Europeanisation of administrative justice?: the influence of the ECJ's case law in Italy, Germany and England
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Groningen
Europa Law Publ.
2009
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Beschreibung: | Zsfassungen in niederländ., dt., ital. und fries. Sprache |
Beschreibung: | XX, 416 S. |
ISBN: | 9789076871974 9076871973 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a22000002c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV035254254 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20090303 | ||
007 | t| | ||
008 | 090119s2009 xx |||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 9789076871974 |9 978-90-7687-197-4 | ||
020 | |a 9076871973 |9 90-7687-197-3 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)262433621 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ288422562 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-29 |a DE-12 | ||
050 | 0 | |a KJC5647 | |
050 | 0 | |a KJE5602 | |
082 | 0 | |a 349 | |
084 | |a PS 2960 |0 (DE-625)139745: |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a Eliantonio, Mariolina |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Europeanisation of administrative justice? |b the influence of the ECJ's case law in Italy, Germany and England |c Mariolina Eliantonio |
264 | 1 | |a Groningen |b Europa Law Publ. |c 2009 | |
300 | |a XX, 416 S. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Zsfassungen in niederländ., dt., ital. und fries. Sprache | ||
610 | 2 | 7 | |a Europäischer Gerichtshof |0 (DE-588)5103273-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 4 | |a Administrative courts |z European Union countries | |
650 | 4 | |a Administrative courts |z Germany |v Rules and practice | |
650 | 4 | |a Administrative courts |z Great Britain |v Rules and practice | |
650 | 4 | |a Administrative courts |z Italy |v Rules and practice | |
650 | 4 | |a Judicial review of administrative acts |z European Union countries | |
650 | 4 | |a Judicial review of administrative acts |z Germany | |
650 | 4 | |a Judicial review of administrative acts |z Great Britain | |
650 | 4 | |a Judicial review of administrative acts |z Italy | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Verwaltungsrecht |0 (DE-588)4063351-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Entscheidung |0 (DE-588)4014904-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
651 | 4 | |a Deutschland | |
651 | 4 | |a Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten | |
651 | 4 | |a Großbritannien | |
651 | 4 | |a Italien | |
651 | 7 | |a Deutschland |0 (DE-588)4011882-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
651 | 7 | |a Großbritannien |0 (DE-588)4022153-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
651 | 7 | |a Italien |0 (DE-588)4027833-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Europäischer Gerichtshof |0 (DE-588)5103273-9 |D b |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Entscheidung |0 (DE-588)4014904-3 |D s |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Verwaltungsrecht |0 (DE-588)4063351-2 |D s |
689 | 0 | 3 | |a Deutschland |0 (DE-588)4011882-4 |D g |
689 | 0 | 4 | |a Italien |0 (DE-588)4027833-5 |D g |
689 | 0 | 5 | |a Großbritannien |0 (DE-588)4022153-2 |D g |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m GBV Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=017059860&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-017059860 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1820157984175554560 |
---|---|
adam_text |
EUROPEANISATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE? THE INFLUENCE OF THE ECJ'S
CASE LAW IN ITALY, GERMANY AND ENGLAND MARIOLINA ELIANTONIO CONTENTS
PREFACE V CONTENTS VII LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS XIII OVERVIEW OFENGLISH
TERMINOLOGY XIX INTRODUCTION 1 SETTING THE SCENE: THE INFLUENCE OF
EUROPEAN LAW ON NATIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE LAW 3 2 NATIONAL REMEDIES BEFORE
THE ECJ 5 3 EUROPEANISATION, CONVERGENCE AND HARMONISATION N 4 THE ROLE
OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS (ECHR) 14 5 THE SELECTED
LEGAL SYSTEMS 16 6 SOME METHODOLOGICAL AND TERMINOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS
24 7 OUTLINE OF THE BOOK 25 CHAPTER 1 THE POSSIBILITY OF CHALLENGING AN
