Verfügbarkeit: Ka demokratskom društvu

Ka demokratskom društvu: sloboda javnog okupljanja, pravo svih

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser:	Mršević, Zorica 1954- (VerfasserIn)
Format:	Buch
Veröffentlicht:	Beograd Inst. Društvenih Nauka 2007
Schlagworte:	Javna zborovanja - Spolna orientiranost - Geografski pregled Javna zborovanja - Spolna orientiranost - Zgodovinski pregled Javna zborovanja - Človekove pravice Menschenrecht Gesellschaft Versammlungsfreiheit Demokratie
Online-Zugang:	Inhaltsverzeichnis Abstract
Beschreibung:	Zsfassung in engl. Sprache u.d.T.: Towards a democratic society ...
Beschreibung:	163 S.
ISBN:	9788670931213

Internformat

MARC


LEADER	00000nam a2200000 c 4500
001	BV035447228
003	DE-604
005	20090422
007	t
008	090422s2007 \|\|\|\| 00\|\|\| srp d
020			\|a 9788670931213 \|9 978-86-7093-121-3
035			\|a (OCoLC)450814192
035			\|a (DE-599)BVBBV035447228
040			\|a DE-604 \|b ger \|e rakwb
041	0		\|a srp
049			\|a DE-12
080			\|a 316.35
084			\|a 7,41 \|2 ssgn
100	1		\|a Mršević, Zorica \|d 1954- \|e Verfasser \|0 (DE-588)1171251483 \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Ka demokratskom društvu \|b sloboda javnog okupljanja, pravo svih \|c Zorica Mršević
264		1	\|a Beograd \|b Inst. Društvenih Nauka \|c 2007
300			\|a 163 S.
336			\|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|b n \|2 rdamedia
338			\|b nc \|2 rdacarrier
500			\|a Zsfassung in engl. Sprache u.d.T.: Towards a democratic society ...
650		4	\|a Javna zborovanja - Spolna orientiranost - Geografski pregled
650		4	\|a Javna zborovanja - Spolna orientiranost - Zgodovinski pregled
650		4	\|a Javna zborovanja - Človekove pravice
650	0	7	\|a Menschenrecht \|0 (DE-588)4074725-6 \|2 gnd \|9 rswk-swf
650	0	7	\|a Gesellschaft \|0 (DE-588)4020588-5 \|2 gnd \|9 rswk-swf
650	0	7	\|a Versammlungsfreiheit \|0 (DE-588)4063146-1 \|2 gnd \|9 rswk-swf
650	0	7	\|a Demokratie \|0 (DE-588)4011413-2 \|2 gnd \|9 rswk-swf
689	0	0	\|a Demokratie \|0 (DE-588)4011413-2 \|D s
689	0	1	\|a Gesellschaft \|0 (DE-588)4020588-5 \|D s
689	0	2	\|a Versammlungsfreiheit \|0 (DE-588)4063146-1 \|D s
689	0		\|5 DE-604
689	1	0	\|a Versammlungsfreiheit \|0 (DE-588)4063146-1 \|D s
689	1	1	\|a Menschenrecht \|0 (DE-588)4074725-6 \|D s
689	1		\|5 DE-604
856	4	2	\|m Digitalisierung BSBMuenchen \|q application/pdf \|u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=017367355&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA \|3 Inhaltsverzeichnis
856	4	2	\|m Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen \|q application/pdf \|u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=017367355&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA \|3 Abstract
940	1		\|n oe
999			\|a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-017367355

Datensatz im Suchindex

_version_	1804138896565469184
adam_text	SADRŽAJ IOPŠTIDEO 1. SLOBODA MIRNOG JAVNOG OKUPLJANJA .........................................13 Pojam mirnog okupljanja ............................................../..............................13 Obaveze države ............................................................................................15 Vrste javnih okupljanja i njihovi učesnici ....................................................17 Svrha i priroda javnih okupljanja .................................................................19 2. JAVNO OKUPLJANJE-ZONA MOGUĆNOSTI ......................................21 Tradicija javnog protestovanja .....................................................................21 Parade ponosa i njihovi sadržaji ...................................................................22 Od dekriminalizacije do slobode javnog okupljanja ....................................23 Pitanja identiteta ...........................................................................................25 3. OSNOVNI MEĐUNARODNOPRAVNI OKVIR .........................................27 4. LJUDSKA PRAVA I SEKSUALNA ORIJENTACIJA .................................29 Osnovna prava ..............................................................................................29 (a) Zaštita od državnog i neslužbenog nasilja .........................................29 (b) Sloboda izražavanja, okupljanja i udruživanja ..................................30 (c) Sloboda odraslih ljudi da stupaju u dobrovoljne istopolne seksualne aktivnosti obavljene u privatnosti ...........................................30 Principi iz Džogdžakarte ..............................................................................31 UN Specijalni predstavnik ............................................................................32 Evropski ambijent .........................................................................................34 Antidiskriminacioni program .......................................................................35 Rezolucija о homofobiji u Evropi .................................................................36 Evropska godina jednakih mogućnosti .........................................................38 Rezolucija о slobodi okupljanja i izražavanja Saveta Evrope ......................40 Dosadašnja postignuća u domenu ljudskih prava LGBT osoba ...................40 Zahtevi za unapređivanjem ljudskih prava LGBT osoba .............................41 Kršenje ljudskih prava LGBT osoba ............................................................43 5. ISTORIJA PARADI PONOSA: AMERIKA .................................................45 Polícijska represija tokom pedesetih i početkom šezdesetih........................ 45 Pijuckanje .....................................................................................................46 Pobuna Kamenog zida ..................................................................................47 Analiza stounvolskog scenarija ....................................................................48 Pad igle koji je čuo ceo svet: početak stvaranja tradicije ............................................................................51 6. ISTORIJA PARADI PONOSA: EVROPA ....................................................53 Dan ulice Kristofer .......................................................................................53 Evroponos (EuroPride) .................................................................................54 EPOA... .........................................................................................................56 7. РШК EKONOMIJA ......................................................................................58 Pink simbolika ..............................................................................................58 Razvoj pink tržišta ........................................................................................59 Pink klijentela ...............................................................................................60 Pink industrija ...............................................................................................62 Ekonomski motivisano savezništvo ..............................................................63 Profítabilnost parada ponosa ........................................................................63 a) Atlanta .................................................................................................63 b) Toronto ................................................................................................64 c) Vankuver .............................................................................................64 d) Evroponos ...........................................................................................65 e) Novi Zeland..... ....................................................................................65 Turizam .........................................................................................................66 Londonski model ..........................................................................................67 II POSEBNI DEO - SEZONE PONOSA 1. EVROPSKA SEZONA PONOSA U 2006. GODINI ...................................71 Godina sukoba ..............................................................................................71 Poljska ..........................................................................................................72 a) Krakov .................................................................................................72 b) Varšava ................................................................................................72 Kišinjev ........................................................................................................73 Moskva .........................................................................................................73 Bukurešt ........................................................................................................76 Riga ..............................................................................................................77 Talin ..............................................................................................................78 Komplet alata ................................................................................................78 2. TRADICIONALNA, MASOVNA MIRNA OKUPLJANJA U EVROPI 2007......................................................................80 Madrid 2007: Evroponos ..............................................................................80 Hamburg .......................................................................................................80 .Berlin ............................................................................................................81 London ..........................................................................................................81 Rim .................................................................................. .............................82 Pariz ..............................................................................................................82 Atina .............................................................................................................82 Beč ................................................................................................................83 Valeta ............................................................................................................83 Ljubljana .......................................................................................................83 Amsterdam ...................................................................................................84 Oksford .........................................................................................................86 Kopenhagen ..................................................................................................86 Toršavn, Farská ostrva ..................................................................................87 Londonderi ...................................................................................................88 Rejkjavik ......................................................................................................88 Štokholm ......................................................................................................89 Mančester .....................................................................................................90 3. MIRNA OKUPLJANJA IZVAN EVROPE ..................................................91 Sao Paulo......................................................................................................91 Tokijo ............................................................................................................92 Sidnej ............................................................................................................92 Princ Albert Taun.........................................................................................92 Meksiko Siti .................................................................................................93 Johanesburg ..................................................................................................93 4. OKUPLJANJA UZ TEŠKOĆE ILI POSLE MEĐUNARODNIH INTERVENCIJA .............................................................94 Varšava .........................................................................................................94 Izrael: ponos, uprkos pretnji ...................................................,.....................97 a) Tel Aviv...............................................................................................97 b) Jerusalim .............................................................................................97 Talin..............................................................................................................98 Dani prijateljstva u Rigi ................................................................................99 a) Letonska pravna situacija ..................................................................100 b) Uloga predsednice Letonije ..............................................................101 c) Poruke (i pouke) ovogodišnje parade ................................................102 5. KRŠENJE SLOBODE JAVNOG OKUPLJANJA - KAD POLITIKA PONIŠTI MEĐUNARODNO PRAVO ..............................103 Da li se poštuje či. 11 Evropske konvencije о ljudskim pravima ........................................................................................103 Slučaj Moskva ............................................................................................105 a) Majski sukob .....................................................................................105 b) Prethodni meseci javnih kontroverzi .................................................106 c) Stav ruske Vlade i predsednika .........................................................106 d) Septembarski protest .........................................................................107 e) Oktobarska izjava ruskog patrijarha ..................................................108 Budimpešta: prvi put nasilje na paradi ponosa ...........................................109 Bukurešt: marš ravnopravnosti održan uz incidente ...................................110 Kišinjev: zabrana uprkos odluke Vrhovnog suda .......................................111 a) Odluka Vrhovnog suda Moldavije: Svako ima pravo na koristi pravo na slobodu okupljanja .....................111 b) Gradske vlasti Kišinj eva ponavljaju zabranu ....................................112 c) Javni protest ipak održan ...................................................................112 d) Oktobarska Rezolucija Parlamentarne Skupštine Saveta Evrope .....113 e) Novembarski odgovor Komiteta ministara Skupštini Saveta Evrope ........................................................................114 Litvanija, za sada ne odustaje od zabrane ...................................................115 a) Viljnus, „Dani duge 2007 ................................................................115 b) Oktobarska konferencija ILGA-e u Viljnusu ....................................116 c) Saopštenje Amnesty International-a ..................................................118 Tbilisi ..........................................................................................................118 Zagrebačka „Vidljivosti i pravo na javnost ...............................................119 6. JAVNE AKTIVNOSTI LGBT AKTIVIZMA KOJE NISU PARADE .......123 Novosadski festival „Umetnost radi akcije ...............................................123 Sarajevo ......................................................................................................123 Pink point u Sofiji .......................................................................................124 Kvir skver (Queer Square) Skoplje ............................................................125 7. SRBIJA ........................................................................................................126 Splet loših uspomena i slabe nade ..............................................................126 Medijska prezentacija .................................................................................127 8. ZAKLJUČNE NAPOMENE .......................................................................129 Poštovanje ljudskih prava sa presudom ili bez nje ....................:...............................................................129 LITERATURA .................................................................................................131 Internetei izvori .....................................................................................133 Novinski članci ......................................................................................141 REZIME „KA DEMOKRATSKOM DRUŠTVU - SLOBODA JAVNOG OKUPLJANJA, PRAVO SVIH .................................143 Koncept slobode javnog okupljanja ...........................................................143 Struktura knjige ..........................................................................................144 Zemlje evropske tranzicije ..........................................................................145 Bezbednost javnog okupljanja ....................................................................146 Evropski ambijent .......................................................................................148 Srbija ..........................................................................................................149 SUMMARY „TOWARDS A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY - FREEDOM OF ASSEMBLY, THE RIGHT OF ALL ...................................151 The concept of freedom of public assembly ...............................................151 The make-up of the book ............................................................................152 European countries in transition .................................................................153 Security of public assembly ........................................................................155 European ambiance ....................................................................................156 Serbia ..........................................................................................................158 CONTENT (in English) ...................................................................................159 Bojana Balon je napisala sledeći naslov: Pink ekonomija, str. 58-67 CONTENT I GENERAL PART 1. FREEDOM OF PEACEFULL ASSEMBLY .................................................13 The concept „Freedom of Assembly ..........................................................13 Commitments of the state .............................................................................15 Types of public gatherings and their participants .........................................17 The aim and nature of public gatherings ......................................................19 2. PUBLIC GATHERING-AREA OF POSSIBILITIES ..............................21 Tradition of public protests ...........................................................................21 Gay prides and their content .........................................................................22 From decriminalization to freedom of public assembly ...............................23 The question of identity ................................................................................25 3. BASIC INTERNATIONAL LEGAL FRAMEWORK ..................................27 4. HUMAN RIGHTS AND SEXUAL ORIENTATION ...................................29 Basic rights ...................................................................................................29 a) Protection of state and private violence ..............................................29 b) Freedom of speech, association and assembly ....................................30 c) Freedom of adults to engage in freewill samesex sexual activities in the private ............................................................................................30 Jogyj akarta principles ...................................................................................31 UN Special representative ............................................................................32 European environment experience ...............................................................34 Anti discriminatory program ........................................................................35 Resolution on homophobia in Europe ..........................................................36 European year of equal opportunities ...........................................................38 Resolution on freedom of assembly and speech for lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transgendered persons of the Council of Europe ...................40 Achievements in the domain of human rights of LGBT persons .................40 Demands for the advancement of human rights of LGBT persons ..............41 Violation of human rights f LGBT persons ..................................................43 159 5. HISTORY OF GAY PRIDES: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ...............45 Police repression during the fiftees and beginning of sixties .......................45 Sipping ..........................................................................................................46 Stonewall riot ...............................................................................................47 Analysis of the Stownwall scenario .............................................................48 The fall of the needle that the whole world heard: the beginning of making of a tradition .........................................................51 6. HISTORY OF GAY PRIDES: EUROPE ......................................................53 The day of Christopher Street .......................................................................53 EuroPride ......................................................................................................54 EPOA ............................................................................................................56 7. PINK ECONOMY .........................................................................................58 Pink symbolism ............................................................................................58 The development of pink market ..................................................................59 Pink klients ...................................................................................................60 Pink industry .................................................................................................62 Economically motivated alliance ..................................................................63 Profitability of gay prides ............................................................................63 a) Atlanta ................................................................................................. 63 b) Toronto ................................................................................................64 c) Vancouver ............................................................................................64 d) EuroPride ............................................................................................65 e) New Zealand .......................................................................................65 Tourism .........................................................................................................66 London model ...............................·................................................................67 II SPECIFIC PART - SEASONS OF PRIDE 1. EUROPEAN SEASON OF PRIDE IN 2006.................................................71 The year of clashes .......................................................................................71 Poland ...........................................................................................................72 a) Krakow ................................................................................................72 b) Warsaw ................................................................................................72 Chisinau ........................................................................................................73 Moscow ........................................................................................................73 Bucharest ......................................................................................................76 Riga ..............................................................................................................77 Tallin .............................................................................................................78 Tools .............................................................................................................78 160 2. TRADITIONAL MASS PEACEFULL GATHERINGS IN EUROPE IN 2007........................................................................................80 Madrid 2007: EuroPride ...............................................................................80 Hamburg .......................................................................................................80 Berlin ............................................................................................................81 London ..........................................................................................................81 Rome ............................................................................................................82 Paris ..............................................................................................................82 Athens ...........................................................................................................82 