The international law of investment claims:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge [u.a.]
Cambridge Univ. Press
2009
|
| Ausgabe: | 1. publ. |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Contributor biographical information Publisher description Table of contents only Inhaltsverzeichnis Klappentext |
| Beschreibung: | LXVII, 616 S. |
| ISBN: | 9781107411364 9780521855679 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV035557449 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20150128 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 090610s2009 xxu |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 010 | |a 2009007335 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781107411364 |9 978-1-107-41136-4 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780521855679 |9 978-0-521-85567-9 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)286433575 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV035557449 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a xxu |c US | ||
| 049 | |a DE-703 |a DE-19 |a DE-739 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a K3830 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 346.07 | |
| 084 | |a PR 2353 |0 (DE-625)139576: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a PU 1555 |0 (DE-625)139930: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Douglas, Zachary |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The international law of investment claims |c Zachary Douglas |
| 246 | 1 | 3 | |a Investment claims |
| 250 | |a 1. publ. | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge [u.a.] |b Cambridge Univ. Press |c 2009 | |
| 300 | |a LXVII, 616 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Recht | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Investments, Foreign (International law) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Investments, Foreign |x Law and legislation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Arbitration and award, International | |
| 856 | 4 | |u http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0906/2009007335-b.html |3 Contributor biographical information | |
| 856 | 4 | |u http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0906/2009007335-d.html |3 Publisher description | |
| 856 | 4 | |u http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0906/2009007335-t.html |3 Table of contents only | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m HBZ Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=017613251&sequence=000004&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Passau - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=017613251&sequence=000006&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Klappentext |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-017613251 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804139205009342464 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | Titel: The international law of investment claims
Autor: Douglas, Zachary
Jahr: 2009
Contents
Foreword — James Crawford poge xxi
Preface xxii
Table of investment cases xxvi
Table of cases of international courts and tribunals li
Table of cases of municipal courts Iviii
Table of appendices lxii
List of abbreviations lxm
1. The juridical foundations of investment treaty arbitration 1
A. Investment treaties and investment treaty arbitration 1
B. The legal character of the investment treaty regime 6
Rule 1. Where the contracting states to an investment treaty have
agreed to a procedure for the judicial settlement of
disputes between an investor and the host state, a claim
advanced by the investor in accordance with such
procedure is its own claim and the national contracting
state of the investor has no legal interest in respect
thereof. 10
Rule 2. The rules of admissibility of diplomatic protection in
general international law are not generally applicable to
the regime for the settlement of disputes between an
investor and the host state created by an investment treaty. 10
A. The beneficiary of investment treaty rights 10
B. The derivative model versus the direct model 11
C. Conclusions on the nature of the investor s rights:
Two alternative direct models 32
2. Applicable laws 39
Rule 3. An investment treaty tribunal has the inherent authority to
characterise the issues in dispute and determine the laws
applicable thereto. 40
vni Contents
A. A complex approach to applicable law in
investment disputes 40
B. The source of the choice of law rules 44
C. Characterisation 45
D. The issue in dispute 47
E. An incidental question 50
Rule 4. The law applicable to an issue relating to the existence or
scope of property rights comprising the investment is the
municipal law of the host state, including its rules of
private international law. 52
A. Property rights and the municipal law of the host state 52
B. The fallacy of municipal laws as facts before an
investment treaty tribunal 69
Rule 5. The law applicable to the issue of whether the claimant s
property rights constitute a protected investment is the
investment treaty. 72
Rule 6. The law applicable to an issue relating to the jurisdiction
of the tribunal and admissibility of claims and
counterclaims is the investment treaty and, where
relevant, the ICSID Convention. 74
Rule 7. The law applicable to the issue of whether the claimant is
a national of a contracting state is the investment treaty
and the municipal law of that contracting state. 77
Rule 8. The law applicable to the issue of whether a legal entity
