Defamation: comparative law and practice
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
London
UCL Press
2007
|
| Ausgabe: | 1. publ., reprinted |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | Literaturverz. S. 403 - 422 |
| Beschreibung: | XLV, 431 S. |
| ISBN: | 1844720217 9781844720217 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV023305055 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20080619 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 080519s2007 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 1844720217 |9 1-84472-021-7 | ||
| 020 | |a 9781844720217 |9 978-1-84472-021-7 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)163267194 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV023305055 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-355 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 345.0256 |2 22 | |
| 084 | |a PL 625 |0 (DE-625)137089: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Kenyon, Andrew T. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Defamation |b comparative law and practice |c by Andrew T. Kenyon |
| 250 | |a 1. publ., reprinted | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a London |b UCL Press |c 2007 | |
| 300 | |a XLV, 431 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Literaturverz. S. 403 - 422 | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Libel and slander |z Australia | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Libel and slander |z England | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Libel and slander |z United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Libel and slander |z Wales | |
| 651 | 4 | |a Australien | |
| 651 | 4 | |a USA | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Regensburg |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016489449&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016489449 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804137635787046912 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
Preface v
Table
of Cases
xiii
Tables of Statutes and Rules
xxxiv
Short Citations and Abbreviations
xlv
1
INTRODUCTION
1
I OVERVIEW
1
A Chapter outline
3
В
Jurisdictional focus
6
С
Procedure and terminology
7
II EMPIRICAL LEGAL RESEARCH INTO DEFAMATION
9
A US research
9
В
Australian research
11
С
UK research
14
D
Other research into defamatory meaning
17
III AN EMPIRICAL AND DOCTRINAL FOCUS
20
2
IS A DEFAMATORY MEANING CONVEYED?
23
ENGLISH AND AUSTRALIAN LAW
I GENERAL ASPECTS OF MEANING
23
A Meanings are dealt with as imputations
23
В
Determining meaning: the ordinary recipient
24
С
Manner, occasion and mode of publication
25
D Role
of evidence in determining meaning
26
E
Considering the class of likely recipients
26
F
Roles of judge and jury
27
G Bane
and antidote
29
H
Rumour, repetition and meaning
29
I Jokes or vulgar abuse
30
J
Reports of criminal charges, suspicions and allegations
31
К
Legal innuendo meanings
31
II IS THE MEANING DEFAMATORY?
32
A Common law tests of what is defamatory
33
В
Contemporary standards
34
С
Roles of judge and jury
35
III QUESTIONS ABOUT MEANING
35
A Interlocutory determination of capable meanings
36
В
Implications, inferences and speculation
39
С
The stage of a trial for determining meaning
42
D
The single-meaning rule
43
E
Possible relevance of the publisher s apparent intention
45
F
Meaning as general impression, not elaborate analysis
48
vii
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
G
Legal requirements for pleading meaning
48
H
How parties are bound by pleaded meanings
54
I The degree of specificity required in pleaded meanings
60
IV CONCLUSION
66
3
DEFENCES RELEVANT TO MEANING: ENGLISH
67
AND AUSTRALIAN LAW
I JUSTIFICATION
68
A General aspects of justification
69
В
Mitigation and justification
72
С
Imputations must be proved true in substance