Vienna ...........................................................................................................83 Valletta ..........................................................................................................83 Ljubljana .......................................................................................................83 Amsterdam ...................................................................................................84 Oxford ..........................................................................................................86 Copenhagen ..................................................................................................86 Torshavn, Faroe Islands ................................................................................87 Londonderry .................................................................................................88 Reykjavik ......................................................................................................88 Stockholm .....................................................................................................89 Manchester ...................................................................................................90 3. PEACEFULL GATHERINGS OUTSIDE OF EUROPE ..............................91 Sao Paolo ...................................................... ; ...............................................91 Tokio.............................................................................................................92 Sidney..... ......................................................................................................92 Prince Albert Town .......................................................................................92 Mexico City ..................................................................................................93 Johannesburg ................................................................................................93 4. GATHERINGS WHICH FACED PROBLEMS OR GATHERINGS AFTER INTERNATIONAL INTERVENTIONS .............................................94 Warsaw .........................................................................................................94 Israel: pride, despite threats ..........................................................................97 a) Tel Aviv ...............................................................................................97 b) Jerusalem .............................................................................................97 Tallin .............................................................................................................98 Days of friendship in Riga ............................................................................99 a) Legal situation in Latvia ....................................................................100 b) The role of the president of Latvia ....................................................101 c) Messages (and lessons learnt) of this years pride ..............................102 161 5. VIOLATION OF FREEDOM OF ASSEMBLY - WHEN POLITICS NULLIFIES THE INTERNATIONAL LAW ..................103 Is Article 11 of the European convention on human rights resprected? ..... 103 The case of Moscow ...................................................................................105 a) Clash in May .....................................................................................105 b) Moths full of public controversy .......................................................106 c) The attitude of the Russian Government and the President .............. 106 d) Protest in September .........................................................................107 e) October Statement of the Patriarch of the Russian Orthodox Church ..................................................................... 108 Budapest: first time violence on gay pride ................................................. 109 Bucharest: incidents during equality march ...............................................110 Chisinau: a ban despite the decision of the Supreme Court ....................... Ill a) Decision of the Supreme Court of Moldavia: Everyone has the right to freedom of assembly .................................... HI b) City authorities of Chisinau repeat the ban .......................................112 c) Public protest organized nevertheless ...............................................112 d) October Resolution of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe .................................................................................113 e) November answer of the Committee of Ministers to the CoE Parliamentary Assembly ...............................................................114 Lithuania, does not give up of the ban for now .......................................... 115 a) Vilnius, „Days of a rainbow 2007 ...................................................115 b) October Conference of ILGA in Vilnius ...........................................116 c) Amnesty International Statement ......................................................118 Tbilisi ..........................................................................................................118 Zagreb „Visibility and the right to publicity ............................................. 119 6. PUBLIC ACTIVITIES OF LGBT ACTIVISTS APART FROM PRIDES ..................................................................................123 „Art for Action a Festival in Novi Sad .....................................................123 Sarajevo ......................................................................................................123 Pink point in Sofía ......................................................................................124 Queer Square in Skopje ..............................................................................125 7. SERBIA .....................................................................................................„126 A combination of bad memories and weak hope ........................................126 Media presentation .....................................................................................127 8. FINAL NOTES ............................................................................................129 Respect for human rights with or without sentence ...................................129 162 REFERENCES ................................................................................................131 SUMMARY IN SERBIAN LANGUAGE ......................................................143 SUMMARY IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE ......................................................151 CONTENT (in English) ...................................................................................159 Bojana Balon is the author of the title: Pink economy, pages 58-67 Međunarodni pakt о građanskim i političkim pravima Član 21, Priznaje se pravo na mirno okupljanje. Nikakve restrikcije ne smeju biti stavljene na uživanje ovog prava osim onih koje su u skladu sa zakonom i koje su neophodne u demokratskom društvu u interesima nacionalne i javne bezbednosti, javnog reda, zaštite zdravlja ili morala ili zaštite prava i sloboda drugih. Kopenhagenski dokument [Države učesnice reafirmišu da] svako ima pravo na mirno okupljanje i demonstracije. Svaka restrikcija koja može biti stavljena na uživanje ovih prava će biti propisana zako¬ nom i konzistentná sa međunarodnim standardima. Džogdžakarta Principi zahtevaju da se inter alia zabrani: e. uskraćivanje slobode govora i okupljanja. Odluka Evropskog suda za ljudska prava u Strazburu u slučaju Bačkovski u maju 2007. (Case of Baczkowski and others v. Poland , Application no. 1543/06) Varšavská zabrana održavanja parade ponosa 2005. predstavlja kršenje tri odredbe Evrop¬ ske konvencije о ljudskim pravima, sadržane u članovima 11,13 i 14. U obrazloženju se podvlače vrednosti poštovanja različitosti i dinamike kulturnih tradicija, etničkih i kultur¬ nih identiteta, religioznih uverenja, umetničkih, literarnih i socio-ekonomskih ideja i kon¬ cepata. Harmonična interakcija između lica i grupa sa različitim identitetima je suštinska za postizanje društvene kohezije. Među stubovima demokratskog društva Sud je pridao po¬ sebnu važnost pluralizmu, toleranciji i širini shvatanja. Demokratija ne znači da mišljenje većine mora uvek da preovlađuje. Nužno je postići ravnotežu koja obezbeđuje pošten i ravnopravan tretman manjina i izbegavanje zloupotreba dominantne pozicije. 