Comparative reasoning in European Supreme Courts:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Oxford
Oxford Univ. Press
2013
|
| Ausgabe: | 1. ed. |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Klappentext |
| Beschreibung: | VIII, 310 S. |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV041281613 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20140508 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 130920s2013 xx |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |z 9780199680382 |c hardback |9 978-0-19-968038-2 | ||
| 020 | |z 0199680388 |c hardback |9 0-19-968038-8 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)847020016 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV041281613 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-19 |a DE-188 |a DE-739 |a DE-29 |a DE-384 |a DE-11 | ||
| 084 | |a PS 2960 |0 (DE-625)139745: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Bobek, Michal |d 1977- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)140250077 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparative reasoning in European Supreme Courts |c Michal Bobek |
| 250 | |a 1. ed. | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Oxford |b Oxford Univ. Press |c 2013 | |
| 300 | |a VIII, 310 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsvergleich |0 (DE-588)4115712-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Entscheidungsfindung |0 (DE-588)4113446-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Oberster Gerichtshof |0 (DE-588)4172291-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Mitgliedsstaaten |0 (DE-588)4170174-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Mitgliedsstaaten |0 (DE-588)4170174-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Oberster Gerichtshof |0 (DE-588)4172291-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Entscheidungsfindung |0 (DE-588)4113446-1 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a Rechtsvergleich |0 (DE-588)4115712-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m SWB Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=026255038&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Passau - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=026255038&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Klappentext |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |f 090511 |g 4373 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |f 090511 |g 4371 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |f 090512 |g 4 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |f 090511 |g 4 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |f 090512 |g 4373 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |f 090512 |g 4371 |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-026255038 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1820137348324655104 |
|---|---|
| adam_text |
CONTENTS
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS IX
INTRODUCTION 1
1. THE TOPIC ]
2. THE APPROACH 2
3. THE STRUCTURE 4
4. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 5
PART I. THE FRAMEWORK
1. THE DEBATE ON COMPARATIVE REASONING BY COURTS 9
1. A HISTORICAL VIEW 9
1.1 A NOVELTY. 9
1.2 . RISING IN QUANTITATIVE TERMS 14
2. THE CONTEXT OF THE CURRENT DEBATES 16
2. FOREIGN LAW IN COURTS: A TYPOLOGY 19
1. MANDATORY USES OF FOREIGN LAW 21
1.1 PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW (CONFLICT OF LAWS) 22
1.2 MUTUAL RECOGNITION, EXTRADITION, AND OTHER COMPULSORY
