Aporetics: rational deliberation in the face of inconsistency
"The word apory stems from the Greek aporia, meaning impasse or perplexing difficulty. In Aporetics, Nicholas Rescher defines an apory as a group of individually plausible but collectively incompatible theses. Rescher examines historic, formulaic, and systematic apories and couples these with a...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Pittsburgh, Pa.
Univ. of Pittsburgh Press
2009
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Zusammenfassung: | "The word apory stems from the Greek aporia, meaning impasse or perplexing difficulty. In Aporetics, Nicholas Rescher defines an apory as a group of individually plausible but collectively incompatible theses. Rescher examines historic, formulaic, and systematic apories and couples these with aporetic theory from other authors to form this original and comprehensive survey. Citing thinkers from the pre-Socratics through Spinoza, Hegel, and Nicolai Hartmann, he builds a framework for coping with the complexities of divergent theses, and shows in detail how aporetic analysis can be applied to a variety of fields including philosophy, mathematics, linguistics, logic, and intellectual history." "Rescher's in-depth examination reveals how aporetic inconsistency can be managed through a plausibility analysis that breaks the chain of inconsistency at its weakest link by deploying right-of-way precedence based on considerations of cognitive centrality. Thus while involvement with cognitive conflicts and inconsistencies are pervasive in human thought, aporetic analysis can provide an effective means of damage control."--BOOK JACKET. |
| Beschreibung: | Includes bibliographical references and index |
| Beschreibung: | X, 161 S. graph. Darst. |
| ISBN: | 9780822943631 0822943638 9780822960577 0822960575 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV035347871 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20100708 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 090305s2009 xxud||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 010 | |a 2008037727 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780822943631 |c cloth : alk. paper |9 978-0-8229-4363-1 | ||
| 020 | |a 0822943638 |c cloth : alk. paper |9 0-8229-4363-8 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780822960577 |9 978-0-8229-6057-7 | ||
| 020 | |a 0822960575 |9 0-8229-6057-5 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)228363860 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV035347871 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a xxu |c US | ||
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-29 |a DE-384 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a B187.A66 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 121 | |
| 084 | |a CC 1100 |0 (DE-625)17603: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a CI 6585 |0 (DE-625)18547:11797 |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a 5,1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Rescher, Nicholas |d 1928-2024 |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)118599836 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Aporetics |b rational deliberation in the face of inconsistency |c Nicholas Rescher |
| 264 | 1 | |a Pittsburgh, Pa. |b Univ. of Pittsburgh Press |c 2009 | |
| 300 | |a X, 161 S. |b graph. Darst. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index | ||
| 520 | 1 | |a "The word apory stems from the Greek aporia, meaning impasse or perplexing difficulty. In Aporetics, Nicholas Rescher defines an apory as a group of individually plausible but collectively incompatible theses. Rescher examines historic, formulaic, and systematic apories and couples these with aporetic theory from other authors to form this original and comprehensive survey. Citing thinkers from the pre-Socratics through Spinoza, Hegel, and Nicolai Hartmann, he builds a framework for coping with the complexities of divergent theses, and shows in detail how aporetic analysis can be applied to a variety of fields including philosophy, mathematics, linguistics, logic, and intellectual history." "Rescher's in-depth examination reveals how aporetic inconsistency can be managed through a plausibility analysis that breaks the chain of inconsistency at its weakest link by deploying right-of-way precedence based on considerations of cognitive centrality. Thus while involvement with cognitive conflicts and inconsistencies are pervasive in human thought, aporetic analysis can provide an effective means of damage control."--BOOK JACKET. | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Aporia | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Kontrafaktisches Denken |0 (DE-588)4577003-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Aporie |0 (DE-588)4135001-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rationalität |0 (DE-588)4048507-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Rationalität |0 (DE-588)4048507-9 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Aporie |0 (DE-588)4135001-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Kontrafaktisches Denken |0 (DE-588)4577003-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m LoC Fremddatenuebernahme |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=017152073&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-017152073 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804138667109777408 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | APORETICS
/ RESCHER, NICHOLAS
: 2009
TABLE OF CONTENTS / INHALTSVERZEICHNIS
THE NATURE OF APORIES
COHERENTISM : AN APORETIC APPROACH TO EMPIRICAL INQUIRY
COUNTERFACTUAL CONDITIONALS
VARIANT ANALYSES OF COUNTERFACTUALS AND PROBLEMS OF PROBABILITY
THE APORETICS OF COUNTERFACTUAL HISTORY
PARADOXES
PHILOSOPHICAL APORETICS
THE DIALECTICS OF PHILOSOPHICAL DEVELOPMENT
THE RATIONALE OF APORETIC VARIATION.
DIESES SCHRIFTSTUECK WURDE MASCHINELL ERZEUGT.
