International civil litigation in United States courts:
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
New York, NY
Wolters Kluwer Law & Business
2011
|
| Ausgabe: | 5. ed. |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | XXXV, 1243 S. |
| ISBN: | 9780735507555 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV039621481 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20130321 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 111007s2011 xxu |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 010 | |a 2011029530 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780735507555 |9 978-0-7355-0755-5 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)760121200 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV039621481 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a xxu |c US | ||
| 049 | |a DE-19 |a DE-M382 |a DE-355 |a DE-739 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a KF418.C48 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 347.73/5 | |
| 084 | |a PT 515 |0 (DE-625)139908: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Born, Gary |d 1955- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)133641066 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a International civil litigation in United States courts |c Gary B. Born, Peter B. Rutledge |
| 250 | |a 5. ed. | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a New York, NY |b Wolters Kluwer Law & Business |c 2011 | |
| 300 | |a XXXV, 1243 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Conflict of laws |x Civil procedure |z United States |v Cases | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Conflict of laws |x Jurisdiction |z United States |v Cases | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Civil procedure |z United States |v Cases | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Zivilprozessrecht |0 (DE-588)4117728-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 4 | |a USA | |
| 651 | 7 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Zivilprozessrecht |0 (DE-588)4117728-9 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rutledge, Peter B. |d 1970- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1025281861 |4 aut | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m SWB Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024471873&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-024471873 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804148468326858752 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | IMAGE 1
CONTENTS
PREFACE TO THE FOURTH EDITION IXPREFACE TO THE FIFTH EDITION
XIACKNOWLEDGMENT XIII PART ONE JUDICIAL JURISDICTION
1
JURISDICTION OF U.S. COURTS OVER SUBJECT MATTER IN INTERNATIONAL
DISPUTES 5
A. INTRODUCTION 5
1. PLENARY STATE SUBJECT MATTER AND LEGISLATIVE JURISDICTION 5
2. LIMITED FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE AND SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION 5
A. LIMITED FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY UNDER ARTICLE I 5
B. LIMITED FEDERAL JUDICIAL AUTHORITY UNDER ARTICLE III 7
3. OVERVIEW OF FEDERAL SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION IN INTERNATIONAL
CASES 7 A. ARTICLE ILL S GRANTS OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION 7
B. STATUTORY GRANTS OF FEDERAL SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION 8
C. REMOVAL 9
D. PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS RELEVANT TO FEDERAL SUBJECT MATTER
JURISDICTION 9
4. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN U.S. STATE AND FEDERAL LAW 10
A. THE ERIE DOCTRINE 10
B. SUBSTANTIVE FEDERAL COMMON LAW 11
5. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTERNATIONAL LAW AND U.S. LAW 13
A. INTERNATIONAL LAW 14
B. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS AND U.S. LAW 15 C.
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW AND U.S. LAW 17 D.
PRESUMPTION THAT CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION IS CONSISTENT WITH
INTERNATIONAL LAW 18
6. SEPARATION OF POWERS CONSIDERATIONS 18
B. ALIENAGE JURISDICTION OF FEDERAL COURTS 21
1. INTRODUCTION AND HISTORICAL BACKGROUND 21
XVII
IMAGE 2
CONTENTS
2. CONTEMPORARY STATUTORY GRANTS OF ALIENAGE JURISDICTION 22
A. SECTION 1332(A)(2) 22
B. SECTION 1332(A) (3) 23
3. SELECTED MATERIALS ON ALIENAGE JURISDICTION 25
HERCULES INC. V. DYNAMIC EXPORT CORP. 25
NOTES ON HERCULES V. DYNAMIC 26
C. FEDERAL QUESTION JURISDICTION IN INTERNATIONAL CASES 30
1. INTRODUCTION AND HISTORICAL BACKGROUND 31
A. ARTICLE ILL S GRANT OF FEDERAL QUESTION JURISDICTION 31
B. STATUTORY GRANTS OF FEDERAL QUESTION JURISDICTION 31
2. JURISDICTION OF FEDERAL COURTS UNDER THE ALIEN TORT STATUTE 33
A. THE ALIEN TORT STATUTE 33
B. FILARTIGA AND TEL-OREN 33
C. SOSA V. ALVARAZ-MACHAIN 35
FILARTIGA V. PENA-IRALA 36
SOSA V. ALVAREZ-MACHAIN 38
TORTURE VICTIM PROTECTION ACT 47
NOTES ON FILARTIGA, SOSA, AND TVPA 47
3. FEDERAL QUESTION JURISDICTION IN CASES ARISING UNDER INTERNATIONAL
LAW AND FEDERAL COMMON LAW 62
A. INTERNATIONAL LAW REGARDED AS FEDERAL LAW 62
B. SELECTED MATERIALS ON FEDERAL QUESTION JURISDICTION OVER CLAIMS BASED
ON INTERNATIONAL LAW 63
RESTATEMENT (THIRD) FOREIGN RELATIONS LAIV OF THE UNITED STATES §111
(1987) 63 FILARTIGA V. PENA-IRALA 63
SEQUIHUA V. TEXACO, INC. 63
NOTES ON THIRD RESTATEMENT §111, FILARTIGA, AND SEQUIHUA 65
4. SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY AND JUDICIAL JURISDICTION UNDER THE FOREIGN
SOVEREIGN IMMUNITIES ACT 70
VERLINDEN BV V. CENTRAL BANK OF NIGERIA 71
NOTES ON VERLINDEN 76
JURISDICTION OF U.S. COURTS OVER PARTIES TO INTERNATIONAL DISPUTES 81
A. INTRODUCTION AND HISTORICAL BACKGROUND 81
1. STATUTORY AND CONSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR EXERCISE OF PERSONAL
JURISDICTION 81
A. STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION FOR THE EXERCISE OF JUDICIAL JURISDICTION 82
(1) STATE LONG-ARM STATUTES 82
(2) FEDERAL LONG-ARM STATUTES AND RULES 83
B. DUE PROCESS LIMITS ON JUDICIAL JURISDICTION: HISTORICAL OVERVIEW AND
VOCABULARY 83
(1) TERRITORIAL SOVEREIGNTY AND PENNOYER V. NEFF 84
(2) INTERNATIONAL SHOE AND MINIMUM CONTACTS 86
(3) HANSON V. DENCKLA AND PURPOSEFUL AVAILMENT 87
(4) WORLD-WIDE VOLKSWAGEN AND CONTEMPORARY DUE PROCESS ANALYSIS:
PURPOSEFUL CONTACTS AND REASONABLENESS 88
IMAGE 3
CONTENTS XIX
(5) THE REEMERGENCE OF TERRITORIAL SOVEREIGNTY: ASAHI, BURNHAM, AND
NICASTRO 88
C. GENERAL AND SPECIFIC JURISDICTION 90
D. PROCEDURAL POSTURE OF LITIGATION OVER PERSONAL JURISDICTION 90
2. SELECTED MATERIALS ON THE FOUNDATIONS OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION 91
PENNOYER V. NEFF 91
RESTATEMENT (FIRST) CONFLICT OF LAWS §47 (1934) 94
WORLD-WIDE VOLKSWAGEN CORP. V. WOODSON 94
RESTATEMENT (THIRD) FOREIGN RELATIONS LAW OF THE UNITED STATES §421
(1987) 96 FRENCH CIVIL CODE ARTICLE 14 96
EUROPEAN COUNCIL REGULATION 44/2001 96
NOTES ON PENNOYER, WORLD-WIDE VOLKSWAGEN, AND LEGISLATIVE MATERIALS 96
B. GENERAL JURISDICTION OF U.S. COURTS IN INTERNATIONAL CASES 108
1. GENERAL JURISDICTION BASED ON NATIONALITY, DOMICILE, OR RESIDENCE OF
THE DEFENDANT 109
BLACKMER V. UNITED STATES 109
NOTES ON BLACKMER 110
2. GENERAL JURISDICTION BASED ON INCORPORATION OR REGISTRATION TO DO
BUSINESS 113
A. INCORPORATION 113
B. REGISTRATION OR QUALIFICATION TO DO BUSINESS 114
3. GENERAL JURISDICTION BASED ON CONSENT OR WAIVER 115
A. PROROGATION AGREEMENTS OR NONEXCLUSIVE FORUM SELECTION AGREEMENTS 115
B. IMPLIED SUBMISSIONS TO JURISDICTION 116
4. GENERAL JURISDICTION BASED ON PRESENCE OR CONTINUOUS AND
SYSTEMATIC BUSINESS ACTIVITIES WITHIN THE FORUM 116
A. LEGISLATIVE AUTHORIZATION 116
B. DUE PROCESS CLAUSE 117
C. SELECTED MATERIALS ON PRESENCE AS A BASIS FOR GENERAL JURISDICTION
118 HELICOPTEROS NACIONALES DE COLOMBIA V. HALL 118
ADAMS V. UNIONE MEDITERRANEA DI SICURTA 121
NOTES ON HELICOPTEROS NACIONALES AND ADAMS 122
5. GENERAL JURISDICTION BASED ON PERSONAL SERVICE DURING THE TRANSITORY
PRESENCE OF THE DEFENDANT WITHIN THE FORUM 129
C.S.B. COMMODITIES, INC. V. URBAN TRENDS (HK) LTD. 129
OYUELA V. SEACOR MARINE (NIGERIA), INC. 132
NOTES ON CSB COMMODITIES AND OYUELA 133
C. SPECIFIC JURISDICTION OF U.S. COURTS OVER FOREIGN DEFENDANTS 137
1. SPECIFIC JURISDICTION IN INTERNATIONAL PRODUCT LIABILITY AND TORT
CASES 138
A. PURPOSEFUL CONTACTS AND THE STREAM OF COMMERCE DOCTRINE 138
B. REASONABLENESS 139
C. DEFINING THE FORUM STATE : A PRELIMINARY VIEW 140
ASAHI METAL INDUSTRY CO. V. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, SOLANO COUNTY
