Learning democracy and market economy in post-communist Romania:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Iaşi
Institutul European
2012
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Colecţia Academica
Seria Ştiinţe politice ; 163 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Literaturverzeichnis Abstract |
| Beschreibung: | 340 Seiten Diagramme, Karten |
| ISBN: | 9789736118920 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV041390305 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20240715 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 131030s2012 |||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9789736118920 |9 978-973-611-892-0 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)862854263 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV041390305 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-355 |a DE-19 |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 084 | |a MG 94086 |0 (DE-625)122874:12049 |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Tufiş, Claudiu D. |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)140615652 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Learning democracy and market economy in post-communist Romania |c Claudiu D. Tufiş ; foreword by Bogdan Voicu |
| 264 | 1 | |a Iaşi |b Institutul European |c 2012 | |
| 300 | |a 340 Seiten |b Diagramme, Karten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Colecţia Academica : Seria Ştiinţe politice |v 163 | |
| 546 | |a Zusammenfassung englisch, französisch und rumänisch | ||
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Politische Kultur |0 (DE-588)4046540-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Demokratisierung |0 (DE-588)4124941-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Politischer Wandel |0 (DE-588)4175047-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Marktwirtschaft |0 (DE-588)4037653-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Rumänien |0 (DE-588)4050939-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Rumänien |0 (DE-588)4050939-4 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Politischer Wandel |0 (DE-588)4175047-0 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Demokratisierung |0 (DE-588)4124941-0 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Marktwirtschaft |0 (DE-588)4037653-9 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a Politische Kultur |0 (DE-588)4046540-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |C b |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Voicu, Bogdan |e Sonstige |0 (DE-588)1187260282 |4 oth | |
| 830 | 0 | |a Colecţia Academica |v Seria Ştiinţe politice ; 163 |w (DE-604)BV035808626 |9 163 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Regensburg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=026838098&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=026838098&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Literaturverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=026838098&sequence=000004&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Abstract |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 909 |e 22/bsb |f 09049 |g 498 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 909 |e 22/bsb |f 090511 |g 498 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 330.09 |e 22/bsb |f 090511 |g 498 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 330.09 |e 22/bsb |f 09049 |g 498 |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-026838098 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1805086257416503296 |
|---|---|
| adam_text |
Table
of
Contents
List of figures
/ 7
Listoftables/S
List of abbreviations
/ 11
Acknowledgments
/15
Foreword
/17
1.
Introduction
/ 29
Defining characteristics
/ 33
Previous studies
/ 43
Chapter layout
/ 46
2.
Theoretical framework
/ 47
Patterns of political culture
/ 47
Political culture change
/ 55
Political culture components
/ 60
Summary
/ 84
3.
Data and methodology
/ 87
Data
/ 87
Treatment of incomplete data
/ 89
Analyzing multiple surveys
/ 91
Variables used in analysis
/ 92
Data analysis
/119
4.
Diffuse support for the principles of the political system
/123
Diffuse support for democracy
/127
Diffuse support for democratic values
/141
Summary
/156
5.
Diffuse support for the principles of the economic system
/157
Diffuse support for market economy
/ 162
Diffuse support for market economy values: liberal vs. social-democratic
/ 176
Summary
/ 193
The dual transition
/194
6.
Generalized support for the structure of the system
/201
H M
The evolution of institutional trust
/ 202
Trust
in traditional institutions
/219
Trust in the state's institutions
/227
Summary
/238
7.
Specifîc
support for the action of the system
/ 243
The evolution of specific support
/ 244
Specific support for democracy
/ 247
Specific support for market economy
/257
Summary
/ 264
8.
Conclusions
/ 267
Main conclusions and implications
/ 267
Contributions to the literature
/275
Appendix
/ 289
References
/319
Abstract
/335
Resume
/ 337
Rezumat
/339
References
Aligicã, Paul Drago?. 2001. “Romania’s Economic Policy: Before and After the
Elections.” East European Constitutional Review. 10 (1).
Allison, Paul. 2002. Missing Data. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Almond, Gabriel. 1980. “The Intellectual History of the Civic Culture Concept.” Pp. 1-
36 in The Civic Culture Revisited, edited by Gabriel Almond and Sidney Verba.
Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Almond, Gabriel, and Sidney Verba. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and
Democracy in Five Countries. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Anderson, Christopher. 1998. “Parties, Party Systems, and Satisfaction with Democratic
Performance in The New Europe.” Political Studies. 46 (3): 572-588.
Anderson, Christopher, et al (editors). 2005. Losers' Consent: Elections and
Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Åslund, Anders. 1991. “Principles of Privatization.” Pp. 17-31 in Systemic Change and
Stabilization in Eastern Europe, edited by László Csaba. Aldershot: Dartmouth
Publishing.
Bahry, Donna. 1993. “Society Transformed? Rethinking the Social Roots of
Perestroika.” Slavic Review. 52 (3): 512-554.
Bahry, Donna. 1999. “Comrades into Citizens? Russian Political Culture and Public
Support for the Transition.” Slavic Review. 58 (4): 841-853.
Bahry, Donna, Boaz, Cynthia, and Stacy Gordon. 1997. “Tolerance, Transition, and
Support for Civil Liberties in Russia.” Comparative Political Studies. 30 (4): 484-510.
Bahry, Donna, and Brian Silver. 1990. “Public Perceptions and the Dilemmas of Party
Reform in the USSR.” Comparative Political Studies. 23 (2): 171-209.
Barry, Brian. 1970. Economists, Sociologists, and Democracy. London: Collier-Macmillan.
Bartolini, Stefano. 1993. “On Time and Comparative Research.” Journal of Theoretical
Politics. 5 (2): 131-167.
Bädescu, Gabriel. 2003. „Social Trust and Democratization in the Post-Communist
Societies.” Pp. 120-139 in Social Capital and the Transition to Democracy, edited
by Gabriel Bädescu and Eric Uslaner. New York: Routledge.
Beck, Ulrich. 1992. Risk Society: Toward a New Modernity. London: Sage.
Bernhard, Michael, Reenock, Christopher, and Timothy Nordstrom. 2003. “Economic
Performance and Survival in New Democracies: Is There a Honeymoon Effect?”
Comparative Political Studies. 36 (4): 404-431.
Braithwaite, John. 1998. “Institutionalizing Distrust, Enculturating Trust.” Pp. 343-375
in Trust and Governance, edited by Valerie Braithwaite and Margaret Levi. New
York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Brehm, John, and Wendy Rahn. 1997. “Individual-Level Evidence for the Causes and
Consequences of Social Capital.” American Journal of Political Science. 41 (3):
999-1023.
319
LEARNING DEMOCRACY AND MARKET ECONOMY IN POST-COMMUNIST ROMANIA
Bresser-Pereira, Luis Carlos. 1993. “Economic Reforms and Economic Growth:
Efficiency and Politics in Latin America.” Pp. 15-76 in Economic Reforms in New
Democracies: A Social Democratic Approach, edited by Luis Carlos Bresser-
Pereira, José María Maravall, and Adam Przeworski. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Brown, Archie. 2003. “Political Culture and Democratization: The Russian Case in
Comparative Perspective.” Pp. 17-27 in Political Culture in Post-Communist
Europe: Attitudes in New Democracies, edited by Detlef Pollack et al. Aldershot:
Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Brucan, Silviu. 1998. Social Change in Russia and Eastern Europe: From Party Hacks
to Nouveaux Riches. London: Praeger.
Brumann, Christoph. 1999. “Writing for Culture: Why a Successful Concept Should
Not Be Discarded.” Current Anthropology. 40 (Supplement): S1-S27.
Bruszt, László. 1998. “The Politics of Patience: Support of Capitalism.” Pp. 165-195 in
The Postcommunist Citizen, edited by Samuel Barnes and János Simon. Budapest:
Erasmus Foundation and Institute for Political Science of the Hungarian Academy of
Sciences.
Bunce, Valerie. 1990. “The Struggle for Liberal Democracy in Eastern Europe.” World
Policy Journal. 7 (3): 395-430.
Bunce, Valerie. 2003. ‘Rethinking Recent Democratization - Lessons from the
Postcommunist Experience.” World Politics. 55 (2): 167-192.
Canache, Damarys, Mondák, Jeffrey, and Mitchell Seligson. 2001. “Meaning and
Measurement in Cross-National Research on Satisfaction with Democracy.” Public
Opinion Quarterly. 65 (4): 506-528.
