Verfügbarkeit: Banatsko selo

Banatsko selo: društvene i kulturne promene ; Gaj i Dubovac

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser:	Pavković, Nikola F. 1931- (VerfasserIn)
Format:	Buch
Veröffentlicht:	Novi Sad Matica Srpska 2009
Schlagworte:	Geschichte Soziokultur Gaj (Serbia) / History Dubovac (Serbia) / History Dubovac (Serbia) > History Gaj (Serbia) > History Dubovac Gaj
Online-Zugang:	Inhaltsverzeichnis Abstract
Beschreibung:	In kyrill. Schr., serb. - Zsfassung in engl. Sprache u.d.T.: The Banat village ...
Beschreibung:	636, XXXII S. Ill., Kt.
ISBN:	9788679460424

Internformat

MARC


LEADER	00000nam a2200000 c 4500
001	BV035988782
003	DE-604
005	20190329
007	t
008	100201s2009 ab\|\| \|\|\|\| 00\|\|\| srp d
020			\|a 9788679460424 \|9 978-86-7946-042-4
035			\|a (OCoLC)501401939
035			\|a (DE-599)BVBBV035988782
040			\|a DE-604 \|b ger \|e rakwb
041	0		\|a srp
049			\|a DE-12 \|a DE-Re13
050		0	\|a DR2125.G35
084			\|a 7,41 \|2 ssgn
100	1		\|a Pavković, Nikola F. \|d 1931- \|e Verfasser \|0 (DE-588)1072770431 \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Banatsko selo \|b društvene i kulturne promene ; Gaj i Dubovac \|c Nikola F. Pavković
264		1	\|a Novi Sad \|b Matica Srpska \|c 2009
300			\|a 636, XXXII S. \|b Ill., Kt.
336			\|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|b n \|2 rdamedia
338			\|b nc \|2 rdacarrier
500			\|a In kyrill. Schr., serb. - Zsfassung in engl. Sprache u.d.T.: The Banat village ...
648		7	\|a Geschichte \|2 gnd \|9 rswk-swf
650		4	\|a Geschichte
650	0	7	\|a Soziokultur \|0 (DE-588)4299677-6 \|2 gnd \|9 rswk-swf
651		4	\|a Gaj (Serbia) / History
651		4	\|a Dubovac (Serbia) / History
651		4	\|a Dubovac (Serbia) \|x History
651		4	\|a Gaj (Serbia) \|x History
651		7	\|a Dubovac \|0 (DE-588)7700190-4 \|2 gnd \|9 rswk-swf
651		7	\|a Gaj \|0 (DE-588)7699668-2 \|2 gnd \|9 rswk-swf
689	0	0	\|a Gaj \|0 (DE-588)7699668-2 \|D g
689	0	1	\|a Soziokultur \|0 (DE-588)4299677-6 \|D s
689	0	2	\|a Geschichte \|A z
689	0		\|5 DE-604
689	1	0	\|a Dubovac \|0 (DE-588)7700190-4 \|D g
689	1	1	\|a Soziokultur \|0 (DE-588)4299677-6 \|D s
689	1	2	\|a Geschichte \|A z
689	1		\|5 DE-604
856	4	2	\|m Digitalisierung BSBMuenchen \|q application/pdf \|u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=018881541&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA \|3 Inhaltsverzeichnis
856	4	2	\|m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen \|q application/pdf \|u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=018881541&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA \|3 Abstract
940	1		\|n oe
999			\|a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-018881541
942	1	1	\|c 307.09 \|e 22/bsb \|f 0903 \|g 4971
942	1	1	\|c 306.09 \|e 22/bsb \|f 0904 \|g 4971
942	1	1	\|c 307.09 \|e 22/bsb \|f 0904 \|g 4971
942	1	1	\|c 306.09 \|e 22/bsb \|f 0903 \|g 4971

Datensatz im Suchindex

_version_	1804141011913408512
adam_text	САДРЖАЈ УВОД .............................................................5 Начин рада .......................................................10 0 ИЗВОРИМА И ЛИТЕРАТУРИ .....................................12 1 ГЕОГРАФСКИ ОСВРТ ...........................................15 Клима, воде и хидротехничке прилике ................................. 15 Народна поимања о времену и временским приликама ...................17 II СТАРИНЕ .....................................................19 ДИМИТИ JE МАДАСгАРХЕОЛОШКИ ПРЕГЛЕД ГАЈА И ДУБОВЦА .......................................................19 Гај .............................................................. 19 ДУБОВАЦ ........................................................24 III ИСТОРИЈСКИ ОСВРТ НА ТУРСКИ ПЕРИОД ...................29 IV ПОЛОЖАЈ, ИМЕ И ИСТОРИЈСКИ ПОМЕНИ ГАЈА И ДУБОВЦА. . 30 1. ГАЈ ............................................................30 а) Положај .....................................................30 б) Име насеља Гај ...............................................32 в) Топоними (потеси) ...........................................33 г) Преглед историје насеља ......................................35 Гај .........................................................35 2. ДУБОВАЦ .....................................................36 а) Положај .....................................................36 б) Име ........................................................37 в) Топоними (потеси) ............................................38 г) Преглед историје насеља ......................................40 3. КОВИН ........................................................40 4. НАЗИВИ ГАЈА И ДУБОВЦА НА ГЕОГРАФСКИМ КАРТАМА .........42 5. НОВИЈА НАСЕЉА ..............................................48 а) Мало Баваниште .............................................48 б) Бели Брег ...................................................51 в) Шумарак ....................................................53 V ДРУШТВЕНЕ И ВОЈНО-ПОЛИТИЧКЕ ПРИЛИКЕ ЗА ВРЕМЕ АУСТРИЈСКЕ И АУСТРОУГАРСКЕ ВЛАСТИ (1716-1918)............54 АУСТРО-ТУРСКИ PAT 1737-1739. ГОДИНЕ И PA3BOJ НАСЕЉА ........55 БАНАТСКА BOJHA ГРАНИЦА ......................................58 631 а) Стварање Илирског (Српског) граничарског пешачког пука 1764 . до 1773. г. и стање кућа и људства у н>ему ..........................59 б) Немачки граничарски пук...................................... 60 в) Стварање Влашког батаљона, односно Влашкоилирске регименте .... 61 r) Унутрашње уређење Банатске војне границе .....................62 д) Укидање (развојачење) Банатске војне границе ....................63 ђ) Пореске обавезе села у XVIII веку ...............................64 VI СТАНОВНИШТВО ............................................69 А) ЕТНИЧКА ИМЕНА И НАЦИОНАЛНА ПРАВА ......................69 б; ДЕМОГРАФСКЕ ПРИЛИКЕ .......................................71 Gay - Гај 1764. г. ...............................................72 Nomina derer zu dem Militairstand übertretenden - Под војном управом: 72 Bei dem Cammerali verbleiben - Под грађанском управом: ..........72 Укупан списак гајачких пореских глава из 1764. године ............73 Dubovac - Дубовац 1764. г. .......................................75 Nomina derer Militaristen - Под војном управом ...................75 Nomina derer bey dem Cammerali verbleibenden - Novakovith - Под грађанском управом ..........................................75 ТРАДИЦИЈСКА ЗНАЊА О ПОРЕКЛУ НЕКИХ РОДОВА (ФАМИЛИЈА) . . 78 Српско-румунски етнички односи .................................83 Српско-немачки етнички односи ..................................85 ДОСЕЉЕНИЦИ У XX ВЕКУ........................................ 86 Досељавање Мађара ............................................93 Досељавање Чеха ...............................................95 Српско-чешки етнички односи ....................................97 Надимци као показатељи Породичног идентитета или: „ко je чији ? . 100 в) ПРЕГЛЕД И АНАЛИЗА САВРЕМЕНИХ ПОПИСА СТАНОВНИШТВА .101 Етничке и демографске промене од краја 1918. до 2002. r .............102 Попие становништва 1921. године .............................102 Попие од 15. марта 1948. године: однос према народности .........104 Становништво према попису из 1953. године ....................105 Попис становништва 1961. године .............................107 Становништво према попису 1971. године ....................... 112 Становништво према попису 1981. године ...................... 118 Пописи становништва 1991. године ............................ 120 Попис становништва 2002. године .............................121 VII ПРИВРЕДА ..................................................124 A) ЗЕМЉОРАДЊА ................................................124 Имовно стање: земљишни фонд села у XVIII и XIX веку .............124 Гај ........................................................124 Дубовац ...................................................130 Земљорадња - ратарство ........................................131 Ораће справе и начин обраде земље ............................132 Орање .................................................... 