Kostorizna sprava u starodavnʹomu Kyjevi:
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | Ukrainian |
Veröffentlicht: |
Kyïv
KNT
2011
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Abstract |
Beschreibung: | In kyrill. Schr., ukrain. - Zsfassung in engl. und russ. Sprache u.d.T.: Bonecarving in ancient Kyiv ... |
Beschreibung: | 251 S. zahlr. Ill. |
ISBN: | 9789663736709 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV039598297 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20150326 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 110923s2011 a||| |||| 00||| ukr d | ||
020 | |a 9789663736709 |9 978-966-373-670-9 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)756356470 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV039598297 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
041 | 0 | |a ukr | |
049 | |a DE-12 | ||
084 | |a 7,41 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Serhjejeva, Maryna Serhiïvna |d ca. 20./21. Jh. |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1028891873 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Kostorizna sprava u starodavnʹomu Kyjevi |c M. S. Serhjejeva |
264 | 1 | |a Kyïv |b KNT |c 2011 | |
300 | |a 251 S. |b zahlr. Ill. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a In kyrill. Schr., ukrain. - Zsfassung in engl. und russ. Sprache u.d.T.: Bonecarving in ancient Kyiv ... | ||
648 | 7 | |a Geschichte 900-1250 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Beinschnitzerei |0 (DE-588)4164294-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
651 | 7 | |a Kiew |0 (DE-588)4030522-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Kiew |0 (DE-588)4030522-3 |D g |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Beinschnitzerei |0 (DE-588)4164294-6 |D s |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Geschichte 900-1250 |A z |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 2 |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024449238&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 2 |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024449238&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Abstract |
940 | 1 | |n oe | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-024449238 | ||
942 | 1 | 1 | |c 900 |e 22/bsb |f 0902 |g 477 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804148436573880320 |
---|---|
adam_text | список
СКОРОЧЕНЬ
АВУ
—
Археологічні відкриття в Україні
АДУ
—
Археологічні дослідження в Ук¬
раїні
АЛЮР
—
Археологическая летопись Южной
России
ΑΠ
—
Археологічні пам ятки УРСР
АСГЭ
—
Археологический сборник Госу¬
дарственного Эрмитажа
ГИМ
—
Государственный исторический
музей
ИИМК РАН
—
Институт истории материальной
культуры Российской АН
КС
—
Киевская старина
КСИА
—
Краткие сообщения Института ар¬
хеологии
КСИИМК
—
Краткие сообщения Института ис¬
тории материальной культуры
МАИЭТ
—
Материалы по археологии, истории
и этнографии Таврии
МДАПВ
—
Матеріали і дослідження з архео¬
логії Прикарпаття і Волині
MIK
—
Музей історії Києва
МИА
—
Материалы и исследования по ар¬
хеологии СССР
—
Науковий архів НАН України
—
Наукові записки Інституту ма¬
теріальної культури, Київ
—
Національний заповідник «Херсо¬
нес Таврійський»
—
Національний музей історії Украї¬
ни
—
Российская археология
—
Советская археология
—
Свод археологических источни¬
ков
—
Этнографическое обозрение
—
Ювелирное искусство и материаль¬
ная культура
—
Acta Archaeologica, Budapest
—
Archeologia
Polski
—
Archeologické rozhledy
—
Materiály Zachodnio-Pomorskie
—
Slovenská Archeolygia
250
ЗМІСТ
Передмова
...............................................................
З
Розділ
1
Історія вивчення київського косторізного ремесло—
5
Розділ
2
Організація косторізної справи у Києві
...................,. 13
2.1
Залишки косторізного виробництва на території
Києва. Косторізні майстерні
....................................
ІЗ
2.2.
Співіснування косторізної справи з іншими
видами ремесла
......................................................... 29
2.3.
Діяльність приїжджих майстрів у Києві та
імпортні речі
.............................................................. 31
2.4.
Етапи розвитку київського косторізного ремесла
39
Розділ З
Кісткова сировина та її обробка
.............................. 43
3.1.
Види сировини та шляхи її отримання
........... 42
3.2.
Обробка кістки
................................................. 52
3.3.
Обробка рогу
.................................................... 58
3.4.
інструменти для обробки кістки та рогу
......... 62
3.5.
