Državno zakonodavstvo o Pravoslavnoj crkvi u Srbiji: od 1804. do 1914. godine
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Beograd
Pravoslavni Bogoslovski Fak. Univ., Inst. za Teološka Istraživanja
2010
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Abstract |
| Beschreibung: | In kyrill. Schr., serb. - Zsfassung in engl. und russ. Sprache u.d.T.: State legislation on the Orthodox church in Serbia ... |
| Beschreibung: | 251 S. |
| ISBN: | 9788674050781 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV039593065 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20130116 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 110921s2010 |||| 00||| srp d | ||
| 020 | |a 9788674050781 |9 978-86-7405-078-1 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)756347995 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV039593065 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a srp | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-Re13 | ||
| 084 | |a 7,41 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Novaković, Dragan |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Državno zakonodavstvo o Pravoslavnoj crkvi u Srbiji |b od 1804. do 1914. godine |c Dragan Novaković |
| 264 | 1 | |a Beograd |b Pravoslavni Bogoslovski Fak. Univ., Inst. za Teološka Istraživanja |c 2010 | |
| 300 | |a 251 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a In kyrill. Schr., serb. - Zsfassung in engl. und russ. Sprache u.d.T.: State legislation on the Orthodox church in Serbia ... | ||
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Serbisch-orthodoxe Kirche |0 (DE-588)80861-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 648 | 7 | |a Geschichte 1804-1914 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Gesetzgebung |0 (DE-588)4020682-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Serbien |0 (DE-588)4054598-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Serbien |0 (DE-588)4054598-2 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Gesetzgebung |0 (DE-588)4020682-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Serbisch-orthodoxe Kirche |0 (DE-588)80861-1 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Geschichte 1804-1914 |A z |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 2 |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024444127&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 2 |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024444127&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Abstract |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-024444127 | ||
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 200.9 |e 22/bsb |f 09034 |g 4971 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 909 |e 22/bsb |f 09034 |g 4971 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804148429202391040 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | Summary
Dragan
Novaković
State
Legislation on the Orthodox Church in Serbia
1804-1914
The independence of Serbia presented its intellectual elite with numerous
challenges and implied setting new standards for science, which has di¬
rected its potential, for decades, towards the study and affirmation of the
complete Yugoslav heritage and priorities in the function of stabilizing and
eliminating every attempt at endangering the institutional domination of
ideological power. This created an unacceptable disregard of certain fields
of science and a need for the organization of systematic research in order
to cope with such lapses, to fill historical gaps and eliminate an ideological¬
ly-imposed marginalization of certain important themes. Previously deter¬
mined and fomented scientific priorities were not sufficiently encompassed
in the entire complex of questions regarding the cultural accomplishments,
artistic values, legal succession, spirituality, linguistic characteristics, an-
thropo-geographic particularities and ethnological heritage of the Serbian
people in all of the territories it populates.
The scientific discontinuity that occurred during the existence of So¬
cialist Yugoslavia has manifested itself in the complex segment of the le¬
gal status of religious freedoms and in the relation between the state and
churches or religious communities. In consideration of the fact that this pe¬
riod saw the discontinuation of the development and the historical neglect
of the field of state-church law, systematically developed during the whole
XIX
century and significantly improved by constitutional and legislative
acts adopted by the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes (Yugoslavia),
this book was written in order to familiarize readers with the legal arrange¬
ments by which Serbia regulated statutory and other issues of importance
to the normal functioning of the Orthodox Church between
1804
and
1914.
The 19th century represents an important period in the Serbian Ortho¬
dox Church s long history, as its autonomy was secured in
1831,
and the
to¬
mos
of complete church independence in the Principality of Serbia was ob¬
tained from the Ecumenical Patriarchate in
1879.
The Sultan s issuing of the
Hatti-Sheriff in
1830
also settled Serbia s statehood, with it receiving auton¬
omy and the right to independently regulate different domains of internal
life. After several attempts and the coordination of Church and State bod¬
ies, the first law was adopted in
1836,
the
„Načertanije
(Draft) of Spiritu¬
al Authorities , which initialized the development of state legislative on the
Church, but also the important question whether the issue was of a state law
220
Summary
adopted procedurally by the Parliament or of a cannon act whose text was
suggested to the state bodies by the Council of Hierarchs and the Metro¬
politan. The inherited past bad experiences, the weak Church organization,
a Bishopric and clergy unworthy of the historical conditions and an unac¬
ceptable discipline of the priests contributed to the law, in almost its entire¬
ty, being dedicated to Church judiciary.
