The right to health at the public/private divide: a global comparative study
"In 2006, a WHO survey found evidence of a substantial increase in patient-led litigation against health authorities and funders over access to medicines around the world. New Zealanders have seldom litigated denials of access to health care. Part of the explanation lies in the fact that New Ze...
Gespeichert in:
| Format: | Buch |
|---|---|
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
New York
Cambridge Univ. Press
2014
|
| Ausgabe: | 1. publ. |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Zusammenfassung: | "In 2006, a WHO survey found evidence of a substantial increase in patient-led litigation against health authorities and funders over access to medicines around the world. New Zealanders have seldom litigated denials of access to health care. Part of the explanation lies in the fact that New Zealand has a legislated patients' "bill of rights", with enforcement through a complaints mechanism. Although the separate regime does not afford patients substantive legal protection in respect of complaints about lack of access to care, this form of alternative, low-level resolution of health care disputes does condition disgruntled patients not to turn to the courts for legal redress in relation to their rights. But given the increasing need for prioritization arising from serious concern about the sustainability of the public health system, as well as a trend towards greater explicitness when it occurs, increased disappointment on behalf of patients and the public when care is denied or limited seems inevitable. This may well translate into increased patient-led litigation against health boards and funders. Part 1 provides an overview of the New Zealand health system, with a focus on the points at which resource allocation decisions are made, the identity of the decision-maker, and the methods by which priority-setting occurs. Part 1.1 describes inequalities between population groups in New Zealand, both in health outcomes and in access to health care. Part 2 describes the legal framework surrounding the health and disability sector, and discusses the lack of legislated rights to health and the limited right of access to health care in legislation, despite the existence of a legally enforceable Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers' Rights".. |
| Beschreibung: | Includes bibliographical references and index |
| Beschreibung: | XVII, 492 S. |
| ISBN: | 9781107038301 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV041978635 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20160318 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 140716s2014 xxu |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 010 | |a 013042458 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781107038301 |c hardback |9 978-1-107-03830-1 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)888161540 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV041978635 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a xxu |c US | ||
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-29 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a K3601 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 362.1 |2 23 | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The right to health at the public/private divide |b a global comparative study |c ed. by Colleen M. Flood, University of Toronto, Faculty of Law ; Aeyal Gross, Tel-Aviv University, Faculty of Law |
| 246 | 1 | 3 | |a The right to health at the public private divide |
| 250 | |a 1. publ. | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a New York |b Cambridge Univ. Press |c 2014 | |
| 300 | |a XVII, 492 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index | ||
| 520 | |a "In 2006, a WHO survey found evidence of a substantial increase in patient-led litigation against health authorities and funders over access to medicines around the world. New Zealanders have seldom litigated denials of access to health care. Part of the explanation lies in the fact that New Zealand has a legislated patients' "bill of rights", with enforcement through a complaints mechanism. Although the separate regime does not afford patients substantive legal protection in respect of complaints about lack of access to care, this form of alternative, low-level resolution of health care disputes does condition disgruntled patients not to turn to the courts for legal redress in relation to their rights. But given the increasing need for prioritization arising from serious concern about the sustainability of the public health system, as well as a trend towards greater explicitness when it occurs, increased disappointment on behalf of patients and the public when care is denied or limited seems inevitable. This may well translate into increased patient-led litigation against health boards and funders. Part 1 provides an overview of the New Zealand health system, with a focus on the points at which resource allocation decisions are made, the identity of the decision-maker, and the methods by which priority-setting occurs. Part 1.1 describes inequalities between population groups in New Zealand, both in health outcomes and in access to health care. Part 2 describes the legal framework surrounding the health and disability sector, and discusses the lack of legislated rights to health and the limited right of access to health care in legislation, despite the existence of a legally enforceable Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers' Rights".. | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW / Health |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Recht | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Medical care |x Law and legislation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Right to health | |
| 650 | 4 | |a LAW / Health | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Recht auf Gesundheit |0 (DE-588)4563836-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Internationaler Vergleich |0 (DE-588)4120509-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsstreit |0 (DE-588)4139832-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Gesundheitsrecht |0 (DE-588)4020766-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Australien |0 (DE-588)4003900-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4143413-4 |a Aufsatzsammlung |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Australien |0 (DE-588)4003900-6 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Recht auf Gesundheit |0 (DE-588)4563836-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Gesundheitsrecht |0 (DE-588)4020766-3 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Rechtsstreit |0 (DE-588)4139832-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 689 | 1 | 0 | |a Recht auf Gesundheit |0 (DE-588)4563836-6 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | 1 | |a Gesundheitsrecht |0 (DE-588)4020766-3 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | 2 | |a Internationaler Vergleich |0 (DE-588)4120509-1 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | |C b |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Flood, Colleen M. |d 1966- |e Sonstige |0 (DE-588)138513813 |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gros, Aeyal M. |d 1965- |e Sonstige |0 (DE-588)1072393387 |4 oth | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m SWB Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027421139&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027421139 | ||
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |f 090511 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 610.9 |e 22/bsb |f 090511 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804152378163724288 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | CONTENTS
CONTRIBUTORS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
INTRODUCTION:
MARRYING
HUMAN
RIGHTS
AND
HEALTH
CARE
SYSTEMS:
CONTEXTS
FORAPOWER
TO
IMPROVE
ACCESS
AND
EQUITY
COLLEEN
M.FLOOD
AND
AEYALGROSS
PART
I:
NATIONAL
PUBLIC
HEALTH
SYSTEMS
(TAX
FINANCED)
1.
