Nauka na Vostoke SSSR v uslovijach industrializacionnoj paradigmy:
Наука на Востоке СССР в условиях индустриализационной парадигмы
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | Russian |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Novosibirsk
NP Akad. Izdat. "Geo" INGG SO RAN
2012
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Abstract |
| Beschreibung: | PT: Science on the East of the USSR under the paradigm of industrialisation. - In kyrill. Schr., russ. - Zsfassung in engl. Sprache Includes bibliographical references |
| Beschreibung: | 346 pages graph. Darst. 21 cm |
| ISBN: | 9785974701825 5974701828 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV042006039 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20150507 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 140801s2012 d||| |||| 00||| rus d | ||
| 020 | |a 9785974701825 |9 978-5-9747-0182-5 | ||
| 020 | |a 5974701828 |9 5-9747-0182-8 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)910513245 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV042006039 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a rus | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a 7,41 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |6 880-01 |a Vodičev, Evgenij Grigorʹevič |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)132408856 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |6 880-02 |a Nauka na Vostoke SSSR v uslovijach industrializacionnoj paradigmy |c E. G. Vodičev |
| 246 | 1 | 3 | |a Science on the East of the USSR under the paradigm of industrialisation |
| 264 | 1 | |6 880-03 |a Novosibirsk |b NP Akad. Izdat. "Geo" INGG SO RAN |c 2012 | |
| 300 | |a 346 pages |b graph. Darst. |c 21 cm | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a PT: Science on the East of the USSR under the paradigm of industrialisation. - In kyrill. Schr., russ. - Zsfassung in engl. Sprache | ||
| 500 | |a Includes bibliographical references | ||
| 648 | 7 | |a Sozialgeschichte 1930-1970 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research / Soviet Union / History | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research / Russia (Federation) / Siberia / History | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Research |2 fast | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Geschichte | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Industrialisierung |0 (DE-588)4026776-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Wissenschaftspolitik |0 (DE-588)4140181-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Wirtschaftswachstum |0 (DE-588)4066527-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Russia (Federation) / Siberia |2 fast | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Soviet Union |2 fast | |
| 651 | 4 | |a Sowjetunion | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Sibirien |0 (DE-588)4054780-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Sibirien |0 (DE-588)4054780-2 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Wissenschaftspolitik |0 (DE-588)4140181-5 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Industrialisierung |0 (DE-588)4026776-3 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Wirtschaftswachstum |0 (DE-588)4066527-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a Sozialgeschichte 1930-1970 |A z |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027447982&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027447982&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Abstract |
| 880 | 1 | |6 100-01/(N |a Водичев, Е. Г |a ut | |
| 880 | 1 | 0 | |6 245-02/(N |a Наука на Востоке СССР в условиях индустриализационной парадигмы |c Е. Г. Водичев |
| 880 | 1 | |6 264-03/(N |a Новосибирск |b ГЕО | |
| 940 | 1 | |f sla | |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027447982 | ||
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 306.09 |e 22/bsb |f 0904 |g 57 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 370.9 |e 22/bsb |f 0904 |g 57 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 909 |e 22/bsb |f 0904 |g 57 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 330.09 |e 22/bsb |f 0904 |g 57 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804152419079159808 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | ОГЛАВЛЕНИЕ
Технократический социализм и трансформационные дилеммы.
Вместо предисловия
.................................... 5
Глава
1.
СОВЕТСКАЯ НАУЧНАЯ ПОЛИТИКА: МЕТАМОРФОЗЫ
ЭВОЛЮЦИИ
................................................ 21
1.1.
Формирование индустриализационной парадигмы
развития науки: точки отсчета
.......................
1.2.
Наука в системе государственных приоритетов в середине
1940-х-первой половине 1950-х гг.
................... 59
1.3.
Ветер перемен. Советская научная политика времен
хрущевского десятилетия
........................... 91
Глава
2.
