Društvena udaljenost od Roma: etničko-religijski okvir
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Niš
Univ., Fil. Fak. [u.a.]
2007
|
| Ausgabe: | 1. izd. |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Abstract |
| Beschreibung: | In kyrill. Schr., serb. |
| Beschreibung: | 242 S. |
| ISBN: | 9788673791234 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV035540345 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20090615 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 090527s2007 |||| 00||| srp d | ||
| 020 | |a 9788673791234 |9 978-86-7379-123-4 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)644958704 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV035540345 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a srp | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a 7,41 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Todorović, Dragan |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Društvena udaljenost od Roma |b etničko-religijski okvir |c Dragan Todorović |
| 250 | |a 1. izd. | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Niš |b Univ., Fil. Fak. [u.a.] |c 2007 | |
| 300 | |a 242 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a In kyrill. Schr., serb. | ||
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Roma |g Volk |0 (DE-588)4050473-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Ethnosoziologie |0 (DE-588)4220302-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Soziale Distanz |0 (DE-588)4327376-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Serbien |0 (DE-588)4054598-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Serbien |0 (DE-588)4054598-2 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Soziale Distanz |0 (DE-588)4327376-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Roma |g Volk |0 (DE-588)4050473-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Ethnosoziologie |0 (DE-588)4220302-8 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSBMuenchen |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=017596408&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=017596408&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Abstract |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-017596408 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804139180094128128 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | САДРЖАЈ
РЕЧАУТОРА
.........................................................................9
ПРЕДГОВОР
Друштвена
удаљеност
од Рома
-
покушај интпердисциплинарног проучавања
(Драгољуб Б.
Ђорђевић)
....................................................
li
УВОД
ЕТНИЧКИ, КОНФЕСИОНАЛНИ И
РЕЛИГИЈСКИ
ОДНОСИ НАБАЛКАНУ
.................29
ПРВИДЕО
ТЕОРИЈСКО-МЕТОДОЛОШКИ
ОКВИР
ИСТРАЖИВАЊА
............................................................59
ТЕОРИЈСКИ
ОКВИР
ИСТРАЖИВАЊА
..................
6l
1.
ПОЈМОВНО ОДРЕЂЕЊЕ СОЦИЈАЛНЕ
ДИСТАНЦЕ
.......................................................................61
2.
ПОЈМОВНО ДЕФИНИСАЊЕ
ЧИНИЛАЦА
КОЈИ ОДРЕЂУЈУ СОЦИЈАЛНУ
ДИСТАНЦУ
.......
6д
2.1.
Биолошка група чинилаца
.................................69
2.1.1.
ПОЛ
.................................................................. 69
2.1.2.
Узраст
...........................................................
jo
2.2.
Социјална
група чинилаца
.................................71
2.2.1.
Место
становања
........................................
η
2.2.2.
Образовање
...................................................
72
2.2.3-
Занимање
......................................................72
2.2.4·
Материјални
статус
.................................73
2.3·
Етничко-религијска
група чинилаца
.............73
2.3-1-
Национална
идентификација
....................73
2.3-2.
Конфесионална
идентификација
..............
ηη
2.3-3-
Религијска идентификација
...................... 78
3.
РОМИ
-
ЕТНИЧКА
И ВЕРСКА
МАЊИНА
У
СРБИЈИ, БУГАРСКОЈ
И
МАКЕДОНИЈИ
...........
8о
МЕТОДОЛОШКИ ОКВИР
ИСТРАЖИВАЊА
....... 86
1.
ИЗБОР
ПРОБЛЕМА
ИСТРАЖИВАЊА
...............86
2.
ЗНАЧАЈИСТРАЖИВАЊА
..................................... 99
3. ПРЕДМЕТ,
ЦИЉ
И ЗАДАЦИ
ИСТРАЖИВАЊА
.......................................................... 119
4-
УЗОРАК, ОРГАНИЗАЦИЈА
И ТОК
ИСТРАЖИВАЊА,
МЕТОДЕ, ТЕХНИКЕ И
ИНСТРУМЕНТИ
ИСТРАЖИВАЊА
........................ 119
ДРУГИ
ДЕО
РЕЗУЛТАТИ
ИСТРАЖИВАЊА
-
НАЛАЗ,
АНАЛИЗА И
ИНТЕРПРЕТАЦИЈА
......... 127
НАЛАЗ
..............................................................................129
1.
