Is there a right to remain silent?: coercive interrogation and the Fifth Amendment after 9/11
From the Publisher: The right to remain silent, guaranteed by the famed Fifth Amendment case, Miranda v. Arizona, is perhaps one of the most easily recognized and oft-quoted constitutional rights in American culture. Yet despite its ubiquity, there is widespread misunderstanding about the right and...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Oxford [u.a.]
Oxford Univ. Press
2008
|
Schriftenreihe: | Inalienable rights series
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Zusammenfassung: | From the Publisher: The right to remain silent, guaranteed by the famed Fifth Amendment case, Miranda v. Arizona, is perhaps one of the most easily recognized and oft-quoted constitutional rights in American culture. Yet despite its ubiquity, there is widespread misunderstanding about the right and the protections promised under the Fifth Amendment. In Is There a Right to Remain Silent? renowned legal scholar and bestselling author Alan Dershowitz reveals precisely why our Fifth Amendment rights matter and how they are being reshaped, limited, and in some cases revoked in the wake of 9/11. As security concerns have heightened, law enforcement has increasingly turned its attention from punishing to preventing crime Dershowitz argues that recent Supreme Court decisions have opened the door to coercive interrogations-even when they amount to torture-if they are undertaken to prevent a crime, especially a terrorist attack, and so long as the fruits of such interrogations are not introduced into evidence at the criminal trial of the coerced person. In effect, the court has given a green light to all preventive interrogation methods. By deftly tracing the evolution of the Fifth Amendment from its inception in the Bill of Rights to the present day, where national security is the nation's first priority, Dershowitz puts forward a bold reinterpretation of the Fifth Amendment for the post-9/11 world. As the world we live in changes from a "deterrent state" to the heightened vigilance of today's "preventative state," our construction, he argues, must also change We must develop a jurisprudence that will contain both substantive and procedural rules for all actions taken by government officials in order to prevent harmful conduct-including terrorism. Timely, provocative, and incisively written, Is There a Right to Remain Silent? presents an absorbing look at one of our most essential constitutional rights at one of the most critical moments in recent American history |
Beschreibung: | Includes bibliographical references (p. [177]-204) and index What is the right against self-incrimination? -- The Supreme Court's recent decision -- The limits of textual analysis in constitutional interpretation -- The limits of precedent: which way does the "immunity" analogy cut? -- The limits of historical inquiry -- The privilege over time -- The relevance of constitutional policies underlying the right -- A matter of interpretation -- Conclusion: The case for a vibrant privilege in the preventive state |
Beschreibung: | xx, 212 p. |
ISBN: | 9780195307795 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV023328850 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20081014 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 080604s2008 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 9780195307795 |9 978-0-19-530779-5 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)176861326 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV023328850 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-188 | ||
050 | 0 | |a KF9668 | |
082 | 0 | |a 345.73056 | |
082 | 0 | |a 345.73/056 |2 22 | |
100 | 1 | |a Dershowitz, Alan M. |d 1938- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)119065959 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Is there a right to remain silent? |b coercive interrogation and the Fifth Amendment after 9/11 |c Alan M. Dershowitz |
264 | 1 | |a Oxford [u.a.] |b Oxford Univ. Press |c 2008 | |
300 | |a xx, 212 p. | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a Inalienable rights series | |
500 | |a Includes bibliographical references (p. [177]-204) and index | ||
500 | |a What is the right against self-incrimination? -- The Supreme Court's recent decision -- The limits of textual analysis in constitutional interpretation -- The limits of precedent: which way does the "immunity" analogy cut? -- The limits of historical inquiry -- The privilege over time -- The relevance of constitutional policies underlying the right -- A matter of interpretation -- Conclusion: The case for a vibrant privilege in the preventive state | ||
520 | 3 | |a From the Publisher: The right to remain silent, guaranteed by the famed Fifth Amendment case, Miranda v. Arizona, is perhaps one of the most easily recognized and oft-quoted constitutional rights in American culture. Yet despite its ubiquity, there is widespread misunderstanding about the right and the protections promised under the Fifth Amendment. In Is There a Right to Remain Silent? renowned legal scholar and bestselling author Alan Dershowitz reveals precisely why our Fifth Amendment rights matter and how they are being reshaped, limited, and in some cases revoked in the wake of 9/11. As security concerns have heightened, law enforcement has increasingly turned its attention from punishing to preventing crime | |
