U źródeł megalityzmu w kulturze pucharów lejkowatych:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | Polish |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Łódź
Instytut Archeologii Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
2011
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Spatium Archaeologicum
3 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Abstract |
| Beschreibung: | Zsfassung in engl. Sprache u.d.T.: At the sources of megalithism in the TRB culture Bibliogr. s. 175-189 |
| Beschreibung: | 195 s., [5] k. tabl. złoż. Ill., Kt. 31 cm |
| ISBN: | 9788392888772 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV040409681 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20200417 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 120910s2011 ab|| |||| 00||| pol d | ||
| 020 | |a 9788392888772 |9 978-83-928887-7-2 | ||
| 020 | |z 8392888774 |9 8392888774 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)780379455 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV040409681 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a pol | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a 6,11 |2 ssgn | ||
| 084 | |a 7,41 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Rzepecki, Seweryn |d 1974- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1180058380 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a U źródeł megalityzmu w kulturze pucharów lejkowatych |c Seweryn Rzepecki ; Instytut Archeologii Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Fundacja Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego |
| 264 | 1 | |a Łódź |b Instytut Archeologii Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego |c 2011 | |
| 300 | |a 195 s., [5] k. tabl. złoż. |b Ill., Kt. |c 31 cm | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Spatium Archaeologicum |v 3 | |
| 500 | |a Zsfassung in engl. Sprache u.d.T.: At the sources of megalithism in the TRB culture | ||
| 500 | |a Bibliogr. s. 175-189 | ||
| 650 | 7 | |a Kultura pucharów lejkowatych |2 jhpk | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Zabytki megalityczne |2 jhpk | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Groby prehistoryczne |2 jhpk | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Grab |0 (DE-588)4021716-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Megalithkultur |0 (DE-588)4038344-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Trichterbecherkultur |0 (DE-588)4186075-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Trichterbecherkultur |0 (DE-588)4186075-5 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Megalithkultur |0 (DE-588)4038344-1 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Grab |0 (DE-588)4021716-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 830 | 0 | |a Spatium Archaeologicum |v 3 |w (DE-604)BV039576110 |9 3 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 2 |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025262673&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025262673&sequence=000006&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Abstract |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-025262673 | ||
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 930.1 |e 22/bsb |f 0901 |g 438 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 930.1 |e 22/bsb |f 0901 |g 4 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804149463120347136 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | Spis
tresei
Od
redakcji
................................................................... 9
Zagadnienia wstępne
............................................................ 11
1.
Grobowce kultury pucharów lejkowatych typu Niedźwiedź
—
specyfikacja informacji źródłowych
. . 15
2.
Grobowce typu Niedźwiedź na tle grobowców bezkomorowych kultury pucharów lejkowatych
... 79
3.
Egzogenne analogie grobowców typu Niedźwiedź
.................................... 123
4.
Megalityzm a geneza grobowców typu Niedźwiedź
................................... 149
5.
Podsumowanie. Etap formatywny megalityzmu na tle epoki
............................ 171
Zakończenie
.................................................................. 173
Bibliografia
................................................................... 175
Summary
..................................................................... 191
Summary
At the sources of megalithism in the TRB culture
The aim of the present dissertation is an attempt
at showing processes connected with the initiation
of tradition of megalithic monuments raising. Be¬
fore the proper part of the reasoning some remarks
of ordering character are necessary.
In the first place, an attention will be paid
on the title megalithism. It is undoubtedly one
of the most interesting phenomena of prehistory.
Multitude of problems connected with the gene¬
sis, chronology, religious and social meaning of
megaliths causes unabated interest of successive
generations of archaeologists. The term megali¬
thism was first used in a paper of an English an¬
tiquarian Algernon Herbert
(1792-1855)
entitled
Cyclops
Christianus:
Or an Argument to Disprove
the Supposed Antiquity of the Stonehenge and
Other Megalithic Erections [Herbert
1849: 19],
to designate monuments made of big stones (from
Greek:
megas
—
great, lithos
-
stone). For consoli¬
dation of this term congresses of prehistory were
most significant, which were held in
1867
in Paris
and in
1874
in Stockholm. On this latter occasion
Oskar Montelius
formulated a proposal of mega¬
liths division, which became the foundation of fu¬
ture scientific research
[Pingel
1999: 39-40].
