International investment law and comparative public law:
Gespeichert in:
| Weitere Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Oxford [u.a.]
Oxford Univ. Press
2010
|
| Ausgabe: | 1. publ. |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | LXXXIII, 836 S. |
| ISBN: | 9780199589104 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV036860741 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20150128 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 101209s2010 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780199589104 |9 978-0-19-958910-4 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)699546415 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV036860741 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-29 |a DE-12 |a DE-19 |a DE-11 |a DE-M382 |a DE-703 |a DE-739 | ||
| 084 | |a PR 2353 |0 (DE-625)139576: |2 rvk | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a International investment law and comparative public law |c ed. by Stephan W. Schill |
| 250 | |a 1. publ. | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Oxford [u.a.] |b Oxford Univ. Press |c 2010 | |
| 300 | |a LXXXIII, 836 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Auslandsinvestition |0 (DE-588)4003772-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Innerstaatliches Recht |0 (DE-588)4161814-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsvergleich |0 (DE-588)4115712-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Internationales Recht |0 (DE-588)4027447-0 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4143413-4 |a Aufsatzsammlung |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Auslandsinvestition |0 (DE-588)4003772-1 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Internationales Recht |0 (DE-588)4027447-0 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Innerstaatliches Recht |0 (DE-588)4161814-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Rechtsvergleich |0 (DE-588)4115712-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Schill, Stephan W. |d 1976- |0 (DE-588)139292497 |4 edt | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m SWB Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=020776505&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-020776505 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804143560159657984 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | IMAGE 1
CONTENTS-SUMMARY
TABLEOF CASES TABLEOF TREATIES,LEGISLATION,AND RELATED INSTRUMENTS LIST
OFABBREVIATIONS LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS
XXXI LVII
LXXVII LXXXI
I CONCEPT AND FOUNDATIONS
1. INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW AND COMPARATIVE PUBLIC LAW-AN
INTRODUCTION STEPHAN W SCHILL
2. MINIMUM STANDARDS OF PROCEDURAL JUSTICE IN ADMINISTRATIVE
ADJUDICATION
GIACINTO DELLA CANANEA
3. PUBLIC LAW CONCEPTS TO BALANCE INVESTORS RIGHTS WITH STATE
REGULATORY ACTIONS IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST-THE CONCEPT OF PROPORTIONALITY
BENEDICT KINGSBURYAND STEPHAN W SCHILL
3
39
75
II INVESTOR RIGHTS IN
COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE
4. THE CONCEPT OF INDIRECT EXPROPRIATION IN COMPARATIVE PUBLIC
LAW-SEARCHING FOR LIGHT IN THE DARK 107
MARKUS PERKAMS
5. FAIR AND EQUITABLE TREATMENT, THE RULE OF LAW, AND COMPARATIVE PUBLIC
LAW 151
STEPHAN W SCHILL
6. FULL PROTECTION AND SECURITY 183
HELGEELISABETHZEITLER
7. CAIN AND ABEL: CONGRUENCE AND CONFLICT IN THE APPLICATION OF THE
DENIAL OFJUSTICE PRINCIPLE 213
ALI EHSASSI
8. THE MERITS AND LIMITS OFCOMPARATIVISM: NATIONAL TREATMENT IN
INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW AND THE WTO 243
JURGEN KURTZ
XI
IMAGE 2
CONTENTS-SUMMARY
9. DISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF NATIONALITY: DETERMINING LIKENESS IN
HUMAN RIGHTS AND INVESTMENT LAW 279
FREYA BAETENS 10. UMBRELLA CLAUSES AS PUBLIC LAW CONCEPTS IN COMPARATIVE
PERSPECTIVE 317
STEPHAN W SCHILL
11. TRANSFER OF FUNDS: THE INTERACTION BETWEEN THE IMF ARTICLES OF
AGREEMENT AND MODERN INVESTMENT TREATIES: A COMPARATIVE LAW PERSPECTIVE
345
ABBA KOLO
III COMPARATIVE ADMINISTRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL
LAW ON SELECTED ISSUES
12. STATE RESPONSIBILITY AND COMPARATIVE STATE LIABILITY FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGISLATIVE HARM TO ECONOMIC INTERESTS 377
IRMGARD MARBOE
13. LEGITIMATE EXPECTATIONS AND INFORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE REPRESENTATIONS
413
HECTOR A. MAIRAL 14. REVOCATION AND CANCELLATION OF CONCESSIONS,
OPERATING LICENCES, AND OTHER BENEFICIAL ADMINISTRATIVE ACTS 453
KIM TALUS
15. PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS: AWARD, PERFORMANCE, AND REMEDIES 475
CATHERINE DONNELLY 16. ECONOMIC EMERGENCY POWERS: A COMPARATIVE LAW
