General international law before human rights courts: assessing the specialty claims of international human rights law
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Abschlussarbeit Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Antwerp [u.a.]
Intersentia
2010
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | XXVI, 625 S. |
| ISBN: | 9789050959582 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV036045925 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20101105 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 100223s2010 m||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9789050959582 |9 978-90-5095-958-2 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)466359513 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV036045925 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-19 |a DE-12 |a DE-739 |a DE-11 |a DE-703 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a K3240 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 341.48 |2 22 | |
| 084 | |a PR 2213 |0 (DE-625)139532: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Vanneste, Frédéric |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a General international law before human rights courts |b assessing the specialty claims of international human rights law |c Frédéric Vanneste |
| 264 | 1 | |a Antwerp [u.a.] |b Intersentia |c 2010 | |
| 300 | |a XXVI, 625 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 502 | |a Teilw. zugl.: Leuven, Univ., Diss. , 2009 | ||
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte |0 (DE-588)1003803-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Interamerikanischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte |0 (DE-588)221724-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 630 | 0 | 7 | |a Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties |f 1969 Mai 23 |0 (DE-588)4307841-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 7 | |a Europese Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Inter-American Court of Human Rights |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Internationaal recht |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Mensenrechten |2 gtt | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Menschenrecht | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Human rights | |
| 650 | 4 | |a International courts | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Treaties |x Interpretation and construction | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Völkerrecht |0 (DE-588)4063693-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Menschenrecht |0 (DE-588)4074725-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4113937-9 |a Hochschulschrift |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte |0 (DE-588)1003803-6 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Interamerikanischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte |0 (DE-588)221724-7 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Menschenrecht |0 (DE-588)4074725-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Völkerrecht |0 (DE-588)4063693-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties |f 1969 Mai 23 |0 (DE-588)4307841-2 |D u |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m GBV Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=018937692&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |f 0904 |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-018937692 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1805087666108104704 |
|---|---|
| adam_text |
GENERAL INTERNATIONAL LAW BEFORE HUMAN RIGHTS COURTS ASSESSING THE
SPECIALTY CLAIMS OF INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW FREDERIC VANNESTE
INTERSENTIA ANTWERP - OXFORD - PORTLAND TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD VII
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS XI LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS XIII PARTI INTRODUCTION CHAPTER
I BACKGROUND: FRAGMENTATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND "HUMAN RIGHTISM" 5
I. FRAGMENTATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 5 II. DOES INTERNATIONAL HUMAN
RIGHTS LAW CONTRIBUTE TO THE FRAGMENTATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW BY
EMPHASIZING ITS "SPECIAL" CHARACTER? 7 1. ACADEMIC INTEREST FOR THE
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW AND GENERAL
INTERNATIONAL LAW 7 2. "SPECIAL" CHARACTER OF HUMAN RIGHTS LAW: LEADING
TO "AUTONOMY", "MODERATE EVOLUTION" OR "HUMAN RIGHTISM"? 11 3.
AMBIVALENT POSITION OF HUMAN RIGHTS COURTS 15 CHAPTER II RESEARCH
ASSUMPTION 19 I. "INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW" 19 1. USEFUL TERM OF
ART REFERRING TO A PARTICULAR SUBSYSTEM OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 19 2. FOCUS
ON ACHR AND ECHR AND THE CORRESPONDING SUBSYSTEMS . 22 II. "GENERAL
INTERNATIONAL LAW" 23 1. USEFUL TERM OF ART WITH A NORMATIVE AND
SUBSTANTIAL ASPECT 24 A. "INTERNATIONAL LAW" REFERS TO THE NORMATIVE
ASPECT OF GENERAL NORMS 24 B. "GENERAL" REFERS TO THE CONTENT OF THE
INTERNATIONAL LAW NORMS 29 2. MISCONCEPTIONS 31 III. "RELATIONSHIP"
BETWEEN "SPECIAL" AND "GENERAL" INTERNATIONAL LAW 35 1. "SPECIAL"
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN "INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW" AND "GENERAL
INTERNATIONAL LAW" 36 INTERSENTIA XV TABLE OF CONTENTS 2. TWO ACCEPTABLE
WAYS TO CONSIDER THE "SPECIALTY" OF INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW 37 A.
