Restituce majetku bývalých šlechtických rodů po roce 1989:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | Czech |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Praha
Národohospodářský Ústav Josefa Hlávky
2010
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Studie Národohospodářského ústavu Josefa Hlávky
2010,8 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Abstract |
| Beschreibung: | Zsfassung in engl. Sprache |
| Beschreibung: | 571 S. Ill. |
| ISBN: | 9788086729619 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV037487640 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20131018 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 110622s2010 a||| |||| 00||| cze d | ||
| 020 | |a 9788086729619 |9 978-80-86729-61-9 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)734087870 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV037487640 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a cze | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-M457 | ||
| 084 | |a 7,41 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Benda, Josef |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Restituce majetku bývalých šlechtických rodů po roce 1989 |c Josef Benda |
| 264 | 1 | |a Praha |b Národohospodářský Ústav Josefa Hlávky |c 2010 | |
| 300 | |a 571 S. |b Ill. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Studie Národohospodářského ústavu Josefa Hlávky |v 2010,8 | |
| 500 | |a Zsfassung in engl. Sprache | ||
| 648 | 7 | |a Geschichte 1989-2013 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 648 | 7 | |a Geschichte 1989-2010 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Adel |0 (DE-588)4000464-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rückerstattung |0 (DE-588)4178639-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Eigentum |0 (DE-588)4013793-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Böhmische Länder |0 (DE-588)4069573-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Tschechien |0 (DE-588)4303381-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Böhmische Länder |0 (DE-588)4069573-6 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Tschechien |0 (DE-588)4303381-7 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Adel |0 (DE-588)4000464-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Eigentum |0 (DE-588)4013793-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a Rückerstattung |0 (DE-588)4178639-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 5 | |a Geschichte 1989-2010 |A z |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 689 | 1 | 0 | |a Böhmische Länder |0 (DE-588)4069573-6 |D g |
| 689 | 1 | 1 | |a Tschechien |0 (DE-588)4303381-7 |D g |
| 689 | 1 | 2 | |a Adel |0 (DE-588)4000464-8 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | 3 | |a Eigentum |0 (DE-588)4013793-4 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | 4 | |a Rückerstattung |0 (DE-588)4178639-7 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | 5 | |a Geschichte 1989-2013 |A z |
| 689 | 1 | |8 1\p |5 DE-604 | |
| 830 | 0 | |a Studie Národohospodářského ústavu Josefa Hlávky |v 2010,8 |w (DE-604)BV036101616 |9 2010,8 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=022639056&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=022639056&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Abstract |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-022639056 | ||
| 883 | 1 | |8 1\p |a cgwrk |d 20201028 |q DE-101 |u https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk | |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |f 09049 |g 4371 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |f 090511 |g 4371 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804145801308405760 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | V. Summary
The objects of this thesis are restitutions of property of former noble families in the Czech
Republic after the year
1989.
It concerns very controversial theme; this statement is even
more valid if we speak about disputable restitutions of property· The issue is only rarely
viewed from complex and impartial angle; this fact is caused i.a. by great complicacy of the
factual and legal substance. Even the availability of historical documents is problematic, too.
The public is frequently not aware of or has even no idea on certain key facts of individual
cases, as a result of which usually only certain matters are perceived; this subjective
perception is strengthened by individuals, who are from various reasons interested in ending
the controversies concerning restitution of property of former noble families in favor of these
former owners; these individuals use during their activities different instruments, which are
described in detail in this thesis, in their efforts, the media are frequently their important
backers, who not from interest, but due to unfamiliarity or ignorance, stress in some cases
only the facts in favor of the former owners of property, which ends in deformed view of
public on some very disputable cases. This thesis is intending to accomplish complex view
and stress even the lesser-known facts.
Methodically, this thesis stems from both detailed legal analysis of major restitution legal
regulations enacted after the year
1989
and general reference to the remaining ones,
including their locking in period relationships, and detailed analysis of eight important
disputable cases of restitution of property of former noble families; where the greatest part of
this analysis is devoted to analysis of relevant court and administrative rulings. Last but not
least, as a part of the analysis of these cases, also their media picture in Czech periodical
press is pointed out; this is further critically evaluated.
In the introductory part, this thesis describes historical context, this from the creation of
independent Czechoslovak state and the ideas of first Czechoslovak president
Tomáš
Garrigue
Masaryk
as expressed in his book New Europe
-
Slavonic Position, where it is i.a.
stressed the idea that big land property should be divided into lots as it had been done in
Ireland; first land reform, further international treaties concluded after the end of second
world war (especially the Treaty No.