140 /. MCINTYRE MACHINERY, LTD. V. NICASTRO 144
NOTES ON ASAHI AND NICASTRO 150
2. SPECIFIC JURISDICTION IN INTERNATIONAL CONTRACT DISPUTES 162
AFRAM EXPORT CORP. V. METALLURGIKI HALYPS, SA 163
IMAGE 4
^JJ CONTENTS
BENTON V. CAMECO CORP. 165
NOTES ON AFRAM EXPORT AND BENTON 169
D. JURISDICTION BASED ON CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS OR AGENCY RELATIONSHIPS
175 1. PERSONAL JURISDICTION BASED ON ALTER EGO STATUS 176
A. LAW GOVERNING ALTER EGO STATUS 176
B. CANNON MANUFACTURING: THE IMPORTANCE OF CORPORATE FORMALITIES 178 C.
ALTERNATIVE ALTER EGO STANDARDS 179
D. SELECTED MATERIALS ON THE APPLICATION OF ALTER EGO DOCTRINE IN
INTERNATIONAL CASES 180
IN RE TELECTRONICS PAPER SYSTEMS, INC. 181
NOTES ON TELECTRONICS 184
2. PERSONAL JURISDICTION BASED ON AGENCY RELATIONSHIP 190
A. LAW GOVERNING AGENCY RELATIONSHIP FOR JURISDICTIONAL PURPOSES 190 B.
AGENCY STANDARDS FOR JURISDICTIONAL PURPOSES 190
C. SELECTED MATERIALS ON AGENCY AS A BASIS FOR PERSONAL JURISDICTION IN
INTERNATIONAL CASES 191
FRUMMER V. HILTON HOTELS INTERNATIONAL 192
WIWA V. ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PETROLEUM CO. 194
CARTWRIGHT V. FOKKER AIRCRAFT U.S.A., INC. 198
NOTES ON HILTON HOTELS, WIWA, AND FOKKER 199
E. PERSONAL JURISDICTION IN FEDERAL COURTS: FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE 4 AND THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSES 203
1. INTRODUCTION 203
A. FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 4: AMENABILITY AND MANNER OF SERVICE
DISTINGUISHED 204
B. RULE 4(K) S JURISDICTIONAL GRANTS: AN OVERVIEW 204
C. NO FEDERAL PERSONAL JURISDICTION WITHOUT LEGISLATIVE AUTHORIZATION:
OMNI CAPITAL 204
D. DUE PROCESS LIMITS: STATE OR NATIONAL CONTACTS? 205
2. FEDERAL LONG-ARM STATUTES GRANTING JURISDICTION BASED ON A FOREIGN
DEFENDANT S NATIONAL CONTACTS 206
PINKER V. ROCHE HOLDINGS, LTD. 207
NOTES ON PINKER 209
3. BORROWED STATE LONG-ARM STATUTES UNDER RULE 4(K)(L)(A) AND THE DUE
PROCESS CLAUSES 215
4. PERSONAL JURISDICTION UNDER RULE 4(K) (2) 216
FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 217
UNITED STATES V. SZIRISS AMERICAN BANK, LTD. 217
ADAMS V. UNIONE MEDITERRANEA DI SICURTA 221
NOTES ON RULE 4(K), SURISS AMERICAN BANK, AND ADAMS 221
FOREIGN SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY AND JURISDICTION OF U.S. COURTS OVER FOREIGN
STATES 231
A. INTRODUCTION 231
1. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND 231
2. THE FOREIGN SOVEREIGN IMMUNITIES ACT OF 1976: OVERVIEW 234
IMAGE 5
CONTENTS
XXI
3. INTERNATIONAL RECOGNITION OF THE RESTRICTIVE THEORY OF FOREIGN
SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY 235
4. SELECTED HISTORICAL MATERIALS CONCERNING FOREIGN SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY
236 THE SCHOONER EXCHANGE V. MCFADDON 236
BERIZZI BROS. CO. V. SS PESARO 238
REPUBLIC OF MEXICO V. HOFFMAN (THE BAJA CALIFORNIA) 239
LETTER OF ACTING LEGAL ADVISER, JACK B. TATE, TO DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
MAY 19, 1952 240
FOREIGN SOVEREIGN IMMUNITIES ACT OF 1976 241
REPUBLIC OF AUSTRIA V. ALTMANN 241
U.N. CONVENTION ON JURISDICTION IMMUNITIES OF STATES AND THEIR PROPERTY
245 NOTES ON SCHOONER EXCHANGE, PESARO, REPUBLIC OF MEXICO, TATE LETTER,
FSIA, ALTMANN, AND U.N. STATE IMMUNITIES CONVENTION 245
B. ENTITIES ENTITLED TO IMMUNITY UNDER THE FSIA 250
1. FOREIGN STATES PROPER 251
2. FOREIGN STATE POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS 252
3. AGENCIES AND INSTRUMENTALITIES OF FOREIGN STATES 252
4. SEPARATE LEGAL IDENTITIES OF FOREIGN GOVERNMENT ENTITIES AND GROUNDS
FOR DISREGARDING 253
5. FOREIGN HEADS OF STATE AND STATE OFFICIALS 254
6. SELECTED MATERIALS ON FOREIGN STATE ENTITIES 254
DOLE FOOD CO. V. PATRICKSON 254
FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK V. BANCO PARA EL COMERCIO EXTERIOR DE CUBA 257
SAMANATAR V. YOUSUEF 261
NOTES ON DOLE FOOD, BANCEC AND SAMANATAR 265
C. BASES FOR JUDICIAL JURISDICTION OVER FOREIGN STATES UNDER THE FSIA
276
1. COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY WITH A U.S. NEXUS 277
A. DEFINITION OF COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY 278
REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA V. WELTOVER, INC. 279
MOL, INC. V. PEOPLE S REPUBLIC OF BANGLADESH 283
NOTES ON WELTOVER AND MOL 284
B. THE BASED UPON AND IN CONNECTION REQUIREMENTS 288
SAUDI ARABIA V. NELSON 289
NOTES ON NELSON 297
C. THE NEXUS REQUIREMENTS 299
REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA V. WELTOVER, INC. 300
SAUDI ARABIA V. NELSON 301
NOTES ON WELTOVER AND NELSON 301
2. NONCOMMERCIAL TORTS OCCURRING WITHIN THE UNITED STATES 308
A. SITUS REQUIREMENT FOR NONCOMMERCIAL TORTS 310
IN RE SEDCO, INC. 310
OLSEN EX REL. SHELDON V. GOVERNMENT OF MEXICO 311
NOTES ON SEDCO AND OLSEN EX REL. SHELDON 313
B. THE DISCRETIONARY FUNCTION EXCLUSION FOR NONCOMMERCIAL TORTS 314 IN
RE SEDCO, INC. 316
LETELIER V. REPUBLIC OF CHILE 316
NOTES ON SEDCO AND LETELIER 317
