Methods of interpretation: how the Supreme Court reads the Constitution
"Methods of Interpretation: How the Supreme Court Reads the Constitution provides students of the Court with an overview of the perennial best approaches to constitutional interpretation as practiced, not theorized." "This landmark work examines the various methodologies the Supreme C...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Oxford [u.a.]
Oxford Univ. Press
2009
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Zusammenfassung: | "Methods of Interpretation: How the Supreme Court Reads the Constitution provides students of the Court with an overview of the perennial best approaches to constitutional interpretation as practiced, not theorized." "This landmark work examines the various methodologies the Supreme Court and individual justices have employed when interpreting the Constitution. Rather than attempting to set forth an overall theory of constitutional interpretation or enter into the scholarly debate over interpretative theory, Lackland H. Bloom, Jr. focuses exclusively on what the Court and individual justices have done and said about constitutional interpretation in the course of deciding specific cases. Some methodologies of constitutional interpretation have changed over the course of the Court's history but most have not. Indeed several of the most prevalent methods of constitutional interpretation and adjudication are simply variations of techniques often employed by lawyers and judges well before the Constitution was drafted and ratified. This book identifies many of the best - and a few of the worst - examples of particular interpretative methodologies, as well as the preeminent discussions of constitutional interpretation by individual justices."--BOOK JACKET. |
| Beschreibung: | Includes bibliographical references and index |
| Beschreibung: | XXV, 566 S. |
| ISBN: | 9780195377118 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV035324408 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20101109 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 090220s2009 xxk |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 010 | |a 2008037195 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780195377118 |c (hardback |9 978-0-19-537711-8 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)236333684 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV035324408 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a xxk |c GB | ||
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-384 |a DE-29 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a KF8742 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 347.73/26 | |
| 084 | |a PL 734 |0 (DE-625)137270: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Bloom, Lackland H. |d 1948- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)138102031 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Methods of interpretation |b how the Supreme Court reads the Constitution |c Lackland H. Bloom, Jr. |
| 264 | 1 | |a Oxford [u.a.] |b Oxford Univ. Press |c 2009 | |
| 300 | |a XXV, 566 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Includes bibliographical references and index | ||
| 520 | 1 | |a "Methods of Interpretation: How the Supreme Court Reads the Constitution provides students of the Court with an overview of the perennial best approaches to constitutional interpretation as practiced, not theorized." "This landmark work examines the various methodologies the Supreme Court and individual justices have employed when interpreting the Constitution. Rather than attempting to set forth an overall theory of constitutional interpretation or enter into the scholarly debate over interpretative theory, Lackland H. Bloom, Jr. focuses exclusively on what the Court and individual justices have done and said about constitutional interpretation in the course of deciding specific cases. Some methodologies of constitutional interpretation have changed over the course of the Court's history but most have not. Indeed several of the most prevalent methods of constitutional interpretation and adjudication are simply variations of techniques often employed by lawyers and judges well before the Constitution was drafted and ratified. This book identifies many of the best - and a few of the worst - examples of particular interpretative methodologies, as well as the preeminent discussions of constitutional interpretation by individual justices."--BOOK JACKET. | |
| 610 | 2 | 4 | |a United States |b Supreme Court |x History |
| 610 | 2 | 7 | |a USA |b Supreme Court |0 (DE-588)35650-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 4 | |a Geschichte | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Recht | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Judicial process |z United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Law |z United States |x Interpretation and construction | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Judicial review |z United States | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Verfassungsauslegung |0 (DE-588)4187678-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 4 | |a USA | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a USA |b Supreme Court |0 (DE-588)35650-5 |D b |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Verfassungsauslegung |0 (DE-588)4187678-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m GBV Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=017128927&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-017128927 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804138634216996864 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | METHODS OF INTERPRETATION: HOWTHE SUPREME COURT READS THE CONSTITUTION
LACKLAND H. BLOOM, JR. OXFORD UNIVER.SITY PRESS CONTENTS INTRODUCTION
XVII CHAPTERONE TEXTUALISM AND ITS CANONS 1 I. DEFINING TEXTUALISM 1 IL
THE ALLURE OF TEXTUALISM 2 III. SOME BASIC CANONS OF TEXTUALISM 5 A. THE
CONSTITUTIONAL TEXT SHOULD NOT BE GIVEN A STRICT CONSTRUCTION 6 B. THE
CONSTITUTIONAL TEXT SHOULD BE GIVEN ITS PLAIN MEANING 10 C.