150/1947
Coll., on Reparations from Germany, creation
of Inter-allied Reparation Office and on Return of Monetary Gold (the so called „Paris
Reparation Agreement)), the decrees of the president of the republic and post-war
legislation, especially the Act No.
142/1947
Coll., on Revision of the First Land Reform. The
thesis also subsequently evaluates political and other prerequisites for enactment of
restitution laws enabling restitution of property in the period after the year
1989,
and briefly
compares the situation in Czechoslovakia, or in the Czech Republic respectively, with other
post-communist countries. The essay also briefly mentions the extent of restitutions in the
Czech Republic which under no circumstances related only to former noble families, stresses
the fact that many cases are not yet finalized and that the restitution of further property
(church) is currently subject of complicated political discussions and negotiations. The thesis
further adverts to the effect of restitutions on peace of persons concerning ownership and
other relations and the overall legal environment in the Czech Republic, as well as frequent
complicated phenomenon connected with restitutions.
In the part devoted to analysis or restitution and related legal regulations the thesis
focuses at first on general characteristics of all restitution legal regulations as well as on brief
mentioning of the second way, by which some of former owners of confiscated property or
their legal successors endeavor to regain it and that are the civil law actions on ownership
determination. The special legal regulations re mentioned: the Act No.
298/1990
Coll., on
Modification of Some Property Relations of Holy Orders and Congregations and
Olomouc
Archbishopric, as amended, Act No.
172/1991
Coll., on Conditions of Transfer of Some Items
from Czech Republic to the Ownership of Municipalities, as amended, Act No.
173/1990
Coll.,
by which the Act No.
68/1906
Сой.,
on Organization of Physical Training and by which Some
Legai
Relations Related to Voluntary Gym Organization is Repealed, as well as the Act No.
212/2000
Coll., on
Mitigation of Some Property Wrongdoing Incurred by Holocaust and on
Modification of the Act No.
243/1992
Coll., by which Some Legal Relations Connected to the
Act No.
č.
229/1991
Coll., on Modification of Ownership Relations to Soil and Other
Agricultural Property, as modified by the Act No.
93/1992
Coll., are Regulated, as amended.
Further, an analysis of basic principles or restitution legal regulations has been done.
Then, detailed interpretation of provisions of four general restitution laws that enable
making claims on confiscated property follows. It concerns Act No.
403/1990
Coll., on
Mitigation of Consequences of Some Property Wrongdoing; Act No.
87/1991
Coll., on Out-of-
Court Rehabilitations; Act No.
229/1991
Coll., on Modification of Ownership Relations to Soil
and Other Agricultural Property; and finally, Act No.
243/1992
Coll., by which some Legal
Relations Connected with Act No.
229/1991
Coll., are Regulated; this in division to original
wording of these restitution laws with general comments and to amended wording with
detailed comments, including also notes to their numerous modifications and frequent
reference to relevant court rulings.
The greatest part of this thesis is devoted to most-comprehensive mapping and legal
analysis of restitution of property of former noble families, the study of which may be very
beneficial from both the view of theory as well as from the view of professional experience;
this is i.a. because some restitution cases are not yet finalized. Practically, the disputable
restitutions of property are illustrated on eight (or by counting of both
braches
of cases
Des
Fours-Walderode and Colloredo-Mannsfeld on ten) big model cases. Four of these model
cases are related to restitution claims exercised mainly through restitution legal regulation;
this concerns concretely the cases
Des
Fours-Walderode (the former property of both
Dřínov
and
Smržovka-Hrubý Rohozec
branch of the family), Colloredo-Mannsfeld (the former
property of both
Opočno
and
Dobříš-Zbiroh
branch of the family), Salm-Reifferscheidt and
Trauttmansdorff-Weinsberg. Four more cases are dealing with restitution claims exercised
mainly through civil-law actions on ownership determination; this concerns concretely the
cases Kinsky, Harrach, Thun-Hohenstein a Schaumburg-Lippe, with the proviso that these
cases are analyzed in their complexity, which means that should the former noble families
assert claims on confiscated property through restitution legal regulations (the cases Harrach
and Schaumburg-Lippe), this is mentioned in the thesis. Each of the eight cases is divided
into five parts: history of confiscation, the property claimed, the persons asserting property
claims, the restitution case and its media picture. These restitution cases may be appraised
as very important and, from the legal and factual point of view, extremely complicated; also
by these reasons, the extent of this thesis reached
-
even by using condensed line-space
-
over
500
pages.