Regardless of different positions, the
Načertanije
is most certainly an
act of historical importance, because in it Serbia got a written law on the
Church adopted by regular procedure for the first time. The influence of
the Sovereign on all Church affairs remained considerable, but many provi¬
sions of the Law restricted the afore-mentioned self-will and forced him to
respect the act that he signed. The allocation of significant powers to priests
and monks in Church affairs had a direct link with fresh memories of the
practice and work of Bishops of the Ecumenical Patriarchate whose will the
clergy was mostly at. Having emerged from the shadow of the strong and
uncompromising Prince and overcoming the generally uneducated and ex¬
tremely conservative priesthood and monkhood, the Law became the ad¬
justing landmark and a sort of guiding sign for the needed changes in be¬
haviour, the modification of the pattern for life and for the priestly service.
With the changing of the ruling dynasty, the newly established pow¬
ers took decisive measures to break off with Ottoman heritage, nullify the
negative effects of the previous rule as well as to reform and direct the stat¬
ic and conservative Serbian society towards Europe, in which it saw an ide¬
al to be strived for. In line with the new policy of a fundamental revolution
of Serbian society, it was logical to expect that the Serbian Church receive
its freedom of organization in its affairs, but also the responsibility for all
consequences which stem from such a method of rule. The supreme church
authorities prepared a new draft law, but the abstention of the state bodies
toward the proposition was alluding to several changes being needed that
would enable a greater influence of the state on church affairs. Unprepared
for a confrontation with the Church, the new prince formed a representa¬
tive council tasked with going over the text in order to offer suggestions.
The complexity of the whole issue made the job more difficult, but did not
represent a hurdle for the ruler and the
Sovjet
(Council) to adopt, in August
of
1847,
the „Organization of Spiritual Authorities in the Serbian Principal¬
ity
(„Ustrojenije duhovnih vlasti Knjaževstva srpskog ),
characterized by
an almost exact accord with Orthodox canon law.
According to the Ustrojenije, the Eparchy Consistories, as primary
spiritual courts, would independently elect members with the established
obligation to receive formal confirmation from the Council of Hierarchs
Summary
221
as well as to inform the Ministry of Education. Members were on a regu¬
lar pay-roll for their work and were freed of an older obligation of confir¬
mation from the Prince and an oath. Priests were excluded from responsi¬
bility before the civil authorities, save for litigations in private disputes, in¬
heritance and the possession of property. The Appeal Consistory was free
to elect members and adopts decisions independent of any other authority.
The Council of Hieararchs, consisting of bishops, decided on the most im¬
portant issues in Church life and elected new bishops, with the obligation
to submit the candidate name to the Prince for appointment. By the fore-
mentioned provisions, the Consistories received significant independence
in adopting decisions, which directly meant the elimination of the earlier
established regulatory role and the reduction of the interference of the State
to a minimum. The gist of the law demonstrates the fact that it was a histor¬
ic act which secured the autonomy of the Orthodox Church and gave the
possibility to the competent Church bodies to begin the complex procedure
of harmonizing Church life with the canonical hierarchy.
The return to power of the old dynasty meant the nullification of the
largest number of adopted laws which were judged to represent a hurdle in
the establishment of rule according to previously-applied patterns. All po¬
litical opponents were expelled and even the highest Church head had to
seek refuge in Austria. Not even the Serbian Church was outside of the om¬
nipotent system of control of the new dynasty, especially keeping in mind
that the canonical and at the time liberal law from
1847
was adopted with
influence from the expelled Metropolitan. The law stemming from politi¬
cal philosophy and the predecessors legal practice was to be abolished im¬
mediately, carrying out the institutional control and subjecting the com¬
plete organization of the Orthodox Church to the will of the ruling dynas¬
ty and the new political forces that supported it. Preoccupied with the idea
of the need for rallying Slavic nations, maintaining the concept of necessi¬
ty of the Church s greater participation in national and state affairs and de¬
manding the elimination of state meddling in primary church affairs, the
new metropolitan quickly reached misunderstandings with the dynasty un¬
ready to share in competences. Aware that time was not his ally and that he
must work efficiently, the Metropolitan prepared and submitted a new pro¬
posal „Law on Church authorities of the Orthodox faith , which was adopt¬
ed in
1862
following necessary harmonization.
