Antitrust law: an analysis of antitrust principles and their application 1A 218 - 248
Gespeichert in:
| Format: | Buch |
|---|---|
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Boston [u.a.]
Little, Brown & Comp.
2013
|
| Ausgabe: | 4. ed |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | XVIII, 459 S. |
| ISBN: | 9781454825890 9780735564282 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cc4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV041295909 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20201008 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 130930s2013 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781454825890 |9 978-1-4548-2589-0 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780735564282 |9 978-0-7355-6428-2 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)864558393 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV041295909 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-M382 |a DE-20 |a DE-19 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a KF1649 | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Antitrust law |b an analysis of antitrust principles and their application |n 1A |p 218 - 248 |c Phillip Areeda ; Herbert Hovenkamp ; Donald F. Turner |
| 250 | |a 4. ed | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Boston [u.a.] |b Little, Brown & Comp. |c 2013 | |
| 300 | |a XVIII, 459 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Antitrust law |z United States | |
| 651 | 4 | |a USA | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Areeda, Phillip |d 1930- |e Sonstige |0 (DE-588)170001814 |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hovenkamp, Herbert |d 1948- |e Sonstige |0 (DE-588)132809168 |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Turner, Donald F. |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |w (DE-604)BV021463788 |g 1A |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m SWB Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=026744798&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-026744798 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804151362559148032 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | CONTENTS
2B-2. AREAS OF FEDERALLY CREATED EXPRESS PRIMACY
FOR STATE LAW 3
218. EXPRESS FEDERAL DEFERENCE GENERALLY 3
219. FEDERAL ANTITRUST IMMUNITY FOR THE BUSINESS OF
INSURANCE 4
A. INTRODUCTION 4
B. THE BUSINESS OF INSURANCE 6
1. GENERALLY; INSURER AGREEMENTS WITH
PROVIDERS OF GOODS OR SERVICES 6
2. PEER REVIEW 12
3. NON-PHYSICIAN LIMITATIONS 14
4. THE BUSINESS OF INSURANCE GENERALLY
EMBRACES COLLECTIVE DECISIONS
CONCERNING SCOPE OF POLICY;