During this occasion it is eligible to stress that the individual restitution cases, though all
complicated, are of different complexity; is some of them, it was necessary due to existence
of many type-different disputes to treat them separately (e.g. in the Colloredo-Mannsfeld
case there are four the basic groups); this was the main cause for different extent of
individual cases. The most complicated case (Colloredo-Mannsfeld) is occupying over
hundred pages of this thesis, whereas the least complicated case (Thun-Hohenstein) just
seven.
The main focus of attention of this thesis is therefore the disputable cases of restitutions of
property. Even if it is the main goal of this thesis to serve the most comprehensive survey
of eight great restitution cases, this thesis remembers also the other cases of restitution of
property of former noble families. These other cases of disputable restitutions of property
of former noble families, and also the restitutions cases, in which the claimants from former
noble families received their property based on agreements, as well as more important
transfers of property from state to municipalities, restitutions of property to the Church and
related requests for restitution of property, are mentioned in this essay in well-arranged
summary sheets in supplements to the thesis; these overviews were never elaborated in
such a great detail in any expert work.
Finally, this thesis also briefly evaluates the media picture of restitutions of former noble
families as was created in nationwide and regional daily newspapers, this at each analyzed
566
case separately; the effort is to point out some excesses in news service, which were without
the borders of matter-of-fact informing about the specific case. In relation to this it is eligible
to remember that I dealt with the issue of periodical press ownership in separate monograph,
where it was generally reminded that the field of restitutions of property of former noble
families is one of the few areas in which there are remarkable excesses from fair-
mindedness of informing.
At the close, this doctoral thesis evaluates the possibilities of further development of
analyzed disputable restitutions of property of former noble families in the Czech Republic,
and in relation to this, it tries to provide reasoning for the fact why the development
of restitution of property in the Czech republic was as such and whether it was possible to
prevent complicated court cases by sophisticated and properly elaborated legal regulations.
Also, an extensive 20-pages chronology of the most important occurrences and events in
the individual restitution cases, as well as related event that took part during second world
war and consequential time period is also attached.
Keywords:
Restitution,
Des Fours-Walderode,
Colloredo-Mannsfeld, Salm-Reifferscheidt,
Trauttmansdorff-Weinsberg, Kinsky,
Harrach, Thun-Hohenstein, Schaumburg-Lippe
5β7
Obsah
Poděkování
..........................................................................................................................3
Předmluva
............................................................................................................................5
I. Úvod do problematiky
.....................................................................................................13
1.1
Důvody zvolení tématu
-
osobní motivace, zhodnocení pramenů a dosavadní
literatury
к
tématu
....................................................................................................13
1.
2
Metodika
..................................................................................................................17
I.3. Předmět zájmu studie (definice hranic tématu, přiblížení základů obsahu, tj.
rámcové postižení restitucí majetku bývalých šlechtických rodů v letech
1989-2010
a detailní analýza vybraných sporných kauz)
..........................................................17
1.
4
Historické souvislosti (od představ prezidenta Masaryka o pozemkové reformě,
přes mezinárodní smlouvy uzavřené po ukončení druhé světové války
(zejména tzv. Pařížská reparační dohoda), dekrety presidenta republiky
a poválečné zákony, zejména zákon o revisi první pozemkové reformy)
.................19
1.5. Politické a další předpoklady restitucí majetku po roce
1989..................................33
1.6. Možná alternativní řešení
.......................................................................................37
1.
7.
Rozsah a důsledky restitucí, vliv restitucí na jistotu vlastnických vztahů a právní
prostředí v České republice
....................................................................................40
II.
Legislativní rámec
..........................................................................................................47
11.1.
Postavení restitučních a souvisejících právních předpisů v rámci českého
právního řádu; obcházení smyslu a účelu restitučního zákonodárství:
občanskoprávní žaloby na určení vlastnictví
..........................................................47
11.2. Zákon o zmírnění následků některých majetkových křivd
-
původní znění
...........52
11.
3.
Novelizované znění zákona o zmírnění následků některých majetkových křivd/
komentář
...............................................................................................................59
11.4. Zákon o mimosoudních rehabilitacích
-
původní znění
.........................................73
11.
5.
Novelizované znění zákona o mimosoudních rehabilitacích/ komentář
.................85
11.
6.
Zákon o úpravě vlastnických vztahů
к
půdě a jinému zemědělskému majetku
-
původní znění
......................................................................................................106
11.
7.
Novelizované znění zákona o úpravě vlastnických vztahů
к
půdě a jinému
zemědělskému majetku/ komentář
.......................................................................120
11.
