A dialogue on David Hume: on his revision of "A treatise of human nature"
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Amsterdam
Boom
2007
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | 204 S. graph. Darst. |
| ISBN: | 9789085065180 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV023279802 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20090325 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 080428s2007 d||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9789085065180 |9 978-90-8506-518-0 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)635355777 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV023279802 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-29 | ||
| 084 | |a 5,1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Holthoon, F. L. van |d 1934- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)171537750 |4 aut | |
| 240 | 1 | 0 | |a Een dialoog over David Hume |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a A dialogue on David Hume |b on his revision of "A treatise of human nature" |c F.L. van Holthoon |
| 264 | 1 | |a Amsterdam |b Boom |c 2007 | |
| 300 | |a 204 S. |b graph. Darst. | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 600 | 1 | 7 | |a Hume, David |d 1711-1776 |t A treatise of human nature |0 (DE-588)4264226-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Hume, David |d 1711-1776 |t A treatise of human nature |0 (DE-588)4264226-7 |D u |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Erlangen |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016464625&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016464625 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804137597861101568 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | CONTENTS PREFAEE 13 PART I INTRODUCTION FIRST EVENING 19 ON THE PROBLEM
OFHUME AND HIS REWRITING OF THE TREATISE WHY DO MANY CRITICS IGNORE
HUME S ANNOUNCEMENT THAT THE TEXT OFHIS TWO ENQUIRIES RATHER THAN HIS
TREATISE REPRESENTS HIS MATURE PHILOSOPHICAL VIEWS? SECOND EVENING 27
HUME S PARTING WITH GOD THE CRISIS THAT HUME DESCRIBES IN HIS LETTER TO
A LONDON PHYSICIAN IS NOT A RELIGIOUS ONE.1T IS THE EFFECT OFLOSS
OFFAITH AT AN EARLIER DATE. HUME WANTS TO FIND A METHOD FOR STUDYING
MORALITY THAT DOES NOT HAVE TO RELY ON GOD AS THE PRIME MOVER OR
CAUSAFINALIS AND THAT GIVES PRIORITY TO SENTIMENT OVER REASON AS THE
SOURCE OFKNOWLEDGE AND THE SPRING OF HUMAN CONDUCT. HOWEVER HE HAS GREAT
DIFFICULTY IN FINDING THIS METHOD AND THIS UNCERTAINTY PRODUCES HIS
CRISIS. THIRD EVENING 36 A MATTER OFLNFLUENEE NO WRITER HAD A DECISIVE
INFLUENCE ON HUME. HE HAD TO GO HIS LONELYWAY, BECAUSE HE REJECTED GOD
AS THE PRIME MOVER OFNATURE AS THE ULTIMATE EXPLANATION. HOWEVER, THERE
IS EVIDENCE THAT MALEBRANCHE S THEORY OF CAUSALITY INFLUENCED HUME AND
NEWTON S METHOD OFINQUIRY INSPIRED HUME TO APPLY THE PRINCIPLE OF
PARSIMONY WITH GREAT EFFECT. IN EXPLAINING EXPERIENCE HE REDUCES IT TO
RELATIONS BETWEEN IMPRESSIONS AND IDEAS. CONTENTS PART 11 THE STRUCTURE
OF THE TREATISE FOURTH EVENING 53 THE DIVIDE IN THE TREATISE COMPARED
WITH THE REWRITTEN TEXTS THE ARGUMENT OF THE TREATISE SPANS AN EXTENSIVE
FIELD OFINQUIRY. A THEORY OFKNOWLEDGE LEADS TO AN ANALYSIS OF THE
PASSIONS AND THIS BECOMES THE FOUNDATION FOR HUME S MORAL DOCTRINE. IN
THE CONCLUSION OFBOOK I HUME ABRUPTLY TAKES LEAVE OFHIS DESPERATE DOUBTS
AND PUTS HIS TRUST IN HUMAN NATURE. THE ASSOCIATIVE PRINCIPLES OFTHE
DOUBLE RELATIONS OF IDEAS AND IMPRESSIONS AND THAT OF SYMPATHY CONVERT
IDEAS INTO IMPRESSIONS. IN THIS WAY THE ELABORATION OFHUME S THEORY
OFKNOWLEDGE BECOMES MUCH MORE SUBJECTIVE THAN AS PRESENTED IN BOOK I.
