The future of mutual recognition in criminal matters in the European Union: = L' avenir de la reconnaissance mutuelle en matière pénale dans l'Union européenne
Gespeichert in:
| Format: | Buch |
|---|---|
| Sprache: | English French |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Bruxelles
Éd. de l'Université de Bruxelles
2009
|
| Ausgabe: | 3. éd. |
| Schriftenreihe: | Études européennes
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | 603 S. |
| ISBN: | 9782800414522 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV035979310 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20100504 | ||
| 007 | t| | ||
| 008 | 100127s2009 xx |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9782800414522 |c (pbk.) : 30,00 EUR |9 978-2-8004-1452-2 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)436637933 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ311533124 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng |a fre | |
| 049 | |a DE-19 |a DE-12 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a KJC3800 | |
| 082 | 1 | |a 345 |2 1 | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The future of mutual recognition in criminal matters in the European Union |b = L' avenir de la reconnaissance mutuelle en matière pénale dans l'Union européenne |c ed. by Gisèle Vernimment-Van Tiggelen ... [Contributors: Silvia Adamo ...] |
| 246 | 1 | 1 | |a L' avenir de la reconnaissance mutuelle en matière pénale dans l'Union européenne |
| 250 | |a 3. éd. | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Bruxelles |b Éd. de l'Université de Bruxelles |c 2009 | |
| 300 | |a 603 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Études européennes | |
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 4 | |a Criminal jurisdiction |z Europe | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Criminal jurisdiction |z European Union countries | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Criminal law |z Europe |x International unification | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Criminal law |z European Union countries |x International unification | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Judgments, Foreign |z Europe | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Judgments, Foreign |z European Union countries | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Judicial assistance |z Europe | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Judicial assistance |z European Union countries | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Mitgliedsstaaten |0 (DE-588)4170174-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Strafrecht |0 (DE-588)4057795-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Strafverfahren |0 (DE-588)4116634-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsvereinheitlichung |0 (DE-588)4048849-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 4 | |a Europa | |
| 651 | 4 | |a Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Europäische Union |0 (DE-588)5098525-5 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Mitgliedsstaaten |0 (DE-588)4170174-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Strafrecht |0 (DE-588)4057795-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Strafverfahren |0 (DE-588)4116634-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a Rechtsvereinheitlichung |0 (DE-588)4048849-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Vernimmen- van Tiggelen, Gisèle |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Adamo, Silvia |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m SWB Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=018873249&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-018873249 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1820136427581603840 |
|---|---|
| adam_text |
TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD 7 INTRODUCTION GISELE VERNIMMEN-VAN TIGGELEN
ET LAURA SURANO 9 1. L'EMERGENCE DE LA RECONNAISSANCE MUTUELLE 9 2. LE
CONCEPT DE RECONNAISSANCE MUTUELLE : CE QU'IL SIGNIFIE ET CE QU'IL
IMPLIQUE. 11 3. L'ETAT DES LIEUX 12 4. L'ETUDE SUR L'AVENIR DE LA
RECONNAISSANCE MUTUELLE EN MATIERE PENALE 14 THE IMPLEMENTATION AND
APPLICATION OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION INSTRUMENTS IN AUSTRIA ROBERT KERT 17
1. INTRODUCTION 17 2. PERCEPTION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION
IN AUSTRIAN DOCTRINE AND PRACTICE 18 A. THE PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL
RECOGNITION 18 B. CRITICISMS OF THE PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION 19
C. EVALUATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION 21 D. LIMITS OF THE
PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION 22 E. MUTUAL RECOGNITION OF FINAL
JUDGEMENTS AND PRE-TRIAL DECISIONS 23 F. REASONS NOT TO RECOGNISE AND
EXECUTE A DECISION 23 G. CONSISTENCY BETWEEN THE EXISTING INSTRUMENTS OF
LEGAL ASSISTANCE 27 H. NECESSITY OF FLANKING MEASURES 27 3.
TRANSPOSITION OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION INSTRUMENTS 28 A. MUTUAL RECOGNITION
INSTRUMENTS TRANSPOSED IN AUSTRIAN LAW 28 B. REASONS FOR LATE
TRANSPOSITION 29 592 THE FUTURE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION C. DIFFICULTIES
DURING THE TRANSPOSITION PROCESS 31 D. SPECIFIC ISSUES RELATED TO
TRANSPOSITION 32 E. DECENTRALISED PROCEDURE 38 4. PRACTICAL
IMPLEMENTATION OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION AND OTHER JUDICIAL COOPERATION
INSTRUMENTS 38 A. GENERAL OPINION OF PRACTITIONERS ON MUTUAL RECOGNITION
INSTRUMENTS 39 B. COOPERATION BETWEEN DIFFERENT MEMBER STATES ON THE
BASIS OF THE MUTUAL RECOGNITION INSTRUMENTS 39 C. INFORMATION OF
PRACTITIONERS ON NEW MUTUAL RECOGNITION INSTRUMENTS 43 D. ROLE OF
PRACTITIONERS AT THE STAGE OF IMPLEMENTATION 44 E. RECORD OF SINGLE
CASES AND FEEDBACK MECHANISMS 44 F. APPLICATION OF THE FRAMEWORK
DECISION ON MUTUAL RECOGNITION OF FREEZING ORDERS IN PRACTICE 44 5.
CONCLUSIONS 45 LA RECONNAISSANCE MUTUELLE EN MATIERE PENALE EN BELGIQUE
ANNE WEYEMBERGH ET VERONICA SANTAMARIA 47 1. INTRODUCTION 47 2.