PERSPECTIVE 503 CHRISTINA BINDER AND AUGUST REINISCH 17. PROPERTY
PROTECTION AND PROTECTION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE 541
FEDERICO LENZERINI 18. TAXATION AND INVESTMENT: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
LIMITATIONS ON TAX LEGISLATION IN CONTEXT 569
CHRISTIAN TIETJE AND KAROLINE KAMPERMANN 19. COMPARATIVE TAXATION
PROCEDURE AND TAX ENFORCEMENT 599
PAUL B. STEPHAN
XII
IMAGE 3
CONTENTS-SUMMARY
IV DISPUTE SETTLEMENT, ARBITRAL PROCEDURE, AND REMEDIES
20. INVESTMENT TREATY ARBITRATION, PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS, AND THE RULE OF
LAW GUS VAN HARTEN
21. PROCEDURE IN INVESTMENT TREATY ARBITRATION AND THE RELEVANCE OF
COMPARATIVE PUBLIC LAW 659
CHESTER BROWN
627
22. THE NEED FOR PUBLIC LAW STANDARDS OF REVIEW IN INVESTOR-STATE
ARBITRATIONS
WILLIAM BURKE- WHITE AND ANDREAS VON STADEN
23. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY REMEDIES IN INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW AND
NATIONAL STATE LIABILITY: A FUNCTIONAL AND COMPARATIVE VIEW 721
ANNE VAN AAKEN
689
24. COMPARATIVE COMPENSATION FOR EXPROPRIATION BORZU SABAHI AND NICHOLAS
J BIRCH
25. TRANSPARENCY AND REPRESENTATION OF THE PUBLIC INTEREST IN INVESTMENT
TREATY ARBITRATION ALESSANDRA ASTERITI AND CHRISTIAN J TAMS
755
787
INDEX 817
XIII
IMAGE 4
CONTENTS
TABLE 0/ CASES TABLE OF TREATIES, LEGISLATION, AND RELATED INSTRUMENTS
LIST 0/ ABBREVIATIONS
LIST O/CONTRIBUTORS
XXXI
LVII
LXXVII
LXXXI
XV
CONCEPT AND FOUNDATIONS
1. INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW AND COMPARATIVE PUBLIC LAW-AN
INTRODUCTION 3
I. INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW AND ITS DISCONTENTS 4
II. INSTITUTIONAL REFORM OR SYSTEM-INTERNAL ADAPTATION? 7
III. INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW AS PUBLIC LAW 10
IV. INVESTMENT TREATY ARBITRATION AND GLOBAL GOVERNANCE 17
V. INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW AND COMPARATIVE PUBLIC LAW 23
VI. CONCLUSION 35
2. MINIMUM STANDARDS OF PROCEDURAL JUSTICE IN ADMINISTRATIVE
ADJUDICATION 39
I. INTRODUCTION 39
A. GOALS AND STRUCTURE OF THE CHAPTER 39
B. THE STUDY OF COMMON PRINCIPLES AS THE MOST IMPORTANT TASK FOR
COMPARATIVE LAWYERS 42
C. WHY THE COMPARATIVE METHOD IS INCREASINGLY IMPORTANT IN THE FIELD OF
PUBLIC LAW 45
D. PROTECTING INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENTS: THE QUESTION OF STANDARDS 46
II. ARE THERE INVARIABLE LAWS? MONTESQUIEU, SMITH, AND TOCQUEVILLE 49 A.
UNIVERSALISM AND PARTICULARITIES IN MONRESQUIEU 49
B. ADAM SMITH S CONCEPTION OF GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF LAW 51
C. TOCQUEVILLE S REGLESINVARIABLES 53
D. HEGEL AND THE SEPARATION BETWEEN NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL LAW 54
III. PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS OF LAW IN ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION 56 A.
A METHODOLOGICAL PREMISE 56
B. DUE PROCESS OF LAW: PROCEDURE AND SUBSTANCE 57
C. ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION WITHIN THE OECD 59
D. THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD: BEYOND NOTICE 60
E. TRANSPARENCY AND ACCESS TO FILES 65
IMAGE 5
CONTENTS
F. THE DUTY TO GIVE REASONS 67
IV. THE MINIMUM STANDARDS OF PROCEDURAL JUSTICE 69
A. NEW STANDARDS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES 69
B. THE CONCEPT OF MINIMUM STANDARD 71
C. AN ECHELLEDESGARANTIES 73
3. PUBLIC LAW CONCEPTS TO BALANCE INVESTORS RIGHTS WITH STATE
REGULATORY ACTIONS IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST-THE CONCEPT OF PROPORTIONALITY
75
I. INTRODUCTION 75
II. THE DEVELOPMENT AND DIFFUSION OF PROPORTIONALITY ANALYSIS 79
III. THE STRUCTURE OF PROPORTIONALITY ANALYSIS 85
A. SUITABILITY FOR A LEGITIMATE GOVERNMENT PURPOSE 86
B. NECESSITY 86
C. PROPORTIONALITY STRICTOSENSU 87
IV. APPLYING PROPORTIONALITY ANALYSIS IN INVESTOR-STATE ARBITRATION 88
A. PROPORTIONALITY ANALYSIS AND THE CONCEPT OFINDIRECT EXPROPRIATION 89
B. PROPORTIONALITY ANALYSIS AND FAIR AND EQUITABLE TREATMENT 96 C.
PROPORTIONALITY ANALYSIS AND NON-PRECLUDED MEASURES CLAUSES 98
V. CONCLUSION: PROPORTIONALITY ANALYSIS AND REASONING IN INVESTMENT
ARBITRATION 102
II INVESTOR RIGHTS IN
COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE
4. THE CONCEPT OFINDIRECT EXPROPRIATION IN COMPARATIVE PUBLIC
LAW-SEARCHING FOR LIGHT IN THE DARK 107
I. INTRODUCTION 107
II. INDIRECT EXPROPRIATION IN INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW AS IT STANDS
TODAY 109
III. INDIRECT EXPROPRIATION UNDER THE ECHR 112
A. PARTICULARITIES OFARTICLE 1 OF THE FIRST PROTOCOL TO THE ECHR 112 (1)
THE EXISTENCE OF A DUTY TO COMPENSATE 113
(2) THE IMPORTANCE OF THE RIGHT TO REGULATE 113
(3) THE JURISPRUDENCE ON OTHER INTERFERENCES WITH PROPERTY RIGHTS 114 B.