Обробка дерева та кістки: спільне та відмін¬
ності
........................................................................ 68
Розділ
4
Готові вироби з кістки та рогу
................................... 71
4.
1
.
Знаряддя праці та їх деталі
............................... 72
4.2.
Речі повсякденного вжитку
............................. 85
4.3.
Зброя і спорядження вершника та коня
.......... 107
4.4.
Деталі оздоблення речей
.................................. 115
4.5.
Предмети, пов язані з ритуально-магічною
сферою
.........................................-.......................... 118
4.6.
Інші речі
...........................................................
12Û
Розділ
5
Художня різьблена кістка
......................................... 125
5.1.
Орнамент та техніка Його виконання
.............. 125
5.2.
Зооморфний декор
........................................... 141
5.3.
Графіті на виробах з кістки та рогу
.................. 146
5.4.
Загальне та специфічне в декоративному офор¬
мленні київських виробів з кістки та рогу
............. 149
Розділ
6
Місце київського ремесла у системі косторізної спра¬
ви Південної Русі та його подальша доля
................. 153
Резюме............
......................................................... 159
Summary
.......;........................................................... 166
Таблиці
..................................................................... 172
Література.;
............................................................. 237
Список скорочень
.................................................... 250
251
Summary
іУ^Щс^г^
M.
Sergeeva
BONECARVING
IN ANCIENT KYIV
This study is devoted to bonecarving in Ancient
Kiev of X—
XIII
centuries.
Ancient Kyiv is one of the largest centers of pro¬
fessional bonecarving development. Kiev materials
comprise many hundreds of finished articles of differ¬
ent categories: household items, tools, parts of weap¬
ons, adornments, things of ritual and magical sphere.
Processing of bone and antler is also represented by
findings of raw materials, semi-manufactured goods
and waste products. However, despite of many years
of study of the city, bonecarving still has not become
the object of a monographic study.
Numerous traces of the processing of bone
and antler were recorded in almost all principal ar¬
eas of Kyiv. Separate fragments of bone and antler
with traces of processing were found on most Kyiv
messuages of Old Russian time. If such findings are
isolated, scattered and not associated with the bon¬
ecarving complexes, they can not be considered as
a sign of bonecarving workshop at the messuage,
and we can talk about domestic production in case
of need. At many messuages a small number
(10
or
more) of processed bones and fragments of antler are
concentrated, including blanks and isolated finished
items. Such complexes can be attributed to sporadic
short-term manufacture of auxiliary character.
In some Kyiv complexes almost all the basic
features of professional craft are recorded, such as a
large quantity of raw material, blanks, articles at dif¬
ferent stages of working, spoilage. As a rule, special
tools for bonecarving are absent, because of their
poor preservation in Kyiv soil. Bonecarving work¬
shops were found at Mount Starokyivska, Mount
Kyselivka and Podil.
166
---------------------------------------------------------------__________________
SUMMARY
In Kyiv, as in other medieval cities, coexistence of different industries on one
messuage is observed. In some cases, traces of bonecarving were recorded on mes¬
suages where jewelry or glassmaking were the main professional activity. One of the
causes for the unification of various crafts in the messuage should be considered the
small quantity of bonecarving production that could not give the principal means of
subsistence. Citizens could also combine crafts and agriculture, but the development
of professional craft in
XII —
the first half of
XIII
century allows to assume that at that
time agriculture was a subsidiary occupation for a Kyiv craftsman. To the factors con¬
tributing to development of the Kyiv bonecarving in the fust phase (tenth century),
besides the internal socio-economic development, should be included the influence
from the regions where bonecarving, for various reasons, began to develop earlier.
First of all, at this stage mattered the craft of the north of Europe. An important role
could play visiting masters, who spread both creative ideas and processing technology
for bone and antler. Among the products connecting with another cultural traditions
(imported, produced by the itinerant artisans, or import samples), can be considered
early one-sided composite combs, horizontal needlecase of northern type with runic
signs from Obolonska
1
str.,
pointed objects with zoomorphic completion. Large-
scale production of combs in Kyiv for the present is not found. In general, the traces
of its own production recorded in Kyiv only from the eleventh century.
In connection with problem in question the complex studied in Spasska,
35
str.