"SPECIALTY" IN THE SENSE OF AN ELABORATION OF GENERAL INTERNATIONAL LAW
37 B. "SPECIALTY" IN THE SENSE OF AN EXCEPTION TO GENERAL INTERNATIONAL
LAW 38 C. "SPECIALTY" MAY NOT LEAD TO HUMAN RIGHTISM 39 IV. RESEARCH
ASSUMPTION: INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS COURTS MAY DEVELOP GENERAL
INTERNATIONAL LAW BUT NOT CONTRADICT IT, UNLESS A CLEAR LEX SPECIALIS
CAN BE ESTABLISHED 40 CHAPTER III METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH 45 I. VIENNA
CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF TREATIES (VCLT): AN APPROPRIATE FRAMEWORK TO
ASSESS THE "SPECIALTY" CLAIMS 45 1. VCLT AS GENERAL INTERNATIONAL LAW ON
TREATIES 46 2. VCLT: AN APPROPRIATE TREATY TO TEST THE RESEARCH
ASSUMPTION. 49 II. SHORT SURVEY OF THE OTHER NORMS OF GENERAL
INTERNATIONAL LAW 50 PART II GENERAL INTERNATIONAL LAW ON TREATIES
BEFORE HUMAN RIGHTS COURTS: HUMAN RIGHTISM OR DEVELOPMENT OF GENERAL
LAW? CHAPTER I RECURRENT REFERENCES TO THE CONCEPT OF LAW-MAKING
TREATIES (WITH AN INDEPENDENT MONITORING ORGAN) 57 I. DOCTRINAL CONCEPT
OF "LAW-MAKING TREATIES" 58 1. SCHOLARS DEFENDING THE RELEVANCE OF THE
CONCEPT 58 2. SCHOLARS DOWNPLAYING THE RELEVANCE OF THE CONCEPT 59 3.
VIENNA CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF TREATIES 60 II. HUMAN RIGHTS COURTS
REGULARLY REFER TO THE CONCEPT OF "LAW-MAKING TREATIES" 61 1.
NON-RECIPROCITY AS A KEY FEATURE 61 A. OBJECTIVE NORMS FOR STATE PARTIES
61 B. WITH A CONSTITUTIONAL CHARACTER? 63 2. DO ALL "LAW-MAKING"
TREATIES HAVE A JUDICIAL ORGAN? 64 3. CONSEQUENCES OF THIS
CATEGORIZATION ACCORDING TO HUMAN RIGHTS COURTS 65 X V L INTERSENTIA
TABLE OF CONTENTS A. OBLIGATIONS FOR THIRD STATES? 65 B. RELEVANT FOR
THE "SPECIAL" INTERPRETATION, APPLICATION, MODIFICATION AND TERMINATION
OF HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES?. 66 III. RECURRENT REFERENCES MARK BUT DO
NOT CLARIFY THE SPECIALTY CLAIM 66 1. CONCEPT OF LAW-MAKING TREATIES
EXISTS 66 2. BUT IS IT USED TO CHALLENGE OR TO DEVELOP THE VCLT? 66
CHAPTER II ASSESSING THE "SPECIAL" APPROACH TOWARDS RESERVATIONS
(ARTICLES 19-23 VCLT) 69 I. VCLT OR THE AMBIGUITY OF THE GENERAL RULES
70 II. HUMAN RIGHTISM OR ELABORATION OF THE VCLT? 74 1. A SPECIAL
DEFINITION OF RESERVATIONS IN THE LIGHT OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS TREATY TEXT?
75 A. DISTINGUISHING INTERPRETATIVE DECLARATIONS FROM RESERVATIONS. 75
1. INTENTION OF THE STATE PARTIES IS DECISIVE 75 2. NEGATIVE TERRITORIAL
DECLARATIONS ARE (NOT NECESSARILY VALID) RESERVATIONS 76 3.
DISTINGUISHING LIMITATIONS TO THE OPTIONAL (ACCEPTANCE OF THE)
COMPETENCE OF HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANS FROM RESERVATIONS (OR NEGATIVE
TERRITORIAL LIMITATIONS): A "SPECIAL" APPROACH 79 B. EXISTING
DISTINCTIONS DEVELOP BUT DO NOT CHALLENGE THE VCLT AND GENERAL
INTERNATIONAL LAW ON TREATIES 84 2. COMPETENCE OF HUMAN RIGHTS COURTS TO
ADDRESS THE APPLICABILITY AND VALIDITY OF RESERVATIONS 86 A. "SPECIAL"
COMPETENCE OF HUMAN RIGHTS COURTS FLOWS FROM THE TEXT OF THE ECHR AND
THE ACHR 87 1. ECTHR'S COMPETENCE 87 2. IACTHR'S COMPETENCE 89 3. HUMAN
RIGHTS COURTS' BROAD MANDATE SUFFICES TO DEFEND THEIR "SPECIAL"