133 Сетва и биљне културе ......................................135 632 Жетва и берба .............................................. 138 Вршидба ...................................................141 Берба кукуруза .............................................. 143 Вађење шећерне репе ........................................ 145 Воћарство, виноградарство ...................................... 146 Три вредносна става о земљи и пољопривреди данас: традицијски и савремени .................................................... 146 Б) СТОЧАРСТВО .................................................. 160 Сточни фонд (XVIII-X1X век) ....................................160 Гај ........................................................160 Сточарство у XX веку ........................................... 162 Увод ......................................................162 Полуномадско сточарство ....................................162 Говедарство ................................................179 Дозивање или терање домаћих животиња .......................180 Људска мера у животињском свету ................................180 Г) САОБРАЋАЈ И ТРГОВИНА ......................................186 Саобраћај ....................................................186 Трговине мешовитом робом и месаре .............................187 Д) ДОПУНСКА ЗАНИМАЊА ......................................188 Воденице .....................................................190 Свиларство и гајење дудова ...................................... 194 Сеоски занати .................................................197 VIII НАСЕЉЕ, КУЋА И ПРИВРЕДНЕ ЗГРАДЕ .....................200 ТИП НАСЕЉА ...................................................200 Кућа .........................................................204 Кућа „дужом , материјал за градњу куће ........................208 Избор места за градњу куће .................................. 210 Новија кућа ................................................223 Привредне зграде ...........................................227 IX ТКАЊЕ И ОДЕВАЊЕ, ХИГИЈЕНА .............................230 ТКАЊЕ .........................................................230 ОДЕВАЊЕ .......................................................232 Хигијена ...................................................242 X ИСХРАНА ....................................................244 XI ДРУШТВЕНИ ЖИВОТ И УСТАНОВЕ ..........................248 А) СЕЛО KAO ДРУШТВЕНА И EKOHOMCKA ЗАЈЕДНИЦА ...........248 1. Сеоска општина у XVIII XIX веку.............................. 248 Кнез .........................................................249 Сеоски кош (амбар) .........................................251 2. Мајска скупштина Срба у Сремским Карловцима 1848. године ......252 3. Политичке општине у XX веку ................................253 633 4. Политичка општина у времену између два светска рата ............253 Председник или кнез ........................................254 Политичке странке ..........................................259 „Добровольно ватрогасно друштво ............................262 Кафане ....................................................263 5. Први светски рат .............................................263 Учешће Гајчана и Дубовчана у Првом светском рату и Октобарској револуцији у Русији -.............................265 6. Други светски рат ............................................268 Нова немачка власт ..........................................269 Масовна хапшења ..........................................271 Присилни рад за време окупације ..............................276 Приче о издајницима ........................................276 Борци из Гаја и Дубовца погинули у рату 1941. до 1945. године .....277 Места сећања и спомен обележја ..............................278 7. Сељачке радне задруге (СРЗ) и обавезни откупи пољопривредних произвола .....................................................280 Пословање у задрузи ........................................286 Дубовац ...................................................291 Друштвено пољопривредно добро (ДПД) „7. јули Гај и Земљорадничка задруга ......................................293 8. Школство, култура, штампа, спорт ..............................300 Школство ..................................................300 Посебни део ................................................303 Школа у Краљевини СХС и Краљевини Југославији.............. 306 Штампа ...................................................317 Културно-уметнички аматеризам ..............................319 Библиотека .................................................321 Спорт .....................................................321 9. Брак - породица - задруга - домаћинство ........................322 Брак ......................................................322 1. Схватања о браку .........................................325 2. Облик брака .............................................326 3. Припрема младих за брак ...................................327 Спрема, штафир, капитал ....................................327 4. Традицијски ред код женидбе (удаје) .........................328 5. Узраст за склапање брака ...................................328 6. Територијални оквири склапања брака ........................330 8. Друштвена обележја младенаца .............................333 9. Начини склапања брака ....................................334 10. Црквени, грађански и невенчани брак .......................336 11. Етнички мешовити бракови ................................338 12. Стање брачности у 2002. години ............................338 Породица, домаћинство и задруга од краја XIX до почетка XXI в ......340 Однос државе према задрузи у прошлости ......................341 Величина и структура породице ...............................343 Породица и домаћинство у Дубовцу 1880/81. године ..............359 Породица и домаћинство у Дубовцу 1913. године ................360 634 Чешка породица у Гају .........................................374 Становништво по домаћинствима и полу 1948. године............ 375 Структура домаћинстава према броју бранних парова 2006. године. . 377 Функције породице (домаћинства)................................ 378 1 Биолошко-репродуктивне функције ...........................378 2 Економске функције породице ...............................379 3. Друтвено-васпитне функције породице .......................382 4. Обредне-религијске функције (породица као обредно- религијска заједница) ........................................383 10. Сродство ..................................................384 Сроднички називи ...........................................387 Поимање сродства код младих .................................391 Родослови ..................................................397 Сроднички односи ..........................................397 Духовнно сродство ............................................398 1. Кумство .................................................398 2. Побратимство и посестримство ..............................402 3. Усвајање (лат. adoptio) .....................................403 4. Облачење ................................................403 11. Животни ток човека .........................................406 Трудноћа, рођење, детињство .................................406 Дечје игре ..................................................411 Мушке игре ................................................411 Женске игре ................................................413 Младост ................................................... 413 Испраћај у војску ...........................................416 Припреме и ток прославе .....................................420 Анализа ...................................................421 Пунолетство ................................................423 Свадба .................................................... 