Retroactivity and the common law:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Oxford [u.a.]
Hart
2008
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | Based on the doctoral thesis written by Ben Juratowitch while an Australian Rhodes Scholar at the University of Oxford Includes bibliographical references (p. [227]-231) and index |
| Beschreibung: | XXIX, 239 S. 24 cm |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV023320262 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20081103 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 080529s2008 m||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |z 9781841137612 |9 9781841137612 | ||
| 020 | |z 1841137618 |9 1841137618 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)181137128 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV023320262 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a K566 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 340.57 |2 22 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Juratowitch, Ben |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Retroactivity and the common law |c Ben Juratowitch |
| 264 | 1 | |a Oxford [u.a.] |b Hart |c 2008 | |
| 300 | |a XXIX, 239 S. |c 24 cm | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Based on the doctoral thesis written by Ben Juratowitch while an Australian Rhodes Scholar at the University of Oxford | ||
| 500 | |a Includes bibliographical references (p. [227]-231) and index | ||
| 648 | 7 | |a Geschichte |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Retroactive laws | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Common law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Rétroactivité des lois | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Common law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Retroactive judicial decisions | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Retroactive laws | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Gerichtsentscheidung |0 (DE-588)4138783-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Common law |0 (DE-588)4130774-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rückwirkung von Gesetzen |0 (DE-588)4128179-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4113937-9 |a Hochschulschrift |2 gnd-content | |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4135952-5 |a Quelle |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Common law |0 (DE-588)4130774-4 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Rückwirkung von Gesetzen |0 (DE-588)4128179-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a Gerichtsentscheidung |0 (DE-588)4138783-1 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Geschichte |A z |
| 689 | 0 | |C b |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m GBV Datenaustausch |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016504370&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016504370 | ||
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 340.09 |e 22/bsb |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804137658493960192 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | RETROACTIVITY AND THE COMMON LAW BEN JURATOWITCH *HART- PUBLISHING
OXFORD AND PORTLAND, OREGON 2008 CONTENTS FOREWORD V ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
VII TABLE OF CASES XIII TABLE OF LEGISLATION AND INTERNATIONAL
INSTRUMENTS XXV INTRODUCTION 1 1 CONCEPTS, LABELS AND LIMITATIONS 5 A
INTRODUCTION 5 B RETROACTIVITY 6 C RETROSPECTIVITY 9 D CONFUSING USAGE
12 E PROBLEMATIC USAGE 13 1 WALDRON ON CRIMINAL SENTENCING 13 2 FULLER