COMPETENCE 89 B. HUMAN RIGHTS COURTS ASSESS THE VALIDITY OF RESERVATIONS
IN LINE WITH ARTICLE 19 VCLT 91 1. HUMAN RIGHTS COURTS TAKE SIDES IN THE
DOCTRINAL DEBATE BETWEEN OPPOSABILITY AND PERMISSIBILITY 91 2. ARTICLE
57 ECHR REQUIRES SPECIFIED RESERVATIONS (ARTICLE 19(B) VCLT) 92 3.
ARTICLE 75 ACHR REQUIRES RESERVATIONS TO BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE OBJECT
AND PURPOSE OF THE TREATY (ARTICLE 19(C) VCLT) 96 INTERSENTIA XV11 TABLE
OF CONTENTS C. HUMAN RIGHTS COURTS CHALLENGE THE IMPORTANCE OF STATE
ACCEPTANCE AND STATE OBJECTIONS (ARTICLE 20 VCLT) 100 1. ECTHR'S
CAUTIOUS ASSESSMENT OF THE RELEVANCE OF STATES' OBJECTIONS AND
ACCEPTANCE 102 2. IACTHR'S CLEAR REJECTION OF THE RELEVANCE OF STATES'
OBJECTIONS AND ACCEPTANCE 103 D. NOT THE CONCLUSION THAT HUMAN RIGHTS
COURTS ARE COMPETENT, BUT THE CONCLUSION THAT STATE BEHAVIOUR IS
IRRELEVANT AMOUNTS TO HUMAN RIGHTISM 106 3. ASSESSING THE CONSEQUENCES
OF INAPPLICABLE AND INVALID RESERVATIONS: A SPECIAL APPROACH? 107 A.
ECTHR'S SEVERABILITY APPROACH: DEVELOPING THE VCLT 109 1. ORIGIN AND
JUSTIFICATION OF THE SEVERABILITY DOCTRINE. 109 2. RECENT MITIGATIONS
OF THIS DOCTRINE ILL 3. IS THE ECTHR DEVELOPING A VOLUNTARIST VARIANT OF
THE SEVERABILITY DOCTRINE? ILL B. IACTHR'S SILENCE ON THE TOPIC 112 C.
SEVERABILITY DOCTRINE REFINES THE VCLT REGIME, BUT HOW? . 113 4.
WITHDRAWAL OF RESERVATIONS 117 A. ECTHR 117 B. IACTHR 118 C. NO REAL
INDICATIONS THAT HUMAN RIGHTS COURTS CHALLENGE THE VCLT ON THIS ISSUE
119 III. CONCLUSION: HUMAN RIGHTS COURTS ESSENTIALLY DEVELOP THE VCLT
RESERVATIONS REGIME WITHOUT CONTRADICTING IT 120 CHAPTER III SPECIAL
APPLICATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES (ARTICLES 24-30 VCLT)? 123 I.
APPLICATION RATIONE TEMPORIS (ARTICLES 24 AND 28 VCLT) 123 1. VCLT 124
2. HUMAN RIGHTS COURTS REJECT THE "SPECIALTY" CLAIM 129 A. ECTHR'S
EMPHASIS ON "FACTS CONSTITUTIVE OF THE ALLEGED INTERFERENCE" 129 B.
IACTHR'S ATTEMPT NOT TO LIMIT ITS TEMPORAL JURISDICTION TO INTERFERENCES
136 3. CONCLUSION 142 II. APPLICATION RATIONE LOCI (ARTICLE 29 VCLT) 143
1. VCLT 143 2. BETWEEN THE ELABORATION OF THE TRADITIONAL APPROACH AND
HUMAN RIGHTISM 144 X V U L INTERSENTIA TABLE OF CONTENTS A. "SPECIAL"
CLAUSES IN HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES 144 B. REFERENCE TO JURISDICTION:
EXCEPTION TO THE TERRITORIAL APPROACH OF THE VCLT? 145 1. CONCEPT OF
JURISDICTION IN PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW . 147 2. HUMAN RIGHTS COURTS
DEVELOP THE CONCEPT OF JURISDICTION 149 3. CONCLUSION 164 III.
APPLICATION RATIONE PERSONAE OF HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES AND JURISDICTION
RATIONE PERSONAE OF HUMAN RIGHTS COURTS 166 1. VCLT AND OTHER RELEVANT
GENERAL RULES 166 2. HUMAN RIGHTS COURTS RELY ON A CLEAR LEX SPECIALIS
OR DEVELOP THE GENERAL RULE 168 A. APPLICATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES
RATIONE PERSONAE: LEGITIMATION VIA GENERAL INTERNATIONAL LAW 168 1.
