Mity i stereotypy w dziejach Polski i Ukrainy w XIX i XX wieku:
Gespeichert in:
| Format: | Buch |
|---|---|
| Sprache: | Polish Ukrainian |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Warszawa [u.a.]
Inst. Pamięci Narodowej
2012
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Klappentext Abstract |
| Beschreibung: | Zsfassung in engl. Sprache u.d.T.: Myths and stereotypes in the history of Poland and Ukraine in the nineteenth and twentieth century |
| Beschreibung: | 494 S. |
| ISBN: | 9788376293530 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV040404673 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20220419 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 120905s2012 |||| 00||| pol d | ||
| 020 | |a 9788376293530 |9 978-83-7629-353-0 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)815889505 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV040404673 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a pol |a ukr | |
| 049 | |a DE-Re13 |a DE-12 |a DE-739 |a DE-M352 | ||
| 084 | |a KD 6900 |0 (DE-625)72322: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a 7,41 |2 ssgn | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Mity i stereotypy w dziejach Polski i Ukrainy w XIX i XX wieku |c pod red. Andrzeja Czyżewskiego ... |
| 264 | 1 | |a Warszawa [u.a.] |b Inst. Pamięci Narodowej |c 2012 | |
| 300 | |a 494 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Zsfassung in engl. Sprache u.d.T.: Myths and stereotypes in the history of Poland and Ukraine in the nineteenth and twentieth century | ||
| 546 | |a Beitr. teilw. poln., teilw. ukrain. - Teilw. in kyrill. Schr., ukrain. | ||
| 648 | 7 | |a Geschichte 1800-2000 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Mythos |0 (DE-588)4075159-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Stereotyp |0 (DE-588)4057329-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Ukraine |0 (DE-588)4061496-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Polen |0 (DE-588)4046496-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Polen |0 (DE-588)4046496-9 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Ukraine |0 (DE-588)4061496-7 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Mythos |0 (DE-588)4075159-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Stereotyp |0 (DE-588)4057329-1 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a Geschichte 1800-2000 |A z |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Czyżewski, Andrzej |d 1980- |e Sonstige |0 (DE-588)1089835825 |4 oth | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m HEBIS Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025257795&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Passau |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025257795&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Klappentext |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025257795&sequence=000006&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Abstract |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-025257795 | ||
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 900 |e 22/bsb |f 09034 |g 477 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 900 |e 22/bsb |f 0904 |g 477 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 900 |e 22/bsb |f 0904 |g 438 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 900 |e 22/bsb |f 09034 |g 438 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804149455758295040 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | INSTYTUT PAMIĘCI NARODOWEJ
KOMISJA ŚCIGANIA ZBRODNI PRZECIWKO NARODOWI POLSKIEMU
MITY I STEREOTYPY
W DZIEJACH
POLSKI I UKRAINY
w XIX i XX wieku
pod redakcją
Andrzeja Czyżewskiego, Rafała Stobieckiego,
Tomasza Toborka, Leonida Zaszkilniaka
WARSZAWA-ŁODZ 2012
SPIS TREŚCI
Rafał Stobiecki, Wprowadzenie 7
I MIT, STEREOTYP, PAMIĘĆ WE WSPÓŁCZESNEJ HUMANISTYCE,
ZE SZCZEGÓLNYM UWZGLĘDNIENIEM HISTORIOGRAFII
Jerzy Maternicki, Historiografia i mity 11
JleoHin 3auiKijibHHK, MitJ)onoriHHi niflCTaBH KOHCTpyiOBaHHa yKpaiHCbicoi icTopii
B nocTMOflepHy flo6y 26
Wojciech Wrzosek, Osiem tez o obecności mitu w historii 35
Maciej Bugajewski, Historiozoficzne wymiary dekonstrukcji mitu 39