PERCEPTION GENERALE DE LA RECONNAISSANCE MUTUELLE 48 A. UN CONCEPT DONT
IL NE FAUT PAS SURESTIMER L'ORIGINALITE 49 B. UNE COOPERATION QUI N'EST
NI AUTOMATIQUE NI SANS LIMITES 50 C. UN PRINCIPE QUI NE SE SUFFIT PAS A
LUI-MEME : DE LA NECESSITE DE MESURES D'ACCOMPAGNEMENT 51 D. LA
RECONNAISSANCE MUTUELLE EN MATIERE PENALE AU SEIN DE L'UE : UN PRINCIPE
COHERENT ? 53 3. CONSIDERATIONS GENERALES SUR LA TRANSPOSITION DU
PRINCIPE DE LA RECONNAISSANCE MUTUELLE EN BELGIQUE 56 A. BILAN GENERAL
56 B. DIFFICULTES PARTICULIERES RENCONTREES 58 C. LE CHOIX DE LA
DECENTRALISATION 60 4. CONSIDERATIONS GENERALES SUR LA MISE EN *UVRE
PRATIQUE 61 A. BILAN GENERAL 61 B. DIFFICULTES PARTICULIERES RENCONTREES
62 C. L'IMPLICATION ET L'INFORMATION DES PRATICIENS 69 5. CONSIDERATIONS
TRANSVERSALES RELATIVES A QUELQUES MOTIFS DE REFUS 70 A. L'EXIGENCE DE
LA DOUBLE INCRIMINATION 70 B. LA CLAUSE DE TERRITORIALITE 72 C. LA
NATIONALITE ET LA RESIDENCE 73 D. LE RESPECT DES DROITS FONDAMENTAUX 74
6. CONCLUSION 76 L'APPLICATION DU PRINCIPE DE LA RECONNAISSANCE MUTUELLE
EN MATIERE PENALE EN BULGARIE 79 MARGARITA CHINO VA ET MILA ASSENOVA 79
1. INTRODUCTION 79 2. PERCEPTION GENERALE DU PRINCIPE DE RECONNAISSANCE
MUTUELLE 80 TABLE OF CONTENTS 593 A. L'ABSENCE DE DEFINITION DU PRINCIPE
DE RECONNAISSANCE MUTUELLE 80 B. LE MECANISME D'ELABORATION DE LA
POSITION NATIONALE DANS LE CADRE DES NEGOCIATIONS 82 C. LA TRANSPOSITION
DES INSTRUMENTS DE L'UE RELATIFS A LA RECONNAISSANCE MUTUELLE 83 3. LA
MISE EN *UVRE PRATIQUE DU PRINCIPE DE RECONNAISSANCE MUTUELLE 91 A.
L'APPLICATION DE LA DECISION-CADRE SUR LE MAE 91 B. L'APPLICATION DE LA
DECISION-CADRE SUR LE GEL 96 4. CONCLUSIONS ET PERSPECTIVES 96 CRIMINAL
LAW AND MUTUAL RECOGNITION IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC IVO SLOSARCIK 99 1.
INTRODUCTION: CZECH REPUBLIC, PRESIDENCY AND MUTUAL RECOGNITION 99 2. EU
LAW IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC 100 3. THE EA ^JUDGMENT OF THE CZECH
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT 105 4. PROBLEMS OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION IN CRIMINAL
MATTERS IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC. 108 A. THE LEGALITY OF PENAL SANCTIONS
AND THE DOUBLE CRIMINALITY TEST 108 B. TERRITORIALITY 109 C. LANGUAGE
ACCESSIBILITY ILL D. SPECIAL PROTECTION OF CZECH CITIZENS (AND
RESIDENTS) 112 5. CONCLUSION: AWAITING CASE LAW? 113 THE PERCEPTION OF
THE PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION OF JUDICIAL DECISIONS IN CRIMINAL
MATTERS IN GERMANY THOMAS WAHL 115 1. INTRODUCTION 115 2. THE CURRENT
APPLICATION OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION INSTRUMENTS 119 A. IMPLEMENTATION 119
B. GENERAL PERCEPTION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION IN CRIMINAL
MATTERS 121 C. MUTUAL RECOGNITION AND HARMONISATION OF SUBSTANTIVE LAW
122 D. MUTUAL RECOGNITION AND APPROXIMATION OF PROCEDURAL LAW 122 E.
GROUNDS FOR REFUSAL (I): THE ABSENCE OF DOUBLE CRIMINALITY 124 F.
GROUNDS FOR REFUSAL (II): THE TERRITORIALITY CLAUSE 127 G. TREATMENT OF
NATIONALS AND RESIDENTS 128 H. THE DEFENCE LAWYERS' POSITION 131 3.
AREAS FOR OTHER EU INSTRUMENTS 135 A. THE RIGHTS OF DEFENCE 135 B.
COLLECTION OF EVIDENCE 136 C. COORDINATION OF PROSECUTIONS 137 4.
METHODOLOGY. HORIZONTAL PROBLEMS 138 A. NEGOTIATIONS 138 B.
TRANSPOSITION 139 C. APPLICATION IN PRACTICE 139 5. MUTUAL TRUST.
PRACTICAL FLANKING MEASURES 142 A. MUTUAL TRUST: MYTH OR REALITY? 142
594 THE FUTURE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION B. FLANKING MEASURES 142 6.
CONCLUSIONS 144 MUTUAL RECOGNITION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS: THE DANISH
EXPERIENCE JOIN VESTERGAARD AND SILVIA ADAMO 147 1. INTRODUCTION 147 2.
THE TWO MAJOR ACTS IMPLEMENTING MUTUAL RECOGNITION IN DENMARK 148 A. THE
1967 EXTRADITION ACT, AS AMENDED IN 2003 AND SUBSEQUENTLY 148 B. THE
2004 ACT ON EXECUTION OF DECISIONS IN CRIMINAL MATTERS INTHEEU 157 3.
TRANSPOSITION OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION INSTRUMENTS 159 A. CONSTITUTIONAL
SETTING AND PARLIAMENTARY TRADITION 159 B. THE TRANSPOSITION OF MUTUAL
RECOGNITION INSTRUMENTS 160 C. PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED CONCERNING
TRANSPOSITION 161 D. RECIPROCITY AND TERRITORIALITY ISSUES 162 E.
PROCEDURES FOR EXECUTING A DECISION ISSUED IN ANOTHER MEMBER STATE.
162 F. ISSUES REGARDING FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS 163 4. INVOLVEMENT OF
PRACTITIONERS, THEIR ASSESSMENT OF MR AND PRACTICAL APPLICATION 164 A.
INVOLVEMENT OF PRACTITIONERS IN NEGOTIATIONS AND TRANSPOSITION 164 B.