HIS APPLICATION OF THE THEORY TO THE PASSIONS MAKES IT POSSIBLE FOR HUME
TO INTERPRET MORAL EXPERIENCE AS AN AUTONOMOUS REALITYOFTHE HUMAN MIND.
THE PATTERNS OF PASSIONS HE ANALYZES IN BOOK 11,SUCH AS THE FAMOUS
SQUARE, ALLOWS HIRN TO BRING THE NATURAL VIRTUES IN LINE WITH THE
ARTIFICIAL ONES. FIFTH EVENING 61 CUSTOM, BELIEF AND FICTION CUSTOM,
BEIIEFANDFICTION ARE THE KEY-CONCEPTS OF HUME S EPISTEMOLOGY. CUSTOM
FUNCTIONS AS THE STABILIZING PRINCIPLE. BELIEFIS ALWAYS A CAUSAL BELIEF
AND FOR THIS REASON CAN BE CHECKED BY EXPERIENCE. YET AS A PRODUCT OF
THE IMAGINATION BELIEFHAS A CHAOTIC AND EVEN ANARCHICAL ASPECT. FICTIONS
ALWAYS ARE THE PRODUCT OFTHE IMAGINATION WITHOUT ANY REFERENCE TO
REALITY AS THIS EXISTS IN THE CASE OFBELIEFS. THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN
BELIEF AND FICTION IS PAPER THIN. 8 CONTENTS PART BI THE REWRITING
PROCESS SIXTH EVENING 81 AMATTEROFSTYLE HUME TURNS A PERSONAL QUEST TO
REACH A SECULAR MORALITY INTO TEXTS WRITTEN TO APPEAL TO THE PUBLIC
OFTHE ENLIGHTENMENT. COMPARINGTHE STYLE OF THE TEXTS OFFERS A REMARKABLE
CONTRAST. THE TREATISE OFTEN IS BADLYWRITTEN WHILE WITH THE ENQUIRIES
HUME BECOMES ONE OF THE GREAT WRITERS OF EIGHTEENTH CENTURY BRITAIN.
SEVENTH EVENING 86 COMPARING THE TREATISE AND THE ENQUIRY CONCERNING
HUMAN UNDERSTANDING COMPARING THN AND EHU MAKES IT C1EARWHAT HUME S
STRATEGY IN REWRITING ISOHE NOW DIRECTLY ADDRESSES HIS PUBLIC AND NOT
ONLY HIRNSELF. ALL THE TECHNICALITIES OFHIS EPISTEMOLOGY RECEDE INTO THE
BACKGROUND AND HIS THEORY OF ASSOCIATION, HIS MOST PROMINENT DOCTRINE IN
THN, BECOMES THE VICTIM OFTHIS STRATEGY. HE LEAVES BEHIND THE
INTROSPECTIVE APPROACH AND CONCENTRATES ON THE PRACTICAL APPLICATION
OFHIS PHILOSOPHY. EIGHTH EVENING 96 PROPAGANDAFOR THE ENLIGHTENMENT
SIMPLIFYING HIS PRINCIPAL THESIS THAT MAN CAN CREATE A SECULAR MORALITY
HUME APPEALS TO HIS PUBLIC AND TEUS THEM THAT THEY CANNOT EXPECT
ANYTHING FROM DIVINE INTERVENTION. OFLIBERTY AND NECESSITY ,
OFMIRAC1ES , AND OF A PARTICULAR PROVIDENCE AND A FUTURE STATE ARE
CENTRAL TEXTS IN HUME S PROPAGANDA FOR A SCIENCE BASED ON EXPERIENCE. 9
CONTENTS NINTH EVENING 103 EHU, GLORIFICATION OFCOMMON SENSE CASUALTIES
OF THE REWRITING ARE THE THEOL) OF ASSOCIATIONS, WHICH IS REDUCED TO
AMINIMUM, AND THE IMAGINATION, WHICH RECEDES INTO THE BACKGROUND.