LITIGATING
ARIGHT
TOHEALTH
CARE
INNEW
ZEALAND
JOANNA
MANNING
2.
THE
RIGHT
TO
HEALTH
IN
SWEDEN
ANNA-SARA
LIND
3.
LITIGATING
HEALTH
RIGHTS
INCANADA:
AWHITE
KNIGHT
FOR
EQUITY?
COLLEEN
M.FLOOD
4.
PROMOTING
ACCESS
AND
EQUITY
IN
HEALTH:
ASSESSING
THE
NATIONAL
HEALTH
SERVICE
INENGLAND
CHRISTOPHER
NEWDICK
PART
II:
SOCIAL
HEALTH
INSURANCE
SYSTEMS
5.
COLOMBIA S
RIGHT-TO-HEALTH
LITIGATION
INACONTEXT
OF
HEALTH
CARE
REFORM
EVERALDO
LAMPREA
V
PAGEIX
XVII
79
10
7
VI
CONTENTS
6.
THE
RIGHT
TO
HEALTH
INISRAEL
BETWEEN
SOLIDARITY
AND
NEOLIBERALISM
159
AEYALGROSS
7.
HEALTH
CARE
ACCESS
INTHE
NETHERLANDS:
ATRUE
STORY
188
ANDRE
DEN
EXTER
8.
ADDRESSING
EQUITY
INHEALTH
CARE
ATTHE
PUBLIC-PRIVATE
INTERSECTION:
THE
ROLE
OFHEALTH
RIGHTS
ENFORCEMENT
IN
HUNGARY
208
MARIA
EVAFOELDES
9.
LENDING
AHELPING
HAND:
THE
IMPACT
OFCONSTITUTIONAL
INTERPRETATION
ONTAIWAN S
NATIONAL
HEALTH
INSURANCE
PROGRAM,
HEALTH
EQUITY,
AND
DISTRIBUTIVE
JUSTICE
236
Y.Y.BRANDON
CHEN
PART
III:
MIXED
PRIVATE / PUBLIC
SYSTEMS
10.
HEALTH
RIGHTS
ATTHE
JUNCTURE
BETWEEN
STATE
AND
MARKET:
THE
PEOPLE S
REPUBLIC
OFCHINA
263
CHRISTINA
S.HO
11.
THE
ROLE
OFRIGHTS
AND
LITIGATION
INASSURING
MORE
EQUITABLE
ACCESSTOHEALTH
CARE
INSOUTH
AFRICA
288
LISAFORMAN
AND
JEROME
AMIR
SINGH
12.
PROVISION
OFHEALTH
CARE
SERVICES
AND
THE
RIGHT
TOHEALTH
IN
BRAZIL:
THE
LONG,
WINDING,
AND
UNCERTAIN
ROAD
TOEQUALITY
319
MARIANA
MOTA
PRADO
13,
AVISION
OFAN
EMERGING
RIGHT
TOHEALTH
CARE
INTHE
UNITED
STATES:
EXPANDING
HEALTH
CARE
EQUITY
THROUGH
LEGISLATIVE
REFORM
345
ALLISON
K.
HOFFMAN
14.
THE
LEGAL
PROTECTION
AND
ENFORCEMENT
OFHEALTH
RIGHTS
IN
NIGERIA
371
REMIGIUS
N.NWABUEZE
15.
LITIGATING
THE
RIGHT
TO
HEALTH
INVENEZUELA:
A
NONJUSTICIABLE
(?)
RIGHT
INTHE
CONTEXT
OFADEFICIENT
HEALTH
CARE
SYSTEM
394
OSCAR
A.
CABRERA
AND
FANNY
GOMEZ
CONTENTS
VII
16.