ADMINISTRATIVE MEASURE BEFORE A COURT 1 INTRODUCTION 29 2 THE ECJ'S CASE
LAW 29 2.1 INTRODUCTION 29 2.2 THE RIGHT TO JUDICIAL PROTECTION 30 2.3
THE RESTRICTION TO THE ACCESS TO COURT IN CASES OF PREPARATORY MEASURES
ISSUED IN THE CONTEXT OF MIXED ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION-MAKING
PROCEEDINGS 32 2.4 CONCLUSION 34 3 ITALIAN LAW 35 3.1 THE ITALIAN RULES
CONCERNING THE POSSIBILITY OF CHALLENGING AN ACT BEFORE THE
ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS 35 3.2 ASSESSMENT OF THE COMPLIANCE OF THE
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURAL SYSTEM WITH THE ECJ'S JUDGMENTS 37 3.3
APPLICATION OF THE STANDARDS SET OUT IN THE ECJ'S JUDGMENTS BY THE
ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS IN CASES DEALING WITH 'EUROPEAN MATTERS' 38 3.4
CONCLUSION 42 4 GERMAN LAW 42 4.1 THE GERMAN RULES CONCERNING THE
POSSIBILITY OF CHALLENGING AN ACT BEFORE THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS 42
4.2 ASSESSMENT OF THE COMPLIANCE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURAL SYSTEM
WITH THE ECJ'S JUDGMENTS 48 4.3 APPLICATION OF THE STANDARDS SET OUT IN
THE ECJ'S JUDGMENTS BY THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS IN CASES DEALING WITH
'EUROPEAN MATTERS' 49 4.4 CONCLUSION 53 5 ENGLISH LAW 53 EUROPEANISATION
OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE' 5.1 THE ENGLISH RULES CONCERNING THE
POSSIBILITY OF CHALLENGING AN ACT IN JUDICIAL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS 53 5.2
ASSESSMENT OF THE COMPLIANCE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURAL SYSTEM
WITH THE ECJ'S AND ECTHR'S JUDGMENTS 61 5.3 CONCLUSION 62 6 COMPARATIVE
CONCLUSION 64 TABLE 1: THE POSSIBILITY OF CHALLENGING AN ADMINISTRATIVE
MEASURE BEFORE A COURT 67 CHAPTER 2 TIME LIMITS FOR CHALLENGING THE
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION BEFORE A COURT 1 INTRODUCTION 71 2 THE ECJ'S CASE
LAW 72 2.1 THE INITIAL PERIOD - DEFERENCE TO NATIONAL TIME LIMITS 72 2.2
EMMOTT 7 2 2.3 'POST-EMMOTT' CASE LAW 74 2.4 IS EMMOTT STILL ALIVE? 78
2.5 CONCLUSION 82 3 ITALIAN LAW 83 3.1 THE ITALIAN RULES ON TIME LIMITS
FOR BRINGING A CLAIM BEFORE AN ADMINISTRATIVE COURT 83 3.2 ASSESSMENT OF
THE COMPLIANCE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURAL SYSTEM WITH THE ECJ'S
JUDGMENTS 86 3.3 APPLICATION OF THE STANDARDS SET OUT IN THE ECJ'S
JUDGMENTS BY THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS IN CASES DEALING WITH 'EUROPEAN
MATTERS' 88 3.4 CONCLUSION 94 4 GERMAN LAW 96 4.1 THE GERMAN RULES ON
TIME LIMITS FOR BRINGING A CLAIM BEFORE AN ADMINISTRATIVE COURT 96 4.2
ASSESSMENT OF THE COMPLIANCE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURAL SYSTEM
WITH THE ECJ'S JUDGMENTS 98 4.3 APPLICATION OF THE STANDARDS SET OUT IN
THE ECJ'S JUDGMENTS BY THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS IN CASES DEALING WITH
'EUROPEAN MATTERS' 101 4.4 CONCLUSION 105 5 ENGLISH LAW 106 5.1 THE
ENGLISH RULES ON TIME LIMITS FOR BRINGING A CLAIM FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
106 5.2 ASSESSMENT OF THE COMPLIANCE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURAL
SYSTEM WITH THE ECJ'S AND THE ECTHR'S JUDGMENTS "3 5.3 APPLICATION OF
THE STANDARDS SET OUT IN THE ECJ'S JUDGMENTS BY THE ADMINISTRATIVE
COURTS IN CASES DEALING WITH 'EUROPEAN MATTERS' 115 5-4 THE REQUIREMENT
OF 'PROMPTNESS' SCRUTINISED FOR ITS COMPLIANCE WITH EC AND ECHR LAW IN
CASES INVOLVING PURELY DOMESTIC SITUATIONS N 7 5.5 CONCLUSION ,, 9 6
COMPARATIVE CONCLUSION 121 TABLE 2: TIME LIMITS FOR CHALLENGING THE
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION BEFORE A COURT ,24 CHAPTER 3 THE DUTY OF NATIONAL
COURTS TO RAISE EX OFFICIO POINTS OF ECLAW 1 INTRODUCTION 129 2 THE
ECJ'S CASE LAW 130 2.1 INTRODUCTION 130 2.2 VAN SCHIJNDEL 130 2.3
PETERBROECK 132 2.4 TWO DIFFERENT OUTCOMES FOR TWO SIMILAR CASES? 134
2.5 THE SUBSEQUENT CASE LAW 136 2.6 CONCLUSION 141 3 ITALIAN LAW 143 3.1
THE ITALIAN RULES ON THE EX OFFICIO POWERS OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS
143 3.2 ASSESSMENT OF THE COMPLIANCE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURAL
SYSTEM WITH THE ECJ'S JUDGMENTS 146 3.3 APPLICATION OF THE STANDARDS SET
OUT IN THE ECJ'S JUDGMENTS BY THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS IN CASES DEALING
