A garamszentbenedeki apátság története az Árpád- és az Anjou-korban: 1075 - 1403
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | Hungarian |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Szeged
Szegedi Tudományegyetem Történeti Intézete
2012
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Capitulum
8 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Abstract |
| Beschreibung: | Literaturverz. S. 217-223. - Zsfassung in engl. u. slowak. Sprache |
| Beschreibung: | 270 S., [1] gef. Bl. Ill. 24 cm |
| ISBN: | 9789633061817 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV041413652 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20150716 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 131113s2012 a||| |||| 00||| hun d | ||
| 020 | |a 9789633061817 |c hibás |9 978-963-306-181-7 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)864592319 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBV755704088 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a hun | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a 7,41 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Keglevich, Kristóf |d 1982- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1044050845 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a A garamszentbenedeki apátság története az Árpád- és az Anjou-korban |b 1075 - 1403 |c Keglevich Kristóf |
| 264 | 1 | |a Szeged |b Szegedi Tudományegyetem Történeti Intézete |c 2012 | |
| 300 | |a 270 S., [1] gef. Bl. |b Ill. |c 24 cm | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Capitulum |v 8 | |
| 500 | |a Literaturverz. S. 217-223. - Zsfassung in engl. u. slowak. Sprache | ||
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Kloster Hronský Beňadik |0 (DE-588)7538370-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Benediktiner |0 (DE-588)25880-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 648 | 7 | |a Geschichte 1075-1405 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Hronský Beňadik |0 (DE-588)4025955-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Kloster Hronský Beňadik |0 (DE-588)7538370-6 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Hronský Beňadik |0 (DE-588)4025955-9 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Benediktiner |0 (DE-588)25880-5 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Geschichte 1075-1405 |A z |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 830 | 0 | |a Capitulum |v 8 |w (DE-604)BV022230512 |9 8 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=026860936&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=026860936&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Abstract |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 909 |e 22/bsb |f 09021 |g 4373 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 200.9 |e 22/bsb |f 09021 |g 4373 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 200.9 |e 22/bsb |f 09021 |g 439 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 909 |e 22/bsb |f 09021 |g 439 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1805079399251312640 |
|---|---|
| adam_text |
TARTALOMJEGYZÉK
Előszó
7
Ì
.
A garamszentbenedeki alapítólevél historiográfiája
13
2.
Az alapítás
31
3.
Garamszentbenedek, a bencés rendház
37
3.1.
Bencések a
11.
századi Magyarországon
Ъ1
3.2.
Bencés monostorok a
12—13.
századi Magyarországon
39
3.3.
Az Anjou-kor és a Szigfrid apát vezette
14.
századi bencés
reformmozgalom
42
3.4.
Bencés élet Garamszentbenedeken
51
3.5.
A garamszentbenedeki apát pápai és királyi megbízatásai
55
4.
A monostor kiváltságainak és birtokállományának gyarapodása
59
4.1.
Egyházi kiváltságok
59
4.2.
Világi privilégiumok
62
4.3.
A monostornak adományozott birtoktestek
65
4.4.
Birtoktestek vásárlása
70
5.
A monostor peres ügyei
73
5./.
Az apátság perei saját népeivel
73
5.2.
Perek
Bars
vár ispánjával, jobbágyaival, illetve
Bars
polgáraival
74
5.3.
Perek az esztergomi érsekséggel
80
5.4.
Perek a nyitrai püspökkel
86
5.5.
Csák Máté tartományurasága
87
5.6.
Újbánya ellen folytatott perek
88
5.7.
Perek a budai, a nagy
tapóles
any
і
és az esztergomi polgárokkal
90
5.8.
Kovácsiért és Rohozsnicáért a Nemcsényiekkel szemben
91
5.9.
Perek egyéb barsi birtokokért
94
5.10.
A tiszai birtokok
99
5.11.
Várnagyok hatalmaskodás
ai az
apátság birtokain
102
5.12.