Carothers, Thomas. 1996. Assessing Democracy Assistance: The Case of Romania.
Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Casper, Gretchen, and Claudiu Tufiş. 2003. “Correlation versus Interchangeability: The
Limited Robustness of Empirical Findings on Democracy Using Highly Correlated
Datasets.” Political Analysis. 11 (2): 196-203.
Centeno, Miguel Antonio. 1994. “Between Rocky Democracies and Hard Markets:
Dilemmas of the Double Transition.” Annual Review of Sociology. 20: 125-147.
Cemea, Emil. 2003. Criza dreptului în România la 1907. Bucureşti: Universitatea din
Bucureşti.
Ciobanu, Adrian, and Speranţa Pârciog. 1999. Background Study on Employment and
Labour Market in Romania. Torino: European Training Foundation.
Cioroianu, Adrian. 2005. Pe umerii lui Marx. O introducere in istoria comunismului
romanesc. Bucureşti: Curtea Veche.
Civil Society Development Foundation. 2005. Dialogue for Civil Society: Report on the
State of Civil Society in Romania 2005. Available online at
http://www.fdsc.ro/documente/13 .pdf
Clark, Terry. 2002. Beyond Post-Communist Studies: Political Science and the New
Democracies of Europe. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.
Cohen, Anthony. 1985. The Symbolic Construction of Community. New York: Ellis
Horwood.
320
References
Coleman, James. 1999. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.” Pp. 13-39 in
Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective, edited by Partha Dasgupta and Ismail
Serageldin. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Colt, Radu. 1999. “80 în Bucureşti şi mai puţin de 1000 în toată ţara.” Magazin Istoric. 53 (6).
Colton, Timothy. 1996. “Economics and Voting in Russia.” Post-Soviet Affairs. 12 (4):
289-317.
Colton, Timothy. 2000. Transitional Citizens: Voters and What Influences Them in the
New Russia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Converse, Philip. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” Pp. 206-261
in Ideology and Discontent, edited by David Apter. New York: The Free Press of
Glencoe.
Converse, Philip. 1970. “Attitudes and Non-Attitudes: Continuation of a Dialogue.” Pp.
168-190 in The Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems, edited by Edward Tufte.
Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Crawford, Beverly. 1995. “Post-Communist Political Economy: A Framework for the
Analysis of Reform.” Pp. 3-42 in Markets, States՝, and Democracy: The Political
Economy of Post-Communist Transformation, edited by Beverly Crawford. Boulder:
Westview Press.
Cronbach, Lee. 1951. “Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests.”
Psychometrika. 16 (3): 297-334.
Dahl, Robert. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dahl, Robert. 1996. The Future of Democratic Theory. Estudio/Working Paper 90.
Madrid: Juan March Institute of Study and Research.
Dahl, Robert. 1998. On Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dalton, Russell. 1994. “Communists and Democrats: Attitudes Towards Democracy in
the Two Germanys.” British Journal of Political Science. 24 (4): 469-493.
Dalton, Russell. 1999. “Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies.” Pp. 57-
77 in Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, edited by Pippa
Norris. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dalton, Russell. 2000. “Citizen Attitudes and Political Behavior.” Comparative
Political Studies. 33 (6/7): 912-940.
Dalton, Russell, and Martin Wattenberg. 2000. Parties without Partisans: Political
Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dasgupta, Partha 1988. “Trust as a Commodity.” Pp. 49-72 in Trust: Making and Breaking
Cooperative Relations, edited by Diego Gambetta. New York: Basil Blackwell.
Davidson, Roger, and Glenn Parker. 1972. “Positive Support for Political Institutions:
The Case of Congress.” Western Political Quarterly. 25 (4): 600-612.
Delhey, Jan, and Verena Tobsch. 2003. “Satisfaction with Democracy and Its Sources:
The Cases of East Germany and Hungary.” Pp. 115-131 in Political Culture in Post-
Communist Europe: Attitudes in New Democracies, edited by Detlef Pollack et al.
Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Demekas, Dimitri, and Mohsin Khan. 1991. The Romanian Economic Reform Program.
IMF Working Paper 91/80. Available at SSRN: http://ssm.com/abstract=885002.
Diamandouros, Nikiforos, and Stephen Larrabee. 1999. Democratization in
Southeastern Europe: Theoretical Considerations and Evolving Trends.
Estudio/Working Paper 129. Madrid: Juan March Institute of Study and Research.
321
LEARNING DEMOCRACY AND MARKET ECONOMY IN POST-COMMUNIST ROMANIA
Diamond, Larry. 1992. “Economic Development and Democracy Reconsidered.”
American Behavioral Scientist. 35 (4): 450-499.
Diamond, Larry (ed.). 1993. Political Culture and Democracy in Developing Countries.
Boulder: L. Rienner Publishers.
Diamond, Larry. 1994. “Toward Democratic Consolidation.” Journal of Democracy. 5
(3) : 4-17.
Diamond, Larry. 1997. Civil Society and the Development of Democracy.
Estudio/Working Paper 101. Madrid: Juan March Institute of Study and Research.
Diamond, Larry. 1998. Political Culture and Democratic Consolidation.
Estudio/Working Paper 118. Madrid: Juan March Institute of Study and Research.
Diamond, Larry. 1999. Developing Democracy Toward Consolidation. Baltimore:
Johns Hopkins University Press.
di Palma, Giuseppe. 1990. To Craft Democracies: An Essay on Democratic Transition.
Berkeley: University of California Press.
di Palma, Giuseppe. 1991. “Legitimation from the Top to Civil Society: Politico-
Cultural Change in Eastern Europe.” World Politics. 44 (1): 49-80.
Dowley, Kathleen, and Brian Silver. 2003. “Social Capital, Ethnicity and Support for
Democracy in the Post-Communist States.” Pp. 95-119 in Social Capital and the
Transition to Democracy, edited by Gabriel Badescu and Eric Uslaner. New York:
Routledge.
Duch, Raymond. 1993. “Tolerating Economic Reform: Popular Support for Transition
to a Free Market in the Republics of the Former Soviet Union.” American Political
Science Review. 87 (3): 590-608.
Easton, David. 1965. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley.
Easton, David. 1975. “A Re-Assessment of the Concept of Political Support.” British
Journal of Political Science. 5 (4): 435-457.
Eckstein, Harry. 1988. “A Culturalist Theory of Political Change.” American Political
Science Review. 82 (3): 789-804.
Ekiert, Grzegorz, and Jan Kubik. 1998. “Contentious Politics in New Democracies -
East Germany, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia, 1989-93.” World Politics. 50 (4):
547-581.
Ekiert, Grzegorz, and Jan Kubik. 1999. Rebellious Civil Society: Popular Protest and
Democratic Consolidation in Poland\ 1989-1993. Ann Arbor: University of
Michigan Press.
Emigh, Rebecca Jean. 1997. “The Power of Negative Thinking: The Use of Negative
Case Methodology in the Development of Sociological Theory.” Theory and
Society. 26 (5): 649-684.
Evans, Geoffrey, and Stephen Whitefield. 1995. “The Politics and Economics of
Democratic Commitment - Support for Democracy in Transition Societies.” British
Journal of Political Science. 25 (4): 485-514.
Finifter, Ada. 1996. “Attitudes toward Individual Responsibility and Political Reform in
the Former Soviet Union.” American Political Science Review. 90 (1): 138-152.
Finifter, Ada, and Ellen Mickiewicz. 1992. “Redefining the Political System of the
USSR: Mass Support for Political Change.” American Political Science Review. 86
(4) : 857-874.
322
References
Finkel, Steven, Humphries, Stan, and Karl-Dieter Opp. 2001. “Socialist Values and the
Development of Democratic Support in the Former East Germany.” International
Political Science Review. 22 (4): 339-361.
Fiorina, Morris. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New
Haven: Yale University Press.
Firebaugh, Glenn, and Dumitru Sandu. 1998. “Who Supports Marketization and
Democratization in Post-Communist Romania?” Sociological Forum. 13 (3): 521-
541.
Fleron, Frederic, and Richard Ahl. 1998. “Does the Public Matter for Democratization
in Russia? What We Have Learned from Third Wave Transitions and Public
Opinion Surveys.” In Can Democracy Take Root in Post-Soviet Russia?
