United States antitrust law and economics:
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
New York
Foundation Press
2008
|
Schriftenreihe: | University casebook series
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Beschreibung: | XXI, 708 S. |
ISBN: | 9781599414959 1599414953 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV035067204 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20090204 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 080924s2008 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 9781599414959 |9 978-1-59941-495-9 | ||
020 | |a 1599414953 |9 1-59941-495-3 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)231588188 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV035067204 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-M382 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Elhauge, Einer |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a United States antitrust law and economics |c by Einer Elhauge |
264 | 1 | |a New York |b Foundation Press |c 2008 | |
300 | |a XXI, 708 S. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a University casebook series | |
650 | 4 | |a Antitrust law / Economic aspects / United States | |
651 | 4 | |a USA | |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m GBV Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016735630&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016735630 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804138013921378304 |
---|---|
adam_text | UNITED STATES ANTITRUST LAW AND ECONOMICS BY ELNER ELHAUGE PETRIE
PROFESSOR OF LAW, HARVARD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION PRESS THOMSON
^ANNIVERSARY] WEST TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CASES XIII CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION 1 A. THE FRAMEWORK OF LEGAL ISSUES RAISED BY BASIC
ANTITRUST ECO- NOMICS 1 B. AN OVERVIEW OF U.S. ANTITRUST LAWS AND
REMEDIAL STRUCTURE * 10 CHAPTER 2 WHICH HORIZONTAL AGREEMENTS ARE
ILLEGAL? 48 A. RELEVANT U.S. LAWS AND GENERAL LEGAL STANDARDS 48 SHERMAN
ACT § 1, 15 U.S.C. § 1 48 SHERMAN ACT § 2, 15 U.S.C. § 2 51 FEDERAL
TRADE COMMISSION ACT § 5, 15 U.S.C. § 45 52 B. HORIZONTAL PRICE-FIXING
52 UNITED STATES V. TRENTON POTTERIES--- 52 QUESTIONS ON TRENTON
POTTERIES 54 BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. (BMI) V. COLUMBIA BROADCASTING SYSTEM
55 QUESTIONS ON BMI 63 ARIZONA V. MARICOPA COUNTY MEDICAL SOC Y 65
QUESTIONS ON MARICOPA 72 TEXACO INC. V. DAGHER - 74 QUESTIONS ON TEXACO
V. DAGHER 76 C. HORIZONTAL OUTPUT RESTRICTIONS 77 NCAA V. BOARD OF
REGENTS OF UNIV. OF OKLAHOMA 7 7 QUESTIONS ON NCAA 85 D. HORIZONTAL
MARKET DIVISIONS- 86 PALMER V. BRG 87 QUESTIONS ON PALMER V. BRG *- 88
U.S. DOJ/PTC, ANTITRUST GUIDELINES FOR COLLABORATIONS AMONG COMPETITORS
91 QUESTIONS ON FTC-DOJ GUIDELINES 93 E. HORIZONTAL AGREEMENTS NOT TO
DEAL WITH PARTICULAR FIRMS 94 1. BOYCOTTS BY UNRELATED RIVALS 95 KLOR S
INC. V. BROADWAY-HALE STORES, INC 95 QUESTIONS ON KLOR S 97 FASHION
ORIGINATORS GUILD OF AM. U. FTC 97 QUESTIONS ON FASHION ORIGINATORS
100 2. EXCLUSIONS OR EXPULSIONS FROM A PRODUCTIVE COLLABORATION OF
RIVALS 101 UNITED STATES V. TERMINAL RAILROAD ASS N 101 ASSOCIATED PRESS
V. UNITED STATES 105 QUESTIONS ON TERMINAL RR AND ASSOCIATED PRESS 107
NORTHWEST WHOLESALE STATIONERS V. PACIFIC STATIONERY 109 QUESTIONS ON
NORTHWEST STATIONERS - 113 VI TABLE OF CONTENTS F. ARE SOCIAL WELFARE
JUSTIFICATIONS ADMISSIBLE? 114 NATIONAL SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEERS V. UNITED STATES 115 QUESTIONS ON PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS 120
FTC V. INDIANA FEDERATION OF DENTISTS 122 QUESTIONS ON INDIANA DENTISTS
126 FTC V. SUPERIOR COURT TRIAL LAWYERS ASS N 12 7 QUESTIONS ON TRIAL
LAWYER S ASS N 131 CALIFORNIA DENTAL ASS N V. FTC 132 QUESTIONS ON
CALIFORNIA DENTAL 140 NOTE ON BURDENS AND ORDERS OF THEORY AND PROOF
AFTER CALIFORNIA DENTAL 141 NOTE ON THE POLICY RELEVANCE OF NONPROFIT
STATUS 142 NOTE ON THE LEGAL TREATMENT OF NONPROFITS UNDER U.S.
ANTITRUST LAW - 143 UNITED STATES V. BROWN UNIVERSITY * 144 QUESTIONS ON
UNITED STATES V. BROWN 151 G. DOES INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW JUSTIFY AN
ANTICOMPETITIVE RE- STRAINT? 153 UNITED STATES V. GENERAL ELECTRIC - 155
QUESTIONS ON GENERAL ELECTRIC 156 UNITED STATES V. NEW WRINKLE, INC 158
QUESTIONS ON NEW WRINKLE 160 U.S. DOJ/FTC, ANTITRUST GUIDELINES FOR THE
LICENSING OF INTELLEC- TUAL PROPERTY (1995) ----- 161 QUESTIONS ON THE
U.S. GUIDELINES 169 H. BUYER CARTELS --- 169 MANDEVILLE ISLAND FARMS V.
AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR 169 QUESTIONS ON MANDEVILLE-- 173 NOTE ON
COUNTERVAILING POWER AND THE PROBLEM OF THE SECOND BEST *- 174 CHAPTER 3
WHAT UNILATERAL CONDUCT IS ILLEGAL? - 178 A. RELEVANT LAWS & BASIC LEGAL
ELEMENTS * 178 SHERMAN ACT § 2, 15 U.S.C. § 2 - 178 FEDERAL TRADE
COMMISSION ACT § 5, 15 U.S.C. § 45 179 ROBINSON-PATMAN ACT, 15 U.S.C. §
13(A) 180 B. THE POWER ELEMENT * 183 1. ECONOMIC AND LEGAL TESTS OF
MARKET POWER GENERALLY 184 2. LEGAL TESTS OF MONOPOLY POWER OR A
DOMINANT POSITION 191 3. MARKET DEFINITION 192 UNITED STATES V. DU PONT
& CO. (THE CELLOPHANE CASE) 193 QUESTIONS ON DU PONT (THE CELLOPHANE
CASE) - 199 U.S. DOJ/FTC, HORIZONTAL MERGER GUIDELINES - 202 NOTES AND
QUESTIONS ON THE U.S. MARKET DEFINITION GUIDELINES 207 NOTE ON TECHNICAL
METHODS USED IN MARKET DEFINITION 212 4. AFTERMARKETS - 216 EASTMAN
KODAK V. IMAGE TECHNICAL SERVS * 216 QUESTIONS ON KODAK 224 C. SECOND
ELEMENT: ANTICOMPETITIVE CONDUCT 225 1. GENERAL STANDARDS 225 2.
PREDATORY PRICING 228 A. BELOW-COST PREDATORY PRICING 228 BROOKE GROUP
LTD. (LIGGETT) V. BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBAC- CO CORP 228 TABLE OF
CONTENTS VIL NOTE AND QUESTIONS ABOUT BROOKE--- 237 NOTE ON U.S.
CONFLICT ON THE PROPER COST MEASURE -. 240 ELHAUGE, WHY ABOVE-COST PRICE
CUTS TO DRIVE OUT ENTRANTS DO NOT SIGNAL PREDATION OR EVEN MARKET POWER
* AND THE IMPLICATIONS FOR DEFINING COSTS 241 B. ABOVE-COST PREDATORY
PRICING - 243 ENFORCEMENT POLICY REGARDING UNFAIR EXCLUSIONARY CONDUCT
IN THE AIR TRANSPORTATION INDUSTRY -... -.. 244 NOTE AND QUESTIONS ON
THE PROPOSED U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENFORCED POLICY -~- ~-
246 UNITED STATES V. AMR CORP * 247 QUESTIONS ON AMERICAN AIRLINES - 250
NOTE ON PRICE DISCRIMINATION - ~~ 251 3. EXCLUSIONS FROM OWNED
PROPERTY-UNILATERAL REFUSALS TO DEAL.. 253 OTTER TAIL POWER COMPANY V.
UNITED STATES- - 254 QUESTIONS ON OTTER TAIL -* - 259 ASPEN SKIING CO.
V. ASPEN HIGHLANDS SKIING CORP. 263 QUESTIONS ON ASPEN SKIING ~~ 270
EASTMAN KODAK V. IMAGE TECHNICAL SERVS. 273 QUESTIONS ON THE KODAK DUTY
TO DEAL WITH RIVALS - 2 75 VERIZON COMMUN. V. LAW OFFICES OF CURTIS V.
TRINKO *. 276 QUESTIONS ON VERIZON V. TRINKO - 282 EINER ELHAUGE,
DEFINING BETTER MONOPOLIZATION STANDARDS 283 NOTE ON THE U.S. ESSENTIAL
FACILITIES DOCTRINE 284 NOTE ON APPLICATION OF U.S. ANTITRUST DUTIES TO
DEAL TO INTEL- LECTUAL PROPERTY - 286 4. PRICE SQUEEZES AND PREDATORY
OVERPAYING *. 287 TOWN OF CONCORD V. BOSTON EDISON CO 288 QUESTIONS ON
TOWN OF CONCORD 296 WEYERHAEUSER CO. V. ROSS-SIMMONS HARDWOOD LUMBER 297
NOTE AND QUESTIONS ON WEYERHAEUSER 301 D. CAUSAL CONNECTION BETWEEN
FIRST AND SECOND ELEMENTS REQUIRED? 302 EINER ELHAUGE, DEFINING BETTER
MONOPOLIZATION STANDARDS 302 NOTE ON MONOPOLY LEVERAGING -- 303 E.
ATTEMPTED MONOPOLIZATION *. 304 LORAIN JOURNAL V. UNITED STATES 30 4
QUESTIONS ON LORAIN JOURNAL 306 UNITED STATES V. AMERICAN AIRLINES 306
QUESTIONS ON AMERICAN AIRLINES ATTEMPTED CARTEL CASE 309 SPECTRUM SPORTS
V. MCQUILLAN 309 NOTE AND QUESTIONS ON SPECTRUM SPORTS 312 CHAPTER 4
VERTICAL AGREEMENTS THAT RESTRICT DEALING WITH RIVALS - - - - 314 A.
INTRODUCTION * - 314 CLAYTON ACT § 3, 15 U.S.C. § 14- - - - 315 B.
EXCLUSIVE DEALING - ----- * 316 UNITED STATES V. GRIFFITH * - - 321 NOTE
ON GRIFFITH AND LORAIN JOURNAL 324 STANDARD FASHION V. MAGRANE-HOUSTON -
- - 325 QUESTIONS ON STANDARD FASHION - 326 STANDARD OIL AND STANDARD
STATIONS V. UNITED STATES 326 QUESTIONS ON STANDARD STATIONS - - - ---
331 VIII TABLE OF CONTENTS FTC V. MOTION PICTURE ADVERTISING SERVICE 333
NOTE ON CUMULATIVE FORECLOSURE 335 TAMPA ELECTRIC V. NASHVILLE COAL 337
NOTE AND QUESTIONS ON TAMPA ELECTRIC 341 UNITED STATES V. MICROSOFT 342
NOTE ON THE U.S. LOWER COURT SPLITS ON FORECLOSURE THRESHOLDS AND
TERMINABILITY RELEVANCE 348 QUESTIONS ON MICROSOFT S EXCLUSIVE DEALING
HOLDINGS 349 C. TYING 350 UNITED SHOE MACHINERY V. UNITED STATES 36 1
QUESTIONS ON UNITED SHOE TYING CASE 363 INTERNATIONAL SALT V. UNITED
STATES 363 QUESTIONS ON INTERNATIONAL SALT 365 TIMES-PICAYUNE PUBLISHING
V. UNITED STATES 366 QUESTIONS ON TIMES-PICAYUNE 371 JEFFERSON PARISH
HOSPITAL V. HYDE 373 QUESTIONS ON JEFFERSON PARISH 383 EASTMAN KODAK V.