A perekből levonható tanulságok
105
6.
Gazdaság és birtokigazgatás a
11-14.
században
111
6.1.
A tized
111
6.2.
A monostor szolgálónépei a
11-13.
században
115
6.
3.
Szőlő, kereskedelem
119
6.4.
Vámok
120
6.5.
Birtokok bérbeadása
123
6.6.
Hordalékmosó és érczúzó malmok bérbeadása
127
6.7.
Birtokigazgatás
129
7.
A garamszentbenedeki apátság hiteleshelyi
tevékenysége
(1232-1403) 131
7.1.
Bevezetés
131
7.2.
Bevallások, átírások és tezaurálás
135
7.3.
Jelen
t
és
ек
137
7.4.
A hiteleshely területi illetékessége
142
7.5.
Az oklevelek külső ismertetőjegyei
149
7.6.
^4z oklevelek belső szerkezete
152
7.7.
Megfontolások
155
7.5.
A hiteleshelyi oklevelek sorsa
158
8.
Összefoglalás
159
Függelék
167
I.
A garamszentbenedeki apátság
1403
előtti személyi állománya
(Personalia)
169
II.
A garamszentbenedeki apátság birtokai és jogigényei
a
11-14.
században
175
III.
Oklevelek
203
Források és irodalom
217
Hely- és névmutató
225
Resume
247
Abstract
255
Képmelléklet
263
Abstract
Kristóf Keglevich
:
THE HISTORY OF THE ABBEY OF
GARAMSZENTBENEDEK
IN THE AGE OF THE
ÁRPÁD
AND
ANJOU
DYNASTIES
(Abstract)
The thesis deals with the history of the Benedictine monastery of Garamszent-
benedek (Saint Benedict at the river
Garam,
today
Hronský Beňadik)
during the
age of the
Árpád
and
Anjou
dynasties, treating the first one and a half decades of
the reign of King
Sigismund,
too. The Benedictine abbey of
Garamszentbenedek
was founded by King
Géza
I in
1075.
He probably began building it in the
1
060s
as a prince. The deed of foundation of the monastery was left to us in an inter¬
polated form. Researching the deed of foundation is the only field in the past of
the monastery where the historical scholarship of the 20th century has produced
new results. On the basis of the essays of
László Fejérpataky,
Richard
Marsina,
József
Laszlovszky and
György Györfíy
we can already see that most part of
the present text of the document of
1075
derives from the original document,
whose content was repetadly changed because of lawsuits in order to make it a
more effective tool of argument in legal disputes, first in the 1220s and 1230s,
then for the second time around
1276/1277
or in the 1320s. In spite of this the
interpolated parts (boundary descriptions) reflect conditions of the 11th century.
The monastery of
Garamszentbenedek
was regarded as illustrious even
among the monasteries belonging to the patronage of the king. It received new
land donations and legal privileges until the end of the age of the
Árpád
dynasty,
even during the age of the
Anjou
dynasty. The monarch's protection was really
important in the estate lawsuits and other lawsuits of the abbey. The statement of
Verner,
bailiff (comes) of Bars in
1246
is characteristic. He made no secret of the
fact that he had no choice but to hand over two properties in Bars to the monas¬
tery: "either we want it or not, we have to obey the king's order". The connec¬
tion between the medieval monasteries and their patrons (the king's patronage
protection being actually returned by the monks' prayers for him) is even more
beautifully illustrated by the application of
Garamszentbenedek
written to King
Louis the Great around
1350,
during the lawsuit against the citizens of
Újbánya:
"since we have no other refuge besides God but You, may Your excellency see
to it that we can get rid of such hindrances of our prosperity in order to be able
to worship God more undisturbed and more devoutly for Your and Your rela¬
tions' salvation." Stephen V stayed in
Garamszentbenedek
in
1272,
he dated his
document from there. Abbots Ladislas and
Sigfrid,
who lived in the first half of
the 14th century, are known to have had good connections at court, both of them
255
Abstract
were given the title of assistant minister of the king (capellanus noster).