CONFIRMING AND CLARIFYING THE GENERAL RULES ON THE ATTRIBUTION OF STATE
RESPONSIBILITY: ABOUT STATE ORGANS, PERSONS OR ENTITIES EXERCISING
ELEMENTS OF GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY, INSURRECTIONAL MOVEMENTS AND
PARAMILITARY GROUPS 169 2. ATTRIBUTION OF STATE RESPONSIBILITY IN
CONNECTION WITH THE ACT OF AN INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION: MAKING
INTERNATIONAL LAW OF COOPERATION WORK 180 3. ATTRIBUTION OF STATE
RESPONSIBILITY IN CONNECTION WITH THE ACT OF AN INDIVIDUAL (NOT A STATE
ORGAN) 193 B. JURISDICTION RATIONE PERSONAE: "SPECIAL" LEGITIMATION VIA
THE TREATY TEXTS 194 1. INDIVIDUAL COMPLAINTS: A REVOLUTION ORCHESTRATED
BY THE STATES 194 2. STATE COMPLAINTS: DEVELOPING THE CONCEPT OF
OBLIGATIONS ERGA OMNES CONTRACTANTES 7 . 201 3. CONCLUSION 203 IV.
RATIONE MATERIAE 205 1. ESTABLISHING THE MATERIAL SCOPE OF A TREATY IS
ESSENTIALLY A MATTER OF INTERPRETATION 205 2. HUMAN RIGHTS COURTS
ENDORSE THE GENERAL RULE THAT THE TREATY NORMS PREVAIL OVER DOMESTIC LAW
(ARTICLES 27 VCLT AND 46 VCLT) 207 3. CONCLUSION 209 V. HUMAN RIGHTS
COURTS MOSTLY RESPECT AND DEVELOP THE GENERAL RULES. 209 INTERSENTIA XIX
TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER IV SPECIAL APPROACH TOWARDS INTERPRETATION OF
HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES (31-33 VCLT)? 213 I. INTRODUCTION 213 1. APPROACH
213 2. PRELIMINARY REMARK: NO WATERTIGHT DISTINCTION BETWEEN
INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION 214 II. TREATY INTERPRETATION ACCORDING
TO THE VCLT 217 1. ARTICLES 31-33 VCLT: INTERPRETATION AS A
COMPREHENSIVE EXERCISE WITH VARIOUS ELEMENTS 217 2. VARIOUS SCHOOLS OF
INTERPRETATION 220 A. TEXTUAL APPROACH 221 B. SUBJECTIVE (OR
INTENTIONAL) APPROACH 222 C. TELEOLOGICAL APPROACH 224 D. INCLUSIVE OR
HOLISTIC APPROACH 225 3. CONCLUSION 226 III. HUMAN RIGHTS COURTS
EMPHASIZE "SPECIAL" AIMS OF THE INTERPRETATIVE PROCESS 227 1. AUTONOMOUS
INTERPRETATION 229 A. SPECIFIC AIM 229 1. AUTONOMOUS INTERPRETATION
SERVES TO DELIMIT THE SCOPE OF THE TREATY TERMS AND THE TREATY 232 B.
ONE-WAY AUTONOMY? 235 C. UNDERLYING METHODOLOGY 238 2. EVOLUTIVE
INTERPRETATION 243 A. SPECIFIC AIM 243 1. INTERPRETING IN THE LIGHT OF
PRESENT DAY CONDITIONS 243 2. ALLOWING INTERNATIONAL COURTS TO RECOGNIZE
NEW TREATY OBLIGATIONS 246 B. UNDERLYING METHODOLOGY 253 1. IMPORTANT
ROLE OF OBJECT AND PURPOSE 253 2. CONSENSUS AS A DECISIVE ELEMENT TO
ESTABLISH THE EVOLVING OBJECT AND PURPOSE OF THE ECHR PROVISIONS?. 263
3. EVOLVING UNDERSTANDING OF THE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL SYSTEM AS A
DECISIVE ELEMENT TO ESTABLISH THE UNDERSTANDING OF THE OBJECTIVE NATURE
OF THE ACHR PROVISIONS? 294 3. PRINCIPLE OF EFFECTIVENESS 312 A.
SPECIFIC AIM 312 B. UNDERLYING METHODOLOGY 317 4. MARGIN OF
APPRECIATION? 317 A. SPECIFIC AIM 319 INTERSENTIA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.