CONSIDERATIONS OF FOREIGN LAW 22
1.3 DIRECDY APPLICABLE SOURCES OF PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW 23
1.4 LAW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION 25
1.5 LAW OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS 27
2. ADVISABLE USES OF FOREIGN LAW 28
2.1 REFERENCE TO A PARENT INTERNATIONAL LAW (AND TO EU LAW
BEFORE ACCESSION) 28
2.2 LAWS SHARED WITH OR TAKEN FROM OTHER STATES 29
2.3 GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF LAW 30
2.4 INTRA-FEDERAL REFERENCES 31
3. VOLUNTARY USES OF FOREIGN LAW 33
4. NON-MANDATORY USES OF FOREIGN LAW AND LEGAL COMPARISONS 34
3. FACTORS INFLUENCING THE USE OF COMPARATIVE ARGUMENTS BY COURTS 36
1. INTRODUCTION: OF ABSTRACT MODELS AND CAUSALITY 36
2. GENERAL FACTORS 39
2.1 THE POLITICAL AND THE LEGAL 40
2.2 THE SIZE 41
2.3 THE AGE 42
3. INSTITUTIONAL FACTORS 44
3.1 LEVEL OF THE COURT IN THE JUDICIAL HIERARCHY 44
VI CONTENTS
3.2 ANALYTICAL BACK-UP 46
3.3 POINTS OF REFERENCE, NETWORKS, DATABASES 47
4. PROCEDURAL FACTORS 50
4.1 CASES SELECTION 50
4.2 ACTIVITY OF THE PARTIES 51
4.3 AMICUS CURIAE 52
4.4 COSTS OF LITIGATION 53
5. HUMAN FACTORS 54
6. COMPARISONS IN PRIVATE AND IN PUBLIC LAW 57
7. CONSTITUTIONAL ADJUDICATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS 60
PART II. THE PRACTICE
4. PROLOGUE: THE METHOD AND ITS PITFALLS 67
1. WHAT 67
2. HOW 69
3. POTENTIAL INACCURACIES 72
5. ENGLAND AND WALES 75
1. THE DOCTRINE 76
1.1 PRECEDENT 77
1.2 STATUTORY INTERPRETATION 78
1.3 AN AXIOMATICALLY OPEN SYSTEM 79
2. JUDICIAL VIEWS 80
2.1 THE JUDICIAL FORUM 80
2.2 EXTRA-JUDICIAL FORA 82
3. THE PRACTICE 84
3.1 THE COMMON LAW AND THE REST OF THE WORLD GAP 84
3.2 A GLANCE AT THE APPELLATE COMMITTEE OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS IN 2009 87
3.3 THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM 90
4. AN EVALUATION: A REAL CHANGE OR JUST A CHANGE IN TAXONOMY? 90
4.1 THE UNITY OF THE COMMON LAW*FROM APPEALS TO COORDINATION 90
4.2 WITH WHOM TO COMPARE? 93
4.3 THE VOLUNTARY COMMONWEALTH AND THE COMPULSORY EUROPE 95
6. FRANCE 97
1. A NOTE ON THE JUDICIAL STYLE 97
2. THE DOCTRINE 99
2.1 THE EXEGESIS 100
2.2 GENY AND THE LIBRE RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE 101
2.3 SALEILLES AND THE SEARCH FOR OBJECTIVE JUDICIAL COMPARISONS 103
2.4 THE MODERN ENTRY POINTS: DYNAMIC INTERPRETATION,
STANDARDS, AND GAPS 104
3. JUDICIAL VIEWS 106
4. THE PRACTICE 107
4.1 INDIRECT EVIDENCE OF COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS 108
4.2 CORNELLD'ETAT 111
CONTENTS VII
4.3 COUR DE CASSATION 113
4.4 CONSEIL CONSTITUTIONNEL 114
5. AN EVALUATION: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS AS A LIBERALIZING EXERCISE? 116
7. GERMANY 120
1. A NOTE ON THE STRUCTURE OF GERMAN FEDERAL JURISDICTIONS 120
2. THE DOCTRINE 122
2.1 THE COMPARATIVE LAW DEBATE 123
2.2 THE GENERAL RECHTSDOGMATIK 127
3. JUDICIAL VIEWS 135
3.1 THE JUDICIAL FORUM 136
3.2 EXTRA-JUDICIAL FORA 138
4. THE PRACTICE 139
4.1 BUNDESVERFASSUNGSGERICHT 140
4.2 BUNDESGERICHTSHOF 144
4.3 BUNDESVERWALTUNGSGERICHT 147
5. THE OVERALL PICTURE: THE PRE-EMINENCE OF SCHOLARLY COMPARISONS 148
8. CZECH REPUBLIC 152
1. THE DOCTRINE 152
2. JUDICIAL VIEWS 154
3. THE PRACTICE 157
3.1 USTAVNI SOUD 157
3.2 NEJVY'S'SISOUD 162
3.3 NEJVYSSI SPRDVNI SOUD 164
4. EXPLAINING THE GAPS 168
4.1 COMPARATIVE LAW WITHOUT A THEORY 168
4.2 JUDICIAL DIFFERENTIATION AND INSTITUTIONAL MENTALITY 172
9. SLOVAKIA 174
1. JUDICIAL VIEWS 175
