N. V. Gogolʹ i narodnaja kulʹtura: Sedʹmye Gogolevskie Čtenija ; materialy dokladov i soobščenij Meždunarodnoj Naučnoj Konferencii Moskva, 30 marta - 4 aprelja 2007 goda
Gespeichert in:
| Weitere Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Tagungsbericht Buch |
| Sprache: | Russian |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Moskva
ČeRo
2008
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | 409 S. zahlr. Ill. |
| ISBN: | 9785887113098 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV025562655 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20170804 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 100417s2008 a||| |||| 10||| rus d | ||
| 020 | |a 9785887113098 |9 978-5-88711-309-8 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)315759983 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV025562655 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a rus | |
| 049 | |a DE-11 |a DE-12 |a DE-739 | ||
| 084 | |a KI 3790 |0 (DE-625)77017: |2 rvk | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a N. V. Gogolʹ i narodnaja kulʹtura |b Sedʹmye Gogolevskie Čtenija ; materialy dokladov i soobščenij Meždunarodnoj Naučnoj Konferencii Moskva, 30 marta - 4 aprelja 2007 goda |c pod obščej red. V. P. Vikulovoj |
| 264 | 1 | |a Moskva |b ČeRo |c 2008 | |
| 300 | |a 409 S. |b zahlr. Ill. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 600 | 1 | 7 | |a Gogolʹ, Nikolaj Vasilʹevič |d 1809-1852 |0 (DE-588)118540424 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Volkskultur |0 (DE-588)4063849-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)1071861417 |a Konferenzschrift |y 2007 |z Moskau |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Gogolʹ, Nikolaj Vasilʹevič |d 1809-1852 |0 (DE-588)118540424 |D p |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Volkskultur |0 (DE-588)4063849-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Vikulova, Vera Pavlovna |d 1956- |0 (DE-588)102478469X |4 edt | |
| 711 | 2 | |a Gogolevskie Čtenija |n 7 |d 2007 |c Moskau |j Sonstige |0 (DE-588)10350783-8 |4 oth | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Passau - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=020161881&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-020161881 | ||
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 390 |e 22/bsb |f 09034 |g 471 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 809 |e 22/bsb |f 09034 |g 471 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804142738715705344 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | Содффанш
Summary. Аннотированное содержание на английском языке.........6
В. П. Викулова...............................................16
A. И. Шкурко.................................................18
Б. Н. Тарасов................................................20
М. Д. Афанасьев................................................21
Л. Д. Емко...................................................23
B. Д. Мищенко................................................25
Истоки и источники народности в творчестве Гоголя
Ю. Я. Барабаш. Уроки этнографии. Возвращаясь к давним спорам...29
В. Я. Звиняцковский. В чем же наконец существо «украинства»
Гоголя и в чем его особенность........................ 43
8. А. Воропаев. Гоголевская «Повесть о капитане Копейкине»:
фольклорные источники и смысл......................... 51
И. А. Виноградов. Обретение жанра: Народная песня
и «Тарас Бульба» Гоголя.................................62
Ю. Б. Орлицкий. Элементы народного стиха в прозе Гоголя
(коломыйковый ритм, рифма и т. д.). ............... .81
Дж. Страно. Трансформация народных и литературных
моделей в гоголевской прозе 30-х гг. (Гоголь и лубок). ..91
М. С. Гладилин. Народные картинки в произведениях Н. В. Гоголя.99
В. И. Мильдон. Заклинание и молитва. Об одном из архаических
источников поэтики Гоголя............................. 109
Л. М. Ельницкая. О мифологическом подтексте и архаических
элементах сюжета «Мертвых душ»........................ 115
Л. А. Сапченко. Литературная и фольклорно-мифологическая
традиции в «Вечерах на хуторе близ Диканьки» как
циклообразующие факторы.............................. 123
А. И. Иваницкий. Еще об одном возможном источнике гоголевской
«психо-логики» эроса («Вий» и баллада
К. Брентано «В чаще тайной, заповедной...»)................ 132
И. Н. Сокольский, О. А. Деханова. Фитонимы в творчестве
Н. В. Гоголя (настойка на деревий и грибы с нечуй-витер)... 140
П. В. Николаева. Следы архаической традиции в творчестве
Н. В. Гоголя: О магическом потенциале слова................ 1 46
Е. В. Изотова. Пословицы в петербургских повестях Н. В. Гоголя. 154
Поэтика Гоголя и народная культура
Е. И. Анненкова. Телесное и духовное в традиционной народной
культуре и в прозе И. В. Гоголя (Семантика и функции еды). 163
В. Ш. Кривонос. Гоголь и городской фольклор................... 175
A. X. Гольденберг. Смена архетипов: к проблеме эволюции
