The origins of reasonable doubt: theological roots of the criminal trial
"To be convicted of a crime in the United States. a person must be proven guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt." But what is reasonable doubt? Even sophisticated legal experts find this fundamental doctrine difficult to explain. In this accessible book, James Q. Whitman digs deep into th...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
New Haven [u.a.]
Yale Univ. Press
2008
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Zusammenfassung: | "To be convicted of a crime in the United States. a person must be proven guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt." But what is reasonable doubt? Even sophisticated legal experts find this fundamental doctrine difficult to explain. In this accessible book, James Q. Whitman digs deep into the history of the law and discovers that we have lost sight of the original purpose of "reasonable doubt." It was not originally a legal rule at all, he shows, but a theological one." "The rule as we understand it today is intended to protect the accused. But Whitman traces its history back through centuries of Christian theology and common-law history to reveal that the original concern was to protect the souls of jurors. In Christian tradition, a person who experienced doubt yet convicted an innocent defendant was guilty of a mortal sin. Jurors fearful for their own souls were reassured that they were safe, as long as their doubts were not "reasonable." Today, the old rule of reasonable doubt survives, but it has been turned to different purposes. The result is confusion for jurors, and a serious moral challenge for our system of justice."--BOOK JACKET. |
Beschreibung: | Includes bibliographical references and index |
Beschreibung: | IX, 276 S. Ill. |
ISBN: | 9780300116007 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV036051920 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20150625 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 100225s2008 xxua||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 9780300116007 |9 978-0-300-11600-7 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)154689010 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV036051920 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
044 | |a xxu |c US | ||
049 | |a DE-19 |a DE-B220 | ||
050 | 0 | |a KJC9601 | |
082 | 0 | |a 345.4/06 |2 22 | |
100 | 1 | |a Whitman, James Q. |d 1957- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)137070683 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a The origins of reasonable doubt |b theological roots of the criminal trial |c James Q. Whitman |
264 | 1 | |a New Haven [u.a.] |b Yale Univ. Press |c 2008 | |
300 | |a IX, 276 S. |b Ill. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index | ||
520 | 1 | |a "To be convicted of a crime in the United States. a person must be proven guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt." But what is reasonable doubt? Even sophisticated legal experts find this fundamental doctrine difficult to explain. In this accessible book, James Q. Whitman digs deep into the history of the law and discovers that we have lost sight of the original purpose of "reasonable doubt." It was not originally a legal rule at all, he shows, but a theological one." "The rule as we understand it today is intended to protect the accused. But Whitman traces its history back through centuries of Christian theology and common-law history to reveal that the original concern was to protect the souls of jurors. In Christian tradition, a person who experienced doubt yet convicted an innocent defendant was guilty of a mortal sin. Jurors fearful for their own souls were reassured that they were safe, as long as their doubts were not "reasonable." Today, the old rule of reasonable doubt survives, but it has been turned to different purposes. The result is confusion for jurors, and a serious moral challenge for our system of justice."--BOOK JACKET. | |
650 | 7 | |a Bewijsrecht |2 gtt | |
650 | 7 | |a Ethische aspecten |2 gtt | |
650 | 7 | |a In dubio pro reo |2 swd | |
650 | 7 | |a Recht |2 swd | |
650 | 7 | |a Strafprocesrecht |2 gtt | |
650 | 7 | |a Strafprocessen |2 gtt | |
650 | 7 | |a Strafverfahren |2 swd | |
650 | 7 | |a Theologie |2 swd | |
650 | 4 | |a Ethik | |
650 | 4 | |a Geschichte | |
650 | 4 | |a Burden of proof |x Moral and ethical aspects |z Europe |x History | |
650 | 4 | |a Evidence, Criminal |z Europe |x History | |
650 | 4 | |a Judgments, Criminal |z Europe |x History | |
650 | 4 | |a Religion and law |z Europe |x History | |
651 | 7 | |a Europa (geografie) |2 gtt | |
651 | 4 | |a Europa | |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m LoC Fremddatenuebernahme |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=018943577&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-018943577 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804141090034417664 |
---|---|
adam_text | THE ORIGINS OF REASONABLE DOUBT / WHITMAN, JAMES Q. : C2007
TABLE OF CONTENTS / INHALTSVERZEICHNIS OF FACTUAL PROOF AND MORAL
COMFORT THE CHRISTIAN JUDGE AND THE TAINT OF BLOOD : THE THEOLOGY OF
KILLING IN WAR AND LAW THE DECLINE OF THE JUDICIAL ORDEAL : FROM GOD AS
WITNESS TO MAN AS WITNESS SALVATION FOR THE JUDGE, DAMNATION FOR THE
WITNESSES : THE CONTINENT SALVATION FOR THE JUDGE, DAMNATION FOR THE
JURY : ENGLAND THE CRISES OF THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY THE EIGHTEENTH
CENTURY : THE RULE EMERGES. DIESES SCHRIFTSTUECK WURDE MASCHINELL
ERZEUGT.