ON TAX LIABILITY 16 F THE SCOPE OF THIS BOOK 17 G ILLUSTRATIONS OF
CONCEPTUAL DISTINCTIONS 17 1 CASES RELATING TO CONTRACTUAL RIGHTS 18 2
CASES RELATING TO PERSONAL STATUS 21 H CONCLUSION 25 2 HISTORICAL REVIEW
27 A INTRODUCTION 27 B GENERAL HISTORY AND STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION 27 C
ADJUDICATIVE RETROACTIVITY 35 D CONCLUSION 42 3 RATIONALES FOR A GENERAL
PRESUMPTION AGAINST RETROACTIVITY 43 A INTRODUCTION 43 B CERTAINTY 44 1
THE MEANING OF CERTAINTY 44 2 CERTAINTY AND RELIANCE 44 (A) THE CASE FOR
ACTUAL RELIANCE 44 (B) EVALUATION OF THE ROLE OF ACTUAL RELIANCE 45 (C)
CERTAINTY AND THE ABILITY TO RELY ON THE LAW 47 3 CERTAINTY AND AUTONOMY
48 X CONTENTS C NEGATIVE LIBERTY 50 1 NEGATIVE LIBERTY GENERALLY 50 2
DEPRIVATION OF SECURITY RELATING TO PAST EVENTS 50 3 REMOVAL OF AN
ACTUAL FREEDOM 51 4 NEGATIVE LIBERTY AND CRIMINAL LAW 52 (A) NULLUM
CRIMEN SINE LEGE ANTEA EXSTANTI 52 (B) NULLA POENA SINE LEGE ANTEA
EXSTANTI 52 D FAIR WARNING 57 E DEFEASIBILITY 60 1 INTRODUCTION TO
DEFEASIBILITY 60 2 A GENERAL PRINCIPLE OF FAIRNESS 61 3 WHERE
UNCERTAINTY IS INEVITABLE 62 4 THE EXCEPTIONAL NATURE OF RETROACTIVITY
63 F CONCLUSION 65 4 THE PRESUMPTION AGAINST RETROACTIVITY IN STATUTORY
CONSTRUCTION 67 A INTRODUCTION 67 B THE NATURE OF THE PRESUMPTION
AGAINST RETROACTIVITY 68 C APPLICATIONS OF THE PRESUMPTION AGAINST
RETROACTIVITY 71 D FAIRNESS AS A DETERMINANT OF THE APPLICABILITY OF THE
PRESUMPTION 76 E A PRESUMPTION OF VARIABLE STRENGTH? 79 F REBUTTAL OF
THE PRESUMPTION AGAINST RETROACTIVITY 80 1 EXPRESS WORDS OR NECESSARY
INTENDMENT 80 2 VALIDATING STATUTES 81 3 IMPORTANCE OF SUBJECT MATTER 86
G DETAILED STUDIES 91 1 THE INTERTEMPORAL EFFECT OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT
1998 (UK) 91 (A) WAS RETROACTIVITY IN ISSUE? 91 (B) TREATMENT OF THE
PRESUMPTION AGAINST RETROACTIVITY 93 (C) APPLICABILITY OF THE
PRESUMPTION AGAINST RETROACTIVITY 94 (D) FAIRNESS AND A PRESUMPTION OF
VARIABLE STRENGTH 96 (E) STATUTORY LANGUAGE 101 2 RETROACTIVE SENTENCING
102 (A) ARTICLE 7 OF THE ECHR AND THE COMMON LAW PRESUMPTION AGAINST
RETROACTIVITY 102 (B) THE COMMON LAW PRESUMPTION AGAINST RETROACTIVE
SENTENCING 112 (C) RETROACTIVE CHANGES IN FAVOUR OF THE DEFENDANT 115 H
CONCLUSION 118 5 ADJUDICATIVE RETROACTIVITY 119 A INTRODUCTORY MATTERS
119 1 WHAT IS ADJUDICATIVE RETROACTIVITY? 119 2 THE DECLARATORY THEORY
119 3 THE SCOPE OF THIS CHAPTER 121 CONTENTS XI B THE DOCTRINE OF
PRECEDENT AND JUDICIAL ATTACHMENT TO EXISTING PRINCIPLE IN NOVEL CASES
125 C THE MARITAL RAPE CASES 127 1 OUTLINE OF THE FACTS, DECISIONS AND
ISSUES 127 2 FORESEEABILITY OF LEGAL CHANGE 130 3 HEINOUS CONDUCT 133 4
CHANGED STATUS OF WOMEN 136 5 AN ILLOGICAL IMMUNITY 136 6 CONCLUSIONS ON
THE MARITAL RAPE CASES 137 D RESTITUTION OF MONEY PAID UNDER A MISTAKE
OF LAW 138 1 THE FACTS AND ISSUES IN KLEINWORT BENSON V LINCOLN COUNTY
COUNCIL 138 2 REASONS FOR RETROACTIVITY 142 E PRIVATE LAW 143 1 THE
CREATION OF NEW LAW WITHOUT OVERRULING PRIOR AUTHORITY 144 (A) EXISTING
AUTHORITIES IN DISARRAY MAKING A DEGREE OF RETROACTIVITY INEVITABLE 144
(B) ABILITY TO RELY ON THE LAW NOT IN ISSUE 145 (C) GRADUAL DEVELOPMENT
OF NEW LAW 146 (D) MORAL OBLOQUY 150 (E) USE OF OBITER DICTA TO SIGNAL A
CHANGE IN THE LAW 151 2 THE CREATION OFNEW LAW BY OVERRULING A PRIOR
AUTHORITY 153 (A) ABILITY TO RELY ON THE LAW NOT IN ISSUE 153 (B) PRIOR
AUTHORITY WRONG IN PRINCIPLE 154 (C) RESPONSE TO CHANGED LEGAL
CIRCUMSTANCES 159 (D) RESPONSE TO CHANGED FACTUAL CIRCUMSTANCES 161 (E)
ABSENCE OF EFFECT ON LITIGANTS BEFORE THE COURT 163 (F) REFUSAL TO
OVERRULE A DECISION BECAUSE OF POTENTIAL RETROACTIVE EFFECTS 165 3