UNDERSTANDING LEGAL TERMS OF ART 14 D. AMBIGUOUS LANGUAGE AND MULTIPLE
MEANINGS 18 E. THE TEXT SHOULD BE READ TO AVOID SURPLUS AND REDUNDANCY
21 F. A NEGATIVE INFERENCE CAN BE DRAWN FROM AFFIRMATIVE TEXT 23 G.
EXCEPTIONS DEFINE THE EXTENT OF POWER 26 H. THE COURT SHOULD FOCUS ON
THE PRECISE WORDS OF THE TEXT AND NOT SOME PARAPHRASED ALTERNATIVE 27
CHAPTER TWO INTRATEXTUALISM AND TEXTUAL PURPOSE 31 I.
INTRATEXTUALISM*USING THE TEXT TO READ THE TEXT 31 A. USAGE WITHIN THE
CONSTITUTION 31 B. USAGE IN CONTEXT 34 C. CONGRUENCE WITH OTHER CLAUSES
36 VIII CONTENTS D. CONGRUENCE OVER TIME 43 E. CONSTITUTIONAL
ARCHITECTURE 44 IL READING THE TEXT IN LIGHT OF ITS PURPOSE 45 III. THE
LIMITS OF TEXTUALISM 51 A. ABSENCE OF RELEVANT TEXT 51 B. DISREGARDING
TEXT*THE CASE OF THE ELEVENTH AMENDMENT 53 IV. CONCLUSION 55 CHAPTER
THREE ORIGINAL UNDERSTANDING: PRECONSTITUTIONAL SOURCES AND THE DRAFTING
AND RATIFICATION PROCESS 57 I. WHAT IS ORIGINAL UNDERSTANDING? 57 IL
PRECONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY AND SOURCES 5G A. ENGLISH HISTORY 59 B.
THECOMMONLAWOFENGLAND 67 C. BLACKSTONE S COMMENTARIES ON THE LAW OF
ENGLAND 69 D. COLONIAL HISTORY 71 E. DECLARATION OFLNDEPENDENCE 72 F.
ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION AND EXPERIENCE THEREUNDER 72 G. THE VIRGINIA
EXPERIENCE AND THE RELIGION CLAUSES 75 III. DRAFTING AND RATIFICATION OF
THE CONSTITUTION AND ITS AMENDMENTS 78 A. STATEMENTS AND DEBATE DURING
THE DRAFTING PROCESS 79 B. CHANGES IN THE TEXT DURING THE DRAFTING
PROCESS 81 C. THE SIGNIFICANCE OF REJECTED PROVISIONS 82 D.
UNDERSTANDING DURING THE RATIFICATION PROCESS 85 E. ABSENCE OF
DISCUSSION 88 F. THE FEDERALIST PAPERS 89 CONTENTS IX CHAPTER FOUR
ORIGINAL UNDERSTANDING: CONTEMPORANEOUS UNDERSTANDING AND INTERPRETIVE
ISSUES 93 I. CONTEMPORANEOUS PRACTICE AND UNDERSTANDING 93 A.
CONTEMPORANEOUS DICTIONARIES AND OTHER WRITINGS 93 B. PRE- AND
POST-RATIFICATION STATE CONSTITUTIONS 95 C. CONTEMPORANEOUS STATE
PRACTICE 97 D. CONTEMPORANEOUS CONGRESSIONAL PRACTICE 99 E. EARLY
CONGRESSIONAL AND EXECUTIVE PRACTICE 101 F. CONTEMPORANEOUS JUDICIAL
UNDERSTANDING 104 G. PROMINENT FRAMERS AND SOURCES 106 IL INTERPRETIVE
ISSUES REGARDING ORIGINAL UNDERSTANDING 113 A- UNSOURCED ORIGINAL
UNDERSTANDING 113 B. ORIGINAL UNDERSTANDING TO ILLUMINATE PURPOSE 114 C.