C. THE SCOPE OF EMPLOYMENT REQUIREMENT 319
LIU V. REPUBLIC OF CHINA 320
NOTES ON LIU V. REPUBLIC OF CHINA 322
IMAGE 6
CONTENTS
3. EXPROPRIATION WITH A U.S. NEXUS 324
SIDERMAN DE BLAKE V. REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA 324
NOTES ON SIDERMAN DE BLAKE 328
4. WAIVER OF SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY 335
VERLINDEN BV V. CENTRAL BANK OF NIGERIA 337
CARGILL INT % SA V. M/T PAVEL DYBENKO 340
NOTES ON VERLINDEN AND CARGILL 342
5. TERRORISM-RELATED ACTIVITIES 351
PRICE V. SOCIALIST PEOPLE S LIBYAN ARAB JAMAHIRIYA 353
NOTES ON PRICE 356
PART TWO CHOICE OF FORUM
FORUM NON CONVENIENS IN INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION 365
A. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 366
1. COMMON LAW ORIGINS OF FORUM NON CONVENIENS DOCTRINE 366
2. GULF OIL CO. V. GILBERT AND KOSTER V. AMERICAN LUMBERMENS MUTUAL
CASUALTY CO. 369
3. SECTION 1404(A) -DOMESTIC FORUM NON CONVENIENS STATUTE 371
B. THE MODERN FORUM NON CONVENIENS DOCTRINE: BASIC PRINCIPLES 372
PIPER AIRCRAFT CO. V. REYNO 373
DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY V. CASTRO ALFARO 378
NOTES ON PIPER AND CASTRO ALFARO 384
C. DEFERENCE TO THE PLAINTIFFS CHOICE OF FORUM 394
IRAGORRI V. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP. 394
NOTES ON IRAGORRI 397
D. THE PRIVATE AND PUBLIC INTEREST FACTORS 408
PIPER AIRCRAFT CO. V. REYNO 408
HOWE V. GOLDCORP INVESTMENTS, LTD. 408
HARRISON V. WYETH LABORATORIES DIVISION OF AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS
CORPORATION 412
NOTES ON PIPER, HOWE, AND WYETH 414
E. THE ADEQUATE ALTERNATIVE FORUM REQUIREMENT AND PUBLIC POLICY
RESTRICTIONS 426
1. ADEQUATE ALTERNATIVE FORUM REQUIREMENT 426
2. PUBLIC POLICY AS A BASIS FOR DENYING FORUM NON CONVENIENS DISMISSALS
426 3. CONDITIONS ON DISMISSALS 428
4. SELECTED MATERIALS ON ADEQUATE ALTERNATIVE FORUMS, PUBLIC POLICY, AND
CONDITIONS 428
IN RE UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION GAS PLANT DISASTER AT BHOPAL, INDIA IN
DECEMBER, 1984 429
HOWE V. GOLDCORP INVESTMENTS, LTD. 431
LAKER AIRWAYS LTD. V. PAN AMERICAN WORLD AIRWAYS 431
HARRISON V. WYETH LABORATORIES 434
WIWA V. ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PETROLEUM CO. 435
IMAGE 7
CONTENTS XXIII
ECUADORIAN LEY 55 436
MODEL BLOCKING STATUTE ADOPTED BY PARLATINO 436
NOTES ON BHOPAL, HOWE, LAKER, WYETH, WIWA, AND LEGISLATIVE MATERIALS 437
F. THE CONTEMPORARY FORUM NON CONVENIENS DOCTRINE: APPLICABLE LAW AND
THE ERIE DOCTRINE 453
SEQUIHUA V. TEXACO, INC. 454
NOTES ON SEQUIHUA 454
G. VENUE IN INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION IN U.S. COURTS 458
INTERNATIONAL FORUM SELECTION AGREEMENTS 461
A. INTRODUCTION AND HISTORICAL BACKGROUND 462
1. EXCLUSIVE AND NONEXCLUSIVE FORUM SELECTION AGREEMENTS 462
2. REASONS FOR ENTERING INTO FORUM SELECTION AGREEMENTS 463
3. HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF ENFORCEABILITY OF FORUM SELECTION
AGREEMENTS 464
A. HISTORIC U.S. COMMON LAW RULE THAT FORUM SELECTION AGREEMENTS ARE
UNENFORCEABLE 465
B. REJECTION OF THE HISTORIC RULE THAT FORUM SELECTION AGREEMENTS ARE
UNENFORCEABLE 465
C. RESTATEMENT (SECOND) CONFLICT OF LAWS 467
D. HAGUE CONVENTION ON CHOICE OF COURT AGREEMENTS 468
B. CONTEMPORARY APPROACHES TO FORUM SELECTION AGREEMENTS IN
INTERNATIONAL CASES 468
1. CONTEMPORARY APPROACHES TO ENFORCEABILITY OF FORUM SELECTION
AGREEMENTS 469
A. FORUM SELECTION AGREEMENTS PER SE UNENFORCEABLE 469
B. FORUM NON CONVENIENS ANALYSIS 470
C. FORUM SELECTION AGREEMENTS ENFORCED IF REASONABLE 470
D. FORUM SELECTION AGREEMENTS ENFORCED AS CONTRACTS 471
E. NEW YORK GENERAL OBLIGATION LAW §5-1402 471
2. FORUM SELECTION AGREEMENTS INVOLVING CONSUMERS AND INSUREDS 472 3.
SELECTED MATERIALS ON APPROACHES TO THE ENFORCEABILITY OF INTERNATIONAL
FORUM SELECTION AGREEMENTS 472
KAHN V. TAZWELL 472
MONTANA CODE ANNOTATED 474
THE BREMEN V. ZAPATA OFF-SHORE CO. 474
SMITH, VALENTINO & SMITH, INC. V. SUPERIOR COURT 478
NEW YORK GENERAL OBLIGATIONS LAW §§5-1401, 1402 480
EUROPEAN UNION COUNCIL REGULATION 44/2001, ART. 23 480
HAGUE CONVENTION ON CHOICE OF COURT AGREEMENTS 480
NOTES ON TAZWELL, BREMEN, SMITH, AND LEGISLATIVE MATERIALS 480
C. GROUNDS FOR RESISTING ENFORCEMENT OF FORUM SELECTION AGREEMENT 486 1.
INTRODUCTION 486
2. DEFECTS IN FORMATION AND OTHER CONTRACT LAW DEFENSES AS GROUNDS FOR
RESISTING ENFORCEMENT OF FORUM SELECTION AGREEMENTS 487
COLONIAL LEASING CO. OF NEW ENGLAND V. PUGH BROTHERS GARAGE 487
IMAGE 8
CONTENTS
CARNIVAL CRUISE LINES, INC. V. SHUTE 488
EUROPEAN UNION COUNCIL REGULATION 44/2001, ARTS. 8-14, 15-17, 18-21 & 23
492
HAGUE CONVENTION ON CHOICE OF COURT AGREEMENTS, ARTS. 2, 3, 5 & 6 492
NOTES ON COLONIAL LEASING, CARNIVAL CRUISE, AND LEGISLATIVE MATERIALS
492 3. UNREASONABLENESS AS A GROUND FOR RESISTING ENFORCEMENT OF
EXCLUSIVE AND NONEXCLUSIVE FORUM SELECTION AGREEMENTS 499
A. UNREASONABLENESS OR INCONVENIENCE AS GROUNDS FOR RESISTING
ENFORCEMENT OF EXCLUSIVE FORUM SELECTION AGREEMENT 499 B.