COMPLEMENTARY SERVICES 15
5. INSURER AGREEMENTS WITH AGENCIES AND
AGENTS 21
6. HORIZONTAL AGREEMENTS 22
C. REGULATED BY STATE LAW * INSURANCE
IMMUNITY AND PARKER IMMUNITY COMPARED,
FEDERAL STATUTES EXPLICITLY REGULATING
INSURANCE 26
D. LIMITS ON EXTRATERRITORIAL APPLICATION 32
E. IMPLICATIONS OF POSSIBLE MCCARRAN-
FERGUSON ACT REPEAL 33
220. INSURANCE IMMUNITY: BOYCOTT EXCEPTION 35
A. CONCERTED ACTION 36
B. MEANING OF BOYCOTT 36
2B-3. IMPLIED ANTITRUST IMMUNITY FOR STATE ACTION 46
221. INTRODUCTION: THE MEANING OF PARKER V.
BROWN 46
A. OVERVIEW 46
B. PARKER 49
C. SCOPE OF ORIGINAL PARKER IMMUNITY 52
IX
CONTENTS
D. SCOPE OF PARKER IMMUNITY: DEVELOPMENT OF
AUTHORIZATION REQUIREMENT 54
1. MEANING AND NECESSITY OF AUTHORIZATION
REQUIREMENT 54
2. PRE-MIDCAL DECISIONS DEVELOPING
AUTHORIZATION REQUIREMENT 57
3. DETERMINING INTENT: MEANING OF
PARTICIPATION OR APPROVAL 60
4. APPROVAL BY SUBORDINATE STATE
AGENCIES 60
5. AGENCY INACTION 64
6. SCOPE OF AGENCY AUTHORITY; TWO-LEVEL
INTENT INQUIRY 64
7. AGENCY INVOLVED IN PROPRIETARY
ACTIVITY 65
8. CLEAR STATEMENT REQUIRED 66
E. SCOPE OF PARKER IMMUNITY: DEVELOPMENT OF
ACTIVE SUPERVISION REQUIREMENT 67
1. INTRODUCTION 67
2. DECISION BY DISINTERESTED GOVERNMENT
OFFICIAL 69
3. BIAS AND INATTENTIVENESS 69
4. SELF-EXECUTING STATUTES; CONDUCT NOT
REQUIRING SUPERVISION 70
5. WHOSE INITIATIVE? 71
6. AGENCY INACTION; PRESUMPTION AGAINST
ADEQUACY OF SUPERVISION 72
F. MIDCAL DECISION RESTATES PARKER
REQUIREMENTS 73
G. LIMITATIONS ON PARKER: EXTRATERRITORIAL EFFECTS
AND OTHER SPILLOVERS 74
222. SCOPE OF PARKER IMMUNITY OUTLINED; SUMMARY
DISPOSITION OF PARKER CLAIMS 76
A. PARKER OUTLINED 76
B. SUMMARY DISPOSITION OF CLAIMS IMPLICATING
PARKER 82
223. ANTITRUST LIABILITY FOR GOVERNMENTAL
SUBDIVISIONS; CORRECTIVE LEGISLATION 83
A. INTRODUCTION 83
B. LAFAYETTE 85
C. HOME RULE MUNICIPALITIES; BOULDER 88
D. LOCAL GOVERNMENT ANTITRUST ACT 93
__ CONTENTS
224. STATE AUTHORIZATION TO DISPLACE ANTITRUST
LAW 98
A. INTRODUCTION 98
B. DISTINGUISHING STATE ITSELF FROM
SUBORDINATE AGENCIES REQUIRING
AUTHORIZATION FROM ABOVE 104
1. BASIC PRINCIPLE 104
2. CONFLICTING JUDICIAL APPROACHES 105
C. AUTHORIZATION DOES NOT REQUIRE
COMPULSION 111
1. WEIGHTY POLICY CONSIDERATIONS DISFAVOR
COMPULSION REQUIREMENT 111
2. COMPULSION AS EVIDENCE OF STATE
PURPOSE OR SUPERVISION 116
3. COMPULSION NEITHER NECESSARY NOR
SUFFICIENT: HALLIE AND SOUTHERN
MOTOR 117
D. OFFICIAL ERRORS OR BAD FAITH IN CARRYING OUT
AUTHORIZED ACTIVITIES; CONSPIRACY 120
1. PROBLEM STATED 120
2. UNAUTHORIZED CONSPIRACY WITH
GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL 122
3. COLUMBIA DECISION REJECTS CONSPIRACY
CLAIMS 125
4. TREND TOWARD REFUSAL TO DENY IMMUNITY
TO ERRONEOUS OFFICIAL DECISIONS 131
5. DEFERRAL TO STATE ADMINISTRATIVE AND
APPELLATE REMEDIES 134
E. NON-AUTHORIZATION FOR PROPRIETARY
ACTIVITIES? 134
1. CONCLUSIONS STATED 134
2. SUBSTANTIVE ANTITRUST LAW DISPOSES OF
MOST CASES INVOLVING PROPRIETARY
ACTIVITIES 135
3. PROPERLY AUTHORIZED COMMERCIAL
ACTIVITIES IMMUNE 137
225. AMBIGUITIES IN AUTHORIZING PROVISION 139
A. INTRODUCTION; TWO MEANINGS OF
AUTHORIZATION 139
B. HOW PRECISE MUST THE STATE S
AUTHORIZATION BE? 145
1. HALLIE DECISION 148
XI
CONTENTS
2. SOUTHERN MOTOR DECISION 151
3. FORESEEABILITY OF ANTICOMPETITIVE
REGULATION 153
4. ORDINARY CORPORATE POWERS DO NOT