SCEPTICISM IS RETOUCHED TO BECOME A MILD METHODOLOGICAL INSTRUMENT. EHU
IS A BRILLIANTYETTAME PIECE OFWORK. TENTH EVENING 119 A DISSERTATION ON
THE PASSIONS THE DISSERTATION IS A PATCHWORK MADE OF PASSAGES FROM TH N
11. IN THE PROCESS HUME HAS ELIMINATED SYMPATHY AS A KEY-CONCEPT. THIS
MUST HAVE BEEN A DELIBERATE DECISION. AFTERWRITING EPM HE MUST HAVE FEIT
THAT IT HAD BECOME EXPENDABLE. YET IT REMAINS CLEAR THAT HUME HAS NOT
GIVEN UP ON HIS DOCTRINE OF ASSOCIATIONS. FOR, HE WROTE THE DISSERTATION
TO SAVE ANOTHER ASSOCIATIVE PRINCIPLE OFBOOK 11, NAMELY THE DOUBLE
RELATIONS OF IDEAS AND IMPRESSIONS. ELEVENTH EVENING 122 THE TREATISE
AND THE ENQUIRY CONCEMING THE PRINCIPLES OFMORALS COMPARED IN THN THE
ARTIFICIAL VIRTUES DIRECT THE NATURAL VIRTUES TO THE PUBLIC CAUSE. AFTER
THIS MISSION HAD BEEN ACCOMPLISHED THE DISTINCTION OFTHE TWO TYPES
OFVIRTUES BE CA ME EXPENDABLE AND HUME CAN START HIS MORAL ARGUMENT WITH
THE VIRTUE OFBENEVOLENCE. THE FOUR ARGUMENTS FOR A MORAL CODE BASED ON
BENEVOLENCE, QUALITIES USEFUL TO OURSELVES, QUALITIES IMMEDIATELY
AGREEABLE TO OURSELVES, AND QUALITIES IMMEDIATELY AGREEABLE TO OTHERS
ARE ALREADY PRESENT IN THN, IFIN A SUBORDINATE ROLE. IN EPM THEY BECOME
THE CENTERPIECES OFHIS ETHICS. UTILITY IS THE MEDIATING KEY-CONCEPT. 10
CONTENTS TWELFTH EVENING 128 FROMARTIJICIAL TO NATURAL VIRTUES,JOINING
HUTCHESON AND HIS SCHOOL ESSENTIAL TO HUME S MORAL DOCTRINE IN THN IS
THAT EGOISTIC MOTIVES MAKE US CONCLUDE A SOCIAL CONTRACT WITH OTHERS.
THROUGH SYMPATHY WE GET ACQUAINTED WITH THE PLEASURES AND PAINS OF
OTHERS. THIS EXPERIENCE ALLOWS US TO DEVELOP MORAL DISTINCTIONS ORA
MORAL SENSE. MORAL SENSE IS NOT, AS WITH HUTCHESON, THE STARTING POINT
OF MORALITY, BUT IT DEVELOPS DURING A PROCESS OF CIVILIZATION. IN EPM
THE PASSAGES ON THE RULE OFLAW,JUSTICE AS A VIRTUE AND ALLEGIANCE TO THE
STATE AND ITS MAGISTRACY ARE VERY SHORT AND ONLY SERVE TO ILLUSTRATE THE
NOTION THAT ALL OUR CUSTOMS, RULES AND MANNERS CAN ONLY BE USEFUL WITHIN
A PARTICULAR STATE AND CIVIL SOCIETY. THE MAIN MESSAGE NOW HAS BECOME
THAT HUMAN BEINGS HAVE THE CAPACITY TO OBEY THESE PARTICULAR OBLIGATIONS
AS PART OF THEIR NATURE. THIRTEENTH EVENING 139 FROM SYMPATHY TO UTILITY
MORAL EXPERIENCE HAS A PRACTICAL AND AN ESTHETIC ASPECT. THE UTILE GOES
TOGETHER WITH THE DULCE. HUME WANTS TO ACHIEVE A BALANCE BETWEEN THESE
TWO ASPECTS OF THE MORAL EXPERIENCE. IN THIS RESPECT HE IS A PHILOSOPHER
