Too much free speech?:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Urbana [u.a.]
Univ. of Illinois Press
2012
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Beschreibung: | "Randall P. Bezanson takes up an essential and timely inquiry into the Constitutional limits of the Supreme Court's power to create, interpret, and enforce one of the essential rights of American citizens. Analyzing contemporary Supreme Court decisions from the past fifteen years, Bezanson argues that judicial interpretations have fundamentally and drastically expanded the meaning and understanding of "speech." Bezanson focuses on judgments such as the much-discussed Citizens United case, which granted the full measure of constitutional protection to speech by corporations, and the Doe vs. Reed case in Washington state, which recognized the signing of petitions and voting in elections as acts of free speech. In each case study, he questions whether the meaning of speech has been expanded too far and critically assesses the Supreme Court's methodology in reaching and explaining its expansive conclusions"-- Provided by publisher. -- "In this project Randall Bezanson examines judicial interpretations of free speech by means of a broad range of Supreme Court cases, arguing that over the past 15 years the Court has engaged in a truly revolutionary expansion of the reach of the free speech guarantee. The cases include the much-discussed Citizens United decision which granted the full measure of constitutional protection to speech by corporations; the Doe v. Reed case from Washington State that recognized the acts of signing petitions and voting in elections as acts of free speech; the Summum decision holding that the decision to select a monument for a public park and to reject another based on the government's disagreement with the monument's message is an act of government speech immunized from challenge by the First Amendment; and the Hurley and Dale cases that recognized free speech claims for messages and meanings that arose "out of thin air": speech without an aut |
| Beschreibung: | 266 S. |
| ISBN: | 9780252037115 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV040635435 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20130508 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 121217s2012 xxu ||||z00||| eng d | ||
| 010 | |a 2012022919 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780252037115 |c hardback |9 978-0-252-03711-5 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)812383038 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV040635435 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a xxu |c US | ||
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-188 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a KF4772 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 342.730853 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Bezanson, Randall P. |d 1946- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)132518287 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Too much free speech? |c Randall P. Bezanson |
| 264 | 1 | |a Urbana [u.a.] |b Univ. of Illinois Press |c 2012 | |
| 300 | |a 266 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a "Randall P. Bezanson takes up an essential and timely inquiry into the Constitutional limits of the Supreme Court's power to create, interpret, and enforce one of the essential rights of American citizens. Analyzing contemporary Supreme Court decisions from the past fifteen years, Bezanson argues that judicial interpretations have fundamentally and drastically expanded the meaning and understanding of "speech." Bezanson focuses on judgments such as the much-discussed Citizens United case, which granted the full measure of constitutional protection to speech by corporations, and the Doe vs. Reed case in Washington state, which recognized the signing of petitions and voting in elections as acts of free speech. In each case study, he questions whether the meaning of speech has been expanded too far and critically assesses the Supreme Court's methodology in reaching and explaining its expansive conclusions"-- Provided by publisher. -- "In this project Randall Bezanson examines judicial interpretations of free speech by means of a broad range of Supreme Court cases, arguing that over the past 15 years the Court has engaged in a truly revolutionary expansion of the reach of the free speech guarantee. The cases include the much-discussed Citizens United decision which granted the full measure of constitutional protection to speech by corporations; the Doe v. Reed case from Washington State that recognized the acts of signing petitions and voting in elections as acts of free speech; the Summum decision holding that the decision to select a monument for a public park and to reject another based on the government's disagreement with the monument's message is an act of government speech immunized from challenge by the First Amendment; and the Hurley and Dale cases that recognized free speech claims for messages and meanings that arose "out of thin air": speech without an aut | ||
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a USA |b Supreme Court |0 (DE-588)35650-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 648 | 7 | |a Geschichte 1995-2010 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Freedom of speech |z United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Freedom of speech |z United States |v Cases | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW / Constitutional |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Communication Studies |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 7 | |a POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Freedom & Security / Civil Rights |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Gerichtsentscheidung |0 (DE-588)4138783-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Redefreiheit |0 (DE-588)4177296-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 4 | |a USA | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a USA |b Supreme Court |0 (DE-588)35650-5 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Redefreiheit |0 (DE-588)4177296-9 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Gerichtsentscheidung |0 (DE-588)4138783-1 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Geschichte 1995-2010 |A z |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-025462602 | ||