423 Обичајне радње и поступил пре свадбе .........................424 Венчање и свадба ...........................................431 После свадбе ...............................................436 Смрт и погребни обреди и обичаји .............................437 Увод ......................................................437 Б) СЕЛО KAO ОБРЕДНО-РЕЛИГИЈСКА ЗАЈЕДНИЦА ................459 1. Црква и верски живот .........................................459 Општи део .................................................459 Посебни део ................................................464 Свештеници у Старом Селу и Гају у временском низу од 1735. до данас (2007)................................................478 Богомољачки покрет или богомољци ...........................481 Скит Светих четрдесет мученика - Гај (Старо Село) .............. 484 2. Савремено народно православље ...............................485 I. Православно учење ........................................486 II. Српска православна митологија .............................488 III. Православни обреди ......................................489 IV. Православна етика ........................................491 635 V. Православље и народност ..................................492 VI. Православље и друштво ...................................493 3. Римокатоличка црква у Гају ....................................494 ВОЈИСЛАВ МАТИЋ .............................................497 ЦРКВЕ У ГАЈУ И ДУБОВЦУисторијски осврт и архитектура ............497 Црква Вазнесења Господњег у Гају............................... 497 Нова црква у Гају ..............................................500 Црква св. Николе у Дубовцу .....................................507 Чешка црква у Гају и окречена ....................................514 Г) СЕОСКЕ СВЕТКОВИНЕ ........................................517 Увод .........................................................517 Посебни део ..................................................518 1. Заветина, црквена слава, литија ..............................518 2. Марвена слава ...........................................523 Припреме и ток марвене славе ................................524 6. Црквена певачка друштва ..................................533 Д) ГОДИШЊИ ПРАЗНИЦИ И ОБИЧАЈИ .............................536 Увод ......................................................536 I Зимски празници и обичаји .....................................539 Рождество Христово - Божић (25. дец. / 7. јан.) ..................551 Покладни круг празника ......................................562 Празници у великом ускршњем посту ..........................567 II Пролетњи празници и обичаји.................................. 571 III Летњи празници и обичаји ....................................585 IV Јесењи празници и обичаји ....................................591 Ђ) СЛАВА ИЛИ СВЕТАЦ ..........................................593 Е) ДЕМОНСКА БИЋА У НАРОДНОМ ПРЕДАЊУ ....................594 A) Демони природе ............................................595 Б) Демони атмосферских појава.................................. 596 B) Демони људске судбине ......................................596 Г) Демони људског порекла ......................................597 Анализа казивања о вампиру ..................................599 Људи демонских особина .....................................600 Ж) УСМЕНО НАРОДНО СТВАРАЛАШТВО ..........................603 Изреке .....................................................603 Поздрави при сусрету ........................................604 Делови лирских песама ......................................605 RESUME ........................................................607 THE BANAT VILLAGE(Gaj and Dubovac) SOCIAL AND CULTURAL CHANGES .......................................................607 СКРАЋЕНИЦЕ ...................................................619 ИЗВОРИ И ЛИТЕРАТУРА ..........................................619 Извори ....................................................619 Литература .................................................620 СПИСАК КАЗИВАЧА / САВРЕМЕНИКА .............................629 636 RESUME THE BANAT VILLAGE (GAJANDDUBOVAC) SOCIAL AND CULTURAL CHANGES This book analysed two villages (Gaj, with 3,302 inhabitants and Dubovac with 1,283 inhabitants in 2002), of the municipality Kovin, Banat - a part of the Autonomous Province of Vojvodina, Republic of Serbia. Ethnically speaking, Serbs present 80 - 85 per cent of the population. In view of government - political situation, southern part of Banat was a part of Hungary at the beginning of XVI century (1526) then a part of Turkey (up to 1717), Austria, and Austria-Hungary up to 1918, and from that time onwards it belonged to Yugoslavia and Serbia. To write an ethnological monography on two or three rural settlements en¬ tails necessarily the characteristics of general and particular respectively if not only partially. In this case, through the prism of time, those general aspects refer to the history and contemporaneity; in geographical sense it refers to a wider area of Banat and to central European area; in ethnical aspect it concerns the Serbs primarily but also some other ethnic communities (Hungarians, Czechs, Romans, and Gypsies) that live in southern Banat. The time dimensions of the study spans over three centuries (as from the beginning of XVIII century to nowadays), there¬ fore this monography also bears the seal of historical ethnology as well as of social history. Ethnological and historical methods have been applied hereto not only in the sellection of scientific facts but also in presentations and interpreta¬ tions thereof. Formation and development of the studied settlements were determined by two important but quite different factors: the first is of a natural-geographical and the second of a narrow social and historical nature. Natural and geographical location of these settlements is defined by their edge position in the area: the great river Danube runs along their southern border and to the North they border with the marshes of Deliblato. Having the borders defined by such natural elements had a significant impact not only on the es- 607 tablishment and development of settlements, but also on the ways and forms of economy as cultural human responses in contact with such geographical environ¬ ment. Socio-economic peripheral character of these settlements is in the fact that they developed along the border and in contact with different cultures and civili¬ zations. Since ancient times the river Danube was a line of demarcation between the Roman and (later) Byzantium civilization on the South and so-called Barbar¬ ian world on the North, in the middle Ages between Hungary and Serbia and at modern times it was a boundary line between the Ottoman and Austrian Empire. The state, with its institutions especially its military frontier and Serbian Ortho¬ dox Church had an enormous influence on the culture of inhabitants of these set¬ tlements and on Banat as a whole. Basic forms of economy were agriculture and cattle-breeding not only in the past but nowadays as well. The continuity of life and culture of the people from these areas has been presented through material culture artefacts and then by means of written histori¬ cal and ethnographical sources from the recent past and present time. The sources from the further past are in small number but often of general nature, but there are some sources that refer to particularities such as micro-toponyms. The reason for a restricted and fragmentary dimension of historical pres¬ entation of smaller human settlements, as it is the case hereto, is twofold. First reason - it is sufficient for an ethnologic monography to review only a framework of important historical events concerning narrower socio-economic and political circumstances. As