Legal responses to religious practices in the United States: accomodation and its limits
Gespeichert in:
Format: | Buch |
---|---|
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge [u.a.]
Cambridge Univ. Press
2012
|
Ausgabe: | 1. publ. |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Cover image Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Beschreibung: | "There is an enormous scholarly literature on law's treatment of religion. Most scholars now recognize that although the U.S. Supreme Court has not offered a consistent interpretation of what 'non-establishment' or religious freedom means, as a general matter it can be said that the First Amendment requires that government not give preference to one religion over another or, although this is more controversial, to religion over non-belief. But these rules raise questions that will be addressed in Legal Responses to Religious Practices in the United States: namely, what practices constitute a 'religious activity' such that it cannot be supported or funded by government? And what is a religion, anyway? How should law understand matters of faith and accommodate religious practices?"-- Provided by publisher. -- "There is an enormous scholarly literature on law's treatment of religion. Most scholars now recognize that although the U.S. Supreme Court has not offered a consistent interpretation of what "non-establishment" or religious freedom means, as a general matter it can be said that the First Amendment requires that government not give preference to one religion over another or, although this is more controversial, to religion over non-belief. But these rules raise questions that will be addressed in Legal Responses to Religious Practices in the United States: Namely, what practices constitute a "religious activity" such that it cannot be supported or funded by government? And what is a religion, anyway? How should law understand matters of faith and accommodate religious practices?"-- Provided by publisher. Includes bibliographical references and index |
Beschreibung: | XI, 311 S. |
ISBN: | 9781107023680 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV040495153 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20170510 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 121022s2012 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
010 | |a 2012025230 | ||
020 | |a 9781107023680 |c hardback |9 978-1-10-702368-0 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)816287939 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV040495153 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 | ||
050 | 0 | |a KF4783 | |
082 | 0 | |a 342.7308/52 | |
084 | |a PL 732 |0 (DE-625)137268: |2 rvk | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Legal responses to religious practices in the United States |b accomodation and its limits |c ed. by Austin Sarat |
250 | |a 1. publ. | ||
264 | 1 | |a Cambridge [u.a.] |b Cambridge Univ. Press |c 2012 | |
300 | |a XI, 311 S. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a "There is an enormous scholarly literature on law's treatment of religion. Most scholars now recognize that although the U.S. Supreme Court has not offered a consistent interpretation of what 'non-establishment' or religious freedom means, as a general matter it can be said that the First Amendment requires that government not give preference to one religion over another or, although this is more controversial, to religion over non-belief. But these rules raise questions that will be addressed in Legal Responses to Religious Practices in the United States: namely, what practices constitute a 'religious activity' such that it cannot be supported or funded by government? And what is a religion, anyway? How should law understand matters of faith and accommodate religious practices?"-- Provided by publisher. -- "There is an enormous scholarly literature on law's treatment of religion. Most scholars now recognize that although the U.S. Supreme Court has not offered a consistent interpretation of what "non-establishment" or religious freedom means, as a general matter it can be said that the First Amendment requires that government not give preference to one religion over another or, although this is more controversial, to religion over non-belief. But these rules raise questions that will be addressed in Legal Responses to Religious Practices in the United States: Namely, what practices constitute a "religious activity" such that it cannot be supported or funded by government? And what is a religion, anyway? How should law understand matters of faith and accommodate religious practices?"-- Provided by publisher. | ||
500 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index | ||
650 | 4 | |a Freedom of religion |z United States | |
650 | 7 | |a LAW / General |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Recht |0 (DE-588)4048737-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Religionsfreiheit |0 (DE-588)4125186-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
651 | 4 | |a USA | |
651 | 7 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)1071861417 |a Konferenzschrift |y 2011 |z Tuscaloosa, Ala. |2 gnd-content | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |D g |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Religionsfreiheit |0 (DE-588)4125186-6 |D s |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Recht |0 (DE-588)4048737-4 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
700 | 1 | |a Sarat, Austin |d 1947- |e Sonstige |0 (DE-588)14156301X |4 oth | |
856 | 4 | |u http://assets.cambridge.org/97811070/23680/cover/9781107023680.jpg |3 Cover image | |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m LoC Fremddatenuebernahme |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025342059&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-025342059 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1812973841879662592 |
---|---|
adam_text |
LEGAL RESPONSES TO RELIGIOUS PRACTICES IN THE UNITED STATES
/ SARAT, AUSTIN
: 2012
TABLE OF CONTENTS / INHALTSVERZEICHNIS
1. A HISTORY OF AMBIVALENCE: HOW RELIGION AND U.S. LAW HAVE DEVELOPED
TOGETHER AMANDA PORTERFIELD; 2. COMMENTARY ON RELIGION'S ACCOMMODATION
TO AMERICAN LAW AND CULTURE TIMOTHY HOFF; 3. AGAINST NEUTRALISM: FAITH
BASED GROUPS, DISCRIMINATION, AND STATE SUBSIDY COREY BRETTSCHNEIDER; 4.
