Shah Bano: Muslim Women's Rights
Gespeichert in:
| Weitere Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch Nachschlagewerke |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cincinnati
University of Cincinnati, Laura Dudley Jenkins
2002-
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | kostenfrei |
| Veröffentlicht: | Nachgewiesen 2002 - |
| Beschreibung: | Gesehen am 09.05.14 |
| Beschreibung: | Online-Ressource |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmi a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV041838919 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20180411003556 | ||
| 006 | m|||| o||u| |||||| | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 140509c20029999gw || |s|||| 0 ||eng d | ||
| 016 | 7 | |a 105091516X |2 DE-101 | |
| 016 | 7 | |a 2769657-1 |2 DE-600 | |
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1366419473 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)ZDB2769657-1 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a gw |c XA-DE | ||
| 049 | |a DE-703 |a DE-1049 |a DE-898 |a DE-12 |a DE-92 |a DE-1028 |a DE-384 |a DE-210 |a DE-20 |a DE-91 |a DE-739 |a DE-473 |a DE-19 |a DE-355 |a DE-150 |a DE-706 | ||
| 084 | |a 300 |2 23sdnb | ||
| 084 | |a 6,24 |2 ssgn | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Shah Bano |b Muslim Women's Rights |c Laura Dudley Jenkins |
| 264 | 3 | 1 | |a Cincinnati |b University of Cincinnati, Laura Dudley Jenkins |c 2002- |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 362 | 0 | |a Nachgewiesen 2002 - | |
| 363 | 0 | 1 | |i 2002 |
| 500 | |a Gesehen am 09.05.14 | ||
| 505 | 8 | |a [Dt.:] Diese Webseite ist dem Shah Bano-Fall sowie seinen gesellschaftlichen und politischen Auswirkungen gewidmet. 1989 sprach der Oberste Gerichtshof Indiens einer muslimischen Frau nach der Scheidung Unterhalt zu, wobei dies gegen traditionelles muslimisches Recht verstieß. Die Regierung unter Rajiv Gandhi kippte durch eine Verfassungsänderung das Gerichtsurteil. In einem späteren Gesetz wurde festgeschrieben, dass muslimische Frauen nach der Scheidung keinen Anspruch auf Unterhalt haben. Insbesondere bei hinduistischen Organisationen stieß diese Sonderbehandlung des islamischen Rechts auf starke Proteste. Anhand vieler Hintergrundinformationen wird der Entscheidungsprozess und insbesondere das Dilemma der Regierung unter Rajiv Gandhi nachgezeichnet. - [Engl.:] In India, the "personal laws" of different religious communities continue to be legally recognized in marriage and divorce cases. Personal laws of all communities have been criticized for disadvantaging women. | |
| 505 | 8 | |a The Shah Bano decision, in which the Supreme Court overruled a Muslim personal law, granted a Muslim women alimony but threatened the limited legal autonomy granted to the Muslim minority in India. In response, legislation was proposed to prevent such a court decision in the future. Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi faced a rights dilemma. His decision over whether to support the Supreme Court ruling or the new legislation, like the larger debate over whether to retain these personal laws or adopt a uniform civil code, poses dilemmas and debates for students of politics, law, women s studies and human rights. | |
| 505 | 8 | |a Questions raised include: How should we weigh individual women's rights against the rights of a disadvantaged minority group? Can or should we have universal women's rights? Are human rights only the rights of individuals? Can we preserve both cultural traditions and individual rights? Is it possible to compromise when faced with such a rights dilemma? This case makes use of the web to include a variety of links to supplemental readings, often primary sources, and related websites. A suggested approach is to read through the entire case first, without these digressions. This will provide the level of detail necessary for the questions and general class discussion. As you reread the case, you are then encouraged to explore these supplements to enhance your understanding of the case and to help you with your essays or other assignments and activities | |
| 546 | |a Homepage engl. | ||
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Unterhaltspflicht |0 (DE-588)4078570-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Islam |0 (DE-588)4027743-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Indien |0 (DE-588)4026722-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4596172-4 |a Website |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Indien |0 (DE-588)4026722-2 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 689 | 1 | 0 | |a Islam |0 (DE-588)4027743-4 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | |5 DE-1991 |a DE-576 | |
| 689 | 2 | 0 | |a Unterhaltspflicht |0 (DE-588)4078570-1 |D s |
| 689 | 2 | |5 DE-1991 |a DE-576 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dudley Jenkins, Laura |0 (DE-588)1148588582 |4 ctb | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://homepages.uc.edu/thro/shahbano/index.htm |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027283635 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1813695071931858944 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | |
| any_adam_object | |
| author2 | Dudley Jenkins, Laura |
| author2_role | ctb |
| author2_variant | j l d jl jld |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1148588582 |
| author_facet | Dudley Jenkins, Laura |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV041838919 |