CLARIFYING THE DIVISION OF POWERS BETWEEN INTERNATIONAL COURTS AND
DOMESTIC STATES WHEN DIFFERENT RIGHTS NEED TO BE BALANCED 319 2. MARGIN
OF APPRECIATION THEORY: INTERPRETATION OR APPLICATION? 323 B. UNDERLYING
METHODOLOGY 327 1. CONSENSUS 327 2. IMPORTANCE OF THE RIGHT INVOLVED 328
3. NATURE OF THE RESTRICTION 329 4. ROLE OF DOMESTIC POLICY MAKER 330 C.
SUPERFLUOUS THEORY TO BE REPLACED BY A PRO PERSONA APPROACH (AS THE
IACTHR SEEMS TO SUGGEST)? 330 5. INTERIM CONCLUSION 334 IV. HOLISTIC
READING OF THE VCLT DOES NOT AMOUNT TO HUMAN RIGHTISM . 335 1.
"SPECIAL" RULES ARE COMPATIBLE WITH A "HOLISTIC" READING OF THE VCLT 336
A. AUTONOMOUS INTERPRETATION AND THE VCLT 336 B. EVOLUTIVE
INTERPRETATION AND THE VCLT 339 C. PRINCIPLE OF EFFECTIVENESS AND VCLT
342 D. MARGIN OF APPRECIATION AND VCLT 343 2. LESSONS TO BE DRAWN FROM
THE CASE LAW OF HUMAN RIGHTS COURTS 345 A. HOLISTIC READING OF VCLT 345
B. UNDERSTANDING THE LIMITS OF THE HOLISTIC APPROACH IS A DIFFICULT BUT
FEASIBLE EXERCISE 346 C. TREATIES MAY HAVE THE "SPECIAL" OBJECTIVE TO
DIVIDE RULE- MAKING POWERS BETWEEN STATES AND INTERNATIONAL COURTS .
347 CHAPTER V SPECIAL SIGNIFICANCE FOR THIRD PARTIES (ARTICLES 34-38
VCLT AND 53)? 349 I. HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES CAN BECOME BINDING ON THIRD
STATES THROUGH INTERNATIONAL CUSTOM (ARTICLE 38 VCLT) 350 II. VARIOUS
POSITIONS IN LEGAL DOCTRINE ON THE NORMATIVE WEIGHT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
TREATIES 354 1. VARIOUS "SPECIAL" APPROACHES IN LEGAL DOCTRINE 355 2.
CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW: A CONTEMPORARY VIEW 360 A. OBJECTIVE
ELEMENT: STATE PRACTICE (USUS) 363 1. ACTS CONSTITUTING STATE PRACTICE
363 2. DENSITY OF THE PRACTICE (EXTENT, UNIFORMITY, REPRESENTATIVITY)
366 INTERSENTIA XXI TABLE OF CONTENTS 3. PERSISTENT OBJECTOR THEORY 368
4. REGIONAL PRACTICE 369 B. SUBJECTIVE ELEMENT: OPINIO JURIS 369 1.
CONCEPT 369 2. PROOF OF THE EXISTENCE OF OPINIO JURIS 372 3. REGIONAL
CUSTOM ONLY DIFFERS FROM GENERAL CUSTOM WHEN IT COMES TO THE REQUIRED
LEGAL CONVICTION 375 III. HUMAN RIGHTS COURTS DO NOT REFER TO THE ECHR
OR THE ACHR AS CUSTOMARY HUMAN RIGHTS LAW 377 1. HUMAN RIGHTS COURTS
ALMOST NEVER EXPLICITLY REFER TO THE CUSTOMARY NATURE OF THE ECHR OR THE
ACHR 377 2. EXPLAINING THE LACK OF EXPLICIT RECOGNITION OF CUSTOMARY
INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW BY HUMAN RIGHTS COURTS 381 A. LACK OF
JURISDICTION 381 B. REGIONAL CUSTOMARY LAW: A DIFFICULT CONCEPT 381 C.
CONSTITUTIVE ELEMENTS OF CUSTOM ARE ALREADY USED SEPARATELY 384 D.
CONCLUSION 384 IV. ACCORDING TO HUMAN RIGHTS COURTS GENERAL PRINCIPLES
OF LAW UNDERLIE THE ECHR AND THE ACHR 385 1. ECTHR AND I ACTHR AGREE
THAT GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF HUMAN RIGHTS LAW UNDERLIE THE ECHR AND THE
ACHR 385 2. NORMATIVE SIGNIFICANCE OF GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF LAW
ACCORDING TO HUMAN RIGHTS COURTS 393 A. GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF HUMAN
RIGHTS LAW RECOGNIZED BY CIVILIZED NATIONS BEFORE THE ECTHR 393 1.
SUBSIDIARY NORMATIVE ROLE OF GENERAL PRINCIPLES IN GOLDER 394 2.
