The European Court of Justice and the autonomy of the member states:
Gespeichert in:
| Weitere Verfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge ; Antwerp ; Portland
Intersentia
[2012]
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Klappentext |
| Beschreibung: | xiv, 402 Seiten |
| ISBN: | 9781780681139 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV039991162 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20180511 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 120329s2012 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781780681139 |c (hbk.) £90.00 |9 978-1-78068-113-9 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)767939974 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ353356514 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-703 |a DE-19 |a DE-12 |a DE-521 |a DE-29 |a DE-M382 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 341.2422284 | |
| 084 | |a PS 2940 |0 (DE-625)139744: |2 rvk | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The European Court of Justice and the autonomy of the member states |c Hans-W. Micklitz, Bruno de Witte (editors) |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge ; Antwerp ; Portland |b Intersentia |c [2012] | |
| 300 | |a xiv, 402 Seiten | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Europäischer Gerichtshof |0 (DE-588)5103273-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Kollision |g Recht |0 (DE-588)4341299-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Mitgliedsstaaten |0 (DE-588)4170174-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 4 | |a Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten | |
| 653 | |a Court of Justice of the European Communities | ||
| 653 | |a Conflict of laws / Jurisdiction / European Union countries | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Europäischer Gerichtshof |0 (DE-588)5103273-9 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Mitgliedsstaaten |0 (DE-588)4170174-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Kollision |g Recht |0 (DE-588)4341299-3 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Micklitz, Hans-Wolfgang |d 1949- |0 (DE-588)110189906 |4 edt | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Witte, Bruno de |d 1955- |0 (DE-588)112220053 |4 edt | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Bayreuth |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024848289&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Bayreuth |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024848289&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Klappentext |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-024848289 | ||
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |f 090511 |g 4 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |f 090512 |g 4 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |f 0904 |g 4 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804148979979517952 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | CONTENTS
Foreword
.................................................................
v
PART I.
INTRODUCTION
Judge-Made Integration?
Hans-W. Micklitz and
Hanna Schebesta
.............................. 3
1.
Introduction
.......................................................... 3
2.
Introducing the Authors Contributions
................................. 4
PART II.
THE GENERAL SHAPE OF MEMBER STATE AUTONOMY
IN THE COURT S CASE LAW
Competence and Member State Autonomy: Causality, Consequence and
Legitimacy
Paul Craig
.......................................................... 11
1.
Competence: The Allure of the Simple and the Complexity of Reality .
.. 11
2.
Competence and Member State Autonomy: Four Factors in Temporal
Perspective
.......................................................... 12
2.1.
From Rome to the SEA
........................................... 12
2.2.
From the SEA to the Treaty on European Union
................... 16
2.3.
From Maastricht to Nice
......................................... 18
2.4.
Post Nice
........................................................ 21
2.5.
Conclusion
...................................................... 25
3.
Member State Autonomy: Choice, Consequences and Legitimacy
........ 25
3.1.
The Logic of Collective Action
.................................... 26
3.2.
Output Legitimacy: Peace and Prosperity
.......................... 26
3.3.
Output Legitimacy: Externalities
................................. 27
3.4.
Output Legitimacy: Tension and Resolution
..................... 28
3.5.
Output Legitimacy: Questioning the Premise
...................... 29
3.6.
Output Legitimacy: the Balance between the Economic
and the Social
................................................... 30
Intersentia
VII
Contents
3.7.
Input Legitimacy: the Rationales for the Shift
...................... 31
4.
Conclusion
.......................................................... 34
The European Court of Justice s Approach to Primacy and European
Constitutionalism
-
Preserving the European Constitutional Order?
Fabian Amtenbrink
.................................................. 35
1.
Introductory Remarks
................................................ 35
2.
European Constitutionalism
.......................................... 38
2.1.
Terminology
.................................................... 39
2.2.
The National and European (Constitutional) Legal Orders:
Companions in Fate
............................................. 42
3.
The ECJ s Principled Approach to Primacy: a Claim of Absolute
Sovereignty in Disguise?
...............................................52
3.1.
On the ECJ s Concept of Primacy
..................................53
3.2.
Recognizing Member State s Common (Constitutional)
Legal Traditions
................................................. 56
3.3.
Recognition of National (Constitutional) Legal Standards
.......... 60
4.
Concluding Remarks
................................................. 62
The Judge s Role in European Integration
-
The Court of Justice and Its Critics
Jürgen Basedow..................................................... 65
1.
Challenges to the Legality of the European Court s Practice
............. 65
2.
Centrifugal Forces and the Functions of the Court
...................... 66
2.1.
The Legal Framework
............................................ 66
2.2.