Sigfrid
visited Edward HI of England as Louis the Great's delegate in
1346.
The monastery was also supported by the Apostolic Holy See. On the
basis of Pope Innocent Ill's patronage letter it can be considered as an exemptus
church. Its abbot was allowed to wear prelate's clothes in the same year. Szent-
benedek was granted permission to use liturgy under interdiction. The popes
made lists of the possessions of the monastery several times
(1209),
protected it
in their bulls
(1316, 1328, 1332, 1364),
even against the archbishop of
Eszter¬
gom
(1221, 1235).
There was one exception: Gregory XI enforced the archdio¬
cese's standpoint (despite King Louis the Great's support) against the monastery
in the action for possession that had been going on for a century between the
two church institutions. Curiously enough, the abbot of
Garamszentbenedek
was
rarely charged with papal missions
(1327, 1328, 1348).
In the 13th century the monastery successfully enforced its interests
against its own villeins, the bailiffs of Bars and
Zólyom
and the neighbouring
landowners successfully, only the power of the archbishop of
Esztergom
proved
to be invincible in the more important cases. In less significant cases it hap¬
pened that the archbishop yielded, for example in a tithe lawsuit in
1314.
The
lawsuit against the bishop of Nyitra ended in mutual renunciation. In the first
half of the age of the
Anjou
dynasty the castellans of Bars and Nyitra counties
(Léva, Saskő,
Revistye,
Hrussó,
Gimes)
having often worked on their own ac¬
count, emerged as new opponents. They were a nuisance to the monastery with
their despotic measures rather than seizing estates. In the middle of the 14th
century the monastery also got into trouble with the citizens of the neighbouring
towns (Bars,
Csütörtökhely, Nagytapolcsány, Buda, Óbuda, Esztergom).
It had
the most conflicts while
Sigfrid
was the abbot
—
on the one hand beacause of
Sigfrid's personality, on the other hand because the economic significance of the
towns had suddenly increased
(Újbánya
came into existence in the 1340s). The
monastery needed time to learn how to live together with the towns.
Sigfrid
after
having felt the (future) importance of the towns supported by the
Anjou
kings,
made efforts to gain a firm foothold in these ambitious settlements. He leased
out some of the land to the citizens and bought property in
Újbánya.
The number
of lawsuits in connection with despotic measures, leasing land and ownership
of land was highest in Sigfrid's time; the monastery won most of them but there
were several cases that it lost. For example in
1335
its accusation against the
bailiff of Bars didn't prove true, around
1339
it lost its case against the noblemen
of
Győröd,
in
1342
it was found guilty of unjust litigation by the palatine and in
1353
it had to pay penalty to Gregory from
Kistapolcsány.
The monastery took
part in its lawsuits mostly as a complainant (actor) and the king's patronage had
256
_
Abstract
a
significant
hand in the successes (see the practice of the annual letters of com¬
mand). Besides
Sigfrid
I, who vigorously fought for restoring the appropriated
goods of his monastery from the first year of his job,
Sigfrid
IPs personality must
be highlighted. In contrast with his predecessors and successors, he or rather his
deputy was taken to court over being despotic, which indicates that he protected
his interests without caring about the means. The vast majority of the cases of the
monastery were heard in royal courts.
The monastery of
Garamszentbenedek
took the lead in the reform move¬
ment of the Benedictine order due to its positions considered strong even nation¬
ally in the middle of the 14th century and abbot
Sigfrid
's
efficient activity. From
among the aims drawn up in Pope Benedict XJI's bull of
1336
(Summi
magistri)
keeping the province chapters and restoring certain appropriated Benedictine
goods were successfully carried through. Besides
Sigfrid
his predecessor abbot
Ladislas and a monk of
Szentbenedek,
Nicholas
Broda,
who previously worked
in
Dombó
and Kolozsmonostor, are to be mentioned because they demonstrably
fought against softening the ideals of the order.