163 SUMMARY „TOWARDS A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY - FREEDOM OF ASSEMBLY, THE RIGHT OF ALL The book „Towards a Democratic Society - Freedom of Public Assembly, the Right of All was written as part of the Institute of Social Sciences project „Democratic Models of Developing Social Cohesion, Tolerance, Human Rights and Economic Growth in Political and Institutional Processes of the EU Integra¬ tionin Serbia . The project is to be financed by the Ministry of Science of the Government of the Republic of Serbia in the period from 2006 to 2010. It is a second publication under the title of „Towards a Democratic Society , which fo¬ cuses on some current, perhaps still controversial, aspects of development of the Serbian society in the context of the Serbian society s need for inevitable changes and reforms in the EU integration process.263 The points at issue here are topics that are essentially determined by the social, political and legal framework of the EU integration process. Changes and the development of democratic models of social and political cohesion are studied here, as well as the models of democratic institutional development in the conditions of poverty, growing inequality, politi¬ cal instability and a changed understanding of the concept of human rights. The¬ refore, the general topics discussed in the publication are integrative elements of the participatory democracy, the processes of social cohesion of marginalised gro¬ ups, models of political behaviour and the building of public trust in institutions as well as the inclusion of citizens in the institutional network. The concept of freedom of public assembly The starting idea of the book is appreciation of the freedom of peaceful assembly as one of the foundations of a fimctional democracy. The freedom of public assembly has a symbolic and instrumental importance and may be an im¬ portant moment in the preservation and development of culture and identity of minorities. It complements other rights and freedoms, such as the freedom of 263 The first publication from the series: Towards a Democratic Society: „The System of Election Quotas , which was published in the spring of 2007. A book on religious liberties is also planned. 151 assembly, the right to communicate, the freedom of expression, thought, consci¬ ence and faith. As such, the freedom of public assembly is fundamentally impor¬ tant for personal development, dignity and the fulfilment of every individual, as well as for the advancement of any democratic society. The freedom of peaceful assembly is also acknowledged as one of the foun¬ dations of a functional democracy, while its protection is the key for developing a tolerant society in which groups with different beliefs, practices or policies can peacefully coexist. Public protest against discrimination and a demand for equality are the com¬ ponents of a regular and traditional democratic mechanism for advancing human rights of those social groups whose rights as systematically violated, despite the existing legal and political guaranties. At the beginning of the 20th century, mil¬ lions of people marched requesting the voting right for women. The middle of the 20th century was marked by mass protests against racial discrimination. The pu¬ blic hasn t stopped demanding the advancement of women s rights and the rights of minorities since then. Today, at the beginning of the 21st century, the most numerous and doub¬ tlessly the loudest public and regular annual voicing of support for the advance¬ ment of human rights and against discrimination are pride marches (parades). They are traditionally held all over the world, while they have been held in some countries for over 10 years. Even though they gather around one million partici¬ pants, pride marches in most countries, the so-called „old democracies , are sim¬ ply a peaceful, carnival-like event, which is attractive for tourists, organisers and the cities where they are held. They are a very profitable form of expressing pro¬ test against discrimination, which still occurs in the public life. Pride parades are essentially peaceful and as such they aren t a provocation. The make-up of the book The book is divided into the General and Specific Part. The General Part encompasses the definition of concepts and international legal framework, as well as the definition of a specific context of human rights that are related to sexual orientation. Also included is the historical overview of the beginnings of pride parades in America and Europe. The historical overview is especially important, since the limitations of human rights resurfaced from the darkness of the past and gained a new life in some of the European countries in transition. The Specific Part deals with an analysis of specific „seasons of pride parades, mostly of those held in the European cities in 2006 and 2007. Developments in 2O06, when pride parades were banned in many East Euro¬ pean countries, were analysed. The year 2005 was marked by clashes in Warsaw, 152 while in 2006, problems caused by pride parades appeared in Moscow, Riga, Tallinn, Bucharest and other cities. In 2006, the lines of confrontation emerged in several cities. The opposing sides clearly identified themselves and ideologies were adopted across the dividing line. An important section of the book is dedicated to an analysis of different examples that illustrate peaceful gatherings in 2007, such as parades organised in the European cities of Madrid, Hamburg, Berlin, London, Rome, Paris, Athens, Vienna, Valetta, Ljubljana, Amsterdam, Oxford, Copenhagen, Torshavn (Faroe Islands), Londonderry, Reykjavik, Stockholm and Manchester. Also included are some examples from outside of Europe, such as pride parades organised in Sao Paolo, Tokyo, Sidney, Mexico City and Johannesburg. Presented as contrasting examples are the cases of violence that occurred at parades held in 2007 in Budapest, Bucharest, Chisinau, Vilnius, Tbilisi and espe¬ cially in Moscow. Separately presented are the examples of Warsaw, Jerusalem, Tallinn and Riga, which prove that incidents can be easily prevented and held under control successfully, so that the safety of participants isn t threatened. To accomplish this, a direct political support is needed, as well as an unambiguous political condemnation of threats of violence against parade participants. While pride marches in the countries of the so-called old democracies are nowadays mostly carnival-like and a profitable attraction for tourists, organizers of parades in the East European countries in transition, starting from Warsaw, through Riga, Tallinn and Bucharest to Moscow, still come under attack and face severe political rejection, violence and arrests. Pride parades are banned and the „right to traditional values is passionately defended. European countries in transition One of the main motives for writing this book was the existence of clashes, violence, bans, political confrontations and public rejection of the rights of non- heterosexuals to publically gather and express their orientation in the European countries in transition, most of which are the newly accepted EU members. The¬ refore, the concept of freedom of assembly becomes the central concept in the negotiations that are on the crossroads of a modern understanding of respect of the basic human rights and freedoms and of the still unrelenting discrimination that is based on sexual orientation. Pride parades (marches), thus, became the central concept of opposition. Even though pride parades are a way of publicly communicating sexual orientation, which is something essentially private, their message is a public call to the authorities to offer protection öom violence and discrimination, which should never remain private. It is important to stress that pride parades aren t about „promotion of homosexuality , as it is sometimes in- 153 correctly understood, but about a legitimate public demand for the respect of hu¬ man rights and a justified protest against discrimination of sexual minorities. The entire situation needs to be perceived in the context of the existing clashes among the authoritarian and newly established democratic tendencies in those countries. Attacks on sexual minorities aren t individual problems because the point at issue is the government s strong and systematic resistance to the achi¬ evement of real transition to modern democracy and to the adoption of its values, such as the respect of everyone s human rights, tolerance and diversity. In this conflict, sexual minorities are a direct and easy target. However, they re also a proof that transition