(20O7
—
2008-s) is of special interest. The traces of developed bonecarving were not
recorded here, but the remains of walrus sculls and products of warms tusk (gaming
Pieces) were found. It should be noted local processing of imported raw material.
The complexes studied in Kyiv, allow to distinguish several stages of development
of bonecarving. In general, the process of development of bonecarving crafts in Kyiv is
the same as in other medieval cities in Europe. Its beginning coincided with the time,
when Kyiv became a major political, economic and cultural center, namely, the first half
of the tenth century, or possibly at the very end of ninth century. At this time domestic
Production (primitive tools) and upmarket products to order, produced by masters gen-
cralists took place. For bonecarving of tenth century the presence of high artistic things
Were characteristic, obviously made to order, mass market products were absent. Bone
aod antler carving was not yet a separate type of craft. In layers of the tenth century any
c°mplex with signs of professional bonecarving workshop was not recorded.
In Kyiv cultural layers of the eleventh century there are recorded only a few signs
^handling bone, clear bonecarving complexes are not represented. However, there
JŞ
no doubt that during this period formed the preconditions for the formation of
^necarving crafts as a separate variety of professional activity with the subsequent
Caseto
the mass market.
The twelfth— the first half of the thirteenth century was a period of prosperity
bonecarving as a commodity production. This phase is characterized not only by
^auction of
а
wide range of goods of mass demand, but also by presence of indus-
^al centers in different parts of the town. At the same time, some of the workshops
onstrate a tendency for fractional specialization when a certain type of product
*
In the workshops on Mount Starokyivska, Mount Kyselivka and the mes-
e
щ
Schekavitska,
29
str.
(Podii)
focused on the buttons. In Obolonska,
12
str.
Щ
made arrowheads.
167
SUMMARY
___________________________------------------------------------------
Social characteristics of craft must take account of its topography. Market-ori¬
ented professional craft of
posad (craft-and-trade
part of Old Russian town), is rep¬
resented by Podil bonecarving complexes. Due to lack of study of Old Russian social
topography of Kyselivka, it is much more difficult to characterize the social status of
the craft in this area is more difficult. Doubtless is just that here in the times of Old
Rus
operated one of the industrial areas of Kyiv. In the Upper Kyiv workshops were
associated primarily with representatives of the top estates of society. With the de¬
velopment of urban crafts in the
XII
century here also begins the
reorientation
of the
producers on the market, where work is performed not only on the individual order,
but also for the realization among the mass consumer.
The main raw material for bone carvers of Kyiv were both a bone and an antler.
The vast majority of the bones belongs to the cattle. The antler of elk, deer and roe
deer was utilized. About half of the defined antler raw material belongs to the antlers,
thrown in the autumn, the rest were obtained by hunting.
Lack of data concerning the Kyiv bonecarving of tenth century does not allow
affirm certainty about the preference of the masters of any kind of raw material. Elite
articles (cheek-pieces, ostrokonechniki, composite combs, gaming pieces, a spoon
from the burial number
110
and some other things) are made of antler, but not all of
them are uniquely related to local production. The production sector is represented
by the primitive tools made mostly of bone. In the XI—
XII
centuries bone completely
dominates. Production of antler of this period is represented by different categories,
but the major centers of antler carving were not recorded, and the articles usually
comprise a relatively small number of items.
The possibility of horn using in Kyiv bonecarving remains under the question.
Products of horn had not been found, but the horn cores with traces of processing
have been recorded in many messuages, both in bonecarving complexes and outside
them. The
présense
of horn scraps in complexes connected with different handicrafts
suggests its technical use (producing of animal glue, etc.). Separate scarps of antler
that sometimes could be found outside bonecarving complexes may also be technical
raw materials.
In the Kyiv production first, second and fourth circuit of the four technological
schemes of processing raw materials, selected by A.P. Borodovsky were used (full use
of the natural form of raw materials in the design of products, partial use of natural
forms, the use of raw materials fragments for production of things, and the use of sys¬
tems of cutting and splitting the raw material). Splinters of bone is almost not used.
Exceptions were separate, scanty tools.
The natural shape of the bone was used in some tools (piercing tools, tools of
nos)
in gaming pieces (astragalus, rattles, skates), in amulets. Processing of raw ma¬
terials in this case reduced to little correction of its form or drilling holes.
