Welfare reform, returns to experience, and wages: using reservation wages to account for sample selection bias
"Work was one of the central motivations for welfare reform during the 1990s. One important rationale for work was based on human capital theory: work today should raise experience tomorrow, which in turn should raise future wage offers and reduce dependency on aid. Despite the importance of th...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge, Mass.
National Bureau of Economic Research
2005
|
Schriftenreihe: | National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series
11621 |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | "Work was one of the central motivations for welfare reform during the 1990s. One important rationale for work was based on human capital theory: work today should raise experience tomorrow, which in turn should raise future wage offers and reduce dependency on aid. Despite the importance of the this notion, few studies have estimated the effect of welfare reform on wages. Furthermore, several recent analyses suggest that low-skill workers, such as welfare recipients, enjoy only meager returns to experience, undermining the link between welfare reform and wages. An important analytical obstacle is the sample selection problem. Since non-employment levels are high and workers are unlikely to represent a random sample from the population of former recipients, estimates that fail to account for sample selection could be seriously biased.In this paper, I propose a method to solve the selection problem based on the use of reservation wage data. Reservation wage data allow one to solve the problem using censored regression methods. Furthermore, the use of reservation wage data obviates the need for the controversial exclusion restrictions sometimes used to identify familiar two-step sample selection estimators. Correcting for sample selection bias matters a great deal empirically. Estimates from models that lack such corrections suggest that welfare recipients gain little from work experience. Estimates based on the reservation wage approach suggest that they enjoy returns similar to those estimated from other samples of workers. They also suggest that the particular reform program that I analyze may have raised wages modestly"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site. |
Beschreibung: | 44 S. graph. Darst. |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zcb4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV023591680 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20100322 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 051214s2005 xxud||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)62082841 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV023591680 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
044 | |a xxu |c XD-US | ||
049 | |a DE-521 |a DE-19 | ||
050 | 0 | |a HB1 | |
100 | 1 | |a Grogger, Jeff |d 1959- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)124736661 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Welfare reform, returns to experience, and wages |b using reservation wages to account for sample selection bias |c Jeffrey Grogger |
264 | 1 | |a Cambridge, Mass. |b National Bureau of Economic Research |c 2005 | |
300 | |a 44 S. |b graph. Darst. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series |v 11621 | |
520 | 3 | |a "Work was one of the central motivations for welfare reform during the 1990s. One important rationale for work was based on human capital theory: work today should raise experience tomorrow, which in turn should raise future wage offers and reduce dependency on aid. Despite the importance of the this notion, few studies have estimated the effect of welfare reform on wages. Furthermore, several recent analyses suggest that low-skill workers, such as welfare recipients, enjoy only meager returns to experience, undermining the link between welfare reform and wages. An important analytical obstacle is the sample selection problem. Since non-employment levels are high and workers are unlikely to represent a random sample from the population of former recipients, estimates that fail to account for sample selection could be seriously biased.In this paper, I propose a method to solve the selection problem based on the use of reservation wage data. Reservation wage data allow one to solve the problem using censored regression methods. Furthermore, the use of reservation wage data obviates the need for the controversial exclusion restrictions sometimes used to identify familiar two-step sample selection estimators. Correcting for sample selection bias matters a great deal empirically. Estimates from models that lack such corrections suggest that welfare recipients gain little from work experience. Estimates based on the reservation wage approach suggest that they enjoy returns similar to those estimated from other samples of workers. They also suggest that the particular reform program that I analyze may have raised wages modestly"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site. | |
650 | 4 | |a Public welfare |z United States | |
650 | 4 | |a Unskilled labor |z United States | |
651 | 4 | |a USA | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |
830 | 0 | |a National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series |v 11621 |w (DE-604)BV002801238 |9 11621 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://papers.nber.org/papers/w11621.pdf |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016907010 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804138249324593152 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Grogger, Jeff 1959- |
author_GND | (DE-588)124736661 |
author_facet | Grogger, Jeff 1959- |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Grogger, Jeff 1959- |
author_variant | j g jg |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV023591680 |
callnumber-first | H - Social Science |
callnumber-label | HB1 |
callnumber-raw | HB1 |
callnumber-search | HB1 |
callnumber-sort | HB 11 |
callnumber-subject | HB - Economic Theory and Demography |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)62082841 (DE-599)BVBBV023591680 |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03032nam a2200361zcb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV023591680</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20100322 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">051214s2005 xxud||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)62082841</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV023591680</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxu</subfield><subfield code="c">XD-US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HB1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Grogger, Jeff</subfield><subfield code="d">1959-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)124736661</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Welfare reform, returns to experience, and wages</subfield><subfield code="b">using reservation wages to account for sample selection bias</subfield><subfield code="c">Jeffrey Grogger</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge, Mass.</subfield><subfield code="b">National Bureau of Economic Research</subfield><subfield code="c">2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">44 S.