2. THE PRACTICE 178
2.1 USTAVNY SIID 178
2.2 NAJVYSSI SLID 185
3. THE DIFFERENCE: COMMON HISTORY DOES NOT MEAN
THE SAME PRESENT 189
10. AN EMPIRICAL EPILOGUE: QUANTITY, QUALITY, AND BEYOND 192
1. THE QUANTITY 192
2. THE QUALITY 196
3. THE THEORIES 197
PART III. THE APPRAISAL
11. COMPARATIVE REASONING BY COURTS: THE THEORETICAL PLAYING FIELD 203
1. JUDICIAL IDEOLOGIES AND JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING 204
2. THE NEED FOR EXTRA-SYSTEMIC INSPIRATION 205
VIII CONTENTS
2.1 GAPS IN LAW 206
2.2 SOCIETAL CHANGE 208
3. JUDGES AS LEGISLATORS 210
4. THE (POSITIVISTIC) LIMITS OF COMPARATIVE REASONING BY COURTS 212
4.1 PERSUASIVE, NEVER BINDING 213
4.2 SUBSIDIARY, NEVER CONTROLLING 215
4.3 ADDITIONAL, NEVER FREE-STANDING 216
4.4 DEFENDABLE AND SELECTIVE, NOT EXHAUSTIVE 217
5. SUMMARY: OF OLD AND NEW HATS 217
12. ON AUTHORITY, CITATION, AND SILENCE 220
1. THE AUTHORITY AND ITS DISPLAY IN A JUDICIAL DECISION 220
1.1 THE TYPES OF AUTHORITY: THE RATIONAL AND THE RELIGIOUS 220
1.2 THE DISCOVERY AND ITS REPRESENTATION 222
1.3 THE STYLES OF THE REPRESENTATION 223
2. THE MEANING OF A LEGAL CITATION 225
3. TO READ AND/OR TO QUOTE? 227
4. THE ADVANTAGES OF SILENCE 230
4.1 THE INSTITUTIONAL AND THE SUBSTANTIVE LEGITIMACY 230
4.2 THE TRANSPARENCY TRAP 233
4.3 TRANSPARENCY AND OTHER VALUES 234
13. COMPARATIVE REASONING BY COURTS: SOME CLASSICAL POINTS REVISITED 237
1. THE LEGITIMACY 237
2. THE METHODOLOGY 240
2.1 THE CHALLENGES: OF CHERRIES AND MISUNDERSTANDINGS 240
2.2 BLURRED METHODOLOGY OR BLURRED YARDSTICKS? 242
3. THE PURPOSE 245
4. THE PREDICTABILITY 249
14. THE DEVIATIONS: POLITICAL OVER- AND NON-COMPARISONS 252
1. POLITICS OF COMPARISONS 252
2. OVER-COMPARISONS 255
2.1 THE NATURE OF A LEGAL TRANSITION 255
2.2 JUDICIARY IN A LEGAL TRANSITION 257
2.3 METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS: EXTERNAL INSPIRATION AND AUTHORITY 260
2.4 INSTITUTIONAL ASPECTS: FROM REVOLUTIONARY TRIBUNALS TO
REGULAR SUPREME JURISDICTIONS 265
2.5 OF LAW IMPORTATION AND TEMPORAL COLONIES 269
3. NON-COMPARISONS 272
3.1 SUPERIORITY, EXCLUSIVITY, AND POLITICAL CLOSURES 272
3.2 THE AMERICAN DEVIATION 274
CONCLUSIONS 282
SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY 288
INDEX 307
Tlie
last two decades have witnessed an exponential
growth in debates on trie use of foreign law by courts.
Different labels have been attached to the same phe¬
nomenon: judges drawing in
s
pi
j
-а
tion
from outside of
their national le^al systems for solving pure
lv
doineş¬
ti
с
disputes.
Вл
doing so, the judges are said to engage
in cross-border judicial dialogues.Thcv are creating a
larger, transnational community oi judges.
This book puts similar claims to test in relation to
highest national jurisdictions (supreme ai~i<l constitu¬
tional courts) in Europe to
dav.
Нол
v
often and
wh
v
do
¡udereš
choose to draw inspiration
trom
foreign mate-
rials in solvina domestic cases?The book addresses
these questions
írom
both an empirical and a theoreti¬
cal antrle. Empirically, the genuine use of comparative
arguments
b v
national highest courts in five
F u
rope an
jurisdictions is examined:
E n
ц
la rid andWalcs,
Fraitcc^,
Germanv, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia. On the
basis of comparative discussion of the practice and its
national theoretical underpinning in these and par¬
tial
ìv
also in other European systems, an overreaching
theoretical framework for the current judicial use of
comparative arguments is developed.
