Arbitration in China: a legal and cultural analysis
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Oxford [u.a.]
Hart
2013
|
| Schriftenreihe: | China and international economic law series
5 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | LI, 313 S. graph. Darst. |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV040797635 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20161212 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 130305s2013 d||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |z 1849463778 |9 1-84946-377-8 | ||
| 020 | |z 9781849463775 |9 978-1-84946-377-5 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)844034805 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV040797635 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-739 |a DE-945 |a DE-M382 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 347.5109 | |
| 084 | |a PU 8450 |0 (DE-625)140717: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Fan, Kun |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1033301574 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Arbitration in China |b a legal and cultural analysis |c Kun Fan |
| 264 | 1 | |a Oxford [u.a.] |b Hart |c 2013 | |
| 300 | |a LI, 313 S. |b graph. Darst. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a China and international economic law series |v 5 | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Schlichtung |0 (DE-588)4052717-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit |0 (DE-588)4052348-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a China |0 (DE-588)4009937-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a China |0 (DE-588)4009937-4 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Schlichtung |0 (DE-588)4052717-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit |0 (DE-588)4052348-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |C b |5 DE-604 | |
| 830 | 0 | |a China and international economic law series |v 5 |w (DE-604)BV021675724 |9 5 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Passau |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025777796&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-025777796 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804150133932163072 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | Table
of Contents
Foreword
v
Gábriellé
Kaufmann-Kohler
Preface
vii
Acknowledgements
ix
List of Abbreviations
xxiii
Table of Cases
xxv
Table of Legislation
xxxiii
Introduction
1
1
Overview of the Chinese Legal Framework and Arbitration System
9
1.1
Chinese Judicial Organisation
10
1.2
Legal Framework
12
1.2.1
Public Sources
12
A. National Sources
12
B. International Sources
14
a. International Conventions
14
b. Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs)
15
1.2.2
Private Sources
16
1.3
Historical Development of Arbitration Legislation in China
17
1.3.1
Prior to the Enactment of the Arbitration Law
17
A. Domestic Arbitration
17
B. Foreign-related Arbitration
18
1.3.2
After the Implementation of the Arbitration Law
20
1.4
Types of Arbitration in China
21
1.4.1
Classification of Arbitration in the Arbitration Law and
Civil Procedure Law
21
1.4.2
Lack of Recognition of the Concept of Legal Seat
23
1.4.3
Dual System in the Current Legal Regime
25
A. Domestic Arbitration may not be Seated Outside
China
26
B. Chinese Substantive Law Applies in Domestic
Arbitration
26
C. Domestic Arbitration is Subject to Substantive Review
by the Courts
26
xiv
Table
of
Contents
D.
Report System
Applies Only to Foreign-related
Arbitration
27
2
Arbitration Agreement
29
2.1
The Principle of Severability of the Arbitration Agreement
29
2.1.1
Transnational Standards
30
2.1.2
Law and Practice in China
31
A. Application of the Autonomy of the Arbitration
Agreement with a Limited Scope
31
B. Misapplication of the Principle of Severability
33
2.2
The Substantive Requirements for the Validity of the
Arbitration Agreement
34
2.2.1
Transnational Standards