OFTHE ENLIGHTENMENT. FOURTEENTH EVENING 152 MANNERANDMATTER WE CAN GIVE
A SIMPLE ANSWER TO THE QUESTION WHETHER HUME ONLY CHANGED THE MANNER
OFHIS ARGUMENT OR ALSO ITS MATTER: BECAUSE HUME DRASTICALLY THE MANNER
OFHIS ARGUMENT HE ALSO CHANGED ITS MATTER. 11 CONTENTS NOTEA THE
NEWEDITION OFHUME S TREATISE OFHUMAN NATURE 16 5 NOTE B NORMAN KEMP
SMITH S THE PHILOSOPHY OFDAVID HUME 172 BIBLIOGRAPHY 175 ABBREVIATIONS
182 NOTES 183 INDEX 196 ON THE AUTHOR 20 4 12
|
| adam_txt |
CONTENTS PREFAEE 13 PART I INTRODUCTION FIRST EVENING 19 ON THE PROBLEM
OFHUME AND HIS REWRITING OF THE TREATISE WHY DO MANY CRITICS IGNORE
HUME'S ANNOUNCEMENT THAT THE TEXT OFHIS TWO ENQUIRIES RATHER THAN HIS
TREATISE REPRESENTS HIS MATURE PHILOSOPHICAL VIEWS? SECOND EVENING 27
HUME'S PARTING WITH GOD THE CRISIS THAT HUME DESCRIBES IN HIS LETTER TO
A LONDON PHYSICIAN IS NOT A RELIGIOUS ONE.1T IS THE EFFECT OFLOSS
OFFAITH AT AN EARLIER DATE. HUME WANTS TO FIND A METHOD FOR STUDYING
MORALITY THAT DOES NOT HAVE TO RELY ON GOD AS THE PRIME MOVER OR
CAUSAFINALIS AND THAT GIVES PRIORITY TO SENTIMENT OVER REASON AS THE
SOURCE OFKNOWLEDGE AND THE SPRING OF HUMAN CONDUCT. HOWEVER HE HAS GREAT
DIFFICULTY IN FINDING THIS METHOD AND THIS UNCERTAINTY PRODUCES HIS
CRISIS. THIRD EVENING 36 A MATTER OFLNFLUENEE NO WRITER HAD A DECISIVE
INFLUENCE ON HUME. HE HAD TO GO HIS LONELYWAY, BECAUSE HE REJECTED GOD
AS THE PRIME MOVER OFNATURE AS THE ULTIMATE EXPLANATION. HOWEVER, THERE
IS EVIDENCE THAT MALEBRANCHE'S THEORY OF CAUSALITY INFLUENCED HUME AND
NEWTON'S METHOD OFINQUIRY INSPIRED HUME TO APPLY THE PRINCIPLE OF
PARSIMONY WITH GREAT EFFECT. IN EXPLAINING EXPERIENCE HE REDUCES IT TO
RELATIONS BETWEEN IMPRESSIONS AND IDEAS. CONTENTS PART 11 THE STRUCTURE
OF THE TREATISE FOURTH EVENING 53 THE DIVIDE IN THE TREATISE COMPARED
WITH THE REWRITTEN TEXTS THE ARGUMENT OF THE TREATISE SPANS AN EXTENSIVE
FIELD OFINQUIRY. A THEORY OFKNOWLEDGE LEADS TO AN ANALYSIS OF THE
PASSIONS AND THIS BECOMES THE FOUNDATION FOR HUME'S MORAL DOCTRINE. IN
THE CONCLUSION OFBOOK I HUME ABRUPTLY TAKES LEAVE OFHIS DESPERATE DOUBTS
AND PUTS HIS TRUST IN HUMAN NATURE. THE ASSOCIATIVE PRINCIPLES OFTHE
DOUBLE RELATIONS OF IDEAS AND IMPRESSIONS AND THAT OF SYMPATHY CONVERT
IDEAS INTO IMPRESSIONS. IN THIS WAY THE ELABORATION OFHUME'S THEORY
OFKNOWLEDGE BECOMES MUCH MORE SUBJECTIVE THAN AS PRESENTED IN BOOK I.