UNREASONABLENESS OR INCONVENIENCE AS GROUNDS FOR RESISTING ENFORCEMENT
OF NONEXCLUSIVE FORUM SELECTION AGREEMENT 501 C. SELECTED MATERIALS
RELATING TO UNREASONABLENESS AND INCONVENIENCE 502
COPPERWELD STEEL CO. V. DEMAG-MANNESMANN-BOEHLER 502
NEW YORK GENERAL OBLIGATIONS LAW §5-1402 504
EUROPEAN UNION COUNCIL REGULATION 44/2001, ART. 23 504
HAGUE CONVENTION ON CHOICE OF COURT AGREEMENTS 504
NOTES ON COPPERWELD AND LEGISLATIVE MATERIALS 504
4. PUBLIC POLICY AS A GROUND FOR RESISTING ENFORCEMENT OF FORUM
SELECTION AGREEMENT 511
A. INTRODUCTION 511
B. SOURCES OF PUBLIC POLICY 512
C. SELECTED MATERIALS ON PUBLIC POLICY 514
THE BREMEN V. ZAPATA OFF-SHORE CO. 514
RICHARDS V. LLOYD S OF LONDON 515
NOTES ON BREMEN AND RICHARDS 520
D. ENFORCEABILITY OF FORUM SELECTION AGREEMENTS: APPLICABLE LAW IN U.S.
COURTS 528
1. INTRODUCTION 528
2. APPROACHES TO SELECTING LAW APPLICABLE TO ENFORCEABILITY OF FORUM
SELECTION AGREEMENTS 529
A. BREMEN: A FEDERAL COMMON LAW RULE GOVERNING ENFORCEABILITY OF FORUM
SELECTION AGREEMENTS IN ADMIRALTY CASES 529
B. SECTION 1404(A) GOVERNS ENFORCEABILITY IN FEDERAL COURTS OF FORUM
SELECTION AGREEMENTS SELECTING OTHER FEDERAL FORUMS 530 C. ERIE
PROBLEMS: DOES STATE OR FEDERAL LAW GOVERN ENFORCEABILITY OF FORUM
SELECTION AGREEMENTS IN FEDERAL DIVERSITY ACTIONS? 531
D. CHOICE-OF-LAW RULES APPLICABLE TO SELECT LAW GOVERNING ENFORCEABILITY
OF FORUM SELECTION AGREEMENTS 532
E. CHOICE OF LAW UNDER PROPOSED HAGUE CHOICE OF COURT AGREEMENTS
CONVENTION 532
3. SELECTED MATERIALS ON LAW APPLICABLE TO ENFORCEABILITY OF FORUM
SELECTION AGREEMENTS 533
ROYAL BED & SPRING CO. V. FAMOSSUL INDUSTRIA E COMERCIO DE MOVEIS LTDA
533
INSTRUMENTATION ASSOCIATES, INC. V. MADSEN ELECTRONICS (CANADA) LTD. 536
EUROPEAN UNION COUNCIL REGULATION 44/2001, ART. 23 538
NOTES ON ROYAL BED AND MADSEN ELECTRONICS 538
E. SCOPE OF FORUM SELECTION AGREEMENTS 544
IMAGE 9
CONTENTS XXV
PARALLEL PROCEEDINGS: LIS ALIBI PENDENS AND ANTISUIT INJUNCTIONS 547
A. INTRODUCTION TO PARALLEL PROCEEDINGS 548
B. THE LIS ALIBI PENDENS DOCTRINE 548
1. INTRODUCTION 548
2. COLORADO RIVER: UNFLAGGING OBLIGATION TO EXERCISE JURISDICTION 549
3. LANDIS: STAYS WITHIN THE DISTRICT COURT S SOUND DISCRETION 551
4. QUACKENBUSH: UNFLAGGING OBLIGATION REAFFIRMED 551
5. SELECTED MATERIALS ON LIS ALIBI PENDENS 552
INGERSOLL MILLING MACHINE CO. V. GRANGER 552
CONTINENTAL TIME CORP. V. SWISS CREDIT BANK 555
HAGUE CHOICE OF COURT AGREEMENTS CONVENTION 557
ALI S PROPOSED FEDERAL FOREIGN JUDGMENTS RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT ACT
§11 557
NOTES ON INGERSOLL, CONTINENTAL TIME, AND LEGISLATIVE MATERIALS 557 C.
ANTISUIT INJUNCTIONS 567
1. STANDARDS GOVERNING FOREIGN ANTISUIT INJUNCTIONS IN U.S. COURTS 568
A. DECISIONS APPLYING STRINGENT LIMITS ON ISSUANCE OF FOREIGN ANTISUIT
INJUNCTIONS 568
B. DECISIONS APPLYING MORE FLEXIBLE STANDARDS TO ISSUANCE OF FOREIGN
ANTISUIT INJUNCTIONS 569
2. SELECTED MATERIALS ON FOREIGN ANTISUIT INJUNCTIONS IN U.S. COURTS 569
CHINA TRADE & DEVELOPMENT CORP. V. MV CHOONG YONG 570
KAEPA, INC. V. ACHILLES CORP. 573
NOTES ON CHINA TRADE AND KAEPA 576
PART THREE LEGISLATIVE JURISDICTION AND CHOICE OF LAW
LEGISLATIVE JURISDICTION 591
A. INTERNATIONAL LAW LIMITS ON LEGISLATIVE JURISDICTION 591
1. INTRODUCTION AND HISTORICAL BACKGROUND 591
2. CONTEMPORARY INTERNATIONAL LAW LIMITS ON LEGISLATIVE JURISDICTION:
THE EFFECTS TEST AND EROSION OF TERRITORIAL LIMITS 595
3. SELECTED MATERIALS CONCERNING THE EVOLUTION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW
LIMITS ON LEGISLATIVE JURISDICTION 598
/ STORY, COMMENTARIES ON THE CONFLICT OF LAWS §§18, 20 & 23 (2D ED.
1841) 598 RESTATEMENT (FIRST) CONFLICT OF LAWS §§55, 63 & 65 (1934) 598
RESTATEMENT (SECOND) FOREIGN RELATIONS LAW OF THE UNITED STATES §§17,
18, 30, 33, 39 & 40 (1965) 598
RESTATEMENT (SECOND) CONFLICT OF LAWS §9 (1971) 598
RESTATEMENT (THIRD) FOREIGN RELATIONS LAW OF THE UNITED STATES §§402,
403 & 441 (1987) 598
NOTES ON STORY S COMMENTARIES AND RESTATEMENTS 598
IMAGE 10
XXVI CONTENTS
B. INTERNATIONAL LAW LIMITS ON LEGISLATIVE JURISDICTION IN U.S. COURTS
604 1. U.S. FEDERAL LAW PREVAILS OVER INCONSISTENT JURISDICTIONAL LIMITS
OF CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW IN U.S. COURTS 604
2. PRESUMPTIONS THAT CONGRESS HAS NOT VIOLATED INTERNATIONAL LAW AND HAS
NOT EXTENDED U.S. LAW EXTRATERRITORIALLY 605
3. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN U.S. STATE LAW AND JURISDICTIONAL LIMITS OF
CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW 605
C. CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS ON LEGISLATIVE JURISDICTION IN U.S. COURTS
606 1. CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITS ON FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE JURISDICTION 606
UNITED STATES V. DAVIS 607
NOTES ON UNITED STATES V. DAVIS 609
2. CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITS ON STATE LEGISLATIVE JURISDICTION 613
A. HISTORIC CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITS 613
HOME INSURANCE CO. V. DICK 614
NOTES ON DICK 616
B. CONTEMPORARY CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITS ON STATE LEGISLATIVE JURISDICTION
618 (I) DUE PROCESS LIMITATIONS ON STATE CHOICE OF LAW 619
ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO. V. HAGUE 620
NOTES ON ALLSTATE 627
(II) FOREIGN COMMERCE AND OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS ON STATE
LEGISLATIVE JURISDICTION 630
AMERICAN INSURANCE ASSOCIATION V. GARAMENDI 633
NOTES ON GARAMENDI 637
8
CHOICE OF LAW IN INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION 645
A. APPLICATION OF FEDERAL STATUTES IN INTERNATIONAL CASES 645
1. DETERMINING THE TERRITORIAL REACH OF FEDERAL LEGISLATION IN
INTERNATIONAL CASES: THE PROBLEM OF SILENT OR AMBIGUOUS STATUTES 645 2.
HISTORICAL INTRODUCTION: THE TERRITORIALITY PRESUMPTION 646
AMERICAN BANANA CO. V. UNITED FRUIT CO. 651
LAURITZEN V. LARSEN 654
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION V. ARABIAN AMERICAN OIL CO. 659
NOTES ON AMERICAN BANANA, LAURITZEN, AND ARAMCO 664
3. CONTEMPORARY APPROACH TO EXTRATERRITORIAL APPLICATION OF FEDERAL
ANTITRUST STATUTES 672
A. OVERVIEW OF U.S. ANTITRUST LAWS 673
B. FROM AMERICAN BANANAS TERRITORIALITY PRESUMPTION TO ALCOA S
EFFECTS/INTENT TEST 673
UNITED STATES V. ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA ( ALCOA ) 674 INDUSTRIAL
INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT CORP. V. MITSUI & CO. 676
NOTES ON ALCOA AND MITSUI 677
C. PROTESTS AGAINST THE EXTRATERRITORIAL APPLICATION OF THE U.S.
ANTITRUST LAWS 6 80
D. MODERATING THE EXTRATERRITORIAL APPLICATION OF THE U.S. ANTITRUST
LAWS: TIMBERLANE AND THIRD RESTATEMENT §403 683
IMAGE 11
CONTENTS XXVII
RESTATEMENT (SECOND) FOREIGN RELATIONS LAW §40 (1965) 683
TIMBERLANE LUMBER CO. V. BANK OF AMERICA NT. & SA 683
RESTATEMENT (THIRD) FOREIGN RELATIONS LAW OF THE UNITED STATES §§402 &
403 (1987) 685
NOTES ON SECOND RESTATEMENT, TIMBERLANE, AND THIRD RESTATEMENT 685 E.
CONTEMPORARY SUPREME COURT APPROACH TO EXTRATERRITORIAL APPLICATION OF
U.S. ANTITRUST LAWS: HARTFORD FIRE AND HOFFMANN- LAROCHE 691
HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE CO. V. CALIFORNIA 692
F. HOFFMANN-LAROCHE, LTD. V. EMPAGRAN, SA 697
NOTES ON HARTFORD FIRE AND HOFFMANN-LAROCHE 701
4. THE EXTRATERRITORIAL APPLICATION OF FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS 709
MORRISON V. NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LTD. 711
NOTES ON MORRISON 717
B. CHOICE OF LAW APPLICABLE TO TORTS 723
1. TRADITIONAL APPROACH: TERRITORIALITY AND VESTED RIGHTS 724
A. THE TERRITORIAL RULE: PLACE OF THE WRONG 724
B. SELECTED MATERIALS ON THE TRADITIONAL PLACE OF WRONG RULE 725
/ STORY, COMMENTARIES ON THE CONFLICT OF LAWS §§18, 20, 23, 29, 32, 33,
35 & 38 (2D ED. 1841) 725
RESTATEMENT (FIRST) CONFLICT OF LAWS §§1, 6, 377 & 378 (1934) 725
ALABAMA GREAT SOUTHERN RAILROAD CO. V. CARROLL 725
NOTES ON STORY S COMMENTARIES, FIRST RESTATEMENT, AND CARROLL 727 C.