IMAGE TECHNICAL SERVS 386 QUESTIONS ON KODAK 392 ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS
INC. V. INDEPENDENT INK, INC 393 QUESTIONS ON ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS 397
UNITED STATES V. MICROSOFT 398 QUESTIONS ON U.S. MICROSOFT CASE HOLDINGS
ON TYING 405 D. LOYALTY AND BUNDLED DISCOUNTS 406 UNITED STATES V.
LOEW S INC 416 QUESTIONS ON LOEW S 418 FTC V. BROWN SHOE * 419 QUESTIONS
ON FTC V. BROWN SHOE 421 CONCORD BOAT V. BRUNSWICK CORP. 421 QUESTIONS
ON CONCORD BOAT 424 LEPAGE S INC. V. 3M 425 QUESTIONS ON LEPAGE S 431
CASCADE HEALTH SOLUTIONS V. PEACEHEALTH 432 QUESTIONS ON CASCADE HEALTH
438 NOTE ON THE U.S. LOWER COURT SPLITS ON LOYALTY AND BUNDLED DISCOUNTS
439 CHAPTER 5 AGREEMENTS AND CONDUCT THAT ARGUABLY DIS- TORT DOWNSTREAM
COMPETITION IN DISTRIBUTING A SUPPLI- ER S PRODUCTS 44 1 A. INTRODUCTION
441 B. INTRABRAND DISTRIBUTIONAL RESTRAINTS ON RESALE 444 1. VERTICAL
NONPRICE RESTRAINTS ON DISTRIBUTION 445 CONTINENTAL T.V. V. GTE SYLVANIA
446 QUESTIONS ON SYLVANIA 452 2. VERTICAL MAXIMUM PRICE-FIXING 453 STATE
OIL CO. V. KHAN 455 QUESTIONS ON STATE OIL V. KHAN 460 3. VERTICAL
AGREEMENTS FIXING MINIMUM RESALE PRICES 460 LEEGIN CREATIVE LEATHER
PRODUCTS V. PSKS, INC. -.. 460 NOTES AND QUESTIONS ON LEEGIN 479 TABLE
OF CONTENTS IX 4. HOW TO CHARACTERIZE AGREEMENTS 482 A. ARE DUAL
DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENTS VERTICAL OR HORIZONTAL? - 482 B. VERTICAL
AGREEMENTS TO BOYCOTT THE RIVAL OF A DEALER WITHOUT ANY PROCOMPETITIVE
JUSTIFICATION 484 NYNEXV. DISCON *. 484 QUESTIONS ON NYNEX V. DISCON 487
C. PRICE DISCRIMINATION THAT ARGUABLY DISTORTS DOWNSTREAM COMPE- TITION
487 ROBINSON-PATMAN ACT § 2, 15 U.S.C. § 13 488 FTC V. MORTON SALT CO
489 QUESTIONS ON MORTON SALT 493 TEXACO V. HASBROUCK 494 QUESTIONS ON
TEXACO V. HASBROUCK 499 VOLVO TRUCKS N.A. V. REEDER-SIMCO GMC 500
QUESTIONS ON VOLVO 504 NOTE ON OTHER ROBINSON-PATMAN ACT PROVISIONS *
506 CHAPTER 6 PROVING AN AGREEMENT OR CONCERTED ACTION 50 7 A. ARE THE
DEFENDANTS SEPARATE ENTITIES? 507 COPPERWELD CORP. V. INDEPENDENCE TUBE
CORP 507 QUESTIONS ON COPPERWELD * 511 NOTE ON AGENCY RELATIONS 513 B.
STANDARDS FOR FINDING A VERTICAL AGREEMENT * 514 MONSANTO CO. V.
SPRAY-RITE SERVICE CORP 515 QUESTIONS ON MONSANTO *- 518 C. STANDARDS
FOR FINDING A HORIZONTAL AGREEMENT OR CONCERTED AC- TION* *- 520 1.
PARALLEL CONDUCT EQUALLY CONSISTENT WITH AN INDEPENDENT MOTIVE* -* 521
THEATRE ENTERPRISES V. PARAMOUNT FILM DISTRIBUTING 521 QUESTIONS ON
THEATRE ENTERPRISES *- 523 MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC V. ZENITH RADIO 523
QUESTIONS ON MATSUSHITA 528 CEMENT MANUFACTURERS PROTECTIVE ASS N V. U.S
529 QUESTIONS ON CEMENT MANUFACTURERS 531 2. PARALLEL CONDUCT THAT WOULD
BE UNPROFITABLE IF NOT ENGAGED IN BY OTHER FIRMS 531 A. WHEN PARALLEL
CONDUCT IS IMPLAUSIBLE WITHOUT AN EXPLICIT AGREEMENT * 531 EASTERN
STATES RETAIL LUMBER DEALERS ASS N V. U.S 531 QUESTIONS ON EASTERN
STATES LUMBER 533 AMERICAN COLUMN & LUMBER V. UNITED STATES 533
QUESTIONS ON AMERICAN COLUMN 538 AMERICAN TOBACCO V. UNITED STATES - 539
QUESTIONS ON AMERICAN TOBACCO--- 541 B. WHEN PARALLEL CONDUCT FOLLOWS
COMMON INVITATIONS OR SECRET MEETINGS 541 INTERSTATE CIRCUIT V. UNITED
STATES 541 QUESTIONS ON INTERSTATE CIRCUIT 545 C. WHEN PARALLEL CONDUCT
CAN BE EXPLAINED BY OLIGOPOLISTIC PRICE INTERDEPENDENCE--- 547 TABLE OF
CONTENTS 3. AGREEMENTS OR PRACTICES THAT FACILITATE OLIGOPOLISTIC PRICE
COORDINATION 548 MAPLE FLOORING MANUFACTURERS ASSN. V. UNITED STATES * -
- - - 549 QUESTIONS ON MAPLE FLOORING 554 UNITED STATES V. CONTAINER
CORP 555 QUESTIONS ON CONTAINER 559 UNITED STATES V. UNITED STATES
GYPSUM 561 QUESTIONS ON GYPSUM 564 FTC V. CEMENT INSTITUTE 565 QUESTIONS
ON CEMENT INSTITUTE---- 570 CHAPTER 7 MERGERS 571 CLAYTON ACT § 7, 15
U.S.C. § 18 572 A. HORIZONTAL MERGERS 575 1. UNILATERAL EFFECTS 577 U.S.
