Does competition reduce costs?: assessing the impact of regulatory restructuring on U.S. electric generation efficiency
"Although the allocative efficiency benefits of competition are a tenet of microeconomic theory, the relation between competition and technical efficiency is less clear. Neoclassical models of profit-maximization subsume static cost-minimizing behavior regardless of market competitiveness, but...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge, Mass.
National Bureau of Economic Research
2004
|
Schriftenreihe: | National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series
11001 |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | "Although the allocative efficiency benefits of competition are a tenet of microeconomic theory, the relation between competition and technical efficiency is less clear. Neoclassical models of profit-maximization subsume static cost-minimizing behavior regardless of market competitiveness, but traditional cost-of-service regulation may mitigate incentives for cost-minimization, and agency models of managerial behavior suggest possible scope for competition to influence cost-reducing effort choices. This paper explores the empirical effects of competition on technical efficiency in the context of electricity industry restructuring. Restructuring programs adopted by many U.S. states made utilities residual claimants to cost savings and increased their exposure to competitive markets. Using data on annual generating plant-level input demand, we find that municipally-owned plants, whose owners were for the most part unaffected by restructuring, experienced the smallest efficiency gains over the past decade, while investor-owned utility plants in restructured states significantly reduced their nonfuel operating expenses and employment. The analysis also highlights the substantive importance of treating the simultaneity of input and output decisions, which we do through an instrumental variables approach"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site. |
Beschreibung: | 56, 5 S. graph. Darst. |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zcb4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV023591142 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20100210 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 050106s2004 xxud||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)57409027 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV023591142 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
044 | |a xxu |c XD-US | ||
049 | |a DE-521 |a DE-19 | ||
050 | 0 | |a HB1 | |
100 | 1 | |a Markiewicz, Kira |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Does competition reduce costs? |b assessing the impact of regulatory restructuring on U.S. electric generation efficiency |c Kira Markiewicz ; Nancy Rose ; Catherine Wolfram |
264 | 1 | |a Cambridge, Mass. |b National Bureau of Economic Research |c 2004 | |
300 | |a 56, 5 S. |b graph. Darst. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series |v 11001 | |
520 | 3 | |a "Although the allocative efficiency benefits of competition are a tenet of microeconomic theory, the relation between competition and technical efficiency is less clear. Neoclassical models of profit-maximization subsume static cost-minimizing behavior regardless of market competitiveness, but traditional cost-of-service regulation may mitigate incentives for cost-minimization, and agency models of managerial behavior suggest possible scope for competition to influence cost-reducing effort choices. This paper explores the empirical effects of competition on technical efficiency in the context of electricity industry restructuring. Restructuring programs adopted by many U.S. states made utilities residual claimants to cost savings and increased their exposure to competitive markets. Using data on annual generating plant-level input demand, we find that municipally-owned plants, whose owners were for the most part unaffected by restructuring, experienced the smallest efficiency gains over the past decade, while investor-owned utility plants in restructured states significantly reduced their nonfuel operating expenses and employment. The analysis also highlights the substantive importance of treating the simultaneity of input and output decisions, which we do through an instrumental variables approach"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site. | |
650 | 4 | |a Ökonometrisches Modell | |
650 | 4 | |a Competition |x Econometric models | |
650 | 4 | |a Electric utilities |x Economic aspects |z United States | |
651 | 4 | |a USA | |
700 | 1 | |a Rose, Nancy L. |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)129715816 |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wolfram, Catherine |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)129715964 |4 aut | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |
830 | 0 | |a National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series |v 11001 |w (DE-604)BV002801238 |9 11001 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://papers.nber.org/papers/w11001.pdf |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016906472 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804138248145993728 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Markiewicz, Kira Rose, Nancy L. Wolfram, Catherine |
author_GND | (DE-588)129715816 (DE-588)129715964 |
author_facet | Markiewicz, Kira Rose, Nancy L. Wolfram, Catherine |
author_role | aut aut aut |
author_sort | Markiewicz, Kira |
author_variant | k m km n l r nl nlr c w cw |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV023591142 |
callnumber-first | H - Social Science |
callnumber-label | HB1 |
callnumber-raw | HB1 |
callnumber-search | HB1 |
callnumber-sort | HB 11 |
callnumber-subject | HB - Economic Theory and Demography |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)57409027 (DE-599)BVBBV023591142 |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02924nam a2200397zcb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV023591142</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20100210 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">050106s2004 xxud||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)57409027</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV023591142</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxu</subfield><subfield code="c">XD-US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HB1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Markiewicz, Kira</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Does competition reduce costs?</subfield><subfield code="b">assessing the impact of regulatory restructuring on U.S. electric generation efficiency</subfield><subfield code="c">Kira Markiewicz ; Nancy Rose ; Catherine Wolfram</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge, Mass.</subfield><subfield code="b">National Bureau of Economic Research</subfield><subfield code="c">2004</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">56, 5 S.</subfield><subfield code="b">graph. Darst.