CHARACTERIZATION, ESCAPE DEVICES, AND PROCEDURAL LAWS 731
VICTOR V. SPERRY 732
RESTATEMENT (FIRST) CONFLICT OF LAWS §§384, 585, 610, 611 & 612 (1934)
734 NOTES ON VICTOR AND FIRST RESTATEMENT 734
2. CONTEMPORARY APPROACHES TO CHOICE OF LAW APPLICABLE TO TORTS 738 A.
CRITICISM OF VESTED RIGHTS DOCTRINE 738
B. CONTEMPORARY APPROACHES: INTEREST ANALYSIS 739
C. CONTEMPORARY APPROACHES: SECOND RESTATEMENT S MOST SIGNIFICANT
RELATIONSHIP STANDARD 740
D. CONTEMPORARY LOWER COURT APPROACHES TO CHOICE OF LAW APPLICABLE TO
TORT 741
B. CURRIE, NOTES ON METHODS AND OBJECTIVES IN THE CONFLICT OF LAWS 742
RESTATEMENT (SECOND) CONFLICT OF LAWS §§6, 10, 122, 145, 146 IF 156
(1971) 744
TRAMONTANA V. SA EMPRESA DE VIACDO AEREA RIO GRANDENSE 744
NOTES ON CURRIE, SECOND RESTATEMENT (SECOND), AND TRAMONTANA 749 C.
CHOICE OF LAW APPLICABLE TO CONTRACTS 758
1. PARTY AUTONOMY AND CHOICE-OF-LAW CLAUSES 758
A. TRADITIONAL U.S. APPROACH: CHOICE-OF-LAW CLAUSES NOT ENFORCEABLE 759
B. CONTEMPORARY APPROACH: CHOICE-OF-LAW CLAUSES ARE PRESUMPTIVELY
ENFORCEABLE 759
C. PUBLIC POLICY 760
D. REASONABLE RELATIONSHIP 761
E. INTERPRETATION OF CHOICE-OF-LAW CLAUSES 762
F. SELECTED MATERIALS ON PARTY AUTONOMY 763
RESTATEMENT (SECOND) CONFLICT OF LAWS §§187 & 204 (1971) 763
THE BREMEN V. ZAPATA OFF-SHORE COMPANY 763
IMAGE 12
XXVIII CONTENTS
RICHARDS V. LLOYD S OF LONDON 763
N.Y. GENERAL OBLIGATIONS LAW §5-1401 763
LEHMAN BROTHERS COMMERCIAL CORPORATION V. MINMETALS INTERNATIONAL
NON-FERROUS METALS TRADING CO. 763
NOTES ON SECOND RESTATEMENT, BREMEN, RICHARDS, AND MINMETALS 767 2.