HIS APPLICATION OF THE THEORY TO THE PASSIONS MAKES IT POSSIBLE FOR HUME
TO INTERPRET MORAL EXPERIENCE AS AN AUTONOMOUS REALITYOFTHE HUMAN MIND.
THE PATTERNS OF PASSIONS HE ANALYZES IN BOOK 11,SUCH AS THE FAMOUS
SQUARE, ALLOWS HIRN TO BRING THE NATURAL VIRTUES IN LINE WITH THE
ARTIFICIAL ONES. FIFTH EVENING 61 CUSTOM, BELIEF AND FICTION CUSTOM,
BEIIEFANDFICTION ARE THE KEY-CONCEPTS OF HUME'S EPISTEMOLOGY. CUSTOM
FUNCTIONS AS THE STABILIZING PRINCIPLE. BELIEFIS ALWAYS A CAUSAL BELIEF
AND FOR THIS REASON CAN BE CHECKED BY EXPERIENCE. YET AS A PRODUCT OF
THE IMAGINATION BELIEFHAS A CHAOTIC AND EVEN ANARCHICAL ASPECT. FICTIONS
ALWAYS ARE THE PRODUCT OFTHE IMAGINATION WITHOUT ANY REFERENCE TO
REALITY AS THIS EXISTS IN THE CASE OFBELIEFS. THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN
BELIEF AND FICTION IS PAPER THIN. 8 CONTENTS PART BI THE REWRITING
PROCESS SIXTH EVENING 81 AMATTEROFSTYLE HUME TURNS A PERSONAL QUEST TO
REACH A SECULAR MORALITY INTO TEXTS WRITTEN TO APPEAL TO THE PUBLIC
OFTHE ENLIGHTENMENT. COMPARINGTHE STYLE OF THE TEXTS OFFERS A REMARKABLE
CONTRAST. THE TREATISE OFTEN IS BADLYWRITTEN WHILE WITH THE ENQUIRIES
HUME BECOMES ONE OF THE GREAT WRITERS OF EIGHTEENTH CENTURY BRITAIN.
SEVENTH EVENING 86 COMPARING THE TREATISE AND THE ENQUIRY CONCERNING
HUMAN UNDERSTANDING COMPARING THN AND EHU MAKES IT C1EARWHAT HUME'S
STRATEGY IN REWRITING ISOHE NOW DIRECTLY ADDRESSES HIS PUBLIC AND NOT
ONLY HIRNSELF. ALL THE TECHNICALITIES OFHIS EPISTEMOLOGY RECEDE INTO THE
BACKGROUND AND HIS THEORY OF ASSOCIATION, HIS MOST PROMINENT DOCTRINE IN
THN, BECOMES THE VICTIM OFTHIS STRATEGY. HE LEAVES BEHIND THE
INTROSPECTIVE APPROACH AND CONCENTRATES ON THE PRACTICAL APPLICATION
OFHIS PHILOSOPHY. EIGHTH EVENING 96 PROPAGANDAFOR THE ENLIGHTENMENT
SIMPLIFYING HIS PRINCIPAL THESIS THAT MAN CAN CREATE A SECULAR MORALITY
HUME APPEALS TO HIS PUBLIC AND TEUS THEM THAT THEY CANNOT EXPECT
ANYTHING FROM DIVINE INTERVENTION. "OFLIBERTY AND NECESSITY",
"OFMIRAC1ES", AND "OF A PARTICULAR PROVIDENCE AND A FUTURE STATE" ARE
CENTRAL TEXTS IN HUME'S PROPAGANDA FOR A SCIENCE BASED ON EXPERIENCE. 9
CONTENTS NINTH EVENING 103 EHU, GLORIFICATION OFCOMMON SENSE CASUALTIES
OF THE REWRITING ARE THE THEOL)' OF ASSOCIATIONS, WHICH IS REDUCED TO
AMINIMUM, AND THE IMAGINATION, WHICH RECEDES INTO THE BACKGROUND.