the second reason there are written historical sources. They are few in number and limited by contents and time. The sources I used are written, material, artistic and oral. When oral sources that were transformed into ethno¬ graphic records are in question, the principle οι experienced, seen and heard has been applied. The existing written records have different and uneven applicable values and authenticity in respect of the time of origin and contents thereof. The most important written sources are church register books that have been kept since 1778, the cadastral book since 1786, ecclesiastic visitations to certain par¬ ishes (1789) and other documents concerning the parish, education and religious life. Ethnic composition of the population may be followed as from XVIII cen¬ tury while modern census with reliable data for demographic movements exists since 1921. Expert and scientific perspective even to the world of smaller rural communi¬ ties is not always a guarantee that it will provide a full introspective to the nature and dynamics of such a world. Due to these reasons there are discontinuities and fragmentariness in presentations of the society and culture even for small commu¬ nities. Partiality and incompleteness are tolerated even when modern life directly observed is concerned, as life and culture are layered and more complex than the powers of a researcher from the outside to embrace and interpret them. I say a researcher from the outside even though I was born and grew up in the environ¬ ment I have been studying, and indirectly experienced certain archaic forms and 608 contents of culture specific for the people of Banat through seven - eight genera¬ tions at least and personally too from the inside , until I came of age. Personal apprehension of culture during the conscious period of childhood and growing up puts me in a position of both object and subject of the research today: as an ethnologist I study, describe and interpret the time and events when the author at the age of 8-10 danced and sang during the ceremony to stop the rain or as a singer at Christmas Eve, or as a participant of the procession and col¬ lective chanting during numerous funerals; and during the war years (1943-44) I was forced to work on the field as a tiller, sower and/or picker in the mornings, and go to secondary school in the afternoon. My later university education and professional engagement in ethnology - anthropology within the university com¬ munity (in Beograd) have significantly distanced me from and put me outside the object of the research. Being an ethnologist has defined my own point of view in relation to the social reality I derived from and helped me climb to a certain height where I would be able to study, analyse and interpret such reality. Or, as Bordieu P. used to say, by being an ethnologist I am excluded from the real game of social activities due to a simple fact that I do not have my place in the subject system any more and that I should not have it. Nevertheless, all these facts could not save me from my present personal and others future critics that this work could have been done earlier or better, and that I failed to describe and interpret in more details the things I have seen and experienced. This creates a feeling of helplessness because I am aware of the necessity of a personal touch when writ¬ ing the ethnography on social and cultural changes (with a series of points and sequences) at this part of Banat where I grew up. For me personally, the culture I study is not the map that I need to read constantly in order not to be lost as I possess knowledge peculiar to the natives , the bearers of such culture in whose name and on which behalf I try and pursue to speak. Naturally, speaking of and interpreting the cultural reality in the name of the examined subjects is peculiar not only to the insider but to ethnologist-anthro¬ pologist with a completely different background from mine. Therefore, narrower native or wider national origin of an ethnologist-anthropologist is not to his advantage when writing ethnography, scientific analysis and interpretations of the studied society and culture are concerned, regardless if it is on a local, homeland or a higher national or generally human level. Finally, there is another reason for my involvement in describing and inter¬ preting of the culture where I was born. First, by tradition, Serbian ethnologists usually study their own people, second, this legitimate tendency has been con¬ firmed by Levi-Strauss С (1988: 120) in his recommendation to his fellow coun¬ trymen and colleagues: when a man spends his life in studying rituals of distant peoples there is no reason why he should not show his due respect to the rituals of the society in which he was born and where he lives. Due to the existence of numerous ethnological-anthropological, social and psychological definitions of culture, and for the purpose of interpretation of cultur¬ al and social changes in the Banat villages set as an objective hereto, it is necessary 609 for me to at least briefly express my definition of culture. I see culture as an ideo¬ logical conceptual sphere of human activities and the basis of life, considering it as a sum of all human achievements since the creation of man and through all times and spaces. Culture is measurable in time and space. It can be considered from monistic point of view, within global framework, and from polycentric aspect - as continental, regional, national up to the small groups where mutual acquaintances and relations face to face are common, whereas constant flows of transforma¬ tions, changes and even disappearance of the forms thereof are present. On a micro plan as we have the case hereto, friendships and matrimonial connections as well as a series of local events have positive effect on spreading of culture. Migration of women or a territorial circle of marriages are of a special importance for the study of local communities. The role of a woman in creating, keeping and transferring of the essence of culture is equal to a man s share or even dominant in some segments thereof. It is well known that during the period of her adjustment to a new home a daughter-in-law is expected to learn a great deal from her mother-in-law but she also brings her cultural baggage along with her from her home land. This duality of women being at the same time the subjects and depositors of culture will be noticed occasionally in many aspects of life, ranging from the cult of the dead to domestic industry, from the way of preparation of food to memorizing family trees and creating and keeping of oral literature. All the elements I have collected during the study of the local Banat culture will bear in many aspects a brand of general and universally human. In a brief review of global historical circumstances that strongly and directly influenced the life and culture of local communities, a fundamental turning point at the end of XVII century and during the first decades of XVIII century is em¬ phasised. Namely, the result of Austrian-Ottoman wars at the end of XVII century as well as from 1716 to 1718 was the complete change of previous territorial and political situations for the former countries of southern Hungary for the following two centuries. The changes were in favour of Austria. By the Peace Decree signed in Pozarevac in 1718, Turkey ceded to Austria a part of Banat and northern Ser¬ bia up to the Western Morava river, a part of Srem and Small Vlaska. Significant changes in ethnic and religious composition occurred after a massive migration of Serbs to Austrian territories under the leadership of the Serbian Orthodox Pa¬ triarch Arsenije III Carnojevic in 1690. This new migration of Serbs to a foreign religious and ethnic environment strengthened the old Serbian communities in the countries of former Middle-Ages Hungarian Empire. A