WITH 'EUROPEAN MATTERS' 147 3.4 THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE ECJ'S CASE LAW
TO THE BROADENING OF THE EX OFFICIO POWERS OF ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS IN
CASES INVOLVING PURELY DOMESTIC SITUATIONS 152 3.5 CONCLUSION 159 4
GERMAN LAW 160 4.1 THE GERMAN RULES ON THE EX OFFICIO POWERS OF THE
ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS 160 4.2 ASSESSMENT OF THE COMPLIANCE OF THE
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURAL SYSTEM WITH THE ECJ'S JUDGMENTS 164 4.3
CONCLUSION 165 5 ENGLISH LAW 166 5.1 THE ENGLISH RULES ON THE EX OFFICIO
POWERS OF THE COURTS IN JUDICIAL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS 166 5.2 ASSESSMENT
OF THE COMPLIANCE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURAL SYSTEM WITH THE ECJ'S
JUDGMENTS 168 5.3 CONCLUSION 169 6 COMPARATIVE CONCLUSION 169 TABLE 3:
THE DUTY OF NATIONAL COURTS TO RAISE EX OFFICIO POINTS OFECLAW '72
EUROPEANISATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE? CHAPTER 4 I 2 2.1 2.2 3 3 1
3.2 3-3 3-4 3-5 3-6 4 4.1 4.2 4-3 5 5- 1 5.2 5-3 5-4 5-5 6 THE EVIDENCE
REGIME APPLICABLE IN CLAIMS BEFORE ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS INTRODUCTION
177 THE ECJ'S CASE LAW 177 NATIONAL PROCEDURAL AUTONOMY, SUBJECT TO THE
PRINCIPLES OF EQUIVALENCE AND EFFECTIVENESS 177 CONCLUSION 181 ITALIAN
LAW 181 THE ITALIAN RULES OF EVIDENCE APPLICABLE BEFORE ADMINISTRATIVE
COURTS 181 ASSESSMENT OF THE COMPLIANCE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURAL
SYSTEM WITH THE ECJ'S JUDGMENTS 188 APPLICATION OF THE STANDARDS SET OUT
IN THE ECJ'S JUDGMENTS BY THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS IN CASES DEALING
WITH 'EUROPEAN MATTERS' 189 THE RELIANCE ON THE ECHR AND THE GENERAL
PRINCIPLES OF EC LAW FOR THE ADMISSION OF THE CTU BY THE ADMINISTRATIVE
COURTS IN CASES INVOLVING PURELY DOMESTIC SITUATIONS 190 THE ADMISSION
OF THE CTU BY WAY OF LEGISLATIVE REFORM 194 CONCLUSION 196 GERMAN LAW
197 THE GERMAN RULES OF EVIDENCE APPLICABLE BEFORE ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS
197 ASSESSMENT OF THE COMPLIANCE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURAL SYSTEM
WITH THE ECJ'S JUDGMENTS 201 CONCLUSION 202 ENGLISH LAW 203 THE ENGLISH
RULES OF EVIDENCE APPLICABLE IN JUDICIAL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS 203
ASSESSMENT OF THE COMPLIANCE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURAL SYSTEM
WITH THE ECJ'S JUDGMENTS 209 APPLICATION OF THE STANDARDS SET OUT IN THE
ECJ'S JUDGMENTS BY THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS IN CASES DEALING WITH
'EUROPEAN MATTERS' 212 THE RELIANCE ON THE ECHR FOR THE ADMISSION OF
CROSS- EXAMINATION IN JUDICIAL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS IN CASES INVOLVING
PURELY DOMESTIC SITUATIONS 214 CONCLUSION 216 COMPARATIVE CONCLUSION 218
TABLE 4: EVIDENCE REGIME APPLICABLE IN CLAIMS BEFORE ADMINISTRATIVE
COURTS 221 CHAPTER 5 1 2 INTERIM RELIEF BEFORE ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS
INTRODUCTION THE ECJ'S CASE LAW 225 226 2.1 INTRODUCTION 22 6 2.2 THE
RIGHT TO OBTAIN INTERIM RELIEF 227 2.2.1 'FACTORTAME CASES' 227 2.2.2 '
ZUCKERFABRIK CASES' 229 2.2.3 T. PORT: THE OUTER LIMITS OF THE POWER TO
GRANT INTERIM PROTECTION 232 2.3 TYPES OF INTERIM RELIEF THAT CAN BE
GRANTED 233 2.3.1 'FACTORTAME CASES' 233 2.3.2 'ZUCKERFABRIK CASES' 233
2.4 CONCLUSION 235 3 ITALIAN LAW 235 3.1 THE ITALIAN RULES ON INTERIM
RELIEF BEFORE ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS 235 3.2 ASSESSMENT OF THE COMPLIANCE
OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURAL SYSTEM WITH THE ECJ'S JUDGMENTS 245 3.3
APPLICATION OF THE STANDARDS SET OUT IN THE ECJ'S JUDGMENTS BY THE
ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS IN CASES DEALING WITH 'EUROPEAN MATTERS' 245 3.4
APPLICATION OF THE STANDARDS SET OUT IN THE ECJ'S JUDGMENTS BY THE
ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS IN CASES INVOLVING PURELY DOMESTIC SITUATIONS 248
3.5 THE ADMISSION OF THE POSSIBILITY OF ISSUING POSITIVE INTERIM
MEASURES BY WAY OF LEGISLATIVE REFORM 251 3.6 CONCLUSION 252 4 GERMAN
LAW 253 4.1 THE GERMAN RULES ON INTERIM RELIEF BEFORE ADMINISTRATIVE
COURTS 253 4.2 ASSESSMENT OF THE COMPLIANCE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE
PROCEDURAL SYSTEM WITH THE ECJ'S JUDGMENTS 259 4.3 CONCLUSION 260 5