Drawing on the author's own past practical experience
in a national supreme court, this book
isa
critical
account of judicial en^a^ement with
f
őreién
author
i tv
in Europe today. The sober middle ground
inductivei
v
conceptualized and
presenteei
in this book provides
solid jurisprudential foundations for the
опцоіпц
use
or comparative
arguments
by courts as well as its fur¬
ther scholar
ìv
discussion. |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Bobek, Michal 1977- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)140250077 |
| author_facet | Bobek, Michal 1977- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Bobek, Michal 1977- |
| author_variant | m b mb |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV041281613 |
| classification_rvk | PS 2960 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)847020016 (DE-599)BVBBV041281613 |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| edition | 1. ed. |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV041281613</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20140508</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">130920s2013 xx |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9780199680382</subfield><subfield code="c">hardback</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-19-968038-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">0199680388</subfield><subfield code="c">hardback</subfield><subfield code="9">0-19-968038-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)847020016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV041281613</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PS 2960</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139745:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bobek, Michal</subfield><subfield code="d">1977-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)140250077</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Comparative reasoning in European Supreme Courts</subfield><subfield code="c">Michal Bobek</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1. ed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford</subfield><subfield code="b">Oxford Univ. Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">VIII, 310 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsvergleich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115712-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Entscheidungsfindung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113446-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Oberster Gerichtshof</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4172291-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Mitgliedsstaaten</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4170174-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Mitgliedsstaaten</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4170174-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Oberster Gerichtshof</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4172291-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Entscheidungsfindung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113446-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Rechtsvergleich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115712-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">SWB Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=026255038&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Passau - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=026255038&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Klappentext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090511</subfield><subfield code="g">4373</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090511</subfield><subfield code="g">4371</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090512</subfield><subfield code="g">4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090511</subfield><subfield code="g">4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090512</subfield><subfield code="g">4373</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090512</subfield><subfield code="g">4371</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-026255038</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV041281613 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2025-01-02T11:44:01Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-026255038 |
| oclc_num | 847020016 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-188 DE-739 DE-29 DE-384 DE-11 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-188 DE-739 DE-29 DE-384 DE-11 |
| physical | VIII, 310 S. |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| publishDateSearch | 2013 |
| publishDateSort | 2013 |
| publisher | Oxford Univ. Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Bobek, Michal 1977- Verfasser (DE-588)140250077 aut Comparative reasoning in European Supreme Courts Michal Bobek 1. ed. Oxford Oxford Univ. Press 2013 VIII, 310 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd rswk-swf Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd rswk-swf Entscheidungsfindung (DE-588)4113446-1 gnd rswk-swf Oberster Gerichtshof (DE-588)4172291-7 gnd rswk-swf Mitgliedsstaaten (DE-588)4170174-4 gnd rswk-swf Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 b Mitgliedsstaaten (DE-588)4170174-4 s Oberster Gerichtshof (DE-588)4172291-7 s Entscheidungsfindung (DE-588)4113446-1 s Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 s DE-604 SWB Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=026255038&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung UB Passau - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=026255038&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Klappentext |
| spellingShingle | Bobek, Michal 1977- Comparative reasoning in European Supreme Courts Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd Entscheidungsfindung (DE-588)4113446-1 gnd Oberster Gerichtshof (DE-588)4172291-7 gnd Mitgliedsstaaten (DE-588)4170174-4 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)5098525-5 (DE-588)4115712-6 (DE-588)4113446-1 (DE-588)4172291-7 (DE-588)4170174-4 |
| title | Comparative reasoning in European Supreme Courts |
| title_auth | Comparative reasoning in European Supreme Courts |
| title_exact_search | Comparative reasoning in European Supreme Courts |
| title_full | Comparative reasoning in European Supreme Courts Michal Bobek |
| title_fullStr | Comparative reasoning in European Supreme Courts Michal Bobek |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative reasoning in European Supreme Courts Michal Bobek |
| title_short | Comparative reasoning in European Supreme Courts |
| title_sort | comparative reasoning in european supreme courts |
| topic | Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd Entscheidungsfindung (DE-588)4113446-1 gnd Oberster Gerichtshof (DE-588)4172291-7 gnd Mitgliedsstaaten (DE-588)4170174-4 gnd |
| topic_facet | Europäische Union Rechtsvergleich Entscheidungsfindung Oberster Gerichtshof Mitgliedsstaaten |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=026255038&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=026255038&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bobekmichal comparativereasoningineuropeansupremecourts |