the head of spiritual as well as national leadership of Serbs was their Orthodox Mitropolija (Episcopy) which changed its name into Karlovac Mitropolija in 1713. The Vienna Court did not allow Banat to be returned to Hungarian nobil¬ ity after being taken over from Turkey, but it was considered as a separate estate of the Austrian Crown (Patrimonium Domus Austriacae) that she won on the battlefield. This was the reason why Banat had a special governmental-political 610 position. It was under direct rule of the Vienna Court regardless the fact that it had belonged to Hungary before Turkish invasions in XVI century. At the Head of the Court Administration (or Chamber) there was a rather capable governor, a dynamic General Count Mercy CF. During the following twenty years he managed to significantly turn the Banat land, which mainly con¬ sisted of marshes, into a prosperous (for that time) agricultural area, he also im¬ proved handicraft trades and manufacture. Position of the Banat peasants was of great significance to the development of rural communities in Banat, especially when their ethnical particularities are concerned. Their position now was different from their position under Hungarian feudal lords. Banat was governed directly from Vienna through the commanders of border military posts in Timisoara/Temisvar, and as from 1751 through the Land administration. The area of southern Banat was militarized: the Banat mili¬ tary frontier was created and lasted up to 1872. Peasants - soldiers of the military frontier were personally free, they worked on land and raised the cattle but upon the call from Austrian Tsar they had to fight on the fields all over Europe. At the military frontier all power was in hands of military commanders. All three aspects of culture: material social and spiritual have been incor¬ porated (as a scheme) by the studies. The area of Banat is an extremely migra¬ tory zone so that even those parts of population that present the newer layer of immigrants during XX century have been included in the analysis. Serbian im¬ migrants from the eastern Serbia and Serbs from Lika and Dalmaţia in Croatia outnumbered the others; the Czechs from the Romanian part of Banat followed in numbers. My idea was to point out the segments of traditional culture of new residents of Banat that were parts of their everyday and ritual life at least during their first immigration years. I have also had in mind that particular state of their culture which exists as knowledge and consciousness, which is memorized and orally transmitted, but also practiced in a narrower scope and contents, or has been replaced by the Banat cultural forms and behaviour. Historic dimension of the research includes mainly the period from XVII century to the beginning of XXI century. Such a time depth is stipulated by avail¬ able written historical sources. Oral sources that are a reliable foundation for describing traditional culture of rural societies have their historic aspects in the duration of one to two human lives at least. Generations of people in XX cen¬ tury experienced significant structural changes in the whole society and culture including rural communities during the period of exactly one human life. Dur¬ ing the Second World War and German Nazi invasion (1941-44) the suffering of people and destruction of their possessions were enormous. General streams of technological development and modernization in the second part of 20th century were main factors in social and cultural changes and in disappearance of many traditional forms of culture. The book structure is as follows: 11 chapters; some of the chapters are com¬ posite and consist of several smaller sections. 611 I Geographic Review - Both settlements are compact, situated on the left bank of the Danube river, Gaj is located 10 km and Dubavac is 22 km east of Kovin on the road towards Bela Crkva and the border with Romania. The climate is moderate continental with hot summers and cold windy winters. By significant land improvements at the end of 19th century and at the beginning of 20th century the former marsh land was turned into arable fertile fields. II Archaeological Findings - Archaeological review (author D, Madas). The remains of material artefacts stand as a proof that people were settled in this area during the Bronze Age. Big and beautiful ceramic pots with geometrical pat¬ terns, adorned with white lime paste were excavated here. Due to specific forms of ceramic and its impressive beauty the archaeologists named the whole époque as the Dubovac culture. III Historic Retrospection of the Turkish Period. From reliable data on the Turkish rule it is known only that the Turks destroyed Dubavac in 1697-98 because of some uprising of Serbs. Other source from 1713 states that Gaj had 22 and Dubovac had 11 households at that time. IV Position, Name and Historic Mentioning of Settlements. Dubavac is mentioned first in 1323 as a smaller military fortification on the Danube under the name of Dombo; Gaj is mentioned for the first time only at the end of 17th cen¬ tury. Both settlements have its Staro selo (old village) and its staro groblje (old cemetery) as they moved to the location where they are now due to the Danube flooding in the second half of 18lh century. The names of villages (as well as over 90% of toponyms) are Serbian and generally Slavic. V Social and Military-Political Situations during Austrian and Austri¬ an-Hungary Rules (1716-1918): the Banat military frontier, its internal structure and final abolishment in 1872; taxation of village settlements in 18th century. VI Population - Ethnic names and national religious composition have been analysed; demographic characteristics; traditional knowledge on the origin of certain immigrated families; Serbian-Romanian, Serbian-German and Serbian- Czech ethnic relations; review of modern censuses within the period from 1921 to 2002. Most important ethical mixing happened between Serbs and Romanians. Romanians are younger immigrants (dating mainly from the beginning of 19th century), they share the same Orthodox religion with Serbs who are in major¬ ity, they were economically weaker and without their national elite so that they adjusted in the Serbs ethnic corpus in 19th century. The similar situation was with several German families: they received Orthodox religion through marriages and by the time they turned into Serbs. Gypsies did not mix with Serbs through mar¬ riages but accepted their Orthodox Christianity, they have Serbian forenames and surnames, they attend school in Serbian language, and they have family patron s day the same as Serbs. In several official censuses (from 1948 to 2002) they mostly declared themselves as Serbs. VII Economy. Agriculture: property situation of peasants and the village land fund in 18th and 19th century; tools and ways of land cultivation, field crops, and statements on the value of land and agriculture today. An old agriculture 612 terminology was noted but due to the application of modern agro-technological measures nowadays this terminology has disappeared or changed. Animal hus¬ bandry: a structure of livestock in 18th and 19th century was analysed. Apart from modern cattle farms there is still a half-nomadic way of animal husbandry (espe¬ cially for the sheep) on the pastures of Delibalatska Pescara. Even today, animal husbandry includes numerous archaic characteristics of cattle breeding. A shorter chapter Human Measure in Animal World analyses the cattle breeders understanding and their relation towards kinship and incest in a bio¬ logical chain of reproduction of domestic animals. Peasants also apply their own understanding of kinship and incest to domestic animals. VIII Settlement, Household and Tehcnical Buildings - Natural environ¬ ment (material: earth, wood, reed) has a significant influence on the development of settlements and houses, while