фольклорных традиций в поэтике Гоголя..................... 185
Е. Г. Падерина Гоголевский карточный сюжет и традиции
народного театра.......................................... 196
Кп. Оливиери. Использование фольклора в творчестве
О. М. Сомова и Н. В. Гоголя...............................209
И. О. Осипова. Мифологема пути в художественном пространстве
петербургских повестей Гоголя.............................220
О. Н. Николенко. Мотив чертовщины в петербургских
повестях И. Гоголя («Невский проспект»)...................228
К. Д. Гордович. Смешное и страшное в произведениях фольклора
и в повестях Гоголя..................................... 238
Н. И. Ищук-Фадеева. Мир Гоголя как «заколдованное место»......244
B. В. Высоцкая. Слухи, толки и сплетни в контексте произведений
Гоголя....................................................252
C. Н. Патапенко. «Какие со мной чудеса...» (Иван Хлестаков
как модификация образа сказочного персонажа)......... . . , . 261
Е. А. Шрага. Быличка и светский разговор как структурная основа
прозаической циклизации: «Вечера на хуторе близ Диканьки»
в контексте традиции........................................ 267
Седьмые ¿гоголевские чтения
м. В. Прасковьина. Образ границы в «Вечерах на хуторе
близ Диканьки» Н. В. Гоголя...............................275
Т в Шарбенко. Трансформация концепта «ярмарка» в «столичных»
повестях Н. Гоголя и М. Булгакова («Невский проспект»
и «Собачье сердце»).......................................281
Контекст: религия, историософия, искусство, личность
П. В. Михед. Н. В. Гоголь и Великая польская эмиграция
(проблемы изучения).......................................293
Ю. В. Балакшина. Пометы Н. В. Гоголя в Книге Бытия: материалы
и интерпретация...........................................302
Е. Е. Дмитриева. Религия от искусства, или Вопрос о конфессиях
в художественном мире Гоголя . . . ,......................313
Р. Джулиани. Историософские взгляды Гоголя и Шевырева.
О «народе сильном, непочатом».............................326
А В. Дубровский. Н. В. Гоголь и «мнимый Пушкин» (К вопросу
об авторстве стихотворения «Первая ночь»).................336
до
С. В. Овечкин. Откуда у Гоголя взялся черт и что с ним потом стало . . . 346 о
В. А. Скавыш. Психопатология у Гоголя или «мертвые души»
психиатров?...............................................355
Народное прочтение и прочтение народного у Гоголя
A. А. Курицкая, Л. А. Сугай. Гоголь и проблема народного
просвещения на рубеже Х1Х-ХХ вв...........................367
B. Ю. Белоногова. К вопросу об апокрифических рассказах о Гоголе. . 377
Ю. В. Розанов. Вий на работе и на покое: образ «страшного
истребителя» у Гоголя и Ремизова..........................382
C. А. Кибальник. Гоголь в экзистенциальной интерпретации
Газданова.................................................389
401
Об авторах
dtuHomufroSamm codepojcaHue m anuiM tckoM fiMike
Roots and Sources of Folk Tradition in Gogol s Works
Yu. Ya. Barabash....................................................29
Ethnography Lessons (Recurring to Bygone Disputes)
Up-to-date interpretation of «ethnographic critics» discourse of Ukrainian novels by
Nikolai Gogol (particularly, discussions of 50-60s XIX century between P. Kulish and
M. Maksimovitch) brings to life some problems of Gogol studies, as well as wider
problems of literature studying and aesthetics.
V. Ya. Zvinyatzkovskiy............................................. 43
What is after all the Essence and Peculiarity of Gogol s «Ukrainianness»
The «Ukrainianness» of Gogol was authorised by Taras Shevchenko. His poem «To
Gogol» (December, 1 844) must be read in the context of the discussion in Rostopchina s
salon. According to Shevchenko, Gogol s laughter and his «Ukrainianness» are the
same. Gogol by himself had identified his task in the world of laughter as «to present
the Devil as a fool» — and this task, for Gogol, is a special Ukrainian one.
V. A. Voropaev......................................................51
«The Tale of Captain Kopeikin» by N. Gogol Folklore Sources and their
Meaning
The article focuses on the folk elements of «The Tale of Captain Kopeikin». The form
of the narration in the story combines folksy-poetic sources with real-event, specific
historical features. Folk rumors of captain Kopeikin originating from the folk poetry is
not less important for the aesthetic comprehension of the story than the chronologi-
cal matching of the character to a certain time period — the campaign of 1812. The
main idea of the story is represented in the proverb «The Russian peasant is wise after
the event». Gogol s reflection on the destiny of Russian folk, its present and historical
future, «the afterwit or the mind of the final conclusions which is predominantly the
feature of Russian character», is the core of the Russian nature that defines Russians
from other nations. With this very feature of the nation which is close to the wit of
the folk proverbs Gogol associated with the high destination of Russia.