from the old to the new isn t understood and accepted everywhere in the same way. While elections became more or less fair, the main problems that remain are control over the media by the government, as well as restrictions of the freedom of public assembly. The authorities paradigmatically think that democracy is achieved and completed by legalisation of the forces which were banned during communism, for instance of the ultranationaliste and religio¬ us fundamentalists, while the acknowledging of human rights to sexual minoriti¬ es (as well as to religious, national and some other minorities) is still denied by a large political consensus. Homophobia is a public attitude which has a big politi¬ cal support, from the extreme right-wing to the moderate political centre. The European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg decided that in case of Backovski from May 2007, the ban of the Warsaw pride parade in 2005 was a violation of three provisions öf the European Convention on Human Rights. In explanation of the Decision, the values of the respect of diversity and dynamics of cultural traditions, ethnic and cultural identities, religious beliefs, artistic, lite¬ rary and socio-economic ideas and concepts are stressed. A harmonic interaction between persons and groups with different identities is crucial for the achieve¬ ment of social cohesion. Speaking of the pillars of democratic society, the Court particularly stressed the importance of pluralism and tolerance. In this context, it is stipulated that it s necessary for democracy to achieve the balance that guaran¬ tees a fair and equal treatment of minorities and the avoidance of misuse of the majority s dominant position. The decision of the Strasbourg Court is a precedent/test ruling for the legal proceedings which are run before the same court against the decision of the Mo¬ scow, Riga and Chisinau authorities not to allow pride parades. Besides the ru¬ lings of the Strasbourg Court, countries in which pride parades were inadequately protected by the government, such as Latvia, Estonia, Moldavia and Poland, were exposed to severe political pressures of the Council of Europe and the European Union, as well as to the pressures of specific European countries. 154 Security of public assembly There is nothing controversial about theoretical acknowledgement and re¬ spect of freedom of assembly, and there is no political, ideological or any other public concept which would be based on arguments and would oppose the essen¬ ce of freedom of public gathering. This is true as long as such a right is requested by persons of homosexual orientation, when, in the European countries in transi¬ tion, the whole story gets a controversial character, and when the issue of public safety becomes the most serious one and most often used. As if there isn t a pu¬ blic event which wouldn t carry serious security risks, starting from sports events, through election manifestations and gatherings, to celebrations of sporting victo¬ ries, to mention only some regular events on the Serbian public scene. Not one of them passes without minor or larger incidents, let alone the material damage. These manifestations aren t banned for security reasons. Also, highly risky gat¬ herings of politicians, such as the G8 summit and NATO summits, aren t cancel¬ led due to security risks and millions of dollars are spent on ensuring only the fundamental safety of the participants. Numerous activities are incorporated in the concept of „freedom of public gathering - including static events, such as strikes, meetings, group activities, public addresses, protests, sitting protests, demonstrations during which specific places are occupied, as well as „moving events and demonstrations, such as walks, parades, funerals, weddings, pilgrimages... As a rule, all these public events are a risk to public order. The government s responsibility is to provide adequate mec¬ hanisms and procedures for ensuring that freedom of assembly is enjoyed in prac¬ tice. The government must protect participants in a peaceful assembly from any person or group that would try to prevent it in any way, including provocations and counter-demonstrations. It is crucial to understand that freedom of peaceful assembly needs to be enjoyed by everyone equally and that the authorities aren t allowed to discrimi¬ nate against any individual or group on any grounds, such as race, language, religion, political or any other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth, sexual orientation or any other status. It is underscored that gatherings during which controversial, provocative or irritating topics are discussed and where attitudes that are in contrast to the attitu¬ des of the majority population are expressed, are also considered peaceful. Pro¬ test gatherings are most often organized for the purpose of changing the attitudes and much less for the purpose of expressing general and widely accepted views. The existence of conflicting attitudes of representatives of the minority, which organises a protest, in relation to the attitudes of the majority, isn t something which would threaten the peaceful character of a public gathering. 155 The government s duty to protect a peaceful assembly is especially impor¬ tant when those who try to organise a gathering support an unpopular attitude, since this may increase the likelihood of a break-out of violent resistance. Nevert¬ heless, the potential violence and unrest, which is expected due to hostility to¬ wards those who take part in a peaceful protest, can t be easily used as a universal justification of prevention of or imposition of restrictions on public gatherings. Unrests, which were, at the beginning of 2000, occurring more and more frequently in an increasing number of the European cities in transition, don t diminish the essential peacefulness of those public gatherings and they even less diminished their legitimacy. The problem exists on the „other side , among those who represent a wide networked resistance and where the state isn t ready to demonstrate its commitments regarding securing the safety and security of public gatherings. European ambiance The world in which LGBT human rights are systematically violated is the world in which no one can feel safe and free. LGBT identities and practices exi¬ sted and continued to exist in each and every culture and part of the world. They are a continuous part of the universal human existence. That s why the first and basic priority is to preserve and protect the basic rights of LGBT persons, the rights which are well-founded in the international legal obligations and which are in no way legally controversial. The main ways in which LGBT persons human rights are violated in Euro¬ pe are those regarding the problems with organising and holding pride parades, which are a denial of the freedom of peaceful assembly. Also included here are attacks on and a lack of protection of LGBT human rights activists, as well as a lack of adequate protection from them regarding gay bashing or group attacks on individual homosexuals. In view of the above, it sometimes seems that Europe is much more tolerant towards homophobia then towards its victims. They are the only minority that is left to protect its own rights. The points at issue here aren t only the rights of gay and lesbian persons, but the problem is much bigger, since human rights and the rule of law can t be implemented in a society that allows intolerance, prejudice and hatred. An increase in extreme attitudes towards homosexuals in several new EU countries came under criticism of the European Parliament, from where an initia¬ tive originated that any claim on the dangers of „homosexualisation of society must be considered as an equivalent to racist and anti-Semitic statements on the alleged Jewish conspiracy to achieve domination of the world. Homophobic cla¬ ims are absurd in the same way, and they are equally paranoid and dangerous. At 156 the beginning of the 21st century, equality also means elimination of discrimina¬ tion on the grounds of sexual orientation. In this way, homophobia is strongly condemned in the EU member countries and by the European institutions and the EU member countries. Countries that are candidates for the EU membership are called upon to urgently discontinue the current processes of discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and to promote the protection of everyone s human rights that refer to their sexual orientation. The economic aspect of the problems with social, legal and political posi¬ tion of homosexuals is very important