PRACTITIONERS' GENERAL ASSESSMENT OF THE MUTUAL RECOGNITION INSTRUMENTS
164 C. PRACTICAL APPLICATION 166 5. CONCLUSIONS 172 THE RECEPTION OF THE
PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEMS OF EU
MEMBER STATES. THE CASE OF GREECE VALSAMIS MITSILEGAS 175 1.
INTRODUCTION 175 2. MUTUAL RECOGNITION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS AND THE GREEK
AUTHORITIES 176 3. THE GREEK LAW ON THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT 178 A.
NEGOTIATIONS AND ISSUES 178 B. THE TEXT 179 4. MUTUAL RECOGNITION IN THE
GREEK COURTS 182 A. METHODOLOGY AND ISSUES 182 B. THE SURRENDER OF OWN
NATIONALS AND THE GREEK CONSTITUTION 184 5. CONCLUSION 185 MUTUAL
RECOGNITION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS IN SPAIN 189 ANGELES G. ZARZA 189 1.
INTRODUCTION 189 2. NEGOTIATION OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION INSTRUMENTS 190 A.
GENERAL REMARKS 190 B. CONCEPT AND SCOPE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION 193 C.
CONCRETE EXAMPLES OF THE SPANISH APPROACH 196 D. COMPLEMENTARY MEASURES
TO MUTUAL RECOGNITION 197 TABLE OF CONTENTS 595 3. TRANSPOSITION OF
EUROPEAN INSTRUMENTS INTO THE SPANISH LEGAL SYSTEM 198 A. THE
TRANSPOSITION PROCESS 198 B. THE INSTRUMENTS IMPLEMENTED 201 C.
INSTRUMENTS NOT YET IMPLEMENTED. SOME ISSUES 205 4. INTERPRETATION AND
APPLICATION OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION INSTRUMENTS BY SPANISH JUDICIAL
AUTHORITIES 206 A. JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION OF THE MUTUAL RECOGNITION
PRINCIPLE 206 B. FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND MUTUAL RECOGNITION PRINCIPLE 212
C. USEFUL TOOLS AND TRAINING ON MUTUAL RECOGNITION INSTRUMENTS FOR
PRACTITIONERS 214 D. DATABASES AND STATISTICAL INFORMATION 215 5.
CONCLUSION 216 THE FINNISH APPROACH TO MUTUAL RECOGNITION IN CRIMINAL
MATTERS AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION ANNIKA SUOMINEN 219 1. INTRODUCTION 219
2. LEGISLATION AND NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MUTUAL RECOGNITION
INSTRUMENTS 220 A. THE MUTUAL RECOGNITION LEGISLATION IN FINLAND 220 B.
TERMINOLOGY, ESPECIALLY RELATING TO THE EXTRADITION ACT 221 C. THE
SYSTEM OF RECOGNITION 222 3. SPECIFIE IMPLEMENTATION OF CERTAIN
PROVISIONS 223 A. THE REQUIREMENT OF DOUBLE CRIMINALITY 223 B.
PROVISIONS ON HUMAN RIGHTS 224 C. PROVISIONS ON TERRITORIALITY 226 D.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS WITH REGARD TO CITIZENS AND RESIDENTS 227 E.
ADDITIONAL AMENDMENTS OF THE REFUSAL GROUNDS 228 F. CONCLUSION ON THE
IMPLEMENTATION 229 4. THE CONCEPT OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION 229 A. HOW
MUTUAL RECOGNITION IS UNDERSTOOD 229 B. PRACTITIONERS' UNDERSTANDING AND
USE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION 231 5. PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED 231 A. CONFRONTED
PROBLEMS 231 B. CONCLUSION ON THE PROBLEMS 237 6. CONCLUDING REMARKS 237
BILAN ET PERSPECTIVES DU PRINCIPE DE RECONNAISSANCE MUTUELLE EN MATIERE
PENALE EN FRANCE MAITENA POELEMANS 239 1. INTRODUCTION. DEFINITION ET
PERCEPTION DU PRINCIPE DE RECONNAISSANCE MUTUELLE 239 2. UN BILAN EN
DEMI-TEINTE DE LA MISE EN *UVRE DU PRINCIPE DE RECONNAISSANCE MUTUELLE
241 A. UNE COPIE EN DEGRADES » DES ACTES LEGISLATIFS EUROPEENS 241 B.
UNE MISE EN *UVRE EN RANGS SERRES » DES DISPOSITIONS LEGISLATIVES 247
596 THE FUTURE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION 3. LES PERSPECTIVES EN CLAIR-OBSCUR
DE LA MISE EN *UVRE DU PRINCIPE DE RECONNAISSANCE MUTUELLE 252 A. UNE
SIMILARITE DES TEXTES POUR DES RESULTATS INEGAUX 252 B. UN RENFORCEMENT
OBLIGE DE LA CONFIANCE MUTUELLE 254 4. CONCLUSION 257 THE PRINCIPLE OF
MUTUAL RECOGNITION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS IN HUNGARY KATALIN LIGETI 259 1.
INTRODUCTION 259 2. THE PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION AND THE
HUNGARIAN CONSTITUTION 260 A. THE PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION AND
THE LEGALITY PRINCIPLE 260 B. SURRENDER OF HUNGARIAN NATIONALS 263 3.
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MUTUAL RECOGNITION PRINCIPLE IN HUNGARY 264 A.
THE LIMITS OF THE PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION 266 B. MUTUAL
RECOGNITION OF FINAL JUDGMENTS AND OF PRE-TRIAL DECISIONS 269 C. THE
PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION AND DOUBLE CRIMINALITY 270 D. THE
APPLICATION OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION AND PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS 272 E. THE
PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION AND HUMAN RIGHTS STANDARDS 274 F. THE
PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION AND RECIPROCITY 275 4. PRACTICAL ASPECTS
OF THE APPLICATION OF THE MUTUAL RECOGNITION PRINCIPLE 276 A. THE
HUNGARIAN MINISTRY OF JUSTICE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT AS CENTRAL AUTHORITY
276 B. THE TRAINING OF PRACTITIONERS 277 C. INFORMATION FOR THE GENERAL
PUBLIC 277 5. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MUTUAL RECOGNITION AND
HARMONISATION 278 6. CONCLUSIONS 280 IRISH PRACTICE ON MUTUAL
RECOGNITION OF EUROPEAN UNION CRIMINAL LAW GERARD CONWAY 283 1.
