Rediscovering the law of negligence:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Oxford [u.a.]
Hart
2007 [erschienen] 2008
|
| Ausgabe: | Reprinted |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | XXXI, 530 S. |
| ISBN: | 9781841136868 1841136867 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV023290202 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20080509 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 080506s2008 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781841136868 |9 978-1-8411-3686-8 | ||
| 020 | |a 1841136867 |9 1-84113-686-7 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)633146442 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV023290202 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-355 | ||
| 084 | |a PU 4346 |0 (DE-625)140564: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Beever, Allan |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Rediscovering the law of negligence |c Allan Beever |
| 250 | |a Reprinted | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Oxford [u.a.] |b Hart |c 2007 [erschienen] 2008 | |
| 300 | |a XXXI, 530 S. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m SWBplus Fremddatenuebernahme |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016474827&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016474827 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804137613141999616 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS IX TABLE OF CASES XIX TABLE OF LEGISLATION
XXIX 1. INTRODUCTION 1 I. THE DISINTEGRATION OF THE MODERN LAW 1 A. A
VERY BRIEF HISTORY 1 B. IMPLICATIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MODERN
LAW: THE ROLE OF POLICY 3 C. IMPLICATIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE
MODERN LAW: THE ROLE OF PRINCIPLE 8 D. LESS REALISTIC VIEWS 11 E.
DEFINING POLICY NARROWLY 17 II. AN ALTERNATIVE 19 A. HISTORY REVISITED
19 B. STRATEGY AND METHODOLOGY 21 (I) GENERAL STRATEGY 21 (A)
INTERPRETIVE LEGAL THEORY 21 (B) REFLECTIVE EQUILIBRIUM 25 (C)
TRANSPARENCY, POLICY, JUDICIAL DECISION MAKING AND REFLECTIVE
EQUILIBRIUM 28 (II) APPLYING THE METHODOLOGY TO THE LAW OF NEGLIGENCE 28
(A) THE PRINCIPLED APPROACH 28 (B) THE MODERN LAW 30 (C) AN INTERNAL,
NOT EXTERNAL, ANALYSIS 34 (III) FORMAT OF THE BOOK 36 III. CONCLUDING
REMARKS 39 2. CORRECTIVE JUSTICE, NEGLIGENCE AND TORT LAW 41 I. SPHERES
OF MORALITY 42 II. THE FORM OF CORRECTIVE JUSTICE 45 III. CORRECTIVE
JUSTICE, THE PRINCIPLED APPROACH AND THE ROLE OF JUDGEMENT 46 IV.
CORRECTIVE JUSTICE AND THE DEFINITION OF PRINCIPLE AND POLICY 50 V. THE
APOLITICAL NATURE OF CORRECTIVE JUSTICE 52 VI. TWO POTENTIAL OBJECTIONS
55 A. THE INCOMPLETENESS OBJECTION AND THE RIGHT OF CORRECTIVE JUSTICE
56 XII CONTENTS (I) THE INCOMPLETENESS OF CORRECTIVE JUSTICE 56 (II) THE
INCOMPLETENESS OF THE PRINCIPLED APPROACH 61 (III) THE RIGHTS BASE OF
THE LAW OF NEGLIGENCE AND CORRECTIVE JUSTICE 63 (IV) THE RIGHTS BASE OF
THE LAW OF NEGLIGENCE AND DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE 66 (V) CONCLUSION 69 B.
THE INCONSISTENCY OBJECTION: CORRECTIVE JUSTICE AND THE GENERAL LAW OF
TORT 70 3. THE STANDARD OF CARE 73 I. THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN ACTION AND
MERE BEHAVIOUR 74 II. THE OBJECTIVE STANDARD 78 A. JUSTIFYING THE
OBJECTIVE STANDARD 79 B. WHO IS THE ORDINARY REASONABLE PERSON? 84 C.
THE OBJECTIVE STANDARD AND CORRECTIVE JUSTICE 86 D. ADJUSTING THE
OBJECTIVE STANDARD 87 III. REASONABLE CARE 96 A. THE LEADING CASES 96 B.
