Do macro variables, asset markets or surveys forecast inflation better?:
Surveys do! We examine the forecasting power of four alternative methods of forecasting U.S. inflation out-of-sample: time series ARIMA models; regressions using real activity measures motivated from the Phillips curve; term structure models that include linear, non-linear, and arbitrage-free specif...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge, Mass.
National Bureau of Economic Research
2005
|
Schriftenreihe: | Working paper series / National Bureau of Economic Research
11538 |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | Surveys do! We examine the forecasting power of four alternative methods of forecasting U.S. inflation out-of-sample: time series ARIMA models; regressions using real activity measures motivated from the Phillips curve; term structure models that include linear, non-linear, and arbitrage-free specifications; and survey-based measures. We also investigate several optimal methods of combining forecasts. Our results show that surveys outperform the other forecasting methods and that the term structure specifications perform relatively poorly. We find little evidence that combining forecasts using means or medians, or using optimal weights with prior information produces superior forecasts to survey information alone. When combining forecasts, the data consistently places the highest weights on survey information. |
Beschreibung: | 53 S. graph. Darst. 22 cm |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zcb4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV023591615 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20080327000000.0 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 051020s2005 xxud||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)255118751 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV023591615 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
044 | |a xxu |c XD-US | ||
049 | |a DE-521 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Ang, Andrew |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)124420907 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Do macro variables, asset markets or surveys forecast inflation better? |c Andrew Ang ; Geert Bekaert ; Min Wei |
264 | 1 | |a Cambridge, Mass. |b National Bureau of Economic Research |c 2005 | |
300 | |a 53 S. |b graph. Darst. |c 22 cm | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a Working paper series / National Bureau of Economic Research |v 11538 | |
520 | |a Surveys do! We examine the forecasting power of four alternative methods of forecasting U.S. inflation out-of-sample: time series ARIMA models; regressions using real activity measures motivated from the Phillips curve; term structure models that include linear, non-linear, and arbitrage-free specifications; and survey-based measures. We also investigate several optimal methods of combining forecasts. Our results show that surveys outperform the other forecasting methods and that the term structure specifications perform relatively poorly. We find little evidence that combining forecasts using means or medians, or using optimal weights with prior information produces superior forecasts to survey information alone. When combining forecasts, the data consistently places the highest weights on survey information. | ||
700 | 1 | |a Bekaert, Geert |d 1964- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)128834927 |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wei, Min |d 1975- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)129357472 |4 aut | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |
810 | 2 | |a National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.> |t NBER working paper series |v 11538 |w (DE-604)BV002801238 |9 11538 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://papers.nber.org/papers/w11538.pdf |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016906945 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804138249148432384 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Ang, Andrew Bekaert, Geert 1964- Wei, Min 1975- |
author_GND | (DE-588)124420907 (DE-588)128834927 (DE-588)129357472 |
author_facet | Ang, Andrew Bekaert, Geert 1964- Wei, Min 1975- |
author_role | aut aut aut |
author_sort | Ang, Andrew |
author_variant | a a aa g b gb m w mw |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV023591615 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)255118751 (DE-599)BVBBV023591615 |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02114nam a2200337zcb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV023591615</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20080327000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">051020s2005 xxud||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)255118751</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV023591615</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxu</subfield><subfield code="c">XD-US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ang, Andrew</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)124420907</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Do macro variables, asset markets or surveys forecast inflation better?</subfield><subfield code="c">Andrew Ang ; Geert Bekaert ; Min Wei</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge, Mass.</subfield><subfield code="b">National Bureau of Economic Research</subfield><subfield code="c">2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">53 S.</subfield><subfield code="b">graph. Darst.</subfield><subfield code="c">22 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Working paper series / National Bureau of Economic Research</subfield><subfield code="v">11538</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Surveys do! We examine the forecasting power of four alternative methods of forecasting U.S. inflation out-of-sample: time series ARIMA models; regressions using real activity measures motivated from the Phillips curve; term structure models that include linear, non-linear, and arbitrage-free specifications; and survey-based measures. We also investigate several optimal methods of combining forecasts. Our results show that surveys outperform the other forecasting methods and that the term structure specifications perform relatively poorly. We find little evidence that combining forecasts using means or medians, or using optimal weights with prior information produces superior forecasts to survey information alone. When combining forecasts, the data consistently places the highest weights on survey information.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bekaert, Geert</subfield><subfield code="d">1964-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)128834927</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wei, Min</subfield><subfield code="d">1975-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)129357472</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="810" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.></subfield><subfield code="t">NBER working paper series</subfield><subfield code="v">11538</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV002801238</subfield><subfield code="9">11538</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://papers.nber.org/papers/w11538.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016906945</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV023591615 |
illustrated | Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-02T22:41:28Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T21:25:11Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016906945 |
oclc_num | 255118751 |
open_access_boolean | 1 |
owner | DE-521 |
owner_facet | DE-521 |
physical | 53 S. graph. Darst. 22 cm |
publishDate | 2005 |
publishDateSearch | 2005 |
publishDateSort | 2005 |
publisher | National Bureau of Economic Research |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Working paper series / National Bureau of Economic Research |
spelling | Ang, Andrew Verfasser (DE-588)124420907 aut Do macro variables, asset markets or surveys forecast inflation better? Andrew Ang ; Geert Bekaert ; Min Wei Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 2005 53 S. graph. Darst. 22 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Working paper series / National Bureau of Economic Research 11538 Surveys do! We examine the forecasting power of four alternative methods of forecasting U.S. inflation out-of-sample: time series ARIMA models; regressions using real activity measures motivated from the Phillips curve; term structure models that include linear, non-linear, and arbitrage-free specifications; and survey-based measures. We also investigate several optimal methods of combining forecasts. Our results show that surveys outperform the other forecasting methods and that the term structure specifications perform relatively poorly. We find little evidence that combining forecasts using means or medians, or using optimal weights with prior information produces superior forecasts to survey information alone. When combining forecasts, the data consistently places the highest weights on survey information. Bekaert, Geert 1964- Verfasser (DE-588)128834927 aut Wei, Min 1975- Verfasser (DE-588)129357472 aut Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.> NBER working paper series 11538 (DE-604)BV002801238 11538 http://papers.nber.org/papers/w11538.pdf kostenfrei Volltext |
spellingShingle | Ang, Andrew Bekaert, Geert 1964- Wei, Min 1975- Do macro variables, asset markets or surveys forecast inflation better? |
title | Do macro variables, asset markets or surveys forecast inflation better? |
title_auth | Do macro variables, asset markets or surveys forecast inflation better? |
title_exact_search | Do macro variables, asset markets or surveys forecast inflation better? |
title_exact_search_txtP | Do macro variables, asset markets or surveys forecast inflation better? |
title_full | Do macro variables, asset markets or surveys forecast inflation better? Andrew Ang ; Geert Bekaert ; Min Wei |
title_fullStr | Do macro variables, asset markets or surveys forecast inflation better? Andrew Ang ; Geert Bekaert ; Min Wei |
title_full_unstemmed | Do macro variables, asset markets or surveys forecast inflation better? Andrew Ang ; Geert Bekaert ; Min Wei |
title_short | Do macro variables, asset markets or surveys forecast inflation better? |
title_sort | do macro variables asset markets or surveys forecast inflation better |
url | http://papers.nber.org/papers/w11538.pdf |
volume_link | (DE-604)BV002801238 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT angandrew domacrovariablesassetmarketsorsurveysforecastinflationbetter AT bekaertgeert domacrovariablesassetmarketsorsurveysforecastinflationbetter AT weimin domacrovariablesassetmarketsorsurveysforecastinflationbetter |