COMMENTARY ON FREEDOM OF SPEECH, EQUAL CITIZENSHIP, AND THE ANTI-CASTE
PRINCIPLE: A COMMENTARY ON REGULATING HATE SPEECH BRYAN FAIR; 5.
EXPANDING THE BOB JONES COMPROMISE CAROLINE MALA CORBIN; 6. COMMENTARY
ON RELIGIOUS PRACTICE AND SEX DISCRIMINATION: A CASE FOR TOLERATION?
MEREDITH RENDER; 7. RELIGIOUS FREEDOM AND THE NONDISCRIMINATION NORM
RICHARD W. GARNETT; 8. COMMENTARY ON RELIGIOUS FREEDOM AND THE
NONDISCRIMINATION NORM PAUL HORWITZ; 9. FREEDOM OF RELIGION OR FREEDOM
OF THE CHURCH? STEVEN D. SMITH; 10. COMMENTARY ON GOVERNMENT FOR THE
TIME BEING WILLIAM BREWBAKER.
DIESES SCHRIFTSTUECK WURDE MASCHINELL ERZEUGT. |
any_adam_object | 1 |
author_GND | (DE-588)14156301X |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV040495153 |
callnumber-first | K - Law |
callnumber-label | KF4783 |
callnumber-raw | KF4783 |
callnumber-search | KF4783 |
callnumber-sort | KF 44783 |
callnumber-subject | KF - United States |
classification_rvk | PL 732 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)816287939 (DE-599)BVBBV040495153 |
dewey-full | 342.7308/52 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 342 - Constitutional and administrative law |
dewey-raw | 342.7308/52 |
dewey-search | 342.7308/52 |
dewey-sort | 3342.7308 252 |
dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
edition | 1. publ. |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV040495153</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20170510</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">121022s2012 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2012025230</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781107023680</subfield><subfield code="c">hardback</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-10-702368-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)816287939</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV040495153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KF4783</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">342.7308/52</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PL 732</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)137268:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Legal responses to religious practices in the United States</subfield><subfield code="b">accomodation and its limits</subfield><subfield code="c">ed. by Austin Sarat</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1. publ.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge Univ. Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XI, 311 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"There is an enormous scholarly literature on law's treatment of religion. Most scholars now recognize that although the U.S. Supreme Court has not offered a consistent interpretation of what 'non-establishment' or religious freedom means, as a general matter it can be said that the First Amendment requires that government not give preference to one religion over another or, although this is more controversial, to religion over non-belief. But these rules raise questions that will be addressed in Legal Responses to Religious Practices in the United States: namely, what practices constitute a 'religious activity' such that it cannot be supported or funded by government? And what is a religion, anyway? How should law understand matters of faith and accommodate religious practices?"-- Provided by publisher. -- "There is an enormous scholarly literature on law's treatment of religion. Most scholars now recognize that although the U.S. Supreme Court has not offered a consistent interpretation of what "non-establishment" or religious freedom means, as a general matter it can be said that the First Amendment requires that government not give preference to one religion over another or, although this is more controversial, to religion over non-belief. But these rules raise questions that will be addressed in Legal Responses to Religious Practices in the United States: Namely, what practices constitute a "religious activity" such that it cannot be supported or funded by government? And what is a religion, anyway? How should law understand matters of faith and accommodate religious practices?"-- Provided by publisher.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Freedom of religion</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW / General</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Recht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048737-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Religionsfreiheit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4125186-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1071861417</subfield><subfield code="a">Konferenzschrift</subfield><subfield code="y">2011</subfield><subfield code="z">Tuscaloosa, Ala.</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Religionsfreiheit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4125186-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Recht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048737-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sarat, Austin</subfield><subfield code="d">1947-</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)14156301X</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://assets.cambridge.org/97811070/23680/cover/9781107023680.jpg</subfield><subfield code="3">Cover image</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">LoC Fremddatenuebernahme</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025342059&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-025342059</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