Centrifugal Forces in the Member States
.......................... 67
2.3.
Three Functions of the Court of Justice
............................ 69
3.
The Review Function
................................................. 70
3.1.
Infringement Proceedings against Member States
.................. 70
3.2.
Legal Doctrines Furthering the Review Function
.................. 71
4.
The Impulse Function
................................................ 72
4.1.
The Synchrony of Political and Legal Action
....................... 72
4.2.
Example
1:
Admission of Foreign Students to Austrian Universities
. 73
4.3.
Example
2:
Opening National Insurance Markets
.................. 73
4.4.
Example
3:
Free Movement for Companies
........................ 74
4.5.
Summary: Legal Contributions to the Community s Mission
....... 75
5.
The Uniformity Function
............................................. 76
5.1.
The Court Confronted with a Growing Body of Fragmentary
Legislation
...................................................... 76
5.2.
Underperformance
.............................................. 76
5.3.
Overperformance
................................................ 78
Intersentia
Contents
5.4.
The Court s Insecurity
........................................... 78
6.
Conclusion
.......................................................... 79
PART III.
INTERNAL MARKET, CITIZENSHIP AND MIGRATION
How Proportionate is the Proportionality Principle? Some critical remarks
on the use and methodology of the proportionality principle in the internal
market case law of the ECJ
Norbert Reich....................................................... 83
1.
From Admiration to Frustration?
...................................... 83
2.
Widening the Scope of Application of the Fundamental Freedoms
Beyond Market Access
-
How Wide?
.................................. 85
2.1.
Beyond Market Access
........................................... 86
2.2.
No Reserved or Exempted Areas
.............................. 90
2.3.
A Broad and at the Same Time a Narrow Reading of Public
Interest Justifications
............................................ 91
3.
The Proportionality Principle as the Super-Norm ?
.................... 94
3.1.
Some Preliminary Methodological Reflections
..................... 94
3.2.
The Origin in the Early Case Law of the ECJ
....................... 95
3.3.
Possible Methodological Sophistication or Aberration? The
Different
and Sometimes Incoherent Tests of the ECJ
............... 97
3.3.1.
Examples for the autonomous balancing approach
......... 98
3.3.2.
Examples for the state margin of appreciation approach
... 100
3.3.3.
Examples for the
-
rather ambivalent
-
fundamental
rights approach
......................................... 103
3.3.4.
Examples for the quasi-legislative approach
.............. 105
4.
Where Are We Now
-
A Plea for Judicial Restraint
..................... 108
Judicial Activism or Constitutional Interaction? Policymaking by the ECJ in
the Field of Union Citizenship
Michael Dougan
.................................................... 113
1.
Introduction
........................................................ 113
2.
Some Preliminary Remarks on Judicial Activism
.................... 114
3.
A Critical Reading of the Citizenship Case Law from
1998-2008........ 122
4.
Developments in the Citizenship Case Law since
2008................. 131
5.
A More Constructive Reading of the Citizenship Case Law?
............ 139
Intersentia IX
Contents
6.
Concluding Remarks
................................................ 146
Reserved Areas of the Member States and the ECJ: the Case of Higher
Education
Dragana Damjanovic
............................................... 149
1.
Introduction
........................................................ 149
1.1.
Article
165
TFEU (ex Article
149
ЕСТ):
Education as a Reserved
Area of the Member States and the Bologna Process
.............. 149
1.2.
The Implied Powers Doctrine as the Basis of
EU
Legal Integration
within Higher Education
........................................ 152
1.3.
Aim of This Paper
.............................................. 153
2.
The Various Strands of ECJ Case Law in Higher Education
............. 153
2.1.
Professional Recognition
........................................ 153
2.2.
Student Mobility: Cross-Border Access to Higher Education
Courses
........................................................ 155
2.2.1.
The issue of student mobility within the triangle of
EU
case
law,
EU
hard law and European soft law (in particular, the
Bologna process)
......................................... 155
2.2.2.
The Austria
v
Commission and Belgium
v
Commission
student mobility cases
................................... 157
2.2.3.
Criticism against the Court
............................... 158
2.2.4.
Reaction to the Court s judgments: a quota regulation
system for medical studies
................................ 163
2.2.5.
The Bressol judgment
..................................... 163
2.2.6.
Conclusion
.............................................. 166
2.3.
Student Mobility: Cross-Border Access to Financial Support for
Education
...................................................... 166
2.4.
Building the
EU
Internal Market Based on Free Competition for
Higher Education
............................................... 169
3.