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |f 09049 |g 73 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |f 090511 |g 73 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804149748091846656 |
|---|---|
| any_adam_object | |
| author | Bezanson, Randall P. 1946- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)132518287 |
| author_facet | Bezanson, Randall P. 1946- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Bezanson, Randall P. 1946- |
| author_variant | r p b rp rpb |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV040635435 |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | KF4772 |
| callnumber-raw | KF4772 |
| callnumber-search | KF4772 |
| callnumber-sort | KF 44772 |
| callnumber-subject | KF - United States |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)812383038 (DE-599)BVBBV040635435 |
| dewey-full | 342.730853 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 342 - Constitutional and administrative law |
| dewey-raw | 342.730853 |
| dewey-search | 342.730853 |
| dewey-sort | 3342.730853 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| era | Geschichte 1995-2010 gnd |
| era_facet | Geschichte 1995-2010 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03663nam a2200517zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV040635435</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20130508 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">121217s2012 xxu ||||z00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2012022919</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780252037115</subfield><subfield code="c">hardback</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-252-03711-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)812383038</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV040635435</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxu</subfield><subfield code="c">US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KF4772</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">342.730853</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bezanson, Randall P.</subfield><subfield code="d">1946-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)132518287</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Too much free speech?</subfield><subfield code="c">Randall P. Bezanson</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Urbana [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Univ. of Illinois Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">266 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Randall P. Bezanson takes up an essential and timely inquiry into the Constitutional limits of the Supreme Court's power to create, interpret, and enforce one of the essential rights of American citizens. Analyzing contemporary Supreme Court decisions from the past fifteen years, Bezanson argues that judicial interpretations have fundamentally and drastically expanded the meaning and understanding of "speech." Bezanson focuses on judgments such as the much-discussed Citizens United case, which granted the full measure of constitutional protection to speech by corporations, and the Doe vs. Reed case in Washington state, which recognized the signing of petitions and voting in elections as acts of free speech. In each case study, he questions whether the meaning of speech has been expanded too far and critically assesses the Supreme Court's methodology in reaching and explaining its expansive conclusions"-- Provided by publisher. -- "In this project Randall Bezanson examines judicial interpretations of free speech by means of a broad range of Supreme Court cases, arguing that over the past 15 years the Court has engaged in a truly revolutionary expansion of the reach of the free speech guarantee. The cases include the much-discussed Citizens United decision which granted the full measure of constitutional protection to speech by corporations; the Doe v. Reed case from Washington State that recognized the acts of signing petitions and voting in elections as acts of free speech; the Summum decision holding that the decision to select a monument for a public park and to reject another based on the government's disagreement with the monument's message is an act of government speech immunized from challenge by the First Amendment; and the Hurley and Dale cases that recognized free speech claims for messages and meanings that arose "out of thin air": speech without an aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)35650-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1995-2010</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Freedom of speech</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Freedom of speech</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="v">Cases</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW / Constitutional</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Communication Studies</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Freedom & Security / Civil Rights</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gerichtsentscheidung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4138783-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Redefreiheit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4177296-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)35650-5</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Redefreiheit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4177296-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Gerichtsentscheidung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4138783-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1995-2010</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-025462602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09049</subfield><subfield code="g">73</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090511</subfield><subfield code="g">73</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | USA |