ФРЕКВЕНЦИЈЕ ЧИНИЛАЦА
KO
ЈИ ОДРЕЂУЈУ
СОЦИЈАЛНУ ДИСТАНЦУ
.........................................129
1.1.
Биолошка
група чинилаца
1.1.1.
ПОЛ
.................................................................129
1.1.2.
Узрастп
..........................................................129
1.2.
Социјална
група чинилаца...............................
130
1.2.1.
Место
становања
......................................
1.2.2.
Образовање
.................................................
1.2.3.
Занимање
.....................................................
іЗі
1.2.4.
Материјални
статус
...............................
іЗЗ
ι.3·
Етничко-религијска
група чинилаца
........... 134
і.З-і.
Национална
идентификаций..................
134
1.3-2.
Конфесионална
идентификација
............ 134
1.3-3-
Религијска идентификација
..................... 135
2.
ФРЕКВЕНЦИ
JA
СОЦИЈАЛНЕ ДИСТАНЦЕ
НАБОГАРДУСОВОЈСКАЛИ
.................................... 136
АНАЛИЗА
........................................................................139
ι.
УКУПНА МЕРА СОНИ
ЈАЛНЕ
ДИСТАНЦЕ
ПРЕМА РОМИМА
.........................................................139
1.1.
Утицај етничко-религијске групе
чинилаца на укупну меру
социјалне
дистанце премаРомима
............................................140
1.1.1.
Утицај националне идентификације
на укупну меру
соццјалне
дистанце према Томима
.. 140
1.1.2.
Утицај конфесионалне идентификације
на укупну меру
социјалне
дистанце према Ромима
... 141
1.1.3-
Упгицај религијске идентификације
на укупну меру
социјалне
дистанце према Ромима
... 141
2.
СОЦИЈАЛНАДИСТАНЦА
ПРЕМА РОМИМА
У
СРБИЈИ, БУГАРСКОЈ
И
МАКЕДОНИЈИ
......... 141
2.1.
Утицај етничко-религијске
групе чинилаца
на
социјалну
дистанцу према Ромима у
Србији,
Бугарској
и Македонией
............................................ 142
2.1.1.
Утицај
националне
идентификације
на
соцџјалну
дистанцу према Ромима у
Србији,
Бугарској
и Македонией
.................................................. 142
2.1.2.
Утицај
конфесионалне
идентификације
на
социјалну
дистанцу према Ромима у
Србији,
Бугарској
u
Македонији
.................................................. 143
2.1.3-
Утицај религијске идентификације
на
социјалну
дистанцу према Ромима у
Србији,
Бугарској
u
Македонији
.................................................. 144
ИНТЕРПРЕТАЦИЈА
....................................................147
1.
РАЗМАТРАЊЕ
РАЗЛИКА
У
УТИЦАЈУ
ЕТНИЧКО-РЕЛИГИЈСКЕ
ГРУПЕ ЧИНИЛАЦА
(НАЦИОНАЛНЕ, КОНФЕСИОНАЛНЕ И
РЕЛИГИЈСКЕ ИДЕНТИФИКАЦИЈЕ)
НА
УКУПНУ МЕРУ
СОЦИЈАЛНЕ
ДИСТАНЦЕ
ПРЕМА РОМИМА
.........................................................150
2.
РАЗМАТРАЊЕ
РАЗЛИКА
У
УТИЦАЈУ
ЕТНИЧКО-РЕЛИГИЈСКЕ ГРУПЕ ЧИНИЛАЦА
(НАЦИОНАЛНЕ, КОНФЕСИОНАЛНЕ
И
РЕЛИГИЈСКЕ ИДЕНТИФИКАЦИЈЕ)
НА
СОЦИ ЈАЛНУ ДИСТАНЦУ ПРЕМА РОМИМА
У
СРБИЈИ, БУГАРСКОЈ
И
МАКЕДОНИЈИ
..........154
3.