Asecondtechnologicalschemealsohasthenaturalformofrawmaterialsasbasic,
hnlľ^ T6 1
Cha^tS: rem0Val of one orboth epiphyses, sawing bones, drilling the
holes etc. For manufacture of various products used primarily diaphysis tubes.
,
<r wf
Stľ?
f
Pr0ÎCtS
Was manufactured according to the fourth technologi-
ÍlZ íf
ь
fromfbJanks on the basis of plates, obtained from compact sub-
ZSSSS~*~
■ 68
SUMMARY
Other principles underlie the cutting ribs and flat bones. At one of the ribs there
were possible to observe technique of making small disc-shaped articles using com¬
passes. Compact plate, obtained from flat bones after removal of the spongy layer are
of sufficient size for the manufacture of mounts.
The processing of antler was based on the same schemes. A number of items
based on its natural form (cheekpieces, tools for weaving). Cutting antler intended
obtaining bar blanks and antler plates.
The remaining tools and their traces on the raw materials, intermediate goods
and finished products suggests that the composition of tools of Kyiv bonecarvers did
not differ from that of the territory of the whole
Rus
and in medieval Europe. They
were axes, saws, knives, as well as files, chisels, scrapers, drills, compasses, an awl,
a lathe. In general, a set of tools for working with bone and antler consisted mainly
of the universal ones (knife, ax, saw) or going back to them genetically, but modified
and adapted specifically for bonecarving. The first ones used for the initial processing
of raw materials, the second ones for the manufacture of products and their orna¬
mentation.
Turning products recorded in Kyiv from the tenth century. According to me¬
dieval and ethnographic analogies we could suggest use of several types of lathes for
processing different types of raw materials. While admitting the possibility of using
any version of the lathe in bonecarving industry, we should take into account the
small size of bone and antler articles, and ease of their handling when the product is
not formed on the machine completely, but only corrected a ready-made form. Large
stationary lathe used primarily for the processing of relatively large wood articles,
such as wooden ware. Such machine-tool was less suitable for working with the bone.
Therefore, there is reasonably to believe that in bonecarving actually used the most
simple lathes with bow-shaped hand-operated drive, which had small size.
Talking about the similarities and differences in the treatment of bone material
on the one hand, and wood, on the other hand, should be borne in mind that similar
techniques can be observed at the stage of initial processing of raw materials. At later
stages this is true only in the case of manufacturing the same products of wood and
bone, where the sequence of operations dictated by the construction of things and
not by the raw material from which they were produced. Combs of antler and wood
could be an example.
The centuries-old tradition of wood processing, no doubt contnbuted to the de-
^topment of bonecarving crafts, but Kyiv, and generally Old Russian, bonecarvers,
Us*g the basic methods of processing the material, developed their specific techno
-
°f to work with raw bone, taking into account its features. Masters knew all aspects
°f the processing of bone and antler, beginning with the
sélection
of one or another
?f «s kind and finishing technology of manufacture of various products. A sufficiently
hgh level of development of bonecarving as a separate activity is been recorded
.
The range of articles of bone and antler is represented in a special
Capter
This
^iudes tools and their parts, household objects, parts of weapons and equipmentof
«*
and horse, the details of decoration (mounts, balusters °^^^£
■«¡«cd
ith ritual and magic sphere. Some auxiliary
^™**^đUte
H°» (knives handles, needlecases) also may be attributed
« «^^SthÄ
Ъ
Produc*
of personal use, such as combs and earcleaners, details of clothing and
169
SUMMARY
_________________________.---------_--------------------------------------
adornment, recreational items, as well as the remains of tanks of antler are classifi-
cated as things of everyday
Ufe.
A separate group is composed of various small objects
and objects of uncertain purpose.
The technology for manufacturing such articles as semi-spherical buttons and
arrowheads observed entirely on materials of several bonecarving workshops.
In general, characterizing the Kyiv bonecarving production, it should be noted
the broad scope of use of bone and antler. Correlation of items manufactured aco-
ording to different technological schemes of processing raw materials is different for
different groups of things. Among the tools the bulk are simple tools, made by the
first or, less frequently, the second technological scheme. In this group a number of
things, for which more sophisticated technology has been used, is insignificant. It is
indicative that such products are mainly rudimentary tools for household work or for
certain industries (weaving, sewing, leather processing, etc.), where simple imple¬
ments, made by the owner, complies with fairly primitive conditions of production.
