BV042040891 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T01:11:11Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9788086989259 |
| language | Czech |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027482150 |
| oclc_num | 894775063 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-188 DE-M515 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-188 DE-M515 |
| physical | 128 S. zahlr. Ill., graph. Darst., Kt. |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| publishDateSearch | 2013 |
| publishDateSort | 2013 |
| publisher | Archeologické Centrum Olomouc |
| record_format | marc |
| series | Archaeologiae regionalis fontes |
| series2 | Archaeologiae regionalis fontes |
| spelling | Vránová, Vendula 1977- Verfasser (DE-588)1059382067 aut Struktura osídlení v období popelnicových polí na střední Moravé Vendula Vránová Olomouc Archeologické Centrum Olomouc 2013 128 S. zahlr. Ill., graph. Darst., Kt. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Archaeologiae regionalis fontes 12 Zsfassung in engl. Sprache Geschichte 1300 v. Chr.-800 v. Chr. gnd rswk-swf Urnenfelderkultur (DE-588)4062146-7 gnd rswk-swf Siedlung (DE-588)4054858-2 gnd rswk-swf Mittelmähren (DE-588)4282109-5 gnd rswk-swf Mittelmähren (DE-588)4282109-5 g Urnenfelderkultur (DE-588)4062146-7 s Siedlung (DE-588)4054858-2 s Geschichte 1300 v. Chr.-800 v. Chr. z DE-604 Archaeologiae regionalis fontes 12 (DE-604)BV021626903 12 Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027482150&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Abstract Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027482150&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Vránová, Vendula 1977- Struktura osídlení v období popelnicových polí na střední Moravé Archaeologiae regionalis fontes Urnenfelderkultur (DE-588)4062146-7 gnd Siedlung (DE-588)4054858-2 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4062146-7 (DE-588)4054858-2 (DE-588)4282109-5 |
| title | Struktura osídlení v období popelnicových polí na střední Moravé |
| title_auth | Struktura osídlení v období popelnicových polí na střední Moravé |
| title_exact_search | Struktura osídlení v období popelnicových polí na střední Moravé |
| title_full | Struktura osídlení v období popelnicových polí na střední Moravé Vendula Vránová |
| title_fullStr | Struktura osídlení v období popelnicových polí na střední Moravé Vendula Vránová |
| title_full_unstemmed | Struktura osídlení v období popelnicových polí na střední Moravé Vendula Vránová |
| title_short | Struktura osídlení v období popelnicových polí na střední Moravé |
| title_sort | struktura osidleni v obdobi popelnicovych poli na stredni morave |
| topic | Urnenfelderkultur (DE-588)4062146-7 gnd Siedlung (DE-588)4054858-2 gnd |
| topic_facet | Urnenfelderkultur Siedlung Mittelmähren |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027482150&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027482150&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV021626903 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT vranovavendula strukturaosidlenivobdobipopelnicovychpolinastrednimorave |