РАЗМАТРАЊЕ ПОТЕНЦИЈАЛНЕ
ПОВЕЗАНОСТИ ЕТНИЧКО-РЕЛИГИЈСКЕ
ГРУПЕ ЧИНИЛАЦА
СА
ДЕЈСТВОМ
БИОЛОШКЕ
И
СОЦИЈАЛНЕ ГРУПЕ
ЧИНИЛАЦА НА СОЦИ
ЈАЛ
НУ ДИСТАНЦУ
ПРЕМА РОМИМА
.........................................................165
ЗАКЉУЧАК
....................................................................
1б7
ПРИЛОГ
.......................................................................... 176
ЛИТЕРАТУРА
.................................................................199
SUMMARY
...................................................................... 229
ИМЕНСКИ РЕГИСТАР
............................................... 235
ПРЕДМЕТНИ
РЕГИСТАР
..........................................239
БЕЛЕШКА О АУТОРУ
.................................................243
РЕЧАУТОРА
Књига
пред вама
јесте делимично прерађена
и
до¬
пушена
верзија
магистарског рада
Утицај етничко-рели-
гијских чинилаца
на
социјалну дистанцу према Ромима ,
одбрањеног
на емеру
Социологија религије
на
Филозоф-
ском
факултеїу
Универзитета
у Нишу
јануара 2оо6.
го¬
дине, пред
комисијом
у саставу: проф. др Никола Божи-
ловић,
ментор, проф.
др Драгољуб
Б.
Ђорђевић, председ-
ник,
проф. др
Љубиша Митровић
и доц. др
Данијела
Га¬
врилові.
Потрудио
сам се да добронамерне препоруке чла-
нова
комисије
за
побољшање
рада
максимално
уважим,
те да га иновирам
новопојављеним
подацима и литерату-
ром. Разуме се, за евентуалне пропусте одговорност
je
на
аутору.
Захваљујем
свом брату
Зорану
Тодоровићу-Тодо-
ру, академском сликару из Смедеревске Паланке, на ли-
ковном
решењу
и
пријатељу Небојши Ђорђевићу
(нишки
Studio
Quattro),
на графичком
обликовању
корица
књиге.
Посебно
захваљујем
проф. др
Драгољубу
Б.
Ђорђе-
вићу
на
предговору, али
и на
вишегодишњој професио-
налној
и
пријатељској
бризи за
моје социолошко израс-
тање.
У Нишу,
јануара
2007.
SUMMARY
The research of ethnic and social distance is very de¬
veloped in domestic sociology and social psychology. Nikola
Rot was the first to lay the foundations, and the practice was
continued in
Novi Sad
owing to
Đorđe Đurić
and the Depart¬
ment of Sociology. In the last
10
years, the Department of
Sociology at the Faculty of Philosophy in
Niš
has devoted
considerable attention to the study of social distance.
The M. A. thesis The Influence of ethnic-religious
factors on the social distance toward Roma , defended
-
be¬
fore the commission comprising: Prof. Nikola
Božilović,
me¬
ntor, Prof.
Dragoljub
В.
Đorđević,
president, Prof.
Ljubiša
Mitrović
and assistant professor
Danijela Gavrilović
-
at the
Department
of Sociology of Religion at the Faculty of Philo¬
sophy in
Niš
in January
2006,
was written as part of the imp¬
lementation of a four-year project Cultural and Ethnic Rela¬
tionships in the Balkans
-
Possibilities for Regional and Eu¬
ropean Integration
(2002-2005)
of the Institute for Sociolo¬
gy of the Faculty of Philosophy, the University of
Niš.
The pro¬
ject was financed by the Ministry of Science and Environmen¬
tal Protection of the Republic of Serbia.
In the second half of the year
2003
a comparative em¬
pirical research, The Quality of Interethnic Relationships,
the Awareness of Regional Identity and Possibilities of Colla¬
boration and Integration in the Balkans , was carried out on
a sample of
1,786
interviewees.
