Sharing power?: prospects for a U.S. concert-balance strategy
The subject of U.S. grand strategy has been getting increasing attention from the policy and academic communities. However, too often the debate suffers from being too reductionist, limiting America's choices to worldwide hegemony or narrow isolation. There is a wide spectrum of choices before...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Carlisle Barracks, PA
U.S. Army War College Press [u.a.]
2013
|
Schlagworte: | |
Zusammenfassung: | The subject of U.S. grand strategy has been getting increasing attention from the policy and academic communities. However, too often the debate suffers from being too reductionist, limiting America's choices to worldwide hegemony or narrow isolation. There is a wide spectrum of choices before Washington that lie "somewhere in the middle." Frequently, not enough thought is given to how such alternative strategies should be designed and implemented. The future cannot be known, and earlier predictions of American decline have proven to be premature. However, there is a shift in wealth and power to the extent that America may not be able to hold on to its position as an unrivaled unipolar superpower. Therefore, it is worth thinking about how the United States could shape and adjust to the changing landscape around it. What is more, there are a number of interlocking factors that mean such a shift would make sense: transnational problems needing collaborative efforts, the military advantages of defenders, the reluctance of states to engage in unbridled competition, and "hegemony fatigue" among the American people. Alternative strategies that are smaller than global hegemony, but bigger than narrow isolationism, would be defined by the logic of "concerts" and "balancing," in other words, some mixture of collaboration and competition. Can the United States adjust to a concert-balance grand strategy that made space for other rising powers without sacrificing too much of its forward military presence, without unleashing too much regional instability, and without losing the domestic political will? It is not certain that a cumulative shift to a new grand strategy would necessarily succeed, since other powers might turn down the chance to cooperate. But with soaring budget deficits and national debt, increasing burdens on social security, and possible agonizing choices in the future between guns and butter, it is surely worth a try |
Beschreibung: | "April 2013." Includes bibliographical references (pages 68-82) Introduction -- Part I : the state of strategy -- Part II : no free lunches : dilemmas, trade-offs, and opportunities -- Part III : making it work -- Conclusion |
Beschreibung: | VIII, 82 S. Ill. |
ISBN: | 9781584875666 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV041158642 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20130926 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 130722s2013 a||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 9781584875666 |c pbk. |9 978-1-58487-566-6 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)856835066 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV041158642 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Porter, Patrick |d 1976- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)101877758X |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Sharing power? |b prospects for a U.S. concert-balance strategy |c Patrick Porter |
264 | 1 | |a Carlisle Barracks, PA |b U.S. Army War College Press [u.a.] |c 2013 | |
300 | |a VIII, 82 S. |b Ill. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a "April 2013." | ||
500 | |a Includes bibliographical references (pages 68-82) | ||
500 | |a Introduction -- Part I : the state of strategy -- Part II : no free lunches : dilemmas, trade-offs, and opportunities -- Part III : making it work -- Conclusion | ||
520 | |a The subject of U.S. grand strategy has been getting increasing attention from the policy and academic communities. However, too often the debate suffers from being too reductionist, limiting America's choices to worldwide hegemony or narrow isolation. There is a wide spectrum of choices before Washington that lie "somewhere in the middle." Frequently, not enough thought is given to how such alternative strategies should be designed and implemented. The future cannot be known, and earlier predictions of American decline have proven to be premature. However, there is a shift in wealth and power to the extent that America may not be able to hold on to its position as an unrivaled unipolar superpower. Therefore, it is worth thinking about how the United States could shape and adjust to the changing landscape around it. What is more, there are a number of interlocking factors that mean such a shift would make sense: transnational problems needing collaborative efforts, the military advantages of defenders, the reluctance of states to engage in unbridled competition, and "hegemony fatigue" among the American people. Alternative strategies that are smaller than global hegemony, but bigger than narrow isolationism, would be defined by the logic of "concerts" and "balancing," in other words, some mixture of collaboration and competition. Can the United States adjust to a concert-balance grand strategy that made space for other rising powers without sacrificing too much of its forward military presence, without unleashing too much regional instability, and without losing the domestic political will? It is not certain that a cumulative shift to a new grand strategy would necessarily succeed, since other powers might turn down the chance to cooperate. But with soaring budget deficits and national debt, increasing burdens on social security, and possible agonizing choices in the future between guns and butter, it is surely worth a try | ||
650 | 4 | |a Balance of power | |
650 | 4 | |a Hegemony | |