It is worth to remind the above mentioned
facts to realize that megalithism or megalith are
most of all effects of the 19th century attempts at
systematization of archaeological material [Czer-
niak
1994: 132].
However, as far as it was under¬
standable on such an early stage of archaeology
development, nowadays it must raise reasonable
concerns. Therefore, it is necessary to formulate
an answer to a question: whether nowadays mega¬
liths are only
a
taxonomie
term or rather epiphe-
nomenon of real cultural phenomenon?
Both above mentioned alternatives are justified.
Problems arise when discreet transition between
both states oceans
-
surface structure (taxonomy)
and deep structure (interpretation). It is just when
each stone monument is interpreted as an effect
of the global net of cultural connections exist¬
ence. Above, linguistic structuralism was referred
to (deep structure
-
surface structure) not without
reason. As it is known since the time of Ferdinand
de Saussure,
signs are of quite conventional char¬
acter, the unity of form is out of keeping with the
unity of meaning [e.g.
Eco
2009: 53-73].
Inter¬
pretation of their meaning is only possible through
taking the statement context into consideration
[cf.
Hodder
1995].
The awareness of this must result
in rejection of such simple associations as: stone
—
megalithism and such archaic use of raw mate¬
rial criteria for historic phenomena interpretation.
Here a conclusion appears. The presence of
stone material cannot serve as either necessary or
sufficient condition for classification of any monu¬
ments as megaliths
[cf.
Hodder
1984;
Sherrat
1990; 1999;
Midgley
2005: 77-78; 2008: 23-25].
On accepting the above, structures built with the
use of various materials and techniques, for which
a specially characteristic feature was monumental-
ism of form will be defined as megaliths
[Veit 1999:
412-418].
This gets the discussed understanding of
megaliths closer to sometimes used by Anglo-Saxon
researchers term monumental funerary tradition
[further: Midgley
2008: 24].
What is important, on
considering megaliths as epiphenomenon of reli¬
gious, cultural and social phenomenon, which was
megalithism, the range of the latter is limited to the
areas of Europe and neighbouring parts of Africa
and Asia and the period
с
4900-2000
ВС.
There
is probably no need to explain that the use of the
above mentioned space-time relativisations aims
at
realizing the discussed phenomenon
-
its
placing in the proper cultural context.
192
U źródeł megalilyzmu w kulturze pucharów lejkowatych
Now the attention will be shifted on other hero
of the present dissertation, that is the TRB culture
(Trichterbecherkultur).
Almost every publication
devoted to megalithism of the TRB culture begins
with remarks on great degree of devastation of
monuments under consideration. This euphemis¬
tic term in fact means that even most permanent
great-stone structures (dolmens, passage tombs)
were almost completely destroyed. From among
thousands of tombs only not numerous ones sur¬
vived and were even preliminarily documented
[Midgley
2008: 29-32].
Even more serious losses
affected the oldest forms of the TRB culture meg¬
aliths
—
ehamberless tombs. They were used as
a comfortable source of stone and leveled as an ef¬
fect of contemporary intensification of agriculture.
As an example of this state a fact mentioned by
W. Chmielewski
[1952: 7-8]
that
14
km long part
of road from
Izbica
Kujawska
to Lubraniec was
built of stones from ehamberless tombs kerbs may
serve as an example. As an effect of such activi¬
ties ehamberless tombs almost completely disap¬
peared as permanent landscape elements.
Vicissitudes of tombs built with the use of stone
create the background that allows understanding
the range of problems connected with identifica¬
tion and analysis of monuments, construction of
which was based on the least permanent technical
solution. An excellent exemplification, almost an
archetype, are here interpretative problems con¬
nected with results of research conducted by Bar¬
bara Burchardt in
Niedźwiedź I, Miechów
district
[Burchardt
1973].
As it is known, the initial diag¬
nosis of the structure registered on this site (foun¬
dation trench with traces of post-holes) indicated
a house of the Malice culture. In a consequence of
many discussions finally arguments of
Magdalena
Midgley
[1985: 110],
who proved a connection
of the monument with tradition of ehamberless
tombs were accepted.
On taking up the subject of megalithism in
TRB culture the author wants to base the analy¬
ses on objects, which in respect of form and con¬
struction refer to the discovery in
Niedźwiedź
1.