520 | 3 | |a Dershowitz argues that recent Supreme Court decisions have opened the door to coercive interrogations-even when they amount to torture-if they are undertaken to prevent a crime, especially a terrorist attack, and so long as the fruits of such interrogations are not introduced into evidence at the criminal trial of the coerced person. In effect, the court has given a green light to all preventive interrogation methods. By deftly tracing the evolution of the Fifth Amendment from its inception in the Bill of Rights to the present day, where national security is the nation's first priority, Dershowitz puts forward a bold reinterpretation of the Fifth Amendment for the post-9/11 world. As the world we live in changes from a "deterrent state" to the heightened vigilance of today's "preventative state," our construction, he argues, must also change | |
520 | 3 | |a We must develop a jurisprudence that will contain both substantive and procedural rules for all actions taken by government officials in order to prevent harmful conduct-including terrorism. Timely, provocative, and incisively written, Is There a Right to Remain Silent? presents an absorbing look at one of our most essential constitutional rights at one of the most critical moments in recent American history | |
610 | 1 | 4 | |a United States / Constitution / 5th Amendment |
610 | 1 | 4 | |a United States / Supreme Court |
610 | 2 | 4 | |a United States. |b Supreme Court |
610 | 2 | 4 | |a United States. |t Constitution |n 5th Amendment |
650 | 4 | |a Self-incrimination / United States | |
650 | 4 | |a Right to counsel / United States | |
650 | 4 | |a Police questioning / United States | |
650 | 4 | |a Civil rights / United States | |
650 | 7 | |a Grondrechten |2 gtt | |
650 | 7 | |a Verhoor (recht) |2 gtt | |
650 | 7 | |a Zwijgrecht |2 gtt | |
650 | 4 | |a Civil rights |z United States | |
650 | 4 | |a Police questioning |z United States | |
650 | 4 | |a Right to counsel |z United States | |
650 | 4 | |a Self-incrimination |z United States | |
651 | 7 | |a Verenigde Staten |2 gtt | |
651 | 4 | |a USA | |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m GBV Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016512808&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016512808 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804137671188021248 |
---|---|
adam_text | IS THERE A RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT? COERCIVE INTERROGATION AND THE FIFTH
AMENDMENT AFTER 9/1 I ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ OXTORD UNIVERSITY PRESS 2008
CONTENTS SERIES EDITOR S NOTE VAE INTRODUCTION XI CHAPTER ONE WHAT IS THE
RIGHT AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION? 3 CHAPTER TWO THE SUPREME COURT S
RECENT DECISION II CHAPTER THREE THE LIMITS OF TEXTUAL ANALYSIS IN
CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION 25 CONTENTS CHAPTER FOUR THE LIMITS OF
PRECEDENT: WHICH WAY DOES THE IMMUNITY ANALOGY CUT? 40 CHAPTER FIVE
THE LIMITS OF HISTORICAL INQUIRY 54 CHAPTER SIX THE PRIVILEGE OVER TIME
93 CHAPTER S EVEN THE RELEVANCE OF CONSTITUTIONAL POLICIES UNDERLYING
THE RIGHT 117 CHAPTER EIGHT A MATTER OF INTERPRETATION 126 CONCLUSION
THE CASE FOR A VIBRANT PRIVILEGE IN THE PREVENTIVE STATE 137 NOTES 177
INDEX 205 XLL
|
adam_txt |
IS THERE A RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT? COERCIVE INTERROGATION AND THE FIFTH
AMENDMENT AFTER 9/1 I ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ OXTORD UNIVERSITY PRESS 2008
CONTENTS SERIES EDITOR'S NOTE VAE INTRODUCTION XI CHAPTER ONE WHAT IS THE
RIGHT AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION? 3 CHAPTER TWO THE SUPREME COURT'S
RECENT DECISION II CHAPTER THREE THE LIMITS OF TEXTUAL ANALYSIS IN
CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION 25 CONTENTS CHAPTER FOUR THE LIMITS OF
PRECEDENT: WHICH WAY DOES THE "IMMUNITY" ANALOGY CUT? 40 CHAPTER FIVE
THE LIMITS OF HISTORICAL INQUIRY 54 CHAPTER SIX THE PRIVILEGE OVER TIME
93 CHAPTER S EVEN THE RELEVANCE OF CONSTITUTIONAL POLICIES UNDERLYING
THE RIGHT 117 CHAPTER EIGHT A MATTER OF INTERPRETATION 126 CONCLUSION
THE CASE FOR A VIBRANT PRIVILEGE IN THE PREVENTIVE STATE 137 NOTES 177
INDEX 205 XLL |
any_adam_object | 1 |
any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
author | Dershowitz, Alan M. 1938- |
author_GND | (DE-588)119065959 |
author_facet | Dershowitz, Alan M. 1938- |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Dershowitz, Alan M. 1938- |
author_variant | a m d am amd |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV023328850 |
callnumber-first | K - Law |
callnumber-label | KF9668 |
callnumber-raw | KF9668 |
callnumber-search | KF9668 |
callnumber-sort | KF 49668 |
callnumber-subject | KF - United States |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)176861326 (DE-599)BVBBV023328850 |
dewey-full | 345.73056 345.73/056 |
dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
dewey-ones | 345 - Criminal law |
dewey-raw | 345.73056 345.73/056 |
dewey-search | 345.73056 345.73/056 |
dewey-sort | 3345.73056 |
dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04521nam a2200577 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV023328850</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20081014 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">080604s2008 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780195307795</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-19-530779-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)176861326</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV023328850</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">KF9668</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">345.73056</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">345.73/056</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dershowitz, Alan M.</subfield><subfield code="d">1938-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)119065959</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Is there a right to remain silent?