The new law represented a dramatic backtrack considering the reached
emancipation of the Church from state control mechanisms. The provi¬
sions from which it derived that Hierarchs were not the chairmen of Epar¬
chy Consistories, which most often judged priests on different wrongs, were
222
Summary
most difficult to accept for the Church. The Hierarchs were obliged to reg¬
ularly submit reports on annual activities of the Eparchy Consistory to the
Minister of Education and Church Affairs. The installed provisions calling
for the Princes confirmation of the Appeals Consistory chairman and mem¬
bers ensured the subordination of that Church authority to the Minister as
well. The Bishops made up the Council of Hierarchs, but several articles of
the law enabled different influences of the state on the functioning and de¬
cisions of the Church s highest body. Establishing such a system, the ruling
clique assured some sort of power sharing with Church bodies with the clear
possibility of, depending on the circumstances, realizing domination.
The shift in foreign policy orientation and the binding to Austria, led to
the Metropolitan s replacement, the dethroning of all disobedient bishops
and the adoption, in
1882,
of new Church legislative. The Law on Changes
and Amendments to the Law on Church Authorities from
1862
contained
numerous innovations whose basic goal was the complete Church subor¬
dination to the State and the marginalization of binding church laws. The
Council of Hierarchs was made up, in addition to bishops, by archiman¬
drites and one proto-presbyter from each eparchy, appointed every five
years by order of the king. The Minister of Education and Church Affairs
had to be informed of the start and ending of the Councils convening, and
the enforcement of certain decisions was only possible following his signa¬
ture. The new make-up of the Council of Hierarchs elected bishops, whose
selection became valid following the king s approval. The comprehensive
changes included the election procedure for the new head, chosen by a spe¬
cial electoral body which included a considerable number of top state of¬
ficials. Bishops were equated in status with civil servants, and the assign¬
ment of the highest church titles implied the previous consent of the min¬
ister. The innovations, especially the established state control and the wide
discretionary powers of the minister, government and king, were in com¬
plete opposition to the canons by which the Orthodox Church functioned
for centuries. Using the instruments at its disposal, the state demonstrated
its might and announced that it would use it in all situations of its domina¬
tion being contested or its authority being brought into question.
The changes of rulers and political forces which established an irreg¬
ular situation in the Church enabled the return of the deposed Metropol¬
itan and legal Hierarchs along with the beginning of the complex proc¬
ess of legislative modification. The adoption of the law was mired in differ¬
ent difficulties, as it was quickly demonstrated that not even the new polit¬
ical groups did not demonstrated readiness to give up the control over the
Church. Government and the Metropolitan formed separate commissions,
Summary
223
which promoted previously determined positions, such that each adopt¬
ed solution implied difficult and painstaking harmonization. Thanks to the
reached compromise, the new Law on Church Authorities was adopted at
the end of April
1890,
which was in force, with smaller modifications, until
the beginning of the First World War.
The involvement of two commissions created solutions which precise¬
ly regulated the most important church issues. It precisely listed the com¬
petencies of the Council of Hierarchs, the Serbian Metropolitan, Bishops
and lower bodies as church authorities and the Council of Hierarchs, the
Supreme Spiritual Court and Eparchy Spiritual Courts as judicial-church
authorities. Considerable attention was given to clerical guilt and punish¬
ment, as well as the procedure of church authorities during trial. The com¬
prehensiveness and systematism of the legal text did not mean the remov¬
al of flaws which the Metropolitan most often pointed to during the draft¬
ing. The State managed to maintain the established control mechanisms,
which was especially manifested through the composition of the elector¬
al body which was yet again dominated by laymen. The provisions which
prevented the competent Hierarch from presiding over the Eparchy Court
were reproduced from the old law. By establishing the right of the King to
name, by order, regular and honorary members of church courts, as well as
their equating, in rights, with civil court judges, and the equation of judi¬
cial clerks and registrars with civil servants, enabled another level of con¬
trol and obedience for those responsible in settling issues of guilt for cler¬
ics. The Metropolitans regular protests and pointing to the unsustainabili-
ty of such a situation, forced the authorities to modify the law and allow the
hierarchs, as representatives of the Church, the right to elect the chairman
and members of the eparchy courts.