ВОСТОЧНЫЙ ВЕКТОР В АКАДЕМИЧЕСКИХ СТРАТЕГИЯХ
.... 135
2.1.
В русле прежних традиций. Филиалы АН СССР на востоке
страны
..........................................
2.2.
Новая парадигма научно-организационных решений:
феномен СО АН СССР
............................. 160
Глава
3.
ОТРАСЛЕВАЯ НАУКА: ИНЕРЦИЯ ТРАДИЦИЙ И ШАНС ДЛЯ
ПЕРЕМЕН
................................................. 211
3.1.
Наука и ведомственные вертикали: пределы эффективности
индустриализационных моделей
.....................
3.2.
Ведомственная наука и реформы управления:
территориальный аспект
........................... 234
Глава
4.
ВЫСШАЯ ШКОЛА КАК ПОДСИСТЕМА НАУКИ: СТАРЫЕ
ДОГМЫ И НОВЫЕ ПОДХОДЫ
................................. 263
4.1.
Сибирская периферия. Вузы Сибири накануне
«оттепели»
..........................................
4.2.
Попытки реформ и проблемы статуса
................ 285
Заключение. Путь от иллюзий до реалий... и наоборот
........ 327
Summary
.............................................. 339
Contents
...............................................
CONTENTS
Technocratie
Socialism
and the Dilemmas of Transformation.
Introductory Note
..................................... 5
Chapter
1.
SOVIET SCIENCE POLICY: THE METAMORPHOSES
OF EVOLUTION
........................................ 21
1.1.
Formation of the Industrialisation Paradigm of the
Development of Science: Starting Points
................
1.2.
Science in the System of the State Priorities in the Middle
of mOs-First
Haif
of
1950s.......................... 59
1.3.
The Wind of Change. Soviet Science Policy in the Decade
of Nikita Khrushchev
................................ 91
Chapter
2.
THE EASTERN VECTOR OF THE ACADEMIC STRATEGIES
. . 135
2.1.
Continuing Traditions of the Past. Branches of the USSR
Academy of Sciences on the East of the Country
..........
2.2.
New Paradigm in the Organisation of Science: The Phenomenon
of the Siberian Branch of the USSR Academy of Sciences
... 160
Chapter
3.
MINISTERIAL SCIENCE: INERTIA OF TRADITIONS AND CHANCE
FOR A CHANGE
........................................ 211
3.1.
Science and Departmental Barriers: the Limits of Effectiveness
of the Industrial Models
..............................
3.2.
Ministerial Science and Reforms of the State Administration:
the Territorial Aspects
................................ 234
Chapter
4.
HIGHER EDUCATIONAL ESTABLISHMENTS AS A SUBSYSTEM
OF SCIENCE: OLD DOGMAS AND NEW APPROACHES
........... 263
4.1.
Siberian Periphery. Higher Educational Establishments
of Siberia on the Eve of the Khrushchev s Thaw
..........
4.2.
The Attempts of Reforms and the Problem
of Status
.......................................... 285
Conclusion. A Way from the Illusions to Reality... and Back
....... 327
Summary
............................................... 339
St39ííb;bi¡othe5<
M
ürs
c hen j
_________
У
SUMMARY
Paul
Josephson,
a famous American historian of science, once noted
that in World War II the relationship between scientists and the state
changed forever 1. We are not going to challenge this formulation. It is fully
appropriate to the Big Science which got a major push for development
because of the war. As we all know, in the leading countries of the world it
was exactly the Big Science phenomenon that determined perspectives of
the military technology and transition to the new stage of the technological
development. However, science became a productive force , as formulated
by the Marxist philosophers, long before that. The processes of
modernization ongoing for several centuries provide evidences that science,
professional education and technology became the major drivers of the
industrial society yet at the earlier stage but greatly stimulated post-
industrial transformations.