OVERRULING A PRIOR JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION OF A STATUTE 166 4
CONCLUSIONS ON PRIVATE LAW 171 F PUBLIC LAW 172 1 THE CREATION OF NEW
LAW WITHOUT OVERRULING PRIOR AUTHORITY 172 2 THE CREATION OF NEW LAW BY
OVERRULING PRIOR AUTHORITY 175 (A) JUDICIAL REVIEW OF QUESTIONS OF LAW
175 (B) JUDICIAL REVIEW OF QUESTIONS OF FACT 177 3 OVERRULING A PRIOR
JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION OF A STATUTE 178 4 CONCLUSIONS ON PUBLIC LAW 182
G CRIMINAL LAW 183 1 THE CREATION OF NEW LAW WITHOUT OVERRULING PRIOR
AUTHORITY 184 (A) JUDICIAL RESPONSE TO NEW FACTUAL CIRCUMSTANCES 184 (B)
PERCEIVED IMMORALITY 185 2 THE CREATION OF NEW LAW BY OVERRULING PRIOR
AUTHORITY 189 (A) PRIOR AUTHORITY WRONG IN PRINCIPLE 189 (B)
RETROACTIVITY IN FAVOUR OF A DEFENDANT 192 XII CONTENTS 3 OVERRULING A
PRIOR JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION OF A STATUTE 193 4 CONCLUSIONS ON CRIMINAL
LAW 196 H OVERRULING AND THE AGE OF A DECISION 197 6 PROSPECTIVE
OVERRULING 199 A WHAT IS PROSPECTIVE OVERRULING? 199 B THE STATUS QUO
200 1 ENGLAND 200 2 AUSTRALIA 204 3 NEW ZEALAND 205 4 CANADA 205 C
EVALUATION OF PROSPECTIVE OVERRULING 209 1 INCONSISTENCY WITH THE PROPER
SCOPE OF THE JUDICIAL FUNCTION IN COMMON LAW SYSTEMS 209 2 ARBITRARINESS
212 3 PROSPECTIVE OVERRRULING OF DECISIONS ABOUT STATUTORY AND
CONSTITUTIONAL CONSTRUCTION 214 D CONCLUSION 215 7 CONCLUSIONS 219 A
FOUNDATIONS 219 B COMPARISON OF CASES OF STATUTORY AND ADJUDICATIVE
RETROACTIVITY 220 C APPROACHING REBUTTAL OF THE PRESUMPTION 223 D
LEGISLATIVE AND JUDICIAL PROCESSES 224 E FINAL OBSERVATIONS 225
BIBLIOGRAPHY 227 INDEX 233
|
| adam_txt |
RETROACTIVITY AND THE COMMON LAW BEN JURATOWITCH *HART- PUBLISHING
OXFORD AND PORTLAND, OREGON 2008 CONTENTS FOREWORD V ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
VII TABLE OF CASES XIII TABLE OF LEGISLATION AND INTERNATIONAL
INSTRUMENTS XXV INTRODUCTION 1 1 CONCEPTS, LABELS AND LIMITATIONS 5 A
INTRODUCTION 5 B RETROACTIVITY 6 C RETROSPECTIVITY 9 D CONFUSING USAGE
12 E PROBLEMATIC USAGE 13 1 WALDRON ON CRIMINAL SENTENCING 13 2 FULLER
ON TAX LIABILITY 16 F THE SCOPE OF THIS BOOK 17 G ILLUSTRATIONS OF
CONCEPTUAL DISTINCTIONS 17 1 CASES RELATING TO CONTRACTUAL RIGHTS 18 2
CASES RELATING TO PERSONAL STATUS 21 H CONCLUSION 25 2 HISTORICAL REVIEW
27 A INTRODUCTION 27 B GENERAL HISTORY AND STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION 27 C
ADJUDICATIVE RETROACTIVITY 35 D CONCLUSION 42 3 RATIONALES FOR A GENERAL
PRESUMPTION AGAINST RETROACTIVITY 43 A INTRODUCTION 43 B CERTAINTY 44 1
THE MEANING OF CERTAINTY 44 2 CERTAINTY AND RELIANCE 44 (A) THE CASE FOR
ACTUAL RELIANCE 44 (B) EVALUATION OF THE ROLE OF ACTUAL RELIANCE 45 (C)
CERTAINTY AND THE ABILITY TO RELY ON THE LAW 47 3 CERTAINTY AND AUTONOMY
48 X CONTENTS C NEGATIVE LIBERTY 50 1 NEGATIVE LIBERTY GENERALLY 50 2
DEPRIVATION OF SECURITY RELATING TO PAST EVENTS 50 3 REMOVAL OF AN
ACTUAL FREEDOM 51 4 NEGATIVE LIBERTY AND CRIMINAL LAW 52 (A) NULLUM
CRIMEN SINE LEGE ANTEA EXSTANTI 52 (B) NULLA POENA SINE LEGE ANTEA
EXSTANTI 52 D FAIR WARNING 57 E DEFEASIBILITY 60 1 INTRODUCTION TO
DEFEASIBILITY 60 2 A GENERAL PRINCIPLE OF FAIRNESS 61 3 WHERE
UNCERTAINTY IS INEVITABLE 62 4 THE EXCEPTIONAL NATURE OF RETROACTIVITY
63 F CONCLUSION 65 4 THE PRESUMPTION AGAINST RETROACTIVITY IN STATUTORY
CONSTRUCTION 67 A INTRODUCTION 67 B THE NATURE OF THE PRESUMPTION
AGAINST RETROACTIVITY 68 C APPLICATIONS OF THE PRESUMPTION AGAINST
RETROACTIVITY 71 D FAIRNESS AS A DETERMINANT OF THE APPLICABILITY OF THE
PRESUMPTION 76 E A PRESUMPTION OF VARIABLE STRENGTH? 79 F REBUTTAL OF
THE PRESUMPTION AGAINST RETROACTIVITY 80 1 EXPRESS WORDS OR NECESSARY