The important issue of the material position of bishoprics and priest¬
hood in Serbia, from the First Serbian Uprising until the beginning of the
First World War and the state legislative which regulated it, was analyzed in
the context of social conditions in which the Serbian state was formed and
stabilized, during the 19th century. Aware that priests and monks represent¬
ed the intellectual elite and the bastion of freedom-thinking ideas, the First
Serbian Uprising leadership took measures to favourably resolve their ma¬
terial status, taking into account that the agreed tariffs be acceptable and do
not allow for an unnecessary and damaging conflict with the people already
burdened by considerable expenditures for the uprising. In order to replace
the Phanariot with a domestic hierarchy and prevent larger abuse and un¬
bearable taxation of the impoverished populace, the leader of the Second
Serbian Uprising, through different approaches, decreased and controlled
224
Summary
income with the end goal of transforming bishops into some sort of civil
servants with regular income from the state budget.
The remuneration of bishops from the state budget was continued lat¬
er on, with certain modifications to the sums depending on the deprecia¬
tion of or introduction of new currency. By frequent modifications, govern¬
ments hope to reach solutions which would allow for the obligations of the
populace to secure priests, and their families, decent conditions for life, but
also the obligations of priests to charge for ceremonies according to precise¬
ly regulated tariffs. During the conflict between the legal Hierarchy and the
Serbian Government, the „Law on the Regulation of Priestly Estates which
in conjunction with new state policy, regulated that important issue. It pre¬
cisely set the number of households in parishes and the obligation of priests
to hold ceremonies of greatest importance for believers without remunera¬
tion. It set nineteen different religious ceremonies for which priests had the
right to charge in money according to a precisely determined tariff.
Encouraged by the decision of the authorities to return the deposed
Metropolitan to the throne and convinced that the State was on the defen¬
sive, the priests decisively raised the issue of their income hoping for wide
support of the people and political elite needed to transform their demands
into legal norm in the People s Assembly
(Narodna Skupština).
Claiming
that the remedy to their material status was solely possible through regu¬
lar systematic salaries from the state budget along with the maintaining of
charges for religious ceremonies, created an opposition, particularly strong
in intellectual circles. Several initiatives were set in motion, there was in¬
tense lobbying and great effort was put into several legal drafts, but resist¬
ance, both hidden and open, to the proposed settlement of the material sta¬
tus of priests prevailed, so that the situation remained to the beginning of
the First World War, that is the charges for ceremonies according to the reg¬
ulated tariffs.
Assessing that the encompassing education and
alphabétisation
of the
populace cannot be separated from priests and monks, in times of peace,
the First Serbian Uprising leadership allowed for the establishment of sem¬
inaries, who s first graduates, through parish and other duties, gave a con¬
siderable contribution to the cultural-educational upbringing of the popu¬
lace and the positive reading into Orthodox dogma. The seminary ceased
to function with the crushing of the uprising, in order to continue its work
in
1836
under changed circumstances. The conditions for education were
harsh, but nationally awakened Serbia had enough interested candidates
aware that the completion of that first school meant the taking of decisive
steps, which would enable them to propel from the average state of
gener-
Summary
225
al
backwardness, by partaking in the stream of social events and securing
good positions among the new national elite being formed.
Using periods in which the dominant political forces did not demon¬
strate particular interest in the position of the seminary, church author¬
ities vested efforts in improving its cadre of professors and enriching the
curriculum and syllabus with new spiritual and temporal disciplines. The
changed circumstances and the articulated hope of the new political elite to
subject all national institutions implied the adoption of a separate law for
the seminary in
1863.
Through strict logic of the law, the seminary was prac¬
tically taken from the Church and allocated to the charge of to the Minis¬
ter of Education and Church Affairs. By deciding that the ruler name pro¬
fessors and substitutes, control was established and any possibility that in¬
dividuals opposed to the policies and interests of the dynasty was prevent¬
ed. According to the new law, which came into force in
1900,
the seminary
became a nine-year higher school, which demonstrated the ruling powers
great interest for the education of seminary youth giving it recognition in
its existing effort in education the people.