Explorations in State Society Relations, edited by Harry Eckstein et al. Lanham,
MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Frunză, Mălina, and Bogdan Voicu. 1997. “Statul şi ţăranul român.” Revista de
Cercetări Sociale. 3: 118-130.
Fuchs, Dieter, Guidorossi, Giovanna, and Palie Svensson. 1999. “Support for the
Democratic System”. Pp. 323-353 in Citizens and the State, edited by Hans-Dieter
Klingeman and Dieter Fuchs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fukuyama, Francis. 1995. Trust: Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New
York: Free Press.
Gabriel, Oscar. 1995. “Political Efficacy and Trust.” Pp. 357-389 in The Impact of
Values. Edited by Jan van Deth and Elinor Scarbrough. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gabriel, Oscar, and Jan van Deth. 1995. “Political Interest.” Pp. 390-411 in The Impact
of Values. Edited by Jan van Deth and Elinor Scarbrough. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Gambetta, Diego. 1988. “Can We Trust Trust?” Pp. 213-237 in Trust: Making and
Breaking Cooperative Relations, edited by Diego Gambetta. New York: Basil
Blackwell.
Gati, Charles. 1996. “If Not Democracy, What? Leaders, Laggards, and Losers in the
Postcommunist World.” Pp. 168-198 in Postcommunism: Four Perspectives, edited
by Michael Mandelbaum. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York:
Basic Books.
Georgescu, Vlad. 1987. “Romania in the 1980s: The Legacy of Dynastic Socialism.”
Eastern European Politics and Societies. 2(1): 69-93.
Gerson, Kathleen. 1985. Hard Choices: How Women Decide about Work, Career, and
Motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gibson, James. 1996a. “A Mile Wide but an Inch Deep(?): The Structure of Democratic
Commitments in the Former USSR.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (2):
396-420.
Gibson, James. 1996b. “Political and Economic Markets: Changes in the Connections
Between Attitudes Toward Political Democracy and a Market Economy Within the
Mass Culture of Russia and Ukraine”. The Journal of Politics. 58 (4): 954-984.
Gibson, James. 2001. “Social Networks, Civil Society, and the Prospects for
Consolidating Russia’s Democratic Transition.” American Journal of Political
Science 45 (1): 51-68.
323
LEARNING DEMOCRACY AND MARKET ECONOMY IN POST-COMMUNIST ROMANIA
Gibson, James. 2002. “Becoming Tolerant? Short-Term Changes in Russian Political
Culture.” British Journal of Political Science. 32 (2): 309-333.
Gibson, James, Caldeira, Gregory, and Vanessa Baird. 1998. “On the Legitimacy of
National High Courts.” American Political Science Review. 92 (2): 343-358.
Gibson, James, Duch, Raymond, and Kent Tedin. 1992. “Democratic Values and the
Transformation of the Soviet Union.” Journal of Politics. 54 (2): 329-371.
Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late
Modern Age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Greskovits, Béla. 1997. “Crisis-Proof Democracy: On Failed Predictions and the
Realities of Eastern Europe’s Transformations.” International Politics. 34 (2): 193-
211.
Haggard, Stephan, and Robert Kaufman. 1989. “The Politics of Stabilization and
Structural Adjustment.” In Developing Country Debt and Economic Performance.
Volume 1: The International Financial System, edited by Jeffrey Sachs. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Haggard, Stephan, and Robert Kaufman. 1995. The Political Economy of Democratic
Transitions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hahn, Jeffrey. 1991. “Continuity and Change in Russian Political Culture.” British
Journal of Political Science. 21 (4): 393-421.
Hahn, Jeffrey. 1995. “Changes in Contemporary Russian Political Culture.” In Political
Culture and Civil Society in Russia and the New States of Eurasia, edited by
Vladimir Tismåneanu. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Hall, John A. 1995. “After the Vacuum: Post-Communism in the Light of Tocqueville.”
Pp. 82-102 in Markets, States, and Democracy: The Political Economy of Post-
Communist Transformation, edited by Beverly Crawford. Boulder: Westview Press.
Hardin, Russell. 1998. “Trust in Government.” Pp. 9-27 in Trust and Governance,
edited by Valerie Braithwaite and Margaret Levi. New York: Russell Sage
Foundation.
Harris, Marvin. 1975. Culture, People, Nature: An Introduction to General
Anthropology. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.
Hofferbert, Richard, and Hans-Dieter Klingemann. 1999. “Remembering the Bad Old
Days: Human Rights, Economic Conditions, and Democratic Performance in
Transitional Regimes.” European Journal of Political Research. 36 (2): 155-174.
Hofferbert, Richard, and Hans-Dieter Klingemann. 2001. “Democracy and Its
Discontents in Post-Wall Germany”. International Political Science Review. 22 (4):
363-378.
Holmes, Leslie. 1993. The End of Communist Power: Anti-Corruption Campaigns and
Legitimation Crisis. Cambridge: Polity.
Holmes, Leslie. 2003. “Corruption and Democratization: Problems of Legitimation in
Russia and Other Post-Communist States.” Paper presented to the Australasian
Political Studies Association Conference. University of Tasmania, Hobart. 29
September - 1 October 2003.
Honaker, James, King, Gary, and Matthew Blackwell. 2005. Amelia II: A Program for
Missing Data. Software available at http://gking.harvard.edu/amelia/.
Hough, Jerry. 1994. “The Russian Election of 1993: Public Attitudes Toward Economic
Reform and Democratization.” Post-Soviet Affairs. 10(1): 1-37.
324
References
Howard, Marc Moije. 2003. The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huntington, Samuel. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. Cambridge: Harvard
University Press.
Huntington, Samuel. 1996. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World
Order. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Inglehart, Ronald. 1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Societies. Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
Inglehart, Ronald. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic,
and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Institutul National de Statistică. 2005. România în cifre. Bucureşti: Institutul Naţional
de Statistică.
Jacobs, Jörg, Müller, Olaf, and Gert Pickel. 2003. “Persistence of the Democracies in
Central and Eastern Europe: Consolidation, Stability, and People’s Power of
Resisting.” Pp. 91-114 in Political Culture in Post-Communist Europe: Attitudes in
New Democracies, edited by Detlef Pollack et al. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Kaase, Max. 1994. “Political Culture and Political Consolidation in Central and Eastern
Europe.” Pp. 233-274 in Political Culture and Political Structure: Theoretical and
Empirical Studies, Voi. II, Research on Democracy and Society, edited by Frederick
Weil. Greenwich: JAI Press Inc.
Kaase, Max. 1999. “Interpersonal Trust, Political Trust and Non-institutionalized
Political Participation in Western Europe.” West European Politics. 22 (3): 1-21.
Kaase, Max, and Hans-Dieter Klingeman. 1994. “The Cumbersome Way to Partisan
Orientations in a ‘New’ Democracy: The Case of the Former GDR”. Pp. 123-156 in
Elections at Home and Abroad: Essays in Honor of Warren E. Miller, edited by
Kent Jennings and Thomas Mann. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Keesing, Roger. 1981. Cultural Anthropology: A Contemporary Perspective. Fort
Worth: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Keiser, Henry. 1974. “An Index of Factorial Simplicity.” Psychometrika. 39 (1): 31-36.
Kiewiet, Roderick. 1983. Macroeconomics Micropolitics: The Electoral Effects of
Economic Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
King, Charles. 2000. “Post-Communism: Transition, Comparison, and the End of
‘Eastern Europe’.” World Politics 53 (1): 143-172.
King, Gary et al. 2001. “Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative
Algorithm for Multiple Imputation.” American Political Science Review. 95 (1): 49-69.
Klingeman, Hans-Dieter. 1999. “Mapping Political Support in the 1990s: A Global
Analysis”. Pp. 31-56 in Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic
Government, edited by Pippa Norris. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kolarska-Boblinka, Lena. 1988. “Social Interests, Egalitarian Attitudes, and the Change
of Economic Order.” Social Research. 55 (1/2): 111-138.
Kubicek, Paul. 2000. “Post-communist Political Studies: Ten Years Later, Twenty
Years Behind?” Communist and Post-Communist Studies. 33 (3): 295-309.
Kullberg, Judith, and William Zimmerman. 1999. “Liberal Elites, Socialist Masses, and
Problems of Russian Democracy.” World Politics. 51 (3): 323-358.