ENGLISH LAW 261 5.1 THE ENGLISH RULES ON INTERIM RELIEF IN JUDICIAL
REVIEW PROCEEDINGS 261 5.2 ASSESSMENT OF THE COMPLIANCE OF THE
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURAL SYSTEM WITH THE ECJ'S JUDGMENTS 272 5.3
APPLICATION OF THE STANDARDS SET OUT IN THE ECJ'S JUDGMENTS BY THE
ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS IN CASES DEALING WITH 'EUROPEAN MATTERS' 273 5.4
APPLICATION OF THE STANDARDS SET OUT IN THE ECJ'S JUDGMENTS BY THE
ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS IN CASES INVOLVING PURELY DOMESTIC SITUATIONS 275
5.5 CONCLUSION 278 6 COMPARATIVE CONCLUSION 280 TABLE 5: INTERIM RELIEF
BEFORE ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS 283 EUROPEANISATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE
JUSTICE? CHAPTER 6 EUROPEANISATION, CONVERGENCE AND HARMONISATION OF THE
SYSTEMS OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE 1 INTRODUCTION 287 2 THE DEGREE OF
EUROPEANISATION OF THE SYSTEMS OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE 288 2.1 AN
ANALYSIS BASED UPON THE FIVE SELECTED AREAS OF INFLUENCE 288 2.2 AN
ANALYSIS BASED UPON THE THREE SELECTED LEGAL SYSTEMS 292 2.3 CONCLUSION
294 3 THE PROCESS OF CONVERGENCE OF THE SYSTEMS OF ADMINISTRATIVE
JUSTICE AND ROLE OF THE ECJ'S CASE LAW 295 3.1 THE'ECJ-INDUCED'PROCESS
OF CONVERGENCE 295 3.2 OTHER FACTORS FOR THE PROCESS OF CONVERGENCE 297
3.3 CONCLUSION 298 4 THE NEED FOR HARMONISATION OF THE RULES FOR THE
DECENTRALISED ENFORCEMENT OF COMMUNITY LAW 299 4.1 INTRODUCTION 299 4.2
THE POSSIBILITY AND DESIRABILITY OF HARMONISED PROCEDURAL RULES
APPLICABLE TO THE JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION 300 4.3 THE
CHOICE OF THE LEGAL INSTRUMENT 37 5 CONCLUSION 308 TABLE 6: THE
EUROPEANISATION OF THE SYSTEMS OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE 3 10 TABLE 7:
THE CONVERGENCE OF THE SYSTEMS OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE 3 11 CONCLUSION
315 BIBLIOGRAPHY 332 LIST OF CASES 366 LIST OF LEGISLATIVE INSTRUMENTS
39 2 SUMMARY 396 SAMENVATTING 4 ZUSAMMENFASSUNG 44 RIASSUNTO 4 8
GEARFETTING 4 12 CURRICULUM VITAE 4^ |
any_adam_object | 1 |
author | Eliantonio, Mariolina |
author_facet | Eliantonio, Mariolina |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Eliantonio, Mariolina |
author_variant | m e me |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV035254254 |
callnumber-first | K - Law |
callnumber-label | KJC5647 |
callnumber-raw | KJC5647 KJE5602 |
callnumber-search | KJC5647 KJE5602 |
callnumber-sort | KJC 45647 |
classification_rvk | PS 2960 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)262433621 (DE-599)BSZ288422562 |
dewey-full | 349 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 349 - Law of specific jurisdictions & areas |
dewey-raw | 349 |
dewey-search | 349 |
dewey-sort | 3349 |
dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a22000002c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV035254254</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20090303</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">090119s2009 xx |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789076871974</subfield><subfield code="9">978-90-7687-197-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9076871973</subfield><subfield code="9">90-7687-197-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)262433621</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BSZ288422562</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KJC5647</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KJE5602</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">349</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PS 2960</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139745:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Eliantonio, Mariolina</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Europeanisation of administrative justice?</subfield><subfield code="b">the influence of the ECJ's case law in Italy, Germany and England</subfield><subfield code="c">Mariolina Eliantonio</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Groningen</subfield><subfield code="b">Europa Law Publ.