RIGHTTOHEALTH:ADDRESSING
INEQUITIES
THROUGH
LITIGATION
ININDIA
ANAND
GROVER,
MAITREYI
MISRA,AND
LUBHYATHI
RANGARAJAN
CONCLUSION:
CONTEXTS
FORTHEPROMISE
ANDPERIL
OFTHE
RIGHT
TOHEALTH
COLLEEN
M.FLOOD
AND
AEYALGROSS
LNDEX
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author_GND | (DE-588)138513813 (DE-588)1072393387 |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV041978635 |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | K3601 |
| callnumber-raw | K3601 |
| callnumber-search | K3601 |
| callnumber-sort | K 43601 |
| callnumber-subject | K - General Law |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)888161540 (DE-599)BVBBV041978635 |
| dewey-full | 362.1 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 362 - Social problems and services to groups |
| dewey-raw | 362.1 |
| dewey-search | 362.1 |
| dewey-sort | 3362.1 |
| dewey-tens | 360 - Social problems and services; associations |
| discipline | Soziologie |
| edition | 1. publ. |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04348nam a2200637 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV041978635</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20160318 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">140716s2014 xxu |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">013042458</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781107038301</subfield><subfield code="c">hardback</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-107-03830-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)888161540</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV041978635</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxu</subfield><subfield code="c">US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K3601</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">362.1</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The right to health at the public/private divide</subfield><subfield code="b">a global comparative study</subfield><subfield code="c">ed. by Colleen M. Flood, University of Toronto, Faculty of Law ; Aeyal Gross, Tel-Aviv University, Faculty of Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">The right to health at the public private divide</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1. publ.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">New York</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge Univ. Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XVII, 492 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"In 2006, a WHO survey found evidence of a substantial increase in patient-led litigation against health authorities and funders over access to medicines around the world. New Zealanders have seldom litigated denials of access to health care. Part of the explanation lies in the fact that New Zealand has a legislated patients' "bill of rights", with enforcement through a complaints mechanism. Although the separate regime does not afford patients substantive legal protection in respect of complaints about lack of access to care, this form of alternative, low-level resolution of health care disputes does condition disgruntled patients not to turn to the courts for legal redress in relation to their rights. But given the increasing need for prioritization arising from serious concern about the sustainability of the public health system, as well as a trend towards greater explicitness when it occurs, increased disappointment on behalf of patients and the public when care is denied or limited seems inevitable. This may well translate into increased patient-led litigation against health boards and funders. Part 1 provides an overview of the New Zealand health system, with a focus on the points at which resource allocation decisions are made, the identity of the decision-maker, and the methods by which priority-setting occurs. Part 1.1 describes inequalities between population groups in New Zealand, both in health outcomes and in access to health care. Part 2 describes the legal framework surrounding the health and disability sector, and discusses the lack of legislated rights to health and the limited right of access to health care in legislation, despite the existence of a legally enforceable Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers' Rights"..</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW / Health</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Recht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Medical care</subfield><subfield code="x">Law and legislation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Right to health</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">LAW / Health</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Recht auf Gesundheit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4563836-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Internationaler Vergleich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4120509-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsstreit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4139832-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gesundheitsrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4020766-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Australien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4003900-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4143413-4</subfield><subfield code="a">Aufsatzsammlung</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Australien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4003900-6</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Recht auf Gesundheit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4563836-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Gesundheitsrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4020766-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Rechtsstreit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4139832-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Recht auf Gesundheit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4563836-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Gesundheitsrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4020766-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Internationaler Vergleich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4120509-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="C">b</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Flood, Colleen M.</subfield><subfield code="d">1966-</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)138513813</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gros, Aeyal M.</subfield><subfield code="d">1965-</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1072393387</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">SWB Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027421139&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027421139</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090511</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">610.9</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090511</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)4143413-4 Aufsatzsammlung gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Aufsatzsammlung |