DEJACTO EXPROPRIATIONS UNDER ARTICLE 1(1)SENTENCE 2 114
C. THE CONTROL OF USE UNDER ARTICLE 1(2) 116
D. OTHER INTERFERENCES UNDER ARTICLE 1 119
E. SUMMARY OF THE JURISPRUDENCE ON ARTICLE 1 120
IV. GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF LAW 121
A. US CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 122
(1) THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE CURRENT JURISPRUDENCE 122
XVI
IMAGE 6
CONTENTS
(2) AD HOC ANALYSIS (3) PERSE RULES (4) SUMMARY OF US CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
B. GERMAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW (1) HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT (2) CURRENT
JURISPRUDENCE (3) SUMMARY OF GERMAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW C. LAW OF THE
EUROPEAN UNION (1) THE RIGHT TO PROPERTY IN EUROPEAN LAW (2)
EXPROPRIATION ACCORDING TO ARTICLE 17(1)SENTENCE 2 (3) REGULATIONS
ACCORDING TO ARTICLE 17(1)SENTENCE 3 (4) ARTICLE 340(2) OF THE TFEU (5)
SUMMARY OF THE LAW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
V. CONCLUSION
123 126 129 130
131 133 137 138 138 139 140 143 147
147
5. FAIR AND EQUITABLE TREATMENT, THE RULE OF LAW, AND COMPARATIVE PUBLIC
LAW 151 1. INTRODUCTION 151
II. CONCEPTUALIZING ARBITRAL JURISPRUDENCE: FAIR AND EQUITABLE TREATMENT
AS AN EMBODIMENT OF THE RULE OF LAW 155
A. PRINCIPLES DERIVED FROM FAIR AND EQUITABLE TREATMENT 159
(1) STABILITY, PREDICTABILITY, CONSISTENCY 160
(2) LEGALITY 162
(3) PROTECTION OFLEGITIMATE EXPECTATIONS 163
(4) ADMINISTRATIVE DUE PROCESS AND DENIAL OFJUSTICE 166
(5) PROTECTION AGAINST ARBITRARINESS AND DISCRIMINATION 167
(6) TRANSPARENCY 168
(7) REASONABLENESS AND PROPORTIONALITY 169
B. CONTEXTUALIZATION OF FAIR AND EQUITABLE TREATMENT IN THE SEPARATION
OF POWERS FRAMEWORK 170
(1) FAIR AND EQUITABLE TREATMENT AND DOMESTIC ADMINISTRATIVE LAW 170 (2)
FAIR AND EQUITABLE TREATMENT AND DOMESTIC JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS 172 (3)
FAIR AND EQUITABLE TREATMENT AND DOMESTIC LEGISLATION 173 C.
METHODOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE RULE OF LAW APPROACH 174
(1) COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DOMESTIC LEGAL SYSTEMS 175
(2) COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INTERNATIONAL LEGAL REGIMES 176
III. A NORMATIVE JUSTIFICATION OF THE RULE OF LAW APPROACH 176
A. THE TELEOLOGY OFINTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT TREATIES 177
B. INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS AND THE ROLE OF THE RULE OF LAW 177
IV. CONCLUSION 181
6. FULL PROTECTION AND SECURITY 183
1. INTRODUCTION 183
XVII
IMAGE 7
CONTENTS
II. OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE FULL PROTECTION AND SECURITY UNDER CUSTOMARY
INTERNATIONAL LAW 184
A. RELEVANCE OF CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW FOR INVESTMENT TREATY
INTERPRETATION 184
B. CUSTOMARY LAW PROTECTION AGAINST HARM CAUSED BY STATE OR PRIVATE
ACTORS 187
(1) COMPLICITY 187
(2) RESPONSIBILITY FOR FAILURE TO ACT 188
III. INVESTMENT LAW JURISPRUDENCE 190
A. HARM CAUSED BY THE STATE 191
B. HARM CAUSED BY PRIVATE ACTORS 192
(1) RESPONSIBILITY BASED ON COMPLICITY 192
(2) RESPONSIBILITY BASED ON FAILURE TO PROTECT 192
IV. THE INTERPRETATION OF DUE DILIGENCE 199
A. THE RELEVANCE OF GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF LAW 199
B. THE PROTECTION STANDARD 200
(1) ABSOLUTE OR RELATIVE STANDARD 200
(2) DEFERENCE TO STATE SOVEREIGNTY 203
(3) THE STANDARDS OF REASONABLENESS, NECESSITY, AND PROPORTIONALITY 206
(4) KNOWLEDGE AND FORESEEABILITY 208
(5) CAUSALITY 209
(6) CONFLICTING PRIVATE RIGHTS 210
V. CONCLUSION 211
7. CAIN AND ABEL: CONGRUENCE AND CONFLICT IN THE APPLICATION OF THE
DENIAL OF JUSTICE PRINCIPLE 213
I. HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT 217
II. SUBSTANTIVE BASIS FOR ALLEGING DENIAL OF JUSTICE 220
A. THE INVESTMENT CONTEXT 220
B. THE HUMAN RIGHTS CONTEXT 224
III. SIMILARITIES IN FACTUAL UNDERPINNINGS 225
A. FAILURE TO PROVIDE ACCESS AND REFUSAL TO ENFORCE JUDGMENTS 225 B.
DELAY 227
C. UNDUE PROCESS AND INADEQUACIES IN THE ADMINISTRATION OFJUSTICE 230 D.
MANIFESTLY UNJUST DECISION OR PRETENCE TO FORM 231
IV. DISTINCTIONS AND SIMILARITIES BETWEEN THE APPROACH OF INVESTMENT
TRIBUNALS AND HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANS 233
A. DISTINCT FUNCTIONS 233
B. VARYING PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS AS EVIDENCED IN THE APPLICATION OF
THE LOCAL REMEDIES RULE 234
C. SIMILARITIES IN THE OVERALL APPROACH OF INVESTMENT TRIBUNALS AND
HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANS 239
V. CONCLUSION 241
XVIII
IMAGE 8
CONTENTS
8. THE MERITS AND LIMITS OFCOMPARATIVISM: NATIONAL TREATMENT IN
INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW AND THE WTO 243
1. INTRODUCTION
II. NATIONAL TREATMENT ACROSS THE WTO AND INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW
246
A. THE LAW OF THE WTO: GATT ARTICLE III 246
B. NATIONAL TREATMENT IN INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW 249
III. COMPARING LEGAL NORMS AND SYSTEMS: A PROPOSED METHODOLOGY 250
243
IV. THE INTERPRETATIVE QUESTIONS AND CASES A. COMPETITION AS A NECESSARY
CONDITION OF LIKENESS B. WHAT CONSTITUTES LESS FAVOURABLE TREATMENT ?
(1) A MOST FAVOURED DOMESTIC INVESTOR STANDARD?
(2) A GROUP APPROACH TO LESS FAVOURABLE TREATMENT ? (3) SUMMING UP C.
NATIONAL TREATMENT AND PROTECTIONIST PURPOSE
V. CONCLUSION
255 255 262 264
267 272 272 277
9. DISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF NATIONALITY: DETERMINING LIKENESS IN
HUMAN RIGHTS AND INVESTMENT LAW
I. INTRODUCTION
279
279
II. NATIONALITY-BASED DISCRIMINATION CLAUSES 281
A. HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES: GENERAL NON-DISCRIMINATION CLAUSES 281 (1)
FIRST CATEGORY: NATIONALITY AS PART OF C NATIONAL ORIGIN 281
(2) SECOND CATEGORY: NATIONALITY AS PART OF OTHER STATUS 285
(3) THIRD CATEGORY: NATIONALITY AS AN UNCLASSIFIED GROUND 288 (4)
FOURTH CATEGORY: NATIONALITY AS AN EXPLICIT GROUND 289
(5) CONCLUSION: GENERAL PROHIBITION WITH SCOPE FOR EXCEPTIONS 290 B.