Minimal processing of raw material was characteristic for religious items of per¬
sonal use (amulets and protectors of the teeth and of some other bones). The ex¬
ception is the antler egg, for which the specific raw material (elk antler) and special
processing, including sanding the surface, were used.
The largest share of production manufactured by the most complicated technology
accounts for personal items (combs, ear-cleaners, clothing, adornments), and recre¬
ational items for adults (chess, gaming pieces). This group has many categories of ar¬
ticles, for manufacturing of which the most variety of specialized tools (particularly for
the manufacture of combs), including in some cases lathe (buttons, chess and gaming
pieces), are used. Production of such items require a large number of sequential opera¬
tions. Exception in this group are items of children s leisure activities, which are among
the most primitive articles (the first scheme for processing of raw materials).
The articles manufactured by the fourth scheme that is from specially prepared
blanks (with the exception of cheekpieces) dominated among the objects of weaponry
and equipment of rider and horse. Fortheir manufacture mainly simple cutting tools
and drill were used. Uthe in this group was used only for finishing shape of conical
arrowheads.
Thus, the majority of articles of complicated processing, refers to the elements
of urban culture and everyday life, which appear only with the development of urban
handicrafts Techniques of processing of bone and antler, traditional for the previ-
Z£Tt
-PTtlVe
t00lSj tOys items
reIatinê
to beHefs), virtually unchanged and is
limited to simple transactions available to all comers
ogy of
itľe^cutio^1 ÍS
deVOted t0 omamentation of bone and horn and technol-
0^
°f Creating °ftexture on the decorative surface contour, tri-
ТГШЅ
three
tensional
carving is usually distinguished.
Ж^ЙЕТ
RľSS
Γ
tradÍtÍOn·
Nation of
decorale
effect also
con*
the first half of
ХШ
century based largely on abstract motifs, executed in
______________________________________________________
SUMMARY
contour technique. This ornament is not only completely dominated on mass items,
but also decorates many elite thing. Relief and three-dimensional carving mainly
used for individual ornamentation, often for elitist things. Several categories of prod¬
ucts (buttons, combs, earcleaners) have standard ornament. Among them, the semi-
spherical buttons are ornamented most carefully. For their ornamentation coloring
and inlay could be applied. In other cases, standardization is not traceable. Stylized
floral motifs are present only on individual things.
Zoomorphic decor was made in the contour,
reliefând
volumetric techniques.
In contrast to the geometric ornament, he usually has an individual character. The
exception are the common variety of earcleaners with faceted body and zoo- or or-
nitomorphic completion. Their ornamentation is standard. Some Kyiv zoomorphic
¡mages have exact analogies, coming from other areas. In this case, a hand of one
master or general prototype are rightfully to be assumed.
Some of items of the bones and horns have graffiti, which have different origins
and differ in meaning. The graffiti on the surface of armaments could serve
tamgas.
Ornament-graffiti can be seen as an attempt by the owner to decorate their own thing.
Some graffiti had a magical meaning. Marks of the owner or magical signs could be
graffiti on the astragali.
A traditional ornament and borrowed plots are both were used. Regional speci¬
ficity in the decorative design of products of ancient bonecarver is observed in the ra¬
tio of different types of decorative motives and their preference for certain options.
Comparing with other South Russian towns, where so far not recorded
complex¬
es,
which can be linked with a specialized craft, Kyiv bonecarving is distinguished by
4est quantity of production and high professional standard. Its market character at
Uè
end of XI
_
the first half of
XIII
century allows to consider Kyiv not only as local
bonecarving center but also as that of regional significance.
A Production of bone carver deprived of local features, which makes difficult to
^ermine the center of its manufacturing. The semi-spherical buttons can be
¡
con-
«f* as happy exception. Connection of almost all professional wmW^JS
ln «rent districts of Kyiv with the production of buttons and their considerable
^ount allow to considered Kyiv as the center of their production.
,
Tbebonecarvingworkshopscontinuedtooperatempostmongouanandla^
***
Kyiv, The available data indicate that significant chf
— ■ *«***»*
echn°fogy of bone in postmongolian time did not take place.