AjIJia Knpil/IOH, ICTOpMHHa naM HTb HK TpaBMaTHHHHH pO3pHB i3 MHHyjIHM:
npo6neMHe none cynacHoro icTopHHHoro flHCKypcy 45
Karolina Polasik-Wrzosek, Etnografia/etnologia jako świadectwo stereotypu
etnicznego 55
II HISTORIOGRAFIA MIĘDZY MITOTWÓRSTWEM A MITOBURSTWEM
Andrzej Wierzbicki, Mitologizacje i demitologizacje „Słowiańszczyzny w polskiej
myśli historycznej XIX wieku 65
IB3H KyuHH, nonbma B yKpaTHCbKiń icTopiorpa(j)ii FajiHHHHH XIX CT : Mi(J) npo
Katarzyna Błachowska, „Powrót do Macierzy - przyłączenie Rusi Halickiej
do Korony w interpretacji Adama Naruszewicza 88
Agnieszka Kawalec, U źródeł legendy Ossolineum 98
Ceprift CepnKOB, G3y iTCbice iiiKijibHHHTBO HK HHHHHK nporpecHBHoro/perpecHBHoro
po3BHTKy Peni nocnojiHToT y nonbCbiGH icTopiorpa(J)ii 1850-1870-x poKiB 113
Wiesław Puś, Mit rewolucji przemysłowej w historiografii polskiej 122
Marzena Iwańska, Miasto i przestrzeń miejska w świadomości mieszkańców Łodzi
przełomu XIX i XX wieku 129
Przemysław Waingertner, „Rządzi Polską zakonspirowana mafia - o stereotypie
masonerii w II Rzeczypospolitej 137
Joanna Pisulińska, Historycy lwowscy lat 1918-1939 Różne kształty pamięci 150
TeTHHa H,HM6aji, Mi j)H yKpai HCbKHx eiwirpaHTiB HK cnoci6 36epeaceHHfl 3B a3Ky
3 6aTbKiBm,HHOK 161
BiKTopin KoHCTamiHOBa «CBOI—ny Ki?»: B3aeMHi Mi(J)H Ta cTepeoranH
B CBiflOMOCTi yKpamcbKoro Ta nojibCbKoro HaceneHHa niBHiHHoro IIpHa3OB a
(3a MaTepiajiaMH icTopHKO-apxeorpatJ)iMHHx eKcneflHuiH) 171
III POLACY I UKRAIŃCY WOBEC KULTU BOHATERÓW NARODOWYCH
Bożena Płonka-Syroka, Stereotypowe cechy polskiego romantycznego polityka
Ludwik Mierosławski i Edward Dembowski - analiza porównawcza 183
Jliflin JIa3ypKo, iHTejieKTyaubHe KOJIO „Kwartalnika Historycznego jibBiBCbicoT
AO6H: TBopeHHfl KyjibTy HaiiioHaJibHoro repoa 198
iiii MacHemco, Mi^ojiorisauja o6pa3y BoraaHa XMejibHHiibKoro B yKpaiHCbKin
yMui Ta HaujoHajibHiH CBiflOMOCTi apyroi nonoBHHH XIX - nepuioi
TpeTHHH XX CT 210
Zbigniew Anusik, Fenomen Iwana Mazepy w historiografii polskiej XIX i XX w 224
BrrajiHi TejibBaK, MHxaHJio FpyrueBCbKHH: M X AOJiaHHHM i TBopeHHaM icTOpHHHHX
Mi(J)iB 249
Mariola Hoszowska, Mit Matki Polki w dziewiętnastowiecznych syntezach histo-
rycznych 262
Marta Sikorska-Kowalska, Mikołaj Hankiewicz - bohater dwóch narodów 293
Magdalena Nowak, Metropolita Andrzej Szeptycki - między rzeczywistością histo-
ryczną a mitologiczną 302
Rafał Stobiecki, Józef Piłsudski i jego miejsce w narodowym imaginarium
Polaków 320
Hanna Wójcik-Łagan, Piłsudski i Ukraina w przekazie szkolnym w latach trzydzie-
stych XX w Przyczynek do kultu Marszałka 346
IV DZIEDZICTWO RZECZYPOSPOLITEJ WIELU NARODÓW
POLSKO-UKRAIŃSKIE SPORY WOKÓŁ MITU KOZACZYZNY
Andrzej Stępnik, Mit Kozaczyzny w historiografii polskiej XIX i XX wieku 365
K)pifi BOJIOUIHH, IJJjiHxeTCbKi ifleanH B KO3aiibKOMy coiuyMi JIiBo6epe KHOi YicpaiHH
60-70-x poKiB XVIII CT 384
Violetta Julkowska, Dekonstrukcja mitu Kozaczyzny w Dwu latach dziejów naszych
Karola Szajnochy 393
Eugeniusz Koko, Obraz Rusinów-Ukraińców w piśmiennictwie Franciszka
Rawity-Gawrońskiego 408
BajieiiTHiia LLlaii/ipa, IcTopia i Bna^a Ha FIpaBo6epe KHiH YKpaiHi B XIX — nonaTKy
XX CTOniTTa: TBopeHHH jieriTHMauiHHHX Mi(j)iB 415
Baciuib neflHH, IcTopia HK noniTHKa (flHCKyciT B rauHUbKJH yKpaiHCbKJH icTopiorpa-
4 iT Mi KBoeHHoro nacy) 428
KOCTHHTHH lB3Hr0p0HCbKHH, PaflHHCbKHH icTOpiorpactpiHHHH MifJ) npO JlK)6jliHCbKy
yHiio SK „3arap6aHHfl YKpaiHH Floubrueio 438
Dorota Malczewska-Pawelec, Geneza Kozaczyzny w peerelowskich syntezach
dziejów Polski 448
WYKAZ SKRÓTÓW / CnHCOK CKOPOHEHb 463
SUMMARY • 465
INDEKS NAZWISK / nOKA3HHK nPBBHIIJ 475
Obserwujemy dziś rehabilitację mitu i stereotypu jako narzędzi
pozwalających wyjść poza scjentystyczny ideał historiografii,
odsłaniających fundament} myślenia o przeszłości i jego kulturo¬
we, religijne czy ideologiczne uwikłania.
Tom studiów7
Miti/
i stereotypy rc dziejach Polski i llkmimt
ri
Х/Х
/
XX
¡г.
jest wspólnym dziełem historyków, którzy od lat uczest¬
niczą w naukowym dialogu polsko-ukraińskim. W centrum
zainteresowania autorów pozostaje historiografia narodowa jako
ukształtowana w
XIX
stuleciu opowieść o przeszłości rywalizują¬
cych ze sobą społeczności.