has the capacity to prosecute a claim before an
investment treaty tribunal is the lex societatis. 78
Rule 9. The law applicable to the issue of whether the host state
is the proper respondent to the claim is the law
governing the obligation forming the basis of the claim. 79
Rule 10. The law applicable to the issue of liability for a claim
founded upon an investment treaty obligation is the
investment treaty as supplemented by general
international law. 81
Rule 11. The law applicable to an issue relating to a claim
founded upon a contractual obligation, tort or
restitutionary obligation, or an incidental question
relating thereto, is the law governing the contract, tort or
restitutionary obligation in accordance with generally
accepted principles of private international law. 90
Rule 12. The law applicable to an issue relating to the
consequences of the host state s breach of an investment
treaty obligation is to be found in a sui generis regime of
state responsibility for investment treaties. 94
Contents ix
A. The notion of a distinct regime of state responsibility 94
B. Content of the distinct regime of international
responsibility created by investment treaties 96
Rule 13. The law applicable to an issue relating to the procedure
of the arbitration is the investment treaty, the applicable
arbitration rules, and, in some cases, the law of the seat
of the arbitration. 106
A. The role of the seat of the arbitration 106
B. Sovereign immunity from jurisdiction and
arbitrations involving states 110
C. Sovereign immunity and investment treaty arbitration 113
D. State practice on the legal character of investment
treaty arbitrations 115
E. The relevance of the procedural law in practice 120
F. ICSID arbitrations 120
Rule 14. The choice of law rules set out in this chapter are
compatible with Article 42( 1) of the ICSID Convention. 125
A. Article 42(1) of the ICSID Convention and the
choice of law rules in this chapter 125
3. Taxonomy of preliminary issues relating to jurisdiction and
admissibility in investment treaty arbitration 134
Rule 15. For an investment treaty tribunal to proceed to adjudge
the merits of claims arising out of an investment, it must
have jurisdiction over the parties and the claims, and the
claims submitted to the tribunal must be admissible. 135
A. The investment as the quid pro quo for the
application of the treaty 135
B. The distinction between investment claims and
investor claims 136
C. A taxonomy of preliminary issues 141
Rule 16. An investment treaty tribunal is vested with adjudicatory
power (jurisdiction) if a national of one contracting state
has acquired an investment in another contracting state
in accordance with Rule 22 to Rule 24 and the host state
of the investment has consented to the arbitration of
investment disputes in accordance with Rule 20 and
Rule 21. 143
A. The existence of adjudicative power. The host
state s consent and the investment. Jurisdiction 143
Rule 17. The material, personal and temporal scope of an
investment treaty tribunal s adjudicatory power
x Contents
(jurisdiction) over claims relating to an investment is
determined in accordance with Rule 25 to Rule 42. 144
A. The scope of the adjudicative power. Jurisdiction 144
Rule 18. A decision concerning whether a claim qualifies for
present determination (admissibility) by an international
treaty tribunal having adjudicatory power (jurisdiction),
whether it is expressed as with or without prejudice to the
possible revival of that claim, is a decision on the merits
insusceptible of review beyond that which is available to
decisions on the merits generally. 146
A. The exercise of the adjudicative power. Admissibility 146
Rule 19. If a tribunal has elected to make a preliminary ruling
on issues relating to its jurisdiction or the admissibility
of claims, then such issues must be determined
conclusively by the tribunal in its preliminary decision.
This is subject to the exception relating to the tribunal s
ratione materiae jurisdiction in Rule 27 and Rule 28. 149
4. Consent to the arbitration of investment disputes 151
Rule 20. The host contracting state party must have consented to
the arbitration of investment disputes with a claimant
having the nationality of another contracting state party
pursuant to the provisions of the investment treaty and,
where relevant, the ICSID Convention. Such consent
must be valid at the time the arbitration proceedings are
commenced. 151
Rule 21. In addition to the acquisition of an investment in the host
contracting state party pursuant to Rule 22 and Rule 23,
the claimant must have satisfied any conditions
precedent to the consent of the host contracting state
party to the arbitration of investment disputes as
stipulated in the investment treaty. 151
A. The scope of issues relating to consent 151
5. Investment 161
A. Introduction to the concept of an investment 161
Rule 22. The legal materialisation of an investment is the
acquisition of a bundle of rights in property that has the
characteristics of one or more of the categories of an
investment defined by the applicable investment treaty
where such property is situated in the territory of the host
Contents xi
state or is recognised by the rules of the host state s
private international law to be situated in the host state or
is created by the municipal law of the host state. 170
A. Applicable laws 170
B. The territorial connection with the host state 171
C. A bundle of rights in property 172
D. The categories of investments 175
Rule 23. The economic materialisation of an investment requires