TRADITIONAL APPROACH TO CHOICE OF LAW GOVERNING CONTRACTS IN THE ABSENCE
OF CHOICE-OF-LAW AGREEMENT: TERRITORIALITY AND VESTED RIGHTS 777
RESTATEMENT (FIRST) CONFLICT OF LAWS §§332 & 358 (1934) 777
MILLIKEN V. PRATT 777
LOUIS-DREYFUS V. PATERSON STEAMSHIPS, LTD. 780
NOTES ON FIRST RESTATEMENT, MILLIKEN, AND LOUIS-DREYFUS 781
3. CONTEMPORARY APPROACH TO CHOICE OF LAW GOVERNING CONTRACTS IN THE
ABSENCE OF CHOICE-OF-LAW AGREEMENT: MOST SIGNIFICANT RELATIONSHIP 784
RESTATEMENT (SECOND) CONFLICT OF LAWS §§188, 198, 202 & 206 (1971) 785
LILIENTHAL V. KAUFMAN 785
NOTES ON SECOND RESTATEMENT AND LILIENTHAL 788
D. ERIE AND THE CHOICE-OF-LAW RULES IN FEDERAL COURTS 791
DAY & ZIMMERRNANN, INC. V. CHALLONER 792
LIU V. REPUBLIC OF CHINA 793
NOTES ON DAY & ZIMMERRNANN AND LIU 793
ACT OF STATE AND FOREIGN SOVEREIGN COMPULSION 797
A. ACT OF STATE DOCTRINE: INTRODUCTION AND HISTORICAL BACKGROUND 797
B. CONTEMPORARY FORMULATIONS OF THE ACT OF STATE DOCTRINE 801
1. THE SABBATINO DECISION 801
BANCO NATIONAL DE CUBA V. SABBATINO 801
NOTES ON SABBATINO 808
2. ELEMENTS OF THE ACT OF STATE DOCTRINE 817
A. DEFINITION OF ACT OF STATE 817
ALFRED DUNHILL OF LONDON, INC. V. REPUBLIC OF CUBA 818
NOTES ON ALFRED DUNHILL 819
B. SITTING IN JUDGMENT ON AN ACT OF STATE: VALIDITY VS. MOTIVATIONS
823 W.S. KIRKPATRICK & CO. V. ENVIRONMENTAL TECTONICS CORP. 824
NOTES ON ENVIRONMENTAL TECTONICS 827
C. THE SITUS REQUIREMENT 832
BRAKA V. BANCOMER, S.N.C. 833
NOTES ON BANCOMER 834
C. EXCEPTIONS TO THE ACT OF STATE DOCTRINE 838
1. THE BERNSTEIN EXCEPTION 838
W.S. KIRKPATRICK DF CO. V. ENVIRONMENTAL TECTONICS CORP. 839
NOTES ON ENVIRONMENTAL TECTONICS 839
2. THE COMMERCIAL EXCEPTION 842
ALFRED DUNHILL OF LONDON, INC. V. REPUBLIC OF CUBA 843
NOTES ON DUNHILL G45
IMAGE 13
CONTENTS XXIX
3. THE TREATY EXCEPTION 847
KALAMAZOO SPICE EXTRACTION CO. V. PROVISIONAL MILITARY GOVERNMENT OF
SOCIALIST ETHIOPIA 848
KUWAIT AIRWAYS CORP. V. IRAQI AIRWAYS CO. 850
NOTES ON KALAMAZOO SPICE AND KUWAIT AIRWAYS 853
4. THE SECOND HICKENLOOPER AMENDMENT 856
D. FOREIGN SOVEREIGN COMPULSION DOCTRINE 857
INTERAMERICAN REFINING CORP. V. TEXACO MARACAIBO, INC. 857
RESTATEMENT (THIRD) FOREIGN RELATIONS LAW §441 (1987) 859
RESTATEMENT (SECOND) CONFLICT OF LAWS §202 (1971) 859
NOTES ON TEXACO MARACAIBO AND RESTATEMENTS 859
PART FOUR INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE
10
SERVICE OF U.S. PROCESS ON FOREIGN PERSONS 867
A. INTRODUCTION AND HISTORICAL BACKGROUND 867
1. CHOICE OF LAW 868
2. SERVICE OF PROCESS IN THE UNITED STATES: AN HISTORICAL OVERVIEW 868
B. CONTEMPORARY U.S. RULES GOVERNING SERVICE OF PROCESS ON FOREIGN
DEFENDANTS 871
1. SERVICE OF PROCESS IN FEDERAL COURT PROCEEDINGS 871
A. SERVICE OF COMPLAINT AND SUMMONS UNDER RULE 4 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF
CIVIL PROCEDURE 871
B. SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT AS AJURISDICTIONAL REQUIREMENT UNDER
THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 871
C. SERVICE OF COMPLAINT AND SUMMONS AS A MEANS OF NOTICE UNDER THE
FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 872
D. SERVICE AS COMMENCING AN ACTION AND TOLLING STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS
UNDER THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 872
2. MECHANISMS FOR SERVING FOREIGN DEFENDANTS WITH U.S. PROCESS WITHIN
THE UNITED STATES 873
3. NO SERVICE OF U.S. PROCESS ABROAD BY U.S. CONSULS 874
4. SERVICE OF U.S. PROCESS ABROAD UNDER OLD RULE 4(I) OF THE FEDERAL
RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 874
5. SERVICE OF U.S. PROCESS ABROAD ON FOREIGN DEFENDANTS UNDER RULE 4(F)
OF THE CURRENT FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 875
A. RULE 4(F)(L): SERVICE ABROAD PURSUANT TO HAGUE SERVICE CONVENTION AND
OTHER INTERNATIONALLY AGREED MEANS 875
B. RULE 4(F)(2): ALTERNATIVE MECHANISMS OF SERVICE ABROAD 877 C. RULE
4(F) (3): SERVICE AS DIRECTED BY DISTRICT COURT 877
6. WAIVERS OF SERVICE UNDER RULE 4(D) 878
7. SERVICE OF PROCESS ON FOREIGN DEFENDANTS IN STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS
879 8. DUE PROCESS CLAUSE: REASONABLE NOTICE REQUIREMENTS FOR SENDEE 880
C. SERVICE OF PROCESS IN FOREIGN LEGAL SYSTEMS 880
1. RULES GOVERNING SERVICE OF PROCESS IN FOREIGN COURTS 880
IMAGE 14
CONTENTS
2. RESTRICTIONS ON SERVICE OF FOREIGN PROCESS WITHIN NATIONAL TERRITORY
881 3. SELECTED MATERIALS ON FOREIGN SERVICE RESTRICTIONS AND LETTERS
ROGATORY 882 SWISS PENAL CODE ARTICLE 271 883
DIPLOMATIC NOTE OF JANUARY 10, 1980 FROM THE EMBASSY OF FRANCE TO THE
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE 8 83
DIPLOMATIC NOTE DATED SEPTEMBER 27, 1979 FROM THE EMBASSY OF THE FEDERAL
REPUBLIC OF GERMANY TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE 883
UNITED STATES CODE 28 U.S.C. §§1696 &1781 884
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, CIRCULAR ON PREPARATION OF LETTERS ROGATORY
884 NOTES ON ARTICLE 271, DIPLOMATIC NOTES, AND LETTERS ROGATORY 884 D.
A CLOSER LOOK AT SERVICE OF U.S. PROCESS ABROAD: SELECTED ISSUES 888 1.
SEN-ICE OF U.S. PROCESS ABROAD UNDER NEW RULE 4(F) AND OTHER
LEGISLATIVE GRANTS WHERE FOREIGN LAW RESTRICTS U.S. SERVICE 888 A.
CONGRESS MAY AUTHORIZE SERVICE ABROAD IN VIOLATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW
B. PRESUMPTION THAT CONGRESS DOES NOT INTEND TO AUTHORIZE SERVICE
ABROAD IN VIOLATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW C. RULE 4(F) S PROVISIONS FOR
SERVICE ABROAD IN VIOLATION OF FOREIGN LAW 889
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION V. NAHAS 889
FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, RULE 4(F) 893
RIO PROPERTIES, INC. V. RIO INTERNATIONAL INTERLINK 893
NOTES ON NAHAS, RULE 4(F), AND RIO 898
2. SERVICE OF PROCESS ABROAD PURSUANT TO THE HAGUE SERVICE CONVENTION
909 A. THE HAGUE SERVICE CONVENTION IS NOT A BASIS FOR PERSONAL
JURISDICTION 910
B. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF THE HAGUE SERVICE CONVENTION 910 3. OVERVIEW
OF THE HAGUE SERVICE CONVENTION 912
4. PURPOSES OF THE HAGUE SERVICE CONVENTION 913
5. SCOPE OF HAGUE SERVICE CONVENTION: CIVIL OR COMMERCIAL 914 6.
SERVICE OF PROCESS BY CENTRAL AUTHORITIES UNDER ARTICLE 5 OF THE HAGUE
SERVICE CONVENTION 915
A. SERVICE UNDER ARTICLE 5 (A) IN THE MANNER USED FOR SERVICE IN
DOMESTIC ACTIONS 915
B. SERVICE BY CENTRAL AUTHORITY PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 5(B) 916
C. SERVICE BY THE CENTRAL AUTHORITY PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 5 S SECOND
PARAGRAPH 917
7. EXCLUSIVITY OF THE HAGUE SERVICE CONVENTION 917
A. THE HAGUE SERVICE CONVENTION PREEMPTS SERVICE MECHANISMS UNDER LOCAL
LAW 918
B. THE HAGUE SERVICE CONVENTION PROVIDES SERVICE MECHANISMS
SUPPLEMENTING DOMESTIC LAW 918
KADOTA V. HOSOGAI 919
NOTES ON KADOTA 920
8. ALTERNATIVE MECHANISMS FOR SERVICE UNDER ARTICLES 8, 10, AND 19 OF
THE HAGUE SERVICE CONVENTION 924
A. DIRECT SERVICE BY CONSULAR AND DIPLOMATIC CHANNELS UNDER ARTICLE 8
925
B. INDIRECT SERVICE BY CONSULAR AND DIPLOMATIC CHANNELS UNDER ARTICLE 9
925
IMAGE 15
CONTENTS XXXI
C. ALTERNATIVE SERVICE MECHANISMS UNDER ARTICLE 10 925
I. ARTICLE 10(A): SENDING JUDICIAL DOCUMENTS BY MAIL 925
II. ARTICLES 10(B) AND 10(C): SERVICE BY COMPETENT PERSONS 926 D.
ARTICLE 19 S SAVINGS PROVISION 926
E. SELECTED MATERIALS CONCERNING ALTERNATIVE SERVICE MECHANISMS UNDER
THE HAGUE SERVICE CONVENTION 927
HONDA MOTOR CO. V. SUPERIOR COURT 927
STATEMENT BY JAPANESE DELEGATION TO HAGUE CONFERENCE ON PRIVATE
INTERNATIONAL LAW 929
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, LEGAL ADVISOR S OPINION 930
VASQUEZ V. SUND EMBA AB 930
NOTES ON HONDA, U.S. AND JAPANESE STATEMENTS, AND VASQUEZ 933 9. SCOPE
OF THE HAGUE SERVICE CONVENTION: WHEN IS SERVICE ABROAD REQUIRED AND
WHEN CAN SERVICE BE EFFECTED WITHIN THE UNITED STATES ON FOREIGN
DEFENDANTS? 939
VOLKSWAGENWERK AG V. SCHLUNK 940
NOTES ON VOLKSWAGENWERK V. SCHLUNK 946
10. DEFAULT JUDGMENTS UNDER ARTICLE 15 OF THE HAGUE SERVICE CONVENTION
952 E. SERVICE OF PROCESS ABROAD PURSUANT TO THE INTER-AMERICAN
CONVENTION ON LETTERS ROGATORY 952
F. SERVICE OF U.S. PROCESS ON FOREIGN STATES 953
1. FSIA S REGIME FOR SERVICE ON FOREIGN STATES 953
2. ALTERNATIVE MECHANISMS FOR SERVICE PRESCRIBED FOR FOREIGN STATES
PROPER AND FOR FOREIGN STATE AGENCIES AND INSTRUMENTALITIES 954 3.