Pierwsza część
-
Mit, stereotyp, pamięć we współczesnej
ìiiimanistyce,
ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem historiografii
-
grupuje teksty o cha¬
rakterze teoretyczno-metodologicznym. Część druga
-
Historio¬
grafia. Miedzi/ mitotworstwciu
a
mitobiirstieeiu
~
łączy wypowiedzi
odnoszące się do różnych tematów: od historii politycznej, przez
historię kultury i życia naukowego, aż po zagadnienia z dziedzi¬
ny dziejów gospodarczych. Kolejna część
-
Polna/ i Ukraina/ wobec
kultu bohaterów narodowych
-
odwołuje się do trwale zakorzenio¬
nych w narodowych narracjach wizerunków herosów, m.in. do
postaci Bohdana Chmielnickiego i Józefa Piłsudskiego. Wreszcie
ostatnia, zatytułowana Dziedzictwo Rzeczpospolitej wielu narodów.
Pohko-nkraińskie spory wokół mitu Kozaczyzm/, zbiera tekst}7 odno¬
szące się do wspólnej przeszłości, zarówno tej dokumentującej
współpracę obu nacji, jak i tej, której symbolem stał}7 się drama¬
tyczne konflikty z
XVII
i
XVIII
w.
SUMMARY
Myths and stereotypes in the History of Poland and Ukraine in the
Nineteenth and Twentieth Century, edited by
Andrzej Czyżew-
ski,
Rafał Stobiecki, Tomasz Toborek
and Leonid Zaszkilniak
For many years, historiography has seen a progressive rehabilitation of myth and
stereotype as useful and still cognitively productive epistemological categories. Catego¬
ries that allow to go beyond the scholarly ideal of historiography, that are instruments
exposing the foundations of thinking about the past and its cultural, religious or ideo¬
logical entanglements. The volume we are presenting to our Readers addresses that very
tradition. Texts collected here have been divided into four thematic sections.
Articles grouped in the first section undertake a general reflection on the role of the
category of myth and stereotype in contemporary humanities. The cycle begins with
a paper by
Jerzy Maternicki,
in which the author emphasizes that mythical thinking
occurs when historians no longer control their actions or knowingly waive appropriate
rigors of scientific inquiry. The course of history becomes an object of faith instead
of scholarly investigation. This often leads to infusing the message with ideological
and political elements. However, as the author argues, this is not a reason to classify
each historical falsehood as myth, as historical myth is such a historical falsehood
that concerns matters of great importance, vital from the perspective of assessment of
a wider sphere of historical phenomena. The mythological character of a given histori¬
cal narrative depends on its creator s intentions and interpretations of this narrative by
the public. The latter have, in fact, the ability to create (falsify) the metaphorical
level of myth and render it dangerous. This involves a simplification and generalization
of a fragment of history . In conclusion, he states that mythical thinking is selective,
reduced and one-dimensional. It often focuses on minor episodes, which are conferred
the rank of great symbols.
Another text in this section is the article by Leonid Zaszkilniak. Author analyzes
the contemporary approach to the understanding of historical myth, which scholars of
various disciplines explain as a whole of historical knowledge constructed primarily by
modern historians. In this perspective, myths are closely associated with the social envi¬
ronment in which they function. According to the author, mythologization of historical
knowledge is an inevitable way of communing with the past and its understanding by
465
people today due to social expectations and needs. Based on his observations of changes
occurring within the Ukrainian historiography, he also points to examples of such social
mythologization in relation to the interpretation of the history of Ukraine.
Wojciech Wrzosek,
in turn, in his text Eight theses on the presence of myth in his¬
tory , examines the power of myths rooted in history and their impact on the develop¬
ment of reflection on the past. He addresses issues such as the demythologization of
myth, which he defines not as an attempt to verify or rebut the underlying foundations
of thought (imagery), but as a far broader process, deeply rooted in culture, in which
whole systems of thought are replaced with new ones. He also comes to the conclusion
that in the mutual relations between myth, history and historiography a basic distinc¬
tion should be made according to which myth is treated either as an element of the past
subject to falsification or as one that is not subject to this process. In the latter case, myth
is seen as an integral part of culture
-
a fragment of the past that we yearn for, that we
want to investigate.
Maciej Bugajewski,
on the other hand, in his study Historiosophical dimensions
of the deconstruction of myth , attempts to adapt the historiosophical perspective for
the study of myths, assuming that both modern and old philosophy of history focusing
on the question of the emancipation of subject in history are one of the major keys of
interpretation in this field. He formulates a list of questions for contemporary histo¬
riosophical reflection in reference to the study of myths, with particular emphasis on
the category of myth demythologization interpreted in the spirit of the philosophy of
Jacques Derrida.
The objective of another author
-
Alia Kyrydon
-
is to explain the problem of col¬
lective memory and to define the scope of research on this subject. According to the
author, the study of collective memory is first and foremost focused on a traumatic
break with the past. This process entails the following factors: conceptual, temporal,
spatial, identity-related, mental, awareness-related, loyalty-related and nation-forming.
Kyrydon also notes that collective memory is an essential component of national iden¬
tity. She stresses the importance of a country and its historical policy in the codification
of individual memory in relation to historical trauma.
The first part of the volume concludes with the text by
Karolina
Polasik-
Wrzosek.
The author develops the subject of the familiar
-
alien or me
-
the other relation in
the ethnographic context. She emphasizes that the most basic meaning of familiar is
good, domesticated, one with which I can identify. Alien , on the other hand, is one
whose otherness evokes fear, interest, anxiety and even laughter. From the anthropo¬
logical point of view, the subject of these relationships is more complex. We are dealing
with the perspective of a researcher whose subject of analysis is a representative of a dif¬
ferent world. The author notes that the gap between the familiar us and exotic them
is a great obstacle to understanding the other , an obstacle that can be overcome only
through some form of participation in the world of the other and closing the distance
between me and the other .