THE STANDARD OF CARE AND CORRECTIVE JUSTICE 103 C. SUMMARY 106 D.
PROBLEMATIC CASES 106 E. CONCLUSION 111 IV. STRICT LIABILITY AND
CORRECTIVE JUSTICE 111 V. RECENT LEGISLATION 112 4. DUTY AND REMOTENESS
115 I. THE DUTY OF CARE 115 A. THE NATURE OF THE DUTY OF CARE 115 (I)
WINTERBOTTOM V WRIGHT 115 (II) DONOGHUE V STEVENSON 118 (III) PALSGRAF
123 B. THE DUTY OF CARE AND CORRECTIVE JUSTICE 128 II. REMOTENESS OF
DAMAGE 129 A. THE NATURE OF REMOTENESS 129 (I) POLEMIS 129 (II) THE
WAGON MOUND (NO 1) 131 B. REMOTENESS AND CORRECTIVE JUSTICE 132 C.
REMOTENESS, THE INJURY AND THE ACCIDENT 133 (I) THE GENERAL APPROACH 133
(II) THE CHAIN OF EVENTS 137 (III) THE EXTENT OF THE CLAIMANT S INJURY
139 CONTENTS XIII (IV) REMOTENESS AND JUDGMENT 140 (V) HUGHES V LORD
ADVOCATE AGAIN 142 III. THE ROLE OF REASONABLE FORESEEABILITY IN DUTY
AND REMOTENESS 143 IV. ILLUSTRATIONS OF DUTY AND REMOTENESS 145 A.
LIABILITY TO RESCUERS 145 B. NOT-YET-EXISTENT CLAIMANTS 148 C. NOVUS
ACTUS INTERVENIENS 149 (I) CASE LAW 149 (II) AN ALTERNATIVE 156 D. THE
EXCEPTION: THE THIN SKULL RULE 162 V. CONCLUSION 166 5. MODERN
APPROACHES TO THE DUTY OF CARE 167 I. THE ANNS APPROACH 167 A. THE
DEVELOPMENT OF THE ANNS APPROACH 167 B. CRITICISM OF THE ANNS APPROACH
170 II. THE INCREMENTAL APPROACH 182 A. THE FORMULATION OF THE
INCREMENTAL APPROACH 182 B. THE INCREMENTAL APPROACH AND THE NEIGHBOUR
TEST 183 (I) PROXIMITY AND REASONABLE FORESEEABILITY 183 (II) THE
INCREMENTAL APPROACH AND POLICY 187 C. INCREMENTALISM AND JUSTIFICATION
190 D. CONCLUSION 193 III. VULNERABILITY: A NEW APPROACH? 194 IV. THE
MODERN APPROACHES AND THE PLACE OF TORT LAW WITHIN THE LAW OF
OBLIGATIONS 195 V. COMPARING THE APPROACHES 197 VI. CONCLUSION 204 6.
MISFEASANCE, NONFEASANCE AND THE RIGHTS BASE OF THE LAW OF NEGLIGENCE
205 I. THE TRADITIONAL UNDERSTANDING OF THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN
MISFEASANCE AND NONFEASANCE 205 A. ACTS AND OMISSIONS 205 B.
JUSTIFICATION FOR THE ACT/OMISSION DISTINCTION 209 II. THE RIGHTS BASE
OF THE LAW OF NEGLIGENCE 210 A. PRIMARY RIGHTS AND INJURIES 210 B.
PRIMARY RIGHTS AND THE STRUCTURE OF THE LAW OF OBLIGATIONS 212 C.
STANDARD OBJECTIONS 214 III. THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN MISFEASANCE AND
NONFEASANCE 217 IV. CONCLUSION 222 XIV CONTENTS 7. ECONOMIC LOSS 223 I.