ASSESSING THE NORMATIVE ROLE OF GENERAL PRINCIPLES RELATING TO HUMAN
RIGHTS LAW IN K.-H.W. V. GERMANY . 398 3. CONCLUSION 401 B. GENERAL
PRINCIPLES OF HUMAN RIGHTS LAW RECOGNIZED BY CIVILIZED NATIONS BEFORE
THE IACTHR 403 V. CONCLUSION 405 CHAPTER VI SPECIAL STATUS FOR THE NORMS
ENSHRINED IN THE ECHR OR THE ACHR (ARTICLES 30,34-42, 53, 59 AND 64
VCLT)? 407 I. HUMAN RIGHTS TREATY PROVISIONS AS JUS COGENS (ARTICLE 53
VCLT)? 408 1. CONCEPT OF JUS COGENS 409 VY1I INTERSENTIA TABLE OF
CONTENTS A. ESTABLISHING THE EXISTENCE OF JUS COGENS 409 B. NORMATIVE
WEIGHT OF JUS COGENS 414 2. DO HUMAN RIGHTS COURTS CONSIDER THE HUMAN
RIGHTS TREATY PROVISIONS TO HAVE ACQUIRED THE STATUS OF JUS COGENS 7 419
A. RESTRICTIVE APPROACH OF THE ECTHR TOWARDS JUS COGENS 419 1. JUS
COGENS I N THE CASE LAW OF THE ECTHR 419 2. REFERRING TO A REGIONAL
PUBLIC ORDER INSTEAD OF JUS COGENS 426 B. THE EXTENSIVE APPROACH OF THE
IACTHR TOWARDS JUS COGENS. ALL 3. HUMAN RIGHTIST ATTITUDE? 436 II.
MODIFYING HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES: IMPOSSIBLE IN THE LIGHT OF THE
PEREMPTORY NATURE OF THE UNDERLYING PRINCIPLES? 438 1. REVISING A TREATY
ACCORDING TO THE VCLT 439 A. REVISION OF TREATIES 439 B. REVISION OF JUS
COGENS 445 III. APPROACH OF HUMAN RIGHTS COURTS 446 1. EXPLICIT LEX
SPECIALIS 447 2. CONSEQUENCES OF LEX SPECIALIS ACCORDING TO HUMAN RIGHTS
COURTS 450 A. SUBSEQUENT (AND PREVIOUS) TREATIES CAN ONLY REVISE THE
TREATY TEXT IF THEY ENHANCE PROTECTION 450 B. PACTUM TACITURN MAY REVISE
THE TREATY TEXT IF IT ENHANCES PROTECTION 454 3. HUMAN RIGHTISM? 457 IV.
CONCLUSION: CHOOSING BETWEEN JUS COGENS AND THE CONCEPT OF A REGIONAL
PUBLIC ORDER 458 CHAPTER VII WITHDRAWAL FROM HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES
(ARTICLE 56 VCLT) 465 I. VCLT 466 II. SPECIAL APPROACH BY HUMAN RIGHTS
COURTS? 469 HI. CONCLUSION 476 CHAPTER VIII INTERIM CONCLUSION TO PART
II 477 INTERSENTIA XX1U TABLE OF CONTENTS PART III "SPECIAL"
UNDERSTANDING OF GENERAL INTERNATIONAL LAW (OTHER THAN GENERAL
INTERNATIONAL LAW ON TREATIES)? CHAPTER I SPECIALTY CLAIM FOR VARIOUS
TOPICS OF GENERAL INTERNATIONAL LAW TREATED BY HUMAN RIGHTS COURTS 487
I. DIPLOMATIC PROTECTION 488 1. ILC DRAFT ARTICLES ON DIPLOMATIC
PROTECTION 488 2. CASE LAW OF HUMAN RIGHTS COURTS 491 II. EXHAUSTION OF
LOCAL REMEDIES 496 1. GENERALLY RECOGNIZED RULES OF INTERNATIONAL LAW
CONCERNING EXHAUSTION OF DOMESTIC REMEDIES 497 2. CASE LAW OF HUMAN
RIGHTS COURTS 500 III. STATE RESPONSIBILITY 504 1. OBLIGATIONS THAT
RESULT FROM THE COMMISSION OF AN INTERNATIONALLY WRONGFUL ACT 505 A.