In the present dissertation this specific monument
type will be defined as
Niedźwiedź
type tombs
(further: NTT). This term contains only reference
to model site . Therefore it does not involved in
interpretational subtleties underlying sometimes
used terms: degraded megaliths
[Jażdżewski
1970: 21],
quasi-megaliths
[e.g.
Kosko
2006]
or
megaxylon [Tunia
2003].
It is either impossible
to define NTT as just wooden tombs through
analogy to discoveries from Kuyavia [Rzepecki
2004: 124].
Actual changeability of the phenom¬
enon, in its European scale, is far bigger than the
cited proposal of ehamberless tombs division into
stone, wooden and stone-wooden structures.
To make no mention of certain terminological
doubts, it is worth to ask a question which features
should be distinctive for NTT. Before formulating
the answer it is necessary to emphasize two prob¬
lems. Firstly, ehamberless tombs of TRB culture
were often many-phase structures what obviously
impedes many analyses, including reconstruction
of their form in individual phases of their func¬
tioning [Rzepecki
2004: 124].
Secondly, what was
mentioned before, tombs built without the use of
great-stone structures were especially exposed
to devastation, both in prehistory and nowadays.
In many cases this impedes a description of some
aspects of tombs form, e.g. this concerns a ques¬
tion of mounds and burials existence.
Taking the above mentioned circumstances
into consideration, it should be emphasized that
in the present paper it has been assumed that NTT
is a specific type of ehamberless tombs, for which
an indicative feature is the existence of founda¬
tion trenches marking the ground part of the
monument. Also the lack of great-stone struc¬
tures is significant for a diagnostic aspect. The
mentioned conditions allow the reconstruction of
NTT as monuments, the appearance of which was
dominated by a wooden palisade or wattle struc¬
ture. Stones, even if they occurred, did not play
a significant role in their image.
In hitherto literature there is no a comprehen¬
sive interpretation of problems connected with
NTT. These issues were usually discussed on the
occasion of papers concerning the whole of eham¬
berless tombs. A good example of this is a work by
Magdalena
Midgley from
1985
entitled The Ori¬
gin and Function of the Long Barrows of Northern
Europe.
For the areas of the northern group of the TRB
culture (actually: terrains of Denmark) a work
by
Torsten Madsen [1979]
Earthen Long Bar¬
rows and Timber Structures: Aspects of the Early
Neolithic Mortuary Practice in Denmark is fun¬
damental. It presented information about known
at that time from Denmark ehamberless tombs
containing timber structures. Modest attempts of
syntheses are also included in studies on sites
Storgård
IV [Kristiansen
1989]
and Fr0slev polde
Summary
193
[Eisenehmidt 1996].
A recapitulation of the state
of research may also be found in a paper by Chris¬
topher Tilley
[1996]
entitled An ethnography of
the Neolithic. Early prehistoric societies in south¬
ern Scandinavia.
In case
oí
the southern group
oí
the TRB cul¬
ture, a work of
Günter Möbes [1983]
should be
mentioned, who in the article
Baaiberger
Graban¬
lagen im Thüringen Becken
outlined the prob¬
lems connected with chamberless tombs in the
northern and central parts of Thuringia. Interest¬
ing data exceeding the subject of the study itself,
were brought by a study on a tomb from Queis
[Petzschmann
2006].
Also papers devoted to tombs from the area
of the eastern and south-eastern groups are usu¬
ally of fragmentary character. The present state
of research is well showed in articles included in
a volume edited by
Jerzy Libera
and
Krzysztof
Tu-
nia
[2006
1 Idea
megalityczna w obrządku pogrze¬
bowym
kultury
pucharów lejka
walych. Valuable
supplements of
lhe
information are recent discov¬
eries made on
siles
Jastrzębiec
4,
Gorzów Wielko¬
polski
district and
Kenirc. 5-6,
Myślibórz
district
IKzepeckì
201 1).
In
chapter I the author presents a register of
analogies known for individual regional TRB cul¬
ture groups. In
cíase
of the eastern group these are
sites:
Inowrocław
95,
Inowrocław
district (fig.
1-8),
Jastrzębiec
4,
Gorzów Wielkopolski
district (fig.
9-
-20),
Podgaj 7A, Aleksandrów Kujawski
district
(fíg.
21), Renice 5-6,
Myślibórz
district (fig.
22-25).