Conclusion
......................................................... 171
References
............................................................. 172
The European Court of Justice, Member State Autonomy and European
Union Citizenship: Conjunctions and Disjunctions
Dora Kostakopoulou
.............................................. 175
1.
Introduction
........................................................ 175
2.
European Union Citizenship as an Experimental Institution
........... 177
2.1. EU
Citizenship as a Fundamental Status
.......................... 180
2.2.
Family Reunification
............................................ 186
2.3.
Non-Discriminatory Restrictions
................................ 190
Intersentia
Contents
2.4.
Increased Protection of Union Citizens in the Member State of
Residence
...................................................... 192
3. EU
Citizenship and Member State Nationality: Rethinking the Link?
... 195
4.
Conclusion
......................................................... 202
PART IV.
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS
The Case of Fundamental Rights: a State of Ambivalence
Loïc
Azoulai
....................................................... 207
1.
Introduction. The Question has Changed
............................. 207
2.
Playing with the Scope of the Protection: the Liberty of the State
........ 208
3.
Designing the Constraints: the Independence of the State
.............. 211
4.
Conceptualising the Rights: the Identity of the State
................... 214
5.
Conclusion
......................................................... 217
Fundamental Rights Jurisprudence Between Member States Prerogatives
and Citizens Autonomy
Dagmar Schiek..................................................... 219
1.
Introduction
........................................................ 219
2.
The Notion of Fundamental Rights
-
Autonomy of Human Beings
...... 220
3.
The Multi-Layered Context of Fundamental Rights in the European
Union
.............................................................. 222
3.1.
Protecting Fundamental Rights Alongside Economic Integration
.. 223
3.2.
Functions of the Court s Fundamental Rights Protection
.......... 225
3.3.
Multi-Polar Dilemmas Underlying the Court s Fundamental
Rights Case Law
................................................ 227
4.
Recent ECJ Case Law Between
EU,
Citizens and Member States
......... 228
4.1.
A Quantitative Appetizer
........................................ 228
4.2.
Substantive Assessment of Some Neuralgic Fields
................. 229
4.2.1.
Assumptions and adequate fields
.......................... 229
4.2.2.
Non-discrimination and equality
......................... 231
4.2.3.
Collective labour rights between fundamental freedoms
and fundamental rights
................................... 236
5.
Conclusion
......................................................... 242
Annex: List of Cases Evaluated
.......................................... 244
A Pluralistic Europe of Rights
Marta Cartabia
.................................................... 259
1.
Introduction
........................................................ 259
Intersentia
Xl
Contents
2. The New Millennium
and the Flourishing of a Europe of Rights
......... 262
2.1.
The
Tanja Kreil
Case
............................................ 263
2.2.
The Schmidberger and Omega Cases
.............................. 264
2.3.
K.B., Richards and Tadao Maruko Cases
.......................... 265
2.4.
Cases on Terrorism
............................................. 268
2.5.
A Panoramic Overview
......................................... 269
3. ...
and of a European Court of Rights
................................ 270
4.
United in Diversity at Risk
.......................................... 272
5.
Looking for an Antidote
............................................. 275
PART V.
PROCEDURAL AUTONOMY OF THE STATES
The Procedural Autonomy of Member States and the Constraints
Stemming from the ECJ s Case Law: Is Judicial Activism Still Necessary?
Adelina Adinolfi................................................... 281
1.
Introduction
........................................................ 281
2.
The Constraints on Procedural Autonomy of the Member States:
the extent of the discretionary power of the Court in the assessment
of the adequacy of national procedures
................................ 284
3.
The Critical Reactions Caused by the Judicial Limitation of
Procedural Autonomy of Member States
............................ 286
4.
Why Limit the Procedural Autonomy of Member States?
............. 291
4.1.
Supremacy of
EU
law
........................................... 291
4.2.
Uniform Application of
EU
law
.................................. 294
4.3.
The Fundamental Right to Obtain Judicial Protection
............. 296
5.
A Tentative Paradigm to Explain the Court s Unsteady Approach in
Assessing Adequacy of National Procedural Law
...................... 299
6.
Conclusion
......................................................... 302
Why There is No Principle of Procedural Autonomy of
the Member States
Michal Bobek.......................................................
305
1.
Introduction
................................................ 305
2.
The Orthodoxy
............................................ 305
3.
The Cases
...........................................................
307
4.
The Theories
..............................................
309
5.
The Requirements
......................................... 312
5.1.
Equivalence
....................................... 312
5.2.
Effectiveness
...........................................
3I6
5.3.
Their Relationship
....................................
317
xn
Intersentia
Contents
6.
The Misunderstanding
................................................
319
7.
