NATO missile defense and the European phased adaptive approach: the implications of burden sharing and the underappreciated role of the U.S. Army
In 2010, NATO decided to expand its ballistic missile defense program, in part because of the American offer to include its European Phased Adaptive Approach (EPAA) as the centerpiece of an expanded effort. For the Allies' part, few have actually contributed tangible ballistic missile defense a...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Carlisle, PA
U.S. Army War College
2013
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Zusammenfassung: | In 2010, NATO decided to expand its ballistic missile defense program, in part because of the American offer to include its European Phased Adaptive Approach (EPAA) as the centerpiece of an expanded effort. For the Allies' part, few have actually contributed tangible ballistic missile defense assets, in terms of missile interceptors, radars or other sensors, or ballistic missile defense-related platforms. This is likely to have significant implications for the U.S. Army, which has an important but largely underappreciated role in NATO missile defense today. In particular, the Army is likely to face increased manpower demands, materiel requirements, and training needs in order to meet the demand signal created by the NATO ballistic missile defense program. Additionally, Army units involved directly in or in support of ballistic missile defense are likely to face a higher OPTEMPO than currently projected. Ultimately, this will exacerbate the perceived imbalance in transatlantic burden-sharing, particularly if the EPAA provides little, if any, benefit to the defense of U.S. territory, given Washington's decision to cancel Phase 4 of that framework |
Beschreibung: | "October 2013.". - Includes bibliographical references |
Beschreibung: | XII, 53 S. Ill., graph. Darst. |
ISBN: | 1584875909 9781584875901 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV041642197 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20140306 | ||
007 | t| | ||
008 | 140211s2013 xxuad|| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
010 | |a 013455853 | ||
020 | |a 1584875909 |9 1-58487-590-9 | ||
020 | |a 9781584875901 |c pbk. |9 978-1-58487-590-1 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)873473373 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV041642197 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
044 | |a xxu |c US | ||
049 | |a DE-12 | ||
050 | 0 | |a UG745.E85 | |
084 | |a 8 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Whitmore, Steven J. |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1047353156 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a NATO missile defense and the European phased adaptive approach |b the implications of burden sharing and the underappreciated role of the U.S. Army |c Steven J. Whitmore, John R. Deni |
246 | 1 | 3 | |a North Atlantic Treaty Organization missile defense and the European phased adaptive approach |
264 | 1 | |a Carlisle, PA |b U.S. Army War College |c 2013 | |
300 | |a XII, 53 S. |b Ill., graph. Darst. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a "October 2013.". - Includes bibliographical references | ||
520 | |a In 2010, NATO decided to expand its ballistic missile defense program, in part because of the American offer to include its European Phased Adaptive Approach (EPAA) as the centerpiece of an expanded effort. For the Allies' part, few have actually contributed tangible ballistic missile defense assets, in terms of missile interceptors, radars or other sensors, or ballistic missile defense-related platforms. This is likely to have significant implications for the U.S. Army, which has an important but largely underappreciated role in NATO missile defense today. In particular, the Army is likely to face increased manpower demands, materiel requirements, and training needs in order to meet the demand signal created by the NATO ballistic missile defense program. Additionally, Army units involved directly in or in support of ballistic missile defense are likely to face a higher OPTEMPO than currently projected. Ultimately, this will exacerbate the perceived imbalance in transatlantic burden-sharing, particularly if the EPAA provides little, if any, benefit to the defense of U.S. territory, given Washington's decision to cancel Phase 4 of that framework | ||
610 | 1 | 4 | |a NATO |
610 | 2 | 4 | |a North Atlantic Treaty Organization |
610 | 2 | 4 | |a United States. |b Army, Europe |
610 | 2 | 7 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
610 | 2 | 7 | |a NATO |0 (DE-588)377-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 4 | |a Ballistic missile defenses |z Europe | |
650 | 4 | |a Security, International |z Europe | |
650 | 4 | |a National security |x International cooperation | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Raketenabwehr |0 (DE-588)4319388-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
651 | 4 | |a Europa | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a NATO |0 (DE-588)377-3 |D b |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |D b |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Raketenabwehr |0 (DE-588)4319388-2 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
700 | 1 | |a Deni, John R. |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1153930749 |4 aut | |
710 | 2 | |a Strategic Studies Institute (Carlisle Barracks, Pa.) |e Sonstige |0 (DE-588)1046371-9 |4 oth | |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m LoC Fremddatenuebernahme |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027082970&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
942 | 1 | 1 | |c 355.009 |e 22/bsb |f 090512 |g 181 |
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027082970 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1816337271393091584 |
---|---|
adam_text |
NATO MISSILE DEFENSE AND THE EUROPEAN PHASED ADAPTIVE APPROACH
/ WHITMORE, STEVEN J. [AUTHOR.]