The sample was fragmented into three subsamples
with the identical number of interviewees, each subsample
representing the territory of Southeast Serbia, Northwest
Macedonia and central and west Bulgaria respectively. The
collation of the empirical data was accomplished in five dist¬
ricts of Southeast Serbia (the
Nišava
District, the
Toplica
Dis¬
trict, the Pirot District, the Jablanica District and the
Pčinja
District), three municipalities of Northwest Macedonia (Sko¬
plje, Tetovo and Kumanovo) and two districts in central and
west Bulgaria
(Sumen
and
Veliko
Turnovo). In these regions
Драган
Тодоровић
the sample included the majority population and members of
the following three minority ethnic groups: Roma, Albanians
and Bulgarians in Serbia; Roma, Albanians and Serbs in Ma¬
cedonia; Roma, Turks and Vlachs.
The overall measure of the social distance of the non-
Roma population toward Roma of Bulgaria and Macedonia
was calculated by the addition of the interviewees answers on
the seven-degree
Bogardus
social distance scale. More precise¬
ly, the overall measure of the social distance was obtained by
calculating the arithmetic average among positive, negative
and neutral answers: each positive answer was allocated one
point, each neutral answer was allocated two points, and each
negative answer was allocated three points.
In selecting the subject, I was governed by three factors:
1. The real-sociological incitement: a) the Balkan mu¬
lticultural region subsumes a multitude of nations and religi¬
ons, diverse cultural layers and traditions, which make it a
unique phenomenon in Europe; b) Serbia, Bulgaria and Ma¬
cedonia are neighbouring countries with an equally distribu¬
ted ethnic and religious blend; c) according to unofficial esti¬
mates, there are approximately
1,5
million members of the
Romani
national minority living in Serbia, Bulgaria and Ma¬
cedonia.
2.
The scientific incitement (sociology of religion): a)
national and religious affiliation in the Balkans has always
been a unique compound; b) a distinctive Balkan speciality
was an almost full convergence of the said affiliations to the
extent that referring to one nation implied its religion and
confession, whereas referring to a religion/confession was
automatically linked to a specific nation; c) contemporary in-
tereligious and interconfessional relationships are no longer
based upon uniformity and religious
exclusivism;
rather,
they are based upon understanding and respect for different
religious and confessional affiliations.
The pragmatic incitement: a) a database compiled upon
the completion of the comparative empirical research The Qu¬
ality of Interethnic Relationships, the Awareness of Regional
230
Друштвена удаљеност
од
Рома
Identity and Possibilities of Collaboration and Integration in
the Balkans of the Institute for Sociology of the Faculty of
Philosophy, the University of
Niš;
Serbia and Montenegro s
joining the international project The Decade of Roma Inclu¬
sion
2005-2015,
officially declared on February, 2nd
2005
in
Sofia (Bulgaria).
Almost a decade devoted to the study of religion and
religious and ethnic minorities, first of all Roma, prompted
me to approach the given subject from the point of view of
two sociological subdisciplines
-
sociology of religion and so¬
ciology of Roma (that is, Romology), thereby making my M.
A. thesis a result not only of multidisciplinarity, but rather
interdisciplinarity, which is a more demanding undertaking.
From a myriad of analyzed data, three global conclu¬
sions are pointed out:
The social distance toward Roma in Serbia, Bulgaria
and Macedonia according to national affiliation
From the group of ethnic-religious factors which aff¬
ect the social distance toward Roma, national identification
stands out. As regards the afore-mentioned countries, Serbs
stand out in Serbia, Bulgarians in Bulgaria
-
they being the
majority peoples, whereas in Macedonia the majority people
are more open to collaboration, and Serbs and Albanians,
who also belong to minority peoples, stand out.
Consequently, a polarized situation in the three coun¬
tries has been created. Lulled into their safety as the majority
peoples, Serbs and Bulgarians are reluctant to treat minority
groups, in this case Roma
-
a very specific and neglected mi¬
nority group in the Balkans
-
in a more receptive, or more
precisely, multicultural and
intercultural
manner.
The situation is inversely proportional in Macedonia:
the majority people is favourable to Roma; however, they are
less tolerated by members of other peoples who share the
equal minority status.