From the area of the south-eastern TRB culture
group monuments of the type under analysis are
known from sites:
Niedźwiedź I, Miechów
district
(fig.
27),
Zagaję Slradowskie, Kazimierza Wielka
district (fig.
32),
Lublin-Slawinek II, Lublin dis¬
trict (fig.
26),
Pawłów
3,
Sandomierz
district (fig.
28-30)
and Slonowice G
Kazimierza Wielka
district (fig.
31).
NTT also occurred on
10
sites of the northern
TRB culture group: Bygholm N0rremark, Vejle
amt (fig.
33),
Fi^slev polde,
Åbenrå amt
(fig.
34),
Harreby II, Haderslev amt (fig.
35),
Konsager,
Randers
amt (fig.
36),
Mosegården, Skanderborg
amt (fig.
37),
Teglvaerksgården, Varde
amt (fig.
38),
Troelstrup, Viborg amt (fig.
39),
Storgård
IV,
Viborg amt (fig.
40),
Strandby-Skovgrave (Strand-
by/Nabben), Strandby amt (fig.
41)
and Surl0kke,
S0nderborg amt (fig.
42).
Most known NTT were registered within the
southern TRB culture group. Unfortunately, in
prevailing part these are unexplored monuments.
Also the state of publication of many tombs should
be defined as incomplete. What deserves special
emphasis is discoveries on sites:
Březno, Louny
District (fig.
43-45), Dölauer Heide Ldkr. Saale¬
kreis
(fig.
46), Freinenbessingen, Ldkr. Sonder¬
hausen
(fig.
47), Großbrembach, Landkreis Söm-
merda
(fig.
48), Großfarmer, Landkreis Erfurt
(fig.
49-50), Polleben - Hügel auf dem Teichberg ,
Landkreis Mansfelder Land
(fig.
51), Stemmern
site
2, Landkreies Wanzleben
(fig.
54), Stottern-
heim, Landkreis Erfurt
(fig.
55), Queis, Landkreis
Saalkreis
(fig.
56-57), Zauschwitz, Landkreis
Borna (fig.
58), Zörbig, Landkreis Bitterfeld
(fig.
59), Unseburg, Landkreis Aschersleben-Staßfurt,
Großlehna-Altranstädt, Landkreis Leipziger Land
(fig.
60), Niederndoleben, Landkreis Leipziger
Land
(fig.
61).
NTT was also recognized on many
sites by aerial research (fig.
62-64)
[Schwartz
1997; 1998; 1999; 2000; 2003;
2003a; 2003b;
2004; 2005; 2006;
Heynowski
2004: 290-291].
In the following part of the dissertation the au¬
thor presents his opinion on
taxonomie
position of
NTT among the whole of long mounds of the TRB
culture. In the presented interpretation, NTT are
fragment of continuum of phenomena created by
the whole of the linear tombs population (fig.
65-
-66).
In successive parts of the paper the author
presents distribution features (fig.
67-71)
and for¬
mal characteristics
(72-74)
of NTT.
According to the author, NTT do not demon¬
strate features different from other forms of cham¬
berless tombs as far as features of their distribu¬
tion, sizes, spatial orientation are concerned.
What is a specific feature of NTT is the way of
construction (foundation trench), a considerable
percentage of monuments deprived of burial trac¬
es (c.
50%),
a considerable percentage of tombs
without mounds. This supports a conception, ac¬
cording to which NTT generally were very light
in form, constructed with the use of palisades or
walls made of wattle (fig.
76-80).
In chronological aspect, the significance of
4000
ВС
caesura is marked (fig.
81).
The author
however emphasizes that this date may be treated
as both terminus ante
quem
and post quern for the
genesis of a custom of building such tombs.
Chapter
3
of the dissertation is devoted to an
attempt at outlining the position of NTT analo¬
gies among the cultures of western Europe. The
analyses covered the areas of France and Great
Britain.
l
Al
I
żrńdcl
mv
gulii vzmii ic
kulturze ¡»urłitiróir
/rjkoiralycli
In casc ol
branec t
lit- author4
s attention
concen¬
trated on
lhe
description of tombs known as sepul-
turesi
struci
uresi
monuments
de type
Passy
(further:
STP).
They were shown on the background
oí
other chamberless forms
—
tertres
t
umida
ires (fig.
82-92).