Garamszentbenedek
founded
the priory of
Stola in
the county of Szepes in
1314.
There is no proof of the
relationship of the two convents.
Sigfrid
acquired the Basilian monastery of
Szávaszentdemeter
for the Benedictines in
1344,
in all probability its first new
convent partly came from
Garamszentbenedek,
too. It is an interesting additional
fact about the relationship of the Benedictine monasteries with each other in the
Hungarian Uplands, that in
1393
the abbot of
Szentbenedek
was represented at a
compromise in a lawsuit by the abbot of Zobor.
Little data is available about the internal life of the monastery. Garam-
szentbenedek was counted as a model monastery, since there is no information
of any abuses committed there. There was some temporary confusion only at the
end of the 1350s, when
Sigfrid
II, elected in
1355
and also confirmed by Pope
Innocent VI, couldn't take over his seat as an abbot, because until
1358
Ulric of
Gersten,
then between
1358
and
1359
Nicholas was the head of the monastery.
Until the end of the Middle Ages monastic life was led in
Garamszentbenedek,
regents (commendator) are only mentioned in the
1
6th century.
Apart from the names of abbots and priors the names of authentication
delegates and monk lawsuit representatives remained. In
1292
the dean, the guard
monk and the (monk) porter are mentioned, in
1338
the singer monk. The first
authentication document of the monastery was dated by master James, its superb
title may refer to the fact that as a monk he led the monastery school. It is known
from the document of
1292
that special cooks cooked for the monks. The codex
Nyitrai (so-called evangelistarium
Szelepcsényi)
from the 11th century and the
mass-book completed by Ladislas
Miskolci
in
1394
and presently kept in
Eger
257
Abstract
can questionably be linked to the monastery of
Szentbenedek.
Abbot
Sigfrid
I
started to build the present church of the monastery, the keystones of the vault¬
ing with carved
Anjou
coat of arms date the building before
1382
(maybe
1387).
Some of the noble servants
(familiáris)
of the abbey are known as func¬
tionaries for managing the estate, others are known because of their legal activ¬
ity. They must have been members of the lower nobility in the neightbourhood.
Ipoly's son
Mikó
worked as the "professional" lawyer of the monastery, he ap¬
pears in several lawsuits.
The monastery gained control of the net of estates scattered on the terri¬
tory of the country already at the time of its foundation according to its founding
and donation deed which remained to us in interpolated form. The core estates
were in the territory of Bars, but the monastery owned properties in counties
neighbouring Bars, as well as in the counties of
Csongrád
and Bihar. The abbey
got control of further smaller parts of properties as a beneficiary of wills after¬
wards. There are examples of donations of individuals from the 12th century
until the end of the
1
5th century, see Adrian's son Stephen's will leaving
Barátka
to the monastery, dated at the end of the
11
50s, known from the document of
Euzidinus. There is data of buying estate only from
1270
(a mill), from
1347
(a place for a mill) and from
1354
(a mill and a house in
Újbánya).
There is no
data about selling land, in accordance with the legal notion of the Middle Ages
that since the real owner of the properties of a church institution is the patron
saint of the institution, they are inalienable, therefore adjusting the estate was not
possible. The basis of the income was the tithe coming in from the properities
of the abbey, which belonged to the Benedictines already from
1075.
This was
not disputed until the 1410s, there is only data of three lawsuits of tithe (around
1270, 1312, 1314)
against the archbishop of
Esztergom,
which ended in success
for the monastery. The tithe was completed by service by the people living on
the properties, by customs and by income coming in from leasing certain pieces
of property. The most significant customs duties were situated along the trade
routes near the
Garam,
and leading to
Körmöcbánya
and
Zólyom.
