Rationality and the reflective mind:
"In this book, Keith Stanovich attempts to resolve the Great Rationality Debate in cognitive science-the debate about how much irrationality to ascribe to human cognition. Stanovich shows how the insights of dual-process theory and evolutionary psychology can be combined to explain why humans a...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
New York
Oxford University Press
2011
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Zusammenfassung: | "In this book, Keith Stanovich attempts to resolve the Great Rationality Debate in cognitive science-the debate about how much irrationality to ascribe to human cognition. Stanovich shows how the insights of dual-process theory and evolutionary psychology can be combined to explain why humans are sometimes irrational even though they possess cognitive machinery of remarkable adaptiveness. Using a unique individual differences approach, Stanovich shows that to fully characterize differences in rational thinking, the traditional System 2 of dual-process theory must be partitioned into the reflective mind and the algorithmic mind. He posits that we need to supersede dual-process theories with tripartite models of cognition. The key operations of the algorithmic mind and the reflective mind that support human rationality are discussed in the book. The key function of the algorithmic mind is to sustain the processing of decoupled secondary representations in cognitive simulation. The key function of the reflective mind, in contrast, is to detect the need to interrupt autonomous processing and to begin simulation activities. Stanovich uses the algorithmic/reflective distinction to develop a taxonomy of cognitive errors that are made on tasks in the heuristics and biases literature. He presents empirical data to show that the tendency to make these thinking errors is only modestly related to intelligence. Using the new tripartite model of mind, Stanovich shows how rationality is a more encompassing construct than intelligence-when both are properly defined-and that IQ tests fail to assess individual differences in rational thought. Stanovich discusses the types of thinking processes that would be measured in an assessment of rational thinking"--Provided by publisher |
| Beschreibung: | Includes bibliographical references (p. 247-301) and indexes |
| Beschreibung: | xi, 328 S. Illustrationen |
| ISBN: | 9780195341140 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV037405572 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20180522 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 110518s2011 a||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780195341140 |c hbk |9 978-0-19-534114-0 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)648932780 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV037405572 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-19 |a DE-29 |a DE-12 |a DE-703 |a DE-11 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 153.4/3 |2 22 | |
| 084 | |a CC 5500 |0 (DE-625)17640: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a CP 4000 |0 (DE-625)18984: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a 5,1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Stanovich, Keith E. |d 1950- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)140053484 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Rationality and the reflective mind |c Keith E. Stanovich |
| 246 | 1 | 3 | |a Rationality & the reflective mind |
| 264 | 1 | |a New York |b Oxford University Press |c 2011 | |
| 300 | |a xi, 328 S. |b Illustrationen | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Includes bibliographical references (p. 247-301) and indexes | ||
| 520 | |a "In this book, Keith Stanovich attempts to resolve the Great Rationality Debate in cognitive science-the debate about how much irrationality to ascribe to human cognition. Stanovich shows how the insights of dual-process theory and evolutionary psychology can be combined to explain why humans are sometimes irrational even though they possess cognitive machinery of remarkable adaptiveness. Using a unique individual differences approach, Stanovich shows that to fully characterize differences in rational thinking, the traditional System 2 of dual-process theory must be partitioned into the reflective mind and the algorithmic mind. He posits that we need to supersede dual-process theories with tripartite models of cognition. The key operations of the algorithmic mind and the reflective mind that support human rationality are discussed in the book. The key function of the algorithmic mind is to sustain the processing of decoupled secondary representations in cognitive simulation. The key function of the reflective mind, in contrast, is to detect the need to interrupt autonomous processing and to begin simulation activities. Stanovich uses the algorithmic/reflective distinction to develop a taxonomy of cognitive errors that are made on tasks in the heuristics and biases literature. He presents empirical data to show that the tendency to make these thinking errors is only modestly related to intelligence. Using