The significance of tombs known from the
Michelsberg Culture (fig.
93-91)
is also empha¬
sized. They arc defined as enclose
/¡menare
du
Michelsberg (further: KFM). NTT analogies were
also recognized on the area of (¿real Britain. Here
they arc defined as long mortuary enclosures
(further: I.MK; fig.
9.1-99).
Next, two specific forms ol mcgalithic monu¬
ments
—
graves ol
(
lhanihlaudes type and mono¬
liths were discussed. Kssential significance for
their proliferation had the creation of spatially de¬
veloped systems of exchange. Among them, a spe¬
cial role should he ascribed to making permeable
the transalpine routes connected with obtaining
and distribution of objects of prestige (jewellery,
axes) made of jadeite and
fibrolite.
Their impor¬
tant role in megalithic monuments of the formative
phase is quite well recognized (burial equipment,
petroglyphs on menhirs)
[Cassen et
al.
2011].
What is extremely significant for our considera¬
tions is the coincidence between chronology of
the transalpine deposits use and directions of the
spread of the earliest forms of jadeite axes
(ΛΙ-
tenstadl and
Bégude types: cf.:
lig.
101).
and the
penetration of
lhe
idea of tombs of Chamhlandes
type and menhirs.
What has the essential
significane«1
lor the
presented conclusions is the author4
s
hypoth¬
esis about the necessity of doniogenie palisade
tombs (further: DPT) distinguishing, understood
as a superior idea for building earlier character¬
ized forms: NTT.
STR
EFM and LME. They are
characteristic of
mimetism
of form in relation to
Danubian
building.
Taking into account the chronology of the men¬
tioned tomb forms, the author outlines quite com¬
plex model of their propagation. The prototypes may
have been solutions observed in
STF;
they were next
adapted by the TRB culture societies. Michelsberg
and Carinated Bowl Neolithic cultures.
In ease of NTT their occurrence is seen as linked
with the process of the TRB culture emergence: the
author distinguishes here two basic phases of the
process: initiation and proliferation phases.
The system initiation stage is connected with
the period c.
440-4200
ВС
and a zone, west wing
of which is formed by
Harz
Foreland and
Saale,
and the eastern
—
the river Vistula. Cultural trans¬
formations on the area of the Paris Basin started
processes of migration and cultural fusion as well
as synthetizing local
Danubian
patterns and
exogenii:
—
west European elements. This proc¬
ess was especially well recognized for the area of
Kuyavia [Rzepecki
2004].
It is worth to emphasize that for groups creating
lhe
earliest versions of the Kuyavian TRB cul¬
ture rising NTT had incredible symbolic qualities.
Reside, however, societies of the late Linear Pot¬
tery cultures developed, using long (and
trapezoid)
homesteads. In this context the
mimetism
of NTT
offered the maintenance of symbolism of long hous¬
es monumental ism with emphasis on diversity.
The assumed possibility of direct confronta¬
tion of DPT with patterns with building of the late
Linear Pottery Culture society probably contribut¬
ed to formal modification of patterns known from
STP or EFM
-
for the maintenance and increase
of their persuasive qualities in local conditions.
For the TRB culture societies the described type
of monuments probably became an instrument,
which compensated the monumentalism
oí
con¬
temporary long linear houses. Whereas, for
groups of the late Linear Potteiy Culture
-
an al¬
ternative although probably having different reli¬
gious senses, way of manifestation of symbolism
of long house. NTT became here extraordinarily
important elements of a dialogue between
Danu¬
bian
and beaker societies.
The period of the TRB culture proliferation
should be connected with an interval e.
4200-
-3500
ВС,
when the presence of funnel beakers
reached its almost maximum extent. As it was
stated above, the motive power of this process was
probably migrations as well as progressive accul¬
turation of both Mesolithic societies and groups of
the
Danubian
tradition. As far as acculturation
of hunting-gathering groups is treated as some¬
thing almost evident, it is just a perspective of
linear societies that is especially meaningful.
Many of them in course of time were included to
the world of pan-European TRB cultural patterns
circulation. This vividly expresses the scale of
beaker cultural success.
The described monuments as instruments of
conversion played an important role in the course
of the TRB culture proliferation process [Sher-
ratt
1997: 354-371: 1999].