: 2013
TABLE OF CONTENTS / INHALTSVERZEICHNIS
NATO'S DECISION TO EXPAND MISSILE DEFENSE
EUROPEAN PUBLIC OPINION
DEFENSE BUDGET CHALLENGES
THE TECHNICAL CHALLENGES OF BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE
SO WHY DID THE ALLIES AGREE?
ALLIED CONTRIBUTIONS TO DATE
THE ARMY'S ROLE IN NATO BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE
IMPLICATIONS FOR THE ARMY AND THE U.S. MILITARY
DIESES SCHRIFTSTUECK WURDE MASCHINELL ERZEUGT. |
any_adam_object | 1 |
author | Whitmore, Steven J. Deni, John R. |
author_GND | (DE-588)1047353156 (DE-588)1153930749 |
author_facet | Whitmore, Steven J. Deni, John R. |
author_role | aut aut |
author_sort | Whitmore, Steven J. |
author_variant | s j w sj sjw j r d jr jrd |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV041642197 |
callnumber-first | U - Military Science |
callnumber-label | UG745 |
callnumber-raw | UG745.E85 |
callnumber-search | UG745.E85 |
callnumber-sort | UG 3745 E85 |
callnumber-subject | UG - Military Engineering and Air Forces |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)873473373 (DE-599)BVBBV041642197 |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV041642197</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20140306</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">140211s2013 xxuad|| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">013455853</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1584875909</subfield><subfield code="9">1-58487-590-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781584875901</subfield><subfield code="c">pbk.</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-58487-590-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)873473373</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV041642197</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxu</subfield><subfield code="c">US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">UG745.E85</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">8</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Whitmore, Steven J.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1047353156</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">NATO missile defense and the European phased adaptive approach</subfield><subfield code="b">the implications of burden sharing and the underappreciated role of the U.S. Army</subfield><subfield code="c">Steven J. Whitmore, John R. Deni</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">North Atlantic Treaty Organization missile defense and the European phased adaptive approach</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Carlisle, PA</subfield><subfield code="b">U.S. Army War College</subfield><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XII, 53 S.</subfield><subfield code="b">Ill., graph. Darst.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"October 2013.". - Includes bibliographical references</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In 2010, NATO decided to expand its ballistic missile defense program, in part because of the American offer to include its European Phased Adaptive Approach (EPAA) as the centerpiece of an expanded effort. For the Allies' part, few have actually contributed tangible ballistic missile defense assets, in terms of missile interceptors, radars or other sensors, or ballistic missile defense-related platforms. This is likely to have significant implications for the U.S. Army, which has an important but largely underappreciated role in NATO missile defense today. In particular, the Army is likely to face increased manpower demands, materiel requirements, and training needs in order to meet the demand signal created by the NATO ballistic missile defense program. Additionally, Army units involved directly in or in support of ballistic missile defense are likely to face a higher OPTEMPO than currently projected. Ultimately, this will exacerbate the perceived imbalance in transatlantic burden-sharing, particularly if the EPAA provides little, if any, benefit to the defense of U.S. territory, given Washington's decision to cancel Phase 4 of that framework</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">NATO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">North Atlantic Treaty Organization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States.</subfield><subfield code="b">Army, Europe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">NATO</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)377-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ballistic missile defenses</subfield><subfield code="z">Europe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Security, International</subfield><subfield code="z">Europe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">National security</subfield><subfield code="x">International cooperation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Raketenabwehr</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4319388-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Europa</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">NATO</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)377-3</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Raketenabwehr</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4319388-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Deni, John R.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1153930749</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Strategic Studies Institute (Carlisle Barracks, Pa.)</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1046371-9</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">LoC Fremddatenuebernahme</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027082970&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">355.009</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090512</subfield><subfield code="g">181</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027082970</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | Europa |
geographic_facet | Europa |
id | DE-604.BV041642197 |
illustrated | Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-11-21T13:03:25Z |
institution | BVB |
institution_GND | (DE-588)1046371-9 |
isbn | 1584875909 9781584875901 |
language | English |
lccn | 013455853 |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-027082970 |