SCEPTICISM IS RETOUCHED TO BECOME A MILD METHODOLOGICAL INSTRUMENT. EHU
IS A BRILLIANTYETTAME PIECE OFWORK. TENTH EVENING 119 A DISSERTATION ON
THE PASSIONS THE DISSERTATION IS A PATCHWORK MADE OF PASSAGES FROM TH N
11. IN THE PROCESS HUME HAS ELIMINATED SYMPATHY AS A KEY-CONCEPT. THIS
MUST HAVE BEEN A DELIBERATE DECISION. AFTERWRITING EPM HE MUST HAVE FEIT
THAT IT HAD BECOME EXPENDABLE. YET IT REMAINS CLEAR THAT HUME HAS NOT
GIVEN UP ON HIS DOCTRINE OF ASSOCIATIONS. FOR, HE WROTE THE DISSERTATION
TO SAVE ANOTHER ASSOCIATIVE PRINCIPLE OFBOOK 11, NAMELY THE DOUBLE
RELATIONS OF IDEAS AND IMPRESSIONS. ELEVENTH EVENING 122 THE TREATISE
AND THE ENQUIRY CONCEMING THE PRINCIPLES OFMORALS COMPARED IN THN THE
ARTIFICIAL VIRTUES DIRECT THE NATURAL VIRTUES TO THE PUBLIC CAUSE. AFTER
THIS MISSION HAD BEEN ACCOMPLISHED THE DISTINCTION OFTHE TWO TYPES
OFVIRTUES BE CA ME EXPENDABLE AND HUME CAN START HIS MORAL ARGUMENT WITH
THE VIRTUE OFBENEVOLENCE. THE FOUR ARGUMENTS FOR A MORAL CODE BASED ON
BENEVOLENCE, QUALITIES USEFUL TO OURSELVES, QUALITIES IMMEDIATELY
AGREEABLE TO OURSELVES, AND QUALITIES IMMEDIATELY AGREEABLE TO OTHERS
ARE ALREADY PRESENT IN THN, IFIN A SUBORDINATE ROLE. IN EPM THEY BECOME
THE CENTERPIECES OFHIS ETHICS. UTILITY IS THE MEDIATING KEY-CONCEPT. 10
CONTENTS TWELFTH EVENING 128 FROMARTIJICIAL TO NATURAL VIRTUES,JOINING
HUTCHESON AND HIS SCHOOL ESSENTIAL TO HUME'S MORAL DOCTRINE IN THN IS
THAT EGOISTIC MOTIVES MAKE US CONCLUDE A SOCIAL CONTRACT WITH OTHERS.
THROUGH SYMPATHY WE GET ACQUAINTED WITH THE PLEASURES AND PAINS OF
OTHERS. THIS EXPERIENCE ALLOWS US TO DEVELOP MORAL DISTINCTIONS ORA
MORAL SENSE. MORAL SENSE IS NOT, AS WITH HUTCHESON, THE STARTING POINT
OF MORALITY, BUT IT DEVELOPS DURING A PROCESS OF CIVILIZATION. IN EPM
THE PASSAGES ON THE RULE OFLAW,JUSTICE AS A VIRTUE AND ALLEGIANCE TO THE
STATE AND ITS MAGISTRACY ARE VERY SHORT AND ONLY SERVE TO ILLUSTRATE THE
NOTION THAT ALL OUR CUSTOMS, RULES AND MANNERS CAN ONLY BE USEFUL WITHIN
A PARTICULAR STATE AND CIVIL SOCIETY. THE MAIN MESSAGE NOW HAS BECOME
THAT HUMAN BEINGS HAVE THE CAPACITY TO OBEY THESE PARTICULAR OBLIGATIONS
AS PART OF THEIR NATURE. THIRTEENTH EVENING 139 FROM SYMPATHY TO UTILITY
MORAL EXPERIENCE HAS A PRACTICAL AND AN ESTHETIC ASPECT. THE UTILE GOES
TOGETHER WITH THE DULCE. HUME WANTS TO ACHIEVE A BALANCE BETWEEN THESE
TWO ASPECTS OF THE MORAL EXPERIENCE. IN THIS RESPECT HE IS A PHILOSOPHER
OFTHE ENLIGHTENMENT. FOURTEENTH EVENING 152 MANNERANDMATTER WE CAN GIVE
A SIMPLE ANSWER TO THE QUESTION WHETHER HUME ONLY CHANGED THE MANNER
OFHIS ARGUMENT OR ALSO ITS MATTER: BECAUSE HUME DRASTICALLY THE MANNER
OFHIS ARGUMENT HE ALSO CHANGED ITS MATTER. 11 CONTENTS NOTEA THE
NEWEDITION OFHUME'S TREATISE OFHUMAN NATURE 16 5 NOTE B NORMAN KEMP
SMITH'S THE PHILOSOPHY OFDAVID HUME 172 BIBLIOGRAPHY 175 ABBREVIATIONS
182 NOTES 183 INDEX 196 ON THE AUTHOR 20 4 12 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author | Holthoon, F. L. van 1934- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)171537750 |
| author_facet | Holthoon, F. L. van 1934- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Holthoon, F. L. van 1934- |
| author_variant | f l v h flv flvh |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV023279802 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)635355777 (DE-599)BVBBV023279802 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>01323nam a2200325 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV023279802</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20090325 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">080428s2007 d||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789085065180</subfield><subfield code="9">978-90-8506-518-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)635355777</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV023279802</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rakwb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">5,1</subfield><subfield code="2">ssgn</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Holthoon, F. L. van</subfield><subfield code="d">1934-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)171537750</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="240" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Een dialoog over David Hume</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A dialogue on David Hume</subfield><subfield code="b">on his revision of "A treatise of human nature"</subfield><subfield code="c">F.L. van Holthoon</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Amsterdam</subfield><subfield code="b">Boom</subfield><subfield code="c">2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">204 S.