INTRODUCTION 283 2. METHOD AND DATA 284 3. CONTEXT OF IRISH CRIMINAL LAW
AND PROCEDURE 285 4. BACKGROUND TO EXTRADITION AND MUTUAL LEGAL
ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS IN IRISH LAW 286 5. IRISH STATUTORY
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT 289 A. GENERAL 289 B.
INTERPRETING THE DECLARATION IN IRISH LAW 291 C. INTERPRETING THE
DECLARATION IN EU LAW 294 D. AMENDMENTS TO THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT
2003 ACT MADE BY THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE (TERRORIST OFFENCES) ACT 2005 295
6. IRISH CASELAW ON THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT 296 7. THE EUROPEAN
EVIDENCE WARRANT FROM AN IRISH PERSPECTIVE 299 A. BACKGROUND 299 B.
CHANGES INVOLVED IN EEW 299 C. BROADER SIGNIFICANCE OF THE EEW 300 TABLE
OF CONTENTS 597 8. IRELAND AND MORE RECENT THIRD PILLAR MEASURES -
CRIMINAL JUSTICE (MUTUAL ASSISTANCE) ACT 2008 302 9. IRELAND, THE TREATY
ON A CONSTITUTION FOR EUROPE AND THE LISBON TREATY 304 10. CONCLUSIONS -
A SUMMARY OF CHALLENGES AND SUCCESSES OF THE PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL
RECOGNITION FROM AN IRISH PERSPECTIVE 305 LA RECONNAISSANCE MUTUELLE ET
LA MISE EN *UVRE DU MANDAT D'ARRET EUROPEEN DANS TORDRE JURIDIQUE
ITALIEN GAETANO DE AMICIS 309 1. LE PRINCIPE DE RECONNAISSANCE MUTUELLE
DANS LA PERSPECTIVE DE LA COOPERATION JUDICIAIRE PENALE 309 2. LA MISE
EN *UVRE DES INSTRUMENTS DE RECONNAISSANCE MUTUELLE DANS L'ORDRE
JURIDIQUE ITALIEN : LA LOI DU 22 AVRIL 2005, N 69, RELATIVE AU MANDAT
D'ARRET EUROPEEN 310 3. LA COMPATIBILITE » CONSTITUTIONNELLE DU MAE
311 4. LES POINTS CRITIQUES » DE LA LEGISLATION ITALIENNE RELATIVE AU
MAE : L'EXTENSION DE LA LISTE DES MOTIFS DE REFUS 312 A. CONSIDERATIONS
GENERALES 312 B. L'EVALUATION DES CIRCONSTANCES AGGRAVANTES 314 C. LA
DOCUMENTATION COMPLEMENTAIRE » 314 D. L'EVALUATION DES GRAVES
INDICES DE CULPABILITE » 315 E. LA RESURGENCE » DE LA DOUBLE
INCRIMINATION 315 F. LES DISPOSITIONS TRANSITOIRES 317 G. LE ROLE DE
L'AUTORITE CENTRALE 317 5. LE FONCTIONNEMENT DE LA PROCEDURE PASSIVE »
DE REMISE : FONDEMENTS ET CONDITIONS 318 A. CONSIDERATIONS GENERALES 318
B. LES DELAIS DE LA PROCEDURE D'EXECUTION 319 C. LA VALIDATION DE
L'ARRESTATION ET L'APPLICATION DES MESURES COERCITIVES 320 D. LES DELAIS
DES MESURES PROVISOIRES PERSONNELLES 322 E. LA DECISION SUR L'EXECUTION
DU MAE 323 F. LES VOIES DE RECOURS 324 6. LE FONCTIONNEMENT DE LA
PROCEDURE ACTIVE » DE REMISE 324 A. LA COMPETENCE POUR L'EMISSION DU
MAE 325 B. LE MAE FONDE SUR LA MESURE COERCITIVE DE LA DETENTION
DOMICILIAIRE . 326 C. L'EMISSION DU MAE PAR RAPPORT AUX PROCEDURES
D'EXECUTION DE LA PEINE 326 7. LES PRINCIPALES ORIENTATIONS
JURISPRUDENTIELLES : L'INTERPRETATION CORRECTIVE » DE LA GRANDE
CHAMBRE (SEZIONI UNITE) DE LA COUR DE CASSATION 327 A. LES INDICES
GRAVES DE CULPABILITE 328 B. LA QUESTION DES LIMITES MAXIMALES DE LA
DETENTION PROVISOIRE 328 C. LES DELAIS POUR L'ACQUISITION DE LA
DOCUMENTATION COMPLEMENTAIRE 330 D. LA QUESTION DES GARANTIES DU
PROCES EQUITABLE » 332 E. LA REMISE DU CITOYEN ITALIEN 333 598 THE
FUTURE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION F. VERS UN PRINCIPE DE PROPORTIONNALITE
DANS L'EXECUTION DES DEMANDES DE REMISE ? 336 8. PERSPECTIVES DE IURE
CONDENDO 337 FUTURE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS IN THE
EUROPEAN UNION: LITHUANIA GINTARAS SVEDAS AND DARIUS MICKEVICIUS 339 1.
INTRODUCTION 339 2. GROUNDS FOR REFUSAL, CONDITIONS AND OTHER
LIMITATIONS RESTRICTING THE SCOPE OF MR 343 A. DOUBLE CRIMINALITY 343 B.
NATIONALITY OF THE CULPRIT 346 C. TERRITORIALITY CLAUSE 347 D. GROUNDS
RELATED TO PROCEDURAL DIFFERENCES 348 E. HUMAN RIGHTS CLAUSE 349 F.
OTHER "NEW" GROUNDS FOR REFUSAL 351 3. PROCEDURE 351 4. FUTURE PROSPECTS
353 A. ISSUE OF PROPORTIONALITY 354 B. ATTENTION TO THE IDENTITY OF A
SUSPECT 355 C. APPROXIMATION OF LAWS 355 D. CODIFICATION 356 E.