CONSEQUENTIAL AND RELATIONAL ECONOMIC LOSS 223 A. THE MODERN APPROACHES
223 B. THE PRINCIPLED APPROACH 232 (I) INDETERMINATE LIABILITY 233 (II)
ULTRAMARES 234 (III) DONOGHUE V STEVENSON, NONFEASANCE AND THE RIGHTS OF
TORT LAW 237 C. THE PRINCIPLED APPROACH TO RELATIONAL LOSS 239 D. THE
PRINCIPLED APPROACH TO CONSEQUENTIAL LOSS 246 II. PURE ECONOMIC LOSS 250
A. THE BUILDING CASES 250 (I) THE PRINCIPLED APPROACH 250 (II) THE
POLICY-DRIVEN APPROACHES 252 (III) THE RISK TO THE OWNER S PERSON AND
PROPERTY AND RISK TO OTHERS 256 B. THE DISAPPOINTED BENEFICIARY CASES
260 III. ECONOMIC LOSS, PRIMARY RIGHTS AND THE GENERAL LAW 267 IV.
ECONOMIC LOSS IN NEGLIGENCE AND THE ECONOMIC TORTS 269 V. CONCLUSION 272
8. NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION AND ASSUMPTION OF RESPONSIBILITY 273 I.
THE NEGLIGENCE MODEL 274 A. CANDLER V CRANE CHRISTMAS & CO 274 B. THE
ANNS TEST AND NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION 276 C. THE INCREMENTAL
APPROACH AND NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION 281 D. REJECTION OF THE
NEGLIGENCE MODEL 282 II. THE ASSUMPTION OF RESPONSIBILITY MODEL 284 A.
THE JUDGMENT IN HEDLEY BYRNE 284 B. THE ROLE OF ASSUMPTION OF
RESPONSIBILITY IN NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION 287 (I) DISCLAIMERS 287
(II) CAUSAL CONVERSATIONS 291 (III) SPECIAL SKILL 292 (IV) THE PURPOSE
OF THE REPRESENTATION AND THE PERSON FOR WHOSE BENEFIT THE STATEMENT WAS
MADE 293 C. PERCEIVED DIFFICULTIES WITH THE ASSUMPTION OF RESPONSIBILITY
MODEL 298 (I) THE PIGEONHOLE ARGUMENT 298 (II) THE ROLE OF PROXIMITY 299
(III) THE ROLE OF REASONABLE FORESEEABILITY 299 (IV) THE ROLE OF
RELIANCE 300 CONTENTS XV (V) THE ROLE OF NEGLIGENCE 301 (VI) CRITICISMS
OF THE NOTION OF ASSUMPTION OF RESPONSIBILITY 303 D. CONCLUSION 310 III.
NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION AND THE PRIVATE LAW 311 IV. THE RIGHT OF
SPRING 316 9. NONFEASANCE AND THE LIABILITY OF PUBLIC BODIES 321 I.
NONFEASANCE IN GENERAL 321 A. THE SCOPE OF THE RULE 321 B. ASSUMPTIONS
OF RESPONSIBILITY AND NONFEASANCE 333 II. THE LIABILITY OF PUBLIC BODIES
335 A. GENERAL THEORY 335 (I) THE LIABILITY OF PUBLIC BODIES WHERE,
PRIMA FACIE, A COMMON LAW PRIMARY RIGHT HAS BEEN VIOLATED 335 (II) THE
LIABILITY OF PUBLIC BODIES WHERE, PRIMA FACIE, A COMMON LAW PRIMARY
RIGHT HAS NOT BEEN VIOLATED 337 B. CASE LAW 338 10. DEFENCES 341 I.
CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE 341 II. VOLENTI NON FIT INJURIA 345 A. THE TWO
PARTS OF THE DEFENCE 345 B. WILLING THE HARM 349 C. CONSENTING TO THE
RISK OF THE HARM 357 D. THE VOLENTI DEFENCE AND RESCUERS 365 III.
ILLEGALITY 372 A. GALA V PRESTON 311 B. CORY J IN HALL V HEBERT 377 C.