74
D
Justifying rumours
74
E
Justifying three levels of meaning: guilt, suspicion
75
or grounds to investigate
F
Allegations may be narrow or general
77
G
Allegations may be separate and distinct
77
H
Distinct allegations and partial justification
78
I Distinct allegations and extended justification in England
78
J
Distinct allegations and contextual truth in NSW
79
К
Non-distinct allegations and arguing about meaning:
80
Lucas-Box and Polly Peck
L
Pleading and justification
87
II OPINION DEFENCES
89
A Opinion rather than fact
90
В
Comment on a matter of public interest
91
С
Comment based on stated, indicated or notorious facts
92
D
Comment based on true facts
92
E
Comment based on privileged facts
93
F
Fairness: possible not reasonable opinion
94
G
No stricter test for comment imputing dishonest motives
94
H
Fairness: objective not subjective test for genuine opinion
95
I Malice
97
J
Pleading opinion defences
98
III CONCLUSION
99
4
MEANING: ENGLISH DEFAMATION PRACTICE
101
I INTERVIEW SAMPLE AND METHOD
102
A The sample of lawyers interviewed
102
В
The interviews style and content
103
С
Interviews provided the best information source
107
II GENERAL OBSERVATIONS ABOUT ENGLISH DEFAMATION
108
LITIGATION
A The number of claims issued annually
108
В
The types of parties in defamation claims
109
С
The number of meanings pleaded by litigants
110
Vili
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
III SEVEN LITIGATION
ISSUES
ABOUT MEANING
112
A Disputes about pleaded meanings
112
В
Precision in pleaded meanings
115
С
How a party is bound to a pleaded meaning
116
D
Defence pleading of meaning: Lucas-Box and
117
Polly Peck
E
Particulars, evidence and defence meanings
119
F
The trial stage for determining meaning;
120
the Marks
&
Spencer approach
G
Presenting the test for defamatory meaning to the jury
123
IV INTERVIEWEES VIEWS ABOUT REFORMS
125
A Summary disposal provisions of the
125
Defamation Act
1996
В
Possible roles of judge and jury
127
С
Other approaches to dealing with meaning
127
V CONCLUSION
128
MEANING: NEW SOUTH WALES DEFAMATION
129
PRACTICE
I RESEARCH SAMPLES AND METHODS
131
A Court files for defamation claims
131
В
Interviews with specialist lawyers
132
II INFORMATION FROM THE COURT FILES
134
A General information
135
В
Examples from the files
137
III MATERIAL FROM INTERVIEWS
152
A The defamation list
153
В
The cause of action under
s
9 154
С
Defences related to meaning: truth, contextual truth,
155
Lucas-Box, Polly Peck
D
Defences related to meaning: comment
158
E
The 7A trial, judge and jury roles
159
F
Reform
161
G
The test for what is defamatory
162
IV CONCLUSION
163
MEANING: VICTORIAN DEFAMATION PRACTICE
165
I RESEARCH SAMPLES AND METHODS
166
A Court files for defamation claims
166
В
Interviews with specialist lawyers
167
II INFORMATION FROM THE COURT FILES
169
A General information
169
В
Examples from the
f
iles
172
ix
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
III
MATERIAL
FROM
INTERVIEWS 183
A
Court
lists
183
В
Pleadings, challenges and the common law cause of action
184
С
Defences related to meaning: Lucas-Box, Polly Peck,
186
contextual imputations
D
Defences related to meaning: fair comment
188
E
Judge and jury roles
189
F
Other approaches to meaning
190
G
Reform
191
H
The test for what is defamatory
192
IV CONCLUSION
193
7
QUALMED PRIVILEGE: ENGLISH AND
195
AUSTRALIAN LAW AND PRACTICE
I INTRODUCTION
195
A Traditional defamation law and
1990s
developments
195
В
Chapter outline
197
II DEVELOPMENTS IN QUALIFIED PRIVILEGE
198
A The traditional defence
198
В
Australian code defences
200
С
England
—
Reynolds privilege
202
D
Australia
—Lange
privilege
212
E
Comparing the English and Australian law
221
III ENGLISH AND AUSTRALIAN PRACTICE
222
A Fieldwork
222
В
English interviews
223
С
Australian interviews
231
IV CONCLUSION
236
8