genre | (DE-588)1071861417 Konferenzschrift 2011 Tuscaloosa, Ala. gnd-content |
genre_facet | Konferenzschrift 2011 Tuscaloosa, Ala. |
geographic | USA USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd |
geographic_facet | USA |
id | DE-604.BV040495153 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-10-15T10:03:08Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9781107023680 |
language | English |
lccn | 2012025230 |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-025342059 |
oclc_num | 816287939 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 |
owner_facet | DE-12 |
physical | XI, 311 S. |
publishDate | 2012 |
publishDateSearch | 2012 |
publishDateSort | 2012 |
publisher | Cambridge Univ. Press |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Legal responses to religious practices in the United States accomodation and its limits ed. by Austin Sarat 1. publ. Cambridge [u.a.] Cambridge Univ. Press 2012 XI, 311 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier "There is an enormous scholarly literature on law's treatment of religion. Most scholars now recognize that although the U.S. Supreme Court has not offered a consistent interpretation of what 'non-establishment' or religious freedom means, as a general matter it can be said that the First Amendment requires that government not give preference to one religion over another or, although this is more controversial, to religion over non-belief. But these rules raise questions that will be addressed in Legal Responses to Religious Practices in the United States: namely, what practices constitute a 'religious activity' such that it cannot be supported or funded by government? And what is a religion, anyway? How should law understand matters of faith and accommodate religious practices?"-- Provided by publisher. -- "There is an enormous scholarly literature on law's treatment of religion. Most scholars now recognize that although the U.S. Supreme Court has not offered a consistent interpretation of what "non-establishment" or religious freedom means, as a general matter it can be said that the First Amendment requires that government not give preference to one religion over another or, although this is more controversial, to religion over non-belief. But these rules raise questions that will be addressed in Legal Responses to Religious Practices in the United States: Namely, what practices constitute a "religious activity" such that it cannot be supported or funded by government? And what is a religion, anyway? How should law understand matters of faith and accommodate religious practices?"-- Provided by publisher. Includes bibliographical references and index Freedom of religion United States LAW / General bisacsh Recht (DE-588)4048737-4 gnd rswk-swf Religionsfreiheit (DE-588)4125186-6 gnd rswk-swf USA USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd rswk-swf (DE-588)1071861417 Konferenzschrift 2011 Tuscaloosa, Ala. gnd-content USA (DE-588)4078704-7 g Religionsfreiheit (DE-588)4125186-6 s Recht (DE-588)4048737-4 s DE-604 Sarat, Austin 1947- Sonstige (DE-588)14156301X oth http://assets.cambridge.org/97811070/23680/cover/9781107023680.jpg Cover image LoC Fremddatenuebernahme application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025342059&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
spellingShingle | Legal responses to religious practices in the United States accomodation and its limits Freedom of religion United States LAW / General bisacsh Recht (DE-588)4048737-4 gnd Religionsfreiheit (DE-588)4125186-6 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4048737-4 (DE-588)4125186-6 (DE-588)4078704-7 (DE-588)1071861417 |
title | Legal responses to religious practices in the United States accomodation and its limits |
title_auth | Legal responses to religious practices in the United States accomodation and its limits |
title_exact_search | Legal responses to religious practices in the United States accomodation and its limits |
title_full | Legal responses to religious practices in the United States accomodation and its limits ed. by Austin Sarat |
title_fullStr | Legal responses to religious practices in the United States accomodation and its limits ed. by Austin Sarat |
title_full_unstemmed | Legal responses to religious practices in the United States accomodation and its limits ed. by Austin Sarat |
title_short | Legal responses to religious practices in the United States |
title_sort | legal responses to religious practices in the united states accomodation and its limits |
title_sub | accomodation and its limits |
topic | Freedom of religion United States LAW / General bisacsh Recht (DE-588)4048737-4 gnd Religionsfreiheit (DE-588)4125186-6 gnd |
topic_facet | Freedom of religion United States LAW / General Recht Religionsfreiheit USA Konferenzschrift 2011 Tuscaloosa, Ala. |
url | http://assets.cambridge.org/97811070/23680/cover/9781107023680.jpg http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025342059&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sarataustin legalresponsestoreligiouspracticesintheunitedstatesaccomodationanditslimits |