CORRECTIVE JUSTICE AND ILLEGALITY: WEINRIB AND MCLACHLIN J IN HALL V
HEBERT 379 11. WRONGFUL BIRTH, WRONGFUL CONCEPTION AND NERVOUS SHOCK 385
I. WRONGFUL BIRTH 385 II. WRONGFUL CONCEPTION 386 A. CASE LAW 386 B. THE
LAW OF NEGLIGENCE 389 C. RECOVERY UNDER AN ASSUMPTION OF RESPONSIBILITY
402 III. NERVOUS SHOCK 404 A. PRIMARY VICTIMS 404 B. SECONDARY VICTIMS
407 C. NERVOUS SHOCK AND THE RIGHTS OF THE CLAIMANT 409 XVI CONTENTS 12.
CAUSATION 413 I. WHY CAUSATION? 413 II. THE NATURE OF FACTUAL CAUSATION
415 A. CASE LAW: THE BUT FOR TEST AND ITS ALTERNATIVES 415 B. THE NESS
TEST AND THE TARGETED BUT FOR TEST 418 (I) INTRODUCING THE TESTS 418
(II) PROBLEMS WITH THE TARGETED BUT FOR TEST 419 (III) PROBLEMS WITH THE
NESS TEST 422 C. THE NATURE OF FACTUAL CAUSATION IN OUTLINE 425 D.
EXPLORING FACTUAL CAUSATION 427 III. LIABILITY IN CASES OF
OVER-DETERMINATION 431 A. THE PROBLEM 431 B. NEGLIGENCE AND NOMINAL
DAMAGES 433 C. WRIGHT ON DAMAGES 434 D. THE CLAIMANT S RIGHTS AND
FACTUAL CAUSATION 435 E. APPLYING THE THEORY TO MORE COMPLEX FACT
PATTERNS 439 13. PROOF AND UNCERTAINTY 445 I. THE BURDEN OF PROOF 446
II. UNCERTAINTY OVER WHETHER THE DEFENDANT WAS NEGLIGENT 447 III.
UNCERTAINTY OVER FACTUAL CAUSATION 453 A. THE PRINCIPLED APPROACH TO
FACTUAL UNCERTAINTY 453 B. APPLYING THE PRINCIPLED APPROACH TO CASES OF
FACTUAL UNCERTAINTY 465 (I) MCGHEE 465 (II) WILSHER ALL (III) FAIRCHILD
472 (IV) SCIENTIFIC UNCERTAINTY AND UNCERTAINTY IN GENERAL 489 IV. LOSS
OF A CHANCE 492 A. THE PROBLEM: GREGG V SCOTT 492 (I) LORD NICHOLLS
MAIN ARGUMENT 493 (II) LORD NICHOLLS SECONDARY ARGUMENT 494 (III) LORD
HOFFMANN S MAIN ARGUMENT 496 (IV) LORD HOFFMANN S SECONDARY ARGUMENT 497
B. WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO SAY THAT THERE WAS A CHANCE? 498 (I) THE
ARGUMENT FROM QUANTUM PHYSICS 499 (II) FREE WILL 502 (III) LOSS OF
CHANCE AND FACTUAL UNCERTAINTY 503 C. ANOTHER KIND OF LOSS OF A CHANCE
504 CONTENTS XVII 14. CONCLUSION 507 I. CORRECTIVE JUSTICE AND LEGAL
CHANGE 507 II. POLICY AND PRINCIPLE: REDISCOVERING THE LAW OF NEGLIGENCE
512 BIBLIOGRAPHY 517 INDEX 527
|
| adam_txt |
CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS IX TABLE OF CASES XIX TABLE OF LEGISLATION
XXIX 1. INTRODUCTION 1 I. THE DISINTEGRATION OF THE MODERN LAW 1 A. A
VERY BRIEF HISTORY 1 B. IMPLICATIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MODERN
LAW: THE ROLE OF POLICY 3 C. IMPLICATIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE
MODERN LAW: THE ROLE OF PRINCIPLE 8 D. LESS'REALISTIC'VIEWS 11 E.