INTENDMENT 80 2 VALIDATING STATUTES 81 3 IMPORTANCE OF SUBJECT MATTER 86
G DETAILED STUDIES 91 1 THE INTERTEMPORAL EFFECT OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT
1998 (UK) 91 (A) WAS RETROACTIVITY IN ISSUE? 91 (B) TREATMENT OF THE
PRESUMPTION AGAINST RETROACTIVITY 93 (C) APPLICABILITY OF THE
PRESUMPTION AGAINST RETROACTIVITY 94 (D) FAIRNESS AND A PRESUMPTION OF
VARIABLE STRENGTH 96 (E) STATUTORY LANGUAGE 101 2 RETROACTIVE SENTENCING
102 (A) ARTICLE 7 OF THE ECHR AND THE COMMON LAW PRESUMPTION AGAINST
RETROACTIVITY 102 (B) THE COMMON LAW PRESUMPTION AGAINST RETROACTIVE
SENTENCING 112 (C) RETROACTIVE CHANGES IN FAVOUR OF THE DEFENDANT 115 H
CONCLUSION 118 5 ADJUDICATIVE RETROACTIVITY 119 A INTRODUCTORY MATTERS
119 1 WHAT IS ADJUDICATIVE RETROACTIVITY? 119 2 THE DECLARATORY THEORY
119 3 THE SCOPE OF THIS CHAPTER 121 CONTENTS XI B THE DOCTRINE OF
PRECEDENT AND JUDICIAL ATTACHMENT TO EXISTING PRINCIPLE IN NOVEL CASES
125 C THE MARITAL RAPE CASES 127 1 OUTLINE OF THE FACTS, DECISIONS AND
ISSUES 127 2 FORESEEABILITY OF LEGAL CHANGE 130 3 HEINOUS CONDUCT 133 4
CHANGED STATUS OF WOMEN 136 5 AN ILLOGICAL IMMUNITY 136 6 CONCLUSIONS ON
THE MARITAL RAPE CASES 137 D RESTITUTION OF MONEY PAID UNDER A MISTAKE
OF LAW 138 1 THE FACTS AND ISSUES IN KLEINWORT BENSON V LINCOLN COUNTY
COUNCIL 138 2 REASONS FOR RETROACTIVITY 142 E PRIVATE LAW 143 1 THE
CREATION OF NEW LAW WITHOUT OVERRULING PRIOR AUTHORITY 144 (A) EXISTING
AUTHORITIES IN DISARRAY MAKING A DEGREE OF RETROACTIVITY INEVITABLE 144
(B) ABILITY TO RELY ON THE LAW NOT IN ISSUE 145 (C) GRADUAL DEVELOPMENT
OF NEW LAW 146 (D) MORAL OBLOQUY 150 (E) USE OF OBITER DICTA TO SIGNAL A
CHANGE IN THE LAW 151 2 THE CREATION OFNEW LAW BY OVERRULING A PRIOR
AUTHORITY 153 (A) ABILITY TO RELY ON THE LAW NOT IN ISSUE 153 (B) PRIOR
AUTHORITY WRONG IN PRINCIPLE 154 (C) RESPONSE TO CHANGED LEGAL
CIRCUMSTANCES 159 (D) RESPONSE TO CHANGED FACTUAL CIRCUMSTANCES 161 (E)
ABSENCE OF EFFECT ON LITIGANTS BEFORE THE COURT 163 (F) REFUSAL TO
OVERRULE A DECISION BECAUSE OF POTENTIAL RETROACTIVE EFFECTS 165 3
OVERRULING A PRIOR JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION OF A STATUTE 166 4
CONCLUSIONS ON PRIVATE LAW 171 F PUBLIC LAW 172 1 THE CREATION OF NEW
LAW WITHOUT OVERRULING PRIOR AUTHORITY 172 2 THE CREATION OF NEW LAW BY
OVERRULING PRIOR AUTHORITY 175 (A) JUDICIAL REVIEW OF QUESTIONS OF LAW
175 (B) JUDICIAL REVIEW OF QUESTIONS OF FACT 177 3 OVERRULING A PRIOR
JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION OF A STATUTE 178 4 CONCLUSIONS ON PUBLIC LAW 182
G CRIMINAL LAW 183 1 THE CREATION OF NEW LAW WITHOUT OVERRULING PRIOR
AUTHORITY 184 (A) JUDICIAL RESPONSE TO NEW FACTUAL CIRCUMSTANCES 184 (B)
PERCEIVED IMMORALITY 185 2 THE CREATION OF NEW LAW BY OVERRULING PRIOR
AUTHORITY 189 (A) PRIOR AUTHORITY WRONG IN PRINCIPLE 189 (B)
RETROACTIVITY IN FAVOUR OF A DEFENDANT 192 XII CONTENTS 3 OVERRULING A
PRIOR JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION OF A STATUTE 193 4 CONCLUSIONS ON CRIMINAL
LAW 196 H OVERRULING AND THE AGE OF A DECISION 197 6 PROSPECTIVE
OVERRULING 199 A WHAT IS PROSPECTIVE OVERRULING? 199 B THE STATUS QUO
200 1 ENGLAND 200 2 AUSTRALIA 204 3 NEW ZEALAND 205 4 CANADA 205 C
EVALUATION OF PROSPECTIVE OVERRULING 209 1 INCONSISTENCY WITH THE PROPER
SCOPE OF THE JUDICIAL FUNCTION IN COMMON LAW SYSTEMS 209 2 ARBITRARINESS
212 3 PROSPECTIVE OVERRRULING OF DECISIONS ABOUT STATUTORY AND
CONSTITUTIONAL CONSTRUCTION 214 D CONCLUSION 215 7 CONCLUSIONS 219 A
FOUNDATIONS 219 B COMPARISON OF CASES OF STATUTORY AND ADJUDICATIVE
RETROACTIVITY 220 C APPROACHING REBUTTAL OF THE PRESUMPTION 223 D