DOJ/FTC, HORIZONTAL MERGER GUIDELINES * 577 QUESTIONS ON THE U.S.
GUIDELINES ON UNILATERAL EFFECTS 583 FTC V. STAPLES, INC 583 QUESTIONS
ON STAPLES 590 NOTE ON U.S. AGENCY ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY 590 U.S.
DOJ/FTC, COMMENTARY ON THE HORIZONTAL MERGER GUIDE- LINES 591 QUESTIONS
ON U.S. MERGER COMMENTARY 602 2. OLIGOPOLISTIC EFFECTS & COLLECTIVE
DOMINANCE 602 U.S. DOJ/FTC, HORIZONTAL MERGER GUIDELINES 60 2 QUESTIONS
ON U.S. GUIDELINES ON COORDINATED EFFECTS 605 NOTE ON QUALITATIVE V.
EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENTS 606 FTC V. H.J. HEINZ CO 606 QUESTIONS ON FTC V.
HEINZ 611 U.S. DOJ/FTC, COMMENTARY ON THE HORIZONTAL MERGER GUIDE- LINES
613 QUESTIONS ON U.S. MERGER COMMENTARY ON COORDINATED EFFECTS 619 NOTE
ON PROVING THAT A MERGER WOULD WORSEN OLIGOPOLISTIC COORDINATION 620 3.
ENTRY BARRIERS * 620 U.S. DOJ/FTC, HORIZONTAL MERGER GUIDELINES 620
QUESTIONS ON ENTRY BARRIERS 624 FTCV. STAPLES, INC. 624 QUESTIONS ON
STAPLES 626 U.S. DOJ/FTC, COMMENTARY ON THE HORIZONTAL MERGER GUIDE-
LINES 626 QUESTIONS ON U.S. MERGER COMMENTARY ON ENTRY BARRIERS 633 4.
EFFICIENCIES & WEIGHING THE EQUITIES 634 U.S. DOJ/FTC, HORIZONTAL MERGER
GUIDELINES - 634 QUESTIONS ON U.S. GUIDELINES * 635 MERGER EFFICIENCIES
AND TOTAL V. CONSUMER WELFARE 636 NOTE AND QUESTIONS ON CONSUMER WELFARE
V. TOTAL WELFARE 637 CONSUMER TRUSTS AND OTHER COASIAN SOLUTIONS TO THE
TOTAL V. CONSUMER WELFARE DEBATE 638 FTC V. STAPLES, INC 639 NOTE AND
QUESTIONS ON STAPLES 642 FTC V. H.J. HEINZ CO * 642 QUESTIONS ON FTC V.
HEINZ *- 648 NOTE ON HOW TO BALANCE THE EQUITIES IN MERGER CASES-- 649
TABLE OF CONTENTS XI U.S. DOJ/FTC, COMMENTARY ON THE HORIZONTAL MERGER
GUIDE- LINES - - 649 QUESTIONS ON U.S. MERGER COMMENTARY ON EFFICIENCIES
656 5. THE FAILING FIRM DEFENSE 656 INTERNATIONAL SHOE V. FTC 656 NOTE
AND QUESTIONS ON INTERNATIONAL SHOE V. FTC 659 CITIZEN PUBLISHING V.
UNITED STATES 659 NOTE AND QUESTIONS ON CITIZEN S PUBLISHING - * 661
U.S. DOJ/FTC, HORIZONTAL MERGER GUIDELINES - 662 NOTE AND QUESTIONS ON
MERGER GUIDELINES ON THE FAILING FIRM DEFENSE 663 6. THE RELEVANCE OF
BUYER POWER, SOPHISTICATION, OR VIEWS 663 A. MERGERS BETWEEN BUYERS THAT
CREATE BUYER POWER 663 U.S. DOJ/FTC, HORIZONTAL MERGER GUIDELINES - 665
U.S. DOJ/FTC, COMMENTARY ON THE HORIZONTAL MERGER GUIDELINES 665 B.
SHOULD MERGERS BETWEEN SELLERS BE DEEMED CONSTRAINED BY BUYER POWER? 666
U.S. DOJ/FTC, COMMENTARY ON THE HORIZONTAL MERGER GUIDELINES 666
QUESTIONS ON WHETHER BUYER POWER SHOULD ALTER ASSESS- MENTS OF MERGERS
THAT OTHERWISE CREATE SELLER MARKET POWER-- --. 666 UNITED STATES V.
BAKER HUGHES, INC 666 NOTE AND QUESTIONS ON BAKER HUGHES 668 C. SHOULD
BUYER VIEWS ALTER ASSESSMENTS OF MERGERS BETWEEN SELLERS? - * 669 U.S.