DUELING HISTORIES 117 D- REVISING HISTORY 122 E- ORIGINAL UNDERSTANDING
AS A METHOD OF EXCLUSION 123 F. INCONCLUSIVE ORIGINAL UNDERSTANDING 124
G. BROAD PRINCIPLE V. SPECIFIE CONCEPTIONS 126 H- TAKING ACCOUNT OF
CHANGE 129 I. UNACCEPTABLE OUTCOMES 131 III. CONCLUSION 131 CHAPTER FIVE
TRADITION AND PRACTICE 133 I. INTRODUCTION 133 IL LONG AND CONTINUOUS
FEDERAL EXECUTIVE OR LEGISLATIVE PRACTICE 134 A. PRACTICES EXTENDING TO
THE TIME OF THE FRAMING 134 CONTENTS B. SEPARATION OF POWERS AND
CONGRESSIONAL PRACTICE 137 C. SERIOUS LEGISLATIVE OR EXECUTIVE
CONSIDERATION 139 III. LONG-STANDING PRACTICE AND THE ESTABLISHMENT
CLAUSE 140 FV. TRADITION AND THE PUBLIC FORUM DOCTRINE 144 V.
TRADITION AND PRACTICE AND DUE PROCESS 146 A. TRADITION AND
INCORPORATION 147 B. TRADITION AND SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS LIBERTY 149
VI. RELIANCE ON INTERNATIONAL PRACTICE 154 VIL LEVELOFGENERALITY 155
VIII. EVOLVING STANDARDS*THE LIVING CONSTITUTION 158 IX. CHANGE,
DECLINE, AND ABSENCE OF TRADITION AND PRACTICE 161 A. INSUFFICIENT
LENGTH TO A PRACTICE 161 B. DELIBERATE CHANGE TO LEGISLATIVE PRACTICE
162 C. DECLINING LEGISLATIVE OR JUDICIAL PRACTICE 162 D. THE ABSENCE OF
PRACTICE 164 X. EVALUATING TRADITION 165 XI. CONCLUSION 166 CHAPTER SIX
STRUCTURAL REASONING 169 I. NATURE OF STRUCTURAL REASONING 169 IL
CLASSIC STRUCTURAL ARGUMENTS 170 A. MARBURY V. MADISON 170 B. MARTIN V.
HUNTER S LESSEE 171 C. MCCULLOCHV. MARYLAND 171 III. BIG PICTURE
STRUCTURE 173 IV. DERIVING STRUCTURAL ARGUMENTS 177 A. STRUCTURE AND
ORIGINAL UNDERSTANDING 177 B. STRUCTURE ON ITS OWN*THE ELEVENTH
AMENDMENT CASES 179 C. STRUCTURE AND PURPOSE 182 D. STRUCTURE BY
CONTRAST 183 CONTENTS XI V. STRUCTURE AND JUDICIAL REVIEW 184 VI.
STRUCTURE AND RIGHTS 190 VIL STRUCTURE AND SEPARATION OFPOWERS 191 VIII.
STRUCTURE V. STRUCTURE 196 IX. CONCLUSION 202 CHAPTER SEVEN PRECEDENT
205 I. INTRODUCTION 205 IL DEVELOPING PRECEDENT*THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE
206 III. INTERPRETING AND SHAPING PRECEDENT 211 A. UNDERSTANDING
PRECEDENT 211 B. EXPANDING PRECEDENT 212 C. UNDERSTANDING PRECEDENT
BASED ON ITSFACTS 218 D. UNIQUE PRECEDENT 219 E. NARROWING PRECEDENT 222
F. PRECEDENT AND ANALOGY 222 G. THE WEIGHTOF PRECEDENT 225 H. DICTA 227
IV. DISTINGUISHING PRECEDENT 230 A. PRECEDENT UNDERMINED BY SUBSEQUENT
CASES 231 B. FACTUAL AND LEGAL DISTINCTIONS 232 V. OVERRULING PRECEDENT
237 A. RECONSIDERATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL PRECEDENT 237 B. DEPARTURE FROM
ESTABLISHED DOCTRINE 240 C. ABANDONED PRECEDENT 241 D. REJECTING THE
UNDERLYING PREDICATES 242 E. CHANGED FACTS OR CIRCUMSTANCES 244 F.