INVESTMENT TREATIES: MOST-FAVOURED-NATION AND NATIONAL TREATMENT CLAUSES
290
C. A BRIEF COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS 291
III. LIKENESS TESTS IN HUMAN RIGHTS AND INVESTMENT LAW 292
A. LIKENESS IN HUMAN RIGHTS LAW: INDIVIDUALS IN ANALOGOUS SITUATIONS 292
(1) LIKENESS AS A TREATY-CONCEPT 293
(2) STRUCTURE OF THE DISCRIMINATION ASSESSMENT EXERCISE 293
(3) PUBLIC-PRIVATE INTEREST BALANCING LIKENESS TEST 294
(4) RESULT: CROSS-TREATY UNIFORMITY 297
B. LIKENESS IN INVESTMENT LAW: INVESTMENT AND INVESTORS IN LIKE
CIRCUMSTANCES (1) TREATY REFERENCE TO IN LIKE CIRCUMSTANCES (2)
STRUCTURE OF THE DISCRIMINATION ASSESSMENT EXERCISE
(3) LIKENESS CRITERIA AND LEGITIMATE OBJECTIVES (4) DOUBLE SHIFT IN THE
BURDEN OF PROOF (5) RESULT: A LIKENESS TEST IN ITS INFANCY
297 298 299 299 305 307
XIX
IMAGE 9
CONTENTS
IV. COMPARISON OF LIKENESS TESTS IN HUMAN RIGHTS AND INVESTMENT LAW 307
A. STRUCTURE AND SCOPE OF THE LIKENESS TEST 307
(1) POSITION OF THE LIKENESS TEST IN THE DISCRIMINATION ASSESSMENT 308
(2) LINK BETWEEN THE LIKENESS TEST AND THE OBJECTIVES OF THE RESPECTIVE
FIELDS 308
(3) BURDEN OF PROOF 309
B. LIKENESS CRITERIA 309
(1) A NEGATIVE LIKENESS TEST 309
(2) ADDING THE PHRASE IN LIKE CIRCUMSTANCES ,
310
C. ROLE AND LIMITS OF THE REGULATORY CONTEXT 311
(1) STATE INTENT TO DISCRIMINATE? 311
(2) LEGITIMATE AIMS IN THE LIGHT OF SUBSIDIARITY AND PROPORTIONALITY 313
(3) CAUSAL LINK BETWEEN MEASURE AND AIM 314
V. CONCLUSION
314
10. UMBRELLA CLAUSES AS PUBLIC LAW CONCEPTS IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE
I. INTRODUCTION
317
317
II. THE JURISDICTIONAL FUNCTION OF UMBRELLA CLAUSES 321
A. TWO COMPETING APPROACHES: SOVEREIGN VERSUS COMMERCIAL CONDUCT 321 B.
THE CONTRACT CLAIM-TREATY CLAIM DISTINCTION 323
C. THE INDISTINGUISHABILITY OF COMMERCIAL AND SOVEREIGN CONDUCT 325
D. CONTRACT CLAIMS IN INTERNATIONAL DISPUTE SETTLEMENT 326
E. UMBRELLA CLAUSES ASAUTONOMOUS TREATY PROVISIONS 327
F. A FLOOD OF CONTRACT CLAIMS? 329
G. SUMMARY 330
III. THE SUBSTANTIVE EFFECT OF UMBRELLA CLAUSES 330
A. UMBRELLA CLAUSES AND APPLICABLE LAW 331
B. CONTINGENCIES AND OPPORTUNISTIC BEHAVIOUR 332
C. REGULATION AND TERMINATION OFINVESTOR-STATE CONTRACTS 336
(1) THE STATE S POWER TO INTERFERE WITH INVESTOR-STATE
CONTRACTS UNDER CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW 337
(2) THE STATE S POWER TO INTERFERE WITH PUBLIC CONTRACTS UNDER
DOMESTIC LAWS 338
D. CONTRACT REGULATION, CONTRACT TERMINATION, AND OPPORTUNISTIC
BEHAVIOUR 340
IV. CONCLUSION 342
11. TRANSFER OF FUNDS: THE INTERACTION BETWEEN THE IMF ARTICLES OF
AGREEMENT AND MODERN INVESTMENT TREATIES: A COMPARATIVE LAW PERSPECTIVE
345
I. INTRODUCTION 345
XX
IMAGE 10
CONTENTS
II. THE EVOLUTION OF CAPITAL TRANSFER LIBERALIZATION AND RELEVANCE OF
LEGAL REGIMES IN INTERPRETATION 348
A. TRANSFER OF FUNDS UNDER THE IMF ARTICLES OF AGREEMENT 348
B. EXCHANGE RESTRICTIONS UNDER GATT/GATS 351
C. CAPITAL TRANSFER UNDER THE OECD CODES OF LIBERAL ISATION 352 D.
CAPITAL TRANSFER UNDER THE LISBON TREATY 353
III. CONTIICR BETWEEN CAPITAL TRANSFER OBLIGATIONS UNDER INVESTMENT
TREATIES AND THE RIGHT TO IMPOSE RESTRICTIONS UNDER THE FUND AGREEMENT
355
A. AN OVERVIEW OF CAPITAL TRANSFERS UNDER INVESTMENT TREATIES 355 B.
CONFLICT BETWEEN INVESTMENT TREATIES AND THE FUND AGREEMENT 359 C. LEX
SPECIALIS AS AN AID IN RESOLVING NORM CONFLICTS BETWEEN INVESTMENT
TREATIES AND THE FUND AGREEMENT 362
IV. COMPARATIVE FOREIGN EXCHANGE CONTROL JURISPRUDENCE:
MAINTAINED OR IMPOSED CONSISTENTLY WITH THE FUND AGREEMENT 368
V. CONCLUSION 374
III COMPARATIVE ADMINISTRATIVE AND
COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
ON SELECTED ISSUES
12. STATE RESPONSIBILITY AND COMPARATIVE STATE LIABILITY FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGISLATIVE HARM TO ECONOMIC INTERESTS 377
I. INTRODUCTION 377
II. PRINCIPLES OF REPARATION UNDER THE INTERNATIONAL LAW ON STATE