This logic is certainly applicable to Russia although with important
specifics and peculiarities. After the Bolsheviks revolution science received
a very dubious and contradictory status. Bolsheviks did not trust science
and scientists with their relativity consciousness understanding, however,
that economic growth was hardly possible without technological progress
to be based on fruits of scientific investigations. This contradiction was duly
considered in the Bolsheviks theory of modernization that determined their
attitude to science. In fact, the Soviet science policy in its key components
was based on the Bolsheviks concept of manageable society and was
shaped and fine-tuned on the basis of the modernization doctrine of
1930s.
This strategy set up the framework and limits for the national research and
development (R&D), and caused formation of the specific social institute of
science including the system of organization, administering and managing
of science and technology (S&T). Through 1940S-1960-S such a system
was developing in order to respond to the new challenges and the changing
military,
geostrategic and socio-economic context. These were the years
after World War II when the critical mass of transformations in the Soviet
S&T policy took place. In the meantime even after they had occurred, the
1
Paul R.
Josephson.
Totalitarian Science and Technology. 2nd Edition. New York,
Humanity Books,
2005,
p.
11.
340
Sammary
system of managing of science preserved its basic components and it
remained so up to the collapse of the USSR in
1991.
Communist doctrine of the social role of science determined the Soviet
science policy through a number of concrete management decisions and
institutional changes. In a narrow sense of the word we consider science
policy as an amalgamation of basic principles the state formulates with
regards to science together with economic, organization, administrative
and ideological measures oriented at their practical implementation. In the
USSR S&T policy was formed as more or less balanced synthesis of the
nationwide, departmental (or branch) and regional policies.
For the states with huge territories the problem of regionalization of
R&D and territorial aspects of S&T are always acute. A search for an
effective model of distribution of the research potential along its territory
became one the key components of the Soviet science policy leading to
optimization of the research network with the engaged personnel.
Since early
1930s
a vector of socio-economic development in the
Soviet Union has received stronger orientation to the Eastern periphery of
the country as its geostrategic and economic ambitions and perspectives
were now connected with these territories. Respectively both in theory and
in practice the territorial aspects of the Soviet S&T policy can be much
better crystallized on the East than in other regions of Russia. This is the
major argument that predetermined selection of Siberia as the territorial
focus of our research.
As for the chronological accents, they are mostly limited with two
decades in the middle of the 20th century
-
the period after the end of World
War II and till the beginning of
1970s.
These were the years when the Big
Science got its full strength and impact responding to the challenges of late
industrialism and new trends of post-industrial society. S&T became the
key instruments for solving the most important issues of military, strategic
and economic character. Consequently, in this period the science policy
was separated as a specific quasi-independent direction of the Soviet
socio-economic policy.
In parallel, science continued its move to the East. Long-term
economic strategies provided for the accelerated development of the
eastern territories of Russia. According to the Soviet motto of that period,
Siberia was supposed to be conquered , and this objective should have
been reached on the basis of achievements of modern science and
technology. In Soviet realities of late
1950s
and early
1960s
the two theses
of conquering science and conquering Siberia were surprisingly
amalgamated.
In the meantime, it would not be correct to say that by the middle of
the 20th century Siberia remained a virgin land in respect of science.
A Way from the Illusions to Reality... and Back
341
Modern science has been represented in Siberia since the time when the
Tomsk University was opened in
1888.
The regional science got a new
push in
1
930s and during World War II. However, the accumulated research
potential neither duly correlated with public hopes, as well as with the
expectations of the scientific community, nor it was appropriate to settle
acute socio-economic and technological tasks of the time. The illusions
referring to the possibilities of science projected to the development of the
Eastern regions of the USSR were yet to be transformed into realities and
practices of the S&T policy.
It is worth to underline that in the first half of the 20th century Soviet
system of management of science with its strict hierarchy and vertical
barriers reflecting functionality of specific economic and non-economic
branches was projected to the region. Science policy was mostly elaborated
by the central party and state agencies with involvement of respective
ministries and modest participation of the regions. No innovations took
place in the regional system of the R&D administration in the second half of
1940s.