and it becomes noticeable when pride para¬ des are in question. It is acknowledged that times changed as a result of changes in the law, political climate and the understanding of the importance of protection of homosexual persons human rights. This caused a change in the pink industry, which turned from an exploiter and an added discriminator into an ally and a financier of various activities related to the protection and advancement of homo¬ sexual persons human rights. Economic interests or the logic of a „pink euro relentlessly identified pink clients as allies the in the context of the legal econo¬ mic activities intended for legal homosexual activities, which are possible only in the system of legally regulated protection of their human rights. The protection of homosexual persons human rights became an economically motivated necessity. It was pointed out that the most carrerally drawn up laws won t be suffici¬ ent for rooting out discrimination unless there is a clear political will and public support behind them. That s why the year 2007 was proclaimed the European year of equal opportunities under the slogan of 4Rs (rights, representation, re¬ spect and recognition). Although it seems that some things irreversibly changed, for instance that it s generally accepted that the value and dignity of every human being is a central part of the philosophy of universality of human rights, interna¬ tional activities, local activism and state guarantees are still needed, so that the value and dignity of all individuals in the world could be maintained. On October 6,2007, ILGA-Europe published a Toolkit, which is a publica¬ tion that includes the ideas, information and instructions on how to organize a pride parade in a hostile environment. The toolkit is a reply to the violent and hostile resistance to the first lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender pride events in some Eastern and Central European countries over the past few years. The text is based on the experience and successes of the organizers of pride parades. This is combined with the information on the support of the European institutions and LGBT international community. The goal is to support and con¬ solidate the thus-far achieved progress, as well as to acquire the initial „know- how , which would be used by those who want to arrange pride parades in their countries and cities, where such events were never held. 157 Serbia The question of freedom of public assembly isn t disputable for the Serbian political elite and various problems with human rights of the non-heterosexual minority are viewed exclusively as a dilemma „for and againsť the same-sex mar¬ riages. Various other aspects, such as the issue of human rights and freedoms (the right to establishing associations, to gathering together, to protection of activists and the like) or the economic aspects of profitability of the so-called „pink indu¬ stry are neglected and as such are a long way from being solved. In Serbia there are no genuine and serious attempts to organise a national pride parade in the environment which some people pessimistically described as the environment characterised by the consequences of a ten years long war and the political instability that occasionally has all the characteristics of a crisis. Following an unsuccessful attempt to hold a pride parade in Belgrade in 2001, Novi Sad is mentioned as the only possible place for holding a parade, since it s the environment of traditional tolerance and the one that accepts diversity, even though it s still not safe enough for holding the first real public pride parade. Considering all the analysed examples, the inevitable question posed in the book is does Serbia have to wait for the procedure and the ruling of the European Court of Human Rights, as well as to put up with several years long pressures of the international community, so that an indisputable freedom - freedom of public assembly, the right of all would be honoured? We won t loose identity if we fail to respect the universal rules of reason. On the contrary, it will make us and our position in the world stronger. Why should we pay a high price for backwardness, when it is better to invest the will, knowledge and money into progress? Let s accept the challenges of modern Europe, let s not resist the values which were recognised a long time ago and which we created ourselves over centuries. In a generation or two, the current clash will perhaps look out of date and ridiculous, a well as a little bit forgotten. It ll be changed at best and burnt out, like a small part of a big process that is called progress. In the meantime, a new solidarity needs to be built on the basis of freedom of social dialogue, as well as on social cohesion and the virtue of humanity. 158
any_adam_object	1
author	Mršević, Zorica 1954-
author_GND	(DE-588)1171251483
author_facet	Mršević, Zorica 1954-
author_role	aut
author_sort	Mršević, Zorica 1954-
author_variant	z m zm
building	Verbundindex
bvnumber	BV035447228
ctrlnum	(OCoLC)450814192 (DE-599)BVBBV035447228
format	Book
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02196nam a2200493 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV035447228</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20090422 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">090422s2007 \|\|\|\| 00\|\|\| srp d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9788670931213</subfield><subfield code="9">978-86-7093-121-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)450814192</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV035447228</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">srp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="080" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">316.35</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">7,41</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mršević, Zorica</subfield><subfield code="d">1954-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1171251483</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ka demokratskom društvu</subfield><subfield code="b">sloboda javnog okupljanja, pravo svih</subfield><subfield code="c">Zorica Mršević</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Beograd</subfield><subfield code="b">Inst. Društvenih Nauka</subfield><subfield code="c">2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">163 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zsfassung in engl. Sprache u.d.T.: Towards a democratic society ...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Javna zborovanja - Spolna orientiranost - Geografski pregled</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Javna zborovanja - Spolna orientiranost - Zgodovinski pregled</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Javna zborovanja - Človekove pravice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Menschenrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4074725-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gesellschaft</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4020588-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Versammlungsfreiheit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4063146-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Demokratie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4011413-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Demokratie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4011413-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Gesellschaft</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4020588-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Versammlungsfreiheit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4063146-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Versammlungsfreiheit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4063146-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Menschenrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4074725-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSBMuenchen</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=017367355&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=017367355&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Abstract</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-017367355</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
id	DE-604.BV035447228
illustrated	Not Illustrated
indexdate	2024-07-09T21:35:28Z
institution	BVB
isbn	9788670931213
oai_aleph_id	oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-017367355
oclc_num	450814192
open_access_boolean
owner	DE-12
owner_facet	DE-12
physical	163 S.