««Ищет
and production quantity is observed. The level
с
folian
and late medieval Kyiv never reached that of
ХП
-
the first
century.
|
any_adam_object | 1 |
author | Serhjejeva, Maryna Serhiïvna ca. 20./21. Jh |
author_GND | (DE-588)1028891873 |
author_facet | Serhjejeva, Maryna Serhiïvna ca. 20./21. Jh |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Serhjejeva, Maryna Serhiïvna ca. 20./21. Jh |
author_variant | m s s ms mss |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV039598297 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)756356470 (DE-599)BVBBV039598297 |
era | Geschichte 900-1250 gnd |
era_facet | Geschichte 900-1250 |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01792nam a2200409 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV039598297</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20150326 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">110923s2011 a||| |||| 00||| ukr d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789663736709</subfield><subfield code="9">978-966-373-670-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)756356470</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV039598297</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ukr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">7,41</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Serhjejeva, Maryna Serhiïvna</subfield><subfield code="d">ca. 20./21. Jh.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1028891873</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Kostorizna sprava u starodavnʹomu Kyjevi</subfield><subfield code="c">M. S. Serhjejeva</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Kyïv</subfield><subfield code="b">KNT</subfield><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">251 S.</subfield><subfield code="b">zahlr. Ill.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In kyrill. Schr., ukrain. - Zsfassung in engl. und russ. Sprache u.d.T.: Bonecarving in ancient Kyiv ...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 900-1250</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Beinschnitzerei</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4164294-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kiew</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4030522-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Kiew</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4030522-3</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Beinschnitzerei</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4164294-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 900-1250</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 2</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024449238&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 2</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024449238&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-024449238</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">900</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0902</subfield><subfield code="g">477</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | Kiew (DE-588)4030522-3 gnd |
geographic_facet | Kiew |
id | DE-604.BV039598297 |
illustrated | Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T00:07:06Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9789663736709 |
language | Ukrainian |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-024449238 |
oclc_num | 756356470 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 |
owner_facet | DE-12 |
physical | 251 S. zahlr. Ill. |
publishDate | 2011 |
publishDateSearch | 2011 |
publishDateSort | 2011 |
publisher | KNT |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Serhjejeva, Maryna Serhiïvna ca. 20./21. Jh. Verfasser (DE-588)1028891873 aut Kostorizna sprava u starodavnʹomu Kyjevi M. S. Serhjejeva Kyïv KNT 2011 251 S. zahlr. Ill. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier In kyrill. Schr., ukrain. - Zsfassung in engl. und russ. Sprache u.d.T.: Bonecarving in ancient Kyiv ... Geschichte 900-1250 gnd rswk-swf Beinschnitzerei (DE-588)4164294-6 gnd rswk-swf Kiew (DE-588)4030522-3 gnd rswk-swf Kiew (DE-588)4030522-3 g Beinschnitzerei (DE-588)4164294-6 s Geschichte 900-1250 z DE-604 Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 2 application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024449238&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 2 application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024449238&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Abstract |
spellingShingle | Serhjejeva, Maryna Serhiïvna ca. 20./21. Jh Kostorizna sprava u starodavnʹomu Kyjevi Beinschnitzerei (DE-588)4164294-6 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4164294-6 (DE-588)4030522-3 |
title | Kostorizna sprava u starodavnʹomu Kyjevi |
title_auth | Kostorizna sprava u starodavnʹomu Kyjevi |
title_exact_search | Kostorizna sprava u starodavnʹomu Kyjevi |
title_full | Kostorizna sprava u starodavnʹomu Kyjevi M. S. Serhjejeva |
title_fullStr | Kostorizna sprava u starodavnʹomu Kyjevi M. S. Serhjejeva |
title_full_unstemmed | Kostorizna sprava u starodavnʹomu Kyjevi M. S. Serhjejeva |
title_short | Kostorizna sprava u starodavnʹomu Kyjevi |
title_sort | kostorizna sprava u starodavnʹomu kyjevi |
topic | Beinschnitzerei (DE-588)4164294-6 gnd |
topic_facet | Beinschnitzerei Kiew |
url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024449238&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024449238&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
work_keys_str_mv | AT serhjejevamarynaserhiivna kostoriznaspravaustarodavnʹomukyjevi |