The second part of the volume is entitled Historiography. Between mythmaking
and mythoclasty ; grouped under this title are papers addressing various topics
-
from
political history, the history and culture of academic life, to the issues of economic his¬
tory. It opens with the text by
Andrzej Wierzbicki,
in which the author starts with an
466
analysis of the meaning of the label
Słowiańszczyzna
[ Slavdom ], including its emo¬
tional undertones. Then, he returns to the period when Slavophile attitudes intensified
(after
1795)
and describes how journalists and historians imagined the role or even the
mission of the Slavs. He outlines their views on the role of Russia (from the vision of the
most powerful Slavic state to even the victim of deslavization) and Poland (e.g. the trai¬
tor of the Slavdom). He quotes authors who exposed the duality of Russian and Catho¬
lic version of Pan-Slavism. Wierzbicki calls Slavophilism (from the Polish perspective)
as a new post-decline variant of optimism, which allowed for the acceptance of the
existing political situation.
In his article, Ivan Kutsyj analyzes the Ukrainian historiography of Eastern
Galicia
in
terms of stereotypical views and ideas about Poland and Poles. He emphasized the fact
that the attitude to the Polish issue remained a key element of the Ukrainian intellectual
thought throughout the nineteenth century. It was, in fact, a means of reinforcing the Ru-
thenian (Ukrainian) identity. That is why
-
as the author argues
-
the subject of Polish-
-Ukrainian relations was the most current one in Ukrainian historiography. At the same
time, it was thought that Poland betrayed the Slav interests and chose the Western path
of development. As Kutsyj concludes, the theme of the historic mistake of Poland ap¬
pears in the writings of many Ukrainian scholars studying the past of Eastern
Galicia.
In other texts, authors return to the field of Polish historiography.
Katarzyna
Błachowska
addresses the problem of interpreting the annexation of Halych
Ruthenia
to the Polish Crown in the pages of The History of the Polish Nation by Adam Na-
ruszewicz. As
Błachowska
notes, the historian inscribed the problem into the compre¬
hensively understood concept of the history of Red
Ruthenia.
The starting point was his
belief that the original great community of Slavic (West Slavic) tribes were Chrobates
[Chrobaci] who since the seventh century lived in Great Chrobatia
-
land spreading
over the area of the future Lesser Poland
[Małopolska]
and Red
Ruthenia.
In light of
Naruszewicz s theory, Polish state from its very beginnings was an entity that united
these tribes, and the original ethnic community of the tribes of later Lesser Poland and
Red
Ruthenia
was not questioned. The inclusion of the history of Red
Ruthenia
into the
history of the Polish nation was the practical realization of the theory of genetic link
between this region and Lesser Poland, as well as the Polish state in general.
Agnieszka Kawalec,
in turn, describes the process of mythologizing of the
Ossoliński
National Institute. Stressing the uniqueness of this institution, she concludes that the
legend of
Ossolineum
was born on several levels. It was seen as both a repository of
national heritage, Polish library and museum and, more broadly, as a symbol of Polish
culture. Those who emphasized the phenomenon of the institution, also noticed that it
assembled a group of outstanding personalities and intellectuals. The author based her
argument not only on the analysis of scientific or source publications, but also diaries,
memoirs and letters penned by writers emotionally invested in this organization. As she
concludes
-
each of them had their individual reasons to be grateful to that institution,
and each of them contributed to a different legend of the
Ossolineum.
The author of another paper
-
Serhiy Seryakov
-
addresses the subject of the evo¬
lution of the representations of Jesuit education influences on the development of the
Polish Republic present in Polish historiography dated from
1850
until
1870.
In his view,
research conducted by Polish historians
ofthat
period developed on two parallel planes.
467
Firstly, the objective was to establish a scale of progressivism and greed of Jesuit
schools. Secondly, the nature of the influence of Jesuit educational institutions on the
cultural and socio-political life of the Republic was analyzed. Seryakov comes to the
conclusion that the general trend in the representation of these issues evolved towards
the domination of neutral or pro-Jesuit attitudes, and the greatest success was achieved
in the typology of individual schools, as well as in testing the level of competency of
teachers. He also recognizes that certain inertia of old representations could be ob¬
served in assessing the practical value of the monastic education.
In his article,
Wiesław Puś
analyzes the notion of the myth of industrial revolution
in native historiography over the last few decades. He emphasizes that a significant
number of works in which this category was used appeared in Poland only after
1945.
He draws attention to the fact that in the initial period of the domination of historical
materialism as the only acceptable methodology, the notion of industrial revolution
functioned on the margins of the mainstream research. The main discussion about the
course and specifics of industrial revolution in the context of Polish history took place,
according to the author, in the
1950s
and
1960s.
As a result, an approach was developed,
applicable to the present day, according to which industrial revolution on the Polish ter¬
ritory was delayed compared to Western Europe.
Marzena Iwańska,
in turn, addresses the question of whether
Łódź
residents at the
turn of the twentieth century perceived the surrounding urban space as a specific mental
category? The author based her research on diaries and memoirs of the era. Iwanska s
analysis led her to the belief that narrative sources, as opposed to those of a purely
statistical nature, prove that somehow in spite of the development tendencies of
Łódź
at that time, the residents did not develop any strong sense of community and identifi¬
cation with the city in which they lived and worked. She comes to the conclusion that
the popular image of
Łódź
as a coherent urban structure with unique developmental
characteristics (present both in everyday knowledge and in academic works) should be
regarded as an example of a founding myth of the city.
