How do incumbents respond to the threat of entry?: evidence from major airlines
"This paper examines how incumbents respond to the threat of entry of competitors, as distinguished from their response to competitors' actual entry. It uses a case study from the passenger airline industry--specifically, the evolution of Southwest Airlines' route network--to identify...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge, Mass.
National Bureau of Economic Research
2005
|
Schriftenreihe: | National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series
10072 |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | "This paper examines how incumbents respond to the threat of entry of competitors, as distinguished from their response to competitors' actual entry. It uses a case study from the passenger airline industry--specifically, the evolution of Southwest Airlines' route network--to identify particular routes where the probability of future entry rises abruptly. When Southwest begins operating in airports on both sides of a route but not the route itself, this dramatically raises the chance they will start flying that route in the near future. We examine the pricing of the incumbents on threatened routes in the period surrounding such events. We find that incumbents cut fares significantly when threatened by Southwest's entry into their routes. This is true even after controlling in several ways for airport-specific operating costs. The response of incumbents seems to be limited only to the threatened route itself, and not to routes out of nearby competitor airports where Southwest does not operate (e.g., fares drop on routes from Chicago Midway but not Chicago O'Hare). The largest responses appear to be restricted to routes that were concentrated beforehand. Incumbents do experience short-run increases in their passenger loads concurrent with these fare cuts. This is consistent with theories implying incumbents will try to generate some longer-term loyalty among current customers before the entry of a new competitor. We examine evidence relating this demand-building motive to frequent flyer programs and find suggestive evidence in favor of this notion. There is only weak evidence that incumbents increase capacity on the routes"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site. |
Beschreibung: | 18, [11] S. graph. Darst. |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zcb4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV023591254 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20100212 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 050204s2005 xxud||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)57672737 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV023591254 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
044 | |a xxu |c XD-US | ||
049 | |a DE-521 |a DE-19 | ||
050 | 0 | |a HB1 | |
100 | 1 | |a Goolsbee, Austan |d 1969- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)129799521 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a How do incumbents respond to the threat of entry? |b evidence from major airlines |c Austan Goolsbee ; Chad Syverson |
264 | 1 | |a Cambridge, Mass. |b National Bureau of Economic Research |c 2005 | |
300 | |a 18, [11] S. |b graph. Darst. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series |v 10072 | |
520 | 3 | |a "This paper examines how incumbents respond to the threat of entry of competitors, as distinguished from their response to competitors' actual entry. It uses a case study from the passenger airline industry--specifically, the evolution of Southwest Airlines' route network--to identify particular routes where the probability of future entry rises abruptly. When Southwest begins operating in airports on both sides of a route but not the route itself, this dramatically raises the chance they will start flying that route in the near future. We examine the pricing of the incumbents on threatened routes in the period surrounding such events. We find that incumbents cut fares significantly when threatened by Southwest's entry into their routes. This is true even after controlling in several ways for airport-specific operating costs. The response of incumbents seems to be limited only to the threatened route itself, and not to routes out of nearby competitor airports where Southwest does not operate (e.g., fares drop on routes from Chicago Midway but not Chicago O'Hare). The largest responses appear to be restricted to routes that were concentrated beforehand. Incumbents do experience short-run increases in their passenger loads concurrent with these fare cuts. This is consistent with theories implying incumbents will try to generate some longer-term loyalty among current customers before the entry of a new competitor. We examine evidence relating this demand-building motive to frequent flyer programs and find suggestive evidence in favor of this notion. There is only weak evidence that incumbents increase capacity on the routes"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site. | |
650 | 4 | |a Ökonometrisches Modell | |
650 | 4 | |a Airlines |x Economic aspects | |
650 | 4 | |a Competition |x Econometric models | |
700 | 1 | |a Syverson, Chad |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)128637439 |4 aut | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |
830 | 0 | |a National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series |v 10072 |w (DE-604)BV002801238 |9 11072 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://papers.nber.org/papers/w11072.pdf |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016906584 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804138248668184576 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Goolsbee, Austan 1969- Syverson, Chad |
author_GND | (DE-588)129799521 (DE-588)128637439 |
author_facet | Goolsbee, Austan 1969- Syverson, Chad |
author_role | aut aut |
author_sort | Goolsbee, Austan 1969- |
author_variant | a g ag c s cs |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV023591254 |
callnumber-first | H - Social Science |
callnumber-label | HB1 |
callnumber-raw | HB1 |
callnumber-search | HB1 |
callnumber-sort | HB 11 |
callnumber-subject | HB - Economic Theory and Demography |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)57672737 (DE-599)BVBBV023591254 |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03110nam a2200373zcb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV023591254</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20100212 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">050204s2005 xxud||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)57672737</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV023591254</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxu</subfield><subfield code="c">XD-US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HB1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Goolsbee, Austan</subfield><subfield code="d">1969-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)129799521</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">How do incumbents respond to the threat of entry?</subfield><subfield code="b">evidence from major airlines</subfield><subfield code="c">Austan Goolsbee ; Chad Syverson</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge, Mass.</subfield><subfield code="b">National Bureau of Economic Research</subfield><subfield code="c">2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">18, [11] S.