DOJ/FTC, COMMENTARY ON THE HORIZONTAL MERGER GUIDELINES 669 NOTE ON
BUYER NONCOMPLAINTS 669 B. VERTICAL MERGERS *- 672 U.S. DOJ, 1984 MERGER
GUIDELINES - 674 NOTE AND QUESTIONS ON U.S. VERTICAL MERGER GUIDELINES
..- 677 IN THE MATTER OF CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC 678 QUESTIONS ON
CADENCE - * 685 C. CONGLOMERATE MERGERS 687 U.S. DOJ, 1984 MERGER
GUIDELINES * - * 689 NOTE AND QUESTIONS ON U.S. GUIDELINES ON MERGERS
AFFECTING POTENTIAL COMPETITION * 691 UNITED STATES V. MARINE
BANCORPORATION 693 NOTE AND QUESTIONS ON MARINE BANCORP * 699 INDEX 701
|
adam_txt |
UNITED STATES ANTITRUST LAW AND ECONOMICS BY ELNER ELHAUGE PETRIE
PROFESSOR OF LAW, HARVARD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION PRESS THOMSON
^ANNIVERSARY] "WEST TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CASES XIII CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION 1 A. THE FRAMEWORK OF LEGAL ISSUES RAISED BY BASIC
ANTITRUST ECO- NOMICS 1 B. AN OVERVIEW OF U.S. ANTITRUST LAWS AND
REMEDIAL STRUCTURE * 10 CHAPTER 2 WHICH HORIZONTAL AGREEMENTS ARE
ILLEGAL? 48 A. RELEVANT U.S. LAWS AND GENERAL LEGAL STANDARDS 48 SHERMAN
ACT § 1, 15 U.S.C. § 1 48 SHERMAN ACT § 2, 15 U.S.C. § 2 51 FEDERAL
TRADE COMMISSION ACT § 5, 15 U.S.C. § 45 52 B. HORIZONTAL PRICE-FIXING
52 UNITED STATES V. TRENTON POTTERIES--- 52 QUESTIONS ON TRENTON
POTTERIES 54 BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. (BMI) V. COLUMBIA BROADCASTING SYSTEM
55 QUESTIONS ON BMI 63 ARIZONA V. MARICOPA COUNTY MEDICAL SOC'Y 65
QUESTIONS ON MARICOPA 72 TEXACO INC. V. DAGHER - 74 QUESTIONS ON TEXACO
V. DAGHER 76 C. HORIZONTAL OUTPUT RESTRICTIONS 77 NCAA V. BOARD OF
REGENTS OF UNIV. OF OKLAHOMA 7 7 QUESTIONS ON NCAA 85 D. HORIZONTAL
MARKET DIVISIONS- 86 PALMER V. BRG 87 QUESTIONS ON PALMER V. BRG *- 88
U.S. DOJ/PTC, ANTITRUST GUIDELINES FOR COLLABORATIONS AMONG COMPETITORS
91 QUESTIONS ON FTC-DOJ GUIDELINES 93 E. HORIZONTAL AGREEMENTS NOT TO
DEAL WITH PARTICULAR FIRMS 94 1. BOYCOTTS BY UNRELATED RIVALS 95 KLOR'S
INC. V. BROADWAY-HALE STORES, INC 95 QUESTIONS ON KLOR'S 97 FASHION
ORIGINATORS' GUILD OF AM. U. FTC 97 QUESTIONS ON FASHION ORIGINATORS'
100 2. EXCLUSIONS OR EXPULSIONS FROM A PRODUCTIVE COLLABORATION OF
RIVALS 101 UNITED STATES V. TERMINAL RAILROAD ASS'N 101 ASSOCIATED PRESS
V. UNITED STATES 105 QUESTIONS ON TERMINAL RR AND ASSOCIATED PRESS 107
NORTHWEST WHOLESALE STATIONERS V. PACIFIC STATIONERY 109 QUESTIONS ON
NORTHWEST STATIONERS - 113 VI TABLE OF CONTENTS F. ARE SOCIAL WELFARE
JUSTIFICATIONS ADMISSIBLE? 114 NATIONAL SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEERS V. UNITED STATES 115 QUESTIONS ON PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS 120
FTC V. INDIANA FEDERATION OF DENTISTS 122 QUESTIONS ON INDIANA DENTISTS
126 FTC V. SUPERIOR COURT TRIAL LAWYERS ASS'N 12 7 QUESTIONS ON TRIAL
LAWYER'S ASS'N 131 CALIFORNIA DENTAL ASS'N V. FTC 132 QUESTIONS ON
CALIFORNIA DENTAL 140 NOTE ON BURDENS AND ORDERS OF THEORY AND PROOF
AFTER CALIFORNIA DENTAL 141 NOTE ON THE POLICY RELEVANCE OF NONPROFIT
STATUS 142 NOTE ON THE LEGAL TREATMENT OF NONPROFITS UNDER U.S.
ANTITRUST LAW - 143 UNITED STATES V. BROWN UNIVERSITY * 144 QUESTIONS ON
UNITED STATES V. BROWN 151 G. DOES INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW JUSTIFY AN
ANTICOMPETITIVE RE- STRAINT? 153 UNITED STATES V. GENERAL ELECTRIC - 155
QUESTIONS ON GENERAL ELECTRIC 156 UNITED STATES V. NEW WRINKLE, INC 158
QUESTIONS ON NEW WRINKLE 160 U.S. DOJ/FTC, ANTITRUST GUIDELINES FOR THE
LICENSING OF INTELLEC- TUAL PROPERTY (1995) ----- 161 QUESTIONS ON THE
U.S. GUIDELINES 169 H. BUYER CARTELS --- 169 MANDEVILLE ISLAND FARMS V.
AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR 169 QUESTIONS ON MANDEVILLE-- 173 NOTE ON
COUNTERVAILING POWER AND THE PROBLEM OF THE SECOND BEST *- 174 CHAPTER 3
WHAT UNILATERAL CONDUCT IS ILLEGAL? - 178 A. RELEVANT LAWS & BASIC LEGAL
ELEMENTS * 178 SHERMAN ACT § 2, 15 U.S.C. § 2 - 178 FEDERAL TRADE
COMMISSION ACT § 5, 15 U.S.C. § 45 179 ROBINSON-PATMAN ACT, 15 U.S.C. §
13(A) 180 B. THE POWER ELEMENT * 183 1. ECONOMIC AND LEGAL TESTS OF
MARKET POWER GENERALLY 184 2. LEGAL TESTS OF MONOPOLY POWER OR A
DOMINANT POSITION 191 3. MARKET DEFINITION 192 UNITED STATES V. DU PONT
& CO. (THE CELLOPHANE CASE) 193 QUESTIONS ON DU PONT (THE CELLOPHANE
CASE) - 199 U.S. DOJ/FTC, HORIZONTAL MERGER GUIDELINES - 202 NOTES AND
QUESTIONS ON THE U.S. MARKET DEFINITION GUIDELINES 207 NOTE ON TECHNICAL
METHODS USED IN MARKET DEFINITION 212 4. AFTERMARKETS - 216 EASTMAN
KODAK V. IMAGE TECHNICAL SERVS * 216 QUESTIONS ON KODAK 224 C. SECOND
ELEMENT: ANTICOMPETITIVE CONDUCT 225 1. GENERAL STANDARDS 225 2.
PREDATORY PRICING 228 A. BELOW-COST PREDATORY PRICING 228 BROOKE GROUP
LTD. (LIGGETT) V. BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBAC- CO CORP 228 TABLE OF
CONTENTS VIL NOTE AND QUESTIONS ABOUT BROOKE--- 237 NOTE ON U.S.