I. A. Vinogradov....................................................62
Discovery of a Genre Folk Song and «Taras Bulba» by Gogol
The author traces the forming of the historical prose genre of Gogol. What influ-
ence had aural folk culture — Ukrainian folk meditation songs, on the creator of
a
едьмые
голевские чтения
«Taras Bulba» is being examined in the article. The author also points out the way
N Karamzin s creative method and its comprehension by N. Gogol influenced the
genre evolution of the writer.
Yu B. Orlitskiy.........................................................81
Folk Poem Features in Gogol s Prose (kolomylkovy rhythm and rhyme)
This article explores the assumptions stated by researchers of Gogol s style. The re-
searchers claim that Gogol s prose possess a reflection of the elements of folk verse
culture: so-called kolomyikovy rhythm and rhyme. Selective calculations show that
these elements can be found especially in the early stories of the writer, which are
more connected with folklore.
J. Strano.............................................*.................y 1
The Transformation of Literature and Folk Patterns in Gogol s Prose of the
1930s (Gogol and the Lubok)
Folk culture, in all of its expressions — oral, theatrical, figurative — strongly influenced Gogol s
work. The writer used this culture in various contexts, with varying functions and aims: in
creating stylistic and compositional artifices, in opposition to the models of «high» literature,
in representing characters and the development of the plot. In «The Fair at Sorochintzi» for
example, the image of the «river-beautiful maid» (reka krasavitza), typical of the popular
song, is contrasted with the description of Psel himself, composed in rhythmic prose and
sprinkled with poetical terms. In «Evenings on a Farm Near Dikanka» some types a re mutated
from the vertep, from the lubok derives the depiction of the infernal monsters. In «The Tale
of How Ivan Ivanovich Quarelled with Ivan Nikiforovich» the two heroes form an opposi-
tional but at the same time mirrored couple, like the characters in the seventeenth-century
lubok, «Foma and Yeryoma»,« Prokhor and Boris», and the very absurdity of their behaviour
is «typical lubok». In «The Nose» the parody of literary fantasy and its mixture with elements
taken from daily life and from the lubok create a unique and complex text.
M. S. Gladilin..........................................................99
The Folk Pictures in Gogol s Works
The author considers the role of the folk pictures in Gogol s works: «The Oldworld
Landowners», «The Portrait» and Gogol s poem «Dead Souls».
Special attention is dedicated to the image of the «bird» in Gogol s poem «Dead Souls».
V. I. Mildon............................................................109
Incantation and Prayer. On one of the Archaic Sources of Gogol s
Poetics
The author believes that faith has the power to rule the world through the use of
words. For instance, incantation can appeal to forces of evil and prayer can appeal
to forces of good, in Gogol s artistic work, incantation prevailed. That is why in the
second and third volumes of the «Dead Souls», Gogol had failed to paint Chichikov
as a righteous man, although he had hoped to change the whole of Russia by means
of a saint hero.
L. M. Elnitskaya.....................................................115
On Mythological Implications and Archaic Elements of the «Dead Souls»
Plot
In his book the «Dead Souls» N. V. Gogol uses vagrant plots of the world s literature,
in particular the ones which contain the selling of one s soul to the devil. The picture
of the world portrayed in the book reflects medieval folk beliefs according to which
the possession of earthly blessings depends on the devil and a high price (the soul)
has to be paid for them. The archaic character of the plot manifests itself through
the mutual transitions of dead matter into living matter, of real everyday things into
mythological ones. The collision of Gogol s keen religious pathos with clear compre-
hension of stagnant immobility of life gives birth to laughter, which is «the only posi-
tive hero» of this author s works.
L. A. Sapchenko.......................................................123
Literary and Folklore-Mythological Traditions in Gogol s «Evenings on a
Farm Near Dikanka» as Cycle-Forming Factors
«Evening» in Gogol s cycle represents: a) a method of compositional division; b) a
time of the day that separates day and night; c) a borderline area between the real and
the fantastic, the good and the evil, finite and infinite. Poetics of the cycle is defined
in large part by the through images of a door and a window (a window that opens in
the evening in particular). All these meanings are linked together by the semantics of
a border and shed light on the most significant characteristics of Gogol s perspective
on the world. In «Evenings on a Farm Near Dikanka» the consecutively joined parts
that are traditionally linked together in a form of an oral narration are also penetrated
with deep ties that are rooted in the folk mythology.
A. I. Ivanitskiy......................................................132
One more Romantic Source of Gogol s «Psycho-Logic» of Eros (and
C. Bretano s ballade «In the dark secret thicket...»)
The possible romantic origin of «Viy» — Clement Brentano s ballade «In the dark se-
cret thicket» (181 1) — is under the consideration in this article. Their plots correlate
as inverted images. Khoma Brut becomes the object of the witch s love attack. With
the help of prayers and incantations he manages to overcome her power but just for
his male triumph over her. As a result he discloses a beauty in the old woman, comes
under her spell and kills her influences by his passion. Then he repents and serves
a triple funeral service that becomes a fatal for him. The hero of Brentano, a young
«swain», follows the reverse way: he makes up «the holy virgin» and turns her with
L/едьмые ¿гоголевские чтения
the help of his impassioned imagination first into a silvan fairy, then into a witch. If
Brentano makes spiritual and material, connected with soil worship of a woman to
contradict each other, this ever-being soil basis in «Viy» becomes for the hero the
subject of some unconscious inspiring cult, mixed with desire and fear.