</subfield><subfield code="b">coercive interrogation and the Fifth Amendment after 9/11</subfield><subfield code="c">Alan M. Dershowitz</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Oxford Univ. Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xx, 212 p.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Inalienable rights series</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references (p. [177]-204) and index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">What is the right against self-incrimination? -- The Supreme Court's recent decision -- The limits of textual analysis in constitutional interpretation -- The limits of precedent: which way does the "immunity" analogy cut? -- The limits of historical inquiry -- The privilege over time -- The relevance of constitutional policies underlying the right -- A matter of interpretation -- Conclusion: The case for a vibrant privilege in the preventive state</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">From the Publisher: The right to remain silent, guaranteed by the famed Fifth Amendment case, Miranda v. Arizona, is perhaps one of the most easily recognized and oft-quoted constitutional rights in American culture. Yet despite its ubiquity, there is widespread misunderstanding about the right and the protections promised under the Fifth Amendment. In Is There a Right to Remain Silent? renowned legal scholar and bestselling author Alan Dershowitz reveals precisely why our Fifth Amendment rights matter and how they are being reshaped, limited, and in some cases revoked in the wake of 9/11. As security concerns have heightened, law enforcement has increasingly turned its attention from punishing to preventing crime</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a"> Dershowitz argues that recent Supreme Court decisions have opened the door to coercive interrogations-even when they amount to torture-if they are undertaken to prevent a crime, especially a terrorist attack, and so long as the fruits of such interrogations are not introduced into evidence at the criminal trial of the coerced person. In effect, the court has given a green light to all preventive interrogation methods. By deftly tracing the evolution of the Fifth Amendment from its inception in the Bill of Rights to the present day, where national security is the nation's first priority, Dershowitz puts forward a bold reinterpretation of the Fifth Amendment for the post-9/11 world. As the world we live in changes from a "deterrent state" to the heightened vigilance of today's "preventative state," our construction, he argues, must also change</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a"> We must develop a jurisprudence that will contain both substantive and procedural rules for all actions taken by government officials in order to prevent harmful conduct-including terrorism. Timely, provocative, and incisively written, Is There a Right to Remain Silent? presents an absorbing look at one of our most essential constitutional rights at one of the most critical moments in recent American history</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States / Constitution / 5th Amendment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="1" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States / Supreme Court</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States.</subfield><subfield code="b">Supreme Court</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="610" ind1="2" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States.</subfield><subfield code="t">Constitution</subfield><subfield code="n">5th Amendment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Self-incrimination / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Right to counsel / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Police questioning / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Civil rights / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Grondrechten</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Verhoor (recht)</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Zwijgrecht</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Civil rights</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Police questioning</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Right to counsel</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Self-incrimination</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Verenigde Staten</subfield><subfield code="2">gtt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">GBV Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016512808&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016512808</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | Verenigde Staten gtt USA |
geographic_facet | Verenigde Staten USA |
id | DE-604.BV023328850 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-02T20:56:47Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-09T21:16:00Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9780195307795 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016512808 |
oclc_num | 176861326 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 DE-188 |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-188 |
physical | xx, 212 p. |
publishDate | 2008 |
publishDateSearch | 2008 |
publishDateSort | 2008 |
publisher | Oxford Univ. Press |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Inalienable rights series |