the commitment of resources to the economy of the host
state by the claimant entailing the assumption of risk in
expectation of a commercial return. 189
A. The importance of certainty 190
B. Commitment of resources to the economy of the
host state 191
C. Elements of the Salini test not retained in Rule 23 198
Rule 24. Where the claimant relies upon a contract to establish an
investment pursuant to Rule 22 and Rule 23, the tribunal
should differentiate between rights in personam as
between the contracting parties and rights in rem that are
memorialised by the contract. The rights in personam do
not generally qualify as an investment independently of
the rights in rem. 202
A. The importance of distinguishing rights in rem and
rights in personam 202
B. Consequential errors produced by a failure to
characterise investment rights 207
C. The provisions of investment treaties 224
6. Jurisdiction ratione materiae 233
Rule 25. In accordance with the terms of the contracting state
parties consent to arbitration in the investment treaty,
the tribunal s jurisdiction ratione materiae may extend
to claims founded upon an investment treaty obligation,
a contractual obligation, a tort, unjust enrichment, or a
public act of the host contracting state party, in respect of
measures of the host contracting state party relating to
the claimant s investment. 234
A. Investment treaty provisions on the scope of
consent to arbitration 234
B. Jurisdiction over contractual claims 236
C. Measure of the host contracting state party 240
xji Contents
D. The nexus between the measure and the
investment: relating to ... 242
E. Claimant s investment 248
F. Investment treaties with limited consent to
arbitration 250
Rule 26. In accordance with the terms of the contracting state
parties consent to arbitration in the investment treaty,
the tribunal s jurisdiction ratione materiae may extend
to counterclaims by the host contracting state party
founded upon a contractual obligation, a tort, unjust
enrichment, or a public act of the host contracting state
party, in respect of matters directly related to the
investment. 255
A. The significance of the consent to arbitration and
the applicable arbitration rules 256
B. The requisite nexus between the counterclaim and
the investment 260
Rule 27. For the purposes of Rule 25 and Rule 26, the legal
foundation of the claims submitted to the tribunal must
be objectively determined by the tribunal in ruling upon
the scope of its jurisdiction ratione materiae in a
preliminary decision. 263
A. The importance of an objective test 263
B. The judgments of the International Court of Justice 265
C. Investment treaty precedents confirming the
objective test 266
D. Investment treaty precedents upholding a
subjective test 267
Rule 28. The test for the legal foundation of a claim for the
purposes of Rule 27 is whether the facts alleged by the
claimant in support thereof are prima facie capable of
sustaining a finding of liability on the part of the host
state by reference to the legal obligation invoked in
support of the claim. 273
Rule 29. Where the host state party s consent to arbitration is
stipulated in an investment agreement rather than in an
investment treaty, then, subject to the terms of the
arbitration clause, the tribunal s jurisdiction ratione
materiae may extend to claims founded upon an
international obligation on the treatment of foreign
nationals and their property in general international law,
an applicable investment treaty obligation, a contractual
obligation, a tort, unjust enrichment or a public act of the
Contents xiii
host state party in respect of measures of the host state
relating to the claimant s investment. 277
A. The relevance of the legal instrument containing
the arbitration clause 277
7. Jurisdiction rationepersonae 284
Rule 30. The tribunal s jurisdiction ratione personae extends to
one of the contracting state parties and to an individual
or legal entity (the claimant ) which has the nationality
of another of the contracting state parties in accordance
with the relevant provision in the investment treaty and
the municipal law of that contracting state party and,
where applicable, Article 25 of the ICSID Convention. 285
A. The nationality of individuals and legal entities 285
Rule 31. The claimant must have had the relevant nationality at
the time of the alleged breach of the obligation forming
the basis of its claim and continuously thereafter
until the time the arbitral proceedings are commenced. 290
Rule 32. The claimant must have had control over the investment
in the host contracting state party at the time of the
alleged breach of the obligation forming the basis of its
claim. There is no requirement of continuous control
over the investment until the time that arbitration
proceedings are commenced or thereafter. 297
A. No requirement of continuous control 297
B. The concept of control 299
Rule 33. If an investment treaty stipulates that the investment can
be held directly or indirectly by the claimant, then it is
immaterial that the investment is held through an
intermediate legal entity with the nationality of a third
state. 310
Rule 34. The claimant must have capacity to sue in accordance
with its personal law or, in the case of a legal entity, the
lex societatis, at the time arbitration proceedings are
commenced. 312
Rule 35. Subject to an express provision to the contrary in an
investment treaty, a claimant legal entity having the
nationality of a contracting state party need not have
substantial connections with that contracting state party.