|
any_adam_object | 1 |
author | Whitman, James Q. 1957- |
author_GND | (DE-588)137070683 |
author_facet | Whitman, James Q. 1957- |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Whitman, James Q. 1957- |
author_variant | j q w jq jqw |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV036051920 |
callnumber-first | K - Law |
callnumber-label | KJC9601 |
callnumber-raw | KJC9601 |
callnumber-search | KJC9601 |
callnumber-sort | KJC 49601 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)154689010 (DE-599)BVBBV036051920 |
dewey-full | 345.4/06 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 345 - Criminal law |
dewey-raw | 345.4/06 |
dewey-search | 345.4/06 |
dewey-sort | 3345.4 16 |
dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02971nam a2200517zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV036051920</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20150625 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">100225s2008 xxua||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780300116007</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-300-11600-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)154689010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV036051920</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxu</subfield><subfield code="c">US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-B220</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KJC9601</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">345.4/06</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Whitman, James Q.</subfield><subfield code="d">1957-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)137070683</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The origins of reasonable doubt</subfield><subfield code="b">theological roots of the criminal trial</subfield><subfield code="c">James Q. Whitman</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">New Haven [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Yale Univ. Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">IX, 276 S.</subfield><subfield code="b">Ill.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"To be convicted of a crime in the United States. a person must be proven guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt." But what is reasonable doubt? Even sophisticated legal experts find this fundamental doctrine difficult to explain. In this accessible book, James Q. Whitman digs deep into the history of the law and discovers that we have lost sight of the original purpose of "reasonable doubt." It was not originally a legal rule at all, he shows, but a theological one." "The rule as we understand it today is intended to protect the accused. But Whitman traces its history back through centuries of Christian theology and common-law history to reveal that the original concern was to protect the souls of jurors. In Christian tradition, a person who experienced doubt yet convicted an innocent defendant was guilty of a mortal sin. Jurors fearful for their own souls were reassured that they were safe, as long as their doubts were not "reasonable." Today, the old rule of reasonable doubt survives, but it has been turned to different purposes. The result is confusion for jurors, and a serious moral challenge for our system of justice."--BOOK JACKET.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Bewijsrecht</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ethische aspecten</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">In dubio pro reo</subfield><subfield code="2">swd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Recht</subfield><subfield code="2">swd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Strafprocesrecht</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Strafprocessen</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Strafverfahren</subfield><subfield code="2">swd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Theologie</subfield><subfield code="2">swd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ethik</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Geschichte</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Burden of proof</subfield><subfield code="x">Moral and ethical aspects</subfield><subfield code="z">Europe</subfield><subfield code="x">History</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Evidence, Criminal</subfield><subfield code="z">Europe</subfield><subfield code="x">History</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judgments, Criminal</subfield><subfield code="z">Europe</subfield><subfield code="x">History</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Religion and law</subfield><subfield code="z">Europe</subfield><subfield code="x">History</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europa (geografie)</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Europa</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">LoC Fremddatenuebernahme</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=018943577&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-018943577</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | Europa (geografie) gtt Europa |