Lane, Ruth. 1992. “Political Culture: residual Category or General Theory?”
Comparative Political Studies. 25 (3): 362-387.
325
LEARNING DEMOCRACY AND MARKET ECONOMY IN POST-COMMUNIST ROMANIA
Lewis-Beck, Michael. 1988. Economics and Elections: The Major Western
Democracies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Lijphart, Arend. 1971. “Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method.” American
Political Science Review. 65 (3): 682-693.
Linde, Jonas, and Joakim Ekman. 2003. “Satisfaction with Democracy: A Note on a
Frequently Used Indicator in Comparative Politics”. European Journal of Political
Research. 42(3): 391-408.
Linz, Juan. 1978. “Crisis, Breakdown, and Requilibration.” In The Breakdown of
Democratic Regimes, edited by Juan Linz and Alfred Stepan. Baltimore: Johns
Hopkins University Press.
Linz, Juan. 1990. “Transitions to Democracy.” The Washington Quarterly. 3.
Linz, Juan, and Alfred Stepan. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and
Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America and Post-communist Europe.
Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1960. Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. Garden
City: Doubleday.
Listhaug, Ola, and Matti Wiberg. 1995. “Confidence in Political and Private
Institutions.” Pp. 298-322 in Citizens and the State, edited by Hans-Dieter
Klingemann and Dieter Fuchs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Little, Roderick, and Donald Rubin. 2002. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. New
York: Wiley.
Loewenberg, Gerhard. 1971. “The Influence of Parliamentary Behavior on Regime
Stability.” Comparative Politics. 3 (2): 177-200.
Lovatt, Catherine. 1999. “Ceausescu’s Return”. Central Europe Review. 1(9). Available
online at http://www.ce-review.Org/99/9/lovatt9.html.
Luhmann, Niklas. 1988. “Familiarity, Confidence, Trust.” Pp. 94-107 in Trust: Malang
and Breaking Cooperative Relations, edited by Diego Gambetta. New York: Basil
Blackwell.
MacKuen, Michael, Erikson, Robert, and James Stimson. 1992. “Peasants or Bankers?
The American Electorate and the U.S. Economy.” American Political Science
Review. 86 (3): 597-611.
Mancini, Janet. 1980. Strategic Styles: Coping in the Inner City. Hanover: University
Press of New England.
Markus, Gregory. 1988. “The Impact of Personal and National Economic Conditions on
the Presidential Vote: A Pooled Cross-Sectional Analysis.” American Journal of
Political Science. 32(1): 137-154.
Marraval, Jose Maria. 1997. Regimes, Politics and Markets: Democratization and
Economic Change in Southern and Eastern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Martin, Irene. 2003. “Interest in Politics and the Political Culture Approach: The Case
of the New Democracies of Southern and Eastern Europe.” Pp. 71-90 in Political
Culture in Post-Communist Europe: Attitudes in New Democracies, edited by Detlef
Pollack et al. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Mason, David, and James Kluegel. 2000a. “Introduction: Public Opinion and Political
Change in the Postcommunist States.” In Marketing Democracy: Changing Opinion
About Inequality and Politics in East Central Europe, edited by David Mason and
James Kluegel. Lanham: Rowman Littlefield Publishers.
326
References
Mason, David, and James Kiuegel. 2000b. Marketing Democracy : Changing Opinion
About Inequality and Politics in East Central Europe. Lanham: Rowman
Littlefield Publishers.
McAllister, Ian. 1999. “The Economic Performance of Governments.” Pp. 188-203 in
Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance, edited by Pippa
Norris. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McFaul, Michael. 2002. “The Fourth Wave of Democracy and Dictatorship:
Noncooperative Transitions in the Postcommunist World.” World Politics. 54 (2):
212-244.
McIntosh, Mary, and Martha Abele Maclver. 1992. “Coping with Freedom and
Uncertainty: Public Opinion in Hungary, Poland, and Czechoslovakia, 1989-1992.”
International Journal of Public Opinion. 4 (4): 375-391.
McIntosh, Mary et al. 1994. “Publics Meet Market Democracy in Central and East
Europe, 1991-1993.” Slavic Review. 53 (2): 483-512.
McIntosh, Mary et al. 1995. “Minority Rights and Majority Rule: Ethnic Tolerance in
Romania and Bulgaria.” Social Forces. 73 (3): 939-968.
Merkel, Wolfgang. 1996. Institutions and Democratic Consolidation in East Central
Europe. Madrid: Juan March Institute of Study and Research.
Merton, Robert. 1957. Social Theory and Social Structure. Glencoe: Free Press.
Mihaie§, Mircea. 1999. “The Neighbors of Kafka: Intellectual’s Note from the
Underground.” Pp. 252-258 in The Revolutions of 1989, edited by Vladimir
Tismáneanu. London: Routledge.
Miller, Arthur. 1974. “Political Issues and Trust in Government: 1964-1970.” The
American Political Science Review. 68(3): 951-972.
Miller, Arthur, Hesli, Vickie, and William Reisinger. 1994. “Reassessing Mass Support
for Political and Economic Change in the Former USSR.” American Political
Science Review. 88 (2): 399-411.
Miller, Arthur, Hesli, Vickie, and William Reisinger. 1997. “Conceptions of Democracy
Among Mass and Elites in Post-Soviet Societies.” British Journal of Political
Science. 27 (2): 157-190.
Miller, Arthur, and Ola Listhaug. 1999. “Political Performance and Institutional Trust.”
Pp. 204-216 in Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance, edited
by Pippa Norris. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Miller, Arthur, Reisinger, William, and Vicki Hesli. 1993. Public Opinion and Regime
Change: The New Politics of Post-Soviet Societies. Boulder: Westview Press.
Miller, William, White, Stephen, and Paul Heywood. 1998. Values and Political
Change in Postcommunist Europe. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.
Mishler, William, and Detlef Pollack. 2003. “On Culture, Thick and Thin: Toward a
Neo-Cultural Synthesis.” Pp. 237-256 in Political Culture in Post-Communist
Europe, edited by Detlef Pollack et al. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Mishler, William, and Richard Rose. 1996. “Trajectories of Fear and Hope - Support for
Democracy in Post-Communist Europe.” Comparative Political Studies. 28 (4):
553-581.
Mishler, William, and Richard Rose. 1997. “Trust, Distrust, and Skepticism: Popular
Evaluations of Civil and Political Institutions in Post-Communist Societies.” Journal
of Politics. 59 (2): 418-451.
327
LEARNING DEMOCRACY AND MARKET ECONOMY IN POST-COMMUNIST ROMANIA
Mishler, William, and Richard Rose. 1999. “Five Years After the Fall: Trajectories of
Support for Democracy in Post-Communist Europe.” Pp. 78-99 in Critical Citizens:
Global Support for Democratic Government, edited by Pippa Norris. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Mishler, William, and Richard Rose. 2001a. “Political Support for Incomplete
Democracies: Realist vs. Idealist Theories and Measures.” International Political
Science Review. 22(4): 303-320.
Mishler, William, and Richard Rose. 2001b. “What Are the Origins of Political Trust:
Testing Institutional and Cultural Theories in Post-Communist Societies.”
Comparative Political Studies. 34 (1): 30-62.
Mishler, William, and Richard Rose. 2002. “Learning and Re-Learning Regime
Support: The Dynamics of Post-Communist Regimes.” European Journal of
Political Research. 41 (1): 5-36.
Moisés, José Alvaro. 2006. “Citizens’ Distrust in Democratic Institutions.”
International Review of Sociology. 16 (3): 593-616.
Morlino, Leonardo, and Jose Montero. 1995. “Legitimacy and Democracy in Southern
Europe.” Pp. 231-260 in The Politics of Democratic Consolidation: Southern
Europe in Comparative Perspective, edited by Richard Gunther, Nikiforos
Diamandouros, and Hans-Jürgen Puhle. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Muller, Edward. 1970. “The Representation of Citizens by Political Authorities:
Consequences for Regime Support.” American Political Science Review. 64 (4):
1149-1166.
Muller, Edward, and Thomas Jukam. 1977. “On the Meaning of Political Support.”
American Political Science Review. 71 (4): 1561-1595.
Munck, Gerardo. 2004. “Democracy Studies: Agendas, Findings, Challenges.” Pp. 65-
97 in Democratization: The State of the Art, edited by Dirk Berg-Schlosser.
Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaften.
National Institute of Statistics. 2000. Romanian Statistical Yearbook: 2000. Bucureşti:
National Institute of Statistics.
National Institute of Statistics. 2005. Romanian Statistical Yearbook: 2005. Bucureşti:
National Institute of Statistics.
Nelson, Joan. 1995. “Linkages Between Politics and Economics.” Pp. 45-58 in
Economic Reform and Democracy, edited by Larry Diamond and Mark Plattner.
Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Newton, Kenneth. 1997. “Social Capital and Democracy.” American Behavioral
Scientist. 40 (5): 575-586.
Newton, Kenneth. 1999. “Social and Political Trust in Established Democracies.” Pp.
169-187 in Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, edited by
Pippa Norris. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Niedermayer, Oscar. 1990. The European Citizens ’ Interest in Politics and Their
Attitudes and Behavior Concerning the EC and European Integration. Reports of
the Zentrum für Europäische Umfrageanalysen und Studien. 90 — 6. Mannheim:
Zentrum für Europäische Umfrageanalysen und Studien.
Niemi, Richard, Mueller, John, and Tom Smith. 1989. Trends in Public Opinion. New
York: Greenwood.
328
References
Norris, Pippa. 1999. Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Norris, Pippa. 2002. Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Nunnally, Jum. 1978. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
O’Donnell, Guillermo. 1996. “Illusions About Consolidation.” Journal of Democracy. 7
(2): 34-51.
OECD. 1998. OECD Economic Surveys: Romania 1997/1998. Available online at
http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/34/19/32365579.pdf.
Offe, Claus. 1997. Varieties of Transition: The East European and East German
Experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Offe, Claus. 1998. “Designing Institutions in East European Transitions.” Pp. 199-226
in The Theory of Institutional Design, edited by Robert Goodin. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Ost, David. 1992. “Labor and Societal Transition.” Problems of Communism. 33 (5-6): 48-51.
Ostrom, Elinor, and Toh-Kyeong Ahn. 2001. A Social Science Perspective on Social
Capital: Social Capital and Collective Action. Paper presented at the 2002 Annual
Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA, August 29 -
September 1,2002.
Park, Chong-Min, and Doh Chull Shin. 2006. “Popular Support for Democracy and Its
Institutions in Korea: The Dynamics and Sources of Regime Support and
Institutional Trust.” International Review of Sociology. 16 (3): 665-681.
Peoples, James, and Garrick Bailey. 1994. Humanity: An Introduction to Cultural
Anthropology. St. Paul: West.
Picket, Andreas, and Helmut Wiesenthal. 1997. The Grand Experiment: Debating Shock
Therapy; Transition Theory, and the East German Experience. Boulder: Westview
Press.
Plasser, Fritz, and Peter Ulram. 1996. “Measuring Political Culture in East Central
Europe: Political Trust and System Support.” Pp. 3-33 in Political Culture in East
Central Europe, edited by Fritz Plasser and Andreas Probersky. London: Routledge.
Plasser, Fritz, Ulram, Peter A., and Harald Waldrauch. 1998. Democratic Consolidation
in East Central Europe. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Pollack, Detlef et al. 2003. “Introduction.” Pp. xi-xxii in Political Culture in Post-
Communist Europe, edited by Detlef Pollack et al. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Pop, Liliana. 2006. Democratising Capitalism? The Political Economy of Post-
communist Transformations in Romania, 1989 - 2001. Manchester: Manchester
University Press.
Pop-Eleche§, Grigore. 1999. “Separated at Birth or Separated by Birth? The Communist
Successor Parties in Romania and Hungary.” East European Politics and Societies.
13(1): 117-147.
Portes, Alejandro. 1998. “Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modem
Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology. 24: 1-24.
Pridham, Geoffrey. 1994. “Democratic Transitions in Theory and Practice: Southern
European Lessons for Eastern Europe?” Pp. 15-37 in Democratization in Eastern
Europe: Domestic and International Perspectives, edited by Geoffrey Pridham and
Tatu Vanhanen. London: Routledge.
329
LEARNING DEMOCRACY AND MARKET ECONOMY IN POST-COMMUNIST ROMANIA
Pridham, Geoffrey. 1995. “The International Context of Democratic Consolidation:
Southern Europe in Comparative Perspective.” Pp. 166-203 in The Politics of
Democratic Consolidation: Southern Europe in Comparative Perspective, edited by
Richard Gunther, Nikiforos Diamandouros, and Hans-Jürgen Puhle. Baltimore:
Johns Hopkins University Press.
Pridham, Geoffrey. 2000. “Democratization in the Balkan Countries.” Pp. 1-23 in
Experimenting with Democracy: Regime Change in the Balkans, edited by Tom
Gallagher and Geoffrey Pridham. London: Routledge.
Przeworski, Adam. 1986. “Some Problems in the Study of the Transitions to
Democracy.” Pp. 47-63 in Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Comparative
Perspectives, edited by Guillermo O’Donnell, Philippe Schmitter, and Laurence
Whitehead. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms
in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Przeworski, Adam. 1993. “Economic Reforms, Public Opinion, and Political
Institutions: Poland in the Eastern European Perspective.” Pp. 132-198 in Economic
Reforms in New Democracies: A Social Democratic Approach, edited by Luis
Carlos Bresser Pereira, Jose Maria Maravall, and Adam Przeworski. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Przeworski, Adam. 1996. “Public Support for Economic Reforms in Poland.”
Comparative Political Studies. 29 (5): 520-543.
Putnam, Robert. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy.
Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Pye, Lucien. 2003. “Culture as Destiny.” Pp. 3-16 in Political Culture in Post-
Communist Europe, edited by Detlef Pollack et al. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing
Limited.
Remmer, Karen. 1990. “Democracy and Economic Crisis: The Latin American
Experience.” World Politics. 42 (3): 315-355.
Rohrschneider, Robert. 1999. Learning Democracy. Democratic and Economic Values
in Unified Germany. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rohrschneider, Robert. 2003. “Learning Democracy: Do Democratic Values Adjust to
New Institutions?” Pp. 47-70 in Political Culture in Post-Communist Europe, edited
by Detlef Pollack et al. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Rohrschneider, Robert, and Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck. 2003. “Trust in Democratic
Institutions in Germany: Theory and Evidence Ten Years After Unification.” Pp. 35-
58 in The Berlin Republic: German Unification and a Decade of Changes, edited by
Winand Gellner and John Robertson. London: F. Cass.
Roland, Gerard. 2004. Transition and Economics: Politics, Markets, and Firms.
Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Rose, Richard. 1992. “Escaping from Absolute Dissatisfaction: A Trial-and-Error Model
of Change in Eastern Europe.” Journal of Theoretical Politics. 4 (4): 371-393.
Rose, Richard. 2001. “How People View Democracy: A Diverging Europe.” Journal of
Democracy. 12 (1): 93-106.
Rose, Richard, and Ian McAllister. 1990. The Loyalties of Voters: A Lifetime Learning
Model. London: Sage Publications.
330
References
Rose, Richard, and William Mishler. 1994. “Mass Reaction to Regime Change in
Eastem-Europe - Polarization or Leaders and Laggards.” British Journal of Political
Science. 24(2): 159-182.
Rose, Richard, and William Mishler. 1996. “Trajectories of Fear and Hope: Support for
Democracy in Post-Communist Europe.” Comparative Political Studies. 28 (4): 553-5 81.
Rose, Richard, Mishler, William, and Christian Haerpfer. 1998. Democracy and Its
Alternatives: Understanding Post-Communist Societies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins
University Press.
Rose, Richard, Mishler, William, and Neil Munro. 2006. Russia Transformed:
Developing Popular Support for a New Regime. Oxford: Cambridge University Press.
Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 2001. “Trust and Honesty in Post-socialist Societies.” Kyklos.
54 (2/3): 415-444.
Rothstein, Bo, and Dietlind Stolle. 2002. “How Political Institutions Create and Destroy
Social Capital: An Institutional Theory of Generalized Trust.” Paper presented at the
98th Meeting of the American Political Science Association in Boston, MA, August
29 - September 2, 2002.
Rubin, Donald. 1987. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: Wiley.
Rupnik, Jacques. 1997. “The Politics of Transition.” In Democracy in Romania:
Assessment Mission Report. Stockholm: International IDEA.