publishDate	2007
publishDateSearch	2007
publishDateSort	2007
publisher	Inst. Društvenih Nauka
record_format	marc
spelling	Mršević, Zorica 1954- Verfasser (DE-588)1171251483 aut Ka demokratskom društvu sloboda javnog okupljanja, pravo svih Zorica Mršević Beograd Inst. Društvenih Nauka 2007 163 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Zsfassung in engl. Sprache u.d.T.: Towards a democratic society ... Javna zborovanja - Spolna orientiranost - Geografski pregled Javna zborovanja - Spolna orientiranost - Zgodovinski pregled Javna zborovanja - Človekove pravice Menschenrecht (DE-588)4074725-6 gnd rswk-swf Gesellschaft (DE-588)4020588-5 gnd rswk-swf Versammlungsfreiheit (DE-588)4063146-1 gnd rswk-swf Demokratie (DE-588)4011413-2 gnd rswk-swf Demokratie (DE-588)4011413-2 s Gesellschaft (DE-588)4020588-5 s Versammlungsfreiheit (DE-588)4063146-1 s DE-604 Menschenrecht (DE-588)4074725-6 s Digitalisierung BSBMuenchen application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=017367355&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB Muenchen application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=017367355&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Abstract
spellingShingle	Mršević, Zorica 1954- Ka demokratskom društvu sloboda javnog okupljanja, pravo svih Javna zborovanja - Spolna orientiranost - Geografski pregled Javna zborovanja - Spolna orientiranost - Zgodovinski pregled Javna zborovanja - Človekove pravice Menschenrecht (DE-588)4074725-6 gnd Gesellschaft (DE-588)4020588-5 gnd Versammlungsfreiheit (DE-588)4063146-1 gnd Demokratie (DE-588)4011413-2 gnd
subject_GND	(DE-588)4074725-6 (DE-588)4020588-5 (DE-588)4063146-1 (DE-588)4011413-2
title	Ka demokratskom društvu sloboda javnog okupljanja, pravo svih
title_auth	Ka demokratskom društvu sloboda javnog okupljanja, pravo svih
title_exact_search	Ka demokratskom društvu sloboda javnog okupljanja, pravo svih
title_full	Ka demokratskom društvu sloboda javnog okupljanja, pravo svih Zorica Mršević
title_fullStr	Ka demokratskom društvu sloboda javnog okupljanja, pravo svih Zorica Mršević
title_full_unstemmed	Ka demokratskom društvu sloboda javnog okupljanja, pravo svih Zorica Mršević
title_short	Ka demokratskom društvu
title_sort	ka demokratskom drustvu sloboda javnog okupljanja pravo svih
title_sub	sloboda javnog okupljanja, pravo svih
topic	Javna zborovanja - Spolna orientiranost - Geografski pregled Javna zborovanja - Spolna orientiranost - Zgodovinski pregled Javna zborovanja - Človekove pravice Menschenrecht (DE-588)4074725-6 gnd Gesellschaft (DE-588)4020588-5 gnd Versammlungsfreiheit (DE-588)4063146-1 gnd Demokratie (DE-588)4011413-2 gnd
topic_facet	Javna zborovanja - Spolna orientiranost - Geografski pregled Javna zborovanja - Spolna orientiranost - Zgodovinski pregled Javna zborovanja - Človekove pravice Menschenrecht Gesellschaft Versammlungsfreiheit Demokratie
url	http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=017367355&sequence=000003&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=017367355&sequence=000004&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA
work_keys_str_mv	AT mrseviczorica kademokratskomdrustvuslobodajavnogokupljanjapravosvih

Verfügbarkeit

Es ist kein Print-Exemplar vorhanden.

Fernleihe Bestellen Achtung: Nicht im THWS-Bestand! Inhaltsverzeichnis

MARC

Datensatz im Suchindex

Es ist kein Print-Exemplar vorhanden.

Ähnliche Einträge