geographic_facet | Europa (geografie) Europa |
id | DE-604.BV036051920 |
illustrated | Illustrated |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T22:10:20Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9780300116007 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-018943577 |
oclc_num | 154689010 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-B220 |
owner_facet | DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-B220 |
physical | IX, 276 S. Ill. |
publishDate | 2008 |
publishDateSearch | 2008 |
publishDateSort | 2008 |
publisher | Yale Univ. Press |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Whitman, James Q. 1957- Verfasser (DE-588)137070683 aut The origins of reasonable doubt theological roots of the criminal trial James Q. Whitman New Haven [u.a.] Yale Univ. Press 2008 IX, 276 S. Ill. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Includes bibliographical references and index "To be convicted of a crime in the United States. a person must be proven guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt." But what is reasonable doubt? Even sophisticated legal experts find this fundamental doctrine difficult to explain. In this accessible book, James Q. Whitman digs deep into the history of the law and discovers that we have lost sight of the original purpose of "reasonable doubt." It was not originally a legal rule at all, he shows, but a theological one." "The rule as we understand it today is intended to protect the accused. But Whitman traces its history back through centuries of Christian theology and common-law history to reveal that the original concern was to protect the souls of jurors. In Christian tradition, a person who experienced doubt yet convicted an innocent defendant was guilty of a mortal sin. Jurors fearful for their own souls were reassured that they were safe, as long as their doubts were not "reasonable." Today, the old rule of reasonable doubt survives, but it has been turned to different purposes. The result is confusion for jurors, and a serious moral challenge for our system of justice."--BOOK JACKET. Bewijsrecht gtt Ethische aspecten gtt In dubio pro reo swd Recht swd Strafprocesrecht gtt Strafprocessen gtt Strafverfahren swd Theologie swd Ethik Geschichte Burden of proof Moral and ethical aspects Europe History Evidence, Criminal Europe History Judgments, Criminal Europe History Religion and law Europe History Europa (geografie) gtt Europa LoC Fremddatenuebernahme application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=018943577&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
spellingShingle | Whitman, James Q. 1957- The origins of reasonable doubt theological roots of the criminal trial Bewijsrecht gtt Ethische aspecten gtt In dubio pro reo swd Recht swd Strafprocesrecht gtt Strafprocessen gtt Strafverfahren swd Theologie swd Ethik Geschichte Burden of proof Moral and ethical aspects Europe History Evidence, Criminal Europe History Judgments, Criminal Europe History Religion and law Europe History |
title | The origins of reasonable doubt theological roots of the criminal trial |
title_auth | The origins of reasonable doubt theological roots of the criminal trial |
title_exact_search | The origins of reasonable doubt theological roots of the criminal trial |
title_full | The origins of reasonable doubt theological roots of the criminal trial James Q. Whitman |
title_fullStr | The origins of reasonable doubt theological roots of the criminal trial James Q. Whitman |
title_full_unstemmed | The origins of reasonable doubt theological roots of the criminal trial James Q. Whitman |
title_short | The origins of reasonable doubt |
title_sort | the origins of reasonable doubt theological roots of the criminal trial |
title_sub | theological roots of the criminal trial |
topic | Bewijsrecht gtt Ethische aspecten gtt In dubio pro reo swd Recht swd Strafprocesrecht gtt Strafprocessen gtt Strafverfahren swd Theologie swd Ethik Geschichte Burden of proof Moral and ethical aspects Europe History Evidence, Criminal Europe History Judgments, Criminal Europe History Religion and law Europe History |
topic_facet | Bewijsrecht Ethische aspecten In dubio pro reo Recht Strafprocesrecht Strafprocessen Strafverfahren Theologie Ethik Geschichte Burden of proof Moral and ethical aspects Europe History Evidence, Criminal Europe History Judgments, Criminal Europe History Religion and law Europe History Europa (geografie) Europa |
url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=018943577&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
work_keys_str_mv | AT whitmanjamesq theoriginsofreasonabledoubttheologicalrootsofthecriminaltrial |