Sachs, Jeffrey. 1990. “Eastern Europe’s Economies: What Is to Be Done?” The
Economist. January 12: 19-24.
Sandholtz, Wayne, and Rein Taagepera. 2005. “Corruption, Culture, and Communism.”
International Review of Sociology. 15 (1): 109-131.
Sandu, Dumitru. 1993. “Value Profile of the Post-1989 Romanian Society.” Paper
presented at the Population Research Institute, Pennsylvania State University,
University Park, PA. October 1993.
Sandu, Dumitru. 2006. “Explorarea Europei prin migraţii pentru muncă: 1990-2006.”
Pp. 13-39 in Locuirea temporară în străinătate. Migraţia economică a românilor:
1990-2006, edited by Dumitru Sandu. Bucureşti: Fundaţia pentru o Societate
Deschisă.
Sandu, Paula, and Claudiu Tufiş. 2000. “Biertan în căutarea viitorului.” In Diagnoza
Problemelor Sociale Comunitare: Studii de caz, edited by Elena Zamfir and Marian
Preda. Bucureşti: Expert.
Schafer, Joseph. 1997. Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data. London: Chapman and
Hall.
Schafer, Joseph. 2000. Norm for Windows 95/98/NT: Multiple Imputation of Incomplete
Multivariate Data under a Normal Model. Version 2.03 — November 2000. Software
available at http://www.stat.psu.edu/~jls/norm203.exe.
Schedler, Andreas. 1998. “What is Democratic Consolidation?” Journal of Democracy.
9 (2): 91-107.
Schopflin, George. 1994. “Postcommunism: The Problems of Democratic
Construction.” Daedalus. 123 (3): 127-141.
Scurtu, loan, Stănescu-Stanciu, Theodora, and Georgiana Margareta Scurtu. 2002.
Istoria românilor între anii 1918-1940. Bucureşti: Universitatea din Bucureşti.
Seligman, Adam. 1997. The Problem of Trust. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
331
LEARNING DEMOCRACY AND MARKET ECONOMY IN POST-COMMUNIST ROMANIA
Shafir, Michael. 1997. “Romania’s Road to ‘Normalcy’.” Journal of Democracy. 8 (2):
144-158.
Simái, Mihály. 1999. “Issues and Experiences in the Practice of Democratization:
Models and Paradigms.” Pp. 37-59 in The Democratic Process and the Market:
Challenges of the Transition, edited by Mihály Simái. New York: United Nations
University Press.
Sniderman, Paul, Tetlock, Philip, and Laurel Elms. 2001. “Public Opinion and
Democratic Politics: The Problem of Nonattitudes and the Social Construction of
Political Judgment”. Pp. 254-288 in Citizens and Politics: Perspectives from
Political Psychology, edited by James Kuklinski. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Sorensen, Georg. 1993. Democracy and Democratization: Processes and Prospects in a
Changing World. Boulder: Westview Press.
Swidler, Ann. 1986. “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies.” American
Sociological Review. 51 (2): 273-286.
Sztompka, Piotr. 1996a. “Looking Back: The Year 1989 as a Cultural and Civilizational
Break.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies. 29 (2): 115-129.
Sztompka, Piotr. 1998. “Trust, Distrust and Two Paradoxes of Democracy.” European
Journal of Social Theory. 1 (1): 19-32.
Sztompka, Piotr. 1999. Trust: A Sociological Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Tănase, Stelian. 2004. Zei şi semizei. La început de secol. Bucureşti: Curtea Veche.
Tismăneanu, Vladimir. 1998. Fantasies of Salvation: Democracy, Nationalism, and
Myth in Post-Communist Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Tismăneanu, Vladimir, and Gail Kligman. 2001. “Romania’s First Postcommunist
Decade: From Iliescu to Iliescu.” East European Constitutional Review. 10 (1): 78-
83.
Toka, Gabor. 1995. “Political Support in East-Central Europe.” Pp. 354-382 in Citizens
and the State, edited by Hans-Dieter Klingemann and Dieter Fuchs. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Tufiş, Claudiu. 2008a. “Comrades of Citizens? Support for Democracy and Market
Economy.” Pp. 31-62 in The Values of Romanians, Î993-2006, edited by Bogdan
Voicu and Mălina Voicu. Iaşi: Institutul European.
Tufiş, Claudiu. 2008b. “Institutional Trust — Victim of the Postcommunist Transition.”
Pp. 115-143 in The Values of Romanians, 1993-2006, edited by Bogdan Voicu and
Mălina Voicu. Iaşi: Institutul European.
Tufiş, Claudiu. 2008c. “Multiple imputation as a solution to the missing data problem in
social sciences.” Revista Calitatea Vieţii. 19 (1-2): 199-212.
Tufiş, Claudiu. 2010a. “Dividing the pie: support for the free market and state
interventionism models of market economy.” Pp. 71-105 in Mapping Value
Orientations in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by Loek Haiman and Malina
Voicu. Leiden: Brill.
Tufiş, Claudiu. 2010b. “Tinerii români şi sistemul politic: a fi sau a nu fi cetăţean.” Pp.
9-31 in Gabriel Bădescu et al9 Implicarea civică şi politică a tinerilor. Constanţa:
Editura Dobrogea.
332
References
United Nations Development Programme. 2002. A Decade Later: Understanding the
Transition Process in Romania. National Human Development Report Romania
2001-2002. Bucharest: UNDP.
United Nations Development Programme. 2007. Making EU Accession Work for All:
Fostering Human Development by Strengthening the Inclusiveness of the Labor
Market in Romania. National Human Development Report Romania 2007.
Bucharest: UNDP.
Uslaner, Eric, and Gabriel Bàdescu. 2003. “Legacies and Conflicts: The Challenges to
Social Capital in the Democratic Transition.” Pp. 219-232 in Social Capital and the
Transition to Democracy, edited by Gabriel Bàdescu and Eric Uslaner. New York:
Routledge.
Valenzuela, Samuel. 1992. “Democratic Consolidation in Post-Transitional Settings:
Notion, Process, and Facilitating Conditions.” Pp. 57-104 in Issues in Democratic
Consolidation: The New South American Democracies in Comparative Perspective,
edited by Scott Mainwaring, Guillermo O’Donnell, and Samuel Valenzuela. Notre
Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
van Deth, Jan. 1990. “Interest in Politics.” Pp. 275-312 in Continuities in Political
Action. A Longitudinal Study of Political Orientations in Three Western
Democracies, edited by Kent Jennings and Jan van Deth. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Van Frausum, Yves, Gehmann, Ulrich, and Jürgen Gross. 1994. “Market Economy and
Economic Reform in Romania: Macroeconomic and Microeconomic Perspectives.”
Europe-Asia Studies. 46 (5): 735-756.
Verba, Sidney. 1965a. “Comparative Political Culture.” In Political Culture and
Political Development, edited by Lucian Pye and Sidney Verba. Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
Verba, Sidney. 1965b. “Germany: The Remaking of Political Culture.” In Political
Culture and Political Development, edited by Lucian Pye and Sidney Verba.
Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Verdery, Katherine. 1996. What Was Socialism, And What Comes Next? Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
Verdery, Katherine. 2003. The Vanishing Hectare: Property and Value in Postsocialist
Transylvania. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Vitányi, Iván. 1999. “Issues and Experiences in the Practice of Democratization:
Models and Paradigms.” Pp. 185-194 in The Democratic Process and the Market:
Challenges of the Transition, edited by Mihály Simái. New York: United Nations
University Press.
Waldron-Moore, Pamela. 1999. “Eastern Europe at the Crossroads of Democratic
Transition: Evaluating Support for Democratic Institutions, Satisfaction with
Democratic Government, and Consolidation of Democratic Regimes”. Comparative
Political Studies. 32 (1): 32-62.
Weil, Frederick. 1993. “The Development of Democratic Attitudes in Eastern and
Western Germany in a Comparative Perspective.” Pp. 195-225 in Research on
Democracy and Society. Volume I: Democratization in Eastern and Western
Europe, edited by Frederick Weil. Greenwich: JAI Press Inc.
333
LEARNING DEMOCRACY AND MARKET ECONOMY IN POST-COMMUNIST ROMANIA
Weingast, Barry. 1997a. “Democratic stability as a self-enforcing equilibrium.” Pp. 11-
46 in Understanding Democracy: Economic and Political Perspectives, edited by
Albert Breton et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weingast, Barry R. 1997b. “The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of
Law.” The American Political Science Review. 91 (2): 245-263.
