How migration restrictions limit agglomeration and productivity in China:
China strongly restricts rural-rural, urban-urban, and rural-urban migration. The result which this paper documents is a surplus of labor in agriculture. However, the paper argues that these restrictions also lead to insufficient agglomeration of economic activity within both rural industrial and ur...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge, Mass.
NBER
2001
|
Schriftenreihe: | Working paper series / National Bureau of Economic Research
8707 |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | China strongly restricts rural-rural, urban-urban, and rural-urban migration. The result which this paper documents is a surplus of labor in agriculture. However, the paper argues that these restrictions also lead to insufficient agglomeration of economic activity within both rural industrial and urban areas, with resulting first order losses in GDP. For urban areas the paper estimates a city productivity relationship, based on city GDP numbers for 1990-97. The effects of access, educational attainment, FDI, and public infrastructure on productivity are estimated. Worker productivity is shown to be an inverted U-shape function of city employment level, with the peak point shifting out as industrial composition moves from manufacturing to services. As far as we know this is the first paper to actually estimate the relationship between output per worker and city scale, as it varies with industrial composition. The majority of Chinese cities are shown to be potentially undersized - below the lower bound on the 95% confidence interval about the size where their output per worker peaks. The paper calculates the large gains from increased agglomeration in both the rural industrial and urban sectors. It also examines the effect of capital reallocations, where the rural sector is grossly undercapitalized. |
Beschreibung: | 35, [17], 7 S. graph. Darst 22 cm |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zcb4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV023588818 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20080926000000.0 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 970311s2001 xxud||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)603859828 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV023588818 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
044 | |a xxu |c XD-US | ||
049 | |a DE-521 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Au, Chun-Chung |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a How migration restrictions limit agglomeration and productivity in China |c Chun-Chung Au ; Vernon Henderson |
264 | 1 | |a Cambridge, Mass. |b NBER |c 2001 | |
300 | |a 35, [17], 7 S. |b graph. Darst |c 22 cm | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a Working paper series / National Bureau of Economic Research |v 8707 | |
520 | |a China strongly restricts rural-rural, urban-urban, and rural-urban migration. The result which this paper documents is a surplus of labor in agriculture. However, the paper argues that these restrictions also lead to insufficient agglomeration of economic activity within both rural industrial and urban areas, with resulting first order losses in GDP. For urban areas the paper estimates a city productivity relationship, based on city GDP numbers for 1990-97. The effects of access, educational attainment, FDI, and public infrastructure on productivity are estimated. Worker productivity is shown to be an inverted U-shape function of city employment level, with the peak point shifting out as industrial composition moves from manufacturing to services. As far as we know this is the first paper to actually estimate the relationship between output per worker and city scale, as it varies with industrial composition. The majority of Chinese cities are shown to be potentially undersized - below the lower bound on the 95% confidence interval about the size where their output per worker peaks. The paper calculates the large gains from increased agglomeration in both the rural industrial and urban sectors. It also examines the effect of capital reallocations, where the rural sector is grossly undercapitalized. | ||
700 | 1 | |a Henderson, J. Vernon |d 1947- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)124076238 |4 aut | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |
810 | 2 | |a National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.> |t NBER working paper series |v 8707 |w (DE-604)BV002801238 |9 8707 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u http://papers.nber.org/papers/w8707.pdf |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016904150 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804138243232366592 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Au, Chun-Chung Henderson, J. Vernon 1947- |
author_GND | (DE-588)124076238 |
author_facet | Au, Chun-Chung Henderson, J. Vernon 1947- |
author_role | aut aut |
author_sort | Au, Chun-Chung |
author_variant | c c a cca j v h jv jvh |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV023588818 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)603859828 (DE-599)BVBBV023588818 |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02503nam a2200325zcb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV023588818</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20080926000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">970311s2001 xxud||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)603859828</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV023588818</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxu</subfield><subfield code="c">XD-US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Au, Chun-Chung</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">How migration restrictions limit agglomeration and productivity in China</subfield><subfield code="c">Chun-Chung Au ; Vernon Henderson</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge, Mass.</subfield><subfield code="b">NBER</subfield><subfield code="c">2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">35, [17], 7 S.