I. N. Sokolsky, o. A. Dekhanova.....................................140
phytonimes in N. Gogol s Works
The article comment on the meanings of some phytonimes, mentioned in the novel
«The Old World Landowners».
P. V. Nikolaeva.....................................................146
Traces of Archaic Tradition in Gogol s Work: The Magic Potential of the
Word
This article is focused on one of the aspects of the problem regarding «Gogol and the
word», namely, the unconventional reception of words by the writer and his heroes.
Analysis of the theme of the magic word is based on the works of «Evenings on a
Farm near Dikan ka» and «Viy».
E. V. Izotova............................................................154
Proverbs in Petersburg Tales by N. V. Gogol
«Multilingual mixtures» in Gogol s texts are used not only as a form, but as a tech-
nique. Just so in his works, which at first sight are reduced folklore elements, folk po-
etry motives are developing. First of all this are motives, entered by the proverbs and
by-words. Essentially French sayings se refaire le nezar d vouloir manger le nez de qn
organize the plot of «Nose» and «Diary of a Madman», In the Petersburg tales proverbs
about noses set theme of Russian cheap popular prints, one of the main characters of
which in the first half of the XIXth century was Napoleon. The motive of expatriated
and punished ruler gets in «Diary of a Madman» complementary widening.
( loqol Poetics and Folk Culture
E. I. Annenkova....................................................163
Corporeal and Spiritual in Folk Culture Tradition and Gogol s Prose
The article focuses on semantic and functional images of food in different works
of Gogol. Comparison of Gogol s texts to folk tradition within the Christian culture
highlights the new emphasis to the problem of corporeal and spiritual that Russian
literature brought into it. Developing folk tradition and arguing with it at the same
time Gogol reveals that describing food may signify excessive corporeality of life as
well as its entirety. In an effort to spiritual from corporeal the author doesn t deny
«gastronomical» images but complicate the artistic ones.
175
V. Sh. Knvonos...............
Gogol and the Urban Folklore
The paper is concerned with urgent problem of the role of urban folklore in Gogol s
works. This problem is revealed on the texts of «Peterburg Tales». Special attention
has been paid to an analysis of episodes seems to be the most representative from
the point of view of the selected subject. Various manifestations of the principle of
authentcity/non-authentcity in Gogol s poetics are considered.
A. Ch. Goldenberg..................................................185
Exchange of Archetypes: to the Problem of Evolution of the Folklore
Traditions in Gogol s Poetics
The author reconsiders once established comprehension of the evolution of folklore
traditions in Gogol s works. The research is based on the analysis of one of the chap-
ters of the second volume from the «Dead Souls». It is claimed that the role of Russian
folklore in late Gogol s works is increasing.
E. G. Paderina.....................................................196
Card Plot of Gogol and Folk Theater Tradition
The action structure in Gogol s story «Gamblers» is considered from the perspec-
tive of the folk theatre fair tradition. The structure and style elements of theatre fair
performance play an important role in the creation of the intrigue as well as in the
general plot of the story.
Cl. Olivieri.......................................................209
Ukrainian Folklore in the Works of Somov and Gogol
The article compares the work of Somov (in part his cycle dedicated to «the good
robber» Garkusha) and «Evenings on a farm near Dikanka» by Gogol. The two au-
thors moved in the same social circle and read and were published in the same jour-
nals. They interested themselves at the same time in the same subjects: transforming
Ukrainian folk tales into literature. Their work has its roots in Russian-Ukrainian folk-
lore and it describes both everyday and festive life in the households of Little Russia .
Their works («Gaidamak», «Rusalka» and «The Changeling» by Somov; and «The
Fair at Sorochintzi», «The Drowned Maidan» and «A Terrible Vengeance» by Gogol)
are compared in terms of subject matter as well as in linguistic and stylistic-formal
terms. The article concludes that although they do share similar characteristics, the
differences between them are more significant.
N. O. Osipova .....................................................220
MithoiogicalSymboiof«a way» in Art Space of Gogol s «Petersburg Tales»
This article considers the folklore-semiotics aspects of the mythological symbol of 3
«way» in Gogol s «Petersburg Stories», also their artistic realization in the structur-
ally-substantial organization of a cycle.