</subfield><subfield code="c">2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XX, 416 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Zsfassungen in niederländ., dt., ital. und fries. Sprache</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Europäischer Gerichtshof</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5103273-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Administrative courts</subfield><subfield code="z">European Union countries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Administrative courts</subfield><subfield code="z">Germany</subfield><subfield code="v">Rules and practice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Administrative courts</subfield><subfield code="z">Great Britain</subfield><subfield code="v">Rules and practice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Administrative courts</subfield><subfield code="z">Italy</subfield><subfield code="v">Rules and practice</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judicial review of administrative acts</subfield><subfield code="z">European Union countries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judicial review of administrative acts</subfield><subfield code="z">Germany</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judicial review of administrative acts</subfield><subfield code="z">Great Britain</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Judicial review of administrative acts</subfield><subfield code="z">Italy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Verwaltungsrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4063351-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Entscheidung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4014904-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Deutschland</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Großbritannien</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Italien</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Deutschland</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4011882-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Großbritannien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4022153-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Italien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4027833-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Europäischer Gerichtshof</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)5103273-9</subfield><subfield code="D">b</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Entscheidung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4014904-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Verwaltungsrecht</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4063351-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Deutschland</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4011882-4</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Italien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4027833-5</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="5"><subfield code="a">Großbritannien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4022153-2</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">GBV Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=017059860&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-017059860</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | Deutschland Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten Großbritannien Italien Deutschland (DE-588)4011882-4 gnd Großbritannien (DE-588)4022153-2 gnd Italien (DE-588)4027833-5 gnd |
geographic_facet | Deutschland Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten Großbritannien Italien |
id | DE-604.BV035254254 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
indexdate | 2025-01-02T17:11:59Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9789076871974 9076871973 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-017059860 |
oclc_num | 262433621 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-29 DE-12 |
owner_facet | DE-29 DE-12 |
physical | XX, 416 S. |
publishDate | 2009 |
publishDateSearch | 2009 |
publishDateSort | 2009 |