DEFINING POLICY NARROWLY 17 II. AN ALTERNATIVE 19 A. HISTORY REVISITED
19 B. STRATEGY AND METHODOLOGY 21 (I) GENERAL STRATEGY 21 (A)
INTERPRETIVE LEGAL THEORY 21 (B) REFLECTIVE EQUILIBRIUM 25 (C)
TRANSPARENCY, POLICY, JUDICIAL DECISION MAKING AND REFLECTIVE
EQUILIBRIUM 28 (II) APPLYING THE METHODOLOGY TO THE LAW OF NEGLIGENCE 28
(A) THE PRINCIPLED APPROACH 28 (B) THE MODERN LAW 30 (C) AN INTERNAL,
NOT EXTERNAL, ANALYSIS 34 (III) FORMAT OF THE BOOK 36 III. CONCLUDING
REMARKS 39 2. CORRECTIVE JUSTICE, NEGLIGENCE AND TORT LAW 41 I. SPHERES
OF MORALITY 42 II. THE FORM OF CORRECTIVE JUSTICE 45 III. CORRECTIVE
JUSTICE, THE PRINCIPLED APPROACH AND THE ROLE OF JUDGEMENT 46 IV.
CORRECTIVE JUSTICE AND THE DEFINITION OF PRINCIPLE AND POLICY 50 V. THE
APOLITICAL NATURE OF CORRECTIVE JUSTICE 52 VI. TWO POTENTIAL OBJECTIONS
55 A. THE INCOMPLETENESS OBJECTION AND THE RIGHT OF CORRECTIVE JUSTICE
56 XII CONTENTS (I) THE INCOMPLETENESS OF CORRECTIVE JUSTICE 56 (II) THE
INCOMPLETENESS OF THE PRINCIPLED APPROACH 61 (III) THE RIGHTS BASE OF
THE LAW OF NEGLIGENCE AND CORRECTIVE JUSTICE 63 (IV) THE RIGHTS BASE OF
THE LAW OF NEGLIGENCE AND DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE 66 (V) CONCLUSION 69 B.
THE INCONSISTENCY OBJECTION: CORRECTIVE JUSTICE AND THE GENERAL LAW OF
TORT 70 3. THE STANDARD OF CARE 73 I. THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN ACTION AND
MERE BEHAVIOUR 74 II. THE OBJECTIVE STANDARD 78 A. JUSTIFYING THE
OBJECTIVE STANDARD 79 B. WHO IS THE ORDINARY REASONABLE PERSON? 84 C.
THE OBJECTIVE STANDARD AND CORRECTIVE JUSTICE 86 D. ADJUSTING THE
OBJECTIVE STANDARD 87 III. REASONABLE CARE 96 A. THE LEADING CASES 96 B.
THE STANDARD OF CARE AND CORRECTIVE JUSTICE 103 C. SUMMARY 106 D.
PROBLEMATIC CASES 106 E. CONCLUSION 111 IV. STRICT LIABILITY AND
CORRECTIVE JUSTICE 111 V. RECENT LEGISLATION 112 4. DUTY AND REMOTENESS
115 I. THE DUTY OF CARE 115 A. THE NATURE OF THE DUTY OF CARE 115 (I)
WINTERBOTTOM V WRIGHT 115 (II) DONOGHUE V STEVENSON 118 (III) PALSGRAF
123 B. THE DUTY OF CARE AND CORRECTIVE JUSTICE 128 II. REMOTENESS OF
DAMAGE 129 A. THE NATURE OF REMOTENESS 129 (I) POLEMIS 129 (II) THE
WAGON MOUND (NO 1) 131 B. REMOTENESS AND CORRECTIVE JUSTICE 132 C.
REMOTENESS, THE INJURY AND THE ACCIDENT 133 (I) THE GENERAL APPROACH 133
(II) THE CHAIN OF EVENTS 137 (III) THE EXTENT OF THE CLAIMANT'S INJURY
139 CONTENTS XIII (IV) REMOTENESS AND JUDGMENT 140 (V) HUGHES V LORD
ADVOCATE AGAIN 142 III. THE ROLE OF REASONABLE FORESEEABILITY IN DUTY
AND REMOTENESS 143 IV. ILLUSTRATIONS OF DUTY AND REMOTENESS 145 A.