Седьмые
голевские чтения
O N Nikolenko.....................................* ՛ ·................228
The Theme of Devilry in Gogol s Petersburg Tales ( «Nevsky Prospect»)
The article focuses on the origin, structure and functions of the theme of devilry in
Gogol s story «Nevsky Prospect». The story emphasizes the intensification of the
Christian element in the devilry motive during the petersburg period. The author ana-
lyzed themes that determine and are connected to this theme, such as the present —
fallacy, substitutions, the struggle between light and dark, spiritual challenge, sacrifice,
blood etc. The article uncovers the function of the devilry motive in the story «Nevsky
Prospect»: creation of the «world inside out», revelation of the spiritual transforma-
tion of a person, and artistic research of society.
K. D. Gordovich.......................................................238
The Ridiculous and Terrible in Folklore and Gogol s Stones
In early works of Gogol we met a combination of ridiculous and terrible so typical
for folklore literary works. The fear is overcome, won with the help of laughter. In na-
tional fairy tales and in their literary alterations, ridiculous and terrible meets within
the framework of one text. The characteristic property of Gogol s works consists of
such things that more often the most terrible becomes ridiculous and accordingly
afterwords it not so terrible.
N. I. Ishchuk-Fadeeva. ................................................ 244
The World of Gogol as a «Vicious Place»
At first sight Gogol s «Evenings on a Farm near Dikanka» present the picture of two
worlds. Analysis discovers the single world as a «vicious place». The signs of linking
between the worlds are represented by objects, the tavern, the dream and of course
the characters. Devilry is not outside, but inside the human being. Mimicry, the main
Gogol s principle of this locus mysticus, travesties the world, which is the image and
likeness of God. «The vicious place» thus shows similarities with the God s travesty.
V. V. Vysotskaya......................................................252
Hearsays, Rumors and Gossips in Gogol s Works
The author considers communicative actions such as hearsay, rumors and gossips
from the point of view of their role in the plots of Gogol s prose. The dramatic effect
of hearsay on subject creation is expressed especially vivid in the poem «Dead Souls»,
where the rumors about the strange commerce of Tchitchikov, swiftly disseminate
among the dwellers of town N. It leads him to stop his deals and leave the town hast-
ily. In Gogol s short stories, the communicative actions mentioned above also play a
certain part, though they are not as visible as in the «Dead Souls».
S. N. Patapenko...................................................261
« What wonders are with me...»
Gogol s character, Ivan Khlestakov, is considered in connection with the folklore image
of Ivan the Fool. The typological relationship of these personages is revealed through
a number of outward characteristic features and on the level of their functional role
in the development of the scheme of events.
E. A. Shraga...................................................... 26?
Folk-Legend and Small Talk as a Structural Basis for Prosaic Cycles:
«Evenings on a Farm Near Dikanka» in the Context of the Tradition
On the one hand, this article describes the means of narration peculiar to romantic
«high society» fantastic prose of the first third of the 1 9th century; on the other, it
demonstrates the folklore stylizations of the time. Its thematic and structural similari-
ties help readers discern the differences that go beyond prose styles, but make these
two types of «fantasy» narration incompatible. The meaning and the ways of their
combination in Gogol s cycle is the topic of this article.
M. V. Praskovjina...................................................275
Image of a Border in the «Evenings on a Farm near Dikanka» of N. Gogol
The author traces how N. V. Gogol uses an image of a border in his stories «Evenings
on a Farm near Dikanka». Guided by the theoretical researches of a border the author
shows how these theoretical aspects exist in the works of the great writer. The arti-
cle reveals not only space and temporal borders, but also those of people s and evil
spirit s worlds, borders of characters ranking and borders between the author and
the reader in all levels of Gogol s works.
T. V. Sharbenko.................................................... 281
The Transformation of «the Fair» Concept in «Nevsky Prospect» by
N. Gogol and in «The Heart of a Dog» by M. Bulgakov
The research topic of this article is the transformation of the concept of «the fair»
in the satirical stories «Nevsky Prospect» by N. Gogol and «The Heart of a Dog» by
M. Bulgakov. Special attention is paid to the peculiarities of space and time of the
stories, to the settled motives, images, and plotlines determined by the spirit of the
fair. The article demonstrates the realization of the authors intentions to develop the
meaning of «the fair» concept. Evidence of the development of Gogol s literary artistic
traditions is traced in the literary heritage of M. Bulgakov.
Key words: concept, motive, image, time, space, tradition.
Context: Religion, Philosophic History, Art, Personality
P. V. Mikhed........................................................293
N. V. Gogol and the Great Polish Emigration
The article s author focuses on Gogol s contacts with the representatives of the Great
Polish emigration. Religious quest of Polish intellectuals visibly influenced Gogol s
a
go
eAbMbie c^OroneBCKMe HTeHMfl
oiritual and artistic evolution. This impact is reflected in the writer s work from the
1 840s.