the new tripartite model of mind, Stanovich shows how rationality is a more encompassing construct than intelligence-when both are properly defined-and that IQ tests fail to assess individual differences in rational thought. Stanovich discusses the types of thinking processes that would be measured in an assessment of rational thinking"--Provided by publisher | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Reasoning (Psychology) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Individual differences | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Intellect | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Cognition | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Verstand |0 (DE-588)4188037-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rationalität |0 (DE-588)4048507-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Kognition |0 (DE-588)4031630-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Vernunft |0 (DE-588)4063106-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Verstand |0 (DE-588)4188037-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Kognition |0 (DE-588)4031630-0 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Vernunft |0 (DE-588)4063106-0 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Rationalität |0 (DE-588)4048507-9 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m V:DE-604 |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=022558158&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-022558158 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804145700594778112 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | IMAGE 1
CONTENTS
1. DUAL-PROCESS THEORY AND THE GREAT RATIONALITY DEBATE 3
771EGREAT RATIONALITY DEBATE 6 INDIVIDUAL D![FERENCESIN THE GREAT
RATIONALITY DEBATE 10 DUAL-PROCESSTHEORY:THE CURRENT STATE (IF PLAY 16
PROPERTIES(IFTYPE 1 AMI TYPE 2 PROCESSINJ? 19
DUAL-PROCESSTHEORY AMI HUMAN GOALS: IMPLICATIONSFOR THE
RATIONALITY DEBATE 22 THE REST OF77LIS BOOK: COMPLICATIONS IN
DUAL-PROCESSTHEORY
AMI THEIR IMPLICATIONSFOR THE CONCEPTS OF RATIONALITY AMI INTELL(LIENCE
25 2. DIFFERENTIATING THE ALGORITHMIC MIND AND THE REFLECTIVE MIND 29
UNPACKINJ?TYPE 2 FUNCTIONINJ?USING INDIVIDUAL DIFJERENCES 31
CO,LINITIVE ABILITY AMI THINKINJ? DISPOSITIONS PARTITION THE
AL,LIORITHMICAND THE R~FIECTIVEMIND 35 INTELLI,LIENCE TESTS AMI
CRITICAL771INKIN,LI TESTS PARTITION THE ALJ?ORITHMICFROM THE
R~FIECTIVEMIND 39 THINKIN,LI DISPOSITIONS AS INDEPENDENT PREDICTORSOF
RATIONAL THOUGHT 43 3. THE KEY FUNCTIONS OF THE REFLECTIVE MIND AND THE
ALGORITHMIC MIND THAT SUPPORT HUMAN RATIONALITY 47
SO-CALLED EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONINJ? MEASURES TAP THE ALGORITHMIC MIND AND
NOT THE R~FIECTIVE MIND 56
IMAGE 2
155
175
X CONTENTS
4. THE TRI-PROCESS MODEL AND SERIAL ASSOCIATIVE COGNITION 01
THE COGNITIVE MISER ALLII FOCAL BIAS 65
CONVETGING EVIDENCE IN THE DUAL-PROCESS LITERATURE 72 5. THE MASTER
RATIONALITY MOTIVE AND THE ORIGINS OF THE
NONAUTONOMOUS MIND 81 METAREPRESENTATIONAND H(S.;HER-ORDERPRIFERENCES 81
WHAT MOTIVATES THE SEARCHJOR RATIONAL INTEGRATION? 86
THE MASTER RATIONALITY MOTIVE AS A PSYCHOLOGICALCONSTRUCT 87
EVOLUTIONARY ORIGILLS OF THE MASTER RATIONAL MOTIVE ALLII TYPE 2
PROCESSING 90 6. A TAXONOJL1YOFRATIONAL THINKING PROBLEMS )5
(KEITH E. STANOVICH AND RICHARD F.WEST)
DUAL-PROCESSTI1EORYALLII KNOWLEDGE STRUCTURES 95 THE PRELIMINARY
TAXONORNY 98 HEURISTICS AND BIASES TASKS IN URRNS OJTHE 1Z1XMLORNY 104
MULTIPLY-DETERRNINED PROBLEMS !F RATIONAL THOLTGHT 112
MISSING INPUT JRORN THE AUTONOMOLLS MILLII 115
7. INTELLIGENCE AS A PREDICTOR OF PERFORMANCE ON
HEURISTICS AND BIASES TASKS 121
(KEITH E. STANOVICH AND RICHARD F.WEST)
INTELLIGENCEAND CLASSIC HEURISTICS AND BIASES EIFECTS 125 BELIIF BIAS
ALLII MYSIDE BIAS 135
R-VHYTILINKING BIASES DO ALLII DO NOT ASSOCIATE WITH COGNITIVE ABILITY
139 COGNITIVE DECOUPLING, MI,LDWARE GAPS, ALLII OVERRIDE DETEETION IN
HEURISTICS AND BIASES TASKS 145 8. RATIONALITY AND INTELLIGENCE:
EMPIRICAL AND THEORETICAL
RELATIONSHIPS AND HL1PLICATIONS FOR THE GREAT RATIONALITY DEBATE
INTELLIGENCEAND RATIONALI TY ASSOCIATIOLLSIN URMS OF THE TAXONORNY 155
SUMMARY OJTHE RELATIONSHIPS 163 INDIVIDUAL DIJFERENCES,THE R~FIECTIVE
MILUI, AND THC GRCAT RATIONALITY DCBATC 164 SKCPTICISRNABOUT
MINDWARE-CAUSCD IRRATIMWLITICS 170 9. THE SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS
OFSEPARATING THE CONCEPTS OF
INTELLIGENCE AND RATIONALITY BROMI VERSUS NARROW CONCCPTS OJINTELLIGCNCC
175 INTCLL(S.;ERZCE IRNPERIALIS/LL 178
IMAGE 3
LNTELLIGERLEEMISIDENT!JIED ASADAPTATION AMI THE
DE!JIEATION 0/ LNTELLIGENEE 183 STRATEGIES10R CUTTING LNTELLIGENEE DOWN
TO SIZE 185
SOCIETY S SE/EETIONMECHANISMS 186
IO. THE ASSESSMENT OFRATIONAL THOUGHT
(KEITH E. STANOVICH, RICHARD EWEST, AND MAGGIE E. TOPLAK) A FRAMEWORK10R
THE ASSESSMENT (1 RATIONAL THINKING 191 OPERATIONALIZING THE COMPONENTS
CF RATIONAL THOUGHT 194
THE FUTURE CF RESEARCH ON INDIVIDUAL DIJJERENEESIN
RATIONAL 77IOUGHT 245
REFERENCES
AUTHOR INDEX
SUBJECT INDEX
CONTENTS XL
191
247
33
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Stanovich, Keith E. 1950- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)140053484 |
