Implementation of the Civil Justice Reform Act in Pilot and Comparison Districts:
The Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 (CJRA) required each federal district court to develop a case management plan to reduce costs and delay. The legislation also created a pilot program to test six principles of case management, and required an independent evaluation to assess their effects. This r...
Gespeichert in:
| Format: | Buch |
|---|---|
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Santa Monica, CA
RAND
1996
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Zusammenfassung: | The Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 (CJRA) required each federal district court to develop a case management plan to reduce costs and delay. The legislation also created a pilot program to test six principles of case management, and required an independent evaluation to assess their effects. This report is one of four documents describing the evaluation, which was conducted by RAND's Institute for Civil Justice. The report traces the stages in the CJRA implementation: the recommendations of the advisory groups, the plans adopted by the districts, and the plans actually implemented. The study found that all pilot districts complied with the statutory language of the act. But the amount of change varied widely, and in some districts, planned changes were not fully implemented. However, implementing the pilot plans may have heightened the consciousness of judges and lawyers and brought about some important implicit shifts in their approach to case management. See also MR-800-ICJ, MR-802-ICJ, and MR-803-ICJ. |
| Beschreibung: | XXIII, 263 S. graph. Darst. |
| ISBN: | 9780833024558 0833024558 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV023372208 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20080814 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 080701s1996 d||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780833024558 |9 978-0-8330-2455-8 | ||
| 020 | |a 0833024558 |9 0-8330-2455-8 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)36348934 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV023372208 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-19 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a KF8754 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 353.40973 |b Im7 |2 21 | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Implementation of the Civil Justice Reform Act in Pilot and Comparison Districts |c James S. Kakalik ... |
| 264 | 1 | |a Santa Monica, CA |b RAND |c 1996 | |
| 300 | |a XXIII, 263 S. |b graph. Darst. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a The Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 (CJRA) required each federal district court to develop a case management plan to reduce costs and delay. The legislation also created a pilot program to test six principles of case management, and required an independent evaluation to assess their effects. This report is one of four documents describing the evaluation, which was conducted by RAND's Institute for Civil Justice. The report traces the stages in the CJRA implementation: the recommendations of the advisory groups, the plans adopted by the districts, and the plans actually implemented. The study found that all pilot districts complied with the statutory language of the act. But the amount of change varied widely, and in some districts, planned changes were not fully implemented. However, implementing the pilot plans may have heightened the consciousness of judges and lawyers and brought about some important implicit shifts in their approach to case management. See also MR-800-ICJ, MR-802-ICJ, and MR-803-ICJ. | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LAW / Civil Law |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Court congestion and delay |z United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a District courts |z United States |x Administration | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Justice, Administration of |z United States | |
| 651 | 4 | |a USA | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kakalik, James S. |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016555457 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804137740363628544 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV023372208 |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | KF8754 |
| callnumber-raw | KF8754 |
| callnumber-search | KF8754 |
| callnumber-sort | KF 48754 |
| callnumber-subject | KF - United States |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)36348934 (DE-599)BVBBV023372208 |
| dewey-full | 353.40973 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 353 - Specific fields of public administration |
| dewey-raw | 353.40973 |
| dewey-search | 353.40973 |
| dewey-sort | 3353.40973 |
| dewey-tens | 350 - Public administration and military science |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02141nam a2200361 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV023372208</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20080814 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">080701s1996 d||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780833024558</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-8330-2455-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0833024558</subfield><subfield code="9">0-8330-2455-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)36348934</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV023372208</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KF8754</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">353.40973</subfield><subfield code="b">Im7</subfield><subfield code="2">21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Implementation of the Civil Justice Reform Act in Pilot and Comparison Districts</subfield><subfield code="c">James S. Kakalik ...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Santa Monica, CA</subfield><subfield code="b">RAND</subfield><subfield code="c">1996</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XXIII, 263 S.</subfield><subfield code="b">graph. Darst.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 (CJRA) required each federal district court to develop a case management plan to reduce costs and delay. The legislation also created a pilot program to test six principles of case management, and required an independent evaluation to assess their effects. This report is one of four documents describing the evaluation, which was conducted by RAND's Institute for Civil Justice. The report traces the stages in the CJRA implementation: the recommendations of the advisory groups, the plans adopted by the districts, and the plans actually implemented. The study found that all pilot districts complied with the statutory language of the act. But the amount of change varied widely, and in some districts, planned changes were not fully implemented. However, implementing the pilot plans may have heightened the consciousness of judges and lawyers and brought about some important implicit shifts in their approach to case management. See also MR-800-ICJ, MR-802-ICJ, and MR-803-ICJ.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LAW / Civil Law</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Court congestion and delay</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">District courts</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="x">Administration</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Justice, Administration of</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kakalik, James S.</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016555457</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | USA |
| geographic_facet | USA |
| id | DE-604.BV023372208 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-02T21:13:03Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T21:17:06Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780833024558 0833024558 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016555457 |
| oclc_num | 36348934 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| owner_facet | DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| physical | XXIII, 263 S. graph. Darst. |
| publishDate | 1996 |
| publishDateSearch | 1996 |
| publishDateSort | 1996 |
| publisher | RAND |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Implementation of the Civil Justice Reform Act in Pilot and Comparison Districts James S. Kakalik ... Santa Monica, CA RAND 1996 XXIII, 263 S. graph. Darst. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier The Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 (CJRA) required each federal district court to develop a case management plan to reduce costs and delay. The legislation also created a pilot program to test six principles of case management, and required an independent evaluation to assess their effects. This report is one of four documents describing the evaluation, which was conducted by RAND's Institute for Civil Justice. The report traces the stages in the CJRA implementation: the recommendations of the advisory groups, the plans adopted by the districts, and the plans actually implemented. The study found that all pilot districts complied with the statutory language of the act. But the amount of change varied widely, and in some districts, planned changes were not fully implemented. However, implementing the pilot plans may have heightened the consciousness of judges and lawyers and brought about some important implicit shifts in their approach to case management. See also MR-800-ICJ, MR-802-ICJ, and MR-803-ICJ. LAW / Civil Law bisacsh Court congestion and delay United States District courts United States Administration Justice, Administration of United States USA Kakalik, James S. Sonstige oth |
| spellingShingle | Implementation of the Civil Justice Reform Act in Pilot and Comparison Districts LAW / Civil Law bisacsh Court congestion and delay United States District courts United States Administration Justice, Administration of United States |
| title | Implementation of the Civil Justice Reform Act in Pilot and Comparison Districts |
| title_auth | Implementation of the Civil Justice Reform Act in Pilot and Comparison Districts |
| title_exact_search | Implementation of the Civil Justice Reform Act in Pilot and Comparison Districts |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Implementation of the Civil Justice Reform Act in Pilot and Comparison Districts |
| title_full | Implementation of the Civil Justice Reform Act in Pilot and Comparison Districts James S. Kakalik ... |
| title_fullStr | Implementation of the Civil Justice Reform Act in Pilot and Comparison Districts James S. Kakalik ... |
| title_full_unstemmed | Implementation of the Civil Justice Reform Act in Pilot and Comparison Districts James S. Kakalik ... |
| title_short | Implementation of the Civil Justice Reform Act in Pilot and Comparison Districts |
| title_sort | implementation of the civil justice reform act in pilot and comparison districts |
| topic | LAW / Civil Law bisacsh Court congestion and delay United States District courts United States Administration Justice, Administration of United States |
| topic_facet | LAW / Civil Law Court congestion and delay United States District courts United States Administration Justice, Administration of United States USA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kakalikjamess implementationoftheciviljusticereformactinpilotandcomparisondistricts |