However, ten years after the situation drastically changed. In this
period which is known as a dramatic and contradictory epoch of the
Khrushchev s Thaw , the R&D potential of Siberia reached a much higher
status. Important changes happened in all sectors of science but mostly in
the system of academic institutions. The powerful regional centre of
research
-
the Siberian Branch of the USSR Academy of Sciences (now
Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
-
SB
RAS)
-
was set
up here, and shortly it got leading positions in some fields of R&D not just in
Russia but in the world science. The experience of the SB
RAS
formation
impacted and accelerated setting up a system of science towns in other
parts of the country and also attracted a high interest abroad.
The organisation of the SB
RAS
symbolised a new configuration of
national science and redistribution of the academic potential on the territory
of the USSR. The role of the Eastern regions in R&D substantially
strengthened. The character of research in the academic institutions
located in Siberia radically changed. If previously these were peripheral
institutions focused on regional study the new institutes of the SB
RAS
got
an image of the most progressive and perspective teams in terms of their
R&D focus and quality of research.
Having obtained respective legal, institutional, financial, intellectual
and information capabilities, the SB
RAS
demonstrated a new level of
regional coordination and administration on the academic scene of Siberia.
The impact of the academic science on the rest of the R&D institutions
located on the East of the country increased greatly as well. Creation of the
SB
RAS de-facto
transformed science into one of the most important
spheres of the economic activity in the Siberian region.
342
Sammary
We believe, however, that there is a paradox connected with the SB
RAS
phenomenon, and our research supported this hypothesis. While
being a novelty the SB
RAS
did not undermine backbones of the R&D
management in the country and well integrated into the Soviet hierarchical
S&T system. It became an intermediary point between the centre ,
Moscow, and the Eastern scientific periphery . In this sense the SB
RAS
was an instrument of harmonizing the increased trends of regionalization in
science with the existing R&D system and previous paradigm of its
development. The new centre of science, as it was set in Novosibirsk,
immediately started forming its own R&D periphery and therefore
contributed to the reproduction of the existing R&D system at the updated
level just timely levelling some of its internal contradictions. Polycentric
model of organization of science did not adequately correlate with the
matrix of the Soviet society, even slightly democratized at the time of the
Khrushchev s Thaw .
In the meantime, the transformations of the academic system in the
region can be assessed as very significant, in some aspects
-
revolutionary.
Contrary to the academic sector, the branch science and the higher school
system did not transform so radically, although there were substantial
changes as well. These were the economic priorities which determined the
evolution of the branch sector of science. Territorial shift in the Soviet
economic policy became the major determinant of the R&D development.
As a results, the capacity of the branch science increased in the region to
the end of
1960s,
and in its key elements the formation of the branch R&D
network in Siberia by the beginning of
1970s
was completed. The structure
of the branch science network was strengthened with the research institutes
which became the basic type of the R&D institutions in the regions.
Respectively, the research orientation of the branch R&D system received
closer correlations with the economic profile and geographic displacement
of the industrial enterprises.
Meanwhile, the capacity of the regional R&D branch system was not
able to respond to the accelerated rate of growth of the institutional network.
In particular, it is evidenced by the fact that the qualification level of the
research personnel in such institutions which was not too high even in the
previous years, substantially dropped down by the end of
1960s.
The
system of training inside the regional branch R&D system was not able to
cope with the increased demand. In the meantime, the problem could not
be solved by importing researchers from other territories of the country. A
number of efforts were undertaken to remove some branch R&D institutions
from the centre of Russia to Siberia but they resulted in substantial losses
of personnel as specialists did not want to go to another place of
residence.
A Way from the Illusions to Reality.
.,
and Back
343
The higher school system faced the similar problems, and some of
them were even more acute. The growth of the higher educational
institutions network also took place in the region but at much smaller extent
against the branch science and the academic science systems. Moreover,
the results of our research indicate that for the university system the
proclaimed shift to the East happened to be just a theory. There were
many attempts made to accelerate this process but they were not really
successful, and many new regional higher school institutions remained
very weak and de-facto did not perform any R&D.