RELIANCE INTEREST 246 G. UNWORKABILITY 248 H. COMPARISON TO OTHER
OVERRULED DECISIONS 250 I. INCORRECTLY DECIDED 251 J. IU-CONSIDERED
PRECEDENT 253 K. PRECEDENT UNSUPPORTED BY OTHER SOURCES 254 XII CONTENTS
L. PRECEDENT UNDERMINED BY EXTRAJUDICIAL SOURCES 254 VI. CONCLUSION 255
CHAPTER EIGHT DERIVING DOCTRINE 257 I. INTRODUCTION 257 IL DERIVING
PRINCIPLE 258 A. FREEDOMOF SPEECH PRINCIPLE 259 B. EQUAL PROTECTION AND
RACIAL DISCRIMINATION 263 C. ONE PERSON ONE VOTE 267 D. THE RIGHT TO AN
ABORTION 269 E. PRINCIPLE V. PRINCIPLE 270 III. FROM PRINCIPLE TO
DOCTRINE*THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE 271 A. THE WALL OF SEPARATION 271 B.
THE LEMON TEST 274 LV. DERIVING DOCTRINE 277 A. THE SEARCH FOR
INTERMEDIATE PRINCIPLES 277 B. DOCTRINE FROM DISSENT*SEDITIOUS SPEECH
278 C. DOCTRINE BY BLUEPRINT*STRICT SCRUTINY 281 D. DOCTRINE AS
RECONCILIATION*FREE SPEECH ANDLIBEL 285 E. DOCTRINE BY ACCIDENT*AIL
DELIBERATE SPEED 287 V. SOURCES OF DOCTRINE 288 A. DOCTRINE FROM
PRECEDENT 289 B. DOCTRINE FROM PURPOSE 292 C. DOCTRINE FROM STRUCTURE
295 D. DOCTRINE FROM NECESSITY 296 E. DOCTRINE FROM THEORY 299 F.
DOCTRINE AS SUMMARY 300 G. BORROWING DOCTRINE 301 H. DOCTRINE FROM
WHOLECLOTH 301 VI. CONCLUSION 305 CONTENTS XIII CHAPTER NINE SHAPING,
CLARIFYING, AND CHANGING DOCTRINE 307 I. INTRODUCTION 307 II. SHAPING
DOCTRINE 307 A. DEFINING THE ISSUE 307 B. EMPIRICAL SUPPORT FOR DOCTRINE
308 C. THE IMPACT OF DOCTRINE 313 D. LINE DRAWING 315 E. BRIGHT LINES
317 F. INTEREST BALANCING TO CREATE DOCTRINE 321 G. ANTI-DOCTRINE*AD HOC
JUDGMENT 324 H. MULTIFACTOR TESTS 327 I. AVOIDING EVASION 329 J.
IMPLEMENTING DOCTRINE PROCEDURALLY 330 III. CLARIFYING DOCTRINE 332 A.