CONTEMPLATE ANTITRUST VIOLATION; PHOEBE
PUTNEY DECISION 160
5. OBJECTIVE FORESEEABILITY CONTEMPLATES
ECONOMIC REASONABLENESS 170
6. OBJECTIVE FORESEEABILITY: ACTIONS CONTRARY
TO STATE S OWN PUBLIC INTEREST 175
C. STATE JUDICIAL DECISION AS
AUTHORIZATION 176
1. STATE COURT DECISIONS INTERPRETING
AMBIGUOUS OR SILENT AUTHORIZING
STATUTE 176
2. STATE COURT DECISIONS AS CREATING
AUTHORIZATION 177
D. RETROACTIVE AUTHORIZATION 179
226. ACTIVE SUPERVISION REQUIREMENT: DOMAIN AND
NATURE 179
A. INTRODUCTION 179
B. MUNICIPALITIES AND THE GOVERNMENT S
PUBLIC AGENCIES REQUIRE NO
SUPERVISION 181
C. ADEQUACY OF SUPERVISION: THE PATRICK AND
TICOR DECISIONS 183
1. PATRICK AND PEER REVIEW 183
2. OVERSIGHT BY STATE REGULATORY AGENCIES
AND BOARDS 188
D. WHO MUST SUPERVISE? 210
E. CONDUCT NOT REQUIRING SUPERVISION 211
227. THE NEED FOR SUPERVISION: IDENTIFYING AND
CLASSIFYING THE RELEVANT ACTOR 214
A. INTRODUCTION; PROBLEM STATED 214
B. RECOMMENDATIONS 226
228. NON-IMMUNITY BUT NO ANTITRUST VIOLATION OF
PENALTY; APPEALS OF PARKER IMMUNITY
DENIAL 227
A. INTRODUCTION 227
B. NO ANTITRUST VIOLATION 227
1. NO VIOLATION EVEN FOR PRIVATE
FIRM 227
XU
__ CONTENTS
2. REASONABLE GOVERNMENT
REGULATION 231
C. NON-IMMUNITY AND POSSIBLE VIOLATION, BUT
NO PUNITIVE SANCTION*GOVERNMENT
DEFENDANTS 232
1. GENERALLY 232
2. DAMAGES LIABILITY FOR STATE AGENCIES OR
EMPLOYEES 237
D. NON-IMMUNITY OF PRIVATE DEFENDANTS 239
1. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY 239
2. RELEVANT INTERESTS 241
3. REASONABLE RELIANCE; APPARENT
AUTHORITY 242
4. STATE COMPULSION REVISITED 244
E. INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL OF DISTRICT COURT DENIAL
OF PARKER IMMUNITY 245
229. RELATIONSHIP OF NOERR AND PARKER
IMMUNITIES 246
230. POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE CRITERIA FOR PARKER
IMMUNITY 254
A. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY 254
B. APPROACHES FOCUSING ON FAILURE IN
POLITICAL MARKETS; SPECIAL INTERESTS;
EXTRATERRITORIALITY 256
C. RULE OF REASON APPROACH 260
D. OBJECTIVE FORESEEABILITY TEST IMPLICATES
REASONABLENESS AND PUBLIC INTEREST 261
231. THE STATE ACTION DOCTRINE IN THE FEDERAL TRADE
COMMISSION 262
A. INTRODUCTION 262
B. GREATER PREEMPTIVE REACH OF FTC
ACT? 263
1. ARGUMENTS FAVORING GREATER PREEMPTIVE
REACH 263
2. ARGUMENTS FOR GIVING THE FTC ACT THE
SAME LIMITATIONS AS THE SHERMAN
ACT 265
C. RECENT CASE LAW REJECTS BROADER REACH 266
D. CONCLUSION; FTC FAVORS CLOSE SCRUTINY OF
STATE ACTION DEFENSES 267
XM
CONTENTS ___^_^_
2B-4. NON-ANTITRUST LIMITATIONS ON ANTICOMPETITIVE STATE
ACTIVITIES 269
232. MISCELLANEOUS FEDERAL LIMITATIONS 269
A. INTRODUCTION 269
B. THE FIRST AMENDMENT 270
C. THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT AND THE CIVIL
RIGHTS ACT 275
D. THE TAKINGS CLAUSE 277
E. 1996 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT 278
233. COMMERCE CLAUSE 280
A. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY 280
B. COMMERCE CLAUSE AND ANTICOMPETITIVE STATE
LAWS 282
C. SIGNIFICANT BURDENS ON INTERSTATE
COMMERCE 285
D. EXTENT OF LEGITIMATE STATE BENEFITS 289
E. ANTITRUST STATE ACTION DOCTRINE COMPARED
WITH COMMERCE CLAUSE AND OTHER
NON-ANTITRUST LIMITATIONS ON STATE
REGULATION 291
2C. ANTITRUST POLICY UNDER FEDERAL REGULATION AND
DEREGULATION 292
2C-1. FEDERAL REGULATION GENERALLY 292
240. FEDERAL REGULATION QUALIFIES ANTITRUST