RESPONSIBILITY 379
III. BRIEF OVERVIEW OF NATIONAL SYSTEMS OF STATE LIABILITY A. FRANCE B.
UNITED KINGDOM C. GERMANY
D. UNITED STATES E. SPAIN F. ITALY G. SWITZERLAND H. AUSTRIA
IV. PRINCIPLES OF STATE LIABILITY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION A. LIABILITY
OFEU INSTITUTIONS B. LIABILITY OF STATES FOR VIOLATIONS OFEU LAW
V. LIABILITY FOR HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS
VI. CONCLUSION
382 382 385 387
391 394 395 396
397
399 399 402
405
408
XXI
IMAGE 11
CONTENTS
13. LEGITIMATE EXPECTATIONS AND INFORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE REPRESENTATIONS
413
I. INTRODUCTION 413
II. THE GEOGRAPHICAL EXPANSION OF THE DOCTRINE 415
III. LEGITIMATE EXPECTATIONS IN INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT CASES 418
IV. THE FORERUNNERS OF THE DOCTRINE 421
A. ESTOPPEL 421
B. THE VENIRE DOCTRINE 422
C. A COMPARISON OF THESE DOCTRINES 423
V. INFORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE REPRESENTATIONS 425
VI. THE REASONABLENESS OF THE EXPECTATION 426
A. THE AUTHOR OF THE INFORMAL REPRESENTATION 426
(1) IN NATIONAL SYSTEMS AND THE EUROPEAN UNION 426
(2) IN INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT CASES 427
B. THE CONTENT OF THE INFORMAL REPRESENTATION 428
(1) IN NATIONAL SYSTEMS AND THE EUROPEAN UNION 428
(2) IN INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT CASES 429
C. THE LAWFULNESS AND CORRECTNESS OF THE REPRESENTATION 429
(1) IN NATIONAL SYSTEMS AND THE EUROPEAN UNION 429
(2) IN INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT CASES 430
D. THE FORM OF THE REPRESENTATION 431
(1) IN NATIONAL SYSTEMS AND THE EUROPEAN UNION 431
(2) IN INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT CASES 434
E. THE HARDSHIP INFLICTED ON THE RECIPIENT OF THE INFORMAL
REPRESENTATION 436
(1) IN NATIONAL SYSTEMS AND THE EUROPEAN UNION 436
(2) IN INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT CASES 437
F. THE CONDUCT OF THE STATE 437
(1) IN NATIONAL SYSTEMS AND THE EUROPEAN UNION 437
(2) IN INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT CASES 438
G. THE CONDUCT OF THE PRIVATE PARTY 441
(1) IN NATIONAL SYSTEMS AND THE EUROPEAN UNION 441
(2) IN INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT CASES 441
H. THE UNFORESEEABILITY OF THE DEFEAT OF EXPECTATIONS 443
(1) IN NATIONAL SYSTEMS AND THE EUROPEAN UNION 443
(2) IN INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT CASES 444
1. THE BALANCE OFINTERESTS 444
(1) IN NATIONAL SYSTEMS AND THE EUROPEAN UNION 444
(2) IN INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT CASES 445
VII. REMEDIES 446
A. IN NATIONAL SYSTEMS AND THE EUROPEAN UNION 446
B. JN INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT CASES 447
VIII. CONCLUSION 449
XXLL
IMAGE 12
CONTENTS
14. REVOCATION AND CANCELLATION OF CONCESSIONS, OPERATING LICENCES, AND
OTHER BENEFICIAL ADMINISTRATIVE ACTS 453
I. INTRODUCTION 453
II. NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL CASE LAW AND ADMINISTRATIVE PRACTICE 455
A. REVOCATION OR CANCELLATION DUE TO A BREACH BY THE PRIVATE PARTY 456
(1) CASE LAW AND ADMINISTRATIVE PRACTICE FROM EUROPE 456
(2) CASE LAW AND ADMINISTRATIVE PRACTICE FROM THE UNITED STATES 460 (3)
SUMMARY 464
B. REVOCATION OR CANCELLATION DUE TO CHANGE OF CIRCUMSTANCES 464 (I)
CASE LAW AND ADMINISTRATIVE PRACTICE FROM EUROPE 464
(2) CASE LAW AND ADMINISTRATIVE PRACTICE FROM THE UNITED STATES 468 (3)
SUMMARY 470
III. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSION 471
15. PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS: AWARD, PERFORMANCE, AND REMEDIES 475
I. INTRODUCTION 475
II. COMPARATIVE CONTEXT 476
A. USAGE OFPPPS IN THE JURISDICTIONS 476
B. PPP PRACTICES RELEVANT FOR INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW 478
III. PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES IN THE PPP CONTEXT RELEVANT TO
INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW 479
A. TRANSPARENCY AND FAIR AND EQUITABLE TREATMENT 480
(1) EUROPEAN UNION 480
(2) UNITED STATES 481
(3) ENGLAND AND FRANCE 481
B. LEGITIMATE EXPECTATIONS 482
(1) ENGLAND 483
(2) UNITED STATES 489
(3) FRANCE 491
(4) EUROPEAN UNION 493
C. THE PRINCIPLE OF DUE PROCESS: REMEDIES 494
(1) UNITED STATES 494
(2) ENGLAND AND FRANCE 495
(3) EUROPEAN UNION 497
D. PROPORTIONALITY 497
IV. CONCLUSION 498
16. ECONOMIC EMERGENCY POWERS: A COMPARATIVE LAW PERSPECTIVE 503
I. INTRODUCTION 503
II. THE NECESSITY DEFENCE UNDER (CUSTOMARY) INTERNATIONAL LAW AND
ECONOMIC EMERGENCY SITUATIONS 505
A. HISTORICAL APPRAISAL: THE NECESSITY DEFENCE IN OLDER STATE PRACTICE
505
XXLLL
IMAGE 13
CONTENTS
B. THE NECESSITY DEFENCE UNDER CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW:
ARTICLE 25 OF THE ILC ARTICLES 506
C. THE NECESSITY DEFENCE IN THE INVESTMENT ARBITRATION CASES AGAINST
ARGENTINA 508
(1) FACTS 508
(2) THE ELEMENTS OF THE NECESSITY DEFENCE IN THE CASES BROUGHT AGAINST
ARGENTINA 509
(3) CONCLUSION 513
III. STATE POWERS IN ECONOMIC EMERGENCY SITUATIONS UNDER NATIONAL
LAW: THE EXAMPLES OF THE UNITED KINGDOM, FRANCE, GERMANY, AND THE UNITED
STATES 513
A. UNITED KINGDOM 515
(1) OVERVIEW 515
(2) THE CIVIL CONTINGENCIES ACT 2004 515
(3) APPRECIATION 517
B. FRANCE 518
(1) OVERVIEW 518
(2) ARTICLE 16OF THE 1958 CONSTITUTION 519
(3) THE 1955 LAW 521
(4) THE DECISIONS OF THE CONSEIL D ETAT ON THE 2005 ETAT D URGENCE 522
(5) APPRECIATION 523
C. GERMANY 524
(1) OVERVIEW 524
(2) THE 1968 LAW ON SECURING THE ECONOMY 525
(3) THE 1990LAWON SECURING FOOD SUPPLY (ERNDHRUNGSVORSORGEGESETZ) 525
(4) JUDICIAL REVIEW 526
(5) COMPENSATION 526
(6) ARTICLE 15OF THE GERMAN BASIC LAW (GG) 528
(7) APPRECIATION 528
D. UNITED STATES 529
(1) OVERVIEW 529
(2) THE US EMERGENCY REGIME-THE NEA AND THE IEEPA 530 (3) LIMITATIONS OF
CONSTITUTIONAL GUARANTEES IN TIMES OF (ECONOMIC) EMERGENCIES: THE
CONTRACTS CLAUSE 533
(4) COMPENSATION 536
(5) APPRECIATION 537
IV. CONCLUSION 538
17. PROPERTY PROTECTION AND PROTECTION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE 541
1. INTRODUCTION 541
II. THE EMERGENCE OF THE CONFLICT BETWEEN CULTURAL PROPERTY PROTECTION
AND INVESTMENT-RELATED PROPERTY RIGHTS IN INTERNATIONAL PRACTICE 543
XXIV
IMAGE 14
CONTENTS
III. RELEVANT INTERNATIONAL TREATIES CONCERNING THE SAFEGUARDING OF
CULTURAL HERITAGE AND THEIR POTENTIAL TO AFFECT PRINCIPLES
OFINTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW 549
IV. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS AND INFLUENCE OFINTERNATIONAL LAW ON DOMESTIC
RULES 555
V. GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF LAW REGULATING THE INTERACTION BETWEEN THE
SAFEGUARDING OF CULTURAL HERITAGE AND INVESTMENT-RELATED PRIVATE RIGHTS
562
VI. CONCLUSION 567
18. TAXATION AND INVESTMENT: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW LIMITATIONS ON TAX
LEGISLATION IN CONTEXT 569
I. INTRODUCTION 569
II. SCOPE OF APPLICATION OFINVESTMENT TREATIES TO MATTERS OF TAXATION
571 A. GENERAL TREATMENT OF TAX MATTERS IN INVESTMENT TREATIES 571 B.
SUBSTANTIVE TREATMENT STANDARDS AND THEIR TAX RELEVANCE 573
III. LIMITATIONS OF THE TAX LEGISLATOR WITH REGARD TO INVESTOR
RIGHTS-COMPARATIVE PUBLIC LAW ANALYSIS AND RELEVANT CASE LAW A.
SELECTION CRITERIA
B. DIFFERENTIAL TAX TREATMENT C. CHANGES IN TAX LEGISLATION (1)
RETROACTIVE AND FUTURE CHANGES FROM A CONSTITUTIONAL LAW POINT OF VIEW
(2) THE SIGNIFICANCE OF PLANNING STABILITY FOR THE LEGITIMATE
EXPECTATIONS OF THE FOREIGN INVESTOR (3) THE CONCEPT OF TAX
STABILIZATION CLAUSES (4) SUMMARY D. THE PROTECTION OF PROPERTY AGAINST
EXCESSIVE TAXATION
(1) CHALLENGES TO THE ABSOLUTE AMOUNT OF TAXES LEVIED IN SELECTED
NATIONAL JURISDICTIONS (2) PROPERTY PROTECTION AGAINST INDIRECT
EXPROPRIATION THROUGH TAX MEASURES IN INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW E.