government and military authorities effect spa¬ tial formation of settlements and orthogonal system of streets. Old houses face the street by forehead while modern houses (as from the end of 1 9th century) are turned towards the street with their longer side (façade). Urban architecture and provincial Baroque style influenced the layout and decoration of rural houses only by the end of 19th century. The household plot consists of three parts: the house with a yard, barn and stables, the threshing floor with some buildings and the garden. IX Weaving, Clothes, Hygiene - Traditional ethnic clothing has been grad¬ ually replaced by ready-made clothes as from the middle of 1 9th century. Never¬ theless, weaving (with hemp and cotton) of clothes and carpets was present up to the middle of 2№ century. Cloth, towels, pillows, rugs and quilts were the main part of the bride s dowry and gifts. Saved old photographs witness mostly formal clothes, especially with newlyweds. Having analysed the terminology used for parts of clothes and fabrics thereof we noticed clearly outlined foreign lingual and cultural influences (Romania, German, and Turkish-Oriental) X Food: everyday, festal and ritual; food conservation. Names of dishes and meals indicate their Slavic foundation above all but there are also foreign influ¬ ences (mostly German and Turkish-Oriental). XI Social Life and Institutions A) Village as a Social and Economic Community: Rural community in 1 8th and 19th century; Political community in 20th century: individual and communal entities; communal property. First and Second World War: suffering of people and destruction of their property; some elements of ethnographic re-freshening or false archaisms (faux archaïsme) in the way of life and economy as means of survival. Apart from cemeteries and churches, local and communal memorial places are represented thereto by monuments and sculptures to those fallen dur¬ ing the two world wars. For the first time in Serbian ethnology the issue of compulsive collectiviza¬ tion in rural areas (1947 to 1953) has been analysed in this study. By agrarian policy of that time and especially during so-called redemption of agricultural produces, many arrests were made; terrors and land colonisations were enforced. 613 At so-called agricultural co-operatives the subsistence economy was partially introduced (instead of being paid with money the work was compensated with agricultural and industrial produces and products) Education System as from the end of 18* century up today. Elementary schools were under competence of ecclesiastical communities in the beginning, and then they fell under the protectorate of government authorities. First school libraries were established by the end of 19th century. Nowadays, libraries in rural areas have an average of 4,500 titles. Sports life developed in 1930s while theatri¬ cal amateurism appeared in the middle of 20th century. Marriage Institution, Family, Household-Marriage is by rale monogamous and patrilocal. Girls usually marry someone from their own village, but in an overall summary there is a greater number of them from the neighbouring vil¬ lages. Matrilocal marriages are rare, but have existed in the past. A son in law that comes to his wife s rural household is better known by the surname of his father-in-law rather then by his own surname. That is the reason why several dozens of families in informal local communication use one surname while they have different surnames in their official documents. In matrilocal marriages the son-in-law is obliged to respect and celebrate the local saint patron of the house where he is married to. During the Second World War none of the widows, and their ages ranged from 23 to 45, did re-marry as in their personal and general local opinion their husbands (that died as victims of Nazi terror) were considered as martyrs. According to register books of marriages from 1 8th and 1 9th century, only forename of a bride was entered, without her surname; she was always consid¬ ered as to belong to someone, therefore only full name of her father or other custodian was entered into register. In that respect, a bridegroom always kept his own identity: his forename and surname, his origin and his father s name were entered in register books. By tradition, matrimonial ceremony was always held at church in the village where the bride comes from. Size and structure of family constantly varies. By the end of 19th century the most common type was a complex family called zadruga (extended family commune) that consisted of several married couples (from 2 to 4). Vertical fam¬ ily structures exist even today as, by tradition, a married son keeps living in the house with his parents. Kinship (consanguinity or social or spiritual) and relevant terminology. Kin¬ ship is equally defined both by male and female lines. There is a nominal pro¬ hibition to marry up to fifth or seventh generation of kinship as per father s or mother s line. Nevertheless, in practice it goes even further down in the past i.e. as far as there is an awareness of the common origin. Kinship terminology is clear and precise even today. It is of Serbian and general Slavic origin and with¬ out foreign terms. There are two particular types of so-called spiritual and social kinships/relations. The first one is kumstvo or God-parenthood; it is a continual institution inhereted by male line. The Saint Patron of God-parenthood is Sv. Jovan Krstitelj (St. John the Baptist). By rule, the marriage witness at church 614 wedding must become a Godfather (kum) to the children born in that marriage. Exogamy is strictly forbidden between those related by kumstvo VGod-parent- hood. When circumstances cause that the God-parenthood cannot be maintained any longer the relation is discontinued by mutual agreement; when discontinuing of God-parenthood is concerned the stari kum (Elder Godfather) must grant his blessing. The second type of social relations is clothing - particular symbolic adoption: 40 days after his/her death the deceased s suit/dress is given to another person of the same gender and age. From that time on the clothed person rep¬ resents symbolically the deceased whose clothes he/she is wearing at some social situations and in communications. This type of relations is known only in the southern Banat and s. Serbia. Human life cycle: Birth, Childhood, Adolescence, Wedding, and Sending-off to Army. As from the middle of 20th century women give birth at hospitals. Old Serbian national and Jude-Christian names were first (as from the middle of 20th century) replaced by old personal names then nowadays the old Serbian names are given to children again as an expression of national and religious identity. Traditional customs at birth that served as magical and symbolic protection of the mother and her newborn, today have been reduced or completely vanished. Chil¬ dren were gradually introduced to work on fields and to take care of a livestock. Old children games that were actually the mimics of work done by grown-ups and of social events, their particular terminology - all that has vanished in a great deal and was replaced by football, volleyball or even video-games. Wedding - There are two models of weddings: a traditional model that presents the state of wedding customs and rituals that existed up to 1970s and a contem¬ porary model of wedding. Traditional model of wedding has all the elements of the rite de passage . The constant in both models is the wedding conviviality, presenting the newlyweds with gifts, wedding at church (at the time of building of Socialism this was a very rare occasion), wedding lunch, reduced elements of symbolic and magic actions aimed to protect health and fertility of newlyweds, and the dowry. Novelties are the wedding trip (a honey-moon trip) and video-recording of the course of wedding. Today it is still common to give