The charges
coming from leasing
—
according to national tendencies
- -
appeared in docu¬
ments in the second half of the 13th century and became more and more frequent
from the 1330s. From the middle of the 14th century there are several signs
that the monastery managed leasing systematickly: the same piece of land was
leased out repeatedly, but the boundaries were changed flexibly, the price can be
considered roughly constant. There were several crushing and smelting ore-mills
among the leased properties. Several leases ended in court. The Benedictines of
Garamszentbenedek
ran butcher shops in
Körmöcbánya
from
1394,
so they took
258
_
Abstract
part in the economic life of the town as the owners of an enterprise in food indus¬
try. They also had interests in Bars and
Újbánya
(mills, pieces of land).
The monastery was not involved in real authentication place activities
until the beginning of the 14th century, only two authentic documents remained
from the age of the
Árpáds
(1232, 1282).
The issuing of documents more regu¬
larly
(1-3
a year) was characteristic from the 1320s, from the 1350s we can
speak of large-scale issuing of documents
(1-10
documents a year). The number
of documents issued a year shows an upward tendency until the age of
Sigis¬
mund.
There are
229
declarations (fassio)
(60%)
and
150
reports (relatio)
(40%)
among the
379
genuine documents that remained from the period before
1403.
That is in accordance with the general average, since there are more declarations
than reports from the whole territory of the country. The
4,7%
rate of
rewritings
is in accordance with that of other ones found elsewhere.
The convent of
Szentbenedek
reported to the bailiff of Bars in
1340
and
1385,
its delegate bore witness to an estate registration by order of the authority
of the county of Bars in
1355.
On the basis of these three reports the county of
Bars can be included as the eighth one in the list of seven counties
—
mainly
situated in Transdanubia
—
that sometimes gave orders to the places of authenti¬
cation having relatively small region of attraction, which therefore had mobiliz-
able power reserve.
The territorial competence of the place of authentication covered the
county of Bars before the reforms of
1351/1353.
It managed matters on the terri¬
tories of Nyitra and
Hont
which were in the neighbourhood of Bars occasionally,
in further counties only exceptionally, in the second half of the 14th century the
proportion of cases of
Hont, Komárom,
Nyitra and
Turóc
counties increased both
in the case of declarations and reports also demanding presence on the spot. The
further parts of the counties of
Komárom
and Nyitra and the county of
Trencsén
also belonged to the report zone at that time. The main territory of the authentica¬
tion activities of the convent of
Garamszentbenedek
was the southern lowlands
of the county Bars, where the influence of the chapters of Nyitra and
Esztergom
as well as the convents of
Ság
and Zobor has to be taken into consideration, too.
When King Matthias allowed the convent of
Garamszentbenedek
to have a new
seal engraved instead of the lost one in
1462,
he determined the counties accu¬
rately which fell within the competence of the place of authentication: the areas
north to the Danube in the counties of
Esztergom
and
Komárom,
the whole ter¬
ritory of Bars, Nyitra,
Hont, Trencsén, Liptó, Árva, Turóc and Zólyom
counties.
The basis of the privilege may have been customary law, so it can be established
that the convent had authentic jurisdiction over a much bigger territory during
the age of
Hunyadi
than during the age of the Anjous.
259
Abstract
The clients of the authentication place belonged to the lower and the
landed nobility, the members of the Barakcsai, Zselizi, Simonyi, Zsemberi and
Forgács
families counted as the most frequent visitors. The
Forgács
family often
made use of the services of the place of authentication of the convent in spite of
the fact that they had been involved in lawsuits with the monastery on several
occasions. The fact that
András,
also called
Gyepes Kisheresztényi,
committed
acts of violence on the estate of the monastery called
Szelepcsény
in
1392,
did
not hinder him from becoming a regular client of the place of authentication
of
Szentbenedek
in the following years. In
1358,
when abbot Nicholas had no
choice but swear a ground oath in order to defend a property of the monastery,
his oath associates came from those noble families who often made use of the
authentication services of the convent. The neighbouring church corporations
only rarely applied to the place of authentication of
Szentbenedek.
