Economic policy responses to preference erosion: from trade as aid to aid for trade
"Trade preferences are a central issue in ongoing efforts to negotiate further multilateral trade liberalization. "Less preferred" countries are increasingly concerned about the discrimination they confront, while "more preferred" developing countries worry that WTO-based li...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
[Washington, D.C]
World Bank
2005
|
Schriftenreihe: | Policy research working paper
3721 |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | "Trade preferences are a central issue in ongoing efforts to negotiate further multilateral trade liberalization. "Less preferred" countries are increasingly concerned about the discrimination they confront, while "more preferred" developing countries worry that WTO-based liberalization of trade will erode the value of current preferential access regimes. This tension suggests there is a political economy case for preference-granting countries to explicitly address erosion fears. The authors argue that the appropriate instrument for this is development assistance. The alternative of addressing erosion concerns through the trading system will generate additional discrimination and trade distortions, rather than moving the WTO toward a more liberal, non-discriminatory regime. They further argue that prospective losses generated by most-favored-nation liberalization should be quantified on a bilateral basis, using methods that estimate what the associated transfer should have been and ignoring the various factors that reduce their value in practice (such as compliance costs or the fact that part of the rents created by preference programs accrue to importers in OECD countries). Given that many poor countries have not been able to benefit much from preference programs, a case is also made that preference erosion should be considered as part of a broader response by OECD countries to calls to make the trading system more supportive of economic development. The focus should be on identifying actions and policy measures that will improve the ability of developing countries to use trade for development. "--World Bank web site |
Beschreibung: | Includes bibliographical references. - Title from PDF file as viewed on 9/19/2005 Erscheinungsjahr in Vorlageform:[2005] Weitere Ausgabe: Hoekman, Bernard M: Economic policy responses to preference erosion |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (30 Seiten) |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV040618326 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20241112 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 121206s2005 xxu o|||| 00||| eng d | ||
035 | |a (ZDB-1-WBA)093222734 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)874233764 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)GBVNLM005458889 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
044 | |a xxu |c XD-US | ||
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-1102 |a DE-1051 |a DE-521 |a DE-863 |a DE-862 |a DE-522 |a DE-858 |a DE-573 |a DE-860 |a DE-1046 |a DE-1047 |a DE-Aug4 |a DE-2070s |a DE-M347 |a DE-1049 |a DE-898 |a DE-128 |a DE-M352 |a DE-70 |a DE-92 |a DE-150 |a DE-155 |a DE-22 |a DE-91 |a DE-384 |a DE-473 |a DE-19 |a DE-739 |a DE-20 |a DE-703 |a DE-706 |a DE-355 |a DE-29 |a DE-859 |a DE-Re13 |a DE-523 | ||
050 | 0 | |a HG3881.5.W57 | |
100 | 1 | |a Hoekman, Bernard M. |d 1959- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)124833691 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Economic policy responses to preference erosion |b from trade as aid to aid for trade |
264 | 1 | |a [Washington, D.C] |b World Bank |c 2005 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (30 Seiten) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a Policy research working paper |v 3721 | |
500 | |a Includes bibliographical references. - Title from PDF file as viewed on 9/19/2005 | ||
500 | |a Erscheinungsjahr in Vorlageform:[2005] | ||
500 | |a Weitere Ausgabe: Hoekman, Bernard M: Economic policy responses to preference erosion | ||
520 | 1 | |a "Trade preferences are a central issue in ongoing efforts to negotiate further multilateral trade liberalization. "Less preferred" countries are increasingly concerned about the discrimination they confront, while "more preferred" developing countries worry that WTO-based liberalization of trade will erode the value of current preferential access regimes. This tension suggests there is a political economy case for preference-granting countries to explicitly address erosion fears. The authors argue that the appropriate instrument for this is development assistance. The alternative of addressing erosion concerns through the trading system will generate additional discrimination and trade distortions, rather than moving the WTO toward a more liberal, non-discriminatory regime. They further argue that prospective losses generated by most-favored-nation liberalization should be quantified on a bilateral basis, using methods that estimate what the associated transfer should have been and ignoring the various factors that reduce their value in practice (such as compliance costs or the fact that part of the rents created by preference programs accrue to importers in OECD countries). Given that many poor countries have not been able to benefit much from preference programs, a case is also made that preference erosion should be considered as part of a broader response by OECD countries to calls to make the trading system more supportive of economic development. The focus should be on identifying actions and policy measures that will improve the ability of developing countries to use trade for development. "--World Bank web site | |
534 | |c 2005 | ||
653 | |a Economic assistance | ||
653 | |a Free trade | ||
653 | |a Tariff preferences | ||
653 | |a World Trade Organization | ||
710 | 2 | |a World Bank |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Reproduktion von |a Hoekman, Bernard M. |t Economic policy responses to preference erosion |d 2005 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://elibrary.worldbank.org/content/workingpaper/10.1596/1813-9450-3721 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-1-WBA | ||
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-025445825 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
DE-BY-FWS_katkey | 461035 |
---|---|
_version_ | 1815574562589376512 |
adam_text | |
any_adam_object | |
author | Hoekman, Bernard M. 1959- |
author_GND | (DE-588)124833691 |
author_facet | Hoekman, Bernard M. 1959- |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Hoekman, Bernard M. 1959- |
author_variant | b m h bm bmh |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV040618326 |
callnumber-first | H - Social Science |
callnumber-label | HG3881 |
callnumber-raw | HG3881.5.W57 |
callnumber-search | HG3881.5.W57 |
callnumber-sort | HG 43881.5 W57 |
callnumber-subject | HG - Finance |
collection | ZDB-1-WBA |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-1-WBA)093222734 (OCoLC)874233764 (DE-599)GBVNLM005458889 |
discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV040618326</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20241112</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">121206s2005 xxu o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-1-WBA)093222734</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)874233764</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBVNLM005458889</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxu</subfield><subfield code="c">XD-US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1102</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1051</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-863</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-862</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-522</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-858</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-573</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-860</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1046</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1047</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-Aug4</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-2070s</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-M347</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1049</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-898</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-128</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-M352</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-70</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-92</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-150</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-155</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-22</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-706</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-859</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-Re13</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-523</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HG3881.5.W57</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hoekman, Bernard M.</subfield><subfield code="d">1959-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)124833691</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Economic policy responses to preference erosion</subfield><subfield code="b">from trade as aid to aid for trade</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">[Washington, D.C]</subfield><subfield code="b">World Bank</subfield><subfield code="c">2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (30 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Policy research working paper</subfield><subfield code="v">3721</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references. - Title from PDF file as viewed on 9/19/2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Erscheinungsjahr in Vorlageform:[2005]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Weitere Ausgabe: Hoekman, Bernard M: Economic policy responses to preference erosion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Trade preferences are a central issue in ongoing efforts to negotiate further multilateral trade liberalization. "Less preferred" countries are increasingly concerned about the discrimination they confront, while "more preferred" developing countries worry that WTO-based liberalization of trade will erode the value of current preferential access regimes. This tension suggests there is a political economy case for preference-granting countries to explicitly address erosion fears. The authors argue that the appropriate instrument for this is development assistance. The alternative of addressing erosion concerns through the trading system will generate additional discrimination and trade distortions, rather than moving the WTO toward a more liberal, non-discriminatory regime. They further argue that prospective losses generated by most-favored-nation liberalization should be quantified on a bilateral basis, using methods that estimate what the associated transfer should have been and ignoring the various factors that reduce their value in practice (such as compliance costs or the fact that part of the rents created by preference programs accrue to importers in OECD countries). Given that many poor countries have not been able to benefit much from preference programs, a case is also made that preference erosion should be considered as part of a broader response by OECD countries to calls to make the trading system more supportive of economic development. The focus should be on identifying actions and policy measures that will improve the ability of developing countries to use trade for development. "--World Bank web site</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="534" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="c">2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Economic assistance</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Free trade</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tariff preferences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">World Trade Organization</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">World Bank</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Reproduktion von</subfield><subfield code="a">Hoekman, Bernard M.</subfield><subfield code="t">Economic policy responses to preference erosion</subfield><subfield code="d">2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">http://elibrary.worldbank.org/content/workingpaper/10.1596/1813-9450-3721</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-1-WBA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-025445825</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV040618326 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-11-13T04:00:29Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-025445825 |
oclc_num | 874233764 |
open_access_boolean | 1 |
owner | DE-12 DE-1102 DE-1051 DE-521 DE-863 DE-BY-FWS DE-862 DE-BY-FWS DE-522 DE-858 DE-573 DE-860 DE-1046 DE-1047 DE-Aug4 DE-2070s DE-M347 DE-1049 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-128 DE-M352 DE-70 DE-92 DE-150 DE-155 DE-BY-UBR DE-22 DE-BY-UBG DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-384 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-739 DE-20 DE-703 DE-706 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-29 DE-859 DE-Re13 DE-BY-UBR DE-523 |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-1102 DE-1051 DE-521 DE-863 DE-BY-FWS DE-862 DE-BY-FWS DE-522 DE-858 DE-573 DE-860 DE-1046 DE-1047 DE-Aug4 DE-2070s DE-M347 DE-1049 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-128 DE-M352 DE-70 DE-92 DE-150 DE-155 DE-BY-UBR DE-22 DE-BY-UBG DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-384 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-739 DE-20 DE-703 DE-706 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-29 DE-859 DE-Re13 DE-BY-UBR DE-523 |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (30 Seiten) |
psigel | ZDB-1-WBA |
publishDate | 2005 |
publishDateSearch | 2005 |
publishDateSort | 2005 |
publisher | World Bank |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Policy research working paper |
spellingShingle | Hoekman, Bernard M. 1959- Economic policy responses to preference erosion from trade as aid to aid for trade |
title | Economic policy responses to preference erosion from trade as aid to aid for trade |
title_auth | Economic policy responses to preference erosion from trade as aid to aid for trade |
title_exact_search | Economic policy responses to preference erosion from trade as aid to aid for trade |
title_full | Economic policy responses to preference erosion from trade as aid to aid for trade |
title_fullStr | Economic policy responses to preference erosion from trade as aid to aid for trade |
title_full_unstemmed | Economic policy responses to preference erosion from trade as aid to aid for trade |
title_short | Economic policy responses to preference erosion |
title_sort | economic policy responses to preference erosion from trade as aid to aid for trade |
title_sub | from trade as aid to aid for trade |
url | http://elibrary.worldbank.org/content/workingpaper/10.1596/1813-9450-3721 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hoekmanbernardm economicpolicyresponsestopreferenceerosionfromtradeasaidtoaidfortrade AT worldbank economicpolicyresponsestopreferenceerosionfromtradeasaidtoaidfortrade |