US DEFAMATION LAW AND PRACTICE
239
I OUTLINE OF US DEFAMATION LAW
240
A Traditional law to the Sullivan rules
240
В
Public plaintiffs
241
С
Private plaintiffs
244
D
The treatment of opinion
246
E
State and federal courts
247
F
Interlocutory hearings and appeals
248
G
Judges, juries and post-trial appellate review
252
II INTERVIEW SAMPLE AND METHOD
253
A The sample of lawyers interviewed
253
В
The interviews style and content
256
III GENERAL OBSERVATIONS ABOUT US DEFAMATION LITIGATION
256
A The number of claims against the media
257
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
В
Expertise
in defamation litigation
259
С
Multiple causes of action
260
D
Pre-trial motions not trials
260
E
Preferred courts
261
F
Legal fees and settlement
261
IV ISSUES ABOUT MEANING AND THE SULLIVAN RULES
263
A Meaning and pleading
264
В
Meaning and implication
266
С
Meaning and substantial truth
268
D
Meaning and mitigation
269
E
Motions to dismiss
271
F
Discovery and depositions
271
G
Motions for summary judgment
274
H
Motions to strike
275
I Actual malice and the plaintiff s status
275
J
Actual injury
277
К
Burden of proving falsity
278
V CONCLUSION
279
9
LUCAS-BOX AND POLLY PECK IN AUSTRALIA
281
I THE CHAKRAVARTI JUDGMENTS
283
II THE JUDGMENT OF BRENNAN CJ AND MCHUGH
J
286
A Bremridge
v
Latimer
287
В
Watkin
v
Hall
290
C Templeton v
Jones 291
III IMPLICATIONS FROM THE EMPIRICAL
RESEARCH 293
IV MODIFICATION OF LUCAS-BOX AND POLLY PECK
295
A Victorian decisions
296
В
Western Australian decisions
312
С
Other Australian decisions
320
D
English examples
321
E
Australia and Polly Peck
323
V CONCLUSION
324
10
COMPARATIVE DEFAMATION LAW AND PRACTICE
327
I COMPARATIVE LESSONS ABOUT MEANING
329
A Changes in NSW practice
330
В
Possible changes to NSW legislation:
336
the imputation-based cause of action
С
Possible changes to NSW legislation: the limited jury role
344
D
Further implications for the common law:
348
England and Australia
E
Uniform Australian defamation law and meaning
361
xi
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
II
REYNOLDS AND LANGE PRIVILEGE
372
A
Scope, strength and litigation practicality
372
В
Developing
Lange
and
s
22? 374
С
Australian uniform defamation law and privilege?
377
III US DEFAMATION LAW AND PRACTICE
380
A Meaning in US defamation
380
В
Defamation litigation s usual steps
382
С
Lawyers experience
382
D
Plaintiff status not subject matter
382
E
Common complexity?
383
F
Future US and comparative research
387
IV CONCLUSION
389
APPENDIX EMPIRICAL METHODOLOGY AND
RESEARCH SAMPLES
393
I THE PROJECT HAS TWO TYPES OF EMPIRICAL SOURCE
393
II THE MECHANICS OF THE FIELDWORK AND INITIAL ANALYSIS
395
III QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE METHODS
397
IV THE STATUS OF THE INFORMATION AND ITS ANALYSIS
398
Bibliograph}/ 403
Index
423
xu
|
| adam_txt |
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
Preface v
Table
of Cases
xiii
Tables of Statutes and Rules
xxxiv
Short Citations and Abbreviations
xlv
1
INTRODUCTION
1
I OVERVIEW
1
A Chapter outline
3
В
Jurisdictional focus
6
С
Procedure and terminology
7
II EMPIRICAL LEGAL RESEARCH INTO DEFAMATION
9
A US research
9
В
Australian research
11
С
UK research
14
D
Other research into defamatory meaning
17
III AN EMPIRICAL AND DOCTRINAL FOCUS
20
2
IS A DEFAMATORY MEANING CONVEYED?
23
ENGLISH AND AUSTRALIAN LAW
I GENERAL ASPECTS OF MEANING
23
A Meanings are dealt with as imputations
23
В
Determining meaning: the ordinary recipient
24
С
Manner, occasion and mode of publication
25
D Role
of evidence in determining meaning
26
E
Considering the class of likely recipients
26
F
Roles of judge and jury
27
G Bane
and antidote
29
H
Rumour, repetition and meaning
29
I Jokes or vulgar abuse
30
J
Reports of criminal charges, suspicions and allegations
31
К
Legal innuendo meanings
31
II IS THE MEANING DEFAMATORY?