PRINCIPLED APPLICATION 332 B. DOCTRINE IN FLUX 335 C. RESOLVING
DOCTRINAL CONFLICTS 336 D. JUSTIFYING DOCTRINE 337 E. CHOICEOF DOCTRINE
337 F. CLEANING UP A DOCTRINAL MESS 338 G. CHANGING DOCTRINE 344 IV.
CONCLUSION 350 CHAPTER TEN CONSEQUENTIAL REASONING 351 I. INTRODUCTION
351 IL CLASSIC CONSEQUENTIAL ARGUMENTS 352 III. WILL THE BAD
CONSEQUENCES OCCUR? 355 A. AVOIDING THE RISK 355 B. THE DANGER
OFSMALLRISKS 355 C. REMOTE POSSIBILITIES 356 D. PROVING BAD CONSEQUENCES
358 IV. CAN THE COURT PREVENT BAD CONSEQUENCES FROM OCCURRING? 360 A.
CAN A PRINCIPLED LINE BE DRAWN? 360 B. TAKING A CASE-BY-CASE APPROACH
361 C. THE INABILITY TO IMPOSE LIMITS AS A DECISIVE FACTOR 364 XIV
CONTENTS D. BAD CONSEQUENCES FOR THE COURT AND ITS DOCTRINE 366 V. ARE
THE CONSEQUENCES REALLY THAT BAD? 366 VI. SHOULD THE POSSIBILITY OF BAD
CONSEQUENCES INFLUENCE THE DECISION? 367 VII. BAD CONSEQUENCES AS
RHETORICAL ARGUMENT 368 VIII. CONCLUSION 370 CHAPTER ELEVEN ETHICAL
ARGUMENT 371 I. THE NATURE OF ETHICAL ARGUMENT 371 II. ETHICAL ARGUMENT
AND CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT 372 A. THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT AND
EVOLVING STANDARDS 372 B. THE DEATH PENALTY CASES 374 C. THE LENGTHOF
SENTENCE CASES 386 III. SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS CASES 389 A. THE
PUNITIVE DAMAGE CASES 389 B. THE DUE PROCESS PRIVACY CASES 392 IV. ONE
PERSON, ONE VOTE 396 V. ETHICAL ARGUMENT EVERYWHERE? 396 CHAPTER TWELVE
RHETORIC IN CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION 399 I. INTRODUCTION 399 II.
RHETORIC TO BOLSTER PRINCIPLE 399 A. ATTHEOUTSET* MARBURY V. MADISON 399
B. FIRST AMENDMENT CLASSICS 400 C. THE RHETORIC OF JUSTICE JACKSON 404
III. RHETORIC TO EMPHASIZE STRENGTH OF CONVICTION 405 IV. ENDURING
RHETORIC 406 V. METAPHOR 409 VI. RHETORIC IN DISSENT 411 VIL INEFFECTIVE
RHETORIC 412 VIII. RHETORIC WARS 414 IX. COLORFUL RHETORIC 415 X
CONCLUSION 416 CONTENTS XV CHAPTER THIRTEEN SYNTHESIS 419 I. COHENS V.
VIRGINIA 419 IL THE SLAUGHTER-HOUSE CASES 425 III. POWELLV.ALABAMA 432
IV. NEW YORK TIMES V. SULLIVAN 434 V. LEE V. WEISMAN 437 NOTES 445 TABLE
OF CASES 541 INDEX 553
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author | Bloom, Lackland H. 1948- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)138102031 |
| author_facet | Bloom, Lackland H. 1948- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Bloom, Lackland H. 1948- |
| author_variant | l h b lh lhb |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV035324408 |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | KF8742 |
| callnumber-raw | KF8742 |
| callnumber-search | KF8742 |
| callnumber-sort | KF 48742 |
| callnumber-subject | KF - United States |
| classification_rvk | PL 734 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)236333684 (DE-599)BVBBV035324408 |
| dewey-full | 347.73/26 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 347 - Procedure and courts |
| dewey-raw | 347.73/26 |
| dewey-search | 347.73/26 |
| dewey-sort | 3347.73 226 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03104nam a2200493zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV035324408</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20101109 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">090220s2009 xxk |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="010" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2008037195</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780195377118</subfield><subfield code="c">(hardback</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-19-537711-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)236333684</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV035324408</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxk</subfield><subfield code="c">GB</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KF8742</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">347.73/26</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PL 734</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)137270:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bloom, Lackland H.</subfield><subfield code="d">1948-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)138102031</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Methods of interpretation</subfield><subfield code="b">how the Supreme Court reads the Constitution</subfield><subfield code="c">Lackland H. Bloom, Jr.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Oxford Univ. Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XXV, 566 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references and index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Methods of Interpretation: How the Supreme Court Reads the Constitution provides students of the Court with an overview of the perennial best approaches to constitutional interpretation as practiced, not theorized." "This landmark work examines the various methodologies the Supreme Court and individual justices have employed when interpreting the Constitution. Rather than attempting to set forth an overall theory of constitutional interpretation or enter into the scholarly debate over interpretative theory, Lackland H. Bloom, Jr. focuses exclusively on what the Court and individual justices have done and said about constitutional interpretation in the course of deciding specific cases. Some methodologies of constitutional interpretation have changed over the course of the Court's history but most have not. Indeed several of the most prevalent methods of constitutional interpretation and adjudication are simply variations of techniques often employed by lawyers and judges well before the Constitution was drafted and ratified. This book identifies many of the best - and a few of the worst - examples of particular interpretative methodologies, as well as the preeminent discussions of constitutional interpretation by individual justices."