35
2.2.2
Law and Practice in China
37
A. Strict Interpretation of Defective Arbitration Clauses
38
B. Exclusion of Ad Hoc Arbitration
40
a. Enforcement of Foreign Ad Hoc Awards in China
42
b. Legal Obstacles to the Recognition of Ad Hoc
Arbitration in China
44
С
Unclear Status of Foreign Arbitration Institutions
44
a. Practical Difficulties
45
(i) Whether a Clause Selecting the ICC Rules
without Specifying the ICC Court as the
Arbitral institution is Valid
45
(it) Whether the Designation of the ICC Court
as the Arbitration Institution Satisfies the
Requirement of Article
16
of the Arbitration
Law
46
b. Inconsistent Court Decisions
47
с
Legal Obstacles
50
f
і)
Lack of Recognition of the Concept of Seat
50
(it) Policy Consideration
51
3
Arbitral Tribunal
53
3.1
Arbitral Jurisdiction
53
3.1.1
Transnational Standards
54
A. The Principle of Competence-competence
54
B. The Court s Review of the Arbitral Tribunal s
Jurisdictional Decision
54
Table
of Contents
xv
3.1.2
Chinese Practice
56
A. Arbitration Institution
v
Arbitral Tribunal
57
B. Court
v
Arbitration Institution
59
3.2
Constitution of the Arbitral Tribunal
61
3.2.1
Transnational Standards
61
A. The Appointment Mechanism
62
B. Independence, Impartiality and Availability of
Arbitrators
62
3.2.2
Chinese Practice
64
A. The Appointment Mechanism
64
a. Strict Statutory Qualification of Arbitrators
64
b. Compulsory Panel System
65
B. Independence and Impartiality of Arbitrators
67
Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
71
4.1
Transnational Standards
72
4.1.1
Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
72
A. Grounds which Must be Raised by the Party Resisting
Recognition or Enforcement
74
a. Incapacity or Invalid Arbitration Agreement
(Article V(l)(a) of the New York Convention)
74
b. No Proper Notice of Appointment of Arbitrator
or of the Proceedings; Lack of Due Process
(Article V(l)(b) of the New York Convention)
74
с
Ultra Vires (Article V(l)(c) of the New York
Convention)
74
d. Composition of Tribunal or Procedure not in
Accordance with Arbitration Agreement or the
Relevant Law (Article V(l)(d) of the New York
Convention)
75
e. Award not Binding, Suspended, or Set Aside
(Article V(l)(e) of the New York Convention)
76
(i) Award not Binding
76
(it) Award is Set Aside
77
(Hi) Award is Suspended
78
B. Grounds which can be Raised by the Courts on their
Own Motion
79
a. Arbitrability (Article V(2)(a) of the New York
Convention)
79
xvi
Table
of
Contents
b.
Public
Policy
(Article
V(2) (b)
of the New York
Convention)
80
4.1.2
Setting Aside of Arbitral Awards
81
4.2
Chinese Practice
82
4.2.1
The Legal Regime
83
A. Legal Framework
83
a. Setting Aside of Arbitral Awards
83
(i) Domestic Awards
83
(ii) Foreign-related Awards
84
b. Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards
84
(i) Domestic Awards
84
(ii) Foreign-related Awards
85
(Hi) Foreign Awards
85
B. Unique Features of the Legislation
87
a. Substantive Review for Domestic Awards
87
b. No Discretion for the Court to Decide upon
Enforcement
88
с
Report System for Foreign-related and Foreign
Awards
88
d. Dual Supervision Mechanism
90
4.2.2
Statistical Assessment of the Enforcement Record
91
4.2.3
Case Analysis
95
A. Setting Aside/Recognition and Enforcement of
Foreign-related Awards
95
a. Lack of a Valid Arbitration Agreement
(Article
274(1) (1)
of the Civil Procedure Law)
95
b. Violation of Due Process (Article
274(1) (2)
of the
Civil Procedure Law)
96
с
Irregularities in the Composition of the Arbitral
Tribunal or in the Arbitral Procedure Pursuant to
the Rules of Arbitration (Article
274(1)(3)
of the
Civil Procedure Law)
97
d. The Matters Decided in the Award Exceed the
Scope of the Arbitration Agreement or the Authority
of the Arbitration Institution (Article
274(1) (4)
of the Civil Procedure Law)
99
e. Social and Public Interest (Article
274(2)
of the
Civil Procedure Law)
100
B. Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Awards
101
Table
of
Contents
xvii
a.