SELECTED MATERIALS ON SERVICE UNDER THE FOREIGN SOVEREIGN IMMUNITIES ACT
955
FOREIGN SOVEREIGN IMMUNITIES ACT 955
MAGNESS V. RUSSIAN FEDERATION 955
NOTES ON FSIA AND MAGNESS 958
G. SERVICE OF FOREIGN PROCESS IN THE UNITED STATES 961
1. NO DIRECT U.S. LEGAL RESTRICTIONS ON SERVICE OF FOREIGN PROCESS IN
THE UNITED STATES 961
2. ABSENCE OF DIRECT U.S. LEGAL RESTRICTIONS ON FOREIGN SERVICE OF
PROCESS MECHANISMS DOES NOT IMPLY THAT U.S. COURTS WILL RECOGNIZE
RESULTING FOREIGN JUDGMENTS 962
3. U.S. JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE IN SERVING FOREIGN PROCESS IN THE UNITED
STATES 962 A. SECTION 1696 962
B. SECTION 1781 963
4. ENSURING THAT FOREIGN PROCESS IS SERVED IN A MANNER THAT WILL PERMIT
U.S. RECOGNITION OF A FOREIGN JUDGMENT 964
11
EXTRATERRITORIAL DISCOVERY AND TAKING EVIDENCE ABROAD 965
A. OVERVIEW OF U.S. DISCOVERT OF MATERIALS LOCATED ABROAD 965
B. FOREIGN REACTIONS TO UNILATERAL EXTRATERRITORIAL U.S. DISCOVERY 969
1. FOREIGN DISCOVERY SYSTEMS 969
2. FOREIGN DIPLOMATIC OBJECTIONS TO U.S. DISCOVERY 971
3. FOREIGN BLOCKING STATUTES 972
IMAGE 16
XXXII CONTENTS
4. SELECTED MATERIALS ON FOREIGN DIPLOMATIC NOTES AND BLOCKING STATUTES
973 DIPLOMATIC NOTE FROM THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR EXTERNAL AFFAIRS OF
CANADA TO THE AMBASSADOR OF THE UNITED STATES 974
FRENCH PENAL CODE LAW NO. 80-538 975
SWISS PENAL CODE ARTICLE 273 975
PHILIPPINE PRESIDENTIAL DECREE NO. 1718 975
NOTES ON OBJECTIONS TO U.S. DISCOVERY AND BLOCKING STATUTES 975
C. DIRECT U.S. DISCOVERY OF MATERIALS LOCATED ABROAD: JUDICIAL POWER 978
1. DIRECT EXTRATERRITORIAL DISCOVERY OF DOCUMENTS FROM PARTIES TO U.S.
LITIGATION 978
2. DIRECT EXTRATERRITORIAL DISCOVERY FROM PARTIES BY DEPOSITION UPON
ORAL EXAMINATION 978
A. STANDARDS FOR ORDERING DEPOSITION OF FOREIGN PERSONS 979
B. AN INTRODUCTION TO THE MECHANICS OF CONDUCTING FOREIGN DEPOSITIONS
981
3. SELECTED MATERIALS ON DIRECT EXTRATERRITORIAL DISCOVERY FROM PARTIES
982 IN RE URANIUM ANTITRUST LITIGATION 982
DUBAI ISLAMIC BANK V. CITIBANK, NA 983
NOTES ON URANIUM ANTITRUST AND DUBAI ISLAMIC BANK 987
4. DIRECT EXTRATERRITORIAL DISCOVERY FROM NONPARTY WITNESSES 993
FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, RULE 45 993
28 U.S.C. §§1783 & 1784 993
LAKER AIRWAYS LIMITED V. PAN AMERICAN WORLD AIRWAYS 993
NOTES ON RULE 45, PAN AMERICAN WORLD AIRWAYS, AND §§1783 AND 1784 995 D.
DIRECT U.S. DISCOVERY OF MATERIALS LOCATED ABROAD: RESOLVING CONFLICTS
BETWEEN U.S. DISCOVERY ORDERS AND FOREIGN LAW 1000
1. EXTRATERRITORIAL DISCOVERY IN VIOLATION OF FOREIGN LAW: HISTORICAL
INTRODUCTION AND JUDICIAL POWER 1000
A. HISTORICAL INTRODUCTION 1000
B. SOCIE TE INTERNATIONALE V. ROGERS 1001
RESTATEMENT (FIRST) CONFLICT OF LAWS §94 (1934) 1003
RESTATEMENT (SECOND) FOREIGN RELATIONS LAW §§39 & 40 (1965) 1003 UNITED
STATES V. FIRST NATIONAL CITY BANK 1003
NOTES ON RESTATEMENTS AND CITY BANK 1006
2. EXTRATERRITORIAL DISCOVERY IN VIOLATION OF FOREIGN LAW: CONTEMPORARY
APPROACHES 1012
FOREIGN RELATIONS LAW OF THE UNITED STATES RESTATEMENT (THIRD) §442
(1987) 1012 REINSURANCE CO. OF AMERICA, INC. V. ADMINISTRATIA
ASIGURARILOR DE STAT 1012 IN RE AIR CARGO SHIPPING SERVICES ANTITRUST
LITIGATION 1017
NOTES ON RESTATEMENT §442, REINSURANCE COMPANY, AND AIR CARGO 1019 E.
DISCOVERS- PURSUANT TO CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE 1024
F. DISCOVER)- ABROAD UNDER THE HAGUE EVIDENCE CONVENTION 1026
1. OVERVIEW OF THE HAGUE EVIDENCE CONVENTION 1026
A. SCOPE OF THE CONVENTION 1027
B. CENTRAL AUTHORITY MECHANISM 1028
C. ARTICLE 23 S EXCEPTION FOR PRETRIAL DOCUMENT REQUESTS 1029
D. X LTERNATIVE METHODS OF TAKING EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO THE HAGUE
EVIDENCE CONVENTION 1030
E. EXECUTION OF LETTERS OF REQUEST 1032
2. EXCLUSIVITY OF THE HAGUE EVIDENCE CONVENTION: AEROSPATIALE 1032
IMAGE 17
CONTENTS XXXIII
SOCIE TE NATIONALE INDUSTRIELLE AEROSPATIALE V. U.S. DISTRICT COURT 1033
NOTES ON AEROSPATIALE 1040
3. EXCLUSIVITY OF THE HAGUE EVIDENCE CONVENTION: YOU-AEROSPATIALE
EXPERIENCE 1044
ARTICLE 23 RESERVATIONS OF FRANCE, GERMANY, AND SWEDEN 1044
BENTON GRAPHICS V. UDDEHOLM CORP. 1044
IN RE VITAMINS ANTITRUST LITIGATION 1047
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, CIRCULAR ON PREPARATION OF LETTERS ROGATORY
1051 NOTES ON ARTICLE 23 RESERVATIONS, UDDEHOLM, IN RE VITAMINS, AND
DEPARTMENT OF STATE CIRCULAR 1051
G. TAKING OF EVIDENCE IN THE UNITED STATES IN AID OF FOREIGN PROCEEDINGS
1059 1. TAKING OF EVIDENCE IN THE UNITED STATES WITHOUT COURT ASSISTANCE
1059 2. TAKING OF EVIDENCE IN THE UNITED STATE WITH COURT ASSISTANCE
1059
INTEL CORPORATION V. ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 1060
NOTES ON INTEL 1066
12
RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS 1077
A. INTRODUCTION 1077
1. RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT DISTINGUISHED 1078
2. RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF SISTER STATE JUDGMENTS UNDER THE U.S.
FULL FAITH AND CREDIT CLAUSE 1078
B. RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS BY U.S. COURTS 1079
1. NO EXPRESS FEDERAL LAW GOVERNING RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF
FOREIGN JUDGMENTS 1079
2. CONTEMPORARY APPROACHES TO RECOGNITION OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS IN THE
UNITED STATES 1081
A. HILTON V. GUYOT: INTERNATIONAL COMITY AND THE PRESUMPTIVE RECOGNITION
OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS 1081
B. STATUTORY MECHANISMS FOR THE RECOGNITION OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS:
UNIFORM FOREIGN MONEY JUDGMENTS RECOGNITION ACT AND UNIFORM
FOREIGN-COUNTRY MONEY JUDGMENTS RECOGNITION ACT 1082
3. FOREIGN APPROACHES TO THE RECOGNITION OF U.S. AND OTHER JUDGMENTS
1084 4. ABORTIVE HAGUE JURISDICTION AND JUDGMENTS CONVENTION AND ALFS
PROPOSED JUDGMENTS LEGISLATION 1085
5. SELECTED MATERIALS ON THE PRESUMPTIVE RECOGNITION OF FOREIGN
JUDGMENTS 1086
HILTON V. GUYOT 1086
RESTATEMENT (SECOND) CONFLICT OF LAWS §§92 & 98 (1971) 1090
UNIFORM FOREIGN MONEY JUDGMENTS RECOGNITION ACT 1090
EUROPEAN UNION COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) NO. 44/2001 OF 22 DECEMBER 2000
ON JURISDICTION AND THE RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OFFUDGMENTS IN CIVIL
AND COMMERCIAL MATTERS 1090
AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE PROPOSED FOREIGN JUDGMENTS LEGISLATION 1090 NOTES
ON HILTON, SECOND RESTATEMENT, AND LEGISLATIVE MATERIALS 1090 6. THE
RECIPROCITY REQUIREMENT 1094
HILTON V. GUYOT 1095
IMAGE 18
XXXIV CONTENTS
SOMPORTEX, LTD. V. PHILADELPHIA CHEWING GUM CORP. 1095
READING & BATES CONSTR. CO. V. BAKER ENERGY RESOURCES CORP. 1096 NOTES
ON HILTON, SOMPORTEX, AND BAKER ENERGY 1098
7. THE REVENUE RULE 1 1 02
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH
COLUMBIA V. GILBERTSON 1103
NOTES ON HER MAJESTY 1104
8. APPLICABLE LAW AND THE ERIE DOCTRINE 1110
SOMPORTEX, LTD. V. PHILADELPHIA CHEWING GUM CORP. 1110
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA V.