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Rescher, Nicholas 1928-2024 |
| author_GND | (DE-588)118599836 |
| author_facet | Rescher, Nicholas 1928-2024 |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Rescher, Nicholas 1928-2024 |
| author_variant | n r nr |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV035347871 |
| callnumber-first | B - Philosophy, Psychology, Religion |
| callnumber-label | B187 |
| callnumber-raw | B187.A66 |
| callnumber-search | B187.A66 |
| callnumber-sort | B 3187 A66 |
| callnumber-subject | B - Philosophy |
| classification_rvk | CC 1100 CI 6585 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)228363860 (DE-599)BVBBV035347871 |
| dewey-full | 121 |
| dewey-hundreds | 100 - Philosophy & psychology |
| dewey-ones | 121 - Epistemology (Theory of knowledge) |
| dewey-raw | 121 |
| dewey-search | 121 |
| dewey-sort | 3121 |
| dewey-tens | 120 - Epistemology, causation, humankind |
| discipline | Philosophie |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03064nam a2200505zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV035347871</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20100708 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">090305s2009 xxud||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2008037727</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780822943631</subfield><subfield code="c">cloth : alk. paper</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-8229-4363-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0822943638</subfield><subfield code="c">cloth : alk. paper</subfield><subfield code="9">0-8229-4363-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780822960577</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-8229-6057-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0822960575</subfield><subfield code="9">0-8229-6057-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)228363860</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV035347871</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxu</subfield><subfield code="c">US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">B187.A66</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">121</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CC 1100</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)17603:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CI 6585</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)18547:11797</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5,1</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rescher, Nicholas</subfield><subfield code="d">1928-2024</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)118599836</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Aporetics</subfield><subfield code="b">rational deliberation in the face of inconsistency</subfield><subfield code="c">Nicholas Rescher</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Pittsburgh, Pa.</subfield><subfield code="b">Univ. of Pittsburgh Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">X, 161 S.</subfield><subfield code="b">graph. Darst.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"The word apory stems from the Greek aporia, meaning impasse or perplexing difficulty. In Aporetics, Nicholas Rescher defines an apory as a group of individually plausible but collectively incompatible theses. Rescher examines historic, formulaic, and systematic apories and couples these with aporetic theory from other authors to form this original and comprehensive survey. Citing thinkers from the pre-Socratics through Spinoza, Hegel, and Nicolai Hartmann, he builds a framework for coping with the complexities of divergent theses, and shows in detail how aporetic analysis can be applied to a variety of fields including philosophy, mathematics, linguistics, logic, and intellectual history." "Rescher's in-depth examination reveals how aporetic inconsistency can be managed through a plausibility analysis that breaks the chain of inconsistency at its weakest link by deploying right-of-way precedence based on considerations of cognitive centrality. Thus while involvement with cognitive conflicts and inconsistencies are pervasive in human thought, aporetic analysis can provide an effective means of damage control."--BOOK JACKET.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Aporia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kontrafaktisches Denken</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4577003-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Aporie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4135001-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rationalität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048507-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rationalität</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4048507-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Aporie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4135001-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Kontrafaktisches Denken</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4577003-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">LoC Fremddatenuebernahme</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=017152073&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-017152073</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV035347871 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T21:31:50Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780822943631 0822943638 9780822960577 0822960575 |
| language | English |
| lccn | 2008037727 |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-017152073 |
| oclc_num | 228363860 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-29 DE-384 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-29 DE-384 |
| physical | X, 161 S. graph. Darst. |
| publishDate | 2009 |
| publishDateSearch | 2009 |
| publishDateSort | 2009 |
| publisher | Univ. of Pittsburgh Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Rescher, Nicholas 1928-2024 Verfasser (DE-588)118599836 aut Aporetics rational deliberation in the face of inconsistency Nicholas Rescher Pittsburgh, Pa. Univ. of Pittsburgh Press 2009 X, 161 S. graph. Darst. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Includes bibliographical references and index "The word apory stems from the Greek aporia, meaning impasse or perplexing difficulty. In Aporetics, Nicholas Rescher defines an apory as a group of individually plausible but collectively incompatible theses. Rescher examines historic, formulaic, and systematic apories and couples these with aporetic theory from other authors to form this original and comprehensive survey. Citing thinkers from the pre-Socratics through Spinoza, Hegel, and Nicolai Hartmann, he builds a framework for coping with the complexities of divergent theses, and shows in detail how aporetic analysis can be applied to a variety of fields including philosophy, mathematics, linguistics, logic, and intellectual history." "Rescher's in-depth examination reveals how aporetic inconsistency can be managed through a plausibility analysis that breaks the chain of inconsistency at its weakest link by deploying right-of-way precedence based on considerations of cognitive centrality. Thus while involvement with cognitive conflicts and inconsistencies are pervasive in human thought, aporetic analysis can provide an effective means of damage control."--BOOK JACKET. Aporia Kontrafaktisches Denken (DE-588)4577003-7 gnd rswk-swf Aporie (DE-588)4135001-7 gnd rswk-swf Rationalität (DE-588)4048507-9 gnd rswk-swf Rationalität (DE-588)4048507-9 s Aporie (DE-588)4135001-7 s Kontrafaktisches Denken (DE-588)4577003-7 s DE-604 LoC Fremddatenuebernahme application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=017152073&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Rescher, Nicholas 1928-2024 Aporetics rational deliberation in the face of inconsistency Aporia Kontrafaktisches Denken (DE-588)4577003-7 gnd Aporie (DE-588)4135001-7 gnd Rationalität (DE-588)4048507-9 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4577003-7 (DE-588)4135001-7 (DE-588)4048507-9 |
| title | Aporetics rational deliberation in the face of inconsistency |
| title_auth | Aporetics rational deliberation in the face of inconsistency |
| title_exact_search | Aporetics rational deliberation in the face of inconsistency |
| title_full | Aporetics rational deliberation in the face of inconsistency Nicholas Rescher |
| title_fullStr | Aporetics rational deliberation in the face of inconsistency Nicholas Rescher |
| title_full_unstemmed | Aporetics rational deliberation in the face of inconsistency Nicholas Rescher |
| title_short | Aporetics |
| title_sort | aporetics rational deliberation in the face of inconsistency |
| title_sub | rational deliberation in the face of inconsistency |
| topic | Aporia Kontrafaktisches Denken (DE-588)4577003-7 gnd Aporie (DE-588)4135001-7 gnd Rationalität (DE-588)4048507-9 gnd |
| topic_facet | Aporia Kontrafaktisches Denken Aporie Rationalität |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=017152073&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT reschernicholas aporeticsrationaldeliberationinthefaceofinconsistency |