DRAFT ARTICLES ON STATE RESPONSIBILITY OF STATES FOR INTERNATIONALLY
WRONGFUL ACTS 505 B. BASIC PRINCIPLES AND GUIDELINES ON THE RIGHT TO A
REMEDY AND REPARATION FOR VICTIMS OF GROSS VIOLATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL
HUMAN RIGHTS LAW AND SERIOUS VIOLATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN
LAW (BASIC PRINCIPLES AND GUIDELINES) 508 C. LEX SPECIALIS IN THE ECHR
AND THE ACHR 511 1. CASE LAW OF THE ECTHR 511 2. CASE LAW OF THE IACTHR
518 3. CONCLUSION 525 2. COUNTERMEASURES 528 A. DRAFT ARTICLES ON STATE
RESPONSIBILITY OF STATES FOR INTERNATIONALLY WRONGFUL ACTS 529 B. LEX
SPECIALIS IN THE ECHR AND THE ACHR? 530 3. SERIOUS BREACHES 532 A.
SERIOUS BREACHES OF PEREMPTORY NORMS IN THE DRAFT ARTICLES ON STATE
RESPONSIBILITY OF STATES FOR INTERNATIONALLY WRONGFUL ACTS 532 B. HUMAN
RIGHTS LAW AND SERIOUS BREACHES 533 IV. FOREIGN (ADJUDICATORY) STATE
IMMUNITY 535 1. FOREIGN STATE IMMUNITY: CURRENT STATUS UNDER GENERAL
INTERNATIONAL LAW 535 INTERSENTIA TABLE OF CONTENTS 2. SPECIAL APPROACH
TOWARDS FOREIGN STATE IMMUNITY IN INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW? 538 V.
STATE SUCCESSION (IN RESPECT OF TREATIES) 544 1. VIENNA CONVENTION ON
SUCCESSION OF STATES IN RESPECT OF TREATIES AND GENERAL INTERNATIONAL
LAW 544 2. CASE LAW OF HUMAN RIGHTS COURTS 547 CHAPTER II HUMAN RIGHTISM
OR DEVELOPMENT? 553 I. CLEAR LEX SPECIALIS IN THE TREATY TEXT 553 II.
UNWRITTEN INTERNATIONAL LAW PROVIDES AN EXCEPTION 555 III. ABSENCE OF A
LEX SPECIALIS 557 PART IV CONCLUSION CHAPTER I HARMONY, NOT AUTONOMY 563
I. RESERVATIONS 563 II. TEMPORAL JURISDICTION 564 III. JURISDICTION: AN
ESSENTIALLY TERRITORIAL NOTION 567 IV. ATTRIBUTION OF STATE
RESPONSIBILITY 569 V. INTERPRETATION 573 VI. CONCLUSION: HUMAN RIGHTS
COURTS DEVELOP GENERAL INTERNATIONAL LAW 577 CHAPTER II "SPECIALTY"
CLAIMS OF HUMAN RIGHTS LAW ARE SELDOM CONCLUSIVE TO DEPART FROM GENERAL
INTERNATIONAL LAW 581 I. LEX SPECIALIS IN TREATY TEXT 581 II. UNWRITTEN
LEX SPECIALIS 584 III. CONCLUSION: CAUTIOUS APPROACH OF HUMAN RIGHTS
COURTS 586 CHAPTER III SPECIAL STATUS OF HUMAN RIGHTS NORMS NEEDS TO BE
CLARIFIED BY GENERAL INTERNATIONAL LAW . 589 CHAPTER IV INTERNATIONAL
HUMAN RIGHTS LAW DOES NOT THREATEN THE UNITY OF GENERAL INTERNATIONAL
LAW 595 INTERSENTIA XXV TABLE OF CONTENTS BIBLIOGRAPHY 597 INDEX 623
XXVI INTERSENTIA |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Vanneste, Frédéric |
| author_facet | Vanneste, Frédéric |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Vanneste, Frédéric |
| author_variant | f v fv |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV036045925 |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | K3240 |
| callnumber-raw | K3240 |
| callnumber-search | K3240 |
| callnumber-sort | K 43240 |
| callnumber-subject | K - General Law |
| classification_rvk | PR 2213 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)466359513 (DE-599)BVBBV036045925 |
| dewey-full | 341.48 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 341 - Law of nations |
| dewey-raw | 341.48 |
| dewey-search | 341.48 |
| dewey-sort | 3341.48 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Thesis Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV036045925</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20101105</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">100223s2010 m||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789050959582</subfield><subfield code="9">978-90-5095-958-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)466359513</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV036045925</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-11</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K3240</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">341.48</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PR 2213</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139532:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vanneste, Frédéric</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">General international law before human rights courts</subfield><subfield code="b">assessing the specialty claims of international human rights law</subfield><subfield code="c">Frédéric Vanneste</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Antwerp [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Intersentia</subfield><subfield code="c">2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XXVI, 625 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Teilw. zugl.: Leuven, Univ., Diss. , 2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1003803-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Interamerikanischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)221724-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="630" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties</subfield><subfield code="f">1969 Mai 23</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4307841-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europese Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Inter-American Court of Human Rights</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Internationaal recht</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Mensenrechten</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Menschenrecht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Human rights</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">International courts</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Treaties</subfield><subfield code="x">Interpretation and construction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Völkerrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4063693-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Menschenrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4074725-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113937-9</subfield><subfield code="a">Hochschulschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1003803-6</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Interamerikanischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)221724-7</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Menschenrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4074725-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Völkerrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4063693-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties</subfield><subfield code="f">1969 Mai 23</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4307841-2</subfield><subfield code="D">u</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">GBV Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=018937692&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0904</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-018937692</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Hochschulschrift |