32
A Common law tests of what is defamatory
33
В
Contemporary standards
34
С
Roles of judge and jury
35
III QUESTIONS ABOUT MEANING
35
A Interlocutory determination of 'capable meanings'
36
В
Implications, inferences and speculation
39
С
The stage of a trial for determining meaning
42
D
The single-meaning 'rule'
43
E
Possible relevance of the publisher's apparent intention
45
F
Meaning as general impression, not elaborate analysis
48
vii
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
G
Legal requirements for pleading meaning
48
H
How parties are bound by pleaded meanings
54
I The degree of specificity required in pleaded meanings
60
IV CONCLUSION
66
3
DEFENCES RELEVANT TO MEANING: ENGLISH
67
AND AUSTRALIAN LAW
I JUSTIFICATION
68
A General aspects of justification
69
В
Mitigation and justification
72
С
Imputations must be proved true in substance
74
D
Justifying rumours
74
E
Justifying three levels of meaning: guilt, suspicion
75
or grounds to investigate
F
Allegations may be narrow or general
77
G
Allegations may be separate and distinct
77
H
Distinct allegations and partial justification
78
I Distinct allegations and extended justification in England
78
J
Distinct allegations and contextual truth in NSW
79
К
Non-distinct allegations and arguing about meaning:
80
Lucas-Box and Polly Peck
L
Pleading and justification
87
II OPINION DEFENCES
89
A Opinion rather than fact
90
В
Comment on a matter of public interest
91
С
Comment based on stated, indicated or notorious facts
92
D
Comment based on true facts
92
E
Comment based on privileged facts
93
F
Fairness: possible not reasonable opinion
94
G
No stricter test for comment imputing dishonest motives
94
H
Fairness: objective not subjective test for genuine opinion
95
I Malice
97
J
Pleading opinion defences
98
III CONCLUSION
99
4
MEANING: ENGLISH DEFAMATION PRACTICE
101
I INTERVIEW SAMPLE AND METHOD
102
A The sample of lawyers interviewed
102
В
The interviews' style and content
103
С
Interviews provided the best information source
107
II GENERAL OBSERVATIONS ABOUT ENGLISH DEFAMATION
108
LITIGATION
A The number of claims issued annually
108
В
The types of parties in defamation claims
109
С
The number of meanings pleaded by litigants
110
Vili
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
III SEVEN LITIGATION
ISSUES
ABOUT MEANING
112
A Disputes about pleaded meanings
112
В
Precision in pleaded meanings
115
С
How a party is bound to a pleaded meaning
116
D
Defence pleading of meaning: Lucas-Box and
117
Polly Peck
E
Particulars, evidence and defence meanings
119
F
The trial stage for determining meaning;
120
the Marks
&
Spencer approach
G
Presenting the test for defamatory meaning to the jury
123
IV INTERVIEWEES' VIEWS ABOUT REFORMS
125
A Summary disposal provisions of the
125
Defamation Act
1996
В
Possible roles of judge and jury
127
С
Other approaches to dealing with meaning
127
V CONCLUSION
128
MEANING: NEW SOUTH WALES DEFAMATION
129
PRACTICE
I RESEARCH SAMPLES AND METHODS
131
A Court files for defamation claims
131
В
Interviews with specialist lawyers
132
II INFORMATION FROM THE COURT FILES
134
A General information
135
В
Examples from the files
137
III MATERIAL FROM INTERVIEWS
152
A The defamation list
153
В
The cause of action under
s
9 154
С
Defences related to meaning: truth, contextual truth,
155
Lucas-Box, Polly Peck
D
Defences related to meaning: comment
158
E
The 7A trial, judge and jury roles
159
F
Reform
161
G
The test for what is defamatory