NON-LEGISLATIVE INITIATIVES 358 F. PRINCIPLE OF MR IN THE AREA OF
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFENCES 358 5. CONCLUSIONS 358 LES APPORTS DE LA
RECONNAISSANCE MUTUELLE A LA COOPERATION JUDICIAIRE PENALE ET SES
DEFICITS. BILAN DE L'EXPERIENCE LUXEMBOURGEOISE STEFAN BRAUM 361 1.
INTRODUCTION 361 2. LA MISE EN *UVRE DU PRINCIPE DE RECONNAISSANCE
MUTUELLE EN DROIT LUXEMBOURGEOIS 362 A. REALISATION ET IMPLICATIONS DES
ACTES LEGISLATIFS EUROPEENS 362 B. INQUIETUDES DE LA PRATIQUE MALGRE
L'EFFICACITE AFFICHEE 364 3. L'IMPACT DU PRINCIPE DE RM SUR LE SYSTEME
NATIONAL DE JUSTICE PENALE 365 A. LA RECONNAISSANCE MUTUELLE DES
DECISIONS JUDICIAIRES FACE A L'EXAMEN DE LA DOUBLE INCRIMINATION 365 B.
UN PRINCIPE CONFRONTE A L'HARMONISATION DES LEGISLATIONS NATIONALES 367
4. LES DIFFICULTES RENCONTREES DANS LA PRATIQUE DE LA COOPERATION PENALE
370 A. POUR LE DEVELOPPEMENT DE BONNES PRATIQUES EN REPONSE AUX DEFIS
ACTUELS 370 B. LE MANDAT D'OBTENTION DES PREUVES, UN EXEMPLE
D'APPLICATION FUTURE DE LA RECONNAISSANCE MUTUELLE EN PROCEDURE PENALE
372 5. D'UNE PROTECTION EUROPEENNE DES DROITS FONDAMENTAUX 377 6.
L'AMBIVALENCE DE LA CLAUSE DE TERRITORIALITE : MOTIF DE REFUS ET SOURCE
DE CONFLIT DE JURIDICTION 379 TABLE OF CONTENTS 599 7. COHERENCE DES
INSTRUMENTS DE RECONNAISSANCE MUTUELLE 381 8. CONCLUSIONS ET
PERSPECTIVES 382 JUDICIAL COOPERATION AND MUTUAL RECOGNITION IN CRIMINAL
MATTERS IN MALTA STEFANO FILLETTI AND ALISON GATT 385 1. STATE OF PLAY
385 2. DOUBLE CRIMINALITY AND TERRITORIALITY CLAUSE 386 A. DOUBLE
CRIMINALITY 386 B. TERRITORIALITY CLAUSE 387 3. OTHER GROUNDS FOR
REFUSAL 388 A. MANDATORY GROUNDS UNDER MALTESE LAW 388 B. OPTIONAL
GROUNDS 389 C. ADDITIONAL GROUNDS 390 4. COMPETENT JUDICIAL AUTHORITIES
391 5. CONTENT AND FORM 392 6. TIME LIMITS, POSTPONEMENT OF EXECUTION OR
TEMPORARY SURRENDER 393 A. TIME LIMITS 393 B. POSTPONEMENT OF EXECUTION
OR TEMPORARY SURRENDER 394 7. PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS 396 8. SOME
SPECIFIC ISSUES RELATED TO EAW 397 A. MULTIPLE REQUESTS 397 B. RULE OF
SPECIALITY 397 C. ACCESSORY SURRENDER 399 D. SUBSEQUENT EXTRADITION 399
9. CONCLUSION 400 THE NETHERLANDS AND MUTUAL RECOGNITION: BETWEEN
PROPORTIONALITY AND THE RULE OF LAW WOUTER VAN BALLEGOOIJ 401 1.
INTRODUCTION 401 2. GENERAL APPROACH TOWARDS MUTUAL RECOGNITION IN THE
NETHERLANDS 404 A. MINISTRY 404 B. PROSECUTORS 405 C. DISTRICT COURT OF
AMSTERDAM 406 D. LAWYERS 407 3. LIMITS 407 A. COMPLIANCE WITH THE RULE
OF LAW 408 B . PROPORTIONALITY 411 4. HARMONISATION AND PRACTICAL
MEASURES 415 5. CONCLUSION 416 FROM EU WITH TRUST: THE POTENTIAL AND
LIMITS OF THE MUTUAL RECOGNITION IN THE THIRD PILLAR FROM THE POLISH
PERSPECTIVE ADAM LAZOWSKI 419 1. INTRODUCTION 419 2. THE EUROPEAN ARREST
WARRANT AND THE TRANSPOSITION OF THE FRAMEWORK DECISION 422 600 THE
FUTURE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION A. FROM PRE-ACCESSION APPROXIMATION TO
IMPLEMENTATION - THE FIRST TRANSPOSITION EFFORT 422 B. THE
CONSTITUTIONAL DRAMA 426 C. THE REVISION OF ART. 55 POLISH CONSTITUTION
AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE 1997 432 3. TESTING THE POTENTIAL AND LIMITS
OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION - THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT IN PRACTICE 434 A.
GENERAL PERCEPTION OF THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT 434 B. DO WE LIKE IT
TOO MUCH? THE (OVER)USE OF THE EAW BY POLISH AUTHORITIES 434 C. OVERVIEW
OF CASE-LAW OF THE SUPREME COURT AND ORDINARY COURTS 436 D. CONCLUSIONS
439 4. BEYOND THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT: QUO VADISL 440 A.
INTRODUCTION 440 B. THE TRANSPOSITION OF OTHER FRAMEWORK DECISIONS
DEALING WITH THE MUTUAL RECOGNITION 440 C. THE GENERAL PERCEPTION OF THE
PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS 441 5. CONCLUSIONS
444 THE PORTUGUESE EXPERIENCE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS:
FIVE YEARS OF EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT PEDRO CAEIRO AND SONIA FIDALGO 445
1. INTRODUCTION 445 2. THE LEGISLATIVE LEVEL 446 A. NATIONAL LEGAL
FRAMEWORK: THE PORTUGUESE CONSTITUTION AND LAW NO. 65/2003 OF 23 AUGUST
2003 446 B. COMPLIANCE OF PORTUGUESE LAW WITH THE FD EAW 447 3. THE
JUDICIAL LEVEL 456 A. MUTUAL RECOGNITION AS A TOPIC AND A GROUND FOR
JUDICIAL DECISIONS 456 B. CASE-LAW ON OTHER ISSUES RAISED BY THE EAW 457
4. CONCLUSION 463 LE PRINCIPE DE RECONNAISSANCE MUTUELLE DES DECISIONS
JUDICIAIRES DANS L'UNION EUROPEENNE DEVANT LES JURIDICTIONS ROUMAINES.