</subfield><subfield code="b">graph. Darst.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series</subfield><subfield code="v">11621</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Work was one of the central motivations for welfare reform during the 1990s. One important rationale for work was based on human capital theory: work today should raise experience tomorrow, which in turn should raise future wage offers and reduce dependency on aid. Despite the importance of the this notion, few studies have estimated the effect of welfare reform on wages. Furthermore, several recent analyses suggest that low-skill workers, such as welfare recipients, enjoy only meager returns to experience, undermining the link between welfare reform and wages. An important analytical obstacle is the sample selection problem. Since non-employment levels are high and workers are unlikely to represent a random sample from the population of former recipients, estimates that fail to account for sample selection could be seriously biased.In this paper, I propose a method to solve the selection problem based on the use of reservation wage data. Reservation wage data allow one to solve the problem using censored regression methods. Furthermore, the use of reservation wage data obviates the need for the controversial exclusion restrictions sometimes used to identify familiar two-step sample selection estimators. Correcting for sample selection bias matters a great deal empirically. Estimates from models that lack such corrections suggest that welfare recipients gain little from work experience. Estimates based on the reservation wage approach suggest that they enjoy returns similar to those estimated from other samples of workers. They also suggest that the particular reform program that I analyze may have raised wages modestly"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public welfare</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Unskilled labor</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series</subfield><subfield code="v">11621</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV002801238</subfield><subfield code="9">11621</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://papers.nber.org/papers/w11621.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016907010</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | USA |
geographic_facet | USA |
id | DE-604.BV023591680 |
illustrated | Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-02T22:41:28Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T21:25:11Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016907010 |
oclc_num | 62082841 |
open_access_boolean | 1 |
owner | DE-521 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
owner_facet | DE-521 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
physical | 44 S. graph. Darst. |
publishDate | 2005 |
publishDateSearch | 2005 |
publishDateSort | 2005 |
publisher | National Bureau of Economic Research |
record_format | marc |
series | National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series |
series2 | National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series |
spelling | Grogger, Jeff 1959- Verfasser (DE-588)124736661 aut Welfare reform, returns to experience, and wages using reservation wages to account for sample selection bias Jeffrey Grogger Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 2005 44 S. graph. Darst. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series 11621 "Work was one of the central motivations for welfare reform during the 1990s. One important rationale for work was based on human capital theory: work today should raise experience tomorrow, which in turn should raise future wage offers and reduce dependency on aid. Despite the importance of the this notion, few studies have estimated the effect of welfare reform on wages. Furthermore, several recent analyses suggest that low-skill workers, such as welfare recipients, enjoy only meager returns to experience, undermining the link between welfare reform and wages. An important analytical obstacle is the sample selection problem. Since non-employment levels are high and workers are unlikely to represent a random sample from the population of former recipients, estimates that fail to account for sample selection could be seriously biased.In this paper, I propose a method to solve the selection problem based on the use of reservation wage data. Reservation wage data allow one to solve the problem using censored regression methods. Furthermore, the use of reservation wage data obviates the need for the controversial exclusion restrictions sometimes used to identify familiar two-step sample selection estimators. Correcting for sample selection bias matters a great deal empirically. Estimates from models that lack such corrections suggest that welfare recipients gain little from work experience. Estimates based on the reservation wage approach suggest that they enjoy returns similar to those estimated from other samples of workers. They also suggest that the particular reform program that I analyze may have raised wages modestly"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site. Public welfare United States Unskilled labor United States USA Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series 11621 (DE-604)BV002801238 11621 http://papers.nber.org/papers/w11621.pdf kostenfrei Volltext |
spellingShingle | Grogger, Jeff 1959- Welfare reform, returns to experience, and wages using reservation wages to account for sample selection bias National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series Public welfare United States Unskilled labor United States |
title | Welfare reform, returns to experience, and wages using reservation wages to account for sample selection bias |
title_auth | Welfare reform, returns to experience, and wages using reservation wages to account for sample selection bias |
title_exact_search | Welfare reform, returns to experience, and wages using reservation wages to account for sample selection bias |
title_exact_search_txtP | Welfare reform, returns to experience, and wages using reservation wages to account for sample selection bias |
title_full | Welfare reform, returns to experience, and wages using reservation wages to account for sample selection bias Jeffrey Grogger |
title_fullStr | Welfare reform, returns to experience, and wages using reservation wages to account for sample selection bias Jeffrey Grogger |
title_full_unstemmed | Welfare reform, returns to experience, and wages using reservation wages to account for sample selection bias Jeffrey Grogger |
title_short | Welfare reform, returns to experience, and wages |
title_sort | welfare reform returns to experience and wages using reservation wages to account for sample selection bias |
title_sub | using reservation wages to account for sample selection bias |
topic | Public welfare United States Unskilled labor United States |
topic_facet | Public welfare United States Unskilled labor United States USA |
url | http://papers.nber.org/papers/w11621.pdf |
volume_link | (DE-604)BV002801238 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT groggerjeff welfarereformreturnstoexperienceandwagesusingreservationwagestoaccountforsampleselectionbias |