231
Драган
Тодоровић
The social distance toward Roma in Serbia, Bulgaria
and Macedonia according to confessional affiliation
From the confessional point of view, Muslims in Ser¬
bia and Bulgaria display a higher degree of tolerance toward
Roma. The number of Muslims in the research varies bet¬
ween one fifth and one quarter of the total number of intervi¬
ewees,
60%
of them being urban residents. The previous fin¬
dings, confirmed in practice and throughout the history, whi¬
ch assert that Roma in the Balkans are traditionally Muslims
most frequently residing in urban enviroment, speak in favo¬
ur of such a fact.
Nonetheless, what gives rise to concern are negative
answers of the Orthodox population, which shuns religious
affiliation; admittedly, the answers correlate with the establi¬
shed national profile, according to which the majority peop¬
les, Serbs and Bulgarians, which are predominantly Ortho¬
dox, maintain a less neigbourly relationship toward Roma.
Commendations aimed at Islam do not hold for Ma-
cedodnia, due to the previously registered hostility of the Al¬
banian minority, which does not regard Roma as good Mu¬
slims, even when they really are or aspire to be good. Fore
this reason, confessional divergences in the case of this coun¬
try are statistically irrelevant if compared to social distance.
The social distance toward Roma in Serbia, Bulgaria
and Macedonia according to religiosity
While the importance of the statistics of the intervie¬
wees national and confessional traits fluctuates, the compa¬
rison among arithmetic averages on the religious level does
not label religiosity as a staple in the creation of social dis¬
tance toward Roma in the three countries in the Balkans.
Variations in the three countries are statistically irre¬
levant, to the point that we do not have to juxtapose, for exa¬
mple, religious people with non-religious or religiously neut¬
ral ones, and declare religious affiliation a contributing factor
in the social distance toward Roma.
232
Друштвена удаљеност
од Рома
At the end of the thesis, I took the liberty to offer the
state, social institutions and religious communities a modest
personal view of specific measures whose implementation
might bring about the reduction of the social distance toward
Roma.
The proposed scheme would be the following:
NATIONAL IDENTITY
1. THE STATE
1.1
The Constitution
1.2
Laws
1.2.1.
Law of National Minorities
1.2.2.
Law of Antidiscrimination
1.2.3.
Law of Human Rights and Minority Rights
1.2.4.
Law of
Ombudsmans
1.2.5.
Law of Local Self-management
2.
SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS
2.1.
Education
2.2
Mass media
2.3
Non-Government sector
2.4
Voluntary work
3.
PILLARS OF ETHNOS
1.1.
Academy
1.2.
University
1.3.
Church
RELIGIOUS-CONFESSIONAL IDENTITY
1.
CHRISTIANITY
2.
ORTHODOXY
3.
ORTHODOX CHURCHES
3.1.
Creation of commissions and bodies for the
missionary work among Roma
3.2.
Translation of the Bible
3.3.
Education of priesthood
3.4.
Religious service in the
Romani
language
233
Драган
Тодоровић
It is only with the above-mentioned social actors acti¬
vely carrying out the proposed measures that one can circu¬
mspectly propound the idea of interculturalism as a new
process of social integration.
In a practical, everyday life, it turns out that the co¬
existence of two different cultures is not enough. Intercultu-
ral society is the one in which we live and create not one next
to another, but rather one with another and one for another.
Contemporary Balkan societies are facing a transition
from the multicultural to the intercultural, that is, the expa¬
nsion and adoption of the idea and practise of intercultura¬
lism in a multicultural community, or, more precisely, the
development of the concept of a cultural and educational po¬
licy which will raise the level of respect for cultural diversity
and steer the course toward the creation of a society in which
different cultures interweave.
The authorized state institutions of Serbia, Bulgaria
and Macedonia are to grapple with a decade of hard work on
laying genuine political, social-economic and cultural foun¬
dations for the full social integration of Roma.
By continually enlightening the majority population
on the features of
Romani
ethos, reasons for the social dis¬
tance toward them shall graually cease to exist and their sta¬
tus as equal citizens shall be affirmed. Moreover, concrete
political actions shall help raise the level of education, hou¬
sing conditions and economic power. The Roma shall have
their say by ensuring their equal representation on all levels of
decision-making and by their active role in the public sphere.