CONFLICT ON THE PROPER COST MEASURE -. 240 ELHAUGE, WHY ABOVE-COST PRICE
CUTS TO DRIVE OUT ENTRANTS DO NOT SIGNAL PREDATION OR EVEN MARKET POWER
* AND THE IMPLICATIONS FOR DEFINING COSTS 241 B. ABOVE-COST PREDATORY
PRICING - 243 ENFORCEMENT POLICY REGARDING UNFAIR EXCLUSIONARY CONDUCT
IN THE AIR TRANSPORTATION INDUSTRY -. -. 244 NOTE AND QUESTIONS ON
THE PROPOSED U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENFORCED POLICY -~- ~-
246 UNITED STATES V. AMR CORP * 247 QUESTIONS ON AMERICAN AIRLINES - 250
NOTE ON PRICE DISCRIMINATION - ~~ 251 3. EXCLUSIONS FROM OWNED
PROPERTY-UNILATERAL REFUSALS TO DEAL. 253 OTTER TAIL POWER COMPANY V.
UNITED STATES- - 254 QUESTIONS ON OTTER TAIL -* - 259 ASPEN SKIING CO.
V. ASPEN HIGHLANDS SKIING CORP. 263 QUESTIONS ON ASPEN SKIING ~~ 270
EASTMAN KODAK V. IMAGE TECHNICAL SERVS. 273 QUESTIONS ON THE KODAK DUTY
TO DEAL WITH RIVALS - 2 75 VERIZON COMMUN. V. LAW OFFICES OF CURTIS V.
TRINKO *. 276 QUESTIONS ON VERIZON V. TRINKO - 282 EINER ELHAUGE,
DEFINING BETTER MONOPOLIZATION STANDARDS 283 NOTE ON THE U.S. ESSENTIAL
FACILITIES DOCTRINE 284 NOTE ON APPLICATION OF U.S. ANTITRUST DUTIES TO
DEAL TO INTEL- LECTUAL PROPERTY - 286 4. PRICE SQUEEZES AND PREDATORY
OVERPAYING *. 287 TOWN OF CONCORD V. BOSTON EDISON CO 288 QUESTIONS ON
TOWN OF CONCORD 296 WEYERHAEUSER CO. V. ROSS-SIMMONS HARDWOOD LUMBER 297
NOTE AND QUESTIONS ON WEYERHAEUSER 301 D. CAUSAL CONNECTION BETWEEN
FIRST AND SECOND ELEMENTS REQUIRED? 302 EINER ELHAUGE, DEFINING BETTER
MONOPOLIZATION STANDARDS 302 NOTE ON MONOPOLY LEVERAGING -- 303 E.
ATTEMPTED MONOPOLIZATION *. 304 LORAIN JOURNAL V. UNITED STATES 30 4
QUESTIONS ON LORAIN JOURNAL 306 UNITED STATES V. AMERICAN AIRLINES 306
QUESTIONS ON AMERICAN AIRLINES ATTEMPTED CARTEL CASE 309 SPECTRUM SPORTS
V. MCQUILLAN 309 NOTE AND QUESTIONS ON SPECTRUM SPORTS 312 CHAPTER 4
VERTICAL AGREEMENTS THAT RESTRICT DEALING WITH RIVALS - - - - 314 A.
INTRODUCTION * - 314 CLAYTON ACT § 3, 15 U.S.C. § 14- - - - 315 B.
EXCLUSIVE DEALING - ----- * 316 UNITED STATES V. GRIFFITH * - - 321 NOTE
ON GRIFFITH AND LORAIN JOURNAL 324 STANDARD FASHION V. MAGRANE-HOUSTON -
- - 325 QUESTIONS ON STANDARD FASHION - 326 STANDARD OIL AND STANDARD
STATIONS V. UNITED STATES 326 QUESTIONS ON STANDARD STATIONS - - - ---
331 VIII TABLE OF CONTENTS FTC V. MOTION PICTURE ADVERTISING SERVICE 333
NOTE ON CUMULATIVE FORECLOSURE 335 TAMPA ELECTRIC V. NASHVILLE COAL 337
NOTE AND QUESTIONS ON TAMPA ELECTRIC 341 UNITED STATES V. MICROSOFT 342
NOTE ON THE U.S. LOWER COURT SPLITS ON FORECLOSURE THRESHOLDS AND
TERMINABILITY RELEVANCE 348 QUESTIONS ON MICROSOFT'S EXCLUSIVE DEALING
HOLDINGS 349 C. TYING 350 UNITED SHOE MACHINERY V. UNITED STATES 36 1
QUESTIONS ON UNITED SHOE TYING CASE 363 INTERNATIONAL SALT V. UNITED
STATES 363 QUESTIONS ON INTERNATIONAL SALT 365 TIMES-PICAYUNE PUBLISHING
V. UNITED STATES 366 QUESTIONS ON TIMES-PICAYUNE 371 JEFFERSON PARISH
HOSPITAL V. HYDE 373 QUESTIONS ON JEFFERSON PARISH 383 EASTMAN KODAK V.
IMAGE TECHNICAL SERVS 386 QUESTIONS ON KODAK 392 ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS
INC. V. INDEPENDENT INK, INC 393 QUESTIONS ON ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS 397
UNITED STATES V. MICROSOFT 398 QUESTIONS ON U.S. MICROSOFT CASE HOLDINGS
ON TYING 405 D. LOYALTY AND BUNDLED DISCOUNTS 406 UNITED STATES V.