8.
Zákon č.
243/1992
Sb., kterým se upravují některé otázky související se
zákonem č.
229/1991
Sb.
-
původní znění
..........................................................156
11.
9.
Novelizované znění zákona č.
243/1992
Sb., kterým se upravují některé otázky
související se zákonem č.
229/1991
Sb
...............................................................159
III.
Restituce majetku bývalých šlechtických rodů v letech
1989-2010........................165
111.1.
Restituce obecně; jejich rozčlenění (restituce církevního majetku, židovského
majetku, majetku bývalých šlechtických rodů a ostatního majetku),
kategorizace restitucí majetku bývalých šlechtických rodů
.................................165
111.
2.
Nároky uplatňované převážně cestou restitučních právních předpisů
.................167
III.2.A. Kauza
Des Fours-Walderode
......................................................................167
I1I.2.A.1. majetek dřínovské větve rodiny
Des
Fours-Walderode
.............................167
ІІІ.2.А.2.
majetek smržovsko-hruborohozecké větve rodiny
Des
Fours-Walderode.
170
III.2.B. Kauza Colloredo-Mannsfeld
........................................................................220
HI.2.B.1
.
majetek opočenské větve rodiny Colloredo-Mannsfeld
.............................221
III.2.B.2. majetek dobříšsko-zbirožské větve rodiny Colloredo-Mannsfeld
...............287
IH.2.C. Kauza Salm-Reifferscheidt
..........................................................................324
III.2.D. Kauza Trauttmansdorff-Weinsberg
..............................................................372
111.3. Nároky uplatňované převážně cestou občanskoprávních žalob na určení
vlastnictví
............................................................................................................383
III.3.A. Kauza Kinsky
...............................................................................................383
ІІІ.З.В.
Kauza Harrach
............................................................................................415
ІІІ.З.С.
Kauza Thun-Hohenstein
..............................................................................453
III.3.D.
Kauza Schaumburg-Lippe
...........................................................................460
570
IV.
Závěr
............................................................................................................................477
IV.
1
Zhodnocení možností dalšího vývoje dosud neuzavřených restitičních kauz
bývalých šlechtických rodů v ČR
.........................................................................477
IV.2 Důvody vzniku současného stavu restitučních sporů
..........................................478
IV.
3
Pokus o prognózu (možnosti a směry dalšího vývoje restitucí majetku
bývalých šlechtických rodů)
.................................................................................481
VII.
Prameny a literatura
...................................................................................................483
VII.1 Prameny
............................................................................................................483
VI
1.
2
Literatura
............................................................................................................497
VIII.
Seznam použitých zkratek
........................................................................................503
IX.
Chronologie restitučních kauz
...................................................................................507
X.
Přílohy
...........................................................................................................................531
X.1 Restituce, ohledně kterých nebyly vedeny soudní spory
-
shrnutí
........................531
X.2 Restituce, ohledně kterých byly,
resp.
jsou vedeny soudní spory
-
shrnutí
..........534
X.3 Převody majetku obcím, restituce majetku církvím a související požadavky
na vydání majetku
-
shrnutí
.................................................................................537
X.4 Návštěvní kniha říšského protektora Konstantina
von Neurath -
vybrané části....
538
VI.
Abstrakt
.......................................................................................................................561
V.