RESTRAINTS ON DOMESTIC TAX LEGISLATION BY EU LAW
IV. CONCLUSION
19. COMPARATIVE TAXATION PROCEDURE AND TAX ENFORCEMENT
I. INTRODUCTION
II. RELEVANT PRINCIPLES OFINVESTMENT LAW A. FAIR AND EQUITABLE TREATMENT
B. EXPROPRIATION C. UMBRELLA CLAUSES AND STABILIZATION AGREEMENTS
III. TAX PROCEDURE IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE
XXV
574 574 575 580
580
585 586 588
589
589
592 594
596
599 599
600 600 603 606
607
IMAGE 15
CONTENTS
A. SUBSTANCE AND PROCEDURE B. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS AND WITHHOLDING C.
ABILITY TO RELY ON TAX ADMINISTRATION GUIDANCE D. AUDITING AND TAXPAYER
RIGHTS E. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
F. JUDICIAL REVIEW G. COLLECTION AND ASSET FREEZES H. ASSET SALES
IV. CONCLUSION
608 609 611 613
615 616 619 621
624
IV DISPUTE SETTLEMENT, ARBITRAL
PROCEDURE, AND REMEDIES
20. INVESTMENT TREATY ARBITRATION, PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS, AND THE RULE OF
LAW 627
I. INTRODUCTION 627
II. CONTEXT 630
A. THE UNIQUENESS OFINVESTMENT TREATY ARBITRATION 630
B. A CAUTION ON DOMESTIC ANALOGIES 632
III. THE ISSUE OF THE RULE OF LAW 634
A. THE EMPHASIS ON PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS 634
B. THE ROLE OFJUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE 639
IV. CONCERNS ABOUT INDEPENDENCE IN INVESTMENT TREATY ARBITRATION 643 A.
THE INAPPROPRIATE INFLUENCE OF APPOINTING AUTHORITIES 643
B. THE INAPPROPRIATE INFLUENCE OF PRIVATE PARTIES 648
C. ACTUAL VERSUS PERCEIVED BIAS 65I
D. EMPIRICAL STUDY OF ACTUAL BIAS 653
E. EXISTING PROTECTIONS WITHIN THE SYSTEM 654
V. CONCLUSION 656
21. PROCEDURE IN INVESTMENT TREATY ARBITRATION AND
THE RELEVANCE OF COMPARATIVE PUBLIC LAW
I. INTRODUCTION
659
659
II. PROCEDURE IN INTERNATIONAL ADJUDICATION 662
A. SOURCES OF PROCEDURE 662
(1) STATUTES AND RULES OF PROCEDURE 662
(2) CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW AND INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL AND ARBITRAL
PRACTICE 664
(3) GENERAL PRINCIPLES OFLAW 665
(4) INHERENT POWERS 666
B. PROCEDURE IN INVESTMENT TREATY ARBITRATION 669
III. ASPECTS OF PROCEDURE IN THE REVIEW OF SOVEREIGN ACTION AT THE
NATIONAL LEVEL 672
XXVI
IMAGE 16
CONTENTS
A. JUDICIAL REVIEW AND MERITS REVIEW 672
B. JUDICIAL REVIEW IN COMPARATIVE PUBLIC LAW 673
(1) UNITED KINGDOM 673
(2) AUSTRALIA 675
(3) UNITED STATES 677
(4) GERMANY 679
(5) FRANCE 680
IV. THE APPLICATION OF DOMESTIC SOLUTIONS IN INVESTMENT TREATY
ARBITRATION 681
A. POWERS RELATED TO THE GATHERING OF EVIDENCE 682
B. APPLICATION OF AN INQUISITORIAL PROCEDURE 684
C. ACCESS TO THE COURT FOR NON-DISPUTING PARTIES 684
D. AVAILABILITY OF DIFFERENT REMEDIES 686
V. CONCLUSION 688
22. THE NEED FOR PUBLIC LAW STANDARDS OF REVIEW IN INVESTOR-STATE
ARBITRATIONS 689
I. INTRODUCTION 689
II. INVESTMENT ARBITRATION AS PUBLIC LAW 691
III. THE ICSID APPROACH, A GROWING LEGITIMACY GAP, AND THE
NEED FOR NEW STANDARDS OF REVIEW IN INVESTMENT ARBITRATION 695
IV. A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF STANDARDS OF REVIEW IN
INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC LAW ADJUDICATION 699
A. THE WTO S LEAST RESTRICTIVE ALTERNATIVE TEST 699
B. THE MARGIN OFAPPRECIATION 701
(1) GENERAL JUSTIFICATIONS 701
(2) THE MARGIN OF APPRECIATION IN THE ECTHR S JURISPRUDENCE ON THE
PROTECTION OF PROPERTY UNDER ARTICLE 1OF PROTOCOL 1 703 (3) USE OF THE
MARGIN OF APPRECIATION BY OTHER JUDICIAL BODIES 705 C. GOOD FAITH REVIEW
705
V. TOWARDS A CONSISTENT AND THEORETICALLY GROUNDED INTERNATIONAL
APPROACH TO STANDARDS OF REVIEW IN PUBLIC LAW ADJUDICATION 707 A.
MELDING (ORCONFUSING?) THE STANDARDS: RECENT RCSRD JURISPRUDENCE 707 B.
STANDARDS OF REVIEW AND THE INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT OFJUDICIAL
DECISION-MAKING 711
C. PATHS FORWARD: THE MARGIN OFAPPRECIATION AND PROPORTIONALITY ANALYSIS
715
VI. CONCLUSION 719
23. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY REMEDIES IN INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW AND
NATIONAL STATE LIABILITY: A FUNCTIONAL AND COMPARATIVE VIEW
I. INTRODUCTION
721
721
XXVII
IMAGE 17
CONTENTS
II. TERMINOLOGY 723
III. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY REMEDIES IN MUNICIPAL STATE LIABILITY LAW 725
IV REMEDIES IN INTERNATIONAL LAW AND INVESTMENT LAW 730
A. REMEDIES IN PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW 731
B. REMEDIES IN INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW 733
(1) REMEDIES USED IN INVESTMENT LAW 734
(2) EXHAUSTION OFLOCAL REMEDIES AND DENIAL OF JUSTICE 735
(3) WAITING PERIODS, IOCAL-COURRS-HRSR REQUIREMENTS, AND
FORK-IN-THE-ROAD PROVISIONS 739
V THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR A FUNCTIONAL COMPARISON OF PRIMARY AND
SECONDARY REMEDIES 744
VI. FUNCTIONAL COMPARISON OF REMEDIES IN NATIONAL LAW AND INVESTMENT LAW
746
A. ARGUMENTS FOR AND AGAINST PRIMARY REMEDIES IN INVESTMENT ARBITRATION
746
B. HOW TO REINTRODUCE PRIMARY REMEDIES IN INVESTMENT LAW 749
VII. CONCLUSION AND OUTLOOK 752
24. COMPARATIVE COMPENSATION FOR EXPROPRIATION 755
I. INTRODUCTION 755
II. COMPENSATION FOR EXPROPRIATION IN INTERNATIONAL LAW 757
A. REPARATION 757
B. COMPENSATION FOR EXPROPRIATION IN INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW 759
(1) CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW 759
(2) INVESTMENT TREATIES 762
(3) VALUATION METHODS AND KEY DRIVERS OF VALUE FOR DETERMINING THE
AMOUNT OF COMPENSATION 763
(4) CASE STUDIES 766
C. MORAL DAMAGES FOR EXPROPRIATION 771
III. COMPENSATION FOR EXPROPRIATION IN INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW
773
A. APPLICABILITY OF HUMAN RIGHTS JURISPRUDENCE IN INTERNATIONAL
INVESTMENT LAW 773
B. EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS 774
C. INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS 776
IV. COMPENSATION FOR EXPROPRIATION IN SELECTED DOMESTIC LEGAL SYSTEMS
778
A. COMPARATIVE DOMESTIC LAW AS ASOURCE OF LAW 778
B. SELECTED DOMESTIC LEGAL SYSTEMS 779
(1) UNITED STATES TAKINGS DOCTRINE AND COMPENSATION 779
(2) GERMANY 780
(3) FRANCE 782
V CONCLUSION 784
XXVIII
IMAGE 18
CONTENTS
25. TRANSPARENCY AND REPRESENTATION OF THE PUBLIC INTEREST IN INVESTMENT
TREATY ARBITRATION 787
1. INTRODUCTION 787
II. HEADING FOR A PITCHED BATTLE ? THE DEBATE ABOUT TRANSPARENCY AND
INCLUSIVENESS IN INVESTMENT ARBITRATION 789
A. THE ORTHODOX APPROACH 789
B. MODERATE ORTHODOXY: ICSID 790
C. CHALLENGES TO THE ORTHODOX VIEW 791
D. MEETING THE CHALLENGE 792
(1) ICSID AND NAFTA 792
(2) OTHER FRAMEWORKS 794
III. TRANSPARENCY AND PUBLIC INTEREST REPRESENTATION IN SELECTED
DOMESTIC LEGAL SYSTEMS 795
A. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS 795
B. THE UNITED STATES 797
(1) PROCEDURAL TRANSPARENCY (2) REPRESENTATION OF PUBLIC INTERESTS C.