MANDATE 292
A. INTRODUCTION 292
B. BASIC PRINCIPLE RESOLVING PARTICULAR
CASES 294
1. BASIC PRINCIPLE RECALLED 294
2. OVERSIGHT NEARLY ALWAYS
INCOMPLETE 294
C. BACKGROUND CONSIDERATIONS 296
1. VARIATIONS IN REGULATORY POWERS AND
PREMISES; PERVASIVENESS INADEQUATE
GROUND FOR DETERMINING ANTITRUST
IMMUNITY 298
2. COMPETITIVE POLICY WITHIN REGULATORY
FRAMEWORK 301
3. FLEXIBILITY IN ANTITRUST RULES 302
4. PROCEDURE IS SUBSTANCE 303
5. BROADER OR NARROWER IMMUNITY
XIV
CONTENTS
DEPENDING ON REQUESTED RELIEF? 304
6. NONDOCTRINAL INFLUENCES 305
D. IMPACT OF REGULATION ON ANTITRUST ANALYSIS OF
NON-IMMUNE CONDUCT 306
241. DEREGULATION REVISES AND EXPANDS ANTITRUST
MANDATE 310
A. INTRODUCTION 310
B. RATIONALES FOR DEREGULATION 312
1. TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE 312
2. PUBLIC CHOICE, REGULATORY CAPTURE, AND
OTHER CRITIQUES OF THE REGULATORY
PROCESS 313
3. REVISIONS IN ECONOMIC THEORY
PERMITTING BROADER VIEW OF COMPETITION;
CONTESTABILITY 319
C. ROLE OF ANTITRUST UNDER DEREGULATION 321
D. ROLE OF ANTITRUST SAVING CLAUSES IN
DEREGULATED MARKETS 323
242. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ANTITRUST AND FEDERAL
REGULATORY REGIME; GENERAL CONCLUSIONS
SUMMARIZED 328
A. EXPRESS STATUTORY IMMUNITY 328
B. IMPLIED IMMUNITY 329
C. DEFERRAL TO FEDERAL AGENCY APART FROM ANY
IMMUNITY 331
D. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FEDERAL ANTITRUST
IMMUNITIES AND REGULATORY IMMUNITIES
CREATED BY STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT 332
243. WHEN DOES REGULATION OUST FEDERAL ANTITRUST
AUTHORITY? 333
A. SUMMARY 333
1. MAIN DIVISION: EXPRESS AND IMPLIED
IMMUNITY 333
2. IMMUNITY IMPLIED FROM AGENCY
COMPULSION, APPROVAL, OR SILENT
ACQUIESCENCE? 334
B. EXPRESS IMMUNITY 336
1. GENERALLY 336
2. STATUTORY COMPULSION YIELDS EXPRESS
IMMUNITY 338
C. HETEROGENEITY OF IMPLIED IMMUNITY
CASES 338
XV
CONTENTS
D. IMMUNITY CREATED BY NATURE AND
INTENSITY OF AGENCY SCRUTINY OR BY
COMPREHENSIVENESS OF REGULATORY
SCHEME 339
E. NO IMPLIED IMMUNITY WITHOUT ADEQUATE
SUPERVISION OF PRIVATE CONDUCT; PERVASIVE
REGULATION GENERALLY INSUFFICIENT 360
1. INTRODUCTION: AMBIGUITIES IN AGENCY
APPROVAL 360
2. TRADITIONAL PERVASIVENESS
REQUIREMENT 360
3. MEANING OF REPUGNANCY AND
NECESSARY TO MAKE THE ACT WORK
FORMULATIONS 363
4. FEDERAL IMPLIED IMMUNITY STANDARD
ANALOGOUS TO PARKER STATE ACTION
STANDARD 373
F. ANTITRUST OUSTED BY (SOMETIMES
UNEXERCISED) AGENCY POWER TO CONTROL OR
PREVENT? 375
G. TRINKO: NON-IMMUNITY, BUT EFFECTIVE
REGULATORY REGIME MAKES ANTITRUST
SUPERFLUOUS 380
1. TRINKO SOFT IMMUNITY DEPENDS ON
INCREMENTAL BENEFIT OF ANTITRUST
INTERVENTION 386
2. ANTITRUST S ADDITIONAL BENEFIT TO
COMPETITION VARIES WITH NATURE OF
REGULATED MARKET AND DIFFICULTY OF
SUBSTANTIVE ANTITRUST CLAIM 389
3. EQUIVALENCE OF STATE AND FEDERAL
REGULATION 391
4. SUMMARY DISPOSITION UNDER TRINKO
APPROACH 392
5. RELATIONSHIP TO REMEDIES 392
244. JUDICIAL DEFERRAL TO AGENCY DECISION
MAKING 393
A. SUMMARY 394
B. ACTUAL AGENCY REVIEW AND APPROVAL 396
1. SCOPE OF APPROVAL GENERALLY 396
2. APPROVAL WITH CONTINUING
SUPERVISION 398
XVI
_^ CONTENTS
C. DEFERRAL TO AGENCY OF MATTERS WITHIN ITS
JURISDICTION 400
1. WHO SHOULD DECIDE? 401
2. CONDUCT NOT REFERRED TO AN AGENCY THAT
COULD HAVE IMMUNIZED IT 401
3. ACTIONS, MAINLY BY THE GOVERNMENT,
SEEKING INJUNCTION 401