The cited author as¬
cribes to them a highly important, persuasive and
propaganda role in beaker rhetoric directed to
Summary
195
participants of acculturation processes. Although
A. Sherratt
[1999]
in this case limits himself to
concentrating on hunting-gathering societies,
but the same functions may be ascribed to linear
tombs registered in regions of long tradition of the
Neolithic occupation (e.g. Czech, Little Poland)
where they may have played a role of an important
sociomanipulative tool in confrontation with the
local
Danubian
societies.
Considerable differences of contexts need
some emphasis. As far as for societies of Satrup
- Fuchsberg
groups the monumentalism of long
tombs was an important
novum,
for groups of the
Danubian
tradition
—
it was only a surrogate of the
older and contemporary symbolism of long houses
(and their ruins!). Mimetic character of NTT may
have been important symbolic quality for them
-
as the closest to the ideal of the ancestors4
house . Generally, flexibility of the linear tombs
symbolism was one of important components of
the TRB culture success .
Regardless of still initial state of recognition of
chronology and formal differentiation of the earli¬
est TRB culture megalithic monuments, it is nec¬
essary to formulate a proposal that organizes the
available information. Although the polilinearism
of the beaker megalithism development causes
that identification
oí
clear caesuras is difficult,
a theoretical outline of the dynamics of changes in
ceremonial of the monumental TRB culture may
be given. It must be however accompanied by the
awareness of unsatisfactory degree of empiric ver¬
ification of the suggested model.
Referring to the general proposal of the linear
tombs classification, the author wants to formu¬
late a general model of their architectonic forms
changeability:
A
-
NTT,
с
4400-3350/2900
ВС,
В
—
tombs with stone or timber-stone kerb
(c.
4200-2900
ВС),
С
—
chamber tombs placed in stone kerbs
(c.
3700/3500 - 3300/3200
ВС)
[cf. Midgley:
1992: 418-474, 2008: 2-3;
Malmer
2002:51-56].
On commenting the presented proposal it
should be pointed out that the initial role (at the
same time the only postulated) in creation of do¬
mogenic trend of the TRB culture megalitism
was played by NTT. Their
mimetism
in relation
to norms
oï
the
Danubian
building was one of
the factors ensuring active adaptation to the DPT
ideas. Successive stages of the development are
connected with developing autonornization of ar¬
chitectonic patterns. This process is diagnosed
first of all by the increase of stone raw material
use till the adaptation of the chamber building
idea (since
с
3700/3500
ВС).
What needs emphasis is polilinearism of the
domogenic funeral TRB culture architecture. It
is especially well confirmed since c.
4 000
ВС
when we deal with permanent contemporaneity of
different norms use. Some of them (e.g. chamber
tombs) had never been adapted on the whole area
of the TRB culture occurrence.
To end with, it is worth to emphasize one cir¬
cumstance. Symbolism included in the idea of
monumental long house, then modified in domog¬
enic tomb was an exceptionally stable structure
of long lasting . This testifies to an exceptional
cultural attractiveness of the idea of monumental
house
—
ancestors4 house.
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Rzepecki, Seweryn 1974- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1180058380 |
| author_facet | Rzepecki, Seweryn 1974- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Rzepecki, Seweryn 1974- |
| author_variant | s r sr |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV040409681 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)780379455 (DE-599)BVBBV040409681 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02375nam a2200517 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV040409681</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20200417 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">120910s2011 ab|| |||| 00||| pol d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9788392888772</subfield><subfield code="9">978-83-928887-7-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">8392888774</subfield><subfield code="9">8392888774</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)780379455</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV040409681</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">pol</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">6,11</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">7,41</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rzepecki, Seweryn</subfield><subfield code="d">1974-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1180058380</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">U źródeł megalityzmu w kulturze pucharów lejkowatych</subfield><subfield code="c">Seweryn Rzepecki ; Instytut Archeologii Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Fundacja Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Łódź</subfield><subfield code="b">Instytut Archeologii Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego</subfield><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">195 s., [5] k. tabl. złoż.</subfield><subfield code="b">Ill., Kt.