publisher | Europa Law Publ. |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Eliantonio, Mariolina Verfasser aut Europeanisation of administrative justice? the influence of the ECJ's case law in Italy, Germany and England Mariolina Eliantonio Groningen Europa Law Publ. 2009 XX, 416 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Zsfassungen in niederländ., dt., ital. und fries. Sprache Europäischer Gerichtshof (DE-588)5103273-9 gnd rswk-swf Administrative courts European Union countries Administrative courts Germany Rules and practice Administrative courts Great Britain Rules and practice Administrative courts Italy Rules and practice Judicial review of administrative acts European Union countries Judicial review of administrative acts Germany Judicial review of administrative acts Great Britain Judicial review of administrative acts Italy Verwaltungsrecht (DE-588)4063351-2 gnd rswk-swf Entscheidung (DE-588)4014904-3 gnd rswk-swf Deutschland Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten Großbritannien Italien Deutschland (DE-588)4011882-4 gnd rswk-swf Großbritannien (DE-588)4022153-2 gnd rswk-swf Italien (DE-588)4027833-5 gnd rswk-swf Europäischer Gerichtshof (DE-588)5103273-9 b Entscheidung (DE-588)4014904-3 s Verwaltungsrecht (DE-588)4063351-2 s Deutschland (DE-588)4011882-4 g Italien (DE-588)4027833-5 g Großbritannien (DE-588)4022153-2 g DE-604 GBV Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=017059860&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
spellingShingle | Eliantonio, Mariolina Europeanisation of administrative justice? the influence of the ECJ's case law in Italy, Germany and England Europäischer Gerichtshof (DE-588)5103273-9 gnd Administrative courts European Union countries Administrative courts Germany Rules and practice Administrative courts Great Britain Rules and practice Administrative courts Italy Rules and practice Judicial review of administrative acts European Union countries Judicial review of administrative acts Germany Judicial review of administrative acts Great Britain Judicial review of administrative acts Italy Verwaltungsrecht (DE-588)4063351-2 gnd Entscheidung (DE-588)4014904-3 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)5103273-9 (DE-588)4063351-2 (DE-588)4014904-3 (DE-588)4011882-4 (DE-588)4022153-2 (DE-588)4027833-5 |
title | Europeanisation of administrative justice? the influence of the ECJ's case law in Italy, Germany and England |
title_auth | Europeanisation of administrative justice? the influence of the ECJ's case law in Italy, Germany and England |
title_exact_search | Europeanisation of administrative justice? the influence of the ECJ's case law in Italy, Germany and England |
title_full | Europeanisation of administrative justice? the influence of the ECJ's case law in Italy, Germany and England Mariolina Eliantonio |
title_fullStr | Europeanisation of administrative justice? the influence of the ECJ's case law in Italy, Germany and England Mariolina Eliantonio |
title_full_unstemmed | Europeanisation of administrative justice? the influence of the ECJ's case law in Italy, Germany and England Mariolina Eliantonio |
title_short | Europeanisation of administrative justice? |
title_sort | europeanisation of administrative justice the influence of the ecj s case law in italy germany and england |
title_sub | the influence of the ECJ's case law in Italy, Germany and England |
topic | Europäischer Gerichtshof (DE-588)5103273-9 gnd Administrative courts European Union countries Administrative courts Germany Rules and practice Administrative courts Great Britain Rules and practice Administrative courts Italy Rules and practice Judicial review of administrative acts European Union countries Judicial review of administrative acts Germany Judicial review of administrative acts Great Britain Judicial review of administrative acts Italy Verwaltungsrecht (DE-588)4063351-2 gnd Entscheidung (DE-588)4014904-3 gnd |
topic_facet | Europäischer Gerichtshof Administrative courts European Union countries Administrative courts Germany Rules and practice Administrative courts Great Britain Rules and practice Administrative courts Italy Rules and practice Judicial review of administrative acts European Union countries Judicial review of administrative acts Germany Judicial review of administrative acts Great Britain Judicial review of administrative acts Italy Verwaltungsrecht Entscheidung Deutschland Europäische Union. Mitgliedsstaaten Großbritannien Italien |
url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=017059860&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eliantoniomariolina europeanisationofadministrativejusticetheinfluenceoftheecjscaselawinitalygermanyandengland |