162
IV CONCLUSION
163
MEANING: VICTORIAN DEFAMATION PRACTICE
165
I RESEARCH SAMPLES AND METHODS
166
A Court files for defamation claims
166
В
Interviews with specialist lawyers
167
II INFORMATION FROM THE COURT FILES
169
A General information
169
В
Examples from the
f
iles
172
ix
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
III
MATERIAL
FROM
INTERVIEWS 183
A
Court
lists
183
В
Pleadings, challenges and the common law cause of action
184
С
Defences related to meaning: Lucas-Box, Polly Peck,
186
contextual imputations
D
Defences related to meaning: fair comment
188
E
Judge and jury roles
189
F
Other approaches to meaning
190
G
Reform
191
H
The test for what is defamatory
192
IV CONCLUSION
193
7
QUALMED PRIVILEGE: ENGLISH AND
195
AUSTRALIAN LAW AND PRACTICE
I INTRODUCTION
195
A Traditional defamation law and
1990s
developments
195
В
Chapter outline
197
II DEVELOPMENTS IN QUALIFIED PRIVILEGE
198
A The traditional defence
198
В
Australian code defences
200
С
England
—
Reynolds privilege
202
D
Australia
—Lange
privilege
212
E
Comparing the English and Australian law
221
III ENGLISH AND AUSTRALIAN PRACTICE
222
A Fieldwork
222
В
English interviews
223
С
Australian interviews
231
IV CONCLUSION
236
8
US DEFAMATION LAW AND PRACTICE
239
I OUTLINE OF US DEFAMATION LAW
240
A Traditional law to the Sullivan rules
240
В
Public plaintiffs
241
С
Private plaintiffs
244
D
The treatment of opinion
246
E
State and federal courts
247
F
Interlocutory hearings and appeals
248
G
Judges, juries and post-trial appellate review
252
II INTERVIEW SAMPLE AND METHOD
253
A The sample of lawyers interviewed
253
В
The interviews'style and content
256
III GENERAL OBSERVATIONS ABOUT US DEFAMATION LITIGATION
256
A The number of claims against the media
257
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
В
Expertise
in defamation litigation
259
С
Multiple causes of action
260
D
Pre-trial motions not trials
260
E
Preferred courts
261
F
Legal fees and settlement
261
IV ISSUES ABOUT MEANING AND THE SULLIVAN RULES
263
A Meaning and pleading
264
В
Meaning and implication
266
С
Meaning and substantial truth
268
D
Meaning and mitigation
269
E
Motions to dismiss
271
F
Discovery and depositions
271
G
Motions for summary judgment
274
H
Motions to strike
275
I Actual malice and the plaintiff's status
275
J
Actual injury
277
К
Burden of proving falsity
278
V CONCLUSION
279
9
LUCAS-BOX AND POLLY PECK IN AUSTRALIA
281
I THE CHAKRAVARTI JUDGMENTS
283
II THE JUDGMENT OF BRENNAN CJ AND MCHUGH
J
286
A Bremridge
v
Latimer
287
В
Watkin
v
Hall
290
C Templeton v
Jones 291
III IMPLICATIONS FROM THE EMPIRICAL
RESEARCH 293
IV MODIFICATION OF LUCAS-BOX AND POLLY PECK
295
A Victorian decisions
296
В
Western Australian decisions
312
С
Other Australian decisions
320
D
English examples
321
E
Australia and Polly Peck
323
V CONCLUSION
324
10
COMPARATIVE DEFAMATION LAW AND PRACTICE
327
I COMPARATIVE LESSONS ABOUT MEANING
329
A Changes in NSW practice
330
В
Possible changes to NSW legislation:
336
the imputation-based cause of action
С
Possible changes to NSW legislation: the limited jury role
344
D
Further implications for the common law:
348
England and Australia
E
Uniform Australian defamation law and meaning
361
xi
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
II
REYNOLDS AND LANGE PRIVILEGE
372
A
Scope, strength and litigation practicality
372
В
Developing
Lange
and
s
22? 374
С
Australian uniform defamation law and privilege?