The leadership of the First Serbian Uprising took independent meas¬
ures or supported the elders and faithful in repairing old, and where the cir¬
cumstances allowed for it, building new churches and monasteries. In by
far more favourable conditions, convinced that the building was in function
of stabilizing the new state and respecting the tradition of endowment, later
Serbian rulers invested portions of their fortune in the building of church¬
es, purchase of bells, the painting of frescoes and the buying of ceremoni¬
al object for churches in Serbia and territories under Ottoman occupation.
The Draft on Spiritual Authorities, as well as other laws adopted up to
1914,
contain provisions on the building of religious objects or convey that duty
to certain church bodies. The issue in question was regulated in
1863
by a
separate law, which detailed the procedure for building and specified the
obligations of competent bodies from projection to the end of construction.
The analyzed documents on the constitutional status of the Serbian
Church and its relations with the state from
1804
up to the beginning of the
First World War, demonstrate a consistent application of the State Church
System, from which stemmed the states control function, even a consid¬
erable subjugation of the Church. The established status implied signifi¬
cant privileges, but also the right of the stronger side in that partnership to
put down the rules of engagement and the obligation of the junior partner
to accept and respect them. The aforementioned period was also marred
by the establishment of a legislative framework for the functioning of the
Church, by numerous examples of direct influence of the ruler on the
elee-
226
Summary
tion
of the highest hierarchy, the disproportionate efforts of state bodies to
meddle in several ways in internal Church affairs and basically modest and
unsuccessful resistance of the Church s highest functionaries to, in goal of
respecting the canonical order, restrict or eliminate the ever impatient au¬
thorities from putting the entire spiritual life under their fold. Influenc¬
ing church affairs, the dynasties, governments, parties in power and the ev¬
er-more powerful bourgeoisie took efforts to eliminate the Church, hold¬
ing the highest authority in the people, from the political sphere restrict¬
ing its possible influence on state affairs. The mentioned prevailing ten¬
dencies in the relation do not exclude the fact, confirmed by several exam¬
ples, that Serbian rulers and most governments followed developments in
the Church, financially helping its work in order to maximally enable it for
performing its functions of competence. The politicians, who through their
decisions, performed the renewal and transformation of the Serbian state
and society and in many elements fulfilled part of the centuries-old dream
of the Serbian people, loved and respected the Church, independent of dif¬
ferences that existed in several issues.
Садржај
Увод
............................................................. 9
I
Положај
и
деловање
Православне цркве током Првог српског устанка.
...
1
6
і.
Борба
српског
народа
за слободу
...................................
і8
2.
Улога свештенства
и монаштва
..................................... 22
З-
Положај
православне цркве
....................................... 23
II
Црквена
политика
кнеза Милоша
и борба
за
аутономију
Православне цр¬
кве у
Србији
........................................................ 33
і.
Организован^ црквеног
живота
................................... 34
2.
Добијање аутономије
православне цркве
и избор
првог митрополита
.
42
III
Начертаније
о духовним властима
из
1836.
године
—
први закон о Пра¬
вославно) цркви у
Србији
...........................................
5б
і.
Избор
митрополита Петра
......................................... 56
2.
Доношење Начертанија
о духовним властима
....................... 58
3- Одредбе
Начертанија
.............................................. 64
3-і.
Састав
Конзисторије
и начин
доношења одлука
..................
6ą
3.2.
Надлежност Конзисторије
..................................... 67
3-3-
Допуне
и
објашњења Начертанија
..............................
γο
ą.
Оснивање епархијских конзисторија
...............................
72
IV
Устројеније
духовних
власти
Књажества Сербскога
из
1847·
године
—
дру¬
ги
закон о
Православној
цркви у
Србији
............................. 74
ι.
Период владавине
уставобранитеља
................................
-¡в
2.
Доношење Устројенија
духовних
власти
............................ 78
3·
Одредбе
Устројенија
..............................................
8о
3-і.
Епархијске конзисторије
.......................................
8о
3.2.
Апелаторна конзисторија
...................................... 84
3-3-
Архијерејски сабор
............................................ 85
4.
Оцене каноничара
................................................ 86
V
Закон о црквеним властима
православне
вере из
ι862.
године
—
трећи
за¬
кон о
православној
цркви у
Србији
................................... 87
ι.
Оставка
митрополита Петра
....................................... 88
2.