The configuration of the regional network of the higher educational
establishments did not correlate with demands of the regional economics
and social practices. In many cases the principle of appropriateness was
not properly considered when new institutions of higher school were built in
the region. Instead, it was substituted by the ambitions of the regional
authorities who wanted to see new institutions located on the territories
under their management since it was considered as an indication of a
successful region .
As a result, although some
50%
of total R&D personnel of Siberia
were employed in the higher education establishments, their real
engagement into research activity was much lower. The overall situation in
the Soviet higher school did not stimulate the development of research.
The institutions of this system did not possess necessary infrastructure and
equipment. Moreover, the higher school personnel overloaded with training
obligations did not demonstrate any desire to participate in the research.
It did not mean that there were no any positive changes in the
university sector of science in Siberia. On the contrary, a good progress
took place by the end of
1950s -
beginning of
1960s.
New institutional
forms of the R&D activity were elaborated and introduced in the higher
school, and so called Problem and Branch Laboratories appeared in the
structure of the most advanced establishments. However, they could not
change the situation radically. This is important to underline that the best
results were achieved in the university research institutes which were set
up not in the middle of
1950s
but much earlier, yet in
1920s.
The
development of R&D in Tomsk University and Tomsk Technological Institute
is a good example of that. In fact, only these two institutions became a
basis for a formation of a true research complex in the university science
system in Siberia.
In the meantime, our research provides for a conclusion that despite
all constrains the potential of science as a whole substantially increased in
Siberia between the end of
1940s
and the beginning of
1970s.
In these
years the regional S&T complex was developing with the accelerated rates
of growth against the country in large. Consequently its role in the nation-
344
Sammary
wide balance of R&D increased. This growth did not lead, however, to the
parity in a weight of Siberia in industrial and research performance. The
share of the region in industrial production was bigger than its share in
producing the R&D outputs.
Less success was achieved in reshaping administration and
coordination of research on the East of Russia. A shift to the territorial
principles in the economic management which is associated with so called
Sovnarkhozes (Councils of Economic Management,
CEM,
introduced in
1957)
entailed similar experiments in the Soviet S&T system. They,
however, were implemented within the existing sectors of science and did
not try to overcome their limits. As mentioned above, the most advanced
was the reform in the academic sector of research connected with the
formation of the SB
RAS.
This reform dealt with a huge territory of Siberia
and Far East. The SB
RAS as a
scientific leader was oriented mostly at
fundamental research and at R&D in the interests of the military industrial
complex. As a consequence it had a region-free orientation of research.
The SB
RAS
existed as a state inside the state and
de
facto remained
independent from all other sectors of science and intrusions of regional
administrations.
Some efforts to set up new structures of regional coordination of
research were also undertaken in the sector of higher school. They were
connected with the establishment of the territorial branches of the Science
and Technological Council related to the Ministry of Higher Education. In
the meantime, these new agencies were not practice-driven and finally
failed.
The relations between the administrations of Siberian regions and the
branch sector of science were undoubtedly closer due to the deeper
regional orientation of the branch R&D. After Sovnarkhozes were
established some part of the branch S&T institutions was transferred under
the direct subordination of local economic councils. However, those
transferred were not numerous, and the most powerful segment of the R&D
institutes still remained under the responsibilities of the central
administration. The Sovnarkhoz reform did not touch industrial enterprises
and the S&T institutions of the military industrial complex that was one of
the key reasons for the failure of this experiment.
Thus, the Khrushchev s reforms did not result in the formation of a
multi-sectorial, complex and efficient system of coordination in the branch
R&D not talking about the overall system of the regional S&T. Local
Economic Councils did not have neither legislative nor financial capabilities
to do so. Moreover, our research indicates that they did not properly
understand the necessity for the regional coordination of R&D. Even in the
period of territorial reforms in the economic management the tendencies
A Way from the Illusions to Reality.