LOEW'S INC 416 QUESTIONS ON LOEW'S 418 FTC V. BROWN SHOE * 419 QUESTIONS
ON FTC V. BROWN SHOE 421 CONCORD BOAT V. BRUNSWICK CORP. 421 QUESTIONS
ON CONCORD BOAT 424 LEPAGE'S INC. V. 3M 425 QUESTIONS ON LEPAGE'S 431
CASCADE HEALTH SOLUTIONS V. PEACEHEALTH 432 QUESTIONS ON CASCADE HEALTH
438 NOTE ON THE U.S. LOWER COURT SPLITS ON LOYALTY AND BUNDLED DISCOUNTS
439 CHAPTER 5 AGREEMENTS AND CONDUCT THAT ARGUABLY DIS- TORT DOWNSTREAM
COMPETITION IN DISTRIBUTING A SUPPLI- ER'S PRODUCTS 44 1 A. INTRODUCTION
441 B. INTRABRAND DISTRIBUTIONAL RESTRAINTS ON RESALE 444 1. VERTICAL
NONPRICE RESTRAINTS ON DISTRIBUTION 445 CONTINENTAL T.V. V. GTE SYLVANIA
446 QUESTIONS ON SYLVANIA 452 2. VERTICAL MAXIMUM PRICE-FIXING 453 STATE
OIL CO. V. KHAN 455 QUESTIONS ON STATE OIL V. KHAN 460 3. VERTICAL
AGREEMENTS FIXING MINIMUM RESALE PRICES 460 LEEGIN CREATIVE LEATHER
PRODUCTS V. PSKS, INC. -. 460 NOTES AND QUESTIONS ON LEEGIN 479 TABLE
OF CONTENTS IX 4. HOW TO CHARACTERIZE AGREEMENTS 482 A. ARE DUAL
DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENTS VERTICAL OR HORIZONTAL? - 482 B. VERTICAL
AGREEMENTS TO "BOYCOTT" THE RIVAL OF A DEALER WITHOUT ANY PROCOMPETITIVE
JUSTIFICATION 484 NYNEXV. DISCON *. 484 QUESTIONS ON NYNEX V. DISCON 487
C. PRICE DISCRIMINATION THAT ARGUABLY DISTORTS DOWNSTREAM COMPE- TITION
487 ROBINSON-PATMAN ACT § 2, 15 U.S.C. § 13 488 FTC V. MORTON SALT CO
489 QUESTIONS ON MORTON SALT 493 TEXACO V. HASBROUCK 494 QUESTIONS ON
TEXACO V. HASBROUCK 499 VOLVO TRUCKS N.A. V. REEDER-SIMCO GMC 500
QUESTIONS ON VOLVO 504 NOTE ON OTHER ROBINSON-PATMAN ACT PROVISIONS *
506 CHAPTER 6 PROVING AN AGREEMENT OR CONCERTED ACTION 50 7 A. ARE THE
DEFENDANTS SEPARATE ENTITIES? 507 COPPERWELD CORP. V. INDEPENDENCE TUBE
CORP 507 QUESTIONS ON COPPERWELD * 511 NOTE ON AGENCY RELATIONS 513 B.
STANDARDS FOR FINDING A VERTICAL AGREEMENT * 514 MONSANTO CO. V.
SPRAY-RITE SERVICE CORP 515 QUESTIONS ON MONSANTO *- 518 C. STANDARDS
FOR FINDING A HORIZONTAL AGREEMENT OR CONCERTED AC- TION* *- 520 1.
PARALLEL CONDUCT EQUALLY CONSISTENT WITH AN INDEPENDENT MOTIVE* -* 521
THEATRE ENTERPRISES V. PARAMOUNT FILM DISTRIBUTING 521 QUESTIONS ON
THEATRE ENTERPRISES *- 523 MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC V. ZENITH RADIO 523
QUESTIONS ON MATSUSHITA 528 CEMENT MANUFACTURERS PROTECTIVE ASS'N V. U.S
529 QUESTIONS ON CEMENT MANUFACTURERS 531 2. PARALLEL CONDUCT THAT WOULD
BE UNPROFITABLE IF NOT ENGAGED IN BY OTHER FIRMS 531 A. WHEN PARALLEL
CONDUCT IS IMPLAUSIBLE WITHOUT AN EXPLICIT AGREEMENT * 531 EASTERN
STATES RETAIL LUMBER DEALERS' ASS 'N V. U.S 531 QUESTIONS ON EASTERN
STATES LUMBER 533 AMERICAN COLUMN & LUMBER V. UNITED STATES 533
QUESTIONS ON AMERICAN COLUMN 538 AMERICAN TOBACCO V. UNITED STATES - 539
QUESTIONS ON AMERICAN TOBACCO--- 541 B. WHEN PARALLEL CONDUCT FOLLOWS
COMMON INVITATIONS OR SECRET MEETINGS 541 INTERSTATE CIRCUIT V. UNITED
STATES 541 QUESTIONS ON INTERSTATE CIRCUIT 545 C. WHEN PARALLEL CONDUCT
CAN BE EXPLAINED BY OLIGOPOLISTIC PRICE INTERDEPENDENCE--- 547 TABLE OF
CONTENTS 3. AGREEMENTS OR PRACTICES THAT FACILITATE OLIGOPOLISTIC PRICE
COORDINATION 548 MAPLE FLOORING MANUFACTURERS ASSN. V. UNITED STATES * -
- - - 549 QUESTIONS ON MAPLE FLOORING 554 UNITED STATES V. CONTAINER
CORP 555 QUESTIONS ON CONTAINER 559 UNITED STATES V. UNITED STATES
GYPSUM 561 QUESTIONS ON GYPSUM 564 FTC V. CEMENT INSTITUTE 565 QUESTIONS
ON CEMENT INSTITUTE---- 570 CHAPTER 7 MERGERS 571 CLAYTON ACT § 7, 15
U.S.C. § 18 572 A. HORIZONTAL MERGERS 575 1. UNILATERAL EFFECTS 577 U.S.
DOJ/FTC, HORIZONTAL MERGER GUIDELINES * 577 QUESTIONS ON THE U.S.
GUIDELINES ON UNILATERAL EFFECTS 583 FTC V. STAPLES, INC 583 QUESTIONS
ON STAPLES 590 NOTE ON U.S. AGENCY ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY 590 U.S.
DOJ/FTC, COMMENTARY ON THE HORIZONTAL MERGER GUIDE- LINES 591 QUESTIONS
ON U.S. MERGER COMMENTARY 602 2. OLIGOPOLISTIC EFFECTS & COLLECTIVE
DOMINANCE 602 U.S. DOJ/FTC, HORIZONTAL MERGER GUIDELINES 60 2 QUESTIONS
ON U.S. GUIDELINES ON COORDINATED EFFECTS 605 NOTE ON QUALITATIVE V.
EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENTS 606 FTC V. H.J. HEINZ CO 606 QUESTIONS ON FTC V.
HEINZ 611 U.S. DOJ/FTC, COMMENTARY ON THE HORIZONTAL MERGER GUIDE- LINES
613 QUESTIONS ON U.S. MERGER COMMENTARY ON COORDINATED EFFECTS 619 NOTE
ON PROVING THAT A MERGER WOULD WORSEN OLIGOPOLISTIC COORDINATION 620 3.