Друга владавина кнеза Милоша и Михаила
......................... 93
3.
Избор
митрополита Михаила и
доношење
Закона о црквеним власти¬
ма
православне
вере
.............................................. 95
4-
Одредбе закона
...................................................
юо
4-і.
Епархијска конзисторија
.......................................
юо
4.2.
Апелаторијска конзисторија
.................................... 104
Садржај
4-3-
Архијерејски сабор
и
архијереји
................................
ю6
4·4·
Судски поступак
..............................................
ю8
4-5-
Врете
казни
...................................................
і її
5.
Оцене каноничара
................................................
іі2
VI
Закон
о изменама и допунама закона о
црквеним властима православне
вере
од
1882.
године
................................................
U4
і.
Уређење
односа
са
Васељенском патријаршијом
.....................
ιι8
2.
Смена митрополита Михаила
......................................
И9
3.
Доношење
Измена и допуна закона
.................................
і2і
4.
Смена легалне
јерархије
...........................................124
5.
Оцене каноничара
................................................125
VII
Закон о црквеним властима источно-православне цркве
усвојен
1890.
ГОДИНе
............................................................127
ι.
Повратак митрополита Михаила на трон и
доношење
Закона о црквеним
властима источно-православне цркве
..............................129
2.
Одредбе Закона
...................................................132
2.1.
Црквене власти
...............................................
іЗЗ
2.1.1.
Архијерејски
сабор
........................................
іЗЗ
2.1.2.
Митрополит
Србије
........................................134
2.1.3.
Епископ
..................................................135
2.1.4-
Окружни, београдски и
нишки протопресвитери
.............136
2.1-5.
Срески намесници
.........................................136
2.1.6.
Парохијски свештеници,
капелани
и
ђакони
.................137
2.1.7-
Црквена општина
.........................................138
2.1.8.
Манастирске старешине
—
настојатељи
.....................138
2.2.
Црквено-судске власти
........................................139
2.2.1.
Архијерејски
сабор
........................................139
2.2.2.
Велики
духовни
суд
........................................139
2.2.3-
Епархијски
духовни
суд
....................................140
2-3-
Изборни
сабор
................................................142
2-4-
Кривице свештених лица и казне
...............................144
2-5-
Поступање црквених
власти при
суђењу
........................145
2-5-1.
Свештеничких кривица
....................................145
2.5-2.
Свештеничких парница због
уживања црквеног имања
и паро-
хијског
прихода
...........................................147
2.5-3-
Брачних
спорова
грађана...................................
147
2.6.
Печати црквених власти
.......................................149
2.7-
Надзор државне власти
........................................149
3.
Оцене каноничара
................................................150
4.
Период до почетка Првог светског рата
.............................151
VIII
Законски прописи
којима
je
уређиван материјални положај
епископата
и
свештенства
Православне цркве у
Србији........................
154
Садржај
ι.
Положај
епископата...............................................
154
2.
Положа]
протојереја
и
ђакона
......................................
ібз
3.
Положај свештенства
.............................................165
IX
Оснивање богословије
и
успостављање правног оквира њеног
рада
.....
i8o
1.
Богословско
образовање
током
Првог српског устанка
...............
i8i
2.
Рад кнеза Милоша на
оснивању богословије
........................185
3.
Оснивање богословије
.............................................189
4-
Уређивање положаја
законом
......................................193
X
Изградња цркава
....................................................203
Закључак
.............................................................
2о6
Summary
.........................................................219
РєЗЮМЄ...........................................................