Yu. V. Balakshina ........................................................302
This article analyzes Gogof s notes in the margins of the Slav Bible (1 820). Gogol
made theses notes in the mid-1 840s when he lived abroad. The notes have the form
of drawings, words and lines. The dialog in the margins of the Bible includes all topics
important for Gogol: life and death, word of God and word of man, dean conscience
and prayer, the pilgrims to Saint Earth and creation, the role of women and personal
vocation. The notes reveal new aspects of the text and connect the personal existential
experience of the author with God s Truth that is presented in the Bible s word. After
this dialog Gogol s literary talent grows and becomes deeper and more serious.
E. E. Dmitrieva...........................................................313
Kunstreligion or the Profession of Faith in Gogol s Works.
The article deals with a particular kind of faith, so-called Kunstreligion or religion of
art (a term suggested by German Romanticism), which played a no less significant
role than Orthodoxy, Catholicism or Protestantism in Gogol s writing. In speaking
about such problems the antithesis of art and religion should not be neglected, as
well Gogol s seduction by the Catholic church and its beauty, his quest for religious
love and, finally, his depiction of the Last Judgment in «The Inspector General», which
may be interpreted as a reference to the ironic image of the Last Judgment in the
«Nachtwachen» (Night Watch) of Bonaventura.
R. Guliani ..............................................................326
Historical-Philosophical Views of Gogol and Shevyrev. On «strong un-
tapped folk»
In the story «Rome» we can trace some historical-philosophical views of Gogol, influ-
enced by philosophic historical concept of S. P. Shevyrev, the friend of the writer from
his times in Rome. In 1 846-1 850 Shevyrev published his «History of Russian litera-
ture predominantly the ancient one» and again expressed his philosophic historical
views in the «Introduction» of the book «Storia della letteratura russa e segnatamente
di quella antica», written together with G. Rubini (Florence, 1 862). Comparison of
some fragments from «Rome» by Gogol and «Introduction» by Shevyrev highlight
the similarity of views between both authors in regards to philosophic historical mis-
sion of Romans as well as Russians.
A. V. Dubrovskiy..........................................................336
N. V Gogol and «Imaginary Pushkin» (To a question on authorship of a
poem «The First night»)
In Dubrovsky s clause «N. V Gogol and imaginary Pushkin» (To a question on author-
ship of a poem «The First night») is considered Gogol s attitude to the verses which are
passed from hand to hand under a name of A. S. Pushkin: «The First night» and «t^
Medicine for a cholera». Possibly, under Pushkin Gogol s request «Some words abou
Pushkin» where denied its authorship have appeared in print with clause». Theaut^
of clause analyzes a problem of atribution poem «the First night» («the Kind friend
you know I...»), allocating A. I. Polezhaev s and A. I. Podolinskiy s authorship.
S. V. Ovechkin..............................................................34{
Where does the Devil Come from in Gogol s Works and What Happenec
to Him Next
The figure of the devil is very significant to Gogol s figurative system. In this report
Lacanian psychoanalisis is supplied, which makes possible the conjunction of th*
primary trauma (the case with the drowned cat is considered as an example of sue!
trauma) and of the ideological language, with the intermediate level of phantasms
The morphology of Gogol s plot is given an explanation of a machine of desire tha*
compensates insufficient socialisation. The resume offers criticism of the religion
and philosophical approach from the position of metatheory of conciousness.
V. A. Skavish...............................................................355
Gogol and Psychopathology or the «dead souls» of the Psychologists
The author of this article — psychologist and doctor of medical sciences, reviews the
collection of literary notes regarding a longstanding discussion among psychologist!
about which psychological disease N. Gogol suffered from. The author doesn t share
his colleagues confidence that Gogol suffered from any mental illness. He doubts the
scientific evidence and value of the arguments that author of the «The Dead Souls։
had psychosis and compares the psychologists themselves with «dead souls» tryingto
pathology a writer. The author mentions doctor Kachenovski, who thought that Gog6
was sick and died of malaria and doctor Belysheva, who believed that he died of ty-
phoid, not a mental disease. Mental illness is not only the question of medical science
but of philosophy as well, if we want to properly identify the behavior of a person as
normal or deranged, in particular the personality of Gogol, who lived in another cul-
tural-historical time. In the case of Gogol, we talk about posthumous examination and
it is hard to prove or disprove the idea of «psychosis». Besides that the author criticizes
the very basis of modern psychoanalysis and the philosophy of positivism.
Folk Interpretation of Gogol and Interpretation of the folk Concepts by Gogol
A. Kuritzkaya, L. Sugay................................................357
Gogol and the Problem of Public Education at the Turn of the 20th
Century
One of the main problems stated in the article is, whether Gogol s works were easy
reachable for people masses in Russia before and soon after revolution? Authors re-
Седьмые
£
оголевские чтения
gard lubok editions of Gogol s books, versions of his works adapted for the national
folk theaters and works in verse and prose, devoted to Gogol by self educated writers
came from humble background. The main concept of the present article based on the
A Chekhov s words: «It must not be Gogol who adopted for people masses, but people
masses who must be educated to accept Gogol». The analysis of Gogol s interpretation
of the idea «education» («enlightenment») finished this article. According to authors,
the problem of national education in Russia remained dissolved at the turn of the 20th
century, as far as the Gogol s appreciation of this concept is concerned.