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series</subfield><subfield code="v">11001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Although the allocative efficiency benefits of competition are a tenet of microeconomic theory, the relation between competition and technical efficiency is less clear. Neoclassical models of profit-maximization subsume static cost-minimizing behavior regardless of market competitiveness, but traditional cost-of-service regulation may mitigate incentives for cost-minimization, and agency models of managerial behavior suggest possible scope for competition to influence cost-reducing effort choices. This paper explores the empirical effects of competition on technical efficiency in the context of electricity industry restructuring. Restructuring programs adopted by many U.S. states made utilities residual claimants to cost savings and increased their exposure to competitive markets. Using data on annual generating plant-level input demand, we find that municipally-owned plants, whose owners were for the most part unaffected by restructuring, experienced the smallest efficiency gains over the past decade, while investor-owned utility plants in restructured states significantly reduced their nonfuel operating expenses and employment. The analysis also highlights the substantive importance of treating the simultaneity of input and output decisions, which we do through an instrumental variables approach"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Ökonometrisches Modell</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Competition</subfield><subfield code="x">Econometric models</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Electric utilities</subfield><subfield code="x">Economic aspects</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Rose, Nancy L.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)129715816</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Wolfram, Catherine</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)129715964</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series</subfield><subfield code="v">11001</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV002801238</subfield><subfield code="9">11001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://papers.nber.org/papers/w11001.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016906472</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | USA |
geographic_facet | USA |
id | DE-604.BV023591142 |
illustrated | Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-02T22:41:27Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T21:25:10Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016906472 |
oclc_num | 57409027 |
open_access_boolean | 1 |
owner | DE-521 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
owner_facet | DE-521 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
physical | 56, 5 S. graph. Darst. |
publishDate | 2004 |
publishDateSearch | 2004 |
publishDateSort | 2004 |
publisher | National Bureau of Economic Research |
record_format | marc |
series | National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series |
series2 | National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series |
spelling | Markiewicz, Kira Verfasser aut Does competition reduce costs? assessing the impact of regulatory restructuring on U.S. electric generation efficiency Kira Markiewicz ; Nancy Rose ; Catherine Wolfram Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 2004 56, 5 S. graph. Darst. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series 11001 "Although the allocative efficiency benefits of competition are a tenet of microeconomic theory, the relation between competition and technical efficiency is less clear. Neoclassical models of profit-maximization subsume static cost-minimizing behavior regardless of market competitiveness, but traditional cost-of-service regulation may mitigate incentives for cost-minimization, and agency models of managerial behavior suggest possible scope for competition to influence cost-reducing effort choices. This paper explores the empirical effects of competition on technical efficiency in the context of electricity industry restructuring. Restructuring programs adopted by many U.S. states made utilities residual claimants to cost savings and increased their exposure to competitive markets. Using data on annual generating plant-level input demand, we find that municipally-owned plants, whose owners were for the most part unaffected by restructuring, experienced the smallest efficiency gains over the past decade, while investor-owned utility plants in restructured states significantly reduced their nonfuel operating expenses and employment. The analysis also highlights the substantive importance of treating the simultaneity of input and output decisions, which we do through an instrumental variables approach"--National Bureau of Economic Research web site. Ökonometrisches Modell Competition Econometric models Electric utilities Economic aspects United States USA Rose, Nancy L. Verfasser (DE-588)129715816 aut Wolfram, Catherine Verfasser (DE-588)129715964 aut Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series 11001 (DE-604)BV002801238 11001 http://papers.nber.org/papers/w11001.pdf kostenfrei Volltext |
spellingShingle | Markiewicz, Kira Rose, Nancy L. Wolfram, Catherine Does competition reduce costs? assessing the impact of regulatory restructuring on U.S. electric generation efficiency National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.>: NBER working paper series Ökonometrisches Modell Competition Econometric models Electric utilities Economic aspects United States |
title | Does competition reduce costs? assessing the impact of regulatory restructuring on U.S. electric generation efficiency |
title_auth | Does competition reduce costs? assessing the impact of regulatory restructuring on U.S. electric generation efficiency |
title_exact_search | Does competition reduce costs? assessing the impact of regulatory restructuring on U.S. electric generation efficiency |
title_exact_search_txtP | Does competition reduce costs? assessing the impact of regulatory restructuring on U.S. electric generation efficiency |
title_full | Does competition reduce costs? assessing the impact of regulatory restructuring on U.S. electric generation efficiency Kira Markiewicz ; Nancy Rose ; Catherine Wolfram |
title_fullStr | Does competition reduce costs? assessing the impact of regulatory restructuring on U.S. electric generation efficiency Kira Markiewicz ; Nancy Rose ; Catherine Wolfram |
title_full_unstemmed | Does competition reduce costs? assessing the impact of regulatory restructuring on U.S. electric generation efficiency Kira Markiewicz ; Nancy Rose ; Catherine Wolfram |
title_short | Does competition reduce costs? |
title_sort | does competition reduce costs assessing the impact of regulatory restructuring on u s electric generation efficiency |
title_sub | assessing the impact of regulatory restructuring on U.S. electric generation efficiency |
topic | Ökonometrisches Modell Competition Econometric models Electric utilities Economic aspects United States |
topic_facet | Ökonometrisches Modell Competition Econometric models Electric utilities Economic aspects United States USA |
url | http://papers.nber.org/papers/w11001.pdf |
volume_link | (DE-604)BV002801238 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT markiewiczkira doescompetitionreducecostsassessingtheimpactofregulatoryrestructuringonuselectricgenerationefficiency AT rosenancyl doescompetitionreducecostsassessingtheimpactofregulatoryrestructuringonuselectricgenerationefficiency AT wolframcatherine doescompetitionreducecostsassessingtheimpactofregulatoryrestructuringonuselectricgenerationefficiency |