Conclusion
......................................................... 322
National Voice and European Loyalty. Member State Autonomy,
European Remedies and Constitutional Pluralism in
EU
Law
Daniel
Sarmiento
.................................................. 325
1.
Exit, Voice, Loyalty and the Legitimacy of the European Court
of Justice
............................................................ 326
2.
Member State Voice
................................................. 327
2.1.
Judicial Review of National Legislation
........................... 327
2.2.
Judicial Review of National Judicial Action
....................... 330
2.3.
Judicial Review of the
Pouvoir Constituant.......................
336
2.4.
Constitutional Voice and Non-Constitutional Claims
............. 338
3.
Individual Voice
.................................................... 339
4.
Autonomy through Pluralism
........................................ 342
PART VI.
CONCLUDING REMARKS
-
THE RIGHT S DIMENSION
The ECJ Between the Individual Citizen and the Member States
-
A Plea
for a Judge-Made European Law on Remedies
Hans-W. MiCKLiTZ
.................................................. 349
1.
The ECJ Between the Individual Citizen and the Autonomy of the
Member States
...................................................... 349
2.
RRP in a New European Legal Order Having Its Own Legal System.
.. 351
2.1.
The
EU
Legal Order Autonomous and/or Integrated
............... 352
2.2.
Three European Legal Orders
-
Economic, Social and Citizen?
..... 356
2.3.
A Rights Based Order
-
Economic, Fundamental, Social, Human,
Citizen Rights
.................................................. 360
3.
RRP
-
First, Second, Third
...
How Many Generations?
................ 364
3.1.
The Ambiguities of the Concept of Conferred or Attributed
Competences
................................................... 364
3.2.
A Shaky Consensus
-
The Competence Divide in RRPs
............ 366
3.3.
Beyond Consensus
-
The Horizontal Implications of RRPs
........ 369
4.
The Institutional Framework of Judge-Made European Law
on Remedies
........................................................ 373
4.1.
The Parameters: Judicial Co-operation, Organised Law
Enforcement and Legitimacy in RRPs
.............................374
4.2.
Is the Concept of Subjective Rights a Procrustean Bed?
............ 376
4.2.1.
Prevalence of
EU
economic rights over social rights
........ 377
4.2.2.
The missing
EU
collective rights
.......................... 380
Intersentia
Xlii
Contents
4.3.
Competence (Constitutional) Boundaries in the Development
of an
EU
Law on Remedies
...................................... 383
4.3.1.
The impact of the distinction between primary vs.
secondary
EU
law on RRPs
............................... 385
4.3.2.
The line between constitutional and non-constitutional
RRPs
.................................................... 388
5.
Thoughts on the Future for the
EU
Law on Remedies
De Lege
Lata
...... 392
5.1.
Constitutional Implications: a Right to Access in the Preliminary
Reference Procedure
............................................ 393
5.2.
Substantive Implications: RRPs to Counterbalance the European
Economic Order
................................................ 395
5.2.1.
From uniform application to uniform enforcement
......... 395
5.2.2.
The principle of effectiveness and the doctrine of economic
efficiency
................................................ 397
5.2.3.
Materialising the principle of equivalence
.................. 399
Index
.................................................................. 401
XIV
Intersentia
Whereas individual .Member State governments occasionally complain about
judgments ot the Court ot
Justice
ot
the European Union, especially when
those judgments curtail that state s policy autonomy in a sensitive domain,
the collectivity ot the Member State governments have agreed, in each treaty
revision so tar. to confirm and extend the tar-reaching
p nich
the Court ot
Justice possesses tor enforcing EL law. The explanation ot the paradox can only be
that, deep down, the Member States
oťthe
EL remain convinced that an effective
Court ofjusnce with strong enforcement powers is one of the salient features of
European Union law which have stood the test of time, and feel no inclination
to clip the wings
ofthat
Court for fear that this would affect the effectively^
of the European integration
proces^.
Nevertheless, the grumblings about smsjle
íudüinents.
or about the consistency and direction of the Court in particular policy
fields, have
ne1 d
indeed have become more audible
m
recent vears.
в
book deals with the perception that the Court of Justice, quite often, does not
.-
sufficient autonomy to the Member States in developing their own legal and
pohcv choices in areas where European and national competences overlap.