4. AVAILABILITY OF DAMAGES OR CRIMINAL
SANCTIONS 404
5. SILENCE 407
D. DEFERENCE TO PRIMARY JURISDICTION OF
FEDERAL AGENCY 408
1. SUMMARY 408
2. RICCI CASE 412
3. SCOPE AND OPERATION OF PRIMARY
JURISDICTION 414
4. EXHAUSTION DISTINGUISHED 419
E. NATURE AND EXTENT OF AGENCY CONSIDERATION;
LIMITATIONS ON JURISDICTION 419
F. CONDUCT OUTSIDE EXPLICIT EXEMPTION 422
G. TOLLING OF LIMITATION STATUTE PENDING AGENCY
CONSIDERATION 423
245. ANTITRUST DEFERENCE TO NONFEDERAL TRIBUNAL OR
DECISION MAKER 425
A. INTRODUCTION 425
B. REQUIRED PURSUIT OF ALTERNATIVE STATE
REMEDIES 426
C. PRIMARY JURISDICTION OF STATE
AGENCIES 429
D. DEFERENCE TO PRIVATE GROUP S INTERNAL
REMEDIES 432
246. GOOD FAITH REGULATORY COMPLIANCE AS DEFENSE
TO NON-IMMUNE CONDUCT 435
A. GENERALLY 435
B. RELEVANCE OF INTENT; OBJECTIVE INQUIRY
GENERALLY PREFERRED 436
247. THE FILED RATE DOCTRINE AND ITS
LIMITATIONS 440
A. INTRODUCTION; KEOGH AND SQUARE D 440
B. APPLICATION UNDER PARTIAL
DEREGULATION 446
C. COMPETITOR SUITS 449
XVII
CONTENTS
D. KEOGH AND EQUITY RELIEF 452
E. RATES FILED WITH STATE REGULATORS 454
F. KEOGH AS LIMITATION ON STATE ANTITRUST
LAW 456
248. NOERR, PARKER, AND FEDERAL REGULATORY IMMUNITIES
COMPARED 456
XVUI
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author_GND | (DE-588)170001814 (DE-588)132809168 |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV041295909 |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | KF1649 |
| callnumber-raw | KF1649 |
| callnumber-search | KF1649 |
| callnumber-sort | KF 41649 |
| callnumber-subject | KF - United States |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)864558393 (DE-599)BVBBV041295909 |
| edition | 4. ed |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01413nam a2200361 cc4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV041295909</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20201008 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">130930s2013 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781454825890</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-4548-2589-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780735564282</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-7355-6428-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)864558393</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV041295909</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KF1649</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Antitrust law</subfield><subfield code="b">an analysis of antitrust principles and their application</subfield><subfield code="n">1A</subfield><subfield code="p">218 - 248</subfield><subfield code="c">Phillip Areeda ; Herbert Hovenkamp ; Donald F. Turner</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">4. ed</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Boston [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Little, Brown & Comp.</subfield><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XVIII, 459 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Antitrust law</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Areeda, Phillip</subfield><subfield code="d">1930-</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)170001814</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hovenkamp, Herbert</subfield><subfield code="d">1948-</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)132809168</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Turner, Donald F.</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV021463788</subfield><subfield code="g">1A</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">SWB Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=026744798&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-026744798</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | USA |