| geographic | Australien (DE-588)4003900-6 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Australien |
| id | DE-604.BV041978635 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T01:09:45Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781107038301 |
| language | English |
| lccn | 013042458 |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027421139 |
| oclc_num | 888161540 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-29 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-29 |
| physical | XVII, 492 S. |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publishDateSearch | 2014 |
| publishDateSort | 2014 |
| publisher | Cambridge Univ. Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | The right to health at the public/private divide a global comparative study ed. by Colleen M. Flood, University of Toronto, Faculty of Law ; Aeyal Gross, Tel-Aviv University, Faculty of Law The right to health at the public private divide 1. publ. New York Cambridge Univ. Press 2014 XVII, 492 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Includes bibliographical references and index "In 2006, a WHO survey found evidence of a substantial increase in patient-led litigation against health authorities and funders over access to medicines around the world. New Zealanders have seldom litigated denials of access to health care. Part of the explanation lies in the fact that New Zealand has a legislated patients' "bill of rights", with enforcement through a complaints mechanism. Although the separate regime does not afford patients substantive legal protection in respect of complaints about lack of access to care, this form of alternative, low-level resolution of health care disputes does condition disgruntled patients not to turn to the courts for legal redress in relation to their rights. But given the increasing need for prioritization arising from serious concern about the sustainability of the public health system, as well as a trend towards greater explicitness when it occurs, increased disappointment on behalf of patients and the public when care is denied or limited seems inevitable. This may well translate into increased patient-led litigation against health boards and funders. Part 1 provides an overview of the New Zealand health system, with a focus on the points at which resource allocation decisions are made, the identity of the decision-maker, and the methods by which priority-setting occurs. Part 1.1 describes inequalities between population groups in New Zealand, both in health outcomes and in access to health care. Part 2 describes the legal framework surrounding the health and disability sector, and discusses the lack of legislated rights to health and the limited right of access to health care in legislation, despite the existence of a legally enforceable Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers' Rights".. LAW / Health bisacsh Recht Medical care Law and legislation Right to health LAW / Health Recht auf Gesundheit (DE-588)4563836-6 gnd rswk-swf Internationaler Vergleich (DE-588)4120509-1 gnd rswk-swf Rechtsstreit (DE-588)4139832-4 gnd rswk-swf Gesundheitsrecht (DE-588)4020766-3 gnd rswk-swf Australien (DE-588)4003900-6 gnd rswk-swf (DE-588)4143413-4 Aufsatzsammlung gnd-content Australien (DE-588)4003900-6 g Recht auf Gesundheit (DE-588)4563836-6 s Gesundheitsrecht (DE-588)4020766-3 s Rechtsstreit (DE-588)4139832-4 s DE-604 Internationaler Vergleich (DE-588)4120509-1 s b DE-604 Flood, Colleen M. 1966- Sonstige (DE-588)138513813 oth Gros, Aeyal M. 1965- Sonstige (DE-588)1072393387 oth SWB Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027421139&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | The right to health at the public/private divide a global comparative study LAW / Health bisacsh Recht Medical care Law and legislation Right to health LAW / Health Recht auf Gesundheit (DE-588)4563836-6 gnd Internationaler Vergleich (DE-588)4120509-1 gnd Rechtsstreit (DE-588)4139832-4 gnd Gesundheitsrecht (DE-588)4020766-3 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4563836-6 (DE-588)4120509-1 (DE-588)4139832-4 (DE-588)4020766-3 (DE-588)4003900-6 (DE-588)4143413-4 |
| title | The right to health at the public/private divide a global comparative study |
| title_alt | The right to health at the public private divide |
| title_auth | The right to health at the public/private divide a global comparative study |
| title_exact_search | The right to health at the public/private divide a global comparative study |
| title_full | The right to health at the public/private divide a global comparative study ed. by Colleen M. Flood, University of Toronto, Faculty of Law ; Aeyal Gross, Tel-Aviv University, Faculty of Law |
| title_fullStr | The right to health at the public/private divide a global comparative study ed. by Colleen M. Flood, University of Toronto, Faculty of Law ; Aeyal Gross, Tel-Aviv University, Faculty of Law |
| title_full_unstemmed | The right to health at the public/private divide a global comparative study ed. by Colleen M. Flood, University of Toronto, Faculty of Law ; Aeyal Gross, Tel-Aviv University, Faculty of Law |
| title_short | The right to health at the public/private divide |
| title_sort | the right to health at the public private divide a global comparative study |
| title_sub | a global comparative study |
| topic | LAW / Health bisacsh Recht Medical care Law and legislation Right to health LAW / Health Recht auf Gesundheit (DE-588)4563836-6 gnd Internationaler Vergleich (DE-588)4120509-1 gnd Rechtsstreit (DE-588)4139832-4 gnd Gesundheitsrecht (DE-588)4020766-3 gnd |
| topic_facet | LAW / Health Recht Medical care Law and legislation Right to health Recht auf Gesundheit Internationaler Vergleich Rechtsstreit Gesundheitsrecht Australien Aufsatzsammlung |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027421139&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT floodcolleenm therighttohealthatthepublicprivatedivideaglobalcomparativestudy AT grosaeyalm therighttohealthatthepublicprivatedivideaglobalcomparativestudy AT floodcolleenm therighttohealthatthepublicprivatedivide AT grosaeyalm therighttohealthatthepublicprivatedivide |