Why do they want the UN to decide?: A two-step model of public support for UN authority
Why do citizens support or reject the idea of global authority? The paper addresses this question by examining individual attitudes about UN authority in a comparative perspective. According to the main argument put forward in this paper, we may think of the formation of citizens' support for i...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Bremen
Univ., Sonderforschungsbereich 597 Staatlichkeit im Wandel
2013
|
| Schriftenreihe: | TranState working papers
171 |
| Zusammenfassung: | Why do citizens support or reject the idea of global authority? The paper addresses this question by examining individual attitudes about UN authority in a comparative perspective. According to the main argument put forward in this paper, we may think of the formation of citizens' support for international authority as a two-step process. First, the paper theorizes the formation of global attitudes about the UN according to a process of cognitive mobilization. Using data from the fifth wave of the World Values Survey (2005-2007), I find strong empirical support for the role of individual attention to public cues for the relevance of the UN in rising global awareness of UN authority. In the second step, the paper examines how cognitively mobilized citizens use available information to make up their minds about UN authority. The analysis shows that global public support for UN authority largely depends on a cosmopolitan understanding of global interdependence and moral universalism. However, the analysis of contextual variables also suggests that a "particularist" calculus of national costs and benefits explains citizens' support for (and rejection of) UN authority to a remarkable extent. |
| Beschreibung: | Online-Ausg. im Internet |
| Beschreibung: | 32 S. |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV041280798 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 130919s2013 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)859417698 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBV767132378 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias |d 1967- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)122776933 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Why do they want the UN to decide? |b A two-step model of public support for UN authority |c Matthias Ecker-Ehrhardt |
| 264 | 1 | |a Bremen |b Univ., Sonderforschungsbereich 597 Staatlichkeit im Wandel |c 2013 | |
| 300 | |a 32 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a TranState working papers |v 171 | |
| 500 | |a Online-Ausg. im Internet | ||
| 520 | 8 | |a Why do citizens support or reject the idea of global authority? The paper addresses this question by examining individual attitudes about UN authority in a comparative perspective. According to the main argument put forward in this paper, we may think of the formation of citizens' support for international authority as a two-step process. First, the paper theorizes the formation of global attitudes about the UN according to a process of cognitive mobilization. Using data from the fifth wave of the World Values Survey (2005-2007), I find strong empirical support for the role of individual attention to public cues for the relevance of the UN in rising global awareness of UN authority. In the second step, the paper examines how cognitively mobilized citizens use available information to make up their minds about UN authority. The analysis shows that global public support for UN authority largely depends on a cosmopolitan understanding of global interdependence and moral universalism. However, the analysis of contextual variables also suggests that a "particularist" calculus of national costs and benefits explains citizens' support for (and rejection of) UN authority to a remarkable extent. | |
| 830 | 0 | |a TranState working papers |v 171 |w (DE-604)BV021601524 |9 171 | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-026254232 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804150751897845760 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias 1967- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)122776933 |
| author_facet | Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias 1967- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias 1967- |
| author_variant | m e e mee |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV041280798 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)859417698 (DE-599)GBV767132378 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02153nam a2200289 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV041280798</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">130919s2013 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)859417698</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBV767132378</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias</subfield><subfield code="d">1967-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)122776933</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Why do they want the UN to decide?</subfield><subfield code="b">A two-step model of public support for UN authority</subfield><subfield code="c">Matthias Ecker-Ehrhardt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Bremen</subfield><subfield code="b">Univ., Sonderforschungsbereich 597 Staatlichkeit im Wandel</subfield><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">32 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">TranState working papers</subfield><subfield code="v">171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Online-Ausg. im Internet</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Why do citizens support or reject the idea of global authority? The paper addresses this question by examining individual attitudes about UN authority in a comparative perspective. According to the main argument put forward in this paper, we may think of the formation of citizens' support for international authority as a two-step process. First, the paper theorizes the formation of global attitudes about the UN according to a process of cognitive mobilization. Using data from the fifth wave of the World Values Survey (2005-2007), I find strong empirical support for the role of individual attention to public cues for the relevance of the UN in rising global awareness of UN authority. In the second step, the paper examines how cognitively mobilized citizens use available information to make up their minds about UN authority. The analysis shows that global public support for UN authority largely depends on a cosmopolitan understanding of global interdependence and moral universalism. However, the analysis of contextual variables also suggests that a "particularist" calculus of national costs and benefits explains citizens' support for (and rejection of) UN authority to a remarkable extent.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">TranState working papers</subfield><subfield code="v">171</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV021601524</subfield><subfield code="9">171</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-026254232</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV041280798 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T00:43:54Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-026254232 |
| oclc_num | 859417698 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 32 S. |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| publishDateSearch | 2013 |
| publishDateSort | 2013 |
| publisher | Univ., Sonderforschungsbereich 597 Staatlichkeit im Wandel |
| record_format | marc |
| series | TranState working papers |
| series2 | TranState working papers |
| spelling | Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias 1967- Verfasser (DE-588)122776933 aut Why do they want the UN to decide? A two-step model of public support for UN authority Matthias Ecker-Ehrhardt Bremen Univ., Sonderforschungsbereich 597 Staatlichkeit im Wandel 2013 32 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier TranState working papers 171 Online-Ausg. im Internet Why do citizens support or reject the idea of global authority? The paper addresses this question by examining individual attitudes about UN authority in a comparative perspective. According to the main argument put forward in this paper, we may think of the formation of citizens' support for international authority as a two-step process. First, the paper theorizes the formation of global attitudes about the UN according to a process of cognitive mobilization. Using data from the fifth wave of the World Values Survey (2005-2007), I find strong empirical support for the role of individual attention to public cues for the relevance of the UN in rising global awareness of UN authority. In the second step, the paper examines how cognitively mobilized citizens use available information to make up their minds about UN authority. The analysis shows that global public support for UN authority largely depends on a cosmopolitan understanding of global interdependence and moral universalism. However, the analysis of contextual variables also suggests that a "particularist" calculus of national costs and benefits explains citizens' support for (and rejection of) UN authority to a remarkable extent. TranState working papers 171 (DE-604)BV021601524 171 |
| spellingShingle | Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias 1967- Why do they want the UN to decide? A two-step model of public support for UN authority TranState working papers |
| title | Why do they want the UN to decide? A two-step model of public support for UN authority |
| title_auth | Why do they want the UN to decide? A two-step model of public support for UN authority |
| title_exact_search | Why do they want the UN to decide? A two-step model of public support for UN authority |
| title_full | Why do they want the UN to decide? A two-step model of public support for UN authority Matthias Ecker-Ehrhardt |
| title_fullStr | Why do they want the UN to decide? A two-step model of public support for UN authority Matthias Ecker-Ehrhardt |
| title_full_unstemmed | Why do they want the UN to decide? A two-step model of public support for UN authority Matthias Ecker-Ehrhardt |
| title_short | Why do they want the UN to decide? |
| title_sort | why do they want the un to decide a two step model of public support for un authority |
| title_sub | A two-step model of public support for UN authority |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV021601524 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT eckerehrhardtmatthias whydotheywanttheuntodecideatwostepmodelofpublicsupportforunauthority |