Incapacity or Invalid Arbitration Agreement
(Article V(l)(a) of the New York Convention)
101
b. No Proper Notice of Appointment of Arbitrator
or of the Proceedings; Lack of Due Process
(Article V(l)(b) of the New York Convention)
105
с
Ultra Vires (Article V(l)(c) of the New York
Convention)
106
d. Composition of Tribunal or Procedure not in
Accordance with Arbitration Agreement or the
Relevant Law (Article V(l)(d) of the New York
Convention)
107
e. Award not Binding, Suspended, or Set Aside
(Article V(l) (e) of the New York Convention)
109
f. Arbitrability (Article V(2)(a) of the New York
Convention)
110
g. Public Policy (Article V(2) (b) of the New York
Convention)
110
C. Further Observations Arising From the Case Analysis
112
a. Inconsistent Decisions
112
b. Local Protectionism
113
с
Problems of Delays
113
The Practice of Arbitration Institutions
114
5.1
Legislative Background of the Establishment of Arbitration
Institutions in China
114
5.2
Comparison between the CIETAC and the ICC Court
117
5.2.1
Establishment, Nature, and Development
118
A. The ICC Court
118
B. The CIETAC
119
a. Founding Period
(1956-1966) 121
b. Adjustment Period
(1967-1979) 121
с
Growth Period
(1980-1988) 121
d. Acceleration Period
(1989-1994) 122
e. Expansion Period (1995-present)
122
5.2.2
Structure and Personnel Management
123
A. The ICC Court
123
B. The CIETAC
124
5.2.3
Financial Management
125
A. The ICC Court
125
B. The CIETAC
125
xviii
Table
of Contents
5.2.4
Relationship between the Arbitration Institution and
Arbitrators
127
A. Institution s General Role in Case Management
127
a. The ICC Court
127
b. TheCIETAC
128
B. Allocation of Fees
129
a. The ICC Court
129
b. TheCIETAC
130
C. Scrutiny of Arbitral Awards
131
a. The ICC Court
131
b. TheCIETAC
132
5.3
Status of Local Arbitration Institutions in China
133
5.3.1
The Establishment: Government Support
134
5.3.2
The Government s Interference Continues After the
Establishment
134
6
The Combination of Mediation with Arbitration
137
6.1
The Theoretical Debates on the Arbitrators Role in
Settlement Facilitation
138
6.1.1
Supporters of Arb-Med
139
A. Mission of Arbitrators to Resolve the Dispute in the
Most Efficient Way
139
B. Free Will and Voluntariness of the Parties
140
C. Efficiency of Dispute Resolution
141
6.1.2
Opponents of Arb-Med
142
A. Mission of Arbitrators to Render a Binding Decision
143
B. Due Process and Natural Justice
143
C. Impartiality of Arbitrators
143
6.2
Comparative Study of the Law and Practice of Arb-Med
144
6.2.1
National Laws
144
A. Civil Law Jurisdictions
144
B. Common Law Jurisdictions
146
6.2.2
Institutional Rules
148
6.2.3
Actual Arbitration Practice: Some Empirical Studies
151
A. Two Surveys of Arbitration and Mediation
Practitioners
(1994, 2004) 151
B. Corporate Attitudes and Practices about
International Arbitration
(2008) 152
Table
of Contents
xix
C.
A Survey of Arbitration and Settlement in
International Commercial Disputes in Asia
(2006-2007) 153
D. Summary of the Empirical Findings
154
6.3
The Chinese Experience of Combining Mediation with
Arbitration
155
6.3.1
Mediation in General
155
A. Historical Development
155
B. Contemporary Practice
159
a. People s Mediation
159
b. Administrative Mediation
160
с
Institutional Mediation
161
d. Mediation within Litigation Proceedings
162
6.3.2
Mediation within Arbitration Proceedings
163
A. Historical Development
163
B. Contemporary Practice
164
a. Who Raises the Idea of Mediation during the
Arbitration Proceedings, the Parties or the
Arbitral Tribunal?
165
b. When do Arbitrators make the Mediation
Proposal?
166
с
How do Arbitrators Facilitate Settlement?