</subfield><subfield code="b">graph. Darst.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series</subfield><subfield code="v">10072</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"This paper examines how incumbents respond to the threat of entry of competitors, as distinguished from their response to competitors' actual entry. It uses a case study from the passenger airline industry--specifically, the evolution of Southwest Airlines' route network--to identify particular routes where the probability of future entry rises abruptly. When Southwest begins operating in airports on both sides of a route but not the route itself, this dramatically raises the chance they will start flying that route in the near future. We examine the pricing of the incumbents on threatened routes in the period surrounding such events. We find that incumbents cut fares significantly when threatened by Southwest's entry into their routes. This is true even after controlling in several ways for airport-specific operating costs. The response of incumbents seems to be limited only to the threatened route itself, and not to routes out of nearby competitor airports where Southwest does not operate (e.g., fares drop on routes from Chicago Midway but not Chicago O'Hare). The largest responses appear to be restricted to routes that were concentrated beforehand. Incumbents do experience short-run increases in their passenger loads concurrent with these fare cuts. This is consistent with theories implying incumbents will try to generate some longer-term loyalty among current customers before the entry of a new competitor. We examine evidence relating this demand-building motive to frequent flyer programs and find suggestive evidence in favor of this notion. There is only weak evidence that incumbents increase capacity on the routes"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ökonometrisches Modell</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Airlines</subfield><subfield code="x">Economic aspects</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Competition</subfield><subfield code="x">Econometric models</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Syverson, Chad</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)128637439</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series</subfield><subfield code="v">10072</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV002801238</subfield><subfield code="9">11072</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://papers.nber.org/papers/w11072.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016906584</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV023591254 |
illustrated | Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-02T22:41:28Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T21:25:10Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016906584 |
oclc_num | 57672737 |
open_access_boolean | 1 |
owner | DE-521 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
owner_facet | DE-521 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
physical | 18, [11] S. graph. Darst. |
publishDate | 2005 |
publishDateSearch | 2005 |
publishDateSort | 2005 |
publisher | National Bureau of Economic Research |
record_format | marc |
series | National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series |
series2 | National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series |
spelling | Goolsbee, Austan 1969- Verfasser (DE-588)129799521 aut How do incumbents respond to the threat of entry? evidence from major airlines Austan Goolsbee ; Chad Syverson Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 2005 18, [11] S. graph. Darst. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series 10072 "This paper examines how incumbents respond to the threat of entry of competitors, as distinguished from their response to competitors' actual entry. It uses a case study from the passenger airline industry--specifically, the evolution of Southwest Airlines' route network--to identify particular routes where the probability of future entry rises abruptly. When Southwest begins operating in airports on both sides of a route but not the route itself, this dramatically raises the chance they will start flying that route in the near future. We examine the pricing of the incumbents on threatened routes in the period surrounding such events. We find that incumbents cut fares significantly when threatened by Southwest's entry into their routes. This is true even after controlling in several ways for airport-specific operating costs. The response of incumbents seems to be limited only to the threatened route itself, and not to routes out of nearby competitor airports where Southwest does not operate (e.g., fares drop on routes from Chicago Midway but not Chicago O'Hare). The largest responses appear to be restricted to routes that were concentrated beforehand. Incumbents do experience short-run increases in their passenger loads concurrent with these fare cuts. This is consistent with theories implying incumbents will try to generate some longer-term loyalty among current customers before the entry of a new competitor. We examine evidence relating this demand-building motive to frequent flyer programs and find suggestive evidence in favor of this notion. There is only weak evidence that incumbents increase capacity on the routes"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site. Ökonometrisches Modell Airlines Economic aspects Competition Econometric models Syverson, Chad Verfasser (DE-588)128637439 aut Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series 10072 (DE-604)BV002801238 11072 http://papers.nber.org/papers/w11072.pdf kostenfrei Volltext |
spellingShingle | Goolsbee, Austan 1969- Syverson, Chad How do incumbents respond to the threat of entry? evidence from major airlines National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series Ökonometrisches Modell Airlines Economic aspects Competition Econometric models |
title | How do incumbents respond to the threat of entry? evidence from major airlines |
title_auth | How do incumbents respond to the threat of entry? evidence from major airlines |
title_exact_search | How do incumbents respond to the threat of entry? evidence from major airlines |
title_exact_search_txtP | How do incumbents respond to the threat of entry? evidence from major airlines |
title_full | How do incumbents respond to the threat of entry? evidence from major airlines Austan Goolsbee ; Chad Syverson |
title_fullStr | How do incumbents respond to the threat of entry? evidence from major airlines Austan Goolsbee ; Chad Syverson |
title_full_unstemmed | How do incumbents respond to the threat of entry? evidence from major airlines Austan Goolsbee ; Chad Syverson |
title_short | How do incumbents respond to the threat of entry? |
title_sort | how do incumbents respond to the threat of entry evidence from major airlines |
title_sub | evidence from major airlines |
topic | Ökonometrisches Modell Airlines Economic aspects Competition Econometric models |
topic_facet | Ökonometrisches Modell Airlines Economic aspects Competition Econometric models |
url | http://papers.nber.org/papers/w11072.pdf |
volume_link | (DE-604)BV002801238 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goolsbeeaustan howdoincumbentsrespondtothethreatofentryevidencefrommajorairlines AT syversonchad howdoincumbentsrespondtothethreatofentryevidencefrommajorairlines |