V Yu. Belonogova........................................................377
To the Problem of Apocryphal Stories on Gogol
The article focuses on the rarely published tale «Putimetz» by N. 5. Leskov. It narrates
about one of the episodes from the Ukrainian life of young Gogol, student of the Nezhin
gymnasium. This is the moment when once, on the way to his summer vocations, Gogol
learned a greedy merchant, he met in the roadside tavern, and then repented of his
cruel joke. Putimetz, convicted of sin, has found an abode in monastery.
Leskov gave his story a shape of the folk legend. This tale carries the traits of historical
legendary, parable and the pattern of Gogol s penciling, which has enlarged the gallery of
Leskov s «righteous» characters. On the one hand, «Putimetz» is the example of the crea֊
tion of myth about Gogol in Ukraine, on the other hand, it is the evidence of moral pietism
of Gogol s personality and his creative method in Russian literature of the XJX century.
Yu. V. Rozanov..........................................................382
Viy at Work and Rest: the image of «Horrible Destroyer» in the Works of
Gogol and Remizov
This report deals with the story by Alexei Remizov «Night at Viy s» (1 909) that was
published in his book on the early mythology of the Slavs «To the Sea-Ocean». The
main attention is drawn to the poetic and structural means used by Remizov to cre-
ate his personal version of the image of Viy — as a mythological hero, oriented both
on the folklore sources and Gogol s novel.
S. A. Kibalnik....................................................... . . . 389
«Gogol in Gazdanov s Existential Interpretation»
Two critical essays by Gazdanov on Gogol: «The Notes on Edgare Poe, Gogol and
Mopassan» (1 929) and «On Gogol» (1 960) are analyzed in the article. The author
shows how the writer s approach to Gogol has changed during years between the
dates of their publication and how these changes can be explained.
In opposition to the expressed by many researchers opinion that in his approach
to Gogol Gazdanov is based first of all on Leo Tolstoy s article «On Gogol» (1909)
S. A. Kibalnik proves that of a greater significance for Gazdanov in this issue were Vasiliy
Rozanov s and Leo Shestov s views on Gogol. The reason for this is that Gazdanov is
similar to Rozanov and Shestov in his existential perception of human life.
|
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| author2 | Vikulova, Vera Pavlovna 1956- |
| author2_role | edt |
| author2_variant | v p v vp vpv |
| author_GND | (DE-588)102478469X |
| author_facet | Vikulova, Vera Pavlovna 1956- |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV025562655 |
| classification_rvk | KI 3790 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)315759983 (DE-599)BVBBV025562655 |
| discipline | Slavistik |
| format | Conference Proceeding Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01793nam a2200397 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV025562655</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20170804 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">100417s2008 a||| |||| 10||| rus d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9785887113098</subfield><subfield code="9">978-5-88711-309-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)315759983</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV025562655</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">rus</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-11</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">KI 3790</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)77017:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">N. V. Gogolʹ i narodnaja kulʹtura</subfield><subfield code="b">Sedʹmye Gogolevskie Čtenija ; materialy dokladov i soobščenij Meždunarodnoj Naučnoj Konferencii Moskva, 30 marta - 4 aprelja 2007 goda</subfield><subfield code="c">pod obščej red. V. P. Vikulovoj</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Moskva</subfield><subfield code="b">ČeRo</subfield><subfield code="c">2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">409 S.</subfield><subfield code="b">zahlr. Ill.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gogolʹ, Nikolaj Vasilʹevič</subfield><subfield code="d">1809-1852</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)118540424</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Volkskultur</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4063849-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1071861417</subfield><subfield code="a">Konferenzschrift</subfield><subfield code="y">2007</subfield><subfield code="z">Moskau</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Gogolʹ, Nikolaj Vasilʹevič</subfield><subfield code="d">1809-1852</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)118540424</subfield><subfield code="D">p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Volkskultur</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4063849-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Vikulova, Vera Pavlovna</subfield><subfield