166
(i)
Facultative
or Evaluative
166
(ii) Meeting the Parties Separately or Caucusing
166
(Hi) Giving Opinions on the Merits
167
(iv)
Proposing a Settlement Formula
167
d. Chinese Approaches to the Concerns of Arb-Med
168
7
Chinese Characteristics in Arbitration Law and Practice
170
7.1
Deficiencies in the Legislation
171
7.2
Inconsistencies in the Implementation of the Law
173
7.3
Administrative Intervention
173
7.4
Conceptual Differences
174
7.4.1
The Western Concept of Consensual Arbitration
-
Bottom-up
175
7.4.2
The Chinese Notion of Arbitration
-
Top-down
179
7.5
The Emphasis on Amicable Resolution of Disputes
180
8
Traditional Legal Culture and Its Influence on Contemporary
Arbitration Practice
181
xx
Table
of
Contents
8.1
The Emphasis on Rituals
185
8.1.1
Li v
Fa
186
8.1.2
Codification Centered on Criminal Offences and
Rigidity of Written Law
189
8.1.3
Implementation of Law: Qing mixed with Fa
190
8.2
The Emphasis on Relational Network
192
8.3
The Emphasis on Harmony and Conflict Avoidance
194
8.3.1
Philosophical Influence
194
8.3.2
Practice to Suppress Litigation
196
A. Suppression of Litigation by Local Magistrates
196
B. Limitation on Individual s Right to Sue within
Local Groups
199
8.4
Commercial History and Dispute Resolution
200
8.4.1
Agrarian Economy and Lack of Commercial Laws
201
8.4.2
Resolution of Commercial Disputes
203
A. Government-organised Marketplaces
203
B. Guilds (hanghui) and
Landsmannschaften (huiguan) 204
C. Transplantation of Arbitration in China
207
8.5
Analysis of Historical Links to Modern Practice
208
8.5.1
Flexibility in Implementation of the Law and the
Emphasis on Equity
-
The Historical Emphasis on
Rituals
209
8.5.2
The Conceptual Differences in Arbitration
-
The Historical Emphasis on Relational Network
210
8.5.3
The Emphasis on Amicable Resolution
-
The Historical
Legal Culture of Avoidance of Litigation
211
9
The Modernisation of Law and Cultural Influences on
Arbitration Practice
213
9.1
The Role of Law in Modern China
216
9.1.1
The Instrumental Notion of Law
217
9.1.2
The Remarkable Burst of Legislative Efforts and the
Lack of an Integrated Legal System
218
9.1.3
The Implementation of Law: heqing,
heli, hefa
220
9.2
The Role of the Individual in Modern China
220
9.3
The Cultural Aversion to Formal Dispute Resolution
221
9.3.1
The Impact of Communist Ideology
221
9.3.2
The Relational Mode of Association
222
9.4
The Development of Commercial Law in the Economic
Transition
223
Table
of Contents
xxi
9.4.1
Centralised Planned Economy and Internal Resolution
223
9.4.2
Development of Commercial Law in the Transition
to the Market Economy
224
A. Legislative Efforts to Establish Recognition and
Authorisation of Private Rights Legally
224
B. Continued State Control and the Straggle for
Authority among Central, Provincial and Local
Government
225
9.5
Explanation of Contemporary Arbitral Practice From Cultural
and Historical Perspectives
226
9.5.1
Tolerance of Uncertainty and the Notion of Biantong
-
The Sustained Tolerance of Uncertainty
227
9.5.2
The Lack of Party Autonomy and Administrative
Features of Arbitration
-
The Collectivist Society
228
9.5.3
The Wide Use of Mediation
-
The Cultural Preference
for Amicable Resolution
229
10
Conclusion
232
10.1
Adaptations of Chinese Law and Practice Towards
Transnational Standards
233
10.1.1
Legislative Reforms
234
10.1.2
Institutional Reforms
235
A. Reforms of the Financial System
235
B. Reforms of the Management System
236
a. Management of Arbitrators
236
fi)
Hiring of Arbitrators
236
(it) Independence of Arbitrators
237
(in) Training and Assessment of Arbitrators
237
(iv)
Arbitrators Remuneration
237
b. Management of its Personnel
237
с
Information Network Management System
238
C. Innovations in Arbitration Service
238
a. Partial Settlement
238
b. Confirmation Arbitration
238
10.1.3
Chinese Adaptations to Arb-Med
239
10.2
The Influence of Chinese Legal Culture on the Practice of
Arbitration Worldwide
241
xxii
Table
of
Contents
Bibliography
247
Books
247
Theses
252
Articles
253
Conference Papers
270
Official and Historical Documents
271
Appendix
1:
Arbitration Law of the People s Republic of China
(1995) 273
Appendix
2:
Interpretation of the
SPC on
Certain Issues Relating
to Application of the Arbitration Law of the People s Republic
of China
(2006) 287
Appendix
3:
Relevant Provisions of the Civil Procedure Law
(2012
Amendment)
293
Index
295
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Fan, Kun |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1033301574 |
| author_facet | Fan, Kun |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Fan, Kun |
| author_variant | k f kf |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV040797635 |
| classification_rvk | PU 8450 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)844034805 (DE-599)BVBBV040797635 |
| dewey-full | 347.5109 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 347 - Procedure and courts |
| dewey-raw | 347.5109 |
| dewey-search | 347.5109 |