Summary
......................................................................................................................565
Výtahy z
oponentských
posudků
....................................................................................571
571
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Benda, Josef |
| author_facet | Benda, Josef |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Benda, Josef |
| author_variant | j b jb |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV037487640 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)734087870 (DE-599)BVBBV037487640 |
| era | Geschichte 1989-2013 gnd Geschichte 1989-2010 gnd |
| era_facet | Geschichte 1989-2013 Geschichte 1989-2010 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02811nam a2200625 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV037487640</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20131018 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">110622s2010 a||| |||| 00||| cze d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9788086729619</subfield><subfield code="9">978-80-86729-61-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)734087870</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV037487640</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">cze</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-M457</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">7,41</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Benda, Josef</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Restituce majetku bývalých šlechtických rodů po roce 1989</subfield><subfield code="c">Josef Benda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Praha</subfield><subfield code="b">Národohospodářský Ústav Josefa Hlávky</subfield><subfield code="c">2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">571 S.</subfield><subfield code="b">Ill.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Studie Národohospodářského ústavu Josefa Hlávky</subfield><subfield code="v">2010,8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zsfassung in engl. Sprache</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1989-2013</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1989-2010</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Adel</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4000464-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rückerstattung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4178639-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Eigentum</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4013793-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Böhmische Länder</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4069573-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Tschechien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4303381-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Böhmische Länder</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4069573-6</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Tschechien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4303381-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Adel</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4000464-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Eigentum</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4013793-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Rückerstattung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4178639-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="5"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1989-2010</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Böhmische Länder</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4069573-6</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Tschechien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4303381-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Adel</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4000464-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Eigentum</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4013793-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Rückerstattung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4178639-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="5"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1989-2013</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Studie Národohospodářského ústavu Josefa Hlávky</subfield><subfield code="v">2010,8</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV036101616</subfield><subfield code="9">2010,8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=022639056&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=022639056&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-022639056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="883" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="8">1\p</subfield><subfield code="a">cgwrk</subfield><subfield code="d">20201028</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-101</subfield><subfield code="u">https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09049</subfield><subfield code="g">4371</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090511</subfield><subfield code="g">4371</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Böhmische Länder (DE-588)4069573-6 gnd Tschechien (DE-588)4303381-7 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Böhmische Länder Tschechien |
| id | DE-604.BV037487640 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T23:25:13Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9788086729619 |
| language | Czech |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-022639056 |
| oclc_num | 734087870 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-M457 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-M457 |
| physical | 571 S. Ill. |
| publishDate | 2010 |
| publishDateSearch | 2010 |
| publishDateSort | 2010 |
| publisher | Národohospodářský Ústav Josefa Hlávky |
| record_format | marc |
| series | Studie Národohospodářského ústavu Josefa Hlávky |
| series2 | Studie Národohospodářského ústavu Josefa Hlávky |
| spelling | Benda, Josef Verfasser aut Restituce majetku bývalých šlechtických rodů po roce 1989 Josef Benda Praha Národohospodářský Ústav Josefa Hlávky 2010 571 S. Ill. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Studie Národohospodářského ústavu Josefa Hlávky 2010,8 Zsfassung in engl. Sprache Geschichte 1989-2013 gnd rswk-swf Geschichte 1989-2010 gnd rswk-swf Adel (DE-588)4000464-8 gnd rswk-swf Rückerstattung (DE-588)4178639-7 gnd rswk-swf Eigentum (DE-588)4013793-4 gnd rswk-swf Böhmische Länder (DE-588)4069573-6 gnd rswk-swf Tschechien (DE-588)4303381-7 gnd rswk-swf Böhmische Länder (DE-588)4069573-6 g Tschechien (DE-588)4303381-7 g Adel (DE-588)4000464-8 s Eigentum (DE-588)4013793-4 s Rückerstattung (DE-588)4178639-7 s Geschichte 1989-2010 z DE-604 Geschichte 1989-2013 z 1\p DE-604 Studie Národohospodářského ústavu Josefa Hlávky 2010,8 (DE-604)BV036101616 2010,8 Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=022639056&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=022639056&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Abstract 1\p cgwrk 20201028 DE-101 https://d-nb.info/provenance/plan#cgwrk |
| spellingShingle | Benda, Josef Restituce majetku bývalých šlechtických rodů po roce 1989 Studie Národohospodářského ústavu Josefa Hlávky Adel (DE-588)4000464-8 gnd Rückerstattung (DE-588)4178639-7 gnd Eigentum (DE-588)4013793-4 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4000464-8 (DE-588)4178639-7 (DE-588)4013793-4 (DE-588)4069573-6 (DE-588)4303381-7 |
| title | Restituce majetku bývalých šlechtických rodů po roce 1989 |
| title_auth | Restituce majetku bývalých šlechtických rodů po roce 1989 |
| title_exact_search | Restituce majetku bývalých šlechtických rodů po roce 1989 |
| title_full | Restituce majetku bývalých šlechtických rodů po roce 1989 Josef Benda |
| title_fullStr | Restituce majetku bývalých šlechtických rodů po roce 1989 Josef Benda |
| title_full_unstemmed | Restituce majetku bývalých šlechtických rodů po roce 1989 Josef Benda |
| title_short | Restituce majetku bývalých šlechtických rodů po roce 1989 |
| title_sort | restituce majetku byvalych slechtickych rodu po roce 1989 |
| topic | Adel (DE-588)4000464-8 gnd Rückerstattung (DE-588)4178639-7 gnd Eigentum (DE-588)4013793-4 gnd |
| topic_facet | Adel Rückerstattung Eigentum Böhmische Länder Tschechien |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=022639056&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=022639056&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| volume_link | (DE-604)BV036101616 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bendajosef restitucemajetkubyvalychslechtickychroduporoce1989 |