LEGISLATIVE AND JUDICIAL PROCESSES 224 E FINAL OBSERVATIONS 225
BIBLIOGRAPHY 227 INDEX 233 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author | Juratowitch, Ben |
| author_facet | Juratowitch, Ben |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Juratowitch, Ben |
| author_variant | b j bj |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV023320262 |
| callnumber-first | K - Law |
| callnumber-label | K566 |
| callnumber-raw | K566 |
| callnumber-search | K566 |
| callnumber-sort | K 3566 |
| callnumber-subject | K - General Law |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)181137128 (DE-599)BVBBV023320262 |
| dewey-full | 340.57 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 340 - Law |
| dewey-raw | 340.57 |
| dewey-search | 340.57 |
| dewey-sort | 3340.57 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
| era | Geschichte gnd |
| era_facet | Geschichte |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02077nam a2200541 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV023320262</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20081103 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">080529s2008 m||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">9781841137612</subfield><subfield code="9">9781841137612</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="z">1841137618</subfield><subfield code="9">1841137618</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)181137128</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV023320262</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">K566</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">340.57</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Juratowitch, Ben</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Retroactivity and the common law</subfield><subfield code="c">Ben Juratowitch</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Hart</subfield><subfield code="c">2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XXIX, 239 S.</subfield><subfield code="c">24 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Based on the doctoral thesis written by Ben Juratowitch while an Australian Rhodes Scholar at the University of Oxford</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes bibliographical references (p. [227]-231) and index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Retroactive laws</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Common law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Rétroactivité des lois</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Common law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Retroactive judicial decisions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Retroactive laws</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gerichtsentscheidung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4138783-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Common law</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4130774-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rückwirkung von Gesetzen</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4128179-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113937-9</subfield><subfield code="a">Hochschulschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4135952-5</subfield><subfield code="a">Quelle</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Common law</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4130774-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Rückwirkung von Gesetzen</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4128179-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Gerichtsentscheidung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4138783-1</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Geschichte</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="C">b</subfield><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">GBV Datenaustausch</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016504370&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016504370</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">340.