| author_facet | Stanovich, Keith E. 1950- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Stanovich, Keith E. 1950- |
| author_variant | k e s ke kes |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV037405572 |
| classification_rvk | CC 5500 CP 4000 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)648932780 (DE-599)BVBBV037405572 |
| dewey-full | 153.4/3 |
| dewey-hundreds | 100 - Philosophy & psychology |
| dewey-ones | 153 - Conscious mental processes & intelligence |
| dewey-raw | 153.4/3 |
| dewey-search | 153.4/3 |
| dewey-sort | 3153.4 13 |
| dewey-tens | 150 - Psychology |
| discipline | Psychologie Philosophie |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03691nam a2200505 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV037405572</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20180522 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">110518s2011 a||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780195341140</subfield><subfield code="c">hbk</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-19-534114-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)648932780</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV037405572</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">153.4/3</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CC 5500</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)17640:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CP 4000</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)18984:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5,1</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Stanovich, Keith E.</subfield><subfield code="d">1950-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)140053484</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rationality and the reflective mind</subfield><subfield code="c">Keith E. Stanovich</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Rationality & the reflective mind</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">New York</subfield><subfield code="b">Oxford University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xi, 328 S.</subfield><subfield code="b">Illustrationen</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references (p. 247-301) and indexes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"In this book, Keith Stanovich attempts to resolve the Great Rationality Debate in cognitive science-the debate about how much irrationality to ascribe to human cognition. Stanovich shows how the insights of dual-process theory and evolutionary psychology can be combined to explain why humans are sometimes irrational even though they possess cognitive machinery of remarkable adaptiveness. Using a unique individual differences approach, Stanovich shows that to fully characterize differences in rational thinking, the traditional System 2 of dual-process theory must be partitioned into the reflective mind and the algorithmic mind. He posits that we need to supersede dual-process theories with tripartite models of cognition. The key operations of the algorithmic mind and the reflective mind that support human rationality are discussed in the book. The key function of the algorithmic mind is to sustain the processing of decoupled secondary representations in cognitive simulation. The key function of the reflective mind, in contrast, is to detect the need to interrupt autonomous processing and to begin simulation activities. Stanovich uses the algorithmic/reflective distinction to develop a taxonomy of cognitive errors that are made on tasks in the heuristics and biases literature. He presents empirical data to show that the tendency to make these thinking errors is only modestly related to intelligence. Using the new tripartite model of mind, Stanovich shows how rationality is a more encompassing construct than intelligence-when both are properly defined-and that IQ tests fail to assess individual differences in rational thought. Stanovich discusses the types of thinking processes that would be measured in an assessment of rational thinking"--Provided by publisher</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Reasoning (Psychology)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Individual differences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Intellect</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cognition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Verstand</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4188037-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rationalität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048507-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kognition</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4031630-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Vernunft</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4063106-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Verstand</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4188037-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Kognition</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4031630-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Vernunft</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4063106-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Rationalität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048507-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">V:DE-604</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=022558158&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-022558158</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV037405572 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T23:23:37Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780195341140 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-022558158 |