</subfield><subfield code="b">graph. Darst</subfield><subfield code="c">22 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Working paper series / National Bureau of Economic Research</subfield><subfield code="v">8707</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">China strongly restricts rural-rural, urban-urban, and rural-urban migration. The result which this paper documents is a surplus of labor in agriculture. However, the paper argues that these restrictions also lead to insufficient agglomeration of economic activity within both rural industrial and urban areas, with resulting first order losses in GDP. For urban areas the paper estimates a city productivity relationship, based on city GDP numbers for 1990-97. The effects of access, educational attainment, FDI, and public infrastructure on productivity are estimated. Worker productivity is shown to be an inverted U-shape function of city employment level, with the peak point shifting out as industrial composition moves from manufacturing to services. As far as we know this is the first paper to actually estimate the relationship between output per worker and city scale, as it varies with industrial composition. The majority of Chinese cities are shown to be potentially undersized - below the lower bound on the 95% confidence interval about the size where their output per worker peaks. The paper calculates the large gains from increased agglomeration in both the rural industrial and urban sectors. It also examines the effect of capital reallocations, where the rural sector is grossly undercapitalized.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Henderson, J. Vernon</subfield><subfield code="d">1947-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)124076238</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="810" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.></subfield><subfield code="t">NBER working paper series</subfield><subfield code="v">8707</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV002801238</subfield><subfield code="9">8707</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="1"><subfield code="u">http://papers.nber.org/papers/w8707.pdf</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016904150</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV023588818 |
illustrated | Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-02T22:41:24Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T21:25:05Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016904150 |
oclc_num | 603859828 |
open_access_boolean | 1 |
owner | DE-521 |
owner_facet | DE-521 |
physical | 35, [17], 7 S. graph. Darst 22 cm |
publishDate | 2001 |
publishDateSearch | 2001 |
publishDateSort | 2001 |
publisher | NBER |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Working paper series / National Bureau of Economic Research |
spelling | Au, Chun-Chung Verfasser aut How migration restrictions limit agglomeration and productivity in China Chun-Chung Au ; Vernon Henderson Cambridge, Mass. NBER 2001 35, [17], 7 S. graph. Darst 22 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Working paper series / National Bureau of Economic Research 8707 China strongly restricts rural-rural, urban-urban, and rural-urban migration. The result which this paper documents is a surplus of labor in agriculture. However, the paper argues that these restrictions also lead to insufficient agglomeration of economic activity within both rural industrial and urban areas, with resulting first order losses in GDP. For urban areas the paper estimates a city productivity relationship, based on city GDP numbers for 1990-97. The effects of access, educational attainment, FDI, and public infrastructure on productivity are estimated. Worker productivity is shown to be an inverted U-shape function of city employment level, with the peak point shifting out as industrial composition moves from manufacturing to services. As far as we know this is the first paper to actually estimate the relationship between output per worker and city scale, as it varies with industrial composition. The majority of Chinese cities are shown to be potentially undersized - below the lower bound on the 95% confidence interval about the size where their output per worker peaks. The paper calculates the large gains from increased agglomeration in both the rural industrial and urban sectors. It also examines the effect of capital reallocations, where the rural sector is grossly undercapitalized. Henderson, J. Vernon 1947- Verfasser (DE-588)124076238 aut Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe National Bureau of Economic Research <Cambridge, Mass.> NBER working paper series 8707 (DE-604)BV002801238 8707 http://papers.nber.org/papers/w8707.pdf kostenfrei Volltext |
spellingShingle | Au, Chun-Chung Henderson, J. Vernon 1947- How migration restrictions limit agglomeration and productivity in China |
title | How migration restrictions limit agglomeration and productivity in China |
title_auth | How migration restrictions limit agglomeration and productivity in China |
title_exact_search | How migration restrictions limit agglomeration and productivity in China |
title_exact_search_txtP | How migration restrictions limit agglomeration and productivity in China |
title_full | How migration restrictions limit agglomeration and productivity in China Chun-Chung Au ; Vernon Henderson |
title_fullStr | How migration restrictions limit agglomeration and productivity in China Chun-Chung Au ; Vernon Henderson |
title_full_unstemmed | How migration restrictions limit agglomeration and productivity in China Chun-Chung Au ; Vernon Henderson |
title_short | How migration restrictions limit agglomeration and productivity in China |
title_sort | how migration restrictions limit agglomeration and productivity in china |
url | http://papers.nber.org/papers/w8707.pdf |
volume_link | (DE-604)BV002801238 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT auchunchung howmigrationrestrictionslimitagglomerationandproductivityinchina AT hendersonjvernon howmigrationrestrictionslimitagglomerationandproductivityinchina |