LIABILITY TO RESCUERS 145 B. NOT-YET-EXISTENT CLAIMANTS 148 C. NOVUS
ACTUS INTERVENIENS 149 (I) CASE LAW 149 (II) AN ALTERNATIVE 156 D. THE
EXCEPTION: THE THIN SKULL RULE 162 V. CONCLUSION 166 5. MODERN
APPROACHES TO THE DUTY OF CARE 167 I. THE ANNS APPROACH 167 A. THE
DEVELOPMENT OF THE ANNS APPROACH 167 B. CRITICISM OF THE ANNS APPROACH
170 II. THE INCREMENTAL APPROACH 182 A. THE FORMULATION OF THE
INCREMENTAL APPROACH 182 B. THE INCREMENTAL APPROACH AND THE NEIGHBOUR
TEST 183 (I) PROXIMITY AND REASONABLE FORESEEABILITY 183 (II) THE
INCREMENTAL APPROACH AND POLICY 187 C. INCREMENTALISM AND JUSTIFICATION
190 D. CONCLUSION 193 III. VULNERABILITY: A NEW APPROACH? 194 IV. THE
MODERN APPROACHES AND THE PLACE OF TORT LAW WITHIN THE LAW OF
OBLIGATIONS 195 V. COMPARING THE APPROACHES 197 VI. CONCLUSION 204 6.
MISFEASANCE, NONFEASANCE AND THE RIGHTS BASE OF THE LAW OF NEGLIGENCE
205 I. THE TRADITIONAL UNDERSTANDING OF THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN
MISFEASANCE AND NONFEASANCE 205 A. ACTS AND OMISSIONS 205 B.
JUSTIFICATION FOR THE ACT/OMISSION DISTINCTION 209 II. THE RIGHTS BASE
OF THE LAW OF NEGLIGENCE 210 A. PRIMARY RIGHTS AND INJURIES 210 B.
PRIMARY RIGHTS AND THE STRUCTURE OF THE LAW OF OBLIGATIONS 212 C.
STANDARD OBJECTIONS 214 III. THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN MISFEASANCE AND
NONFEASANCE 217 IV. CONCLUSION 222 XIV CONTENTS 7. ECONOMIC LOSS 223 I.
CONSEQUENTIAL AND RELATIONAL ECONOMIC LOSS 223 A. THE MODERN APPROACHES
223 B. THE PRINCIPLED APPROACH 232 (I) INDETERMINATE LIABILITY 233 (II)
ULTRAMARES 234 (III) DONOGHUE V STEVENSON, NONFEASANCE AND THE RIGHTS OF
TORT LAW 237 C. THE PRINCIPLED APPROACH TO RELATIONAL LOSS 239 D. THE
PRINCIPLED APPROACH TO CONSEQUENTIAL LOSS 246 II. PURE ECONOMIC LOSS 250
A. THE BUILDING CASES 250 (I) THE PRINCIPLED APPROACH 250 (II) THE
POLICY-DRIVEN APPROACHES 252 (III) THE RISK TO THE OWNER'S PERSON AND
PROPERTY AND RISK TO OTHERS 256 B. THE DISAPPOINTED BENEFICIARY CASES
260 III. ECONOMIC LOSS, PRIMARY RIGHTS AND THE GENERAL LAW 267 IV.
ECONOMIC LOSS IN NEGLIGENCE AND THE ECONOMIC TORTS 269 V. CONCLUSION 272
8. NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION AND ASSUMPTION OF RESPONSIBILITY 273 I.
THE NEGLIGENCE MODEL 274 A. CANDLER V CRANE CHRISTMAS & CO 274 B. THE
ANNS TEST AND NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION 276 C. THE INCREMENTAL
APPROACH AND NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION 281 D. REJECTION OF THE
NEGLIGENCE MODEL 282 II. THE ASSUMPTION OF RESPONSIBILITY MODEL 284 A.