</subfield><subfield code="b">graph. Darst.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Hume, David</subfield><subfield code="d">1711-1776</subfield><subfield code="t">A treatise of human nature</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4264226-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Hume, David</subfield><subfield code="d">1711-1776</subfield><subfield code="t">A treatise of human nature</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4264226-7</subfield><subfield code="D">u</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Erlangen</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016464625&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016464625</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV023279802 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-02T20:39:22Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-09T21:14:50Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9789085065180 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-016464625 |
| oclc_num | 635355777 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-29 |
| owner_facet | DE-29 |
| physical | 204 S. graph. Darst. |
| publishDate | 2007 |
| publishDateSearch | 2007 |
| publishDateSort | 2007 |
| publisher | Boom |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Holthoon, F. L. van 1934- Verfasser (DE-588)171537750 aut Een dialoog over David Hume A dialogue on David Hume on his revision of "A treatise of human nature" F.L. van Holthoon Amsterdam Boom 2007 204 S. graph. Darst. txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Hume, David 1711-1776 A treatise of human nature (DE-588)4264226-7 gnd rswk-swf Hume, David 1711-1776 A treatise of human nature (DE-588)4264226-7 u DE-604 Digitalisierung UB Erlangen application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016464625&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Holthoon, F. L. van 1934- A dialogue on David Hume on his revision of "A treatise of human nature" Hume, David 1711-1776 A treatise of human nature (DE-588)4264226-7 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4264226-7 |
| title | A dialogue on David Hume on his revision of "A treatise of human nature" |
| title_alt | Een dialoog over David Hume |
| title_auth | A dialogue on David Hume on his revision of "A treatise of human nature" |
| title_exact_search | A dialogue on David Hume on his revision of "A treatise of human nature" |
| title_exact_search_txtP | A dialogue on David Hume on his revision of "A treatise of human nature" |
| title_full | A dialogue on David Hume on his revision of "A treatise of human nature" F.L. van Holthoon |
| title_fullStr | A dialogue on David Hume on his revision of "A treatise of human nature" F.L. van Holthoon |
| title_full_unstemmed | A dialogue on David Hume on his revision of "A treatise of human nature" F.L. van Holthoon |
| title_short | A dialogue on David Hume |
| title_sort | a dialogue on david hume on his revision of a treatise of human nature |
| title_sub | on his revision of "A treatise of human nature" |
| topic | Hume, David 1711-1776 A treatise of human nature (DE-588)4264226-7 gnd |
| topic_facet | Hume, David 1711-1776 A treatise of human nature |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=016464625&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT holthoonflvan eendialoogoverdavidhume AT holthoonflvan adialogueondavidhumeonhisrevisionofatreatiseofhumannature |