Ergo, there is no requirement that the capital invested by
the claimant originates from the claimant or another legal
entity or individual with the nationality of the claimant. 313
Xiv Contents
A. No requirements of substantial connection or
origin of capital 314
B. Subject to an express provision to the contrary in
an investment treaty 317
Rule 36. The tribunal s jurisdiction ratione personae may extend
to a legal entity having the nationality of the host
contracting state party where such legal entity is under
the control of an individual or legal entity in Rule 30, in
accordance with an express provision in an investment
treaty or by application of Article 25(2)(b) of the ICSID
Convention. 318
Rule 37. Where an individual claimant with the nationality of one
contracting state also has the nationality of the host
contracting state party, the tribunal s jurisdiction ratione
personae extends to such an individual only if the
former nationality is the dominant of the two, subject to
a contrary provision of an investment treaty or the
application of Article 25 of the ICSID Convention. 321
Rule 38. The rules for the nationality of claims in the general
international law of diplomatic protection do not apply
to issues of nationality in investment treaty arbitration. 323
A. The irrelevance of rules of diplomatic protection to
investment treaty arbitration 323
B. The International Law Commission s Draft
Articles on Diplomatic Protection 325
8. Jurisdiction ratione temporis 328
Rule 39. The tribunal s jurisdiction ratione temporis extends to
claims relating to the claimant s investment, which are
founded upon obligations in force and binding upon the
host contracting state party at the time of the alleged
breach. 328
A. The intertemporal rule in relation to obligations 329
B. Relating to the claimant s investment 336
Rule 40. The tribunal s jurisdiction in Rule 39 may be limited to
investment disputes which have arisen after the
investment treaty has entered into force, in accordance
with an express provision of the investment treaty. 336
Rule 41. The claimant s investment in Rule 39 can have been
made before or after the investment treaty entered into
force, subject to an express provision to the contrary in
the investment treaty. 340
Contents xv
Rule 42. Without prejudice to Rule 39, a tribunal can take into
account facts relating to the claim but occurring prior to
the tribunal s jurisdiction ratione temporis provided
that those facts are not relied upon as constituent
elements of the breach of the obligation forming the
basis of the claim. 341
A. Facts occuring prior to the tribunal s jurisdiction
ratione temporis 342
9. The obligation to accord most-favoured-nation treatment
and the jurisdiction of an investment treaty tribunal 344
Rule 43. A most-favoured-nation (MFN) clause in the basic
investment treaty does not incorporate by reference
provisions relating to the jurisdiction of the arbitral
tribunal, in whole or in part, set forth in a third
investment treaty, unless there is an unequivocal
provision to that effect in the basic investment treaty. 344
A. Introduction 344
B. The precedents of the International Court
ofJustice 345
C. The false question 356
D. No incorporation by reference of provisions of a
third treaty dealing with jurisdiction 360
E. Unless there is an unequivocal provision to that
effect in the basic investment treaty 362
10. Admissibility: Contractual choice of forum 363
A. The importance of preserving the efficacy of
contractual choice of forum clauses 363
B. Lessons from the Calvo Clause litigation 366
Rule 44. Where the tribunal has determined pursuant to Rule 27
and Rule 28 that the legal foundation of the claim is an
investment treaty obligation, and the object of that claim
is the vindication of contractual rights forming part of the
claimant s investment, and there is a bonafide dispute
concerning the existence or scope of those rights, then
the tribunal should generally stay its jurisdiction
otherwise established in accordance with Rule 25 to Rule
29 in favour of a judicial or arbitral forum stipulated in
the contract as having exclusive jurisdiction in relation to
disputes arising out of the contract. 370
xvi Contents
A. Where the tribunal has determined pursuant to
Rule 27 and Rule 28 that the legal foundation of
the claim is an investment treaty obligation... 370
B. .. .the object of that claim is the vindication of
contractual rights forming part of the claimant s
investment 371
C. .. .there is a bonafide dispute concerning the
existence or scope of those [contractual] rights 372
D. ... in favour of a judicial or arbitral forum
stipulated in the contract as having exclusive
jurisdiction in relation to the disputes arising out
of the contract 375
E. .. .the tribunal should generally stay its
jurisdiction otherwise established in accordance
with Rule 25 to Rule 29 378
Rule 45. Where the tribunal has determined pursuant to Rule 27
and Rule 28 that the legal foundation of the claim is a
contractual obligation, the tribunal should decline its
jurisdiction otherwise established in accordance with
Rule 25 to Rule 29 in favour of a judicial or arbitral
forum stipulated in the contract as having exclusive