THE JUDGMENT IN HEDLEY BYRNE 284 B. THE ROLE OF ASSUMPTION OF
RESPONSIBILITY IN NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION 287 (I) DISCLAIMERS 287
(II) CAUSAL CONVERSATIONS 291 (III) SPECIAL SKILL 292 (IV) THE PURPOSE
OF THE REPRESENTATION AND THE PERSON FOR WHOSE BENEFIT THE STATEMENT WAS
MADE 293 C. PERCEIVED DIFFICULTIES WITH THE ASSUMPTION OF RESPONSIBILITY
MODEL 298 (I) THE PIGEONHOLE ARGUMENT 298 (II) THE ROLE OF PROXIMITY 299
(III) THE ROLE OF REASONABLE FORESEEABILITY 299 (IV) THE ROLE OF
RELIANCE 300 CONTENTS XV (V) THE ROLE OF NEGLIGENCE 301 (VI) CRITICISMS
OF THE NOTION OF ASSUMPTION OF RESPONSIBILITY 303 D. CONCLUSION 310 III.
'NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION'AND THE PRIVATE LAW 311 IV. THE RIGHT OF
SPRING 316 9. NONFEASANCE AND THE LIABILITY OF PUBLIC BODIES 321 I.
NONFEASANCE IN GENERAL 321 A. THE SCOPE OF THE RULE 321 B. ASSUMPTIONS
OF RESPONSIBILITY AND NONFEASANCE 333 II. THE LIABILITY OF PUBLIC BODIES
335 A. GENERAL THEORY 335 (I) THE LIABILITY OF PUBLIC BODIES WHERE,
PRIMA FACIE, A COMMON LAW PRIMARY RIGHT HAS BEEN VIOLATED 335 (II) THE
LIABILITY OF PUBLIC BODIES WHERE, PRIMA FACIE, A COMMON LAW PRIMARY
RIGHT HAS NOT BEEN VIOLATED 337 B. CASE LAW 338 10. DEFENCES 341 I.
CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE 341 II. VOLENTI NON FIT INJURIA 345 A. THE TWO
PARTS OF THE DEFENCE 345 B. WILLING THE HARM 349 C. CONSENTING TO THE
RISK OF THE HARM 357 D. THE VOLENTI DEFENCE AND RESCUERS 365 III.
ILLEGALITY 372 A. GALA V PRESTON 311 B. CORY J IN HALL V HEBERT 377 C.
CORRECTIVE JUSTICE AND ILLEGALITY: WEINRIB AND MCLACHLIN J IN HALL V
HEBERT 379 11. WRONGFUL BIRTH, WRONGFUL CONCEPTION AND NERVOUS SHOCK 385
I. WRONGFUL BIRTH 385 II. WRONGFUL CONCEPTION 386 A. CASE LAW 386 B. THE
LAW OF NEGLIGENCE 389 C. RECOVERY UNDER AN ASSUMPTION OF RESPONSIBILITY
402 III. NERVOUS SHOCK 404 A. PRIMARY VICTIMS 404 B. SECONDARY VICTIMS
407 C. NERVOUS SHOCK AND THE RIGHTS OF THE CLAIMANT 409 XVI CONTENTS 12.
CAUSATION 413 I. WHY CAUSATION? 413 II. THE NATURE OF FACTUAL CAUSATION
415 A. CASE LAW: THE BUT FOR TEST AND ITS ALTERNATIVES 415 B. THE NESS
TEST AND THE TARGETED BUT FOR TEST 418 (I) INTRODUCING THE TESTS 418
(II) PROBLEMS WITH THE TARGETED BUT FOR TEST 419 (III) PROBLEMS WITH THE
NESS TEST 422 C. THE NATURE OF FACTUAL CAUSATION IN OUTLINE 425 D.