| dewey-sort | 3347.5109 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01634nam a2200409 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV040797635</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20161212 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">130305s2013 d||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">1849463778</subfield><subfield code="9">1-84946-377-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9781849463775</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-84946-377-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)844034805</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV040797635</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-945</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">347.5109</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PU 8450</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)140717:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fan, Kun</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1033301574</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Arbitration in China</subfield><subfield code="b">a legal and cultural analysis</subfield><subfield code="c">Kun Fan</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Hart</subfield><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LI, 313 S.</subfield><subfield code="b">graph. Darst.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">China and international economic law series</subfield><subfield code="v">5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Schlichtung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4052717-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4052348-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">China</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4009937-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">China</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4009937-4</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Schlichtung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4052717-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4052348-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="C">b</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">China and international economic law series</subfield><subfield code="v">5</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV021675724</subfield><subfield code="9">5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Passau</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025777796&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-025777796</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | China (DE-588)4009937-4 gnd |
| geographic_facet | China |
| id | DE-604.BV040797635 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T00:34:05Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-025777796 |
| oclc_num | 844034805 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-739 DE-945 DE-M382 |
| owner_facet | DE-739 DE-945 DE-M382 |
| physical | LI, 313 S. graph. Darst. |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| publishDateSearch | 2013 |
| publishDateSort | 2013 |
| publisher | Hart |
| record_format | marc |
| series | China and international economic law series |
| series2 | China and international economic law series |
| spelling | Fan, Kun Verfasser (DE-588)1033301574 aut Arbitration in China a legal and cultural analysis Kun Fan Oxford [u.a.] Hart 2013 LI, 313 S. graph. Darst. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier China and international economic law series 5 Schlichtung (DE-588)4052717-7 gnd rswk-swf Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4052348-2 gnd rswk-swf China (DE-588)4009937-4 gnd rswk-swf China (DE-588)4009937-4 g Schlichtung (DE-588)4052717-7 s Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4052348-2 s b DE-604 China and international economic law series 5 (DE-604)BV021675724 5 Digitalisierung UB Passau application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025777796&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Fan, Kun Arbitration in China a legal and cultural analysis China and international economic law series Schlichtung (DE-588)4052717-7 gnd Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4052348-2 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4052717-7 (DE-588)4052348-2 (DE-588)4009937-4 |
| title | Arbitration in China a legal and cultural analysis |
| title_auth | Arbitration in China a legal and cultural analysis |
| title_exact_search | Arbitration in China a legal and cultural analysis |
| title_full | Arbitration in China a legal and cultural analysis Kun Fan |
| title_fullStr | Arbitration in China a legal and cultural analysis Kun Fan |
| title_full_unstemmed | Arbitration in China a legal and cultural analysis Kun Fan |
| title_short | Arbitration in China |
| title_sort | arbitration in china a legal and cultural analysis |
| title_sub | a legal and cultural analysis |
| topic | Schlichtung (DE-588)4052717-7 gnd Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit (DE-588)4052348-2 gnd |
| topic_facet | Schlichtung Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit China |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025777796&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV021675724 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT fankun arbitrationinchinaalegalandculturalanalysis |