jurisdiction in relation to disputes arising out of the
contract. 393
Rule 46. Without prejudice to Rule 44 and Rule 45, the tribunal
should exercise its jurisdiction over the claim if the
tribunal is satisfied on the basis of compelling evidence
that the claimant will be subjected to a denial of justice
in the forum stipulated in the contract. 394
11. Admissibility: Shareholder claims 397
A. Introduction to the principle of admissibility for
shareholder claims 398
B. The Barcelona Traction case 403
Rule 47. A claim founded upon an investment treaty obligation
which seeks a remedy for the interference by the host
state contracting party with the rights attaching to a
shareholding in a company having the nationality of
the host state is admissible. 407
A. Rights attaching to a shareholding 407
Rule 48. A claim founded upon an investment treaty obligation
which seeks a remedy for the breach by the host state
contracting party of undertakings or representations
Contents xvii
made to the shareholder but not to the company, or such
a claim for other types of loss that are separate and
distinct from the company s loss, is admissible. 414
A. Undertakings or representations made to
shareholders 414
B. Shareholder claims for types of loss that are
separate and distinct from the company s loss 415
Rule 49. A claim founded upon an investment treaty obligation
which seeks a remedy for the diminution of value of a
shareholding in a limited liability company having the
nationality of the host contracting state party is
admissible if the claimant can establish a prima facie
case that: (i) the assets of the company have been
expropriated by the host contracting state party so that
the shareholding has been rendered worthless; or (ii)
the company is without or has been deprived of a
remedy to redress the injury it has suffered; or (iii) the
company is without or has been deprived of the
capacity to sue either under the lex societatis or de
facto; or (iv) the company has been subjected to a
denial of justice in the pursuit of a remedy in the system
for the administration of justice of the host contracting
state party. 415
A. Introduction 416
B. First limb of Rule 49: Expropriation of the assets
of the company 425
C. Second limb of Rule 49: Deprivation of a remedy
for the company 427
D. Third limb of Rule 49: Deprivation of the
company s capacity to sue 428
E. Fourth limb of Rule 49: Denial of justice in the
pursuit of a remedy by the company 430
F. Inadmissible shareholder claims for reflective loss 430
G. The special case of the European Convention on
Human Rights 444
H. The special case of NAFTA 446
I. Relevant provisions of investment treaties and the
ICSID Convention 451
J. The special case of the Iran/US Claims Tribunal 453
Rule 50. For a claim to be admissible pursuant to Rule 49, the
tribunal should satisfy itself that the shareholder s
claim will not: (i) unfairly expose the host state or the
company to a multiplicity of actions; (ii) materially
xviii Contents
prejudice the interests of the creditors of the company;
or, (iii) interfere with a fair distribution of the recovery
among all interested parties. 455
12. Admissibility: Dispositions relating to the legal and beneficial
ownership of the investment 458
A. Diplomatic protection and investment treaty
arbitration distinguished 458
Rule 51. The legal or beneficial ownership of an investment can
be structured in such a way so as to attract the
protection of an investment treaty in force at the host
state of the investment. 460
Rule 52. The legal or beneficial ownership of an investment
cannot be transferred in order to establish the
jurisdiction of an investment treaty tnbunal in respect
of an alleged injury to that investment attributable to
measures of the host state save where the host state has
given its express consent to such a transfer on notice of
this consequence. 461
Rule 53. Dispositions relating to the legal and beneficial
ownership of the investment that occur after the
claimant has validly filed a notice of arbitration have
no effect upon the admissibility of its claims. 466
13. Admissibility: Denial of Benefits 468
Rule 54. Where a denial of benefits provision is successfully
invoked by the host state in arbitration proceedings
against the claimant, the substantive protection of the
investment treaty is denied to the claimant and its
claims must be dismissed as inadmissible. 468
Appendices 473
1. Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between
States and Nationals of Other States (1965) - ICSID (excerpts) 473
2. Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign
Arbitral Awards (1958) 481
3. North American Free Trade Agreement (1992) - NAFTA (excerpts) 486
4. Energy Charter Treaty (1994) (excerpts) 509
5. China Model BIT (1997) 525
6. France Model BIT (2006) 532
7. Germany Model BIT (2005) 539
Contents xix
8. Netherlands Model BIT (1997) 547
9. Turkey Model BIT (2000) 553
10. United Kingdom Model BIT (2005, with 2006 amendments) 559
11. United States of America Model BIT (2004) 568
Index 600
■ -
f
Є
!
The International
Lau)
of Investment Claims
Џ
the first comprehensive account of the
distinct principles governing the prosecution of a claim in investment treaty
tration.