Przemysław Waingertner
examines the segment of the inter-war journalism which
focused on following the actions
ornative
Freemasonry while promoting a decidedly
negative image thereof. He outlines a catalog of basic themes found in this type of
writings, such as the impact of Freemasonry on the process of Poland recovering the
independence after World War I, the involvement of Freemasons in parties and social
organizations in the reborn state or the settling of the members of lodges in mass
media and their manipulation of public opinion. He concludes that the time of the Sec¬
ond Republic was strongly dominated by the black legend of Freemasonry, and the
few voices of opposition against such an interpretation of the role of Freemasonry were
barely audible.
Writing about the circle of Lviv historians, Joanna
Pisulińska
emphasizes the
uniqueness of this magical place. She focuses on people at the University and the
Ossolineum
who gave different accounts of their work in Lviv. She also attempts to
capture factors that influenced the judgment of the past, such as dramatic circumstances
of leaving the city and sentiment and nostalgia for the lost land . On the other hand,
she analyzes critical opinions on the scholarly community of Lviv, expressed mostly by
persons coming from the outside.
Pisulińska
draws attention to such phenomena as the
468
manifestation
of superiority over the province by Cracow historians and the rivalry
between
Lv iv
and Warsaw.
The study by
Tety
ana Tsymbal analyzes the phenomenon of modern myth as a specific
competitor of the humanities, which in many cases are not able to explain complex social-
-psychological processes of the present day. The author drew attention to the awareness of
the carriers and creators of myths in the Ukrainian emigre environment. She shows that on
one hand the archetypal myth is a way to protect and carry on national traditions and main¬
tain connection with one s homeland. On the other, myths about the blissful life abroad
stimulate emigration. Tsymbal studied the most popular myths among immigrants: of Wes¬
tern freedom, totalitarian regime in Ukraine, the diaspora as the last bastion of Ukrainian
identity , salaries etc. She concludes that the mythology of Ukrainian immigrants functions
as a cure for nostalgia and as self-justification for one s family and community.
Viktoriya
Konstantinova,
author of the last of texts in the second part of the publi¬
cation, undertakes an analysis of selected examples of the reception of Poles and their
associated mythologizing practices by the multiethnic population of southern Ukraine.
She also drew attention to the potentially large amount
ofinformation
concerning the
relationship between Ukrainians and Poles, collected by Ukrainian researchers in inter¬
views with older residents of the region. The author also addresses the specific issues of
organization and methods of research in the so-called oral history.
In the third part of the volume entitled Poles, Ukrainians and the cult of national
heroes we are presenting texts concerning both major historical figures and mytholo-
gized images.
Bożena Płonka-Syroka,
in her examination of the characteristics of Polish roman¬
tic politician based on the example of
Ludwik Mierosławski
and Edward
Dembowski,
refers to the classical standard of Polish biographical writings. One of its traits is per¬
ceiving a human individual as rooted in society and culture, but also as being essentially
the creator of their own biography and responsible for personal choices . It is an analysis
of biographies which fit the heroic model of a romantic politician. The romantic costume
which they donned served them to play a role for their own personal satisfaction. Both
of them were creators of their own myth, addressing it to the audience which used the
same cultural code. Concluding her text, B.
Płonka-Syroka
stresses the need for a new
interpretation of the Polish tradition of national liberation, lest the fear of the myth de¬
struction hinders search for answers to questions.
Another article
-
by
Lidia Lazurko
-
is an attempt to analyze the views of the edi¬
tors of Historical Quarterly
[Kwartalnik Historyczny],
one of the most important and
influential magazines of Polish historiography in the late nineteenth and first half of the
twentieth century, concerning the process of shaping a national hero worship. The text
identifies three periods of study on this issue. The first is dated at the end of the nine¬
teenth and early twentieth century, when the magazine was dominated by Polish heroes
of the earliest age, especially
Piast
and the
Piast
dynasty. The second period covers the
time of the World War I, which opened up the prospects of rebuilding the Polish state
and strengthened the public interest in national history, especially the national move¬
ment under the leadership of
Tadeusz Kościuszko.
In the third period, in the interwar
times, issues of state-building activities of national leaders came to the fore
-
Mieszko
I, Boleslaus the Brave or John III
Sobieski.
469
Vitaliy Masnenko attempts to characterize the process of mythologizing the image
of
Bohdan Khmelnytsky
in the Ukrainian historical thought and national conscious¬
ness. He proposes his own vision of the process. He notes that the main components of
this myth had emerged in an even earlier period and were still existing, thus creating
a Little Russian variant of Khmelnytsky s image. This image of the
hetman
was de¬
liberately constructed as an antithesis to the Polish view (the Republic), remaining at the
same time under the influence of the common Russian tradition and later
-
the Great
Russian one. The author also notes that the Ukrainian national identity in relation to
the nationalization of the figure of Khmelnytsky was forced to read it in imperial pro¬
portions. The author traces a new approach to the
hetman
as a Ukrainian statesman
on the basis of works by V. Lypynskyi and Mykhailo Hrushevskyi, which, as he argues,
in themselves were a powerful mythologizing element.