spelling | Dershowitz, Alan M. 1938- Verfasser (DE-588)119065959 aut Is there a right to remain silent? coercive interrogation and the Fifth Amendment after 9/11 Alan M. Dershowitz Oxford [u.a.] Oxford Univ. Press 2008 xx, 212 p. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Inalienable rights series Includes bibliographical references (p. [177]-204) and index What is the right against self-incrimination? -- The Supreme Court's recent decision -- The limits of textual analysis in constitutional interpretation -- The limits of precedent: which way does the "immunity" analogy cut? -- The limits of historical inquiry -- The privilege over time -- The relevance of constitutional policies underlying the right -- A matter of interpretation -- Conclusion: The case for a vibrant privilege in the preventive state From the Publisher: The right to remain silent, guaranteed by the famed Fifth Amendment case, Miranda v. Arizona, is perhaps one of the most easily recognized and oft-quoted constitutional rights in American culture. Yet despite its ubiquity, there is widespread misunderstanding about the right and the protections promised under the Fifth Amendment. In Is There a Right to Remain Silent? renowned legal scholar and bestselling author Alan Dershowitz reveals precisely why our Fifth Amendment rights matter and how they are being reshaped, limited, and in some cases revoked in the wake of 9/11. As security concerns have heightened, law enforcement has increasingly turned its attention from punishing to preventing crime Dershowitz argues that recent Supreme Court decisions have opened the door to coercive interrogations-even when they amount to torture-if they are undertaken to prevent a crime, especially a terrorist attack, and so long as the fruits of such interrogations are not introduced into evidence at the criminal trial of the coerced person. In effect, the court has given a green light to all preventive interrogation methods. By deftly tracing the evolution of the Fifth Amendment from its inception in the Bill of Rights to the present day, where national security is the nation's first priority, Dershowitz puts forward a bold reinterpretation of the Fifth Amendment for the post-9/11 world. As the world we live in changes from a "deterrent state" to the heightened vigilance of today's "preventative state," our construction, he argues, must also change We must develop a jurisprudence that will contain both substantive and procedural rules for all actions taken by government officials in order to prevent harmful conduct-including terrorism. Timely, provocative, and incisively written, Is There a Right to Remain Silent? presents an absorbing look at one of our most essential constitutional rights at one of the most critical moments in recent American history United States / Constitution / 5th Amendment United States / Supreme Court United States. Supreme Court United States. Constitution 5th Amendment Self-incrimination / United States Right to counsel / United States Police questioning / United States Civil rights / United States Grondrechten gtt Verhoor (recht) gtt Zwijgrecht gtt Civil rights United States Police questioning United States Right to counsel United States Self-incrimination United States Verenigde Staten gtt USA GBV Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016512808&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
spellingShingle | Dershowitz, Alan M. 1938- Is there a right to remain silent? coercive interrogation and the Fifth Amendment after 9/11 United States / Constitution / 5th Amendment United States / Supreme Court United States. Supreme Court United States. Constitution 5th Amendment Self-incrimination / United States Right to counsel / United States Police questioning / United States Civil rights / United States Grondrechten gtt Verhoor (recht) gtt Zwijgrecht gtt Civil rights United States Police questioning United States Right to counsel United States Self-incrimination United States |
title | Is there a right to remain silent? coercive interrogation and the Fifth Amendment after 9/11 |
title_auth | Is there a right to remain silent? coercive interrogation and the Fifth Amendment after 9/11 |
title_exact_search | Is there a right to remain silent? coercive interrogation and the Fifth Amendment after 9/11 |
title_exact_search_txtP | Is there a right to remain silent? coercive interrogation and the Fifth Amendment after 9/11 |
title_full | Is there a right to remain silent? coercive interrogation and the Fifth Amendment after 9/11 Alan M. Dershowitz |
title_fullStr | Is there a right to remain silent? coercive interrogation and the Fifth Amendment after 9/11 Alan M. Dershowitz |
title_full_unstemmed | Is there a right to remain silent? coercive interrogation and the Fifth Amendment after 9/11 Alan M. Dershowitz |
title_short | Is there a right to remain silent? |
title_sort | is there a right to remain silent coercive interrogation and the fifth amendment after 9 11 |
title_sub | coercive interrogation and the Fifth Amendment after 9/11 |
topic | United States / Constitution / 5th Amendment United States / Supreme Court United States. Supreme Court United States. Constitution 5th Amendment Self-incrimination / United States Right to counsel / United States Police questioning / United States Civil rights / United States Grondrechten gtt Verhoor (recht) gtt Zwijgrecht gtt Civil rights United States Police questioning United States Right to counsel United States Self-incrimination United States |
topic_facet | United States / Constitution / 5th Amendment United States / Supreme Court United States. Supreme Court United States. Constitution 5th Amendment Self-incrimination / United States Right to counsel / United States Police questioning / United States Civil rights / United States Grondrechten Verhoor (recht) Zwijgrecht Civil rights United States Police questioning United States Right to counsel United States Self-incrimination United States Verenigde Staten USA |
url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016512808&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dershowitzalanm istherearighttoremainsilentcoerciveinterrogationandthefifthamendmentafter911 |