From the 1330s and 1340s the names of relatively many monks of the
monastery are known owing to both abbot
Sigfrid,
who managed affairs vigor¬
ously and frequently, and the complete exploration of the relevant sources. The
investigation of the staff shows that both the delegates who pleaded the cause of
the abbey in countrywide court and in places of authentication in the neighbour¬
hood and those who performed tasks for the place of authetication were sepa¬
rated among the brothers. This is shown by the fact that priest Solomon appears
in the sources five times between
1338
and
1341,
each time as the delegate of
the place of authentication, whereas brother Emery acts solely as the lawyer of
the abbot and the convent six times during the same period, in
1341
and
1342.
Between
1362
and
1367
there are ten records of the person of the delegate of
the
płace
of authentication: in nine cases of priest Valentine. It happened that
he travelled three times within one week. He seems to have been entrusted with
this task during that period. However, the examined time periods are too short
to determine for sure, and besides, there are some counterexamples. Because of
the small number of the cases compared to other, busier places of authentication
it was not necessary to regulate which member of the convent should go where.
The delegate's place in the holy orders (subdeacon, deacon, priest) are given
accidentally and inconsistently in the documents. Among the monks taking part
in the work of places of authentication there are some titled assistant ministers
(capel
¡anus), which suggests that the monastery disposed over the priests of the
churches of the villages situated in properties of the monastery and these "tran-
ferred" people also had a part in the external work of the place of authentication
(for example the parish priest of
Pográny).
The overall majority of the delegates
were monks in the 14th century, on some occasions
(1370, 1402)
the familiarises
of the monastery can be found in such a role.
260
Abstract
One of the results of the research is that four documents can be identified
as forgeries. (The document of the convent of
Garamszentbenedek
before
1270:
DL
72 507.
The document of
23
February
1272
of the convent: DL
795, 794.
The report of the convent addressed to King
Sigismund
on
4
June
1388: 87 580.
The document of
27
February
1351
of the convent of
Ság: DF
235 748,
MES
IV.
47.)
In connection with the contradictions of the dating of the documents it
must be stated definitely that the dating does not or not in every case indicate the
time of noting the text down but the time of sealing or rather, the starting point
of becoming effective. The so far questionable opinion, that the archbishop of
Esztergom,
Nicholas V
(1358—1366)
was known as "from
Apáti"
even by his
contemporaries, has been proved by authentication documents of the same age.
(Two documents of
24
September
1368
of the convent of
Garamszentbenedek:
DL
5702, 5703.)
It has been demonstrated that the Benedictine monasteries
Béla
and
Garáb
were united long before
1390,
already prior to
1342.
Translated by Rita Rochlitz
261 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Keglevich, Kristóf 1982- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1044050845 |
| author_facet | Keglevich, Kristóf 1982- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Keglevich, Kristóf 1982- |
| author_variant | k k kk |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV041413652 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)864592319 (DE-599)GBV755704088 |
| era | Geschichte 1075-1405 gnd |
| era_facet | Geschichte 1075-1405 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV041413652</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20150716</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">131113s2012 a||| |||| 00||| hun d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789633061817</subfield><subfield code="c">hibás</subfield><subfield code="9">978-963-306-181-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)864592319</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBV755704088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">hun</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">7,41</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Keglevich, Kristóf</subfield><subfield code="d">1982-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1044050845</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A garamszentbenedeki apátság története az Árpád- és az Anjou-korban</subfield><subfield code="b">1075 - 1403</subfield><subfield code="c">Keglevich Kristóf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Szeged</subfield><subfield code="b">Szegedi Tudományegyetem Történeti Intézete</subfield><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">270 S., [1] gef. Bl.</subfield><subfield code="b">Ill.