PRESENT ET PERSPECTIVES FLORIN STRETEANU ET DIANA IONESCU 465 1. LE
CADRE LEGISLATIF NATIONAL 465 2. L'INTERPRETATION DU PRINCIPE DE RM EN
DROIT INTERNE 468 A. LA REGLEMENTATION DU PRINCIPE DE RM DANS LA LOI 468
B. L'APPROCHE DES MAGISTRATS SUR LE PRINCIPE DE RM 468 C.
L'INTERPRETATION DU PRINCIPE PAR LA JURISPRUDENCE 469 3. L'APPLICATION
DES DISPOSITIONS SUR LE MAE EN ROUMANIE 471 A. LA COMPATIBILITE DU MAE
AVEC LES DISPOSITIONS CONSTITUTIONNELLES RELATIVES A L'EXTRADITION DES
CITOYENS ROUMAINS 471 B. L'APPLICATION DANS LE TEMPS DES NORMES
RELATIVES AU MAE 472 C. L'AUTORITE JUDICIAIRE COMPETENTE 473 TABLE OF
CONTENTS 601 D. LA DOUBLE INCRIMINATION DU FAIT 475 E. LA CLAUSE DE
TERRITORIALITE 477 F. LES MOTIFS DE NON-EXECUTION DU MAE 477 G. LE
RESPECT DES DROITS FONDAMENTAUX 479 H. LE RESPECT DES DROITS DE LA
DEFENSE 482 4. L'APPLICATION DES DISPOSITIONS CONCERNANT LES DECISIONS
DE GEL DE BIENS OU D'ELEMENTS DE PREUVE 483 5. L'APPLICATION DES
DISPOSITIONS SUR LA RECONNAISSANCE MUTUELLE DES SANCTIONS PECUNIAIRES
484 6. L'APPLICATION DES DISPOSITIONS SUR LA RECONNAISSANCE MUTUELLE DES
DECISIONS DE CONFISCATION 485 7. CONCLUSIONS 486 THE APPROACH OF SWEDISH
PRACTITIONERS TO THE PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS
LAURA SURANO 487 1. INTRODUCTION 487 2. STATE OF PLAY REGARDING MUTUAL
RECOGNITION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS IN SWEDEN 488 A. LEGISLATION
IMPLEMENTING EU INSTRUMENTS 488 B. MUTUAL RECOGNITION AND MUTUAL TRUST:
THE NORDIC COOPERATION MODEL . 489 3. TRANSPOSITION OF MUTUAL
RECOGNITION INSTRUMENTS 490 A. TRANSPOSITION PROCEDURE AND COMPETENT
AUTHORITIES 490 B. SPECIFIC ISSUES RELATED TO THE EAW 492 4. PRACTICAL
APPLICATION OF THE EAW AND OTHER JUDICIAL COOPERATION INSTRUMENTS.
494 A. EAW: GROUNDS FOR REFUSAL, DUAL CRIMINALITY AND SUPERVISION
INSTEAD OF DETENTION 494 B. FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND PROCEDURAL GUARANTEES
495 C. TRANSFER OF PROCEEDINGS AND CONFLICTS OF JURISDICTION 496 D.
TRANSFER OF ENFORCEMENT OF SENTENCE 497 E. ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE AND
APPROXIMATION OF RULES REGARDING EVIDENCE GATHERING. THE SWEDISH
EXPERIENCE ON JOINT INVESTIGATION TEAMS 497 F. TRAINING FOR
PRACTITIONERS AND FEEDBACK ON APPLICATION OF THE EAW 498 5. CONCLUSIONS
499 MUTUAL RECOGNITION IN THE CONTEXT OF SLOVENIAN CRIMINAL LAW KATJA
SUGMAN STUBBS AND MOJCA MIHELJ PLESNICAR 501 1. INTRODUCTION 501 2.
TRANSPOSITION OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION INSTRUMENTS 502 A. STATE OF
IMPLEMENTATION 502 B. PRINCIPAL PROBLEMS IN TRANSPOSING THE EU
INSTRUMENTS 507 3. LIMITS TO THE PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION,
HARMONISATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUES 509 A. FINAL DECISIONS V.
PRE-TRIAL DECISIONS 509 B. HARMONISATION OF LAWS 509 C. CRIMINAL LAW
PRINCIPLES AND HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUES 511 602 THE FUTURE OF MUTUAL
RECOGNITION 4. CODIFICATION OR CONSOLIDATION OF THE VARIOUS INSTRUMENTS
BASED ON THE MUTUAL RECOGNITION PRINCIPLE 513 5. PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE
WITH MUTUAL RECOGNITION INSTRUMENTS 514 A. THE EAW AS A MODEL PROCEDURE
515 B. PRACTITIONERS' POINT OF VIEW 517 C. PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES 519 D.
LIMITS TO THE PRINCIPLE AND GROUNDS FOR REFUSAL IN PRACTICE 521 6.
CONCLUSION 522 MUTUAL RECOGNITION OF DECISIONS IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND
THE UNITED KINGDOM JOHN R. SPENCER 523 1. POPULAR ATTITUDES IN BRITAIN
TOWARDS EUROPE AND EUROPEAN CRIMINAL LAW 523 A. THE MORAL SUPERIORITY OF
THE "COMMON LAW" 524 B. "EUROMYTHS" 525 C. "POPULAR PUNITIVISM" 525 D.
EUROSCEPTICISM, AUTHORITARIANISM, AND THE ATTACK ON THE EUROPEAN
CONVENTION 526 2. THE PUBLIC REACTION IN THE UK TO THE CORPUS JURIS
PROJECT, AND THE BIRTH OF "MUTUAL RECOGNITION" 527 3. THE UK'S OFFICIAL
POSITION IN RESPONSE TO EU "MUTUAL RECOGNITION" INSTRUMENTS, ACTUAL AND
PROPOSED 528 4. THE IMPLEMENTATION IN THE UNITED KINGDOM OF THE FIRST
FOUR EU "MUTUAL RECOGNITION" MEASURES ADOPTED AFTER TAMPERE 530 A.