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content (DE-588)4135952-5 Quelle gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Hochschulschrift Quelle |
| id | DE-604.BV023320262 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-02T20:53:30Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T21:15:48Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016504370 |
| oclc_num | 181137128 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | XXIX, 239 S. 24 cm |
| publishDate | 2008 |
| publishDateSearch | 2008 |
| publishDateSort | 2008 |
| publisher | Hart |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Juratowitch, Ben Verfasser aut Retroactivity and the common law Ben Juratowitch Oxford [u.a.] Hart 2008 XXIX, 239 S. 24 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Based on the doctoral thesis written by Ben Juratowitch while an Australian Rhodes Scholar at the University of Oxford Includes bibliographical references (p. [227]-231) and index Geschichte gnd rswk-swf Retroactive laws Common law Rétroactivité des lois Retroactive judicial decisions Gerichtsentscheidung (DE-588)4138783-1 gnd rswk-swf Common law (DE-588)4130774-4 gnd rswk-swf Rückwirkung von Gesetzen (DE-588)4128179-2 gnd rswk-swf (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content (DE-588)4135952-5 Quelle gnd-content Common law (DE-588)4130774-4 s Rückwirkung von Gesetzen (DE-588)4128179-2 s Gerichtsentscheidung (DE-588)4138783-1 s Geschichte z b DE-604 GBV Datenaustausch application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016504370&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Juratowitch, Ben Retroactivity and the common law Retroactive laws Common law Rétroactivité des lois Retroactive judicial decisions Gerichtsentscheidung (DE-588)4138783-1 gnd Common law (DE-588)4130774-4 gnd Rückwirkung von Gesetzen (DE-588)4128179-2 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4138783-1 (DE-588)4130774-4 (DE-588)4128179-2 (DE-588)4113937-9 (DE-588)4135952-5 |
| title | Retroactivity and the common law |
| title_auth | Retroactivity and the common law |
| title_exact_search | Retroactivity and the common law |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Retroactivity and the common law |
| title_full | Retroactivity and the common law Ben Juratowitch |
| title_fullStr | Retroactivity and the common law Ben Juratowitch |
| title_full_unstemmed | Retroactivity and the common law Ben Juratowitch |
| title_short | Retroactivity and the common law |
| title_sort | retroactivity and the common law |
| topic | Retroactive laws Common law Rétroactivité des lois Retroactive judicial decisions Gerichtsentscheidung (DE-588)4138783-1 gnd Common law (DE-588)4130774-4 gnd Rückwirkung von Gesetzen (DE-588)4128179-2 gnd |
| topic_facet | Retroactive laws Common law Rétroactivité des lois Retroactive judicial decisions Gerichtsentscheidung Rückwirkung von Gesetzen Hochschulschrift Quelle |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016504370&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT juratowitchben retroactivityandthecommonlaw |