Welzel, Christian, Inglehart, Ronald, and Franziska Deutsch. 2005. “Social Capital,
Voluntary Associations and Collective Action: Which Aspects of Social Capital
Have the Greatest ‘Civic’ Payoff?” Journal of Civil Society. 1 (2): 121-146.
White, Stephen. 1979. Political Culture and Soviet Politics. New York: St. Martin’s
Press.
White, Stephen. 1984. “Political Culture in Communist States: Some Problems of
Theory and Method.” Comparative Politics. 16 (3): 351-365.
White, Stephen, Gill, Graeme, and Darrell Slider. 1993. The Politics of Transition:
Shaping a Post-Soviet Future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Whitefield, Stephen. 2002. “Political Cleavages and Post-Communist Politics.” Annual
Review of Political Science. 5:181 -200.
Whitefield, Stephen, and Geoffrey Evans. 1994. “The Russian Election of 1993: Public
Opinion and the Transition Experience.” Post-Soviet Affairs. 10 (1): 38-60.
Whitefield, Stephen, and Geoffrey Evans. 1999. “Political Culture versus Rational
Choice: Explaining Responses to Transition in the Czech Republic and Slovakia.”
British Journal of Political Science. 29 (1): 129-154.
Williamson, John. 1990. “What Washington Means by Policy Reform.” In Latin
American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened? edited by John Williamson.
Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
Williamson, John. 2000. “What Should the World Bank Think about the Washington
Consensus?” The World Bank Research Observer. 15 (2): 251-264.
World Bank. 2000. Anticorruption in transition: A Contribution to the Policy Debate.
Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Bank. N.d. World Development Indicators Online. Available online at
http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators
***. 2005. Special Eurobarometer 225: Social Values, Science, and Technology.
Available online at http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_225_
report_en.pdf
***. 2007. Eurobarometer 65: Public Opinion in the European Union. Available online
at http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb65/eb65_en.htm
334
Abstract
This study starts from the assumption that an important requirement for
the success of democratic consolidation in post-communist countries is that
citizens accept the two defining dimensions of the new regime, democracy and
market economy, and the values associated with these. Since these are main
components of the political culture, a series of important questions arise: How
does political culture change? Is there a single political culture, or are there
different patterns of political culture? How do these patterns evolve over time?
How can these patterns and their evolution be explained? In my research I
analyze these issues by studying the Romanian political culture from the
beginning of the transition to the moment Romania became a member of the
European Union. To answer these questions I use seventeen years (from 1990 to
2006) of data which will allow me to identify the different patterns of political
culture in Romania and to explain their evolution over time.
The study contributes to the literature in several ways. First, while
previous studies have focused either on a single country and a single point in
time or on a group of countries and a single point in time, this study analyzes
political culture change over a long period of time. The results of such an
endeavor add a temporal dimension, which was not addressed in previous
studies, to our understanding of political culture in post-communist countries.
Second, while most of the existing literature studied political culture in
post-communist countries during the initial stage of the transition process (there
are only a few studies that go beyond 1995), this project analyzes political
culture change during the whole process of transition to democracy and market
economy. The findings will indicate whether the relationships among different
components of political culture identified in previous studies continue to hold,
or whether they were context-specific, depending on a particular stage during
the transition.
Finally, the study of Romanian political culture by itself is a minor
contribution to the literature. In the field of post-communist transitions Romania
is an understudied country, scholars focusing rather on the successful countries
of the region (i.e. the Czech Republic, Hungary, or Poland) or on countries
considered important from a policy perspective (Russia, the Former Soviet
Union). Since Romania may be considered a representative case for the group
of countries that had a late and troublesome transition (i.e. Bulgaria, Romania,
335
LEARNING DEMOCRACY AND MARKET ECONOMY IN POST-COMMUNIST ROMANIA
and Ukraine) the project will fill a gap in our knowledge about troubled
transitions and about the region.
By focusing on the attitudes of the citizens, this study aims at
recognizing the important role society has in transitions to democracy and
addresses “the missing agenda” (Clark 2002) in the post-communist transitions
literature.
Keywords: political culture, democratization, transition, post-communism, Romania
336
Résumé
L’étude ci-présente a comme point de départ la présupposition qu’une
des plus importantes conditions pour la réussite de la consolidation de la
démocratie dans les anciens pays communistes est que les citoyens acceptent les
deux dimensions qui définissent le nouveau régime: la démocratie et l’économie
de marché, les valeurs qui leur sont associées de même. Comme celles-ci sont
les principales composantes de la culture politique, les suivantes questions
extrêmement importantes s’imposent: Comment la culture politique change-t-
elle? Y a-t-il une culture politique nationale, ou devrait-on discuter plutôt de
différents modèles de la culture politique? Comment ces modèles évoluent-ils?
Comment ces tendances s’expliquent-elles? Dans l’étude ci-présente j’approche
tous ces problèmes, en analysant la culture politique roumaine dès le début de la
transition jusqu’au moment où la Roumanie a été acceptée dans l’Union
Européenne. Pour répondre à toutes ces questions j’utilise des bases de données
couvrant une période de dix-sept années qui me permettent d’identifier de
différents modèles de culture politique en Roumanie et d’expliquer leur
évolution à travers le temps.
La présente étude contribue aux débats sur de multiples dimensions
dans la littérature de spécialité. Tout d’abord, si les études antérieures ont
examiné un pays ou un groupe de pays à un seul moment donné dans leur
évolution, la présente recherche examine le changement de la culture politique
pendant une période de temps significative. C’est la dimension temporelle qui
manquait aux études précédentes qu’une telle approche ajoute à notre manière
de compréhension de la culture politique dans les anciens pays communistes.
Deuxièmement, si les études antérieures ont analysé la culture politique des
anciens pays communistes dans l’étape initiale de la transition (trop peu
d'études analysent des données plus récentes de 1995), j'analyse dans ce projet
de recherche, le changement de la culture politique à travers le processus de
transition vers la démocratie et l’économie de marché vu dans son intégralité.
Les résultats de ces analyses révéleront soit que les relations entre les
différentes composantes de la culture politique qui ont été identifiées dans les
études précédentes se confirment de même à la fin de la transition, soit qu’elles
aient été dépendantes du contexte, caractérisant seulement certaines étapes de la
transition. Enfin, mais pas le moindre, l’analyse de la culture politique roumaine
est en soi-même une contribution à la littérature de spécialité. Dans le domaine
de la transition des anciens pays communistes, la Roumanie est un pays
337
LEARNING DEMOCRACY AND MARKET ECONOMY IN POST-COMMUNIST ROMANIA
rarement étudié, les analystes se concentrant plutôt sur les histoires de réussite
de la région (la Tchéquie, la Pologne ou la Hongrie) ou sur les pays considérés
du point de vue stratégique comme plus importants (la Russie, les anciennes
républiques soviétiques). Mais la Roumanie peut être considérée un cas
représentatif dans le groupe des pays caractérisés par une transition retardée et
problématique (la Bulgarie, la Roumanie, F Ukraine), ainsi que cette étude
contribue à une meilleure compréhension des transitions difficiles en l'Europe
centrale et l’Europe de l’Est.
Mettant en évidence les attitudes des citoyens, ce volume vise à
démontrer le rôle important que la société joue dans les transitions
démocratiques. Ce sont la remarque de Clark (2002) concernant le thème absent
des études centrées sur les transitions post-communistes et son conseil de
l’étudier qui se trouvent à son origine.
Mots clés: culture politique, démocratisation, transition, post-communisme, la
Roumanie
338
Rezumat
Studiul de faţă porneşte de la prezumţia că una dintre cele mai
importante condiţii pentru succesul consolidării democraţiei în fostele ţări
comuniste este ca cetăţenii să accepte cele două dimensiuni definitorii ale
noului regim, democraţia şi economia de piaţă, şi valorile asociate cu acestea.