..
and Back
345
for the centralized administering still dominated over the branch S&T
system.
Surprisingly enough in the years of the organizational chaos connected
with the Khrushchev s reforms, these were the CPSU committees capable
to perform a function of the integrator of interests between different sectors
of science in the region. Only there, in the party system, management links
of the three sectors of science could be somehow harmonised. However,
this channel of management did not do its best to elaborate a balanced
regional science policy. Its activities at the regional and local levels were
mostly focused on resolution of concrete situations and bottlenecks.
However, potential capability of the party agencies in the regional system of
the administration of science should not be exaggerated. It was an external
channel of intervention which inevitably brought to science its own
understanding of appropriateness of administrative measures to be
undertaken and specific bureaucratic culture of management which could
not be fully accepted in the R&D sphere.
In general, our research shows that for the period of the second half of
1940s -
beginning of
1970s
the term Siberian Research Complex is not
fully applicable to the Siberian S&T institutions. This category can only be
used in the context of localization of some R&D structures in the region and
not in a sense of harmonization of their research orientations and focus to
the regional socio-economic, technological and
socio-cultural
demands.
R&D institutions belonging to the different sectors of science had weak
communication links and were divided with high departmental barriers
which were not destroyed by the administrative reforms.
Despite all said above, in the Khrushchev s years the trends to the
regionalization of R&D received a good push and the S&T system stepped
forward in Siberia. In this respect the formation of the SB
RAS
became a
clear success: it was a breakthrough in the field of regionalization where
new approaches to the science policy and the regional system of the
coordination of S&T were introduced. However, all other efforts in this
direction were blocked and/or hampered. The main reason for that was the
fact that the processes of regionalization of R&D under Nikita Khrushchev
developed in the framework of the highly centralized and hierarchical state.
The Khrushchev s Thaw meant just a cosmetic reconstruction of the
authoritarian regime and left the administrative system without substantial
change of its fundamental background. These were political reasons which
became the main drivers of the Khrushchev s reforms in science and
economics. At the end of
1950s -
beginning of
1960s
it was the politics
which was the major factor and stimulus of decentralization. As a result it
led to the formation of mechanisms of the external regulation of R&D.
Consequently the science system was reformed with utilisation of such
346
Sammary
means and instruments which could not cause profound reorganization
neither in S&T nor in the economics as a whole.
The Khrushchev s palliative reforms brought about dissatisfaction,
irritation and mutiny among central bureaucracy. They lasted for several
years only and were interrupted in the second half of
1960s
after political
death of their initiator. The tendencies of tough centralized administering
re-emerged and became predominant in the system of R&D management.
For some time the tiredness of unsuccessful reforms and fear of the new
chaos prevented regional authorities and scientific establishment from a
search for a new mechanism of inter-sectorial regional coordination. The
result of that was further sharpening of the existing conflict between the
vertical mechanisms of the R&D administration and the objective demand
for the
regionalisation.
By the beginning of
1
970s the Soviet S&T system faced new economic,
technological and societal challenges but preserved all basic elements and
components of the highly centralized system of management of R&D, as
well as an outdated model of relationship between R&D and the economy
as a whole. In a sense of its economic structure and principles of the
economic management the country still remained in the framework of the
modernization paradigm of the early
1930s.
Some minor corrections and
amendments were introduced but they did not change the system in large
-
this model was more and more lagging behind.
Thus, despite the fact that many solutions in the sphere of organization
and management of science both at the nationwide level and in Siberia in
particular executed in
1950s
and
1960s
had a reasonable logic they
remained unimplemented and/or partially implemented. The exception was
the SB
RAS
phenomenon in the academic sector of science. Neither
economic and S&T establishment, nor the Soviet administration as a whole
happened to use their chances to pick up the last train going to the stations
of the new stage of development. Radical, not partial, limited and
contradictory reforms in economics and S&T were needed for that. There
was no any station where the routes of the authoritarian socialism and the
post-industrial society could cross. In this sense the Khrushchev s epoch
well demonstrated ineffectiveness of the palliative decisions. The
experiments carried out in this decade just showed up how dangerous it
was to stay on the middle of the road. The beginning of
1970s,
a quarter of
century after the end of World War II and formation of Big Science, and
some twenty years after collapse of the Stalin s coercive system,
symbolised the termination of the epoch of illusions and expectations
connected with science and technocratic thinking which were not able to
turn realities in the USSR.