Zbigniew
Anusik describes the phenomenon of Ivan
Mazepa
in Polish historiog¬
raphy of the nineteenth and twentieth century, dividing his discussion into two parts.
The first one attempts to introduce the reader to the most current and reliable findings
on the life and political career of
Mazepa.
On the other hand, he presents the attitude
of the native historiography to
Mazepa,
from the first, exiguous articles from the mid-
nineteenth century, ending with the extensive studies of the
1970s.
He concludes that, in
most cases, Polish historical scholarship approached the famous
hetman
objectively and
developed a generally positive assessment of his biography.
Vitaliy Telvak analyzes the accomplishments of the outstanding Ukrainian histo¬
rian, Mykhailo Hrushevskyi. The author presents the characteristics of debunking and
creation of historical myths in the Ukrainian historical scholarship of the late nineteenth
and early twentieth century. He also shows Hrushevskyi s considerable contribution to
the construction of myths of ethnicity, nationality and class. Telvak also attempts to
reproduce methodological mechanisms of the synthesizing work of the Ukrainian histo¬
rian and came to the conclusion that he particularly favored techniques such as univer-
salization of knowledge, ideologization, glorification, stereotyping and prophesizing. In
the opinion of the author, the study of the mechanisms of Hrushevsky s myth-making
practices is a current task, as it makes it possible to notice their presence also in the
contemporary Ukrainian humanities.
Mariola
Hoszowska attempts a reconstruction of the Polish Mother myth in the
works of such renowned Polish historians as Adam Naruszewicz, Joachim
Lelewel,
Jędrzej Moraczewski, Henryk
Schmitt,
Józef Szujski, Michał Bobrzyński, Władysław
Smoleński, August Sokołowski, Feliks Koneczny and Bolesław Limanowski.
She tries
to define the feminine and at the same time myth-making set of heroines appearing on
the pages of the works by these artists. What is more, she attempts to capture the modes
of argumentation characteristic of each of these historians and their typical narrative
strategies. As a result, she evaluates the degree of saturation of the analyzed syntheses
with the Polish Mother myth, and thus the role they played in shaping the social percep¬
tions of a women s sacrifice.
In another text,
Marta Sikorska-Kowalska
reflects on paths that lead to the pantheon
of national heroes on the example of a hero of not one, but two nations. Analyzing the
figure of M. Hankiewicz, she shows a hero accepted by the two nations, who gained
fame and recognition and was even immortalized in stone. The author poses a ques-
470
tion
-
what factors were decisive for such an outcome? The key to the answer seems
to be preaching the idea of independence of both nations, though these ideas were not
accepted by all contemporaries. Hankiewicz gained popularity and appreciation for his
tireless advocacy of conciliation. He became an example of a modern patriot, tolerant
preacher of national reconciliation and social equality, and also a model of modern po¬
litical thinking, serving overcoming barriers and fighting nationalism.
Magdalena
Nowak
examines the body of work (especially popularizing in character)
devoted to one of the most important figures of the Ukrainian national pantheon, Met¬
ropolitan
Andrzej
Szeptycki. The author concludes that despite the popular character of
the cited studies, their authors were able to avoid significant errors (extreme examples
excluded) in the factual aspect of their works. The opposite is the case, in the opinion
of the author, with their interpretative plane
-
the vast majority of which is highly emo¬
tionally charged. In addition to far less numerous works shaping a negative image of
the Metropolitan, the main subject of analysis are publications that present a decidedly
positive image of his life and work. Nowak s primary research tool is the notion of the
myth of sublime.
Two texts are devoted to
Józef Piłsudski. Rafał Stobiecki
attempts to look at this
figure from a different perspective than usual. The author s intention is not to contem¬
plate the historical role of the Marshal in the Polish history of the twentieth century,
nor to present his biography against the backdrop of the history of Polish socialism
or the Second Republic. For this purpose, R. Stobiecki adapts the concept of
lieux
de mémoire
( realm of memory ). A key issue is the question what kind of symbol
was and is
Józef Piłsudski
for the past and present generations of Poles? Starting from
the interwar period, through the war and occupation, the People s Republic times until
the present day, referring to the diverse source base (historiography, fiction, memoirs,
iconography), the author tries to capture the changes of
Józef
Piïsudski s
image and as¬
sociated with them mechanisms.
Hanna Wójcik-Łagan
describes the perception of the Marshal in school curricula
in the
1930s.
In the author s opinion, the figure of
Piłsudski
was predisposed to fulfill
a vital role in the upbringing of young generations of Poles for several reasons. He was
certainly controversial, but also inspiring. In the construction of the educational model
after the May Coup, he became a figure that embodied power. In terms of ideology, as
the leader, he was a medium of such attitudes as courage, devotion to the cause, sacrifice
for the idea. He was, finally, the emanation of a strong, viable state, as needed by his
countrymen living in post-war uncertainty. The author shows the place of
Piłsudski
and
his legend in the teaching of history, state education curricula and textbooks.
In the fourth section of the volume, the authors reflect on the heritage of the Republic
of many nations and evoke the Polish-Ukrainian disputes about the myth of Cossacks.
Andrzej Stępnik
believes it to be obvious that in the nineteenth and twentieth-cen¬
tury historiography, the image of Cossacks was the result of myths and stereotypes.