</subfield><subfield code="c">31 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Spatium Archaeologicum</subfield><subfield code="v">3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zsfassung in engl. Sprache u.d.T.: At the sources of megalithism in the TRB culture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bibliogr. s. 175-189</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kultura pucharów lejkowatych</subfield><subfield code="2">jhpk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Zabytki megalityczne</subfield><subfield code="2">jhpk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Groby prehistoryczne</subfield><subfield code="2">jhpk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Grab</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4021716-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Megalithkultur</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4038344-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Trichterbecherkultur</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4186075-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Trichterbecherkultur</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4186075-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Megalithkultur</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4038344-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Grab</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4021716-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Spatium Archaeologicum</subfield><subfield code="v">3</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV039576110</subfield><subfield code="9">3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 2</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025262673&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025262673&sequence=000006&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-025262673</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">930.1</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0901</subfield><subfield code="g">438</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">930.1</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0901</subfield><subfield code="g">4</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV040409681 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T00:23:25Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9788392888772 |
| language | Polish |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-025262673 |
| oclc_num | 780379455 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 195 s., [5] k. tabl. złoż. Ill., Kt. 31 cm |
| publishDate | 2011 |
| publishDateSearch | 2011 |
| publishDateSort | 2011 |
| publisher | Instytut Archeologii Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego |
| record_format | marc |
| series | Spatium Archaeologicum |
| series2 | Spatium Archaeologicum |
| spelling | Rzepecki, Seweryn 1974- Verfasser (DE-588)1180058380 aut U źródeł megalityzmu w kulturze pucharów lejkowatych Seweryn Rzepecki ; Instytut Archeologii Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Fundacja Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego Łódź Instytut Archeologii Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego 2011 195 s., [5] k. tabl. złoż. Ill., Kt. 31 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Spatium Archaeologicum 3 Zsfassung in engl. Sprache u.d.T.: At the sources of megalithism in the TRB culture Bibliogr. s. 175-189 Kultura pucharów lejkowatych jhpk Zabytki megalityczne jhpk Groby prehistoryczne jhpk Grab (DE-588)4021716-4 gnd rswk-swf Megalithkultur (DE-588)4038344-1 gnd rswk-swf Trichterbecherkultur (DE-588)4186075-5 gnd rswk-swf Trichterbecherkultur (DE-588)4186075-5 s Megalithkultur (DE-588)4038344-1 s Grab (DE-588)4021716-4 s DE-604 Spatium Archaeologicum 3 (DE-604)BV039576110 3 Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 2 application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025262673&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025262673&sequence=000006&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Abstract |
| spellingShingle | Rzepecki, Seweryn 1974- U źródeł megalityzmu w kulturze pucharów lejkowatych Spatium Archaeologicum Kultura pucharów lejkowatych jhpk Zabytki megalityczne jhpk Groby prehistoryczne jhpk Grab (DE-588)4021716-4 gnd Megalithkultur (DE-588)4038344-1 gnd Trichterbecherkultur (DE-588)4186075-5 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4021716-4 (DE-588)4038344-1 (DE-588)4186075-5 |
| title | U źródeł megalityzmu w kulturze pucharów lejkowatych |
| title_auth | U źródeł megalityzmu w kulturze pucharów lejkowatych |
| title_exact_search | U źródeł megalityzmu w kulturze pucharów lejkowatych |
| title_full | U źródeł megalityzmu w kulturze pucharów lejkowatych Seweryn Rzepecki ; Instytut Archeologii Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Fundacja Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego |
| title_fullStr | U źródeł megalityzmu w kulturze pucharów lejkowatych Seweryn Rzepecki ; Instytut Archeologii Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Fundacja Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego |
| title_full_unstemmed | U źródeł megalityzmu w kulturze pucharów lejkowatych Seweryn Rzepecki ; Instytut Archeologii Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Fundacja Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego |
| title_short | U źródeł megalityzmu w kulturze pucharów lejkowatych |
| title_sort | u zrodel megalityzmu w kulturze pucharow lejkowatych |
| topic | Kultura pucharów lejkowatych jhpk Zabytki megalityczne jhpk Groby prehistoryczne jhpk Grab (DE-588)4021716-4 gnd Megalithkultur (DE-588)4038344-1 gnd Trichterbecherkultur (DE-588)4186075-5 gnd |
| topic_facet | Kultura pucharów lejkowatych Zabytki megalityczne Groby prehistoryczne Grab Megalithkultur Trichterbecherkultur |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025262673&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025262673&sequence=000006&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV039576110 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rzepeckiseweryn uzrodełmegalityzmuwkulturzepucharowlejkowatych |