Why don't inventors patent?:
This paper argues that the ability to keep innovations secret may be a key determinant of patenting. To test this hypothesis, the paper examines a newly-collected data set of more than 7,000 American and British innovations at four world's fairs between 1851 and 1915. Exhibition data show that...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge, Mass.
National Bureau of Economic Research
2007
|
Schriftenreihe: | Working paper series / National Bureau of Economic Research
13294 |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | This paper argues that the ability to keep innovations secret may be a key determinant of patenting. To test this hypothesis, the paper examines a newly-collected data set of more than 7,000 American and British innovations at four world's fairs between 1851 and 1915. Exhibition data show that the industry where an innovation is made is the single most important determinant of patenting. Urbanization, high innovative quality, and low costs of patenting also encourage patenting, but these influences are small compared with industry effects. If the effectiveness of secrecy is an important factor in inventors' patenting decisions, scientific breakthroughs, which facilitate reverse-engineering, should increase inventors' propensity to patent. The discovery of the periodic table in 1869 offers an opportunity to test this idea. Exhibition data show that patenting rates for chemical innovations increased substantially after the introduction of the periodic table, both over time and relative to other industries. |
Beschreibung: | 48 S. graph. Darst. 22 cm |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zcb4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV023593197 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20080327000000.0 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 070907s2007 xxud||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)255806141 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)GBV539975796 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
044 | |a xxu |c XD-US | ||
049 | |a DE-521 | ||
050 | 0 | |a HB1 | |
100 | 1 | |a Moser, Petra |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)128736887 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Why don't inventors patent? |c Petra Moser |
264 | 1 | |a Cambridge, Mass. |b National Bureau of Economic Research |c 2007 | |
300 | |a 48 S. |b graph. Darst. |c 22 cm | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a Working paper series / National Bureau of Economic Research |v 13294 | |
520 | 8 | |a This paper argues that the ability to keep innovations secret may be a key determinant of patenting. To test this hypothesis, the paper examines a newly-collected data set of more than 7,000 American and British innovations at four world's fairs between 1851 and 1915. Exhibition data show that the industry where an innovation is made is the single most important determinant of patenting. Urbanization, high innovative quality, and low costs of patenting also encourage patenting, but these influences are small compared with industry effects. If the effectiveness of secrecy is an important factor in inventors' patenting decisions, scientific breakthroughs, which facilitate reverse-engineering, should increase inventors' propensity to patent. The discovery of the periodic table in 1869 offers an opportunity to test this idea. Exhibition data show that patenting rates for chemical innovations increased substantially after the introduction of the periodic table, both over time and relative to other industries. | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |
810 | 2 | |a National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.> |t NBER working paper series |v 13294 |w (DE-604)BV002801238 |9 13294 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://papers.nber.org/papers/w13294.pdf |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016908527 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804138252488146944 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Moser, Petra |
author_GND | (DE-588)128736887 |
author_facet | Moser, Petra |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Moser, Petra |
author_variant | p m pm |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV023593197 |
callnumber-first | H - Social Science |
callnumber-label | HB1 |
callnumber-raw | HB1 |
callnumber-search | HB1 |
callnumber-sort | HB 11 |
callnumber-subject | HB - Economic Theory and Demography |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)255806141 (DE-599)GBV539975796 |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02122nam a2200325zcb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV023593197</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20080327000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">070907s2007 xxud||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)255806141</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)GBV539975796</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxu</subfield><subfield code="c">XD-US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HB1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Moser, Petra</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)128736887</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Why don't inventors patent?</subfield><subfield code="c">Petra Moser</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge, Mass.</subfield><subfield code="b">National Bureau of Economic Research</subfield><subfield code="c">2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">48 S.</subfield><subfield code="b">graph. Darst.</subfield><subfield code="c">22 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Working paper series / National Bureau of Economic Research</subfield><subfield code="v">13294</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper argues that the ability to keep innovations secret may be a key determinant of patenting. To test this hypothesis, the paper examines a newly-collected data set of more than 7,000 American and British innovations at four world's fairs between 1851 and 1915. Exhibition data show that the industry where an innovation is made is the single most important determinant of patenting. Urbanization, high innovative quality, and low costs of patenting also encourage patenting, but these influences are small compared with industry effects. If the effectiveness of secrecy is an important factor in inventors' patenting decisions, scientific breakthroughs, which facilitate reverse-engineering, should increase inventors' propensity to patent. The discovery of the periodic table in 1869 offers an opportunity to test this idea. Exhibition data show that patenting rates for chemical innovations increased substantially after the introduction of the periodic table, both over time and relative to other industries.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="810" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.></subfield><subfield code="t">NBER working paper series</subfield><subfield code="v">13294</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV002801238</subfield><subfield code="9">13294</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://papers.nber.org/papers/w13294.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016908527</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV023593197 |
illustrated | Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-02T22:41:31Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T21:25:14Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016908527 |
oclc_num | 255806141 |
open_access_boolean | 1 |
owner | DE-521 |
owner_facet | DE-521 |
physical | 48 S. graph. Darst. 22 cm |
publishDate | 2007 |
publishDateSearch | 2007 |
publishDateSort | 2007 |
publisher | National Bureau of Economic Research |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Working paper series / National Bureau of Economic Research |
spelling | Moser, Petra Verfasser (DE-588)128736887 aut Why don't inventors patent? Petra Moser Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 2007 48 S. graph. Darst. 22 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Working paper series / National Bureau of Economic Research 13294 This paper argues that the ability to keep innovations secret may be a key determinant of patenting. To test this hypothesis, the paper examines a newly-collected data set of more than 7,000 American and British innovations at four world's fairs between 1851 and 1915. Exhibition data show that the industry where an innovation is made is the single most important determinant of patenting. Urbanization, high innovative quality, and low costs of patenting also encourage patenting, but these influences are small compared with industry effects. If the effectiveness of secrecy is an important factor in inventors' patenting decisions, scientific breakthroughs, which facilitate reverse-engineering, should increase inventors' propensity to patent. The discovery of the periodic table in 1869 offers an opportunity to test this idea. Exhibition data show that patenting rates for chemical innovations increased substantially after the introduction of the periodic table, both over time and relative to other industries. Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.> NBER working paper series 13294 (DE-604)BV002801238 13294 http://papers.nber.org/papers/w13294.pdf kostenfrei Volltext |
spellingShingle | Moser, Petra Why don't inventors patent? |
title | Why don't inventors patent? |
title_auth | Why don't inventors patent? |
title_exact_search | Why don't inventors patent? |
title_exact_search_txtP | Why don't inventors patent? |
title_full | Why don't inventors patent? Petra Moser |
title_fullStr | Why don't inventors patent? Petra Moser |
title_full_unstemmed | Why don't inventors patent? Petra Moser |
title_short | Why don't inventors patent? |
title_sort | why don t inventors patent |
url | http://papers.nber.org/papers/w13294.pdf |
volume_link | (DE-604)BV002801238 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moserpetra whydontinventorspatent |