GILBERTSON 1110
NOTES ON SOMPORTEX AND HER MAJESTY 1110
C. EXCEPTIONS TO THE PRESUMPTIVE RECOGNITION OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS IN
U.S. COURTS 1114
1. ADEQUATE NOTICE AND PROPER SERVICE 1115
ACKENNANN V. LEVINE 1115
NOTES ON ACKERMANN 1117
2. PERSONAL AND SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OF RENDERING COURT 1120
MERCANDINO V. DEVOE & RAYNOLDS, INC. 1121
S.C. CHIMEXIM SA V. VETO ENTERPRISES LTD. 1122
NOTES ON MERCANDINO AND S.C. CHIMEXIM 1123
3. PUBLIC POLICY 1133
ACKERMANN V. LEVINE 1134
TELNIKOFFV. MATUSEVITCH 1136
SOUTHWEST LIVESTOCK & TRUCKING CO., INC. V. RAMON 1138
NOTES ON ACKERMANN, TELNIKQFF, AND SOUTHWEST LIVESTOCK 1140
4. FAIRNESS OF FOREIGN JUDICIAL SYSTEM 1146
SOCIETY OF LLOYD S V. ASHENDEN 1146
BRIDGEWAY CORP. V. CITIBANK 1148
NOTES ON ASHENDEN AND BRIDGETVAY 1150
13
INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION AND U.S. COURTS: AN OVERVIEW 1157
A. OVERVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION 1157
1. INTRODUCTION 1157
2. OVERVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR ARBITRATION 1160
A. THE NEW YORK CONVENTION 1161
B. NATIONAL LEGISLATION CONCERNING INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION
1161
C. U.S. LEGISLATION CONCERNING INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION 1162
B. ENFORCEABILIU OF INTERNATIONAL AIBITRATION AGREEMENTS UNDER THE NEW
YORK CONVENTION AND THE FAA 1163
1. INTRODUCTION TO ENFORCEABILITY OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION
AGREEMENTS 1164 A. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND 1164
B. OVERVIEW OF ENFORCEABILITY OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS
UNDER THE FAA 1165
C. SEPARABILITV OF THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT 1167
IMAGE 19
CONTENTS XXXV
D. ENFORCEABILITY OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS IN U.S. COURTS
UNDER THE NEW YORK CONVENTION 1167
E. WHO DECIDES CHALLENGES TO ARBITRAL JURISDICTION:
COMPETENCE-COMPETENCE AND FIRST OPTIONS V. KAPLAN 1168 2. SELECTED
MATERIALS ON ENFORCEMENT OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS IN U.S.
COURTS 1170
FEDERAL ARBITRATION ACT, 9 U.S.C. §§1-16, 201-210, §§301-307 1170
UNCITRAL MODEL LAW 1170
RHONE MEDITERRANEE COMPAGNIA FRANCESE DI ASSICURAZIONI E RIASSICURAZIONI
V. ACHILLE LAURO 1170
REPUBLIC OF NICARAGUA V. STANDARD FRUIT CO. 1172
NOKIA MAILLEFER SA V. MAZZER 1176
NOTES ON STATUTORY MATERIALS, RHONE, STANDARD FRUIT, AND NOKIA 1177 3.
THE NON-ARBITRABILITY DOCTRINE IN U.S. COURTS 1185
A. INTRODUCTION 1185
B. SELECTED MATERIALS ON THE NON-ARBITRABILITY DOCTRINE 1186
MITSUBISHI MOTORS CORP. V. SOLER CHRYSLER-PLYMOUTH, INC. 1186
RICHARDS V. LLOYD S OF LONDON 1191
NOTES ON MITSUBISHI AND RICHARDS 1191
4. INTERPRETATION OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS
1194 APOLLO COMPUTER, INC. V. BERG 1195
MITSUBISHI MOTORS CORP. V. SOLER CHRYSLER-PLYMOUTH, INC. 1197
NOTES ON APOLLO AND MITSUBISHI 1199
C. RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARDS 1201 1.
ENFORCEABILITY OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARDS UNDER THE NEW YORK
CONVENTION 1202
2. SELECTED MATERIALS ON THE ENFORCEABILITY OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL
AWARDS 1203
FEDERAL ARBITRATION ACT, 9 U.S.C. §§1-16, 201-210, §§301-307 1204
UNCITRAL MODEL LAW 1204
PARSONS SF WHITTEMORE OVERSEAS CO. V. SOCIETE GENERATE DE I INDUSTRIE
DU PAPIER 1204
NORTHROP CORP. V. TRIAD INTERNATIONAL MARKETING SA 1207
NOTES ON STATUTORY MATERIALS, PARSONS & WHITTEMORE, AND TRIAD 1208 D.
PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION 1215
MICH. COMP. LAWS §600.916 (1961) 1217
WILLIAMSON V. JOHN D. QUINN CONSTRUCTION CO. 1217
LAWLER, MATUSKY & SKELLER V. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF BARBADOS 1218 BIDERMANN
INDUS. LICENCING, INC. V. AVMAR NV 1219
SWISS PENAL CODE, ARTICLES 271 AND 307 1219
FRENCH PENAL CODE LAW NO. 80-538 1220
ABA MODEL RULES ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT, RULES 5.5(C) & 8.5(B) AND
COMMENTS 1220
NOTES ON WILLIAMSON, LAWLER, BIDERMANN, AND LEGISLATIVE MATERIALS 1220
INDEX 1229
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Born, Gary 1955- Rutledge, Peter B. 1970- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)133641066 (DE-588)1025281861 |
| author_facet | Born, Gary 1955- Rutledge, Peter B. 1970- |
| author_role | aut aut |
| author_sort | Born, Gary 1955- |
| author_variant | g b gb p b r pb pbr |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV039621481 |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | KF418 |
| callnumber-raw | KF418.C48 |
| callnumber-search | KF418.C48 |
| callnumber-sort | KF 3418 C48 |
| callnumber-subject | KF - United States |
| classification_rvk | PT 515 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)760121200 (DE-599)BVBBV039621481 |
| dewey-full | 347.73/5 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 347 - Procedure and courts |
| dewey-raw | 347.73/5 |
| dewey-search | 347.73/5 |
| dewey-sort | 3347.73 15 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| edition | 5. ed. |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01751nam a2200457zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV039621481</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20130321 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">111007s2011 xxu |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2011029530</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780735507555</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-7355-0755-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)760121200</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV039621481</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxu</subfield><subfield code="c">US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KF418.C48</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">347.73/5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PT 515</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139908:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Born, Gary</subfield><subfield code="d">1955-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)133641066</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">International civil litigation in United States courts</subfield><subfield code="c">Gary B. Born, Peter B. Rutledge</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5. ed.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">New York, NY</subfield><subfield code="b">Wolters Kluwer Law & Business</subfield><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XXXV, 1243 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Conflict of laws</subfield><subfield code="x">Civil procedure</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="v">Cases</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Conflict of laws</subfield><subfield code="x">Jurisdiction</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="v">Cases</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Civil procedure</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="v">Cases</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Zivilprozessrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4117728-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Zivilprozessrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4117728-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rutledge, Peter B.</subfield><subfield code="d">1970-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1025281861</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">SWB Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024471873&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-024471873</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | USA USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd |
| geographic_facet | USA |
| id | DE-604.BV039621481 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T00:07:37Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780735507555 |
| language | English |
| lccn | 2011029530 |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-024471873 |
| oclc_num | 760121200 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-M382 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-739 |
| owner_facet | DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-M382 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-739 |
| physical | XXXV, 1243 S. |
| publishDate | 2011 |
| publishDateSearch | 2011 |
| publishDateSort | 2011 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Law & Business |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Born, Gary 1955- Verfasser (DE-588)133641066 aut International civil litigation in United States courts Gary B. Born, Peter B. Rutledge 5. ed. New York, NY Wolters Kluwer Law & Business 2011 XXXV, 1243 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Conflict of laws Civil procedure United States Cases Conflict of laws Jurisdiction United States Cases Civil procedure United States Cases Zivilprozessrecht (DE-588)4117728-9 gnd rswk-swf USA USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd rswk-swf USA (DE-588)4078704-7 g Zivilprozessrecht (DE-588)4117728-9 s DE-604 Rutledge, Peter B. 1970- Verfasser (DE-588)1025281861 aut SWB Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024471873&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Born, Gary 1955- Rutledge, Peter B. 1970- International civil litigation in United States courts Conflict of laws Civil procedure United States Cases Conflict of laws Jurisdiction United States Cases Civil procedure United States Cases Zivilprozessrecht (DE-588)4117728-9 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4117728-9 (DE-588)4078704-7 |
| title | International civil litigation in United States courts |
| title_auth | International civil litigation in United States courts |
| title_exact_search | International civil litigation in United States courts |
| title_full | International civil litigation in United States courts Gary B. Born, Peter B. Rutledge |
| title_fullStr | International civil litigation in United States courts Gary B. Born, Peter B. Rutledge |
| title_full_unstemmed | International civil litigation in United States courts Gary B. Born, Peter B. Rutledge |
| title_short | International civil litigation in United States courts |
| title_sort | international civil litigation in united states courts |
| topic | Conflict of laws Civil procedure United States Cases Conflict of laws Jurisdiction United States Cases Civil procedure United States Cases Zivilprozessrecht (DE-588)4117728-9 gnd |
| topic_facet | Conflict of laws Civil procedure United States Cases Conflict of laws Jurisdiction United States Cases Civil procedure United States Cases Zivilprozessrecht USA |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024471873&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT borngary internationalcivillitigationinunitedstatescourts AT rutledgepeterb internationalcivillitigationinunitedstatescourts |