oclc_num | 873473373 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 |
owner_facet | DE-12 |
physical | XII, 53 S. Ill., graph. Darst. |
publishDate | 2013 |
publishDateSearch | 2013 |
publishDateSort | 2013 |
publisher | U.S. Army War College |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Whitmore, Steven J. Verfasser (DE-588)1047353156 aut NATO missile defense and the European phased adaptive approach the implications of burden sharing and the underappreciated role of the U.S. Army Steven J. Whitmore, John R. Deni North Atlantic Treaty Organization missile defense and the European phased adaptive approach Carlisle, PA U.S. Army War College 2013 XII, 53 S. Ill., graph. Darst. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier "October 2013.". - Includes bibliographical references In 2010, NATO decided to expand its ballistic missile defense program, in part because of the American offer to include its European Phased Adaptive Approach (EPAA) as the centerpiece of an expanded effort. For the Allies' part, few have actually contributed tangible ballistic missile defense assets, in terms of missile interceptors, radars or other sensors, or ballistic missile defense-related platforms. This is likely to have significant implications for the U.S. Army, which has an important but largely underappreciated role in NATO missile defense today. In particular, the Army is likely to face increased manpower demands, materiel requirements, and training needs in order to meet the demand signal created by the NATO ballistic missile defense program. Additionally, Army units involved directly in or in support of ballistic missile defense are likely to face a higher OPTEMPO than currently projected. Ultimately, this will exacerbate the perceived imbalance in transatlantic burden-sharing, particularly if the EPAA provides little, if any, benefit to the defense of U.S. territory, given Washington's decision to cancel Phase 4 of that framework NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization United States. Army, Europe Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd rswk-swf NATO (DE-588)377-3 gnd rswk-swf Ballistic missile defenses Europe Security, International Europe National security International cooperation Raketenabwehr (DE-588)4319388-2 gnd rswk-swf Europa NATO (DE-588)377-3 b Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 b Raketenabwehr (DE-588)4319388-2 s DE-604 Deni, John R. Verfasser (DE-588)1153930749 aut Strategic Studies Institute (Carlisle Barracks, Pa.) Sonstige (DE-588)1046371-9 oth LoC Fremddatenuebernahme application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027082970&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
spellingShingle | Whitmore, Steven J. Deni, John R. NATO missile defense and the European phased adaptive approach the implications of burden sharing and the underappreciated role of the U.S. Army NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization United States. Army, Europe Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd NATO (DE-588)377-3 gnd Ballistic missile defenses Europe Security, International Europe National security International cooperation Raketenabwehr (DE-588)4319388-2 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)5098525-5 (DE-588)377-3 (DE-588)4319388-2 |
title | NATO missile defense and the European phased adaptive approach the implications of burden sharing and the underappreciated role of the U.S. Army |
title_alt | North Atlantic Treaty Organization missile defense and the European phased adaptive approach |
title_auth | NATO missile defense and the European phased adaptive approach the implications of burden sharing and the underappreciated role of the U.S. Army |
title_exact_search | NATO missile defense and the European phased adaptive approach the implications of burden sharing and the underappreciated role of the U.S. Army |
title_full | NATO missile defense and the European phased adaptive approach the implications of burden sharing and the underappreciated role of the U.S. Army Steven J. Whitmore, John R. Deni |
title_fullStr | NATO missile defense and the European phased adaptive approach the implications of burden sharing and the underappreciated role of the U.S. Army Steven J. Whitmore, John R. Deni |
title_full_unstemmed | NATO missile defense and the European phased adaptive approach the implications of burden sharing and the underappreciated role of the U.S. Army Steven J. Whitmore, John R. Deni |
title_short | NATO missile defense and the European phased adaptive approach |
title_sort | nato missile defense and the european phased adaptive approach the implications of burden sharing and the underappreciated role of the u s army |
title_sub | the implications of burden sharing and the underappreciated role of the U.S. Army |
topic | NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization United States. Army, Europe Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd NATO (DE-588)377-3 gnd Ballistic missile defenses Europe Security, International Europe National security International cooperation Raketenabwehr (DE-588)4319388-2 gnd |
topic_facet | NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization United States. Army, Europe Europäische Union Ballistic missile defenses Europe Security, International Europe National security International cooperation Raketenabwehr Europa |
url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=027082970&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
work_keys_str_mv | AT whitmorestevenj natomissiledefenseandtheeuropeanphasedadaptiveapproachtheimplicationsofburdensharingandtheunderappreciatedroleoftheusarmy AT denijohnr natomissiledefenseandtheeuropeanphasedadaptiveapproachtheimplicationsofburdensharingandtheunderappreciatedroleoftheusarmy AT strategicstudiesinstitutecarlislebarrackspa natomissiledefenseandtheeuropeanphasedadaptiveapproachtheimplicationsofburdensharingandtheunderappreciatedroleoftheusarmy AT whitmorestevenj northatlantictreatyorganizationmissiledefenseandtheeuropeanphasedadaptiveapproach AT denijohnr northatlantictreatyorganizationmissiledefenseandtheeuropeanphasedadaptiveapproach AT strategicstudiesinstitutecarlislebarrackspa northatlantictreatyorganizationmissiledefenseandtheeuropeanphasedadaptiveapproach |