EXPLORING FACTUAL CAUSATION 427 III. LIABILITY IN CASES OF
OVER-DETERMINATION 431 A. THE PROBLEM 431 B. NEGLIGENCE AND NOMINAL
DAMAGES 433 C. WRIGHT ON DAMAGES 434 D. THE CLAIMANT'S RIGHTS AND
FACTUAL CAUSATION 435 E. APPLYING THE THEORY TO MORE COMPLEX FACT
PATTERNS 439 13. PROOF AND UNCERTAINTY 445 I. THE BURDEN OF PROOF 446
II. UNCERTAINTY OVER WHETHER THE DEFENDANT WAS NEGLIGENT 447 III.
UNCERTAINTY OVER FACTUAL CAUSATION 453 A. THE PRINCIPLED APPROACH TO
FACTUAL UNCERTAINTY 453 B. APPLYING THE PRINCIPLED APPROACH TO CASES OF
FACTUAL UNCERTAINTY 465 (I) MCGHEE 465 (II) WILSHER ALL (III) FAIRCHILD
472 (IV) SCIENTIFIC UNCERTAINTY AND UNCERTAINTY IN GENERAL 489 IV. LOSS
OF A CHANCE 492 A. THE PROBLEM: GREGG V SCOTT 492 (I) LORD NICHOLLS'
MAIN ARGUMENT 493 (II) LORD NICHOLLS' SECONDARY ARGUMENT 494 (III) LORD
HOFFMANN'S MAIN ARGUMENT 496 (IV) LORD HOFFMANN'S SECONDARY ARGUMENT 497
B. WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO SAY THAT THERE WAS A CHANCE? 498 (I) THE
ARGUMENT FROM QUANTUM PHYSICS 499 (II) FREE WILL 502 (III) LOSS OF
CHANCE AND FACTUAL UNCERTAINTY 503 C. ANOTHER KIND OF LOSS OF A CHANCE
504 CONTENTS XVII 14. CONCLUSION 507 I. CORRECTIVE JUSTICE AND LEGAL
CHANGE 507 II. POLICY AND PRINCIPLE: REDISCOVERING THE LAW OF NEGLIGENCE
512 BIBLIOGRAPHY 517 INDEX 527 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author | Beever, Allan |
| author_facet | Beever, Allan |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Beever, Allan |
| author_variant | a b ab |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV023290202 |
| classification_rvk | PU 4346 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)633146442 (DE-599)BVBBV023290202 |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
| edition | Reprinted |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01078nam a2200301 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV023290202</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20080509 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">080506s2008 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781841136868</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-8411-3686-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1841136867</subfield><subfield code="9">1-84113-686-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)633146442</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV023290202</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PU 4346</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)140564:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Beever, Allan</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Rediscovering the law of negligence</subfield><subfield code="c">Allan Beever</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Reprinted</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Oxford [u.a.]</subfield><subfield code="b">Hart</subfield><subfield code="c">2007 [erschienen] 2008</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XXXI, 530 S.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">SWBplus Fremddatenuebernahme</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016474827&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016474827</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV023290202 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-02T20:43:00Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T21:15:04Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781841136868 1841136867 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016474827 |
| oclc_num | 633146442 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-355 DE-BY-UBR |
| owner_facet | DE-355 DE-BY-UBR |
| physical | XXXI, 530 S. |
| publishDate | 2007 |
| publishDateSearch | 2008 |
| publishDateSort | 2008 |
| publisher | Hart |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Beever, Allan Verfasser aut Rediscovering the law of negligence Allan Beever Reprinted Oxford [u.a.] Hart 2007 [erschienen] 2008 XXXI, 530 S. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier SWBplus Fremddatenuebernahme application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016474827&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Beever, Allan Rediscovering the law of negligence |
| title | Rediscovering the law of negligence |
| title_auth | Rediscovering the law of negligence |
| title_exact_search | Rediscovering the law of negligence |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Rediscovering the law of negligence |
| title_full | Rediscovering the law of negligence Allan Beever |
| title_fullStr | Rediscovering the law of negligence Allan Beever |
| title_full_unstemmed | Rediscovering the law of negligence Allan Beever |
| title_short | Rediscovering the law of negligence |
| title_sort | rediscovering the law of negligence |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016474827&sequence=000002&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT beeverallan rediscoveringthelawofnegligence |