THE UNITED KINGDOM (1) PROCEDURAL TRANSPARENCY
(2) REPRESENTATION OF PUBLIC INTERESTS D. GERMANY (1) PROCEDURAL
TRANSPARENCY (2) REPRESENTATION OF PUBLIC INTERESTS E. FRANCE
(1) PROCEDURAL TRANSPARENCY (2) REPRESENTATION OF PUBLIC INTERESTS
798 798 801 801 802
803 804 805 807 807 808
F. GREECE 810
(1) PROCEDURAL TRANSPARENCY 810
(2) REPRESENTATION OF PUBLIC INTERESTS 811
IV. THE POTENTIAL IMPACT OF A DOMESTIC ANALOGY ON INTERNATIONAL
INVESTMENT LAW 813
A. ASSESSING DOMESTIC LEGAL SYSTEMS B. IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL
INVESTMENT LAW
V. CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
813 814
816
INDEX 817
XXIX
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author2 | Schill, Stephan W. 1976- |
| author2_role | edt |
| author2_variant | s w s sw sws |
| author_GND | (DE-588)139292497 |
| author_facet | Schill, Stephan W. 1976- |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV036860741 |
| classification_rvk | PR 2353 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)699546415 (DE-599)BVBBV036860741 |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| edition | 1. publ. |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01722nam a2200409 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV036860741</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20150128 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">101209s2010 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780199589104</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-19-958910-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)699546415</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV036860741</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-11</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PR 2353</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139576:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">International investment law and comparative public law</subfield><subfield code="c">ed. by Stephan W. Schill</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1. publ.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Oxford Univ. Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LXXXIII, 836 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Auslandsinvestition</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4003772-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Innerstaatliches Recht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4161814-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsvergleich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115712-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Internationales Recht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4027447-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4143413-4</subfield><subfield code="a">Aufsatzsammlung</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Auslandsinvestition</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4003772-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Internationales Recht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4027447-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Innerstaatliches Recht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4161814-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Rechtsvergleich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115712-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schill, Stephan W.</subfield><subfield code="d">1976-</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)139292497</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">SWB Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=020776505&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-020776505</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)4143413-4 Aufsatzsammlung gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Aufsatzsammlung |
| id | DE-604.BV036860741 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T22:49:36Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780199589104 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-020776505 |
| oclc_num | 699546415 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-29 DE-12 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-11 DE-M382 DE-703 DE-739 |
| owner_facet | DE-29 DE-12 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-11 DE-M382 DE-703 DE-739 |
| physical | LXXXIII, 836 S. |
| publishDate | 2010 |
| publishDateSearch | 2010 |
| publishDateSort | 2010 |
| publisher | Oxford Univ. Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | International investment law and comparative public law ed. by Stephan W. Schill 1. publ. Oxford [u.a.] Oxford Univ. Press 2010 LXXXIII, 836 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Auslandsinvestition (DE-588)4003772-1 gnd rswk-swf Innerstaatliches Recht (DE-588)4161814-2 gnd rswk-swf Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd rswk-swf Internationales Recht (DE-588)4027447-0 gnd rswk-swf (DE-588)4143413-4 Aufsatzsammlung gnd-content Auslandsinvestition (DE-588)4003772-1 s Internationales Recht (DE-588)4027447-0 s Innerstaatliches Recht (DE-588)4161814-2 s Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 s DE-604 Schill, Stephan W. 1976- (DE-588)139292497 edt SWB Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=020776505&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | International investment law and comparative public law Auslandsinvestition (DE-588)4003772-1 gnd Innerstaatliches Recht (DE-588)4161814-2 gnd Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd Internationales Recht (DE-588)4027447-0 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4003772-1 (DE-588)4161814-2 (DE-588)4115712-6 (DE-588)4027447-0 (DE-588)4143413-4 |
| title | International investment law and comparative public law |
| title_auth | International investment law and comparative public law |
| title_exact_search | International investment law and comparative public law |
| title_full | International investment law and comparative public law ed. by Stephan W. Schill |
| title_fullStr | International investment law and comparative public law ed. by Stephan W. Schill |
| title_full_unstemmed | International investment law and comparative public law ed. by Stephan W. Schill |
| title_short | International investment law and comparative public law |
| title_sort | international investment law and comparative public law |
| topic | Auslandsinvestition (DE-588)4003772-1 gnd Innerstaatliches Recht (DE-588)4161814-2 gnd Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd Internationales Recht (DE-588)4027447-0 gnd |
| topic_facet | Auslandsinvestition Innerstaatliches Recht Rechtsvergleich Internationales Recht Aufsatzsammlung |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=020776505&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT schillstephanw internationalinvestmentlawandcomparativepubliclaw |