| oclc_num | 648932780 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-29 DE-12 DE-703 DE-11 |
| owner_facet | DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-29 DE-12 DE-703 DE-11 |
| physical | xi, 328 S. Illustrationen |
| publishDate | 2011 |
| publishDateSearch | 2011 |
| publishDateSort | 2011 |
| publisher | Oxford University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Stanovich, Keith E. 1950- Verfasser (DE-588)140053484 aut Rationality and the reflective mind Keith E. Stanovich Rationality & the reflective mind New York Oxford University Press 2011 xi, 328 S. Illustrationen txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Includes bibliographical references (p. 247-301) and indexes "In this book, Keith Stanovich attempts to resolve the Great Rationality Debate in cognitive science-the debate about how much irrationality to ascribe to human cognition. Stanovich shows how the insights of dual-process theory and evolutionary psychology can be combined to explain why humans are sometimes irrational even though they possess cognitive machinery of remarkable adaptiveness. Using a unique individual differences approach, Stanovich shows that to fully characterize differences in rational thinking, the traditional System 2 of dual-process theory must be partitioned into the reflective mind and the algorithmic mind. He posits that we need to supersede dual-process theories with tripartite models of cognition. The key operations of the algorithmic mind and the reflective mind that support human rationality are discussed in the book. The key function of the algorithmic mind is to sustain the processing of decoupled secondary representations in cognitive simulation. The key function of the reflective mind, in contrast, is to detect the need to interrupt autonomous processing and to begin simulation activities. Stanovich uses the algorithmic/reflective distinction to develop a taxonomy of cognitive errors that are made on tasks in the heuristics and biases literature. He presents empirical data to show that the tendency to make these thinking errors is only modestly related to intelligence. Using the new tripartite model of mind, Stanovich shows how rationality is a more encompassing construct than intelligence-when both are properly defined-and that IQ tests fail to assess individual differences in rational thought. Stanovich discusses the types of thinking processes that would be measured in an assessment of rational thinking"--Provided by publisher Reasoning (Psychology) Individual differences Intellect Cognition Verstand (DE-588)4188037-7 gnd rswk-swf Rationalität (DE-588)4048507-9 gnd rswk-swf Kognition (DE-588)4031630-0 gnd rswk-swf Vernunft (DE-588)4063106-0 gnd rswk-swf Verstand (DE-588)4188037-7 s Kognition (DE-588)4031630-0 s Vernunft (DE-588)4063106-0 s Rationalität (DE-588)4048507-9 s DE-604 V:DE-604 application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=022558158&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Stanovich, Keith E. 1950- Rationality and the reflective mind Reasoning (Psychology) Individual differences Intellect Cognition Verstand (DE-588)4188037-7 gnd Rationalität (DE-588)4048507-9 gnd Kognition (DE-588)4031630-0 gnd Vernunft (DE-588)4063106-0 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4188037-7 (DE-588)4048507-9 (DE-588)4031630-0 (DE-588)4063106-0 |
| title | Rationality and the reflective mind |
| title_alt | Rationality & the reflective mind |
| title_auth | Rationality and the reflective mind |
| title_exact_search | Rationality and the reflective mind |
| title_full | Rationality and the reflective mind Keith E. Stanovich |
| title_fullStr | Rationality and the reflective mind Keith E. Stanovich |
| title_full_unstemmed | Rationality and the reflective mind Keith E. Stanovich |
| title_short | Rationality and the reflective mind |
| title_sort | rationality and the reflective mind |
| topic | Reasoning (Psychology) Individual differences Intellect Cognition Verstand (DE-588)4188037-7 gnd Rationalität (DE-588)4048507-9 gnd Kognition (DE-588)4031630-0 gnd Vernunft (DE-588)4063106-0 gnd |
| topic_facet | Reasoning (Psychology) Individual differences Intellect Cognition Verstand Rationalität Kognition Vernunft |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=022558158&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT stanovichkeithe rationalityandthereflectivemind AT stanovichkeithe rationalitythereflectivemind |