--BOOK JACKET.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="x">History</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)35650-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Geschichte</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Recht</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judicial process</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="x">Interpretation and construction</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judicial review</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Verfassungsauslegung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4187678-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)35650-5</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Verfassungsauslegung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4187678-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">GBV Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=017128927&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-017128927</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | USA |
| geographic_facet | USA |
| id | DE-604.BV035324408 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T21:31:18Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780195377118 |
| language | English |
| lccn | 2008037195 |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-017128927 |
| oclc_num | 236333684 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-384 DE-29 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-384 DE-29 |
| physical | XXV, 566 S. |
| publishDate | 2009 |
| publishDateSearch | 2009 |
| publishDateSort | 2009 |
| publisher | Oxford Univ. Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Bloom, Lackland H. 1948- Verfasser (DE-588)138102031 aut Methods of interpretation how the Supreme Court reads the Constitution Lackland H. Bloom, Jr. Oxford [u.a.] Oxford Univ. Press 2009 XXV, 566 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Includes bibliographical references and index "Methods of Interpretation: How the Supreme Court Reads the Constitution provides students of the Court with an overview of the perennial best approaches to constitutional interpretation as practiced, not theorized." "This landmark work examines the various methodologies the Supreme Court and individual justices have employed when interpreting the Constitution. Rather than attempting to set forth an overall theory of constitutional interpretation or enter into the scholarly debate over interpretative theory, Lackland H. Bloom, Jr. focuses exclusively on what the Court and individual justices have done and said about constitutional interpretation in the course of deciding specific cases. Some methodologies of constitutional interpretation have changed over the course of the Court's history but most have not. Indeed several of the most prevalent methods of constitutional interpretation and adjudication are simply variations of techniques often employed by lawyers and judges well before the Constitution was drafted and ratified. This book identifies many of the best - and a few of the worst - examples of particular interpretative methodologies, as well as the preeminent discussions of constitutional interpretation by individual justices."--BOOK JACKET. United States Supreme Court History USA Supreme Court (DE-588)35650-5 gnd rswk-swf Geschichte Recht Judicial process United States Law United States Interpretation and construction Judicial review United States Verfassungsauslegung (DE-588)4187678-7 gnd rswk-swf USA USA Supreme Court (DE-588)35650-5 b Verfassungsauslegung (DE-588)4187678-7 s DE-604 GBV Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=017128927&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Bloom, Lackland H. 1948- Methods of interpretation how the Supreme Court reads the Constitution United States Supreme Court History USA Supreme Court (DE-588)35650-5 gnd Geschichte Recht Judicial process United States Law United States Interpretation and construction Judicial review United States Verfassungsauslegung (DE-588)4187678-7 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)35650-5 (DE-588)4187678-7 |
| title | Methods of interpretation how the Supreme Court reads the Constitution |
| title_auth | Methods of interpretation how the Supreme Court reads the Constitution |
| title_exact_search | Methods of interpretation how the Supreme Court reads the Constitution |
| title_full | Methods of interpretation how the Supreme Court reads the Constitution Lackland H. Bloom, Jr. |
| title_fullStr | Methods of interpretation how the Supreme Court reads the Constitution Lackland H. Bloom, Jr. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Methods of interpretation how the Supreme Court reads the Constitution Lackland H. Bloom, Jr. |
| title_short | Methods of interpretation |
| title_sort | methods of interpretation how the supreme court reads the constitution |
| title_sub | how the Supreme Court reads the Constitution |
| topic | United States Supreme Court History USA Supreme Court (DE-588)35650-5 gnd Geschichte Recht Judicial process United States Law United States Interpretation and construction Judicial review United States Verfassungsauslegung (DE-588)4187678-7 gnd |
| topic_facet | United States Supreme Court History USA Supreme Court Geschichte Recht Judicial process United States Law United States Interpretation and construction Judicial review United States Verfassungsauslegung USA |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=017128927&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bloomlacklandh methodsofinterpretationhowthesupremecourtreadstheconstitution |