modern furniture, small household appliances and (seldom) motor vehicles as a dowry. Sending-off to army is a new custom established in 1960s under influences coming from Serbia and TV. The recruits family organises a festive sending-off in the presence of several hundred guest from the circle of relatives and friends. This new custom is basically the old bricolage as it contains a series of ele¬ ments (rites) from the wedding ritual. Death -A complex of posthumous rituals mainly includes all relevant tradi¬ tional customs and rites. This segment of traditional culture undergoes very slow changes. At the moment of death a candle must be lit. Apassage of the deceased from the world of living to the other world ritually lasts one year and it is divided in time segments of: eight days, six weeks, halfa year and one year. Mourning for the deceased is expressed publicly by crying, wailing and wearing black. On the other hand, very little is undertaken to deceive the deceased and prevent him/her 615 from returning as a vampire. For that purpose, a handful of poppy seeds are put inside the coffin so that the deceased would be left to count them all and thus be deceived. The deceased spends the night in the house and is buried the following day with folded arms on his/her chest in a position East-West and the face turned towards the rising Sun. Wailing for the deceased is most intensive before the burial, while the body is lying on bier in the deceased s house. Only women bewail, while men only oc¬ casionally utter short messages. Not only close female relatives bewail but also other female members of the local community whose close relative has recently passed away. They call upon the deceased to convey messages to their deceased relatives. And vice versa, they call upon the earlier deceased to spread their arms and welcome the newly deceased. All stages of departure of the living with the deceased are followed by a series of rites among which posthumous feasts and erection of tombstone are the most important. During the four days in a year that are devoted to the dead (so called Zadušnice / All Souls Day), food, water and vine are fumigated with es¬ sence at home and then are taken to the cemetery and put directly onto the kitchen towel veiled over the grave. A candle is lit, vine is poured over the grave in a shape of the cross, then the food and drinks are consumed. As from the 1960s, when a young person dies a chapel is built - a par¬ ticular type of an emphatic family vault with a full epitaph (sometimes written in rhymes), with photographs of the deceased and tables and chairs where relatives gather on the All Souls Day. B) Village as ritual and religious community - This term means an organ¬ ized ritual-religious collective activities of rural community s members. The ac¬ tivities are not aimed to effect (super) natural, superior (divine) forces that are supposed to help with health, fertility of fields, people and livestock. In general, a village is a permanent ritual-religious community. Church, authorities and tradi¬ tional culture have had most influence on the creation of such a community. Main characteristics of the village as a ritual-religious community are: celebration of the church and village Patron Saint ( zavetina ); rural collective festivities: lit- ija (procession), All Souls Day Saint (Zadušnice) and votive days Marvena slava (livestock Patron Saint) and Decija slava (children Patron Saint) when the service is held at church for the health of children and livestock. As for the organization, a village, as a ritual community, has three levels of actions: 1) on general level, when the whole rural community is involved; 2) on representative level (delegations) when specially selected and recognized groups act in the name and to the benefit of the whole community; 3) on personal level i.e. the representative of rural community. If we do not count a parish rector then there are only two levels left nowadays. V) Annual festive calendar - ecclesiastic and folk customary aspects of festivities during winter, spring, summer and autumn period. Every Christian celebration has two aspects: the first one is a narrow-Christian aspect and it is celebrated according to ecclesiastic canons while the other is popular i.e. it be- 616 longs to folk religion. National celebration of calendar holidays contains a series of elements of ritual-religious nature aimed for the health of people and fertility of fields and livestock. The term of folk religion implies the religion of a mainly agrarian society which roots lies in pagan beliefs and it is of a double origin: 1. it originates from the old Slavic religion, and 2. it comes from the religion of the ancient Balkans people with whom the Serbs mixed and blended. We may say that there is the third root of folk religion, and that is the Christianity itself which influenced and changed pagan beliefs whereas in some segments it was pagan¬ ized itself. A development of folk religion points out more clearly two following tendencies: either a repression or Christianization of pagan customs and beliefs. Besides the church, government institutions and enlightening ideas of 18* and 1 9th century played a significant role thereto. Without any wish to explain in detail each festivity, it is necessary to point out hereto that as the biggest Christian festivity, Easter, is concerned - apart from colouring and lavishly decorating the eggs there are no other significant folk cus¬ toms thereof. On the second day of Easter which is the most important Day of the Dead (dan mrtvih) when few members of each household are obliged to go to the cemetery where they feast on the blessed food and drinks. Celebration of Christmas Eve involves much more folk customs. They clearly present numer¬ ous elements of agrarian rituals aimed for heath and fertility of fields, livestock and people, and the cult of ancestors as well. On the other hand there is a smaller Christian holiday Sv. Teodor Tirón (St Theodore Tirón) (2nd March). There are no particular folk customs to be performed on this day. Nevertheless, there is a folk holiday related to the name of this Saint that is called Todorova Subota . It always falls on first Saturday of the great Easter Lent. This is the Day of Theod¬ ore s horse(men) Cult that is well known among peoples of the Balkans. This is the day when all needle work performed by women is strictly forbidden - tabooed (spinning, weaving, and sawing); koljivo (ritual food made of wheat) and ritual bread in the shape of a horse shoe are prepared on that day. Popular belief that Theodore s horses run through villages at night and run over everyone on their way still exists today. Stories tell that some woman got punished for violating the taboo and ailed for 6 weeks with the traces of horse hooves on her body. Slava (ritual celebration, veneration and observation of a Christian Family Patron Saint) takes a special place in religious life and traditional culture. Slava is inherited from the head of the household (from father to son), while women inherit the slava only if they are married in a matrilocal marriage. Slava can be inherited even if someone inherits or buy a house then he/she inherits both the slava and the family Saint s icon, therefore it is not rare to find families with two or even three slavas. Main elements of the slava are: the slava candle, koljivo (boiled wheat), the slava pledge (toast), ritual blessing, cutting and lining up of the slava cake (usually performed at home or at church), the slava roast-meat (piglet) or fish (at the time of fasting). The slava is celebrated among all gathered members of family and invited guests. 617 G) Demonie creatures - According to their function and origin the Serbian religion ethnology has established a classification of demonic creatures: demons of nature, demons of illness, domestic demons, demons arising from the people with demonic characteristics, and other demons. The word demon does not exist in the folk speech but is replaced by euphemisms such as: that one, this one, and these women that do these things. Beliefs and presumptions of demons are ex¬ pressed in a descriptive way. The demons that live even today in folk tales are fairies, witches, vampires... 618