377
III US DEFAMATION LAW AND PRACTICE
380
A Meaning in US defamation
380
В
Defamation litigation's usual steps
382
С
Lawyers' experience
382
D
Plaintiff status not subject matter
382
E
Common complexity?
383
F
Future US and comparative research
387
IV CONCLUSION
389
APPENDIX EMPIRICAL METHODOLOGY AND
RESEARCH SAMPLES
393
I THE PROJECT HAS TWO TYPES OF EMPIRICAL SOURCE
393
II THE MECHANICS OF THE FIELDWORK AND INITIAL ANALYSIS
395
III QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE METHODS
397
IV THE STATUS OF THE INFORMATION AND ITS ANALYSIS
398
Bibliograph}/ 403
Index
423
xu |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author | Kenyon, Andrew T. |
| author_facet | Kenyon, Andrew T. |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Kenyon, Andrew T. |
| author_variant | a t k at atk |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV023305055 |
| classification_rvk | PL 625 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)163267194 (DE-599)BVBBV023305055 |
| dewey-full | 345.0256 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 345 - Criminal law |
| dewey-raw | 345.0256 |
| dewey-search | 345.0256 |
| dewey-sort | 3345.0256 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
| edition | 1. publ., reprinted |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01381nam a2200397 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV023305055</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20080619 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">080519s2007 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1844720217</subfield><subfield code="9">1-84472-021-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781844720217</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-84472-021-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)163267194</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV023305055</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">345.0256</subfield><subfield code="2">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PL 625</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)137089:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kenyon, Andrew T.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Defamation</subfield><subfield code="b">comparative law and practice</subfield><subfield code="c">by Andrew T. Kenyon</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1. publ., reprinted</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">London</subfield><subfield code="b">UCL Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XLV, 431 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Literaturverz. S. 403 - 422</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Libel and slander</subfield><subfield code="z">Australia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Libel and slander</subfield><subfield code="z">England</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Libel and slander</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Libel and slander</subfield><subfield code="z">Wales</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Australien</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Regensburg</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016489449&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016489449</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Australien USA |
| geographic_facet | Australien USA |
| id | DE-604.BV023305055 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-02T20:48:08Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T21:15:26Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 1844720217 9781844720217 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016489449 |
| oclc_num | 163267194 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-355 DE-BY-UBR |
| owner_facet | DE-355 DE-BY-UBR |
| physical | XLV, 431 S. |
| publishDate | 2007 |
| publishDateSearch | 2007 |
| publishDateSort | 2007 |
| publisher | UCL Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Kenyon, Andrew T. Verfasser aut Defamation comparative law and practice by Andrew T. Kenyon 1. publ., reprinted London UCL Press 2007 XLV, 431 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Literaturverz. S. 403 - 422 Libel and slander Australia Libel and slander England Libel and slander United States Libel and slander Wales Australien USA Digitalisierung UB Regensburg application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016489449&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Kenyon, Andrew T. Defamation comparative law and practice Libel and slander Australia Libel and slander England Libel and slander United States Libel and slander Wales |
| title | Defamation comparative law and practice |
| title_auth | Defamation comparative law and practice |
| title_exact_search | Defamation comparative law and practice |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Defamation comparative law and practice |
| title_full | Defamation comparative law and practice by Andrew T. Kenyon |
| title_fullStr | Defamation comparative law and practice by Andrew T. Kenyon |
| title_full_unstemmed | Defamation comparative law and practice by Andrew T. Kenyon |
| title_short | Defamation |
| title_sort | defamation comparative law and practice |
| title_sub | comparative law and practice |
| topic | Libel and slander Australia Libel and slander England Libel and slander United States Libel and slander Wales |
| topic_facet | Libel and slander Australia Libel and slander England Libel and slander United States Libel and slander Wales Australien USA |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016489449&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kenyonandrewt defamationcomparativelawandpractice |