227
Литература
.......................................................236
Законодавни
извори
..............................................241
Регистар
имена
...................................................244
Извод из
рецензија
................................................248
Подаци
о аутору
..................................................252
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Novaković, Dragan |
| author_facet | Novaković, Dragan |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Novaković, Dragan |
| author_variant | d n dn |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV039593065 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)756347995 (DE-599)BVBBV039593065 |
| era | Geschichte 1804-1914 gnd |
| era_facet | Geschichte 1804-1914 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02049nam a2200445 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV039593065</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20130116 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">110921s2010 |||| 00||| srp d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9788674050781</subfield><subfield code="9">978-86-7405-078-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)756347995</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV039593065</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">srp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-Re13</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">7,41</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Novaković, Dragan</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Državno zakonodavstvo o Pravoslavnoj crkvi u Srbiji</subfield><subfield code="b">od 1804. do 1914. godine</subfield><subfield code="c">Dragan Novaković</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Beograd</subfield><subfield code="b">Pravoslavni Bogoslovski Fak. Univ., Inst. za Teološka Istraživanja</subfield><subfield code="c">2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">251 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In kyrill. Schr., serb. - Zsfassung in engl. und russ. Sprache u.d.T.: State legislation on the Orthodox church in Serbia ...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Serbisch-orthodoxe Kirche</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)80861-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1804-1914</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gesetzgebung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4020682-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Serbien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4054598-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Serbien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4054598-2</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Gesetzgebung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4020682-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Serbisch-orthodoxe Kirche</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)80861-1</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1804-1914</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 2</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024444127&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 2</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024444127&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-024444127</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">200.9</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09034</subfield><subfield code="g">4971</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">909</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09034</subfield><subfield code="g">4971</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Serbien (DE-588)4054598-2 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Serbien |
| id | DE-604.BV039593065 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T00:06:59Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9788674050781 |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-024444127 |
| oclc_num | 756347995 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-Re13 DE-BY-UBR |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-Re13 DE-BY-UBR |
| physical | 251 S. |
| publishDate | 2010 |
| publishDateSearch | 2010 |
| publishDateSort | 2010 |
| publisher | Pravoslavni Bogoslovski Fak. Univ., Inst. za Teološka Istraživanja |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Novaković, Dragan Verfasser aut Državno zakonodavstvo o Pravoslavnoj crkvi u Srbiji od 1804. do 1914. godine Dragan Novaković Beograd Pravoslavni Bogoslovski Fak. Univ., Inst. za Teološka Istraživanja 2010 251 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier In kyrill. Schr., serb. - Zsfassung in engl. und russ. Sprache u.d.T.: State legislation on the Orthodox church in Serbia ... Serbisch-orthodoxe Kirche (DE-588)80861-1 gnd rswk-swf Geschichte 1804-1914 gnd rswk-swf Gesetzgebung (DE-588)4020682-8 gnd rswk-swf Serbien (DE-588)4054598-2 gnd rswk-swf Serbien (DE-588)4054598-2 g Gesetzgebung (DE-588)4020682-8 s Serbisch-orthodoxe Kirche (DE-588)80861-1 b Geschichte 1804-1914 z DE-604 Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 2 application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024444127&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 2 application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024444127&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Abstract |
| spellingShingle | Novaković, Dragan Državno zakonodavstvo o Pravoslavnoj crkvi u Srbiji od 1804. do 1914. godine Serbisch-orthodoxe Kirche (DE-588)80861-1 gnd Gesetzgebung (DE-588)4020682-8 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)80861-1 (DE-588)4020682-8 (DE-588)4054598-2 |
| title | Državno zakonodavstvo o Pravoslavnoj crkvi u Srbiji od 1804. do 1914. godine |
| title_auth | Državno zakonodavstvo o Pravoslavnoj crkvi u Srbiji od 1804. do 1914. godine |
| title_exact_search | Državno zakonodavstvo o Pravoslavnoj crkvi u Srbiji od 1804. do 1914. godine |
| title_full | Državno zakonodavstvo o Pravoslavnoj crkvi u Srbiji od 1804. do 1914. godine Dragan Novaković |
| title_fullStr | Državno zakonodavstvo o Pravoslavnoj crkvi u Srbiji od 1804. do 1914. godine Dragan Novaković |
| title_full_unstemmed | Državno zakonodavstvo o Pravoslavnoj crkvi u Srbiji od 1804. do 1914. godine Dragan Novaković |
| title_short | Državno zakonodavstvo o Pravoslavnoj crkvi u Srbiji |
| title_sort | drzavno zakonodavstvo o pravoslavnoj crkvi u srbiji od 1804 do 1914 godine |
| title_sub | od 1804. do 1914. godine |
| topic | Serbisch-orthodoxe Kirche (DE-588)80861-1 gnd Gesetzgebung (DE-588)4020682-8 gnd |
| topic_facet | Serbisch-orthodoxe Kirche Gesetzgebung Serbien |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024444127&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=024444127&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT novakovicdragan drzavnozakonodavstvoopravoslavnojcrkviusrbijiod1804do1914godine |