For him, it is a starting point for a discussion about the changeability and impact of
this myth. He emphasizes that very often it had an integrating function, stressed by
the advocates of familiarity of Cossacks coming from the Sarmatian and republican
gentry tradition. This idea was developed by historians associated with the ideology
of Polish Romanticism. The latter often embellished the image of a Cossack as a man
471
endowed with a special instinct for independence . In the interwar period, the domi¬
nant phenomena were, on the one hand, a fascination with Cossacks, on the other
-
openly manifested aversion. After World War II, the Cossack myth began to be used
as an instrument of political fight. Cossacks were reprehended for their peasant origins
and considered as a factor leading to the revolutionary overthrow of the noble-clerical
order in the country.
The next text is based on material from the Poltava Municipal Court sessions in the
years
1777-1780.
Yuriy Voloshyn examines the social ideals prevalent among the Cos¬
sacks from the Left-bank Ukraine
-
the Hetmanate. Ukrainian Cossacks, becoming
a part of the political nation in the Hetmanate, began to identify themselves with the
nobility and use social categories thereof. The foundation for the adoption of the noble
identity criteria by Cossack was, stated by the author, legal system based on the Statute
of Lithuania, according to which Cossacks
-
as a knightly nation
-
enjoyed the same
rights and privileges as the nobility. Hence the conclusion that despite the moderniza¬
tion taking place in the Hetmanate in the second half of the eighteenth century and
-
on the other hand
-
the attempts to integrate with the Russian empire, the social ideal
among Cossacks was still the state constitution of the old Republic.
Violetta Julkowska
analyzed the process of deconstructing the myth of Cossacks
in Two Years of Our History by
Karol Szajnocha.
The author tries to look closely at
one of the last works of this scholar, recognized as the classic of native historiography.
In her discussion, she addresses the myth of Cossacks as vital for Two Years of Our
History , defined by the author as a search for its broad cultural references. Employing
methods inspired by Jacques Derrida s philosophy of deconstruction, she shows the ex¬
tremely complex nature of historical account in the work of Szajnocha
—
historian who
was regarded by a large group of scholars as the actual creator of the Cossack myth on
the ground of Polish history.
Eugeniusz Koko
analyzes
Franciszek
Rawita-Gawronski s views on Cossacks and
Cossack tradition. The author stresses that
Rawita-Gawroński
worked in the period
(from the 1880s until
1930)
when there was a significant progress in the development
of Ukrainian national consciousness and national movement. E.
Koko
examines how
Rawita-Gawroński
saw these processes and how he perceived Ruthenians-Ukrainians
(in his opinion, ethnographic sources do not support the term Ukrainian ). The au¬
thor notes that with the deterioration of Polish-Ukrainian conflict, the
Ruthenian
image
became negative, because Rawita shaped his opinion on
Ruthenians
to a large extent
through the prism of their attitude to Poland. Also interesting is the evolution of Rawita s
views on the
Ruthenians
of
Galicia.
Before World War I, he saw them as people of a very
primitive culture, reluctant and even hostile towards Poles. This opinion clearly changed
in the interwar years. The majority of features previously attributed to the
Ruthenians
was then transferred to the Ukrainians, whom he identified with the representatives of
political groups hostile towards Poland.
In the next text
-
History and power in the Right-Bank Ukraine in the nineteenth
and early twentieth century
—
the creation of legitimizing myths ,
Valentyna
Shandra
tackled the issue of the Russian Empire authorities using historical knowledge in order
to legitimize their right to the Right-bank Ukraine. As she argues, scholarly and histori¬
cal associations of local intellectual elite were established for that very purpose. They
472
were to prove, basing on historical sources, that these areas had been Russian since time
immemorial. The author also records and analyzes initiatives calculated on the suppres¬
sion of pro-Ukrainian feelings in these areas, such as building temples and monuments
visualizing common roots, including those of religious nature, of Ukrainians and Rus¬
sians.
In his text, Vasyl Pedych presents the discussion in the Ukrainian historiography
of
Galicia
in the
1920s
and
1930s.
The author identified detailed views of the main de¬
baters
-
M. Korduba, S. Smal-Stotskyi, M. Chubatyi, W. Lypynskyi, S. Tomashivskyi
-
analyzing, among others: issues such as the ethnogenesis of the Ukrainian people,
first Ukrainian texts of a state and political character or Polish-Ukrainian relations. He
pointed out that in these discussions, mostly inspired by ideological factors, scholarly
and critical approach was subordinated to the potential use of the historical material in
legitimizing the nation-state aspirations of Ukrainians.
The text by Kostiantyn Ivanhorodskyi is devoted to the place of the Union of Lublin
in
1569
in historiography. The author stresses that there is no synthetizing discourse
on the subject. There is also practically no dialogue of Polish and Ukrainian historians
concerning the Union. It is therefore important to carry out a thorough research in order
to overcome myths and stereotypes accumulated over time. This includes the myth of
the annexation of Ukraine by Poland, proclaimed by Soviet historians, which is found
even today not only in the consciousness of Ukrainians, but also in school textbooks.
Thus, today there is a need for a new look at this aspect of our common history from
a scholarly point of view, free of political and ideological connotations.
The volume closes with a text by
Dorota Malczewska-Pawelec,
who presents the
strategies and schemes of interpretation in the Marxist syntheses of Polish history in
reference to the phenomenon of the genesis of Cossacks. The analysis is based on seven
studies from years
1951—1987.