All this is meant to spread the idea among the majori¬
ty peoples, according to which, as formulated by the Serbian
romologist
Dragoljub
В.
Đorđević,
coexisting with an ethni¬
cally, racially, religiously, culturally different individual is an
advantage and a fortune, rahter than a detriment to be fou¬
ght against .
234
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Todorović, Dragan |
| author_facet | Todorović, Dragan |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Todorović, Dragan |
| author_variant | d t dt |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV035540345 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)644958704 (DE-599)BVBBV035540345 |
| edition | 1. izd. |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01792nam a2200421 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV035540345</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20090615 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">090527s2007 |||| 00||| srp d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9788673791234</subfield><subfield code="9">978-86-7379-123-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)644958704</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV035540345</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">srp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">7,41</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Todorović, Dragan</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Društvena udaljenost od Roma</subfield><subfield code="b">etničko-religijski okvir</subfield><subfield code="c">Dragan Todorović</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1. izd.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Niš</subfield><subfield code="b">Univ., Fil. Fak. [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="c">2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">242 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In kyrill. Schr., serb.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Roma</subfield><subfield code="g">Volk</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4050473-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ethnosoziologie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4220302-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Soziale Distanz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4327376-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Serbien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4054598-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Serbien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4054598-2</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Soziale Distanz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4327376-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Roma</subfield><subfield code="g">Volk</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4050473-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Ethnosoziologie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4220302-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSBMuenchen</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=017596408&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=017596408&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-017596408</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Serbien (DE-588)4054598-2 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Serbien |
| id | DE-604.BV035540345 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T21:39:59Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9788673791234 |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-017596408 |
| oclc_num | 644958704 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 242 S. |
| publishDate | 2007 |
| publishDateSearch | 2007 |
| publishDateSort | 2007 |
| publisher | Univ., Fil. Fak. [u.a.] |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Todorović, Dragan Verfasser aut Društvena udaljenost od Roma etničko-religijski okvir Dragan Todorović 1. izd. Niš Univ., Fil. Fak. [u.a.] 2007 242 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier In kyrill. Schr., serb. Roma Volk (DE-588)4050473-6 gnd rswk-swf Ethnosoziologie (DE-588)4220302-8 gnd rswk-swf Soziale Distanz (DE-588)4327376-2 gnd rswk-swf Serbien (DE-588)4054598-2 gnd rswk-swf Serbien (DE-588)4054598-2 g Soziale Distanz (DE-588)4327376-2 s Roma Volk (DE-588)4050473-6 s Ethnosoziologie (DE-588)4220302-8 s DE-604 Digitalisierung BSBMuenchen application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=017596408&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=017596408&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Abstract |
| spellingShingle | Todorović, Dragan Društvena udaljenost od Roma etničko-religijski okvir Roma Volk (DE-588)4050473-6 gnd Ethnosoziologie (DE-588)4220302-8 gnd Soziale Distanz (DE-588)4327376-2 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4050473-6 (DE-588)4220302-8 (DE-588)4327376-2 (DE-588)4054598-2 |
| title | Društvena udaljenost od Roma etničko-religijski okvir |
| title_auth | Društvena udaljenost od Roma etničko-religijski okvir |
| title_exact_search | Društvena udaljenost od Roma etničko-religijski okvir |
| title_full | Društvena udaljenost od Roma etničko-religijski okvir Dragan Todorović |
| title_fullStr | Društvena udaljenost od Roma etničko-religijski okvir Dragan Todorović |
| title_full_unstemmed | Društvena udaljenost od Roma etničko-religijski okvir Dragan Todorović |
| title_short | Društvena udaljenost od Roma |
| title_sort | drustvena udaljenost od roma etnicko religijski okvir |
| title_sub | etničko-religijski okvir |
| topic | Roma Volk (DE-588)4050473-6 gnd Ethnosoziologie (DE-588)4220302-8 gnd Soziale Distanz (DE-588)4327376-2 gnd |
| topic_facet | Roma Volk Ethnosoziologie Soziale Distanz Serbien |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=017596408&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=017596408&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT todorovicdragan drustvenaudaljenostodromaetnickoreligijskiokvir |