COUNCIL FRAMEWORK DECISION 2002/584/JHA OF 13 JUNE 2002 ON THE EUROPEAN
ARREST WARRANT AND THE SURRENDER PROCEDURES BETWEEN MEMBER STATES 531 B.
COUNCIL FRAMEWORK DECISION 2003/577/JHA OF 22 JULY 2003 ON THE EXECUTION
IN THE EUROPEAN UNION OF ORDERS FREEZING PROPERTY OR EVIDENCE 536 C.
COUNCIL FRAMEWORK DECISION 2006/783/JHA OF 6 OCTOBER 2006 ON THE
APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION TO CONFISCATION
ORDERS 537 D. COUNCIL FRAMEWORK DECISION 2005/214/JHA OF 24 FEBRUARY
2005 ON THE APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION TO
FINANCIAL PENALTIES 539 5. THE UK'S POLICY TOWARDS MUTUAL RECOGNITION IN
CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS: A BRIEF EVALUATION 540 6. HOW WELL, IN PRACTICE,
IS MUTUAL RECOGNITION WORKING IN THE UK? 541 7. THE CURRENT STATE OF
INFORMED OPINION IN THE UK ON THE FUTURE OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION 543 A. IS
"MUTUAL RECOGNITION" A GOOD THING, OR A BAD THING? 543 B. "MUTUAL TRUST"
543 C. THE "DUAL CRIMINALITY" ISSUE 544 D. THE ATTITUDE TOWARDS POSSIBLE
NEW "MUTUAL RECOGNITION" INSTRUMENTS 545 E. THE NEED FOR "FLANKING
MEASURES" 547 F. HAS MUTUAL RECOGNITION REACHED ITS LIMITS? 547 TABLE OF
CONTENTS 603 G. WOULD IT BE DESIRABLE TO PUT ALL THE DIFFERENT "MUTUAL
RECOGNITION" INSTRUMENTS TOGETHER INTO ONE SINGLE INSTRUMENT? 548 QUEL
FUTUR POUR LA RECONNAISSANCE MUTUELLE EN MATIERE PENALE ? ANALYSE
TRANSVERSALE GISELE VERNIMMEN-VAN TIGGELEN ET LAURA SURANO 549 1.
INTRODUCTION 549 2. BILAN DE L'ACQUIS 549 A. OU EN EST-ON DE LA
REALISATION DU PROGRAMME DE RECONNAISSANCE MUTUELLE ? 549 B.
RECONNAISSANCE MUTUELLE ET DIFFERENCES DE DROIT SUBSTANTIEL 553 C.
RECONNAISSANCE MUTUELLE ET DIFFERENCES DE DROIT PROCEDURAL 557 D.
RECONNAISSANCE MUTUELLE ET DIFFERENCES ENTRE SYSTEMES JUDICIAIRES 561 E.
RECONNAISSANCE MUTUELLE ET COMPETENCE JURIDICTIONNELLE 562 F.
RECONNAISSANCE MUTUELLE ET TRAITEMENT DES NATIONAUX 565 G. QUESTIONS
METHODOLOGIQUES 566 3. CONCLUSIONS ET PROPOSITIONS POUR L'AVENIR DE LA
RECONNAISSANCE MUTUELLE EN MATIERE PENALE DANS L'UE 569 A. RAPPROCHEMENT
DU DROIT MATERIEL ET POLITIQUE PENALE DE L'UE 569 B. DROITS INDIVIDUELS
ET GARANTIES PROCEDURALES 570 C. RECUEIL DE LA PREUVE : ASSISTANCE
MUTUELLE ET ADMISSIBILITE 573 D. CONFLITS DE JURIDICTION, NON BIS IN
IDEM ET TRANSFERT DE PROCEDURES 575 E. METHODES DE NEGOCIATION, DE
TRANSPOSITION, DE MISE EN *UVRE ET D'EVALUATION 577 F. MESURES PRATIQUES
D'ACCOMPAGNEMENT : FORMATION ET MISE EN RESEAU 580 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
583 LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS 589 TABLE OF CONTENTS 591 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV035979310 |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | KJC3800 |
| callnumber-raw | KJC3800 |
| callnumber-search | KJC3800 |
| callnumber-sort | KJC 43800 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)436637933 (DE-599)BSZ311533124 |
| dewey-full | 345 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 345 - Criminal law |
| dewey-raw | 345 |
| dewey-search | 345 |
| dewey-sort | 3345 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| edition | 3. éd. |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV035979310</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20100504</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">100127s2009 xx |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9782800414522</subfield><subfield code="c">(pbk.) : 30,00 EUR</subfield><subfield code="9">978-2-8004-1452-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)436637933</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BSZ311533124</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield><subfield code="a">fre</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KJC3800</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">345</subfield><subfield code="2">1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The future of mutual recognition in criminal matters in the European Union</subfield><subfield code="b">= L' avenir de la reconnaissance mutuelle en matière pénale dans l'Union européenne</subfield><subfield code="c">ed. by Gisèle Vernimment-Van Tiggelen ... [Contributors: Silvia Adamo ...]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">L' avenir de la reconnaissance mutuelle en matière pénale dans l'Union européenne</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">3. éd.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Bruxelles</subfield><subfield code="b">Éd. de l'Université de Bruxelles</subfield><subfield code="c">2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">603 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Études européennes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Criminal jurisdiction</subfield><subfield code="z">Europe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Criminal jurisdiction</subfield><subfield code="z">European Union countries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Criminal law</subfield><subfield code="z">Europe</subfield><subfield code="x">International unification</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Criminal law</subfield><subfield code="z">European Union countries</subfield><subfield code="x">International unification</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judgments, Foreign</subfield><subfield code="z">Europe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judgments, Foreign</subfield><subfield code="z">European Union countries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judicial assistance</subfield><subfield code="z">Europe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judicial assistance</subfield><subfield code="z">European Union countries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Mitgliedsstaaten</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4170174-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Strafrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4057795-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Strafverfahren</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4116634-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsvereinheitlichung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048849-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Europa</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5098525-5</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Mitgliedsstaaten</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4170174-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Strafrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4057795-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Strafverfahren</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4116634-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Rechtsvereinheitlichung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048849-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vernimmen- van Tiggelen, Gisèle</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Adamo, Silvia</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">SWB Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=018873249&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-018873249</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Europa Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten |
| geographic_facet | Europa Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten |
| id | DE-604.BV035979310 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2025-01-02T11:29:22Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9782800414522 |
| language | English French |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-018873249 |
| oclc_num | 436637933 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-12 |
| physical | 603 S. |
| publishDate | 2009 |
| publishDateSearch | 2009 |
| publishDateSort | 2009 |
| publisher | Éd. de l'Université de Bruxelles |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Études européennes |
| spelling | The future of mutual recognition in criminal matters in the European Union = L' avenir de la reconnaissance mutuelle en matière pénale dans l'Union européenne ed. by Gisèle Vernimment-Van Tiggelen ... [Contributors: Silvia Adamo ...] L' avenir de la reconnaissance mutuelle en matière pénale dans l'Union européenne 3. éd. Bruxelles Éd. de l'Université de Bruxelles 2009 603 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Études européennes Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd rswk-swf Criminal jurisdiction Europe Criminal jurisdiction European Union countries Criminal law Europe International unification Criminal law European Union countries International unification Judgments, Foreign Europe Judgments, Foreign European Union countries Judicial assistance Europe Judicial assistance European Union countries Mitgliedsstaaten (DE-588)4170174-4 gnd rswk-swf Strafrecht (DE-588)4057795-8 gnd rswk-swf Strafverfahren (DE-588)4116634-6 gnd rswk-swf Rechtsvereinheitlichung (DE-588)4048849-4 gnd rswk-swf Europa Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 b Mitgliedsstaaten (DE-588)4170174-4 s Strafrecht (DE-588)4057795-8 s Strafverfahren (DE-588)4116634-6 s Rechtsvereinheitlichung (DE-588)4048849-4 s DE-604 Vernimmen- van Tiggelen, Gisèle Sonstige oth Adamo, Silvia Sonstige oth SWB Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=018873249&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | The future of mutual recognition in criminal matters in the European Union = L' avenir de la reconnaissance mutuelle en matière pénale dans l'Union européenne Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd Criminal jurisdiction Europe Criminal jurisdiction European Union countries Criminal law Europe International unification Criminal law European Union countries International unification Judgments, Foreign Europe Judgments, Foreign European Union countries Judicial assistance Europe Judicial assistance European Union countries Mitgliedsstaaten (DE-588)4170174-4 gnd Strafrecht (DE-588)4057795-8 gnd Strafverfahren (DE-588)4116634-6 gnd Rechtsvereinheitlichung (DE-588)4048849-4 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)5098525-5 (DE-588)4170174-4 (DE-588)4057795-8 (DE-588)4116634-6 (DE-588)4048849-4 |
| title | The future of mutual recognition in criminal matters in the European Union = L' avenir de la reconnaissance mutuelle en matière pénale dans l'Union européenne |
| title_alt | L' avenir de la reconnaissance mutuelle en matière pénale dans l'Union européenne |
| title_auth | The future of mutual recognition in criminal matters in the European Union = L' avenir de la reconnaissance mutuelle en matière pénale dans l'Union européenne |
| title_exact_search | The future of mutual recognition in criminal matters in the European Union = L' avenir de la reconnaissance mutuelle en matière pénale dans l'Union européenne |
| title_full | The future of mutual recognition in criminal matters in the European Union = L' avenir de la reconnaissance mutuelle en matière pénale dans l'Union européenne ed. by Gisèle Vernimment-Van Tiggelen ... [Contributors: Silvia Adamo ...] |
| title_fullStr | The future of mutual recognition in criminal matters in the European Union = L' avenir de la reconnaissance mutuelle en matière pénale dans l'Union européenne ed. by Gisèle Vernimment-Van Tiggelen ... [Contributors: Silvia Adamo ...] |
| title_full_unstemmed | The future of mutual recognition in criminal matters in the European Union = L' avenir de la reconnaissance mutuelle en matière pénale dans l'Union européenne ed. by Gisèle Vernimment-Van Tiggelen ... [Contributors: Silvia Adamo ...] |
| title_short | The future of mutual recognition in criminal matters in the European Union |
| title_sort | the future of mutual recognition in criminal matters in the european union l avenir de la reconnaissance mutuelle en matiere penale dans l union europeenne |
| title_sub | = L' avenir de la reconnaissance mutuelle en matière pénale dans l'Union européenne |
| topic | Europäische Union (DE-588)5098525-5 gnd Criminal jurisdiction Europe Criminal jurisdiction European Union countries Criminal law Europe International unification Criminal law European Union countries International unification Judgments, Foreign Europe Judgments, Foreign European Union countries Judicial assistance Europe Judicial assistance European Union countries Mitgliedsstaaten (DE-588)4170174-4 gnd Strafrecht (DE-588)4057795-8 gnd Strafverfahren (DE-588)4116634-6 gnd Rechtsvereinheitlichung (DE-588)4048849-4 gnd |
| topic_facet | Europäische Union Criminal jurisdiction Europe Criminal jurisdiction European Union countries Criminal law Europe International unification Criminal law European Union countries International unification Judgments, Foreign Europe Judgments, Foreign European Union countries Judicial assistance Europe Judicial assistance European Union countries Mitgliedsstaaten Strafrecht Strafverfahren Rechtsvereinheitlichung Europa Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=018873249&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT vernimmenvantiggelengisele thefutureofmutualrecognitionincriminalmattersintheeuropeanunionlavenirdelareconnaissancemutuelleenmatierepenaledanslunioneuropeenne AT adamosilvia thefutureofmutualrecognitionincriminalmattersintheeuropeanunionlavenirdelareconnaissancemutuelleenmatierepenaledanslunioneuropeenne AT vernimmenvantiggelengisele lavenirdelareconnaissancemutuelleenmatierepenaledanslunioneuropeenne AT adamosilvia lavenirdelareconnaissancemutuelleenmatierepenaledanslunioneuropeenne |