any_adam_object	1
author	Pavković, Nikola F. 1931-
author_GND	(DE-588)1072770431
author_facet	Pavković, Nikola F. 1931-
author_role	aut
author_sort	Pavković, Nikola F. 1931-
author_variant	n f p nf nfp
building	Verbundindex
bvnumber	BV035988782
callnumber-first	D - World History
callnumber-label	DR2125
callnumber-raw	DR2125.G35
callnumber-search	DR2125.G35
callnumber-sort	DR 42125 G35
callnumber-subject	DR - Balkan Peninsula
ctrlnum	(OCoLC)501401939 (DE-599)BVBBV035988782
era	Geschichte gnd
era_facet	Geschichte
format	Book
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02323nam a2200577 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV035988782</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20190329 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">100201s2009 ab\|\| \|\|\|\| 00\|\|\| srp d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9788679460424</subfield><subfield code="9">978-86-7946-042-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)501401939</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV035988782</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">srp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-Re13</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">DR2125.G35</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">7,41</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pavković, Nikola F.</subfield><subfield code="d">1931-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1072770431</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Banatsko selo</subfield><subfield code="b">društvene i kulturne promene ; Gaj i Dubovac</subfield><subfield code="c">Nikola F. Pavković</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Novi Sad</subfield><subfield code="b">Matica Srpska</subfield><subfield code="c">2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">636, XXXII S.</subfield><subfield code="b">Ill., Kt.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In kyrill. Schr., serb. - Zsfassung in engl. Sprache u.d.T.: The Banat village ...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Geschichte</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Soziokultur</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4299677-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Gaj (Serbia) / History</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Dubovac (Serbia) / History</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Dubovac (Serbia)</subfield><subfield code="x">History</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Gaj (Serbia)</subfield><subfield code="x">History</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Dubovac</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)7700190-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gaj</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)7699668-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Gaj</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)7699668-2</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Soziokultur</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4299677-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Geschichte</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Dubovac</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)7700190-4</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Soziokultur</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4299677-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Geschichte</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSBMuenchen</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=018881541&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=018881541&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-018881541</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">307.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0903</subfield><subfield code="g">4971</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">306.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0904</subfield><subfield code="g">4971</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">307.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0904</subfield><subfield code="g">4971</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">306.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0903</subfield><subfield code="g">4971</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
geographic	Gaj (Serbia) / History Dubovac (Serbia) / History Dubovac (Serbia) History Gaj (Serbia) History Dubovac (DE-588)7700190-4 gnd Gaj (DE-588)7699668-2 gnd
geographic_facet	Gaj (Serbia) / History Dubovac (Serbia) / History Dubovac (Serbia) History Gaj (Serbia) History Dubovac Gaj
id	DE-604.BV035988782
illustrated	Illustrated
indexdate	2024-07-09T22:09:06Z
institution	BVB
isbn	9788679460424
oai_aleph_id	oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-018881541
oclc_num	501401939
open_access_boolean
owner	DE-12 DE-Re13 DE-BY-UBR
owner_facet	DE-12 DE-Re13 DE-BY-UBR
physical	636, XXXII S. Ill., Kt.
publishDate	2009
publishDateSearch	2009
publishDateSort	2009
publisher	Matica Srpska
record_format	marc
spelling	Pavković, Nikola F. 1931- Verfasser (DE-588)1072770431 aut Banatsko selo društvene i kulturne promene ; Gaj i Dubovac Nikola F. Pavković Novi Sad Matica Srpska 2009 636, XXXII S. Ill., Kt. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier In kyrill. Schr., serb. - Zsfassung in engl. Sprache u.d.T.: The Banat village ... Geschichte gnd rswk-swf Geschichte Soziokultur (DE-588)4299677-6 gnd rswk-swf Gaj (Serbia) / History Dubovac (Serbia) / History Dubovac (Serbia) History Gaj (Serbia) History Dubovac (DE-588)7700190-4 gnd rswk-swf Gaj (DE-588)7699668-2 gnd rswk-swf Gaj (DE-588)7699668-2 g Soziokultur (DE-588)4299677-6 s Geschichte z DE-604 Dubovac (DE-588)7700190-4 g Digitalisierung BSBMuenchen application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=018881541&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=018881541&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Abstract
spellingShingle	Pavković, Nikola F. 1931- Banatsko selo društvene i kulturne promene ; Gaj i Dubovac Geschichte Soziokultur (DE-588)4299677-6 gnd
subject_GND	(DE-588)4299677-6 (DE-588)7700190-4 (DE-588)7699668-2
title	Banatsko selo društvene i kulturne promene ; Gaj i Dubovac
title_auth	Banatsko selo društvene i kulturne promene ; Gaj i Dubovac
title_exact_search	Banatsko selo društvene i kulturne promene ; Gaj i Dubovac
title_full	Banatsko selo društvene i kulturne promene ; Gaj i Dubovac Nikola F. Pavković
title_fullStr	Banatsko selo društvene i kulturne promene ; Gaj i Dubovac Nikola F. Pavković
title_full_unstemmed	Banatsko selo društvene i kulturne promene ; Gaj i Dubovac Nikola F. Pavković
title_short	Banatsko selo
title_sort	banatsko selo drustvene i kulturne promene gaj i dubovac
title_sub	društvene i kulturne promene ; Gaj i Dubovac
topic	Geschichte Soziokultur (DE-588)4299677-6 gnd
topic_facet	Geschichte Soziokultur Gaj (Serbia) / History Dubovac (Serbia) / History Dubovac (Serbia) History Gaj (Serbia) History Dubovac Gaj
url	http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=018881541&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=018881541&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA
work_keys_str_mv	AT pavkovicnikolaf banatskoselodrustveneikulturnepromenegajidubovac

Verfügbarkeit

Es ist kein Print-Exemplar vorhanden.

Fernleihe Bestellen Achtung: Nicht im THWS-Bestand! Inhaltsverzeichnis

MARC

Datensatz im Suchindex

Es ist kein Print-Exemplar vorhanden.

Ähnliche Einträge