1ће
principles are codified as
54
rules of general application covering
tfcté
juridical foundations of investment treat} arbitration, the jurisdiction of the tribunal,
the
àdmissibilíty
of claims and the laws applicable to different aspects of the invest¬
ment dispute. The commentary to each proposed rule conwns a critical analysis of
the investment treaty jurisprudence and makes extensive reference to the decisions
of other international courts and tribunals, as well as to the relevant experience of
;
!
municipal legal systems. Solutions are elaborated in respect of the most intracrable
problems that have arisen in the cases, including; the effect of an exclusive jurisdic-
;
tion
clause in an investment agreement with the host state; reliance an the most-
1
favoured-nation clause in relation
w
jurisdictional provisions; and, the legitimate
І
scope of derivative claims by shareholders.
,·
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Douglas, Zachary |
| author_facet | Douglas, Zachary |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Douglas, Zachary |
| author_variant | z d zd |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV035557449 |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | K3830 |
| callnumber-raw | K3830 |
| callnumber-search | K3830 |
| callnumber-sort | K 43830 |
| callnumber-subject | K - General Law |
| classification_rvk | PR 2353 PU 1555 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)286433575 (DE-599)BVBBV035557449 |
| dewey-full | 346.07 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 346 - Private law |
| dewey-raw | 346.07 |
| dewey-search | 346.07 |
| dewey-sort | 3346.07 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| edition | 1. publ. |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02072nam a2200469 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV035557449</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20150128 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">090610s2009 xxu |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2009007335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781107411364</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-107-41136-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780521855679</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-521-85567-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)286433575</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV035557449</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxu</subfield><subfield code="c">US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-703</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K3830</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">346.07</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PR 2353</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139576:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PU 1555</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139930:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Douglas, Zachary</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The international law of investment claims</subfield><subfield code="c">Zachary Douglas</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Investment claims</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1. publ.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge Univ. Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">LXVII, 616 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Recht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Investments, Foreign (International law)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Investments, Foreign</subfield><subfield code="x">Law and legislation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Arbitration and award, International</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0906/2009007335-b.html</subfield><subfield code="3">Contributor biographical information</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0906/2009007335-d.html</subfield><subfield code="3">Publisher description</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0906/2009007335-t.html</subfield><subfield code="3">Table of contents only</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">HBZ Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=017613251&sequence=000004&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Passau - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=017613251&sequence=000006&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Klappentext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-017613251</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV035557449 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T21:40:23Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781107411364 9780521855679 |
| language | English |
| lccn | 2009007335 |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-017613251 |
| oclc_num | 286433575 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-703 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-739 |
| owner_facet | DE-703 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-739 |
| physical | LXVII, 616 S. |
| publishDate | 2009 |
| publishDateSearch | 2009 |
| publishDateSort | 2009 |
| publisher | Cambridge Univ. Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Douglas, Zachary Verfasser aut The international law of investment claims Zachary Douglas Investment claims 1. publ. Cambridge [u.a.] Cambridge Univ. Press 2009 LXVII, 616 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Recht Investments, Foreign (International law) Investments, Foreign Law and legislation Arbitration and award, International http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0906/2009007335-b.html Contributor biographical information http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0906/2009007335-d.html Publisher description http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0906/2009007335-t.html Table of contents only HBZ Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=017613251&sequence=000004&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung UB Passau - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=017613251&sequence=000006&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Klappentext |
| spellingShingle | Douglas, Zachary The international law of investment claims Recht Investments, Foreign (International law) Investments, Foreign Law and legislation Arbitration and award, International |
| title | The international law of investment claims |
| title_alt | Investment claims |
| title_auth | The international law of investment claims |
| title_exact_search | The international law of investment claims |
| title_full | The international law of investment claims Zachary Douglas |
| title_fullStr | The international law of investment claims Zachary Douglas |
| title_full_unstemmed | The international law of investment claims Zachary Douglas |
| title_short | The international law of investment claims |
| title_sort | the international law of investment claims |
| topic | Recht Investments, Foreign (International law) Investments, Foreign Law and legislation Arbitration and award, International |
| topic_facet | Recht Investments, Foreign (International law) Investments, Foreign Law and legislation Arbitration and award, International |
| url | http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0906/2009007335-b.html http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0906/2009007335-d.html http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0906/2009007335-t.html http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=017613251&sequence=000004&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=017613251&sequence=000006&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT douglaszachary theinternationallawofinvestmentclaims AT douglaszachary investmentclaims |