Dat fiind că acestea sunt principalele componente ale culturii politice,
următoarele întrebări devin extrem de importante: Cum se schimbă cultura
politică? Există o singură cultură politică naţională sau ar trebui, mai degrabă,
să se discute despre diferite modele de cultură politică? Cum evoluează aceste
modele în timp? Cum pot fî explicate aceste modele? Abordez, în acest studiu,
toate aceste probleme, analizând cultura politică românească de la începutul
tranziţiei până în momentul în care România a fost acceptată în Uniunea
Europeană. Pentru a oferi răspunsuri acestor întrebări folosesc baze de date care
acoperă o perioadă de timp de şaptesprezece ani şi care îmi permit identificarea
diferitelor modele de cultură politică din România şi explicarea evoluţiei
acestora de-a lungul timpului.
Studiul contribuie la discuţia din literatura de specialitate pe multiple
dimensiuni. în primul rând, dacă studiile anterioare au analizat o ţară sau un
grup de ţări la un singur moment în timp, cercetarea de faţă analizează
schimbarea culturii politice de-a lungul unei însemnate perioade de timp. O
astfel de abordare adaugă dimensiunea temporală, care lipsea studiilor
anterioare, modului în care înţelegem cultura politică în fostele ţări comuniste.
în al doilea rând, dacă studiile anterioare au analizat cultura politică în
fostele ţări comuniste în etapa iniţială a procesului de tranziţie (doar puţine
studii analizează date mai noi de 1995), eu analizez, în acest proiect, schimbarea
culturii politice de-a lungul întregului proces de tranziţie la democraţie şi la
economia de piaţă. Rezultatele acestor analize vor arăta dacă relaţiile dintre
diferite componente ale culturii politice care au fost identificate în studiile
anterioare se confirmă şi la sfârşitul tranziţiei sau dacă ele au fost dependente de
context, caracterizând doar anumite etape ale procesului de tranziţie.
Nu în ultimul rând, analiza culturii politice româneşti este, prin ea
însăşi, o contribuţie la literatura de specialitate. în aria tranziţiilor din fostele ţări
comuniste România este o ţară rar studiată, analiştii aplecându-se, mai degrabă,
asupra poveştilor de succes din regiune (Cehia, Polonia sau Ungaria) sau asupra
unor ţări considerate ca fiind mai importante din punct de vedere strategic
(Rusia, fostele republici sovietice). România poate fi considerată, însă, un caz
339
LEARNING DEMOCRACY AND MARKET ECONOMY IN POST-COMMUNIST ROMANIA
reprezentativ pentru grupul ţărilor cu o tranziţie întârziată şi problematică
(Bulgaria, România, Ucraina), astfel încât studiul de faţă contribuie la mai buna
înţelegere a tranziţiilor dificile din Centrul şi Estul Europei.
Punând accentul pe atitudinile cetăţenilor, acest volum încearcă să
demonstreze rolul important pe care societatea îl are în tranziţiile democratice şi
adresează direct ceea ce Clark (2002) numea tema absentă a studiilor din aria
tranziţiilor post-comuniste
Cuvinte-cheie: cultură politică, democratizare, tranziţie, postcomunism, România
Ba/erische
Staat^bibliothek
Menchen
340 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Tufiş, Claudiu D. |
| author_GND | (DE-588)140615652 (DE-588)1187260282 |
| author_facet | Tufiş, Claudiu D. |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Tufiş, Claudiu D. |
| author_variant | c d t cd cdt |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV041390305 |
| classification_rvk | MG 94086 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)862854263 (DE-599)BVBBV041390305 |
| discipline | Politologie |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV041390305</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240715</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">131030s2012 |||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789736118920</subfield><subfield code="9">978-973-611-892-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)862854263</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV041390305</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MG 94086</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)122874:12049</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tufiş, Claudiu D.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)140615652</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Learning democracy and market economy in post-communist Romania</subfield><subfield code="c">Claudiu D. Tufiş ; foreword by Bogdan Voicu</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Iaşi</subfield><subfield code="b">Institutul European</subfield><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">340 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="b">Diagramme, Karten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Colecţia Academica : Seria Ştiinţe politice</subfield><subfield code="v">163</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zusammenfassung englisch, französisch und rumänisch</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Politische Kultur</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4046540-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Demokratisierung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4124941-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Politischer Wandel</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4175047-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Marktwirtschaft</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4037653-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rumänien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4050939-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rumänien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4050939-4</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Politischer Wandel</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4175047-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Demokratisierung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4124941-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Marktwirtschaft</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4037653-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Politische Kultur</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4046540-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="C">b</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Voicu, Bogdan</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1187260282</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Colecţia Academica</subfield><subfield code="v">Seria Ştiinţe politice ; 163</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV035808626</subfield><subfield code="9">163</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Regensburg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=026838098&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=026838098&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Literaturverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=026838098&sequence=000004&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">909</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09049</subfield><subfield code="g">498</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">909</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090511</subfield><subfield code="g">498</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">330.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090511</subfield><subfield code="g">498</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">330.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09049</subfield><subfield code="g">498</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-026838098</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Rumänien (DE-588)4050939-4 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Rumänien |
| id | DE-604.BV041390305 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-20T08:33:22Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9789736118920 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-026838098 |
| oclc_num | 862854263 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-12 |
| physical | 340 Seiten Diagramme, Karten |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| publishDateSearch | 2012 |
| publishDateSort | 2012 |
| publisher | Institutul European |
| record_format | marc |
| series | Colecţia Academica |
| series2 | Colecţia Academica : Seria Ştiinţe politice |
| spelling | Tufiş, Claudiu D. Verfasser (DE-588)140615652 aut Learning democracy and market economy in post-communist Romania Claudiu D. Tufiş ; foreword by Bogdan Voicu Iaşi Institutul European 2012 340 Seiten Diagramme, Karten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Colecţia Academica : Seria Ştiinţe politice 163 Zusammenfassung englisch, französisch und rumänisch Politische Kultur (DE-588)4046540-8 gnd rswk-swf Demokratisierung (DE-588)4124941-0 gnd rswk-swf Politischer Wandel (DE-588)4175047-0 gnd rswk-swf Marktwirtschaft (DE-588)4037653-9 gnd rswk-swf Rumänien (DE-588)4050939-4 gnd rswk-swf Rumänien (DE-588)4050939-4 g Politischer Wandel (DE-588)4175047-0 s Demokratisierung (DE-588)4124941-0 s Marktwirtschaft (DE-588)4037653-9 s Politische Kultur (DE-588)4046540-8 s b DE-604 Voicu, Bogdan Sonstige (DE-588)1187260282 oth Colecţia Academica Seria Ştiinţe politice ; 163 (DE-604)BV035808626 163 Digitalisierung UB Regensburg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=026838098&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=026838098&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Literaturverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=026838098&sequence=000004&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Abstract |
| spellingShingle | Tufiş, Claudiu D. Learning democracy and market economy in post-communist Romania Colecţia Academica Politische Kultur (DE-588)4046540-8 gnd Demokratisierung (DE-588)4124941-0 gnd Politischer Wandel (DE-588)4175047-0 gnd Marktwirtschaft (DE-588)4037653-9 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4046540-8 (DE-588)4124941-0 (DE-588)4175047-0 (DE-588)4037653-9 (DE-588)4050939-4 |
| title | Learning democracy and market economy in post-communist Romania |
| title_auth | Learning democracy and market economy in post-communist Romania |
| title_exact_search | Learning democracy and market economy in post-communist Romania |
| title_full | Learning democracy and market economy in post-communist Romania Claudiu D. Tufiş ; foreword by Bogdan Voicu |
| title_fullStr | Learning democracy and market economy in post-communist Romania Claudiu D. Tufiş ; foreword by Bogdan Voicu |
| title_full_unstemmed | Learning democracy and market economy in post-communist Romania Claudiu D. Tufiş ; foreword by Bogdan Voicu |
| title_short | Learning democracy and market economy in post-communist Romania |
| title_sort | learning democracy and market economy in post communist romania |
| topic | Politische Kultur (DE-588)4046540-8 gnd Demokratisierung (DE-588)4124941-0 gnd Politischer Wandel (DE-588)4175047-0 gnd Marktwirtschaft (DE-588)4037653-9 gnd |
| topic_facet | Politische Kultur Demokratisierung Politischer Wandel Marktwirtschaft Rumänien |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=026838098&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=026838098&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=026838098&sequence=000004&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV035808626 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT tufisclaudiud learningdemocracyandmarketeconomyinpostcommunistromania AT voicubogdan learningdemocracyandmarketeconomyinpostcommunistromania |