The reflection concentrates on the most important issues
which each of the analyzed syntheses had to address (Who were the Cossacks? From
which nationality/social strata do they originate? What circumstances led to the crea¬
tion of this community and defined its character?). This provides a basis for the recon¬
struction of the fundamental Marxist model of interpretation of Cossacks as well as its
subsequent modifications.
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1089835825 |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV040404673 |
| classification_rvk | KD 6900 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)815889505 (DE-599)BVBBV040404673 |
| discipline | Slavistik |
| era | Geschichte 1800-2000 gnd |
| era_facet | Geschichte 1800-2000 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02602nam a2200529 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV040404673</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220419 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">120905s2012 |||| 00||| pol d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9788376293530</subfield><subfield code="9">978-83-7629-353-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)815889505</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV040404673</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">pol</subfield><subfield code="a">ukr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-Re13</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-M352</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">KD 6900</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)72322:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">7,41</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Mity i stereotypy w dziejach Polski i Ukrainy w XIX i XX wieku</subfield><subfield code="c">pod red. Andrzeja Czyżewskiego ...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Warszawa [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Inst. Pamięci Narodowej</subfield><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">494 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zsfassung in engl. Sprache u.d.T.: Myths and stereotypes in the history of Poland and Ukraine in the nineteenth and twentieth century</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Beitr. teilw. poln., teilw. ukrain. - Teilw. in kyrill. Schr., ukrain.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1800-2000</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Mythos</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4075159-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Stereotyp</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4057329-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ukraine</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4061496-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Polen</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4046496-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Polen</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4046496-9</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Ukraine</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4061496-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Mythos</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4075159-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Stereotyp</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4057329-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1800-2000</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Czyżewski, Andrzej</subfield><subfield code="d">1980-</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1089835825</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">HEBIS Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025257795&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Passau</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025257795&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Klappentext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025257795&sequence=000006&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-025257795</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">900</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09034</subfield><subfield code="g">477</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">900</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0904</subfield><subfield code="g">477</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">900</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0904</subfield><subfield code="g">438</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">900</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09034</subfield><subfield code="g">438</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Ukraine (DE-588)4061496-7 gnd Polen (DE-588)4046496-9 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Ukraine Polen |
| id | DE-604.BV040404673 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T00:23:18Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9788376293530 |
| language | Polish Ukrainian |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-025257795 |
| oclc_num | 815889505 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-Re13 DE-BY-UBR DE-12 DE-739 DE-M352 |
| owner_facet | DE-Re13 DE-BY-UBR DE-12 DE-739 DE-M352 |
| physical | 494 S. |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| publishDateSearch | 2012 |
| publishDateSort | 2012 |
| publisher | Inst. Pamięci Narodowej |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Mity i stereotypy w dziejach Polski i Ukrainy w XIX i XX wieku pod red. Andrzeja Czyżewskiego ... Warszawa [u.a.] Inst. Pamięci Narodowej 2012 494 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Zsfassung in engl. Sprache u.d.T.: Myths and stereotypes in the history of Poland and Ukraine in the nineteenth and twentieth century Beitr. teilw. poln., teilw. ukrain. - Teilw. in kyrill. Schr., ukrain. Geschichte 1800-2000 gnd rswk-swf Mythos (DE-588)4075159-4 gnd rswk-swf Stereotyp (DE-588)4057329-1 gnd rswk-swf Ukraine (DE-588)4061496-7 gnd rswk-swf Polen (DE-588)4046496-9 gnd rswk-swf Polen (DE-588)4046496-9 g Ukraine (DE-588)4061496-7 g Mythos (DE-588)4075159-4 s Stereotyp (DE-588)4057329-1 s Geschichte 1800-2000 z DE-604 Czyżewski, Andrzej 1980- Sonstige (DE-588)1089835825 oth HEBIS Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025257795&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung UB Passau application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025257795&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Klappentext Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025257795&sequence=000006&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Abstract |
| spellingShingle | Mity i stereotypy w dziejach Polski i Ukrainy w XIX i XX wieku Mythos (DE-588)4075159-4 gnd Stereotyp (DE-588)4057329-1 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4075159-4 (DE-588)4057329-1 (DE-588)4061496-7 (DE-588)4046496-9 |
| title | Mity i stereotypy w dziejach Polski i Ukrainy w XIX i XX wieku |
| title_auth | Mity i stereotypy w dziejach Polski i Ukrainy w XIX i XX wieku |
| title_exact_search | Mity i stereotypy w dziejach Polski i Ukrainy w XIX i XX wieku |
| title_full | Mity i stereotypy w dziejach Polski i Ukrainy w XIX i XX wieku pod red. Andrzeja Czyżewskiego ... |
| title_fullStr | Mity i stereotypy w dziejach Polski i Ukrainy w XIX i XX wieku pod red. Andrzeja Czyżewskiego ... |
| title_full_unstemmed | Mity i stereotypy w dziejach Polski i Ukrainy w XIX i XX wieku pod red. Andrzeja Czyżewskiego ... |
| title_short | Mity i stereotypy w dziejach Polski i Ukrainy w XIX i XX wieku |
| title_sort | mity i stereotypy w dziejach polski i ukrainy w xix i xx wieku |
| topic | Mythos (DE-588)4075159-4 gnd Stereotyp (DE-588)4057329-1 gnd |
| topic_facet | Mythos Stereotyp Ukraine Polen |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025257795&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025257795&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=025257795&sequence=000006&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT czyzewskiandrzej mityistereotypywdziejachpolskiiukrainywxixixxwieku |