650 | 4 | |a International relations | |
650 | 4 | |a Strategy | |
650 | 4 | |a Außenpolitik | |
650 | 4 | |a Internationale Politik | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Alternative |0 (DE-588)4138905-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Strategie |0 (DE-588)4057952-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Großmacht |0 (DE-588)4125218-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
651 | 4 | |a United States / Foreign relations | |
651 | 4 | |a USA | |
651 | 7 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |D g |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Großmacht |0 (DE-588)4125218-4 |D s |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Strategie |0 (DE-588)4057952-9 |D s |
689 | 0 | 3 | |a Alternative |0 (DE-588)4138905-0 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
710 | 2 | |a Strategic Studies Institute (Carlisle Barracks, Pa.) |e Sonstige |0 (DE-588)1046371-9 |4 oth | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-026133948 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804150564042309632 |
---|---|
any_adam_object | |
author | Porter, Patrick 1976- |
author_GND | (DE-588)101877758X |
author_facet | Porter, Patrick 1976- |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Porter, Patrick 1976- |
author_variant | p p pp |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV041158642 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)856835066 (DE-599)BVBBV041158642 |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03855nam a2200517 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV041158642</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20130926 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">130722s2013 a||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781584875666</subfield><subfield code="c">pbk.</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-58487-566-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)856835066</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV041158642</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Porter, Patrick</subfield><subfield code="d">1976-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)101877758X</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Sharing power?</subfield><subfield code="b">prospects for a U.S. concert-balance strategy</subfield><subfield code="c">Patrick Porter</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Carlisle Barracks, PA</subfield><subfield code="b">U.S. Army War College Press [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">VIII, 82 S.</subfield><subfield code="b">Ill.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"April 2013."</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references (pages 68-82)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Introduction -- Part I : the state of strategy -- Part II : no free lunches : dilemmas, trade-offs, and opportunities -- Part III : making it work -- Conclusion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The subject of U.S. grand strategy has been getting increasing attention from the policy and academic communities. However, too often the debate suffers from being too reductionist, limiting America's choices to worldwide hegemony or narrow isolation. There is a wide spectrum of choices before Washington that lie "somewhere in the middle." Frequently, not enough thought is given to how such alternative strategies should be designed and implemented. The future cannot be known, and earlier predictions of American decline have proven to be premature. However, there is a shift in wealth and power to the extent that America may not be able to hold on to its position as an unrivaled unipolar superpower. Therefore, it is worth thinking about how the United States could shape and adjust to the changing landscape around it. What is more, there are a number of interlocking factors that mean such a shift would make sense: transnational problems needing collaborative efforts, the military advantages of defenders, the reluctance of states to engage in unbridled competition, and "hegemony fatigue" among the American people. Alternative strategies that are smaller than global hegemony, but bigger than narrow isolationism, would be defined by the logic of "concerts" and "balancing," in other words, some mixture of collaboration and competition. Can the United States adjust to a concert-balance grand strategy that made space for other rising powers without sacrificing too much of its forward military presence, without unleashing too much regional instability, and without losing the domestic political will? It is not certain that a cumulative shift to a new grand strategy would necessarily succeed, since other powers might turn down the chance to cooperate. But with soaring budget deficits and national debt, increasing burdens on social security, and possible agonizing choices in the future between guns and butter, it is surely worth a try</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Balance of power</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Hegemony</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">International relations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Strategy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Außenpolitik</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Internationale Politik</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Alternative</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4138905-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Strategie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4057952-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Großmacht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4125218-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States / Foreign relations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Großmacht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4125218-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Strategie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4057952-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Alternative</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4138905-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Strategic Studies Institute (Carlisle Barracks, Pa.)</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1046371-9</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-026133948</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | United States / Foreign relations USA USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd |
geographic_facet | United States / Foreign relations USA |
id | DE-604.BV041158642 |
illustrated | Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T00:40:55Z |
institution | BVB |
institution_GND | (DE-588)1046371-9 |
isbn | 9781584875666 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-026133948 |
oclc_num | 856835066 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 |
owner_facet | DE-12 |
physical | VIII, 82 S. Ill. |
publishDate | 2013 |
publishDateSearch | 2013 |
publishDateSort | 2013 |
publisher | U.S. Army War College Press [u.a.] |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Porter, Patrick 1976- Verfasser (DE-588)101877758X aut Sharing power? prospects for a U.S. concert-balance strategy Patrick Porter Carlisle Barracks, PA U.S. Army War College Press [u.a.] 2013 VIII, 82 S. Ill. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier "April 2013." Includes bibliographical references (pages 68-82) Introduction -- Part I : the state of strategy -- Part II : no free lunches : dilemmas, trade-offs, and opportunities -- Part III : making it work -- Conclusion The subject of U.S. grand strategy has been getting increasing attention from the policy and academic communities. However, too often the debate suffers from being too reductionist, limiting America's choices to worldwide hegemony or narrow isolation. There is a wide spectrum of choices before Washington that lie "somewhere in the middle." Frequently, not enough thought is given to how such alternative strategies should be designed and implemented. The future cannot be known, and earlier predictions of American decline have proven to be premature. However, there is a shift in wealth and power to the extent that America may not be able to hold on to its position as an unrivaled unipolar superpower. Therefore, it is worth thinking about how the United States could shape and adjust to the changing landscape around it. What is more, there are a number of interlocking factors that mean such a shift would make sense: transnational problems needing collaborative efforts, the military advantages of defenders, the reluctance of states to engage in unbridled competition, and "hegemony fatigue" among the American people. Alternative strategies that are smaller than global hegemony, but bigger than narrow isolationism, would be defined by the logic of "concerts" and "balancing," in other words, some mixture of collaboration and competition. Can the United States adjust to a concert-balance grand strategy that made space for other rising powers without sacrificing too much of its forward military presence, without unleashing too much regional instability, and without losing the domestic political will? It is not certain that a cumulative shift to a new grand strategy would necessarily succeed, since other powers might turn down the chance to cooperate. But with soaring budget deficits and national debt, increasing burdens on social security, and possible agonizing choices in the future between guns and butter, it is surely worth a try Balance of power Hegemony International relations Strategy Außenpolitik Internationale Politik Alternative (DE-588)4138905-0 gnd rswk-swf Strategie (DE-588)4057952-9 gnd rswk-swf Großmacht (DE-588)4125218-4 gnd rswk-swf United States / Foreign relations USA USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd rswk-swf USA (DE-588)4078704-7 g Großmacht (DE-588)4125218-4 s Strategie (DE-588)4057952-9 s Alternative (DE-588)4138905-0 s DE-604 Strategic Studies Institute (Carlisle Barracks, Pa.) Sonstige (DE-588)1046371-9 oth |
spellingShingle | Porter, Patrick 1976- Sharing power? prospects for a U.S. concert-balance strategy Balance of power Hegemony International relations Strategy Außenpolitik Internationale Politik Alternative (DE-588)4138905-0 gnd Strategie (DE-588)4057952-9 gnd Großmacht (DE-588)4125218-4 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4138905-0 (DE-588)4057952-9 (DE-588)4125218-4 (DE-588)4078704-7 |
title | Sharing power? prospects for a U.S. concert-balance strategy |
title_auth | Sharing power? prospects for a U.S. concert-balance strategy |
title_exact_search | Sharing power? prospects for a U.S. concert-balance strategy |
title_full | Sharing power? prospects for a U.S. concert-balance strategy Patrick Porter |
title_fullStr | Sharing power? prospects for a U.S. concert-balance strategy Patrick Porter |
title_full_unstemmed | Sharing power? prospects for a U.S. concert-balance strategy Patrick Porter |
title_short | Sharing power? |
title_sort | sharing power prospects for a u s concert balance strategy |
title_sub | prospects for a U.S. concert-balance strategy |
topic | Balance of power Hegemony International relations Strategy Außenpolitik Internationale Politik Alternative (DE-588)4138905-0 gnd Strategie (DE-588)4057952-9 gnd Großmacht (DE-588)4125218-4 gnd |
topic_facet | Balance of power Hegemony International relations Strategy Außenpolitik Internationale Politik Alternative Strategie Großmacht United States / Foreign relations USA |
work_keys_str_mv | AT porterpatrick sharingpowerprospectsforausconcertbalancestrategy AT strategicstudiesinstitutecarlislebarrackspa sharingpowerprospectsforausconcertbalancestrategy |