ENTRY BARRIERS * 620 U.S. DOJ/FTC, HORIZONTAL MERGER GUIDELINES 620
QUESTIONS ON ENTRY BARRIERS 624 FTCV. STAPLES, INC. 624 QUESTIONS ON
STAPLES 626 U.S. DOJ/FTC, COMMENTARY ON THE HORIZONTAL MERGER GUIDE-
LINES 626 QUESTIONS ON U.S. MERGER COMMENTARY ON ENTRY BARRIERS 633 4.
EFFICIENCIES & WEIGHING THE EQUITIES 634 U.S. DOJ/FTC, HORIZONTAL MERGER
GUIDELINES - 634 QUESTIONS ON U.S. GUIDELINES * 635 MERGER EFFICIENCIES
AND TOTAL V. CONSUMER WELFARE 636 NOTE AND QUESTIONS ON CONSUMER WELFARE
V. TOTAL WELFARE 637 CONSUMER TRUSTS AND OTHER COASIAN SOLUTIONS TO THE
TOTAL V. CONSUMER WELFARE DEBATE 638 FTC V. STAPLES, INC 639 NOTE AND
QUESTIONS ON STAPLES 642 FTC V. H.J. HEINZ CO * 642 QUESTIONS ON FTC V.
HEINZ *- 648 NOTE ON HOW TO BALANCE THE EQUITIES IN MERGER CASES-- 649
TABLE OF CONTENTS XI U.S. DOJ/FTC, COMMENTARY ON THE HORIZONTAL MERGER
GUIDE- LINES - - 649 QUESTIONS ON U.S. MERGER COMMENTARY ON EFFICIENCIES
656 5. THE FAILING FIRM DEFENSE 656 INTERNATIONAL SHOE V. FTC 656 NOTE
AND QUESTIONS ON INTERNATIONAL SHOE V. FTC 659 CITIZEN PUBLISHING V.
UNITED STATES 659 NOTE AND QUESTIONS ON CITIZEN'S PUBLISHING - * 661
U.S. DOJ/FTC, HORIZONTAL MERGER GUIDELINES - 662 NOTE AND QUESTIONS ON
MERGER GUIDELINES ON THE FAILING FIRM DEFENSE 663 6. THE RELEVANCE OF
BUYER POWER, SOPHISTICATION, OR VIEWS 663 A. MERGERS BETWEEN BUYERS THAT
CREATE BUYER POWER 663 U.S. DOJ/FTC, HORIZONTAL MERGER GUIDELINES - 665
U.S. DOJ/FTC, COMMENTARY ON THE HORIZONTAL MERGER GUIDELINES 665 B.
SHOULD MERGERS BETWEEN SELLERS BE DEEMED CONSTRAINED BY BUYER POWER? 666
U.S. DOJ/FTC, COMMENTARY ON THE HORIZONTAL MERGER GUIDELINES 666
QUESTIONS ON WHETHER BUYER POWER SHOULD ALTER ASSESS- MENTS OF MERGERS
THAT OTHERWISE CREATE SELLER MARKET POWER-- --. 666 UNITED STATES V.
BAKER HUGHES, INC 666 NOTE AND QUESTIONS ON BAKER HUGHES 668 C. SHOULD
BUYER VIEWS ALTER ASSESSMENTS OF MERGERS BETWEEN SELLERS? - * 669 U.S.
DOJ/FTC, COMMENTARY ON THE HORIZONTAL MERGER GUIDELINES 669 NOTE ON
BUYER NONCOMPLAINTS 669 B. VERTICAL MERGERS *- 672 U.S. DOJ, 1984 MERGER
GUIDELINES - 674 NOTE AND QUESTIONS ON U.S. VERTICAL MERGER GUIDELINES
.- 677 IN THE MATTER OF CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC 678 QUESTIONS ON
CADENCE - * 685 C. CONGLOMERATE MERGERS 687 U.S. DOJ, 1984 MERGER
GUIDELINES * - * 689 NOTE AND QUESTIONS ON U.S. GUIDELINES ON MERGERS
AFFECTING POTENTIAL COMPETITION * 691 UNITED STATES V. MARINE
BANCORPORATION 693 NOTE AND QUESTIONS ON MARINE BANCORP * 699 INDEX 701 |
any_adam_object | 1 |
any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
author | Elhauge, Einer |
author_facet | Elhauge, Einer |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Elhauge, Einer |
author_variant | e e ee |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV035067204 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)231588188 (DE-599)BVBBV035067204 |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01124nam a2200313 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV035067204</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20090204 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">080924s2008 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781599414959</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-59941-495-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1599414953</subfield><subfield code="9">1-59941-495-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)231588188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV035067204</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Elhauge, Einer</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">United States antitrust law and economics</subfield><subfield code="c">by Einer Elhauge</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">New York</subfield><subfield code="b">Foundation Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XXI, 708 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">University casebook series</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Antitrust law / Economic aspects / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">GBV Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016735630&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016735630</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | USA |
geographic_facet | USA |
id | DE-604.BV035067204 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-02T22:02:45Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T21:21:27Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9781599414959 1599414953 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016735630 |
oclc_num | 231588188 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-M382 |
owner_facet | DE-M382 |
physical | XXI, 708 S. |
publishDate | 2008 |
publishDateSearch | 2008 |
publishDateSort | 2008 |
publisher | Foundation Press |
record_format | marc |
series2 | University casebook series |
spelling | Elhauge, Einer Verfasser aut United States antitrust law and economics by Einer Elhauge New York Foundation Press 2008 XXI, 708 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier University casebook series Antitrust law / Economic aspects / United States USA GBV Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016735630&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
spellingShingle | Elhauge, Einer United States antitrust law and economics Antitrust law / Economic aspects / United States |
title | United States antitrust law and economics |
title_auth | United States antitrust law and economics |
title_exact_search | United States antitrust law and economics |
title_exact_search_txtP | United States antitrust law and economics |
title_full | United States antitrust law and economics by Einer Elhauge |
title_fullStr | United States antitrust law and economics by Einer Elhauge |
title_full_unstemmed | United States antitrust law and economics by Einer Elhauge |
title_short | United States antitrust law and economics |
title_sort | united states antitrust law and economics |
topic | Antitrust law / Economic aspects / United States |
topic_facet | Antitrust law / Economic aspects / United States USA |
url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016735630&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elhaugeeiner unitedstatesantitrustlawandeconomics |