| id | DE-604.BV036045925 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-20T08:55:45Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9789050959582 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-018937692 |
| oclc_num | 466359513 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-12 DE-739 DE-11 DE-703 |
| owner_facet | DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-12 DE-739 DE-11 DE-703 |
| physical | XXVI, 625 S. |
| publishDate | 2010 |
| publishDateSearch | 2010 |
| publishDateSort | 2010 |
| publisher | Intersentia |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Vanneste, Frédéric Verfasser aut General international law before human rights courts assessing the specialty claims of international human rights law Frédéric Vanneste Antwerp [u.a.] Intersentia 2010 XXVI, 625 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Teilw. zugl.: Leuven, Univ., Diss. , 2009 Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (DE-588)1003803-6 gnd rswk-swf Interamerikanischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (DE-588)221724-7 gnd rswk-swf Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969 Mai 23 (DE-588)4307841-2 gnd rswk-swf Europese Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens gtt Inter-American Court of Human Rights gtt Internationaal recht gtt Mensenrechten gtt Menschenrecht Human rights International courts Treaties Interpretation and construction Völkerrecht (DE-588)4063693-8 gnd rswk-swf Menschenrecht (DE-588)4074725-6 gnd rswk-swf (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (DE-588)1003803-6 b Interamerikanischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (DE-588)221724-7 b Menschenrecht (DE-588)4074725-6 s Völkerrecht (DE-588)4063693-8 s Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969 Mai 23 (DE-588)4307841-2 u DE-604 GBV Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=018937692&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Vanneste, Frédéric General international law before human rights courts assessing the specialty claims of international human rights law Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (DE-588)1003803-6 gnd Interamerikanischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (DE-588)221724-7 gnd Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969 Mai 23 (DE-588)4307841-2 gnd Europese Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens gtt Inter-American Court of Human Rights gtt Internationaal recht gtt Mensenrechten gtt Menschenrecht Human rights International courts Treaties Interpretation and construction Völkerrecht (DE-588)4063693-8 gnd Menschenrecht (DE-588)4074725-6 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)1003803-6 (DE-588)221724-7 (DE-588)4307841-2 (DE-588)4063693-8 (DE-588)4074725-6 (DE-588)4113937-9 |
| title | General international law before human rights courts assessing the specialty claims of international human rights law |
| title_auth | General international law before human rights courts assessing the specialty claims of international human rights law |
| title_exact_search | General international law before human rights courts assessing the specialty claims of international human rights law |
| title_full | General international law before human rights courts assessing the specialty claims of international human rights law Frédéric Vanneste |
| title_fullStr | General international law before human rights courts assessing the specialty claims of international human rights law Frédéric Vanneste |
| title_full_unstemmed | General international law before human rights courts assessing the specialty claims of international human rights law Frédéric Vanneste |
| title_short | General international law before human rights courts |
| title_sort | general international law before human rights courts assessing the specialty claims of international human rights law |
| title_sub | assessing the specialty claims of international human rights law |
| topic | Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (DE-588)1003803-6 gnd Interamerikanischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (DE-588)221724-7 gnd Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969 Mai 23 (DE-588)4307841-2 gnd Europese Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens gtt Inter-American Court of Human Rights gtt Internationaal recht gtt Mensenrechten gtt Menschenrecht Human rights International courts Treaties Interpretation and construction Völkerrecht (DE-588)4063693-8 gnd Menschenrecht (DE-588)4074725-6 gnd |
| topic_facet | Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte Interamerikanischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969 Mai 23 Europese Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens Inter-American Court of Human Rights Internationaal recht Mensenrechten Menschenrecht Human rights International courts Treaties Interpretation and construction Völkerrecht Hochschulschrift |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=018937692&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT vannestefrederic generalinternationallawbeforehumanrightscourtsassessingthespecialtyclaimsofinternationalhumanrightslaw |