| geographic_facet | USA |
| id | DE-604.BV040635435 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T00:27:57Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780252037115 |
| language | English |
| lccn | 2012022919 |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-025462602 |
| oclc_num | 812383038 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-188 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-188 |
| physical | 266 S. |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| publishDateSearch | 2012 |
| publishDateSort | 2012 |
| publisher | Univ. of Illinois Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Bezanson, Randall P. 1946- Verfasser (DE-588)132518287 aut Too much free speech? Randall P. Bezanson Urbana [u.a.] Univ. of Illinois Press 2012 266 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier "Randall P. Bezanson takes up an essential and timely inquiry into the Constitutional limits of the Supreme Court's power to create, interpret, and enforce one of the essential rights of American citizens. Analyzing contemporary Supreme Court decisions from the past fifteen years, Bezanson argues that judicial interpretations have fundamentally and drastically expanded the meaning and understanding of "speech." Bezanson focuses on judgments such as the much-discussed Citizens United case, which granted the full measure of constitutional protection to speech by corporations, and the Doe vs. Reed case in Washington state, which recognized the signing of petitions and voting in elections as acts of free speech. In each case study, he questions whether the meaning of speech has been expanded too far and critically assesses the Supreme Court's methodology in reaching and explaining its expansive conclusions"-- Provided by publisher. -- "In this project Randall Bezanson examines judicial interpretations of free speech by means of a broad range of Supreme Court cases, arguing that over the past 15 years the Court has engaged in a truly revolutionary expansion of the reach of the free speech guarantee. The cases include the much-discussed Citizens United decision which granted the full measure of constitutional protection to speech by corporations; the Doe v. Reed case from Washington State that recognized the acts of signing petitions and voting in elections as acts of free speech; the Summum decision holding that the decision to select a monument for a public park and to reject another based on the government's disagreement with the monument's message is an act of government speech immunized from challenge by the First Amendment; and the Hurley and Dale cases that recognized free speech claims for messages and meanings that arose "out of thin air": speech without an aut USA Supreme Court (DE-588)35650-5 gnd rswk-swf Geschichte 1995-2010 gnd rswk-swf Freedom of speech United States Freedom of speech United States Cases LAW / Constitutional bisacsh LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Communication Studies bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Freedom & Security / Civil Rights bisacsh Gerichtsentscheidung (DE-588)4138783-1 gnd rswk-swf Redefreiheit (DE-588)4177296-9 gnd rswk-swf USA USA Supreme Court (DE-588)35650-5 b Redefreiheit (DE-588)4177296-9 s Gerichtsentscheidung (DE-588)4138783-1 s Geschichte 1995-2010 z DE-604 |
| spellingShingle | Bezanson, Randall P. 1946- Too much free speech? USA Supreme Court (DE-588)35650-5 gnd Freedom of speech United States Freedom of speech United States Cases LAW / Constitutional bisacsh LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Communication Studies bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Freedom & Security / Civil Rights bisacsh Gerichtsentscheidung (DE-588)4138783-1 gnd Redefreiheit (DE-588)4177296-9 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)35650-5 (DE-588)4138783-1 (DE-588)4177296-9 |
| title | Too much free speech? |
| title_auth | Too much free speech? |
| title_exact_search | Too much free speech? |
| title_full | Too much free speech? Randall P. Bezanson |
| title_fullStr | Too much free speech? Randall P. Bezanson |
| title_full_unstemmed | Too much free speech? Randall P. Bezanson |
| title_short | Too much free speech? |
| title_sort | too much free speech |
| topic | USA Supreme Court (DE-588)35650-5 gnd Freedom of speech United States Freedom of speech United States Cases LAW / Constitutional bisacsh LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Communication Studies bisacsh POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Freedom & Security / Civil Rights bisacsh Gerichtsentscheidung (DE-588)4138783-1 gnd Redefreiheit (DE-588)4177296-9 gnd |
| topic_facet | USA Supreme Court Freedom of speech United States Freedom of speech United States Cases LAW / Constitutional LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Communication Studies POLITICAL SCIENCE / Political Freedom & Security / Civil Rights Gerichtsentscheidung Redefreiheit USA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bezansonrandallp toomuchfreespeech |