</subfield><subfield code="c">24 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Capitulum</subfield><subfield code="v">8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Literaturverz. S. 217-223. - Zsfassung in engl. u. slowak. Sprache</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kloster Hronský Beňadik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)7538370-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Benediktiner</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)25880-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1075-1405</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Hronský Beňadik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4025955-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Kloster Hronský Beňadik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)7538370-6</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Hronský Beňadik</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4025955-9</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Benediktiner</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)25880-5</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1075-1405</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Capitulum</subfield><subfield code="v">8</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV022230512</subfield><subfield code="9">8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=026860936&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=026860936&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">909</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09021</subfield><subfield code="g">4373</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">200.9</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09021</subfield><subfield code="g">4373</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">200.9</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09021</subfield><subfield code="g">439</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">909</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09021</subfield><subfield code="g">439</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Hronský Beňadik (DE-588)4025955-9 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Hronský Beňadik |
| id | DE-604.BV041413652 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-20T06:44:21Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9789633061817 |
| language | Hungarian |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-026860936 |
| oclc_num | 864592319 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 270 S., [1] gef. Bl. Ill. 24 cm |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| publishDateSearch | 2012 |
| publishDateSort | 2012 |
| publisher | Szegedi Tudományegyetem Történeti Intézete |
| record_format | marc |
| series | Capitulum |
| series2 | Capitulum |
| spelling | Keglevich, Kristóf 1982- Verfasser (DE-588)1044050845 aut A garamszentbenedeki apátság története az Árpád- és az Anjou-korban 1075 - 1403 Keglevich Kristóf Szeged Szegedi Tudományegyetem Történeti Intézete 2012 270 S., [1] gef. Bl. Ill. 24 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Capitulum 8 Literaturverz. S. 217-223. - Zsfassung in engl. u. slowak. Sprache Kloster Hronský Beňadik (DE-588)7538370-6 gnd rswk-swf Benediktiner (DE-588)25880-5 gnd rswk-swf Geschichte 1075-1405 gnd rswk-swf Hronský Beňadik (DE-588)4025955-9 gnd rswk-swf Kloster Hronský Beňadik (DE-588)7538370-6 b Hronský Beňadik (DE-588)4025955-9 g Benediktiner (DE-588)25880-5 b Geschichte 1075-1405 z DE-604 Capitulum 8 (DE-604)BV022230512 8 Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=026860936&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=026860936&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Abstract |
| spellingShingle | Keglevich, Kristóf 1982- A garamszentbenedeki apátság története az Árpád- és az Anjou-korban 1075 - 1403 Capitulum Kloster Hronský Beňadik (DE-588)7538370-6 gnd Benediktiner (DE-588)25880-5 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)7538370-6 (DE-588)25880-5 (DE-588)4025955-9 |
| title | A garamszentbenedeki apátság története az Árpád- és az Anjou-korban 1075 - 1403 |
| title_auth | A garamszentbenedeki apátság története az Árpád- és az Anjou-korban 1075 - 1403 |
| title_exact_search | A garamszentbenedeki apátság története az Árpád- és az Anjou-korban 1075 - 1403 |
| title_full | A garamszentbenedeki apátság története az Árpád- és az Anjou-korban 1075 - 1403 Keglevich Kristóf |
| title_fullStr | A garamszentbenedeki apátság története az Árpád- és az Anjou-korban 1075 - 1403 Keglevich Kristóf |
| title_full_unstemmed | A garamszentbenedeki apátság története az Árpád- és az Anjou-korban 1075 - 1403 Keglevich Kristóf |
| title_short | A garamszentbenedeki apátság története az Árpád- és az Anjou-korban |
| title_sort | a garamszentbenedeki apatsag tortenete az arpad es az anjou korban 1075 1403 |
| title_sub | 1075 - 1403 |
| topic | Kloster Hronský Beňadik (DE-588)7538370-6 gnd Benediktiner (DE-588)25880-5 gnd |
| topic_facet | Kloster Hronský Beňadik Benediktiner Hronský Beňadik |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=026860936&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=026860936&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV022230512 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT keglevichkristof agaramszentbenedekiapatsagtorteneteazarpadesazanjoukorban10751403 |