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Vodičev, Evgenij Grigorʹevič |
| author_GND | (DE-588)132408856 |
| author_facet | Vodičev, Evgenij Grigorʹevič |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Vodičev, Evgenij Grigorʹevič |
| author_variant | e g v eg egv |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV042006039 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)910513245 (DE-599)BVBBV042006039 |
| era | Sozialgeschichte 1930-1970 gnd |
| era_facet | Sozialgeschichte 1930-1970 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03137nam a2200661 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV042006039</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20150507 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">140801s2012 d||| |||| 00||| rus d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9785974701825</subfield><subfield code="9">978-5-9747-0182-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5974701828</subfield><subfield code="9">5-9747-0182-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)910513245</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV042006039</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">rus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">7,41</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="6">880-01</subfield><subfield code="a">Vodičev, Evgenij Grigorʹevič</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)132408856</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="6">880-02</subfield><subfield code="a">Nauka na Vostoke SSSR v uslovijach industrializacionnoj paradigmy</subfield><subfield code="c">E. G. Vodičev</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Science on the East of the USSR under the paradigm of industrialisation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="6">880-03</subfield><subfield code="a">Novosibirsk</subfield><subfield code="b">NP Akad. Izdat. "Geo" INGG SO RAN</subfield><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">346 pages</subfield><subfield code="b">graph. Darst.</subfield><subfield code="c">21 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PT: Science on the East of the USSR under the paradigm of industrialisation. - In kyrill. Schr., russ. - Zsfassung in engl. Sprache</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Sozialgeschichte 1930-1970</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Research / Soviet Union / History</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Research / Russia (Federation) / Siberia / History</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Research</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Geschichte</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Industrialisierung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4026776-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Wissenschaftspolitik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4140181-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Wirtschaftswachstum</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4066527-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Russia (Federation) / Siberia</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Soviet Union</subfield><subfield code="2">fast</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sowjetunion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Sibirien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4054780-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Sibirien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4054780-2</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Wissenschaftspolitik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4140181-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Industrialisierung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4026776-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Wirtschaftswachstum</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4066527-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sozialgeschichte 1930-1970</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027447982&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027447982&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="880" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="6">100-01/(N</subfield><subfield code="a">Водичев, Е. Г</subfield><subfield code="a">ut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="880" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="6">245-02/(N</subfield><subfield code="a">Наука на Востоке СССР в условиях индустриализационной парадигмы</subfield><subfield code="c">Е. Г. Водичев</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="880" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="6">264-03/(N</subfield><subfield code="a">Новосибирск</subfield><subfield code="b">ГЕО</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="f">sla</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027447982</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">306.