code="d">1956-</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)102478469X</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="711" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gogolevskie Čtenija</subfield><subfield code="n">7</subfield><subfield code="d">2007</subfield><subfield code="c">Moskau</subfield><subfield code="j">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)10350783-8</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Passau - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=020161881&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-020161881</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">390</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09034</subfield><subfield code="g">471</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">809</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09034</subfield><subfield code="g">471</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)1071861417 Konferenzschrift 2007 Moskau gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Konferenzschrift 2007 Moskau |
| id | DE-604.BV025562655 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T22:36:33Z |
| institution | BVB |
| institution_GND | (DE-588)10350783-8 |
| isbn | 9785887113098 |
| language | Russian |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-020161881 |
| oclc_num | 315759983 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-11 DE-12 DE-739 |
| owner_facet | DE-11 DE-12 DE-739 |
| physical | 409 S. zahlr. Ill. |
| publishDate | 2008 |
| publishDateSearch | 2008 |
| publishDateSort | 2008 |
| publisher | ČeRo |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | N. V. Gogolʹ i narodnaja kulʹtura Sedʹmye Gogolevskie Čtenija ; materialy dokladov i soobščenij Meždunarodnoj Naučnoj Konferencii Moskva, 30 marta - 4 aprelja 2007 goda pod obščej red. V. P. Vikulovoj Moskva ČeRo 2008 409 S. zahlr. Ill. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Gogolʹ, Nikolaj Vasilʹevič 1809-1852 (DE-588)118540424 gnd rswk-swf Volkskultur (DE-588)4063849-2 gnd rswk-swf (DE-588)1071861417 Konferenzschrift 2007 Moskau gnd-content Gogolʹ, Nikolaj Vasilʹevič 1809-1852 (DE-588)118540424 p Volkskultur (DE-588)4063849-2 s DE-604 Vikulova, Vera Pavlovna 1956- (DE-588)102478469X edt Gogolevskie Čtenija 7 2007 Moskau Sonstige (DE-588)10350783-8 oth Digitalisierung UB Passau - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=020161881&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | N. V. Gogolʹ i narodnaja kulʹtura Sedʹmye Gogolevskie Čtenija ; materialy dokladov i soobščenij Meždunarodnoj Naučnoj Konferencii Moskva, 30 marta - 4 aprelja 2007 goda Gogolʹ, Nikolaj Vasilʹevič 1809-1852 (DE-588)118540424 gnd Volkskultur (DE-588)4063849-2 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)118540424 (DE-588)4063849-2 (DE-588)1071861417 |
| title | N. V. Gogolʹ i narodnaja kulʹtura Sedʹmye Gogolevskie Čtenija ; materialy dokladov i soobščenij Meždunarodnoj Naučnoj Konferencii Moskva, 30 marta - 4 aprelja 2007 goda |
| title_auth | N. V. Gogolʹ i narodnaja kulʹtura Sedʹmye Gogolevskie Čtenija ; materialy dokladov i soobščenij Meždunarodnoj Naučnoj Konferencii Moskva, 30 marta - 4 aprelja 2007 goda |
| title_exact_search | N. V. Gogolʹ i narodnaja kulʹtura Sedʹmye Gogolevskie Čtenija ; materialy dokladov i soobščenij Meždunarodnoj Naučnoj Konferencii Moskva, 30 marta - 4 aprelja 2007 goda |
| title_full | N. V. Gogolʹ i narodnaja kulʹtura Sedʹmye Gogolevskie Čtenija ; materialy dokladov i soobščenij Meždunarodnoj Naučnoj Konferencii Moskva, 30 marta - 4 aprelja 2007 goda pod obščej red. V. P. Vikulovoj |
| title_fullStr | N. V. Gogolʹ i narodnaja kulʹtura Sedʹmye Gogolevskie Čtenija ; materialy dokladov i soobščenij Meždunarodnoj Naučnoj Konferencii Moskva, 30 marta - 4 aprelja 2007 goda pod obščej red. V. P. Vikulovoj |
| title_full_unstemmed | N. V. Gogolʹ i narodnaja kulʹtura Sedʹmye Gogolevskie Čtenija ; materialy dokladov i soobščenij Meždunarodnoj Naučnoj Konferencii Moskva, 30 marta - 4 aprelja 2007 goda pod obščej red. V. P. Vikulovoj |
| title_short | N. V. Gogolʹ i narodnaja kulʹtura |
| title_sort | n v gogolʹ i narodnaja kulʹtura sedʹmye gogolevskie ctenija materialy dokladov i soobscenij mezdunarodnoj naucnoj konferencii moskva 30 marta 4 aprelja 2007 goda |
| title_sub | Sedʹmye Gogolevskie Čtenija ; materialy dokladov i soobščenij Meždunarodnoj Naučnoj Konferencii Moskva, 30 marta - 4 aprelja 2007 goda |
| topic | Gogolʹ, Nikolaj Vasilʹevič 1809-1852 (DE-588)118540424 gnd Volkskultur (DE-588)4063849-2 gnd |
| topic_facet | Gogolʹ, Nikolaj Vasilʹevič 1809-1852 Volkskultur Konferenzschrift 2007 Moskau |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=020161881&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT vikulovaverapavlovna nvgogolʹinarodnajakulʹturasedʹmyegogolevskiectenijamaterialydokladovisoobscenijmezdunarodnojnaucnojkonferenciimoskva30marta4aprelja2007goda AT gogolevskiectenijamoskau nvgogolʹinarodnajakulʹturasedʹmyegogolevskiectenijamaterialydokladovisoobscenijmezdunarodnojnaucnojkonferenciimoskva30marta4aprelja2007goda |