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author2 | Micklitz, Hans-Wolfgang 1949- Witte, Bruno de 1955- |
| author2_role | edt edt |
| author2_variant | h w m hwm b d w bd bdw |
| author_GND | (DE-588)110189906 (DE-588)112220053 |
| author_facet | Micklitz, Hans-Wolfgang 1949- Witte, Bruno de 1955- |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV039991162 |
| classification_rvk | PS 2940 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)767939974 (DE-599)BSZ353356514 |
| dewey-full | 341.2422284 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 341 - Law of nations |
| dewey-raw | 341.2422284 |
| dewey-search | 341.2422284 |
| dewey-sort | 3341.2422284 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02340nam a22004932c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV039991162</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20180511 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">120329s2012 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781780681139</subfield><subfield code="c">(hbk.) £90.00</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-78068-113-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)767939974</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BSZ353356514</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">341.2422284</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PS 2940</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139744:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The European Court of Justice and the autonomy of the member states</subfield><subfield code="c">Hans-W. Micklitz, Bruno de Witte (editors)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge ; Antwerp ; Portland</subfield><subfield code="b">Intersentia</subfield><subfield code="c">[2012]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xiv, 402 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäischer Gerichtshof</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5103273-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kollision</subfield><subfield code="g">Recht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4341299-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Mitgliedsstaaten</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4170174-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Court of Justice of the European Communities</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Conflict of laws / Jurisdiction / European Union countries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Europäischer Gerichtshof</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5103273-9</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Mitgliedsstaaten</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4170174-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Kollision</subfield><subfield code="g">Recht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4341299-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Micklitz, Hans-Wolfgang</subfield><subfield code="d">1949-</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)110189906</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Witte, Bruno de</subfield><subfield code="d">1955-</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)112220053</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Bayreuth</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024848289&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Bayreuth</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024848289&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Klappentext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-024848289</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090511</subfield><subfield code="g">4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090512</subfield><subfield code="g">4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0904</subfield><subfield code="g">4</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten |
| geographic_facet | Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten |
| id | DE-604.BV039991162 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T00:15:45Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781780681139 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-024848289 |
| oclc_num | 767939974 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-703 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-12 DE-521 DE-29 DE-M382 |
| owner_facet | DE-703 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-12 DE-521 DE-29 DE-M382 |
| physical | xiv, 402 Seiten |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| publishDateSearch | 2012 |
| publishDateSort | 2012 |
| publisher | Intersentia |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | The European Court of Justice and the autonomy of the member states Hans-W. Micklitz, Bruno de Witte (editors) Cambridge ; Antwerp ; Portland Intersentia [2012] xiv, 402 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd rswk-swf Europäischer Gerichtshof (DE-588)5103273-9 gnd rswk-swf Kollision Recht (DE-588)4341299-3 gnd rswk-swf Mitgliedsstaaten (DE-588)4170174-4 gnd rswk-swf Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten Court of Justice of the European Communities Conflict of laws / Jurisdiction / European Union countries Europäischer Gerichtshof (DE-588)5103273-9 b Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 b Mitgliedsstaaten (DE-588)4170174-4 s Kollision Recht (DE-588)4341299-3 s DE-604 Micklitz, Hans-Wolfgang 1949- (DE-588)110189906 edt Witte, Bruno de 1955- (DE-588)112220053 edt Digitalisierung UB Bayreuth application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024848289&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung UB Bayreuth application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024848289&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Klappentext |
| spellingShingle | The European Court of Justice and the autonomy of the member states Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd Europäischer Gerichtshof (DE-588)5103273-9 gnd Kollision Recht (DE-588)4341299-3 gnd Mitgliedsstaaten (DE-588)4170174-4 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)5098525-5 (DE-588)5103273-9 (DE-588)4341299-3 (DE-588)4170174-4 |
| title | The European Court of Justice and the autonomy of the member states |
| title_auth | The European Court of Justice and the autonomy of the member states |
| title_exact_search | The European Court of Justice and the autonomy of the member states |
| title_full | The European Court of Justice and the autonomy of the member states Hans-W. Micklitz, Bruno de Witte (editors) |
| title_fullStr | The European Court of Justice and the autonomy of the member states Hans-W. Micklitz, Bruno de Witte (editors) |
| title_full_unstemmed | The European Court of Justice and the autonomy of the member states Hans-W. Micklitz, Bruno de Witte (editors) |
| title_short | The European Court of Justice and the autonomy of the member states |
| title_sort | the european court of justice and the autonomy of the member states |
| topic | Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd Europäischer Gerichtshof (DE-588)5103273-9 gnd Kollision Recht (DE-588)4341299-3 gnd Mitgliedsstaaten (DE-588)4170174-4 gnd |
| topic_facet | Europäische Union Europäischer Gerichtshof Kollision Recht Mitgliedsstaaten Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024848289&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024848289&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT micklitzhanswolfgang theeuropeancourtofjusticeandtheautonomyofthememberstates AT wittebrunode theeuropeancourtofjusticeandtheautonomyofthememberstates |