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0904</subfield><subfield code="g">57</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">370.9</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0904</subfield><subfield code="g">57</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">909</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0904</subfield><subfield code="g">57</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">330.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0904</subfield><subfield code="g">57</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Russia (Federation) / Siberia fast Soviet Union fast Sowjetunion Sibirien (DE-588)4054780-2 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Russia (Federation) / Siberia Soviet Union Sowjetunion Sibirien |
| id | DE-604.BV042006039 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T01:10:24Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9785974701825 5974701828 |
| language | Russian |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027447982 |
| oclc_num | 910513245 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 346 pages graph. Darst. 21 cm |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| publishDateSearch | 2012 |
| publishDateSort | 2012 |
| publisher | NP Akad. Izdat. "Geo" INGG SO RAN |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | 880-01 Vodičev, Evgenij Grigorʹevič Verfasser (DE-588)132408856 aut 880-02 Nauka na Vostoke SSSR v uslovijach industrializacionnoj paradigmy E. G. Vodičev Science on the East of the USSR under the paradigm of industrialisation 880-03 Novosibirsk NP Akad. Izdat. "Geo" INGG SO RAN 2012 346 pages graph. Darst. 21 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier PT: Science on the East of the USSR under the paradigm of industrialisation. - In kyrill. Schr., russ. - Zsfassung in engl. Sprache Includes bibliographical references Sozialgeschichte 1930-1970 gnd rswk-swf Research / Soviet Union / History Research / Russia (Federation) / Siberia / History Research fast Geschichte Industrialisierung (DE-588)4026776-3 gnd rswk-swf Wissenschaftspolitik (DE-588)4140181-5 gnd rswk-swf Wirtschaftswachstum (DE-588)4066527-6 gnd rswk-swf Russia (Federation) / Siberia fast Soviet Union fast Sowjetunion Sibirien (DE-588)4054780-2 gnd rswk-swf Sibirien (DE-588)4054780-2 g Wissenschaftspolitik (DE-588)4140181-5 s Industrialisierung (DE-588)4026776-3 s Wirtschaftswachstum (DE-588)4066527-6 s Sozialgeschichte 1930-1970 z DE-604 Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027447982&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027447982&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Abstract 100-01/(N Водичев, Е. Г ut 245-02/(N Наука на Востоке СССР в условиях индустриализационной парадигмы Е. Г. Водичев 264-03/(N Новосибирск ГЕО |
| spellingShingle | Vodičev, Evgenij Grigorʹevič Nauka na Vostoke SSSR v uslovijach industrializacionnoj paradigmy Research / Soviet Union / History Research / Russia (Federation) / Siberia / History Research fast Geschichte Industrialisierung (DE-588)4026776-3 gnd Wissenschaftspolitik (DE-588)4140181-5 gnd Wirtschaftswachstum (DE-588)4066527-6 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4026776-3 (DE-588)4140181-5 (DE-588)4066527-6 (DE-588)4054780-2 |
| title | Nauka na Vostoke SSSR v uslovijach industrializacionnoj paradigmy |
| title_alt | Science on the East of the USSR under the paradigm of industrialisation |
| title_auth | Nauka na Vostoke SSSR v uslovijach industrializacionnoj paradigmy |
| title_exact_search | Nauka na Vostoke SSSR v uslovijach industrializacionnoj paradigmy |
| title_full | Nauka na Vostoke SSSR v uslovijach industrializacionnoj paradigmy E. G. Vodičev |
| title_fullStr | Nauka na Vostoke SSSR v uslovijach industrializacionnoj paradigmy E. G. Vodičev |
| title_full_unstemmed | Nauka na Vostoke SSSR v uslovijach industrializacionnoj paradigmy E. G. Vodičev |
| title_short | Nauka na Vostoke SSSR v uslovijach industrializacionnoj paradigmy |
| title_sort | nauka na vostoke sssr v uslovijach industrializacionnoj paradigmy |
| topic | Research / Soviet Union / History Research / Russia (Federation) / Siberia / History Research fast Geschichte Industrialisierung (DE-588)4026776-3 gnd Wissenschaftspolitik (DE-588)4140181-5 gnd Wirtschaftswachstum (DE-588)4066527-6 gnd |
| topic_facet | Research / Soviet Union / History Research / Russia (Federation) / Siberia / History Research Geschichte Industrialisierung Wissenschaftspolitik Wirtschaftswachstum Russia (Federation) / Siberia Soviet Union Sowjetunion Sibirien |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027447982&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027447982&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT vodicevevgenijgrigorʹevic naukanavostokesssrvuslovijachindustrializacionnojparadigmy AT vodicevevgenijgrigorʹevic scienceontheeastoftheussrundertheparadigmofindustrialisation |