| geographic_facet | USA |
| id | DE-604.BV041295909 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T00:53:37Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781454825890 9780735564282 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-026744798 |
| oclc_num | 864558393 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-M382 DE-20 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| owner_facet | DE-M382 DE-20 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| physical | XVIII, 459 S. |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| publishDateSearch | 2013 |
| publishDateSort | 2013 |
| publisher | Little, Brown & Comp. |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Antitrust law an analysis of antitrust principles and their application 1A 218 - 248 Phillip Areeda ; Herbert Hovenkamp ; Donald F. Turner 4. ed Boston [u.a.] Little, Brown & Comp. 2013 XVIII, 459 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Antitrust law United States USA Areeda, Phillip 1930- Sonstige (DE-588)170001814 oth Hovenkamp, Herbert 1948- Sonstige (DE-588)132809168 oth Turner, Donald F. Sonstige oth (DE-604)BV021463788 1A SWB Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=026744798&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Antitrust law an analysis of antitrust principles and their application Antitrust law United States |
| title | Antitrust law an analysis of antitrust principles and their application |
| title_auth | Antitrust law an analysis of antitrust principles and their application |
| title_exact_search | Antitrust law an analysis of antitrust principles and their application |
| title_full | Antitrust law an analysis of antitrust principles and their application 1A 218 - 248 Phillip Areeda ; Herbert Hovenkamp ; Donald F. Turner |
| title_fullStr | Antitrust law an analysis of antitrust principles and their application 1A 218 - 248 Phillip Areeda ; Herbert Hovenkamp ; Donald F. Turner |
| title_full_unstemmed | Antitrust law an analysis of antitrust principles and their application 1A 218 - 248 Phillip Areeda ; Herbert Hovenkamp ; Donald F. Turner |
| title_short | Antitrust law |
| title_sort | antitrust law an analysis of antitrust principles and their application 218 248 |
| title_sub | an analysis of antitrust principles and their application |
| topic | Antitrust law United States |
| topic_facet | Antitrust law United States USA |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=026744798&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV021463788 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT areedaphillip antitrustlawananalysisofantitrustprinciplesandtheirapplication1a AT hovenkampherbert antitrustlawananalysisofantitrustprinciplesandtheirapplication1a AT turnerdonaldf antitrustlawananalysisofantitrustprinciplesandtheirapplication1a |