| contents | [Dt.:] Diese Webseite ist dem Shah Bano-Fall sowie seinen gesellschaftlichen und politischen Auswirkungen gewidmet. 1989 sprach der Oberste Gerichtshof Indiens einer muslimischen Frau nach der Scheidung Unterhalt zu, wobei dies gegen traditionelles muslimisches Recht verstieß. Die Regierung unter Rajiv Gandhi kippte durch eine Verfassungsänderung das Gerichtsurteil. In einem späteren Gesetz wurde festgeschrieben, dass muslimische Frauen nach der Scheidung keinen Anspruch auf Unterhalt haben. Insbesondere bei hinduistischen Organisationen stieß diese Sonderbehandlung des islamischen Rechts auf starke Proteste. Anhand vieler Hintergrundinformationen wird der Entscheidungsprozess und insbesondere das Dilemma der Regierung unter Rajiv Gandhi nachgezeichnet. - [Engl.:] In India, the "personal laws" of different religious communities continue to be legally recognized in marriage and divorce cases. Personal laws of all communities have been criticized for disadvantaging women. The Shah Bano decision, in which the Supreme Court overruled a Muslim personal law, granted a Muslim women alimony but threatened the limited legal autonomy granted to the Muslim minority in India. In response, legislation was proposed to prevent such a court decision in the future. Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi faced a rights dilemma. His decision over whether to support the Supreme Court ruling or the new legislation, like the larger debate over whether to retain these personal laws or adopt a uniform civil code, poses dilemmas and debates for students of politics, law, women s studies and human rights. Questions raised include: How should we weigh individual women's rights against the rights of a disadvantaged minority group? Can or should we have universal women's rights? Are human rights only the rights of individuals? Can we preserve both cultural traditions and individual rights? Is it possible to compromise when faced with such a rights dilemma? This case makes use of the web to include a variety of links to supplemental readings, often primary sources, and related websites. A suggested approach is to read through the entire case first, without these digressions. This will provide the level of detail necessary for the questions and general class discussion. As you reread the case, you are then encouraged to explore these supplements to enhance your understanding of the case and to help you with your essays or other assignments and activities |
| ctrlnum | 2769657-1 (OCoLC)1366419473 (DE-599)ZDB2769657-1 |
| dateSpan | Nachgewiesen 2002 - |
| format | Electronic Reference Material |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04211nmi a2200529 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV041838919</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20180411003556 </controlfield><controlfield tag="006">m|||| o||u| ||||||</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">140509c20029999gw || |s|||| 0 ||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="016" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">105091516X</subfield><subfield code="2">DE-101</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="016" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2769657-1</subfield><subfield code="2">DE-600</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1366419473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)ZDB2769657-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">gw</subfield><subfield code="c">XA-DE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1049</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-898</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-92</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1028</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-210</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-150</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-706</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">300</subfield><subfield code="2">23sdnb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">6,24</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Shah Bano</subfield><subfield code="b">Muslim Women's Rights</subfield><subfield code="c">Laura Dudley Jenkins</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1="3" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cincinnati</subfield><subfield code="b">University of Cincinnati, Laura Dudley Jenkins</subfield><subfield code="c">2002-</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ressource</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="362" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nachgewiesen 2002 -</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="363" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="i">2002</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gesehen am 09.05.14</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">[Dt.:] Diese Webseite ist dem Shah Bano-Fall sowie seinen gesellschaftlichen und politischen Auswirkungen gewidmet. 1989 sprach der Oberste Gerichtshof Indiens einer muslimischen Frau nach der Scheidung Unterhalt zu, wobei dies gegen traditionelles muslimisches Recht verstieß. Die Regierung unter Rajiv Gandhi kippte durch eine Verfassungsänderung das Gerichtsurteil. In einem späteren Gesetz wurde festgeschrieben, dass muslimische Frauen nach der Scheidung keinen Anspruch auf Unterhalt haben. Insbesondere bei hinduistischen Organisationen stieß diese Sonderbehandlung des islamischen Rechts auf starke Proteste. Anhand vieler Hintergrundinformationen wird der Entscheidungsprozess und insbesondere das Dilemma der Regierung unter Rajiv Gandhi nachgezeichnet. - [Engl.:] In India, the "personal laws" of different religious communities continue to be legally recognized in marriage and divorce cases. Personal laws of all communities have been criticized for disadvantaging women. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The Shah Bano decision, in which the Supreme Court overruled a Muslim personal law, granted a Muslim women alimony but threatened the limited legal autonomy granted to the Muslim minority in India. In response, legislation was proposed to prevent such a court decision in the future. Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi faced a rights dilemma. His decision over whether to support the Supreme Court ruling or the new legislation, like the larger debate over whether to retain these personal laws or adopt a uniform civil code, poses dilemmas and debates for students of politics, law, women s studies and human rights. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Questions raised include: How should we weigh individual women's rights against the rights of a disadvantaged minority group? Can or should we have universal women's rights? Are human rights only the rights of individuals? Can we preserve both cultural traditions and individual rights? Is it possible to compromise when faced with such a rights dilemma? This case makes use of the web to include a variety of links to supplemental readings, often primary sources, and related websites. A suggested approach is to read through the entire case first, without these digressions. This will provide the level of detail necessary for the questions and general class discussion. As you reread the case, you are then encouraged to explore these supplements to enhance your understanding of the case and to help you with your essays or other assignments and activities</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Homepage engl.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Unterhaltspflicht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078570-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Islam</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4027743-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Indien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4026722-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4596172-4</subfield><subfield code="a">Website</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Indien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4026722-2</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Islam</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4027743-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-1991</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-576</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Unterhaltspflicht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078570-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-1991</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-576</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dudley Jenkins, Laura</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1148588582</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://homepages.uc.edu/thro/shahbano/index.htm</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027283635</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)4596172-4 Website gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Website |
| geographic | Indien (DE-588)4026722-2 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Indien |
| id | DE-604.BV041838919 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-10-23T09:06:47Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027283635 |
| oclc_num | 1366419473 |
| open_access_boolean | 1 |
| owner | DE-703 DE-1049 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-12 DE-92 DE-1028 DE-384 DE-210 DE-20 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-739 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-150 DE-706 |
| owner_facet | DE-703 DE-1049 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-12 DE-92 DE-1028 DE-384 DE-210 DE-20 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-739 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-150 DE-706 |
| physical | Online-Ressource |
| publishDate | 2002 |
| publishDateSearch | 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 8888 |
| publishDateSort | 2024 |
| publisher | University of Cincinnati, Laura Dudley Jenkins |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Shah Bano Muslim Women's Rights Laura Dudley Jenkins Cincinnati University of Cincinnati, Laura Dudley Jenkins 2002- Online-Ressource txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Nachgewiesen 2002 - 2002 Gesehen am 09.05.14 [Dt.:] Diese Webseite ist dem Shah Bano-Fall sowie seinen gesellschaftlichen und politischen Auswirkungen gewidmet. 1989 sprach der Oberste Gerichtshof Indiens einer muslimischen Frau nach der Scheidung Unterhalt zu, wobei dies gegen traditionelles muslimisches Recht verstieß. Die Regierung unter Rajiv Gandhi kippte durch eine Verfassungsänderung das Gerichtsurteil. In einem späteren Gesetz wurde festgeschrieben, dass muslimische Frauen nach der Scheidung keinen Anspruch auf Unterhalt haben. Insbesondere bei hinduistischen Organisationen stieß diese Sonderbehandlung des islamischen Rechts auf starke Proteste. Anhand vieler Hintergrundinformationen wird der Entscheidungsprozess und insbesondere das Dilemma der Regierung unter Rajiv Gandhi nachgezeichnet. - [Engl.:] In India, the "personal laws" of different religious communities continue to be legally recognized in marriage and divorce cases. Personal laws of all communities have been criticized for disadvantaging women. The Shah Bano decision, in which the Supreme Court overruled a Muslim personal law, granted a Muslim women alimony but threatened the limited legal autonomy granted to the Muslim minority in India. In response, legislation was proposed to prevent such a court decision in the future. Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi faced a rights dilemma. His decision over whether to support the Supreme Court ruling or the new legislation, like the larger debate over whether to retain these personal laws or adopt a uniform civil code, poses dilemmas and debates for students of politics, law, women s studies and human rights. Questions raised include: How should we weigh individual women's rights against the rights of a disadvantaged minority group? Can or should we have universal women's rights? Are human rights only the rights of individuals? Can we preserve both cultural traditions and individual rights? Is it possible to compromise when faced with such a rights dilemma? This case makes use of the web to include a variety of links to supplemental readings, often primary sources, and related websites. A suggested approach is to read through the entire case first, without these digressions. This will provide the level of detail necessary for the questions and general class discussion. As you reread the case, you are then encouraged to explore these supplements to enhance your understanding of the case and to help you with your essays or other assignments and activities Homepage engl. Unterhaltspflicht (DE-588)4078570-1 gnd rswk-swf Islam (DE-588)4027743-4 gnd rswk-swf Indien (DE-588)4026722-2 gnd rswk-swf (DE-588)4596172-4 Website gnd-content Indien (DE-588)4026722-2 g DE-604 Islam (DE-588)4027743-4 s DE-1991 DE-576 Unterhaltspflicht (DE-588)4078570-1 s Dudley Jenkins, Laura (DE-588)1148588582 ctb http://homepages.uc.edu/thro/shahbano/index.htm Verlag kostenfrei Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Shah Bano Muslim Women's Rights [Dt.:] Diese Webseite ist dem Shah Bano-Fall sowie seinen gesellschaftlichen und politischen Auswirkungen gewidmet. 1989 sprach der Oberste Gerichtshof Indiens einer muslimischen Frau nach der Scheidung Unterhalt zu, wobei dies gegen traditionelles muslimisches Recht verstieß. Die Regierung unter Rajiv Gandhi kippte durch eine Verfassungsänderung das Gerichtsurteil. In einem späteren Gesetz wurde festgeschrieben, dass muslimische Frauen nach der Scheidung keinen Anspruch auf Unterhalt haben. Insbesondere bei hinduistischen Organisationen stieß diese Sonderbehandlung des islamischen Rechts auf starke Proteste. Anhand vieler Hintergrundinformationen wird der Entscheidungsprozess und insbesondere das Dilemma der Regierung unter Rajiv Gandhi nachgezeichnet. - [Engl.:] In India, the "personal laws" of different religious communities continue to be legally recognized in marriage and divorce cases. Personal laws of all communities have been criticized for disadvantaging women. The Shah Bano decision, in which the Supreme Court overruled a Muslim personal law, granted a Muslim women alimony but threatened the limited legal autonomy granted to the Muslim minority in India. In response, legislation was proposed to prevent such a court decision in the future. Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi faced a rights dilemma. His decision over whether to support the Supreme Court ruling or the new legislation, like the larger debate over whether to retain these personal laws or adopt a uniform civil code, poses dilemmas and debates for students of politics, law, women s studies and human rights. Questions raised include: How should we weigh individual women's rights against the rights of a disadvantaged minority group? Can or should we have universal women's rights? Are human rights only the rights of individuals? Can we preserve both cultural traditions and individual rights? Is it possible to compromise when faced with such a rights dilemma? This case makes use of the web to include a variety of links to supplemental readings, often primary sources, and related websites. A suggested approach is to read through the entire case first, without these digressions. This will provide the level of detail necessary for the questions and general class discussion. As you reread the case, you are then encouraged to explore these supplements to enhance your understanding of the case and to help you with your essays or other assignments and activities Unterhaltspflicht (DE-588)4078570-1 gnd Islam (DE-588)4027743-4 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4078570-1 (DE-588)4027743-4 (DE-588)4026722-2 (DE-588)4596172-4 |
| title | Shah Bano Muslim Women's Rights |
| title_auth | Shah Bano Muslim Women's Rights |
| title_exact_search | Shah Bano Muslim Women's Rights |
| title_full | Shah Bano Muslim Women's Rights Laura Dudley Jenkins |
| title_fullStr | Shah Bano Muslim Women's Rights Laura Dudley Jenkins |
| title_full_unstemmed | Shah Bano Muslim Women's Rights Laura Dudley Jenkins |
| title_short | Shah Bano |
| title_sort | shah bano muslim women s rights |
| title_sub | Muslim Women's Rights |
| topic | Unterhaltspflicht (DE-588)4078570-1 gnd Islam (DE-588)4027743-4 gnd |
| topic_facet | Unterhaltspflicht Islam Indien Website |
| url | http://homepages.uc.edu/thro/shahbano/index.htm |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT dudleyjenkinslaura shahbanomuslimwomensrights |
| zdb_num | 2769657-1 (DE-599)ZDB2769657-1 |